Transatlantic editorial: the use of multiple arterial grafts for coronary revascularization in Europe and North America

Comparison of Outcomes Between Total Arterial Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: a Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

An essential aspect of achieving early optimal outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the careful selection of conduits. Total arterial grafting (TAG) has been debated, and recent studies suggest its benefits, especially when combined with off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes of TAG in OPCAB versus on-pump CABG (ONCAB), using data from OVID MEDLINE®, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and PUBMED. Seven studies with a total of 5417 patients were included. Short-term outcomes showed no significant differences in perioperative complications between TAG-OPCAB and TAG-ONCAB, but TAG-OPCAB was associated with reduced short-term mortality (OR 0.48, 95% CI [0.26, 0.89], P=0.02), lower incidence of postoperative low cardiac output, atrial fibrillation, and MACCEs, as well as shorter intubation duration and hospital stay. Meta-regression did not reveal any associations between pre- or intra-operative variables and short-term mortality. In conclusion, TAG-OPCAB demonstrates favourable short-term outcomes and may be considered a safe and effective strategy in selected patients, while long-term outcomes remain inconclusive due to limited data.

Arterial conduits for coronary bypass grafting: the set-point concept

Endothelial cells control the vascular tone of arterial grafts used for coronary artery bypass surgery and react to changes in local shear stress. The vascular adaptations induced by endothelial cell activation affect the outcome of surgical grafts and can be predicted based on the set-point theory. In this Hypothesis piece, it is proposed that the set-point concept should inform surgical decision making for coronary artery bypass surgery.

Impact of Incomplete Revascularization on Long-term Survival Based on Revascularization Strategy

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the impact of complete revascularization (CR) and incomplete revascularization (IR) on long-term survival in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using multiple arterial graft (MAGs) or a single artery with saphenous vein grafts (SAGs).

METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2020, 12,625 patients underwent CABG and were divided into 4 groups: MAG CR (n = 1066), MAG IR (n = 286), SAG CR (n = 8360), and SAG IR (n = 2913). Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the generalized propensity score was used to minimize imbalance between the groups.

RESULTS

In the weighted cohort, median follow-up time was 8.35 years (interquartile range, 5.01-11.6 years). MAG CR was associated with similar long-term survival compared with MAG IR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.03; P = .084). SAG CR was associated with improved long-term survival compared with SAG IR (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84; P = .01). MAG CR was associated with better long-term survival compared with SAG CR (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.35-0.57; P < .001). Moreover, MAG IR was protective compared with SAG IR (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.85; P = .033). Additional analysis was performed comparing perfect CR vs imperfect CR vs IR in MAG and SAG patients, separately. In the weighted sample of MAG, there were no differences in the long-term survival between perfect CR, imperfect CR, and IR. However, in the weighted sample of the SAG cohort, SAG perfect CR was associated with improved survival compared with SAG imperfect CR (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.0.72-0.92; P = .001). Whereas, SAG perfect and imperfect CR were both associated with improved survival compared with SAG IR (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.0.35-0.87; P = .006 and HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.82; P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MAG CR is associated with better survival compared with SAG CR. If IR is inevitable, patients with MAG IR had better long-term survival compared with patients receiving SAG IR. Moreover, similar long-term survival is observed whether perfect CR, imperfect CR, or IR is achieved in the MAG population but not in SAG patients.

Subcostal bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting with the da Vinci Single Port system: an experimental feasibility study

We evaluated the feasibility of harvesting bilateral internal thoracic arteries with the da Vinci Single Port system (SP) through a single left-sided subcostal incision. Complete bilateral mobilization with sufficiently long conduits for multivessel grafting was possible in 2 human cadavers and 2 live porcine. Creating the subcostal access and docking the SP system took between 14 and 21 min and the total harvest time ranged from 65 to 125 min in all models. No major bleeding was observed in the live porcine and hemostasis was managed with the available instrumentation. One porcine deceased during surgery due to ventricular fibrillation followed by cardiac arrest. The robotic harvesting was technically easily reproduced by the surgeons and required no additional rib-spreading. Further studies will be required to assess if this subcostal approach with the da Vinci SP system yields true clinical benefits in patients.

Survival Benefit of Multiple Arterial Revascularization With and Without Supplementary Saphenous Vein Graft

BACKGROUND

It is unknown if the presence of saphenous vein grafting (SVG) adversely affects late survival following coronary surgery with multiple arterial grafting (MAG) versus single arterial grafting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective, observational, multicenter cohort study from 2001 to 2020 was conducted using the Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Database linked to the National Death Index. Patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with ≥2 grafts were included, and exclusions were patients aged <18 years, reoperations, concomitant or previous cardiac surgery, and the absence of arterial grafting. Demographics, comorbidities, medication, and operative configurations were propensity score matched between cohorts. The primary outcome was all-cause late death. Of 59 689 eligible patients, 35 113 were MAG (58.8%), and 24 576 were single arterial grafting (41.2%). Of the MAG cohort, 17 055 (48.6%) patients did not receive supplementary SVG (total arterial revascularization). Matching separately generated 22 764 patient pairs for MAG versus single arterial grafting, and 11 137 patient pairs for MAG with total arterial revascularization versus MAG with ≥1 supplementary vein grafts. At a median follow-up duration of 5.0 years postoperatively, the mortality rate was significantly lower for MAG than single arterial grafting (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.76-0.83]; P<0.001). The stratified MAG analysis found that MAG with total arterial revascularization had a lower risk of late death (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.91]; P<0.001) compared with MAG with ≥1 supplementary vein grafts. Sensitivity analyses produced consistent outcomes as the primary analysis. Following adjustment for the presence of SVG in the Cox model, the survival advantage of incremental number of arteries was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple arterial grafting has significantly improved long-term survival compared with single arterial grafting. A further incremental survival benefit exists when no SVG is used.

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Comparing the Long-Term Impact of Total Arterial Grafting With Multiarterial Plus Saphenous Vein Grafting

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes in a propensity matched population receiving total arterial grafting (TAG) and multiple arterial grafts (MAG) in addition to saphenous vein graft (SVG) following multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting requiring at least three distal anastomoses.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 655 patients from two centers met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: TAG group (n = 231) and MAG + SVG group (n = 424). Propensity score matching was performed resulting in 231 pairs.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of early outcomes. Survival probabilities at 5, 10, and 15 y were 89.1% versus 94.2%, 76.2% versus 76.1%, and 66.7% versus 69.8% in the TAG and MAG + SVG groups, respectively (hazard ratio stratified on matched pairs: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [0.45-1.77]; P = 0.754). Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) in the matched cohort did not show any significant difference between both groups. Probabilities at 5, 10, and 15 y were 82.7% versus 85.6%, 62.2% versus 75.3%, and 48.8% versus 59.5% in the TAG and MAG + SVG groups, respectively (hazard ratio stratified on matched pairs: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [0.65-1.92]; P = 0.679). Subgroup analyses of the matched cohort showed no significant difference between TAR with three arterial conduits compared to TAR with two arterial conduits with sequential grafting and MAG + SVG in terms of long-term survival and freedom from MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple arterial revascularizations in addition to SVG may yield comparable long-term outcomes in terms of survival and freedom from MACCE compared to total arterial revascularization.

Feasibility of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting using the da Vinci SP system

PURPOSE

We conducted this study to investigate the feasibility of mobilizing the bilateral internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) using the da Vinci SP through a single intercostal incision and to compare the amount of rib spreading with that required for mini-thoracotomy procedures. We also evaluated the construction of an intrathoracic T-graft anastomosis using existing instrumentation of the SP system.

METHODS

We harvested bilateral ITAs from two male cadavers via a single incision made in the fifth intercostal space using the da Vinci SP. A T-graft end-to-side anastomosis was created in one cadaver.

RESULTS

The bilateral ITAs were harvested in less than 60 min and a T-graft was completed. No additional rib spreading was required. Intraoperative adjustments of the da Vinci SP were necessary to maintain alignment with the surgical targets.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral ITA harvest using the da Vinci SP through a single intercostal incision was feasible, with less rib spreading than in mini-thoracotomy procedures. Thus, creating an intrathoracic T-graft with the existing da Vinci SP instruments is possible.