Determination of selective antegrade perfusion flow rate in aortic arch surgery to restore baseline cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy values: a single centre observational study

Cerebral Protection Strategies in Aortic Arch Surgery-Past Developments, Current Evidence, and Future Innovation

Surgery of the aortic arch remains a complex procedure, with neurological events such as stroke remaining its most dreaded complications. Changes in surgical technique and the continuous innovation in neuroprotective strategies have led to a significant decrease in cerebral and spinal events. Different modes of cerebral perfusion, varying grades of hypothermia, and a number of pharmacological strategies all aim to reduce hypoxic and ischemic cerebral injury, yet there is no evidence indicating the clear superiority of one method over another. While surgical results continue to improve, novel hybrid and interventional techniques are just entering the stage and the question of optimal neuroprotection remains up to date. Within this perspective statement, we want to shed light on the current evidence and controversies of cerebral protection in aortic arch surgery, as well as what is on the horizon in this fast-evolving field. We further present our institutional approach as a large tertiary aortic reference center.

Optimal antegrade cerebral perfusion flow in patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection: A retrospective single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Systemic hypothermia with bilateral antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP) is the preferred cerebral protective strategy for type A aortic dissection surgery. The optimal ASCP flow rate remains uncertain and the target flow cannot always be reached due to pressure limitations. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between ASCP flow and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 140 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent surgery with moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest and bilateral ASCP between 2015 and 2021. Pearson correlation analysis was performed between ASCP flow and rSO2.

RESULTS

The median circulatory arrest duration was 46.5 (IQR:37.0-61.0) minutes. There was no significant correlation between ASCP flow and rSO2 for both the right (r = -.02, p = .851), and the left hemisphere (r = - .04, p = .618). The rSO2 values for ten patients who received > 10 mL/kg/min flow did not differ significantly from 130 patients who received 10 mL/kg/min or less for both the left hemisphere (p = .135), and the right hemisphere (p = .318). The ASCP flow was 5.1 (IQR:5.0- 6.5) mL/kg/min in five patients with, and 7.2 (IQR:5.8-8.3) mL/kg/min in 135 patients without a watershed infarction (p = .098).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no correlation between ASCP flow rate and rSO2 in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Furthermore, ASCP flow below 10 mL/kg/min was not associated with a reduction in rSO2. Definitive associations between ASCP flow and neurological outcome after type A aortic dissection surgery need further investigation.