Apples, oranges, or pears: unexpected insights in coronary pathophysiology

Impact of cardiac history and myocardial scar on increase of myocardial perfusion after revascularization

PURPOSE

We sought to assess the impact of coronary revascularization on myocardial perfusion and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in patients without a cardiac history, with prior myocardial infarction (MI) or non-MI percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Furthermore, we studied the impact of scar tissue.

METHODS

Symptomatic patients underwent [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) and FFR before and after revascularization. Patients with prior CAD, defined as prior MI or PCI, underwent scar quantification by magnetic resonance imaging late gadolinium enhancement.

RESULTS

Among 137 patients (87% male, age 62.2 ± 9.5 years) 84 (61%) had a prior MI or PCI. The increase in FFR and hyperemic myocardial blood flow (hMBF) was less in patients with prior MI or non-MI PCI compared to those without a cardiac history (FFR: 0.23 ± 0.14 vs. 0.20 ± 0.12 vs. 0.31 ± 0.18, p = 0.02; hMBF: 0.54 ± 0.75 vs. 0.62 ± 0.97 vs. 0.91 ± 0.96 ml/min/g, p = 0.04). Post-revascularization FFR and hMBF were similar across patients without a cardiac history or with prior MI or non-MI PCI. An increase in FFR was strongly associated to hMBF increase in patients without a cardiac history or with prior MI/non-MI PCI (r = 0.60 and r = 0.60, p < 0.01 for both). Similar results were found for coronary flow reserve. In patients with prior MI scar was negatively correlated to hMBF increase and independently predictive of an attenuated CFR increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Post revascularization FFR and perfusion were similar among patients without a cardiac history, with prior MI or non-MI PCI. In patients with prior MI scar burden was associated to an attenuated perfusion increase.

Post COVID-19 syndrome with impairment of flow-mediated epicardial vasodilation and flow reserve

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 cardiovascular syndrome (PASC-CVS) is associated with alterations in coronary circulatory function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In individuals with PASC-CVS but without known cardiovascular risk factors (n = 23) and in healthy controls (CON, n = 23), myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed with ¹³ N-ammonia and PET/CT in mL/g/min during regadenoson-stimulated hyperemia, at rest, and the global myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was calculated. MBF was also measured in the mid and mid-distal myocardium of the left ventricle (LV). The Δ longitudinal MBF gradient (hyperemia minus rest) as a reflection of an impairment of flow-mediated epicardial vasodilation, was calculated.

RESULTS

Resting MBF was significantly higher in PASC-CVS than in CON (1.29 ± 0.27 vs. 1.08 ± 0.20 ml/g/min, p ≤ .024), while hyperemic MBFs did not differ significantly among groups (2.46 ± 0.53 and 2.40 ± 0.34 ml/g/min, p = .621). The MFR was significantly less in PASC-CVS than in CON (1.97 ± 0.54 vs. 2.27 ± 0.43, p ≤ .031). In addition, there was a Δ longitudinal MBF gradient in PASC-CVS, not observed in CON (-0.17 ± 0.18 vs. 0.04 ± 0.11 ml/g/min, p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 cardiovascular syndrome may be associated with an impairment of flow-mediated epicardial vasodilation, while reductions in coronary vasodilator capacity appear predominantly related to increases in resting flow in women deserving further investigations.