Long-term prognostic value of ischaemia and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-related revascularization for stable coronary disease, irrespective of patient's sex: a large retrospective study

Absence of long-term incremental prognostic value of inducible wall motion abnormalities on dipyridamole stress CMR in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

This single-center retrospective study evaluated the long-term (~5 years) prognostic value of dipyridamole stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), assessing the impact of both key phases of the ischemic cascade (perfusion and wall motion).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We considered 322 consecutive patients who underwent dipyridamole stress CMR. Abnormal wall motion at rest and after dipyridamole, perfusion at stress and at rest, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were analyzed. End-points were non-fatal myocardial infarction, unplanned late revascularization (60 days after CMR), and cardiac death.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were excluded because they underwent early revascularization (within 60 days after stress CMR), leading to a final population of 278 patients (73 females, 62.42 ± 10.50 years). A positive stress CMR was found in 78 (28.1%) patients; 50 patients had a reversible stress perfusion defect in at least one myocardial segment and 28 had a reversible stress perfusion defect plus worsening of stress wall motion in comparison with the rest. During a mean follow-up time of 59.34 ± 31.72 months, 37 (13.3%) cardiac events were recorded: 10 cardiac deaths, one non-fatal myocardial infarction, and 26 late revascularization after unstable angina or myocardial infarction. According to the Cox regression analysis, age, diabetes mellitus, previous revascularization, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), reversible perfusion and perfusion + motion defect, and LGE were significant univariate prognosticators. The presence of associated wall motion abnormality (WMA) did not provide additional prognostic stratification in comparison to the only perfusion defect. In the multivariate Cox regression, the independent predictive factors were diabetes (hazard-ratio-HR = 5.64, p < 0.0001), reversible perfusion defect and reversible perfusion + motion defect vs normal stress CMR (HR = 6.43, p < 0.0001, and HR = 4.57, p = 0.004; respectively), and LVEF (HR = 0.96, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

A positive dipyridamole stress CMR predicted a higher long-term risk of cardiovascular events, but the presence of inducible WMA did not show any additional prognostic value over the reversible perfusion defect.

KEY POINTS

Question The long-term incremental prognostic value of inducible wall motion abnormalities by stress cardiac MR in patients with known or suspected CAD requires investigation. Findings The presence of inducible wall motion abnormalities did not offer additional prognostic value in comparison to the only reversible perfusion defect. Clinical relevance Independent from the presence of wall motion abnormalities, more aggressive management may be appropriate in patients with reversible perfusion defects to reduce the long-term risk of cardiovascular events.

Perfusion Imaging for the Heart

The use of myocardial perfusion imaging during a stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination for the evaluation of coronary artery disease is now recommended by both US and European guidelines. Several studies have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Stress perfusion CMR has been shown to be a noninvasive and cost-effective alternative to guide coronary revascularization.

Prognostic impact of artificial intelligence-based fully automated global circumferential strain in patients undergoing stress CMR

AIMS

To determine whether fully automated artificial intelligence-based global circumferential strain (GCS) assessed during vasodilator stress cardiovascular (CV) magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide incremental prognostic value.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2018, a longitudinal study included all consecutive patients with abnormal stress CMR defined by the presence of inducible ischaemia and/or late gadolinium enhancement. Control subjects with normal stress CMR were selected using a propensity score-matching. Stress-GCS was assessed using a fully automatic machine-learning algorithm based on featured-tracking imaging from short-axis cine images. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse clinical events (MACE) defined as CV mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction. Cox regressions evaluated the association between stress-GCS and the primary outcome after adjustment for traditional prognosticators. In 2152 patients [66 ± 12 years, 77% men, 1:1 matched patients (1076 with normal and 1076 with abnormal CMR)], stress-GCS was associated with MACE [median follow-up 5.2 (4.8-5.5) years] after adjustment for risk factors in the propensity-matched population [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.12 (95% CI, 1.06-1.18)], and patients with normal CMR [adjusted HR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.19-1.53), both P < 0.001], but not in patients with abnormal CMR (P = 0.058). In patients with normal CMR, an increased stress-GCS showed the best improvement in model discrimination and reclassification above traditional and stress CMR findings (C-statistic improvement: 0.14; NRI = 0.430; IDI = 0.089, all P < 0.001; LR-test P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stress-GCS is not a predictor of MACE in patients with ischaemia, but has an incremental prognostic value in those with a normal CMR although the absolute event rate remains low.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The clinical utility of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in stable chest pain is still debated, and the low-risk period for adverse cardiovascular (CV) events after a negative test result is unknown.

Objective

To provide contemporary quantitative data synthesis of the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR in stable chest pain.

Data Sources

PubMed and Embase databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PROSPERO, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were searched for potentially relevant articles from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2021.

Study Selection

Selected studies evaluated CMR and reported estimates of diagnostic accuracy and/or raw data of adverse CV events for participants with either positive or negative stress CMR results. Prespecified combinations of keywords related to the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of stress CMR were used. A total of 3144 records were evaluated for title and abstract; of those, 235 articles were included in the full-text assessment of eligibility. After exclusions, 64 studies (74 470 total patients) published from October 29, 2002, through October 19, 2021, were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), odds ratio (OR), and annualized event rate (AER) for all-cause death, CV death, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) defined as the composite of myocardial infarction and CV death.

Results

A total of 33 diagnostic studies pooling 7814 individuals and 31 prognostic studies pooling 67 080 individuals (mean [SD] follow-up, 3.5 [2.1] years; range, 0.9-8.8 years; 381 357 person-years) were identified. Stress CMR yielded a DOR of 26.4 (95% CI, 10.6-65.9), a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI, 68%-89%), a specificity of 86% (95% CI, 75%-93%), and an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.89) for the detection of functionally obstructive coronary artery disease. In the subgroup analysis, stress CMR yielded higher diagnostic accuracy in the setting of suspected coronary artery disease (DOR, 53.4; 95% CI, 27.7-103.0) or when using 3-T imaging (DOR, 33.2; 95% CI, 19.9-55.4). The presence of stress-inducible ischemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.69-2.31), CV mortality (OR, 6.40; 95% CI, 4.48-9.14), and MACEs (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 4.04-7.04). The presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with higher all-cause mortality (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.99-2.47), CV mortality (OR, 6.03; 95% CI, 2.76-13.13), and increased risk of MACEs (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 3.42-8.60). After a negative test result, pooled AERs for CV death were less than 1.0%.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this study, stress CMR yielded high diagnostic accuracy and delivered robust prognostication, particularly when 3-T scanners were used. While inducible myocardial ischemia and LGE were associated with higher mortality and risk of MACEs, normal stress CMR results were associated with a lower risk of MACEs for at least 3.5 years.

Midterm Clinical Outcomes for Deferred Coronary Revascularization on the Basis of Resting Full-Cycle Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements

The midterm prognosis of patients with deferred revascularization based on resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) is not well established. We investigated the midterm clinical outcomes of 137 consecutive patients with deferred revascularization of 177 coronary arteries based on RFR and FFR. Patients were classified into 3 groups (concordant normal, concordant abnormal, discordant FFR and RFR), using known cutoffs for FFR (≤0.80) and RFR (≤0.89). All-cause mortality occurred in 9 (6.6%) and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in 16 patients (11.7%). Concordant abnormal, age, body mass index (BMI), and current or history of cancer were associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality. In a multivariable model, current or history of cancer was significantly associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 6.8, p = 0.02). Concordant abnormal, current or history of cancer, BMI, and left ventricular ejection fraction were associated with increased risk of MACE, and all predictors correlated significantly with MACE (abnormal concordance: HR 4.2, p = 0.043; current or history of cancer: HR 4.0, p = 0.047; BMI: HR 0.8, p = 0.020; left ventricular ejection fraction: HR 0.9, p = 0.017). Although these results support performing percutaneous coronary intervention according to evidence-based RFR or FFR thresholds, deferred lesions with discordant FFR and RFR results were not associated with worse prognosis.

Safety, feasibility, and prognostic value of stress perfusion CMR in patients with MR-conditional pacemaker

AIMS

To assess the safety, feasibility, and prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with pacemaker (PM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2021, we conducted a bi-centre longitudinal study with all consecutive patients with MR-conditional PM referred for vasodilator stress CMR at 1.5 T in the Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud and Lariboisiere University Hospital. They were followed for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the prognostic value of CMR parameters. The quality of CMR was rated by two observers blinded to clinical details. Of 304 patients who completed the CMR protocol, 273 patients (70% male, mean age 71 ± 9 years) completed the follow-up (median [interquartile range], 7.1 [5.4-7.5] years). Among those, 32 experienced a MACE (11.7%). Stress CMR was well tolerated with no significant change in lead thresholds or pacing parameters. Overall, the image quality was rated good or excellent in 84.9% of segments. Ischaemia and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were significantly associated with the occurrence of MACE (hazard ratio, HR: 11.71 [95% CI: 4.60-28.2]; and HR: 5.62 [95% CI: 2.02-16.21], both P < 0.001). After adjustment for traditional risk factors, ischaemia and LGE were independent predictors of MACE (HR: 5.08 [95% CI: 2.58-14.0]; and HR: 2.28 [95% CI: 2.05-3.76]; both P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Stress CMR is safe, feasible and has a good discriminative prognostic value in consecutive patients with PM.

The year 2021 in the European Heart Journal—Cardiovascular Imaging: Part I

The European Heart Journal—Cardiovascular Imaging was introduced in 2012 and has during these 10 years become one of the leading multimodality cardiovascular imaging journals. The journal is currently ranked as Number 19 among all cardiovascular journals. It has an impressive impact factor of 9.130 and our journal is well established as one of the top cardiovascular journals. The most important studies published in our Journal in 2021 will be highlighted in two reports. Part I of the review will focus on studies about myocardial function and risk prediction, myocardial ischaemia, and emerging techniques in cardiovascular imaging, while Part II will focus on valvular heart disease, heart failure, cardiomyopathies, and congenital heart disease.