Combinations of antithrombotic therapies prescribed after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes and atrial fibrillation: data from the nationwide MATADOR-PCI registry

Changes in Antithrombotic Therapy Prescription in Patients with a Combination of Atrial Fibrillation and Myocardial Infarction in a Specialised Inpatient Department from 2016-2019 and Associations with Prognosis

Background and Objectives: The problem of treating patients with atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction is relevant. The issue of optimal antithrombotic therapy in these patients has not been definitively resolved. This work analyzes the influence of clinical factors and treatment on the long-term prognosis of patients. Materials and Methods: The research included 360 patients with atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction during 2016-2019. Results: The factors associated with fatal outcomes were age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.07; p < 0.001); stroke (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.27-3.00; p = 0.0002); glomerular filtration rate (HR: 0.988; 95% CI: 0.978-0.998; p = 0.03); left ventricular ejection fraction (HR: 0.975; 95% CI: 0.957-0.999; p = 0.007); and aspirin (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.73; p < 0.001). The factors associated with the combined endpoint were chronic kidney disease (HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.01-2.10; p = 0.04); HAS-BLED (HR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.06-1.43; p = 0.007); percutaneous coronary intervention (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.96; p = 0.03); and aspirin (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.97; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Double and triple antithrombotic therapy were not associated with outcomes. Aspirin improved the prognosis for survival and the combined endpoint.

Current status of antithrombotic therapy and in-hospital outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Germany

BACKGROUND

Little is known about current patterns of antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice in Germany.

METHODS

The RIVA-PCI is a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter study with follow-up until hospital discharge including consecutive patients with AF undergoing PCI.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and March 2020, 1636 patients (elective in 52.6%, non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome [NSTE-ACS] in 39.3%, ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 8.2%) from 51 German hospitals were enrolled in the study. After PCI a dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) consisting of OAC and a P2Y12 inhibitor was given to 66.0%, triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) to 26.0%, dual antiplatelet therapy to 5.5%, and a mono-therapy to 2.5% of the patients. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were given to 82.4% and vitamin K antagonists to 11.5% of the patients. In-hospital events included death in 12 cases (0.7%), myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke in four (0.2%) patients each, while 2.8% of patients had bleeding complications. The recommended durations for DAT or TAT at discharge were 1 month (1.5%), 3 months (2.1%), 6 months (43.1%), and 12 months (45.6%), with a 6-month course of DAT (47.7%) most often recommended after elective PCI and a 12-month course of DAT (40.1%) after ACS.

CONCLUSION

The preferred therapy after PCI in patients with AF is DAT with a NOAC and clopidogrel. In-hospital ischemic and bleeding events were rare. The recommended durations for combination therapy vary considerably.

ANMCO position paper on antithrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing intracoronary stenting and/or acute coronary syndromes

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with or without acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a subgroup with a challenging pharmacological management. Indeed, if on the one hand, antithrombotic therapy should reduce the risk related to recurrent ischaemic events and/or stent thrombosis; on the other hand, care must be taken to avoid major bleeding events. In recent years, several trials, which overall included more than 12 000 patients, have been conducted demonstrating the safety of different therapeutic combinations of oral antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents. In the present ANMCO position paper, we propose a decision-making algorithm on antithrombotic strategies based on scientific evidence and expert consensus to be adopted in the periprocedural phase, at the time of hospital discharge, and in the long-term follow-up of patients with AF undergoing PCI with/without ACS.

Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). After percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the antithrombotic therapy consists of a combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents to reduce the ischemic and thromboembolic risk, at the cost of increased bleeding events. In the past few years, several randomized clinical trials involving over 12,000 patients have been conducted to compare the safety of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in association with a single- or double-antiplatelet agent, in the so-called dual- (DAT) or triple-antithrombotic therapy (TAT). These studies and several meta-analyses showed a consistent benefit for reducing bleeding events of DAT over TAT and of DOAC over VKA, without concerns about ischemic endpoints, except for a trend for increased stent thrombosis risk. The present paper examines current international guidelines’ recommendations and reviews clinical trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies conducted on AF patients treated with DAT or TAT after PCI for acute coronary syndromes.