Freedom from atrial arrhythmia and other clinical outcomes at 5 years and beyond after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Correlation between diagnosis-to-ablation time and atrial fibrillation recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The time from the initial diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) to the index ablation procedure, known as diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT), is a modifiable risk factor that is correlated to affect the recurrence of AF. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the correlation between diagnosis-to-ablation time and AF recurrence.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from database inception till June 2024. Studies reporting diagnosis-to-ablation time and its relation with AF recurrence were included. The primary analysis evaluated outcomes segregated by DAT ≤ 1 year versus > 1 year. Random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to evaluate AF recurrence.

RESULTS

Of the 9177 articles, only 6 observational studies got through the inclusion criteria with a total participant count of 14,862. DAT of greater than 1 year was associated with increased risk of AF recurrence in all the included studies while DAT of ≤ 1 year was correlated with lower risk of AF recurrence (RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.79); P < 0.01). Similarly, DAT of ≤ 3 years was correlated with lower AF recurrence risk (RR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.85); P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Evidence from observational cohorts suggests that the optimum time for ablation in AF patients is less than 1 year and a DAT of ≤ 1 year is linked to 24% lower chances of recurrence in AF patients, compared to DAT of ≥ 1 year.

Feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro, "apron-less" approach to repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures using radiofrequency energy after initial cryoballoon ablation

We aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of zero-fluoro approach for the repeat atrial fibrillation (AF) procedures after initial cryoballoon (CB) ablation. We have performed a retrospective study on patients that have undergone repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures in our institution since zero-fluoro program was initiated in 2020. All patients received CB ablation for the initial procedure. Repeat procedures were performed under conscious sedation and with intracardiac echo (ICE) and 3D mapping system - without the use of fluoroscopy and lead aprons. We have analysed in total 50 patients (76% male, 57.9 ± 10.2 years old), 50% of which suffered from paroxysmal AF. All procedures were successfully performed without the use of fluoroscopy. The mean procedure time was 93.9 ± 27.1 min and the mean RF time was 825 ± 468 s. The mean of 0.98 ± 0.91 veins was reconnected per patient and 36% of patients did not have PV reconnections. In all patients successful PV isolation was performed, confirmed by entry and exit block. No major periprocedural complications were observed. After the mean follow up of 12.5 ± 3.4 months: 68% of mixed AF population patients were free from AF after one year. In our cohort of patients, zero-fluoro, apron-less approach for repeat PVI procedures after index cryoballoon ablation proved to be feasible and safe. Index CB ablation resulted with low rates of PV reconnections and mid-term results after repeat procedures are favourable.

Temporal Trends in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in the Elderly: Incidence of MACE and Recurrence Rates

BACKGROUND

The elderly population with atrial fibrillation (AF) is growing. There is limited evidence to suggest AF ablation as an effective treatment for the elderly.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the temporal trends of first-time ablations in the elderly, the impact of age on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and a composite endpoint of AF-related hospitalizations, repeat AF ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs).

METHODS

Utilizing the Danish administrative registers, we incorporated individuals undergoing their first-time AF ablation from 2001 to 2020. Our cohort was divided into 3 age groups (<60, 60-74, and ≥75 years) and scrutinized across 4 consecutive 5-year intervals. Cox proportional-hazard multivariable analyses and cumulative incidences were used to evaluate the endpoints of 5-year MACE incidence and a 1-year composite endpoint of AF-related hospitalizations, repeat AF ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs.

RESULTS

Elderly patients who underwent AF ablation increased significantly, from none in 2001 to 9% in 2020. The 5-year incidence of MACE in the elderly decreased from 61.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-82.7%) to 38.1% (95% CI: 31.9%-44.2%). The HR for age ≥75 years in the last time period was 1.52 (95% CI: 1.26-1.83). The 1-year composite outcome varied from 35.6% to 52.0%; age was not a consistent predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

AF ablation use in the elderly has significantly increased over time. A notable decrease in MACE was evident across all age cohorts, with a particularly pronounced trend observed among the elderly population. Age was not an independent predictor of the composite endpoint.

Catheter Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: Recent Advances

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the leading cause of arrhythmia-related morbidity and mortality. Recurrent symptoms, hospitalizations, and cost burden to patients have necessitated treatments beyond antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) for patients with AF. Catheter ablation has proven to be effective over medical therapy alone; however the recurrence rates for atrial tachyarrhythmias post-ablation remain significant, particularly in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF. Hence, new techniques for catheter ablation have arisen, such as non-thermal energy sources, novel catheters, electroanatomical mapping, and ablation of additional targets. In this review, we discuss the recent advances in the field of catheter ablation, including newer modalities for the prevention of adverse events and future perspectives.

Treatment of atrial fibrillation with second-generation cryoballoon followed by contact-sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation for arrhythmia recurrences-results of a 5-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to report the long-term follow-up results of cryoballoon (CB) ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent second-generation CB ablation from February 2015 to December 2017 were included in our study. In all procedures, we used a 28-mm CB placed via a single transseptal puncture guided by intracardiac ultrasound. A 20-mm octapolar intraluminal circular catheter was used for intracardiac recordings. A single 180-s freeze strategy was employed. Repeated procedures were performed with a 3D mapping system and radiofrequency catheters.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients (69.8% male, mean age 57 ± 11 years), of which 77.0% had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), were included in the study. After a 5-year period, 52.4% of patients were in sinus rhythm without AF recurrence, off antiarrhythmic drugs. A total of 61.9% of patients were free of AF recurrence when redo PVI procedures were performed. When accounting for redo pulmonary vein isolation and antiarrhythmic drugs, a total of 73.8% of the patients were without AF recurrence in long-term follow-up. The patients who underwent redo pulmonary vein isolation procedures had statistically significant lower rates of AF recurrence (p = 0.006). In patients with PAF, long-term success rates improved from 62.9 to 79.4% for patients who underwent the redo procedure (p = 0.020). In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF), success rates went up from 41.4 to 55.1% for patients with single or repeated PVI procedure (p = 0.071). In the whole cohort, a total of 3 (2.4%) procedure-related major complications occurred which included persistent PNP, arterial pseudoaneurysm, and arteriovenous fistula.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a favorable long-term safety and efficacy profile of second-generation CB ablation. In the mixed paroxysmal and persistent population, up to 73.8% of patients remained free of AF recurrence in the 5-year follow-up, when accounting for redo procedures and AADs. Only 2.4% of patients experienced major complications of the ablation procedure, none with permanent sequelae.

Comparing simultaneous hybrid ablation with stand-alone thoracoscopic surgical ablation for the treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized controlled trial

AIMS

Advanced atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently a dilemma for electrophysiologists when choosing a minimally invasive treatment strategy. Previous studies have demonstrated the outcome of either catheter ablation or thoracoscopic surgical ablation (SA) is unsatisfactory in these patients. Whether hybrid ablation (HA) could improve outcomes in these patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of HA for the treatment of advanced AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A randomized controlled trial was designed to enrol patients with persistent AF (PerAF) and enlarged left atrium or long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF) who were randomized to HA or thoracoscopic SA at a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was freedom from any recurrence of AF off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) 12 months after operation. The primary endpoint was monitored by 7-day electrocardiogram monitoring devices. One hundred patients were enrolled. The mean age was 58.5 ± 7.6 years, and the mean left atrial diameter (LAD) was 50.1 ± 6.1 mm. At 12 months, freedom from AF off AADs was recorded in 71.4% (35/49) of patients in HA group and 45.8% (22/48) in SA group [odds ratio 2.955, 95% confidence interval (1.275-6.848), P = 0.014]. HA significantly reduced patients' AF burden (30.2% in SA group and 14.8% in HA group, P = 0.048) and the LAD (mean differences: -5.53 ± 4.97 mm in HA group and -3.27 ± 5.20 mm in SA group, P = 0.037) at 12 months after operation.

CONCLUSION

In patients with PerAF and enlarged left atrium or LSPAF, HA achieved better freedom from AF after 1 year of follow-up compared with thoracoscopic SA.

Long-term outcomes after hospitalization for atrial fibrillation or flutter

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter are common causes of hospitalizations but contemporary long-term outcomes following these episodes are uncertain. This study assessed outcomes up to 10 years after an acute AF or flutter hospitalization.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized acutely with a primary diagnosis of AF or flutter from 2008-17 from all public and most private hospitals in Australia and New Zealand were included. Kaplan-Meier methods and flexible parametric survival modelling were used to estimate survival and loss in life expectancy, respectively. Competing risk model accounting for death was used when estimating incidence of non-fatal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 260 492 adults (mean age 70.5 ± 14.4 years, 49.6% female) were followed up for 1 068 009 person-years (PY), during which 69 167 died (incidence rate 6.5/100 PY) with 91.2% survival at 1 year, 72.7% at 5 years, and 55.2% at 10 years. Estimated loss in life expectancy was 2.6 years, or 16.8% of expected life expectancy. Re-hospitalizations for heart failure (2.9/100 PY), stroke (1.7/100 PY), and myocardial infarction (1.1/100 PY) were common with respective cumulative incidences of 16.8%, 11.0%, and 7.1% by 10 years. Re-hospitalization for AF or flutter occurred in 21.3% by 1 year, 35.3% by 5 years, and 41.2% by 10 years (11.6/100 PY). The cumulative incidence of patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF was 6.5% at 10 years (1.2/100 PY).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients hospitalized for AF or flutter had high death rates with an average 2.6-year loss in life expectancy. Moreover, re-hospitalizations for AF or flutter and related outcomes such as heart failure and stroke were common with catheter ablation used infrequently for treatment, which warrant further actions.

The outcomes of concomitant catheter ablation in non-mitral valve cardiac surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of cardiac arrythmia, with a key importance in the perioperative setting of cardiac surgery. In recent years, the question as to whether pre-existent AF should be treated concomitantly when undergoing cardiac surgery has been heatedly debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to delineate the outcomes of patients undergoing concomitant AF ablation procedures alongside cardiac surgery.

Methods

The methods for this systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Four databases were searched, ultimately yielding 22 papers for inclusion, using appropriate search terminology. Meta-analysis using proportions or means, as appropriate, were applied. Kaplan-Meier curves were digitized and aggregated using previously reported and validated techniques.

Results

A total of 9,428 patients (67% male) were identified across the study period as having received non-mitral cardiac surgery and concomitant AF ablation procedures. On actuarial assessment, freedom from AF was found to be 93%, 88%, 85%, 82%, and 79% at 1 through to 5 years, respectively. Freedom from mortality was found to be 94%, 93%, 91%, 90%, and 87% at 1 through to 5 years, respectively.

Conclusions

This review demonstrated excellent freedom from AF out to a long-term follow-up of 5 years. Freedom from mortality was also encouraging. Emerging data are increasingly illustrating that in this patient cohort, concurrent treatment of pre-existent AF with cardiac and/or valvular disease at the point of operation should be the standard of care. Robust data in the form of randomized control trials will hopefully solidify this assertion.

Hybrid ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) has evolved significantly, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) becoming an established treatment. However, the outcomes following catheter ablation for persistent AF remain unsatisfactory. Hybrid catheter-surgical ablation has emerged as a therapeutic approach for persistent AF, combining the strengths of both interventions. The purpose of this narrative review is to comprehensively examine the current state of knowledge regarding hybrid ablation for AF.

Methods

A thorough PubMed search using the terms "hybrid ablation", "atrial fibrillation", "catheter ablation", and "guideline on cardiology" within the timeframe of 1980 to 2024 resulted in 138,969 articles. Consensus on the selected articles was reached through a series of structured meetings and discussions.

Key Content and Findings

PVI has demonstrated higher sinus rhythm maintenance rates, especially for paroxysmal AF. However, the efficacy is not as high for persistent AF. Additional ablation strategies, such as linear ablation, complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation, low voltage zone ablation as well as posterior wall isolation, lack consistent evidence of effectiveness. Hybrid ablation, involving collaboration between cardiac surgeons and electrophysiologists, presents a promising alternative for hard-to-treat AF. Recent studies report favorable outcomes of hybrid ablation, with atrial arrhythmia-free rates ranging from 53.5% to 76%, surpassing those of catheter ablation alone, which might result from better lesion durability or intervention for non-PV foci and left atrial appendage excision or closure during hybrid ablation. The rate of complications associated with hybrid ablation is higher than catheter ablation alone.

Conclusions

While favorable outcomes of hybrid ablation for persistent AF have been reported, it is not recommended for all AF patients due to its invasiveness compared to catheter ablation. Additionally, some patients with persistent AF maintain sinus rhythm with catheter ablation alone. More clinical data are needed to determine which patients are suitable candidates for hybrid ablation.