Early outcomes in 147 consecutive cases of subxiphoid single-port thymectomy and evaluation of learning curves

Perioperative outcomes and survival of modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy for T2-3 thymic malignancies: A retrospective comparison study

OBJECTIVE

Our previous study demonstrated that modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracic surgery thymectomy with an auxiliary sternal retractor is feasible for locally invasive thymic malignancies. This study aimed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes of modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy versus median sternotomy thymectomy for locally advanced thymic malignancies.

METHODS

In total, 221 patients with T2-3 thymic malignancies who underwent modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy or median sternotomy thymectomy between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled in our prospectively maintained database. A 1:1 propensity score-matching analysis was performed to balance the bias. Surgical difficulty was evaluated with a modified resection index. Perioperative and oncological results were compared between the modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy group and the median sternotomy thymectomy group.

RESULTS

There were 72 patients in each group in the final analysis. Our results showed that the modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy group had a shorter operative duration (98 vs 129 minutes, P < .001), less blood loss (40 vs 100 mL, P < .001), shorter drainage duration (3 vs 5 days, P < .001), shorter length of hospital stay (5 vs 6 days, P < .001), and fewer postoperative complications (5.6% vs 23.6%; P = .005). No significant difference was detected in complete resection (98.6% vs 98.6%, P = 1.000) between the 2 groups. Conversion occurred in 5 of 106 patients (4.7%). Survival analyses indicated similar recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.40-2.20; P = .883) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.05-5.02; P = .590) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery thymectomy was safe and effective for T2-3 thymic malignancies and could be an alternative for selected patients with locally advanced thymic diseases. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term survival of those undergoing modified subxiphoid approach thoracoscopic thymectomy.

Anterior mediastinal tumor surgery applying single-port thoracoscopy using the subxiphoid approach

Background

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of application of single-port thoracoscopy using the subxiphoid approach in anterior mediastinal tumor surgery.

Methods

Between June 2014 and June 2016, a total of 108 patients (59 males, 49 females; mean age: 64.9±7.5 years; range, 45 to 79 years) with anterior mediastinal tumors were randomized into subxiphoid (experimental) or right chest (control) groups. Single-port thoracoscopy using the subxiphoid approach was performed in the subxiphoid group, while thoracoscopy using the right thoracic approach was performed in the control group. Preand postoperative pain stress indicators, Visual Analog Scale scores, quality of life scores, postoperative tumor recurrence, and five-year survival rates were compared between the groups.

Results

There were no mortality or serious complications in either group. The mean Visual Analog Scale pain scores on postoperative Days 1 and 7 were 6.5±0.8 and 2.9±0.8 in the subxiphoid group, respectively, compared to 7.2±0.8 and 3.4±0.8 in the control group (p<0.05 for all), respectively. The mean quality of life scores on postoperative Days 1 and 7 were 81.5±5.0 and 79.3±7.7, respectively, in the subxiphoid group compared to 72.4±4.3 and 71.3±4.8 in the control group, respectively (p<0.05 for all). Postoperative pain and pain mediator indexes were lower in the subxiphoid group (p<0.05 for all). The postoperative tumor recurrence rates were 3.70% and 20.37% in the subxiphoid and control groups, respectively (p=0.008). The five-year survival rates were 85.2% and 63.0% in the subxiphoid and control groups, respectively (p=0.008).

Conclusion

Single-port thoracoscopy using the subxiphoid approach is technically feasible, safe, and effective in performing surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors with an intact capsule and a tumor diameter of ≤5 cm.

Safety and feasibility of a modularized procedure for trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to introduce an "eight-step modularized procedure (M-RET)" for trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). Its safety and feasibility were further verified in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 consecutive MG patients who underwent trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy at our institution between September 2016 and August 2021. According to different resection models, patients were divided into two groups: traditional trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy group (T-RET group) and eight-step modularized technique group (M-RET group). Baseline demographic characteristics and operation-related parameters were collected and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 41 (47.1%) patients in the M-RET group and 46 (52.9%) patients in the T-RET group. The M-RET group resected a greater amount of mediastinal adipose tissues and required more dissection time (median and interquartile range: 135.0, 125.0 to 164.0 v. 120.0, 105.0 to 153.8, P = 0.006) compared with the T-RET group. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of the intraoperative blood loss, duration of chest drainage, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications between the two groups. There was no mortality or conversion in each of the two groups and all patients recovered well upon discharge.

CONCLUSION

The eight-step modularized technique of trans-subxiphoid robotic extended thymectomy was verified to be a safe, effective, radical procedure, which offers unique superiority over ectopic thymic tissue resection.

Subxiphoid-subcostal versus transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy: A safe and feasible approach

Objective

Subxiphoid-subcostal thoracoscopic thymectomy (ST) is an emerging alternative to transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy. Potential advantages of ST are the avoidance of intercostal incisions and visualization of both phrenic nerves in their entirety. We describe our experience with ST and compare our results to our previous experience with transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy.

Methods

We conducted an institutional review board-exempt retrospective review of all patients who had a minimally invasive thymectomy from August 2008 to October 2021. We excluded patients with a previous sternotomy or radiological evidence of invasion into major vasculature. The ST approach involved 1 subxiphoid port for initial access, 2 subcostal ports on each side, and carbon dioxide insufflation. We used descriptive and comparative statistics on demographic, operative, and postoperative data.

Results

We performed ST in 40 patients and transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy in 16 patients. The median age was higher in the ST group (58 years vs 34 years; P = .02). Operative data showed no significant differences in operative times, blood loss, or tumor characteristics. In the ST group, we had 2 emergency conversions for bleeding; 1 ministernotomy, and 1 sternotomy. Postoperative data showed that the ST group had fewer days with a chest tube (1 day vs 2.5 days; P = .02). There were no differences in median length of stay, tumor characteristics, final margins, major complication rate, and opioid requirements between the groups. There has been no incidence of diaphragmatic hernia and no phrenic nerve injuries or mortality in either group.

Conclusions

ST is safe and has similar outcomes compared with transthoracic thoracoscopic thymectomy.

Simultaneous Comparison of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Wound Pain in the Same Patients Following Thoracoscopic Surgery

There is a lack of data comparing postoperative pain after subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pain is an individual’s subjective experience and, therefore, difficult to compare between different individuals subjected to either procedure. This study assessed reported pain at six postoperative time points in the same patients receiving both subxiphoid and intercostal incisions for thoracic disease. Data from 44 patients who received simultaneous combined intercostal and subxiphoid VATS were retrospectively analyzed from August 2019 to July 2021. All patients received the same length of subxiphoid and intercostal incisions with or without drain placements. A numerical pain rating scale was administered on postoperative days (POD)-1, POD-2, POD-Discharge, POD-30, POD-90, and POD-180. Bilateral uniportal VATS was performed in 11 patients, and unilateral multiportal VATS was performed in 33 patients. In the unilateral VATS group, there were no differences in pain reported for both incisions in the early postoperative period. However, in the bilateral VATS group, subxiphoid wounds resulted in significantly higher pain scores on POD-1, POD-2, and POD-Discharge (p = 0.0003, 0.001, and 0.03, respectively). Higher late (3 and 6 months) postoperative pain was associated with intercostal incisions in both groups, as previously reported, whereas higher early (day 1, 2, and discharge) postoperative pain was more associated with subxiphoid incisions than intercostal incisions in the bilateral VATS group.

Subxiphoid single-port thymectomy: six-year experience of a single center

BACKGROUND

The subxiphoid single-port approach for thymectomy has several advantages compared with conventional lateral transthoracic approaches. However, perioperative outcomes of subxiphoid single-port thymectomy are still lacking. The objective of this study is to present our 6-year experience of subxiphoid single-port thymectomy, including our learning curve.

METHODS

All consecutive 49 patients undergoing subxiphoid single-port thymectomy between August 2014 and September 2020 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

We analyzed data of 49 patients (27 males and 22 females) with a median age of 58 years (range 49-68). Two patients presented postoperative complications. The conversion to a different approach was required in four cases. The median follow-up time was 17 months (range 3-35) and locoregional recurrence was observed in one patient. There were no intraoperative deaths and postoperative mortality. The operation time cumulative summation learning curve analysis revealed that the curves descended from the 24th case.

CONCLUSIONS

The subxiphoid single-port approach for thymectomy is a safe and feasible modality with few complications.