AATS 2023: Left ventricular restoration with scar exclusion in the surgical treatment for ischemic heart failure

OBJECTIVE

Post-infarction myocardial scar as detected by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is associated with adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling and negatively affects the prognosis. We sought to analyze the impact of left ventricular restoration (LVR) with asynergic scar exclusion on long-term outcomes for patients with ischemic heart failure (IHF).

METHODS

From January 2005, 134 consecutive patients with IHF underwent scar-exclusive LVR. Among the 131 survivors, 108 patients had paired late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-CMR preoperatively and one year after, and represent the study population. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether their post-LVR residual percentage of scarred LV perimeter was <35% (%Scar <35; n = 55) or more (%Scar ≥35; n = 53). We compared the two groups, by looking at LGE-CMR outcomes, and at long-term survival and cardiac event (hospitalization for cardiac causes)-free survival.

RESULTS

Postoperative LV end-systolic volume index decreased significantly and ejection fraction increased with significant increase in stroke volume index (P < 0.05 for both). LV diastolic function of the left atrial volume index was significantly improved in patients with residual %Scar <35 than in those with %Scar ≥35 (P interaction = 0.005). Median survival in patients with residual %Scar <35 and ≥ 35 were 8.3 (4.5-12.2) years and 6.8 (1.8-11.8) years respectively (P = 0.106). Median cardiac event-free survival in patients with %Scar <35 and ≥ 35 were 8.0 (3.9-12.1) years and 4.8 (0.8-8.8) years respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Scar-exclusive LVR yielded sustainable improvement in LV function and favorable long-term survival regardless of the extent of residual scar. The LVR should be performed to attain scar exclusion in the surgical treatment for IHF, which in turn might protectively affect LV diastolic function and cardiac event-free survival.

[Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Current State of the Problem]

In this article we present discussion of the current state of the problem of surgical treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). The pathophysiological aspects of left ventricular remodeling in patients with ICM are also covered. A detailed characterization of methods for assessing the myocardial viability is given and their role in patients with ICM is shown. The problem of right ventricular dysfunction in ICM is discussed. Main attention is focused on the methods of surgical treatment of ICM. Limitations of the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) study are analyzed. The article is intended for cardiologists, general practitioners and cardiac surgeons.

A single center's experience with total arterial revascularization and spiral aneurysmorrhaphy for ischemic cardiac disease

The restoration of left ventricular (LV) geometry in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of ischemic cardiac disease remains controversial. We hereby present the experience of our center with total arterial myocardial revascularization (TAMR) and spiral aneurysmorrhaphy for ischemic heart disease. A retrospective analysis of 101 patients with advanced cardiovascular disease who underwent TAMR and spiral aneurysmorrhaphy was performed. Spiral aneurysmorrhaphy is a modification of the linear aneurysmorrhaphy and was applied to patients who had a LV aneurysm with a diameter of less than 5 cm. Peri-operative and in-hospital data were retrieved. The majority of the patients were male (87.13%) with a mean age of 63.1 years. Mean pre-operative ejection fraction (EF) was 35.7% ranging between 20 and 65%. An average of 3.23 grafts was required per patient. Early mortality was 6.93% (one intra-operative and six in-hospital deaths). Addition of concomitant valve surgery was associated with prolonged total operative, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time (p < 0.001), increased need for blood (p = 0.012) and plasma (p = 0.038), longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p = 0.045) and higher rate of post-operative cerebrovascular accident (p = 0.011). Furthermore, patients with a pre-operative EF between 30 and 50% had a shorter ICU stay (p = 0.045) and LoS (p = 0.029) compared with patients with EF <30%. Early mortality and post-operative complication rates following this combined procedure are in consistency with the relevant available data suggesting its feasibility regardless of the EF or addition of concomitant surgeries. Data from the follow-up of these patients are required to examine the long-term efficacy of this surgical modality.

Left ventricular reconstruction surgery in ischemic heart disease: a systematic review of the past two decades

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this paper is to systematically review the existing literature reporting on patients recruited during the past twenty years regarding the role of left ventricular (LV) reconstruction in ischemic cardiomyopathy in terms of efficacy and mortality and provide an updated overview of the current evidence.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The PubMed and Cochrane bibliographical databases were thoroughly searched for the following MeSH terms: "ventricular reconstruction" OR ventriculoplasty OR "ventricular aneurysm" OR "ventricular restoration." Original studies -recruiting patients during the past twenty years- on LV reconstruction surgery in more than five cases and reporting on the associated peri- or postoperative mortality were deemed eligible.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty-seven studies were included and provided data for 3220 patients with a mean age of 61 years. Angina was present in 66.6% (510/766) of the patients, while nine out of ten (635/699) had a history of myocardial infarction. Average preoperative ejection fraction was 29.9% and end-systolic volume index was 93.6 mL/m2. With respect to complications, low cardiac output syndrome and the need for intra-aortic balloon pump were prevalent in 9.3% (79/850) and 18.8% (334/1773), respectively. Thirty-day mortality was 7.1% (230/3220) and late-mortality (mean follow-up of 36.9 months) was 19.6% (548/2791), while the rate of MACCE was 40.1% (367/915). Five-year mortality was 29% (340/1171).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide a current perspective of the role of LV reconstruction in the treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy suggesting its benefit in survival. Taking into consideration the existing debate, further studies are required so that a solid conclusion to be made.

Prediction of Long-Term Survival in Patients with End-Stage Heart Failure Secondary to Ischemic Heart Disease: Surgical Correction and Volumetric Analysis

PURPOSE

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) may result in lethal conditions such as ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

We hypothesized preoperative LV volume would be highly associated with long-term survival in such patients. We retrospectively evaluated effects of LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) on survival.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into two groups according to LVESVI; Group S (n = 19, <100 ml/m(2)), and L (n = 55, >100 ml/m(2)). There were 74 patients (male 61, female 13; 61 ± 10 y.o.). There was no statistical significance in preoperative parameters, including ejection fraction (EF), severity of MR, severity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP). After operation, LVESVI and severity of MR were statistically reduced in both groups. However, EF, severity of TR and RVSP were not statistically alleviated in both groups. In Group S, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 93% and 48%. In Group L, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 50% and 29%. There was a statistical difference in long-term survival between two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative LV volume would be one of the risk factors for long-term survival in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to IHD. Careful follow-up and optimal treatment should be recommended before LV dimension becomes too large.