Late Outcomes of In Situ Versus Composite Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Revascularization

BACKGROUND

We compared 2 configurations for revascularization of the internal thoracic arteries to the anterior and lateral walls. In the "in situ" configuration, an in situ right internal thoracic artery supplies the left anterior descending territory, and an in situ left internal thoracic artery is grafted to the left circumflex territory. In the "composite" configuration, an in situ left internal thoracic artery is grafted to the left anterior descending artery and a free right internal thoracic artery is attached end-to-side to the left internal thoracic artery and supplies the lateral wall.

METHODS

We compared outcomes of all the patients treated in our center by the described strategies during 1996 through 2011.

RESULTS

Of 2951 patients, 1220 underwent composite grafting and 1731 underwent in situ grafting; the median follow-up was 15.1 years (interquartile range, 11.2-18.6 years). Early mortality (2.2% vs 2.0%, P = .787) and other early adverse outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Long-term (15-year) survival was marginally significant in favor of the in situ group (53.5% vs 49.5%, P = .05); this difference disappeared after 20 years. Configuration strategy was not a predictor for better 15-year survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.09; P = .568). An additional analysis compared matched groups of 995 patients each who underwent the 2 configuration strategies and found no differences in early outcome or late survival between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of 2 strategies for bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization to the left side, with comparable early outcomes and long-term survival.

Outcomes of left internal mammary artery with saphenous vein composite graft to bypass the left anterior descending artery: a propensity-matched study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of a novel strategy of using the in-situ left internal mammary artery (LIMA) with the great saphenous vein graft (SVG) to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods

A total of 979 patients took part in this retrospective observational study; 83 patients were propensity-score matched to the LIMA + SVG group and 83 to the LIMA − LAD group. Early mortality, postoperative complications, mid-term major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared among the two matched groups after the procedure.

Results

No significant differences in early mortality and postoperative complications rates were detected between the two matched groups. For mid-term outcomes, the incidence of MACCE was slightly higher in the LIMA + SVG group, but there was no significant statistical difference (14.9% vs. 12.8%, hazard ratio =1.20, 95% CI, 0.24 to 7.95; P=0.70) between the matched groups. Computed tomography coronary artery angiography (CTCA) images showed a LIMA + SVG composite graft patency rate of 94% (32/34) 25 months after the procedure.

Conclusions

Using the in situ LIMA with SVG to revascularize LAD was associated with comparable early and mid-term outcomes. These findings may provide an alternative emergency strategy when in situ LIMA cannot bypass LAD. Further study needs to be conducted to test longer-term outcomes.

Internal mammary harvesting: Techniques and evidence from the literature

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is one of the most commonly performed cardiac surgeries in the world. CABG using the internal mammary artery (IMA) remains the gold standard intervention for myocardial intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease. IMA harvesting can be performed with various techniques and approaches: pedicled vs skeletonized harvesting technique as well as approaches such as conventional sternotomy, robotic and endoscopic approaches. While each technique and approach have their respective advantages and disadvantages, evidence remains varied between cohorts. Traditionally, IMA has been used as an in situ conduit; however, IMA free grafts also provide satisfactory outcomes in certain situations. This literature review aims to explore the efficacy of different techniques and approaches of IMA harvesting and grafting. With evidence compiled, this will provide an overview of the complexity of CABG and locate gaps in current literature to direct future research.