The impact of thoracic duct resection on the long-term body composition of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and survived without recurrence

Prognostic Impact of Thoracic Duct Resection in Patients Who Underwent Transthoracic Esophagectomy Following Neoadjuvant Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Exploratory Analysis of JCOG1109

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have investigated whether thoracic duct (TD) resection improves prognosis, the conclusion remains controversial. JCOG1109 is a three-arm randomized phase III trial to confirm the survival advantage of docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (DCF), and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF) combined with radiotherapy (CF-RT) over CF as neoadjuvant treatment. The study aimed to evaluate the survival impact of TD resection and its association with neoadjuvant treatment and pathological response in patients enrolled in JCOG1109.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological factors, surgical results, and prognosis were compared between TD preserved and resected groups. The survival impact of TD resection was also evaluated in the subgroups on the basis of combinations of preoperative therapy and pathological response.

RESULTS

Between December 2012 and July 2018, 601 patients were randomized (CF/DCF/CF-RT; 199/202/200) in JCOG1109. Of them, 541 patients underwent esophagectomy (183/181/177), and TD was resected in 265 patients (93/91/81). For the entire cohort, TD resection was not a significant prognostic factor for overall survival in the multivariable analysis (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.91-1.57). In the subgroup analyses by combinations of neoadjuvant treatment and pathological response, TD resected group had a significantly better overall survival compared with TD preserved group in patients who received DCF and achieved pathological response (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

The survival benefit of TD resection was not demonstrated in patients with surgically resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma enrolled in JCOG1109. The residual tumor burden after neoadjuvant treatment might be linked to the survival impact of TD resection.

Robotic esophagectomy with function-preserving radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer

Radical lymphadenectomy is the critical component of surgery for esophageal cancer. However, lymphadenectomy significantly contributes to postoperative morbidity, particularly in terms of pulmonary complications following esophagectomy. Function-preserving mediastinal lymphadenectomy seeks to balance the procedure's necessary radicality and optimal functional outcomes. This approach emphasizes the preservation of the thoracic duct, tracheobronchial vascularity, and the pulmonary and recurrent laryngeal branches of the vagus nerve. Preservation of the thoracic duct is facilitated by indocyanine green fluorescence. Compared to the conventional technique of thoracic duct identification using anatomical landmarks, indocyanine green fluorescence lymphangiography offers real-time feedback, making it particularly advantageous in cases with complex anatomy or when the thoracic duct is challenging to visualize using conventional methods. Preservation of pulmonary branches of the right vagus during subcarinal lymphadenectomy and left recurrent laryngeal nerve during left paratracheal node dissection are technically challenging. The description of two types of left recurrent laryngeal nerve node dissection and technical tips for nerve function preservation are outlined in this review. Intraoperative neuromonitoring is a useful adjunct for nerve-sparing mediastinal lymphadenectomy. As ischemia to the respiratory tract impairs respiratory protective mechanisms, preservation of the tracheobronchial blood supply is critical. Preoperative imaging to detect bronchial artery anatomical variations and intraoperative assessment of perfusion using laser doppler flowmetry and indocyanine green fluorescence angiography are useful strategies to minimize tracheobronchial ischemia. Function-preserving mediastinal lymphadenectomy has the potential to improve short- and long-term outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Impact of Thoracic Duct Resection on Long-Term Survival After Esophagectomy: Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical esophagectomy, including thoracic duct resection (TDR), has been proposed to improve regional lymphadenectomy and possibly reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence. However, because of its impact on immunoregulation, some authors have expressed concerns about its possible detrimental effect on long-term survival. The purpose of this review was to assess the influence of TDR on long-term survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched through 15 March 2024. Overall survival (OS), cancer specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary outcomes. Restricted mean survival time difference (RMSTD), risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used as pooled effect size measures. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology was employed to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

The analysis included six studies with 5756 patients undergoing transthoracic esophagectomy. TDR was reported in 49.1%. Patients' ages ranged from 27 to 79 years and 86% were males. At 4-year follow-up, the multivariate meta-analysis showed similar results for the comparison noTDR versus TDR in term of OS [- 0.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 3.1, 1.3], CSS (0.1 months, 95% CI - 0.9, 1.2), and DFS (1.5 months, 95% CI - 2.6, 5.5). TDR was associated with a significantly higher number of harvested mediastinal lymph nodes (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.01-1.13) and higher risk of postoperative chylothorax (RR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.04-2.23). Anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

TDR seems not to improve long-term OS, CSS, and DFS regardless of tumor stage. Routine TDR should not be routinely recommended during esophagectomy.

Prevalence and clinical outcomes of sarcopenia in patients with esophageal, gastric or colorectal cancers receiving preoperative neoadjuvant therapy: A meta-analysis

Objective

To investigate the prevalence of sarcopenia and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with esophageal, gastric, or colorectal cancer (EC, GC, and CRC) receiving neoadjuvant therapy through Meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase databases, and Cochrane Library for the prevalence of sarcopenia and its impact on clinical outcomes in EC, GC, or CRC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) from inception to November 2022. The primary endpoints were the prevalence of sarcopenia and overall survival in patients with EC, GC, or CRC treated with NAT. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival, total postoperative complications, grade 3-4 chemotherapy toxicity, and 30-day mortality after surgery.

Results

Thirty-one retrospective studies with 3651 subjects were included. In a fixed-effects model, the prevalence of muscle loss was higher in patients with EC, GC, or CRC at 50% (95% CI ​= ​42% to 58%). The results of the multivariate analysis showed that preoperative patients with sarcopenia had a 1.91 times shorter overall survival (95% CI ​= ​1.61-2.27) and a 1.77 times shorter recurrence-free survival time (95% CI ​= ​1.33-2.35) than patients without sarcopenia, and that patients with sarcopenia had a higher risk of total postoperative complications than patients without sarcopenia OR ​= ​1.27 (95% CI ​= ​1.03-1.57). However, the two groups had no statistical difference in grade 3-4 chemotherapy toxicity (P ​= ​0.84) or 30-d postoperative mortality (P ​= ​0.88).

Conclusions

The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with EC, GC, or CRC during NAT is high, and it is associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Clinicians should closely monitor the changes in patients' body composition and guide patients to carry out a reasonable diet and appropriate exercise to improve their poor prognosis and quality of life.

Systematic review registration

CRD42023387817.