Improving coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of adopting transit-time flow measurement

Transient time flow measurement in arterial grafts

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is one of the foundations of treatment for coronary artery disease. While it has improved substantially since its inception more than 50 years ago, including a rising use of multiple arterial grafting, intraoperative quality assessment is yet to be disseminated as an integral part of the procedure. Herein we review the fundamentals of intraoperative quality assessment in CABG using transient time flow measurement (TTFM) with a focus on its use in arterial grafting.

Identification of a Dissection Site in the Internal Thoracic Artery Using Fluorescence Imaging: A Case Report

A 66-year-old man with a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus who was undergoing hemodialysis presented with angina. Coronary angiography revealed triple-vessel coronary artery disease. He underwent multiple percutaneous coronary interventions due to recurrent restenosis and was referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The left internal thoracic artery and bilateral saphenous veins were harvested under general anesthesia. Four CABGs were performed: left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery; saphenous vein graft to the obtuse marginal branch of the circumflex artery; and saphenous vein graft to two sites in the right coronary artery. Intraoperative assessment with transit-time flow measurements showed no abnormalities, and the surgery was completed. On postoperative day seven, coronary and graft angiography revealed dissection of the left internal thoracic artery at its midportion with restricted flow. On postoperative day eight, a surgical intervention was performed to excise the dissected segment of the left internal thoracic artery. The dissection site was identified by fluorescence imaging. The dissected segment was excised, and the artery was re-anastomosed. The postoperative course was uneventful, and graft angiography performed on postoperative day 22 confirmed good blood flow. Fluorescence imaging was valuable in identifying the dissection site in the left internal thoracic artery.

Analysis of a multicenter registry on evaluation of transit-time flow in coronary artery disease surgery

Objective

The Evaluation of Transit-Time Flow in Coronary Artery Disease Surgery (EFCAD) registry aims to assess the influence of transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) in daily practice.

Methods

EFCAD is a prospective, multicenter study involving 9 centers performing TTFM during isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Primary end point was occurrence and risk factors of major adverse cardiac events, including perioperative myocardial infarction, urgent postoperative coronary angiogram and/or revascularization, and hospital mortality. Secondary end points were rate of graft revision during surgery and factors affecting graft flow. We respected the limit values set by the experts: mean graft flow >15 mL/minute and pulsatility index ≤5.

Results

Between May 2017 and March 2021, 1616 patients were registered in the EFCAD database. After review, 1414 were included for analyses. Of those, 1176 were eligible for primary end point analysis. Graft revision, mainly due to inadequate TTFM values, occurred in 2% (29 patients). The primary end point occurred in 46 (3.9%) patients, and it was related with left anterior descending artery graft flow ≤15 mL/minute (odds ratio, 3.64; P < .001). Graft flow was related with number of grafts (3 vs 1-2, β = -1.6; 4-6 vs 1-2, β = -4.1; P < .001; β > 0 indicates higher flow), and graft origin (aorta vs Y, β = 9.2; in situ left internal thoracic artery vs Y, β = 3.2; in situ right internal thoracic artery vs Y, β = 2.3; P < .001).

Conclusions

Data from EFCAD study suggest that TTFM is reliable to evaluate graft flow, and acceptance of inadequate flow on left anterior descending artery anastomosis influence postoperative outcomes. In our opinion, TTFM assessment should be routinely used in coronary artery bypass procedures, even if interpretation depends on learning curves.

The Algorithm for Using Transit-time Flow Measurement and High-resolution Epicardial Ultrasound for Intraoperative Grafts Assessment during Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Aim      To develop an algorithm for using ultrasonic flowmetry (USF) and epicardial ultrasonic scanning (EpiUSS) for intraoperative assessment of anatomic and functional viability of conduits.Material and methods  For viability assessment of 460 coronary grafts in 150 patients who were operated at the Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery (2018-2021 г.), markers of graft failure were analyzed using the USF and EpiUSS data confirmed by results of graft angiography. According to RОС analysis, the Qmean and PI values indicative of the graft failure were determined. A CHAID decision tree was developed for assessing the prognostic significance of the analyzed parameters. Based on this prognostic model, an algorithm was developed for intraoperative diagnosis of anatomic and functional graft viability during coronary bypass surgery.Results The Qmean ≤20.5 ml/min values were associated with an increased relative risk (RR) of detecting graft failure (RR, 8.2; 95 % confidence interval, CI, 4.4-15.2). The developed model shows a high accuracy of predicting the graft failure (AUC = 0.906±0.03). The RR of graft failure at PI ≥2.65 was 3.3 (95 % CI, 2.17-5.08). The prognostic model for PI (AUC = 0.745±0.042) was sufficiently accurate with respect of possible graft failure. Nodes of high and low risk for graft failure were determined in the developed decision tree. The obtained model was characterized by high sensitivity and specificity (100 and 84.3 %, respectively).Conclusion      The combined use of USF and EpiUSS allows a highly accurate assessment of both morphological and functional characteristics of graft flow. The developed algorithm for the intraoperative diagnosis of anatomic and functional graft viability can be recommended for clinical use.

Graft Flow Evaluation with Intraoperative Transit-Time Flow Measurement in Off-Pump versus On-Pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Objective

We aimed to compare transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) parameters for on-pump (ONCAB) and off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass procedures.

Methods

The database of the Registry for Quality AssESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery (REQUEST) study was retrospectively reviewed. Only single grafts were included (ie, no sequential or Y/T grafts). Primary end points were mean graft flow (MGF), pulsatility index (PI), diastolic fraction (DF), and backflow (BF). Unadjusted and propensity score-matching comparisons were performed.

Results

Of 1016 patients in the REQUEST registry, 846 had at least 1 graft for which TTFM was performed. Of these, 512 patients (60.6%) underwent ONCAB and 334 (39.4%) OPCAB procedures. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) during measurements was higher in the OPCAB group. After propensity score-matching, 312 well balanced pairs were left. In these matched patients, MGF was higher for the ONCAB versus the OPCAB group (32 vs 28 mL/min, respectively, for all grafts [P < .001]; 30 vs 27 mL/min for arterial grafts [P = .002]; and 35 vs 31 mL/min for venous grafts [P = .006], respectively). PI was lower in the ONCAB group (2.1 vs 2.3, for all grafts; P < .001). Diastolic fraction was slightly lower in the ONCAB group (65% vs 67.5%; P < .001). The backflow was also lower in the ONCAB group (0.6 vs 1.3; P < .001) with trends similar to MGF and PI for venous and arterial grafts. There were 21 (3.3%) revisions in the OPCAB group and 14 (2.1%) in the ONCAB group (P = .198).

Conclusions

ONCAB surgery was associated with higher MGF and lower PI values, especially in venous grafts. Different TTFM cutoff values for ONCAB versus OPCAB surgery might be considered.

Newly Developed Graft Failure Detected Using Computed Tomography Within 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: One Single-Center Experience

Background

Newly developed graft failure negatively affects the short- and long-term outcomes of patients who experience coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. This study explored the value of transit time flow measurement (TTFM) parameters for predicting the risk of newly developed graft failure that occurs within 1 year after CABG, as well as investigated the relationship between newly developed graft failure and adverse cardiovascular events.

Methods

A total of 134 patients who underwent CABG and had CT angiography (CTA) data (1 year post-operatively) were divided into two groups: the patient group, in which patients did not have newly developed graft failure, and the occluded group, in which patients developed newly developed graft failure between 1 and 12 months after CABG. The patency rate of grafts in different targets was analyzed. The correlations between graft failure and TTFM parameters and between graft failure and the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events were investigated.

Results

The overall rate of newly developed graft failure was 7.2%, the venous graft failure was 10.8%, and the arterial graft failure was 0.7%. The occluded group had a higher pulse index (PI) (2.9 vs. 2.4, P = 0.007), a lower mean graft flow (MGF) (20 vs. 25 ml/min, P = 0.028), and a lower diastolic flow fraction (DF) (63.5 vs. 70%, P = 0.019) than the patent group. The cut-off value for predicting newly developed graft failure was PI > 2.75 (P = 0.007), MGF < 23.5 ml/min (P = 0.03), and DF < 65.5% (P = 0.019). Compared with the patent group, the newly developed graft failure group had higher rates of recurrent angina (13.6 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.0014) and revascularization intervention (9.1 vs. 0% P = 0.026). However, there were no differences in death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction after CABG operation between these two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

A high PI and low MGF and DF are risk factors for newly developed graft failure. The patients with newly developed graft failure had higher rates of recurrent angina and revascularization intervention. TTFM parameters may be used to predict the occurrence of newly developed graft failure in patients after CABG surgery.

Intraoperative Assessment of Coronary Resistances: A New Quality Marker and Potential Tool to Predict Early Graft Failure after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

Intraoperative assessment of graft patency is pivotal for successful coronary revascularization. In the present study we aimed to propose a new, easy to perform tool to assess anastomotic quality intraoperatively, and to investigate its potential reliability in predicting early graft failure. Intraoperative graft flowmetry of 63 consecutive patients undergoing CABG were prospectively collected. Transit time flowmetry and its derivatives were recorded. Coronary resistances were calculated according to Hagen–Poiseuille equation both during cardioplegic arrest and after withdrawal from cardiopulmonary bypass. Angiographic evidence of graft occlusion at follow-up was cross-checked with intraoperative recordings. After a mean follow-up of 10.4 ± 6.0 months, 22 grafts were studied, and occlusion was documented in five (22.7%). Occluded grafts showed lower flows and higher resistances recorded during aortic cross-clamping. Coronary resistances, recorded during aortic cross-clamping, greater than 2.0 mmHg/mL/min, showed a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% to predict graft failure. We propose the routine recording of coronary resistances during aortic cross-clamping as an additional tool to overcome the acknowledged limitation of TTF to predict graft occlusion at 1 year.

Transit time flow measurement predicts graft patency in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting upon 5-year angiographic follow-up

Objective

This retrospective study sought to evaluate the efficacy of transit time flow measurement (TTFM) as a means of predicting bypass graft patency as assessed by coronary artery angiography upon 5-year follow-up.

Methods

Of 311 patients undergone isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery from January 2014 through December 2014, 202 (65%) underwent both intraoperative TTFM and angiography at follow-up. 610 grafts, 202 left internal mammary artery grafts and 408 saphenous vein grafts were checked. Any grafts that exhibited Fitzgibbon type B or O lesions upon angiographic evaluation were considered to be failing. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the optimal TTFM values for predicting graft patency.

Results

A total of 610 grafts were included in this analysis, including 202 LIMA grafts and 408 SV grafts, of which 107, 129, 129, and 43 anastomosed to DIAG, OM, PDA, and PLA, respectively. LIMA, DIAG, OM, PDA, and PLA bypass grafts had overall patency rates of 95.0%, 74.8%, 73.6%, 71.5%, and 74.4%, respectively, upon 5-year follow up. No significant differences in TTFM values (MGF, PI, and DF) were observed when comparing outcomes associated with individual or sequential SV grafting. MGF was found to be predictive of graft failure regardless of the target vessel (P < 0.05). While PI was found to predict LIMA, OM, and PDA graft failure (P < 0.05), it was not associated with the failure of grafts associated with DIAG and PLA vessels. Similarly, DF was found to predict OM and PDA graft failure (P < 0.05), but was not significantly associated with the failure of grafts associated with LIMA, DIAG, or PLA vessels.

Conclusion

LIMA bypass grafts were associated with better 5-year graft patency relative to SV bypass grafts. Similar graft patency rates were observed for both individual and sequential bypass grafts. MGF was able to predict bypass graft failure in patients that underwent off-pump CABG surgery.

Intraoperative transit time flow measurement in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease in the prevention of aortocoronary bypass graft occlusion

Aim. To study the parameters of transit time flow measurement (TTFM) for coronary bypass grafts in patients with diffuse lesions with different diameter of target coronary arteries.

Material and methods. The study included 150 patients with diffuse coronary artery disease. All patients underwent microscope-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), during which the TTFM parameters were evaluated. Depending on the diameter of target coronary arteries, patients were divided into 3 groups: group 1 included grafts to arteries ≤1 mm (n=101), group 2 — 1-1,5 mm (n=138), group 3 — ≥1,5 mm (n=308). Comparative analysis of TTFM parameters was performed.

Results. Mostly participants were male (76%); mean age was 62,9±7,6 years. During hospitalization, we recorded 1 death, 2 perioperative myocardial infarctions (1,3%) and 1 cerebrovascular accident (0,7%). TTFM analysis showed the worst hemodynamic parameters and a higher rate of suboptimal function in group 1; blood flow parameters were comparable in groups 2 and 3. The additional analysis in group 1 and combined groups 2 and 3 allows us to make an opinion about the negative impact of coronary artery diameter less than 1 mm on optimal blood flow through the grafts (odds ratio=2,1, 95% confidence interval, 1,2-3,8, p=0,011).

Conclusion. Diffuse coronary atherosclerosis with a diameter of target coronary arteries less than 1 mm significantly increase the risk of suboptimal graft function that requires considering more aggressive secondary prevention. TTFM demonstrate high effectiveness of microscope-assisted CABG in target coronary artery diameter of 1-1,5 mm and higher.

The Use of Intraoperative Transit Time Flow Measurement for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Systematic Review of the Evidence and Expert Opinion Statements

Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) allows quality control in coronary artery bypass grafting but remains largely underused, probably because of limited information and the lack of standardization. We performed a systematic review of the evidence on TTFM and other methods for quality control in coronary artery bypass grafting following PRISMA standards and elaborated expert recommendations by using a structured process. A panel of 19 experts took part in the consensus process using a 3-step modified Delphi method that consisted of 2 rounds of electronic voting and a final face-to-face virtual meeting. Eighty percent agreement was required for acceptance of the statements. A 2-level scale (strong, moderate) was used to grade the statements based on the perceived likelihood of a clinical benefit. The existing evidence supports an association between TTFM readings and graft patency and postoperative clinical outcomes, although there is high methodological heterogeneity among the published series. The evidence is more robust for arterial, rather than venous, grafts and for grafts to the left anterior descending artery. Although TTFM use increases the duration and the cost of surgery, there are no data to quantify this effect. Based on the systematic review, 10 expert statements for TTFM use in clinical practice were formulated. Six were approved at the first round of voting, 3 at the second round, and 1 at the virtual meeting. In conclusion, although TTFM use may increase the costs and duration of the procedure and requires a learning curve, its cost/benefit ratio seems largely favorable, in view of the potential clinical consequences of graft dysfunction. These consensus statements will help to standardize the use of TTFM in clinical practice and provide guidance in clinical decision-making.

Intraoperative surgical strategy changes in patients with chronic and end-stage renal disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

Factors such as more diffuse atherosclerosis, plaque instability and accelerated vascular calcification in patients with chronic and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) can potentially present intraoperative challenges in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures. We evaluated whether patients with chronic and ESRD experienced more surgical strategy changes and/or graft revisions than patients with normal renal function when undergoing CABG procedures according to a protocol for intraoperative high-frequency ultrasound and transit-time flow measurement (TTFM).

METHODS

Outcomes of CABG for patients with chronic and ESRD and patients with normal renal function enrolled in the multicentre prospective REQUEST (REgistry for QUality assESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery) study were compared retrospectively. The primary end point was frequency of intraoperative surgical strategy changes. The secondary end point was post-protamine TTFM parameters.

RESULTS

There were 95 patients with chronic and ESRD and 921 patients with normal renal function. Patients with chronic and ESRD undergoing CABG according to a protocol for intraoperative high-frequency ultrasound and TTFM had a higher rate of strategy changes overall [33.7% vs 24.3%; odds ratio (OR) = 1.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-2.48; P = 0.047] and greater revisions per graft (7.0% vs 3.4%; odds ratio = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.17-3.71; P = 0.008) compared to patients with normal renal function. Final post-protamine graft TTFM parameters were comparable between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with chronic and ESRD undergoing CABG procedures with high-frequency ultrasound and TTFM experience more surgical strategy changes than patients with normal renal function while achieving comparable graft flow.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02385344.

Intraoperative transit-time flow measurement and high-frequency ultrasound in coronary artery bypass grafting: impact in off versus on-pump, arterial versus venous grafting and cardiac territory grafted

OBJECTIVES

Despite society guideline recommendations, intraoperative high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) and transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) use in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not been widely adopted worldwide. This retrospective review of the REQUEST (REgistry for QUality assESsmenT with Ultrasound Imaging and TTFM in Cardiac Bypass Surgery) study assesses the impact of protocolled high-frequency ultrasound/TTFM use in specific technical circumstances of CABG.

METHODS

Three REQUEST study sub-analyses were examined: (i) For off-pump (OPCAB) versus on-pump (ONCAB) procedures: strategy changes from preoperative plans for the aorta, conduits, coronary targets and graft revisions; and for all REQUEST patients, revision rates in: (ii) arterial versus venous grafts; and (iii) grafts to different cardiac territories.

RESULTS

Four hundred and two (39.6%) of 1016 patients undergoing elective isolated CABG for multivessel disease underwent OPCAB procedures. Compared to ONCAB, OPCAB patients experienced more strategy changes regarding the aorta [14.7% vs 3.4%; odds ratios (OR) = 4.03; confidence interval (CI) = 2.32-7.20], less regarding conduits (0.2% vs 2.8%; OR = 0.09; CI = 0.01-0.56), with no differences in coronary target changes or graft revisions (4.1% vs 3.5%; OR = 1.19; CI = 0.78-1.81). In all REQUEST patients, revisions were more common for arterial versus venous grafts (4.7% vs 2.4%; OR = 2.05; CI = 1.29-3.37), and inferior versus anterior (5.1% vs 2.9%; OR = 1.77; CI = 1.08-2.89) and lateral (5.1% vs 2.8%; OR = 1.83; CI = 1.04-3.27) territory grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency ultrasound/TTFM use differentially impacts strategy changes and graft revision rates in different technical circumstances of CABG. Notably, patients undergoing OPCAB experienced 4 times more changes related to the ascending aorta than ONCAB patients. These findings may indicate where intraoperative assessment is most usefully applied.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02385344.

How to build a multi-arterial coronary artery bypass programme: a stepwise approach

Observational evidence shows that the use of multiple arterial grafts (MAG) is associated with longer postoperative survival and improved clinical outcomes. The current European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Guidelines on myocardial revascularization recommend the use of MAG in appropriate patients. However, a significant volume-to-outcome relationship exists for MAG, and lack of sufficient experience is associated with increased operative risk. A stepwise approach to building experience with MAG allows successful implementation of this technique into routine coronary surgery practice.

Predictive value of graft patency and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) based on Fourier transform (FFT)

Background

Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) is widely used in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG); however, its predictive value is unclear. We aimed to identify new factors to evaluate graft quality using fast Fourier transform (FFT).

Methods

Intraoperative and postoperative 2-year follow-up data of 114 patients undergoing CABG from January 2017 to December 2018 were collected. The TTFM waveform was transformed by FFT. Mean graft flow (MGF), pulse index, the amplitude of the main wave in FFT (H₀), the amplitude of the first harmonic (H₁), H₀/H₁, and the frequency of the first harmonic (P) were analyzed as predictors using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The overall graft patency rate was 80.3%, and the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) was 14.9%. The results demonstrate that compared with the graft failure group, MGF, H₀, and H₁ were higher, but H₁ and P were lower in the patent group. With univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, the decrease in H₀ and H₁ and the increase in P were independent risk factors for graft failure, while the decrease in MGF and the increase in H₀/H₁ were only statistically significant with a univariate analysis. In the cardiovascular events group, the increase in P was an independent risk factor. With a ROC curve analysis, MGF, H₀, H₁, H₀/H₁, and P predicted graft failure, while only P predicted cardiovascular events. None of the indicators showed predictive value for MACCEs.

Conclusions

TTFM waveforms after FFT can be used to evaluate graft quality and cardiovascular events, but have no predictive value for MACCEs.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Transit Time Flow Measurement: Graft Patency and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

This subanalysis of the Randomized On-Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial examined transit time flow measurement (TTFM) use and its impact on graft patency and long-term clinical outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

METHODS

Use of TTFM for ROOBY centers and surgeons was assessed. Comparative patient outcomes based on TTFM use included 1-year graft patency and 1-year and 5-year major adverse cardiac events: all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or repeat coronary artery bypass graft surgery).

RESULTS

Transit time flow measurement was used in 1067 patients (TTFM group) and not used in 501 patients (non-TTFM group); of the TTFM group, median percentage TTFM use was 79% (interquartile range, 41% to 98%) among 18 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, and 74% (interquartile range, 13% to 98%) among 48 surgeons. Patients were comparable in age (63 ± 8.5 years TTFM vs 62 ± 8 years non-TTFM, P = .30) and estimated 30-day mortality risk (1.8 ± 1.7 TTFM vs 1.9 non-TTFM, P = .53). One-year FitzGibbon A patency was 83% (1600 of 1988 grafts) for TTFM assessed grafts and 78% (629 of 803) for non-TTFM assessed grafts (P < .01). Fewer TTFM patients had an occluded graft (29%, vs 38% non-TTFM; P = .01). Comparing TTFM patients with non-TTFM patients, 5-year major adverse cardiac event rates were 30% vs 25% (P = .06). Individual component rates were 14% vs 11% for death (P = .06), 12% vs 8.8% for myocardial infarction (P = .07), and 13% vs 12% for revascularization (P = .62).

CONCLUSIONS

The association of TTFM use with graft patency and clinical outcome is uncertain. Future randomized studies that account for patient risk factors and practice variation would help address this knowledge gap.

[Role of intraoperative flowmetric assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts established on-pump]

AIM

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of three-stage measurement of the transit-time flow through coronary bypass grafts with the help of flowmetry for early verification of technical errors during on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an intraoperative analysis of 214 bypass grafts with the help of three-stage flowmetry. The first stage of measuring was performed on-pump with and without the proximal loop test, the second stage of measurement was performed after weaning the patient off the heart-lung machine, and the third stage of measurement was carried out after heparin inactivation prior to chest wound closure.

RESULTS

Amongst the 214 transplants regarded as functioning, intraoperative flowmetry revealed insufficient blood flow in 9 (4.2%) cases. Technical surgical errors were confirmed in these shunts during revision thereof. In 6 (2.8%) of the 9 such grafts we detected non-optimal parameters of flowmetry during the first measurement (while the heart was stopped); of these, in 5 (2.3%) cases non-optimal blood flow was verified with the use of the proximal loop test on the target coronary artery and in 1 (0.47%) case without it. In another one (0.47%) of the nine such transplants, inadequate blood flow was revealed during the second measurement, which confirmed technical errors in proximal anastomoses. In a further 2 (0.93%) of the 9 such transplants we observed low parameters of blood flow during the third measurement, which was related to kinking of the shunts due to their excessive length. All surgical errors were corrected immediately at the stage of verification thereof.

CONCLUSION

The strategy of three-stage assessment of flowmetry makes it possible to ensure and confirm adequate functionality of coronary artery bypass grafts at all stages of the operation, thus allowing timely verification and immediate correction of any technical problems with coronary artery bypass grafts.

Measurement, Analysis and Interpretation of Pressure/Flow Waves in Blood Vessels

The optimal performance of the cardiovascular system, as well as the break-down of this performance with disease, both involve complex biomechanical interactions between the heart, conduit vascular networks and microvascular beds. ‘Wave analysis’ refers to a group of techniques that provide valuable insight into these interactions by scrutinizing the shape of blood pressure and flow/velocity waveforms. The aim of this review paper is to provide a comprehensive introduction to wave analysis, with a focus on key concepts and practical application rather than mathematical derivations. We begin with an overview of invasive and non-invasive measurement techniques that can be used to obtain the signals required for wave analysis. We then review the most widely used wave analysis techniques—pulse wave analysis, wave separation and wave intensity analysis—and associated methods for estimating local wave speed or characteristic impedance that are required for decomposing waveforms into forward and backward wave components. This is followed by a discussion of the biomechanical phenomena that generate waves and the processes that modulate wave amplitude, both of which are critical for interpreting measured wave patterns. Finally, we provide a brief update on several emerging techniques/concepts in the wave analysis field, namely wave potential and the reservoir-excess pressure approach.

Death in low-risk cardiac surgery revisited

Background

A systematic review of low-risk death has been shown successful in identifying system weaknesses. The aim was to analyse early mortality in low-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to determine the cause of death, classify if they were unavoidable or potentially preventable as a result of technical or system errors.

Methods

We included all low-risk patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution from 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2019. In patients operated between 2009 and 2011, we defined low risk as an additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) I less than or equal to 3, and from 2012 and onwards as a EuroSCORE II less than or equal to 1.5. The medical records for the patients who died within 30 days of surgery were thoroughly examined and the cause of death was classified as cardiac or non-cardiac. Furthermore, deaths were categorised as not preventable, preventable (technical error) or preventable (system error).

Results

During the study period 3103 low-risk patients underwent surgery, and 11 patients died within 30 days of the operation (0.35%). Six of these (55%) were classified as preventable and five non-preventable. Four of the preventable deaths were classified as technical errors and two were due to system errors.

Conclusions

A repeated systematic review of deaths in patients with a low preoperative risk showed that a majority of deaths were preventable, and therefore potentially avoidable. Similar to the previous assessment at our unit, mortality was very low and failure to communicate remains a modifiable factor that should be addressed.

Peroperative epicardial ultrasonography of distal coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses using a stabilizing device. A feasibility study

Background

Widespread use of intraoperative epicardial ultrasonography (ECUS) for quality assessment of coronary artery bypass graft anastomoses during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has not occurred - presumably due to technological and practical challenges including the need to maintain stable and optimal acoustic contact between the ultrasound probe and the target without the risk of distorting the anastomosis. We investigated the feasibility of using a stabilizing device during ultrasound imaging of distal coronary bypass graft anastomoses in patients undergoing on-pump CABG. Imaging was performed in both the longitudinal and transverse planes.

Methods

Single-centre, observational prospective feasibility study among 51 patients undergoing elective, isolated on-pump CABG. Ultrasonography of peripheral coronary bypass anastomoses was performed using a stabilizing device upon which the ultrasound transducer was connected. Transit-time flow measurement (TTFM) was also performed. Descriptive statistical tests were used.

Results

Longitudinal and transverse images from the heel, middle and toe were obtained from 134 of 155 coronary anastomoses (86.5%). After the learning curve (15 patients), all six projections were obtained from 100 of 108 anastomoses scanned (93%). Failure to obtain images were typical due to a sequential curved graft with anastomoses that could not be contained in the straight cavity of the stabilizing device, echo artefacts from a Titanium clip located in the roof of the anastomoses, and challenges in interpreting the images during the learning curve. No complications were associated with the ECUS procedure. The combined ECUS and TTFM resulted in immediate revision of five peripheral anastomoses.

Conclusions

Peroperative use of a stabilizing device during ultrasonography of coronary artery bypass anastomoses in on-pump surgery facilitates imaging and provides surgeons with non-deformed longitudinal and transverse images of all parts of the anastomoses in all coronary territories. Peroperative ECUS in addition to flow measurements has the potential to increase the likelihood of detecting technical errors in constructed anastomoses.

Trial registration

The study was registered on September 29, 2016, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02919124.

Beyond patency: Functional assessment of adequacy using internal mammary artery grafting to the left anterior descending artery

INTRODUCTION

Arterial graft physiology influences the long-term outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We studied factors that can affect the overall resistance to flow using internal mammary artery grafting to the left anterior descending artery.

METHODS

This was a prospective, nonrandomized observational study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent elective on-pump isolated or combined valve surgery and CABG. Coronary stenoses were assessed using conventional and quantitative coronary angiography assessment. The flow and pulsatility index (PI) of the grafts were assessed by transit-time flowmetry during cardioplegic arrest and at the end of the operation. Fractional polynomials were used to explore linearity, followed by multivariable regression analysis.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis demonstrated higher flows at the end of the operation in patients who had higher flows with the cross-clamp on (P < .001), in males (P = .004), in patients with a low PI at the end of the operation (P = .04), and in patients with a larger size of the recipient artery (P = .005). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the graft flow at the end of the operation was significantly associated with the mean flow with the cross-clamp on (P < .001), sex (P = .003), and PI at the end of the operation (P = .003). Concomitant valve surgery did not influence flows. Male patients had 18 mL/min higher flow.

CONCLUSIONS

The graft flow at the end of the operation can be determined by the flow with the cross-clamp on, the PI with the cross-clamp off and coronary artery. We reported differences in the graft flows between sexes, and for first the time, we introduced the concepts of "adequate flow" and "resistance-to-forward-flow" for patent coronary grafts.

Transesophageal Echocardiographic Estimation of Coronary Sinus Blood Flow for Predicting Favorable Postoperative Transit Time Coronary Graft Flow Measurements: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Augmentation of coronary artery flow by surgical grafting increases coronary sinus blood flow (CSBF), which can be quantified on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). However, transit time flowmetry (TTF) technology remains the most used intraoperative technique for coronary artery graft assessment. The purpose of the present pilot study was to evaluate the predictive value of TEE-based CSBF estimation for identifying favorable TTF graft measurements.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty patients undergoing triple vessel coronary artery bypass grafting.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

CSBF was assessed on TEE examination before and after revascularization, estimating the percentage increase in CSBF (∆CSBF). Postoperative TTF graft measurements were averaged to compute mean diastolic filling (DF) and pulsatility index (PI). Subjects were grouped based on favorable (PI ≤ 3, DF ≥ 50%) and unfavorable (PI > 3, DF < 50%) parameters. The group with PI ≤ 3 (n = 32) had significantly higher ∆CSBF compared with the group with PI > 3 (n = 8) (38.22% ± 12.05%, 13.75% ± 3.37%, p < 0.001). ∆CSBF was higher in the DF ≥ 50% group (n = 35) (36.40 ± 12.99) in contrast to DF < 50% group (n = 5) (11.80 ± 2.59%). A strong negative and significantly positive correlation was observed between ∆CSBF with PI, DF (r = -0.903, 0.571, respectively, p < 0.001). A ∆CSBF ≥15.5% was found to predict a mean PI ≤ 3 and DF ≥ 50% with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 62.5% for PI and 100% and 100% for DF. A ∆CSBF ≥19% demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 100%, 100% and 91.4% for prediction of PI ≤ 3 and DF ≥ 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

TEE-based demonstration of an augmented CSBF can ensure favorable TTF graft parameters, guiding the adequacy of surgical revascularization.