Quality of life of patients with a colonic interposition postoesophagectomy

Development of a novel technique for esophageal reconstruction via oral-vestibule-enteral anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Narrowing, trauma, tumors, and systemic diseases can cause esophageal dysfunction. Severe cases resist traditional surgery, leading to long-term gastrostomy or jejunostomy tubes, affecting patients negatively. No established surgery ensures both airway and oral function with proper speech. This article introduces the oral-vestibule-enteral anastomosis (OVEA) technique, targeting patients with compromised epiglottic closure competence and loss of cervical esophagus, where conventional methods fall short.

METHODS

Technique description study evaluated in 13 patients in a single tertiary referral center in Mexico City treated with OVEA from January 1990 to July 2023.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients (69% male; mean age, 37.14 ± 12.907 years), preoperative conditions included a mean body mass index of 17.78 ± 2.66 kg/m2, 46% with previous abdominal surgeries, and 31% with a smoking history. After OVEA, complications affected 46%, primarily pneumonia (23%), abscess formations (15%), intestinal necrosis (8%), and airway fistula (8%). Reoperation was needed in 38%, addressing functionality loss, necrosis, stenosis, and jawbone remodeling. No fatalities occurred within the first 6 months after surgery; 84% had successful gastrostomy tube removal, and 8% retained a tracheostomy tube. Currently 13 patients (92%) use the OVEA as their main enteral route of feeding.

CONCLUSION

The OVEA technique seems promising for cases involving esophageal loss or impaired epiglottic function, enhancing patients' quality of life by enabling oral feeding and restoring regular eating habits. Further research should focus on long-term results and identifying optimal candidates for this innovative surgical method.

[Technique of Colon Interposition for Oesophageal Replacement for Oesophageal Cancer]

Nowadays, it is only relatively rare and in selected situations that colonic interposition is chosen rather than the stomach as a reconstructive organ for replacing the oesophagus. The colon is a reliable organ for tubular replacement of the oesophagus when the stomach is not available for reconstruction. Colon interposition is a complex and complicated operation. It requires a specific indication and thorough preoperative preparation. From a technical point of view, colon interposition places high demands on the selection and surgical dissection of the vascular supply to the reconstructed organ. The reconstruction route and elevation of the interposition graft to the proximal oesophagus and the need to create 3 or 4 gastrointestinal anastomoses also place significantly higher demands than reconstruction using a gastric tube. Overall, despite the significant surgery-related morbidity, good functional results and a good quality of life can usually be achieved. The surgical technique applied in our own practice is described in detail. An overview from literature on the results of colonic interposition is given, particularly with regard to surgical complications and quality of life after colon interposition.

[Technique of Colon Interposition for Oesophageal Replacement for Oesophageal Cancer]

Nowadays, it is only relatively rare and in selected situations that colonic interposition is chosen rather than the stomach as a reconstructive organ for replacing the oesophagus. The colon is a reliable organ for tubular replacement of the oesophagus when the stomach is not available for reconstruction. Colon interposition is a complex and complicated operation. It requires a specific indication and thorough preoperative preparation. From a technical point of view, colon interposition places high demands on the selection and surgical dissection of the vascular supply to the reconstructed organ. The reconstruction route and elevation of the interposition graft to the proximal oesophagus and the need to create 3 or 4 gastrointestinal anastomoses also place significantly higher demands than reconstruction using a gastric tube. Overall, despite the significant surgery-related morbidity, good functional results and a good quality of life can usually be achieved. The surgical technique applied in our own practice is described in detail. An overview from literature on the results of colonic interposition is given, particularly with regard to surgical complications and quality of life after colon interposition.

Internal Hernia Through a Mesenteric Defect Following Esophagectomy and Reconstruction With a Stomach-Preserved Ileocolic Interposition

Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for esophageal cancer and often involves the stomach as a substitute organ for esophageal reconstruction. However, we actively perform stomach-preserved ileocolic interposition because of its advantages in gastrointestinal function and the prevention of reflux esophagitis. Despite its benefits, few facilities perform esophageal reconstruction with ileocolic interposition; hence, postoperative complications following this procedure have rarely been reported. We present the first case of internal hernia through a mesenteric defect following esophagectomy and reconstruction with a stomach-preserved ileocolic interposition. This type of internal hernia after esophageal cancer surgery is a rare complication following a common gastric pull-up reconstruction. A 66-year-old Japanese female underwent esophagectomy and reconstruction with stomach-preserved ileocolic interposition for stage I esophageal cancer. One month after surgery, the patient experienced abdominal pain and vomiting. CT showed a dilated small bowel and a suspected postoperative adhesive bowel obstruction. Despite conservative management, the patient experienced recurrent episodes that required hospitalization. Although an exact preoperative diagnosis was not made, we decided on a surgical exploration six months after the first symptoms appeared. Laparotomy revealed an internal herniation through a mesenteric defect between the transverse mesocolon and the ileum mesentery following ileocolic interposition. We then repositioned the fitted small intestine and closed the mesenteric defects. The patient recovered uneventfully without a hernia recurrence. Minimally invasive techniques for treating esophageal cancer are becoming more common. As survival rates improve, the number of internal hernia cases, such as those described in this report, will likely increase. Therefore, more cases are needed to determine whether closing mesenteric defects can effectively prevent herniation. However, immediate surgical treatment should be considered based on the symptoms, even when a preoperative diagnosis is difficult.

Different gastric tubes in esophageal reconstruction during esophagectomy

Esophagectomy is currently the mainstay of treatment for resectable esophageal carcinoma. Gastric grafts are the first substitutes in esophageal reconstruction. According to the different tailoring methods applied to the stomach, gastric grafts can be classified as whole stomach, subtotal stomach and gastric tube. Gastric-tube placement has been proven to be the preferred method, with advantages in terms of postoperative complications and long-term survival. In recent years, several novel methods involving special-shaped gastric tubes have been proposed, which have further decreased the incidence of perioperative complications. This article will review the progress and clinical application status of different types of gastric grafts from the perspectives of preparation methods, studies of anatomy and perioperative outcomes, existing problems and future outlook.

Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is one of the malignant tumors with the poorest prognosis. Esophagectomy, which is the mainstay of curative-intent treatments, imposes excessive surgical stress on the patients, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates after esophagectomy remain high. On the other hand, the number of survivors after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer is increasing due to recent improvements in surgical techniques and multidisciplinary treatments for this cancer. However, esophagectomy still has a great influence on the fundamental aspect of patients' lives, that is, the health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), including their physical, emotional, and social functions in the short- and long-term postoperatively. HR-QOL is a multifactorial concept used to assess the symptoms and functional changes caused by the disease itself and treatments from the patients' perspectives. Therefore, assessing the HR-QOL of patients with esophageal cancer after esophagectomy is becoming increasingly important. However, the status of HR-QOL changes after esophagectomy has not been satisfactorily evaluated, and there is no worldwide consensus as to how the postoperative HR-QOL can be improved. This review aimed to raise awareness of healthcare providers, such as surgeons and nurses, on the importance of HR-QOL in patients with esophageal cancer after curative-intent esophagectomy by providing multifaceted information concerning the short- and long-term HR-QOLs, including the status of changes and the determinants of HR-QOL after esophagectomy, and furthermore, essential points for improvement of HR-QOL after esophagectomy.