THREE-DIMENSIONAL FEATURES OF DENTAL ARCH IN CHILDREN WITH OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

OBJECTIVES

Children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may have specific dental arch features, which may provide some guidance for early screening for OSA in children in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the association between OSA and dental arch 3-dimensional features in children and adolescents.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to April 6, 2024. Clinical studies assessing dental arch features in patients with OSA under the age of 18 years were considered for this review. A Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4 software.

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 466 subjects were included at the end. Meta-analysis showed that upper arch width and lower arch length were significantly reduced in the OSA group compared to the normal group (MxW1: MD = -1.45, 95% CI [-2.71 to -0.18], P = .02; MxW2: MD = -1.60, 95% CI [-2.24 to -0.96], P < .00001; MxW3: MD = -1.21, 95% CI [-1.80 to -0.62], P < .0001; MxW4: MD= -1.35, 95% CI [-2.37 to -0.34], P = .009; lower arch length: MD= -0.84, 95% CI [-1.23 to -0.45], P < .0001). No significant differences were found in upper arch width, upper arch length and palatal height between the OSA group and the snoring non-OSA group (MxW1: MD= -0.23, 95% CI [0.81 to 0.35], P = .43; MxW4: MD = -0.14, 95% CI [-1.09 to 0.80], P = .7; upper arch length: MD= -0.26, 95% CI [-1.05 to 0.49], P = .50; palatal height: MD= -0.82, 95% CI [-0.45 to 2.09], P = .21).

CONCLUSION

this review shows that OSA children tend to exhibit slightly narrower upper arches and shorter lower arches compared to normal children (differences between 1 and 1.5 mm). Snoring non-OSA children had similar dental arch morphology compared to OSA children. However, these findings need to be viewed with caution as they are of very low certainty and only cross-sectional studies were considered, and the corresponding differences may not be clinically significant.

Adenoid facies: a long-term vicious cycle of mouth breathing, adenoid hypertrophy, and atypical craniofacial development

Adenoid hypertrophy (AH) is characterized by pathological hyperplasia of the nasopharyngeal tonsils, a component of Waldryer's ring, which represents the first immune defense of the upper respiratory tract. The pathogenic factors contributing to AH remain to be comprehensively investigated to date. Although some studies suggest that environmental exposure to smoke and allergens, respiratory tract infections, and hormonal influences likely contribute to the development of AH, further research is necessary for fully elucidating the effects of these factors on the onset and progression of AH. AH is the most common cause of airway obstruction in the pediatric population, with a prevalence rate of 49.7%, and is frequently accompanied by various comorbidities. These patients often present with distinctive dental characteristics, including increased overjet, posterior crossbite, a high palatal plane, narrow dental arches, and facial features characterized by disproportionate alterations in facial height, commonly referred to as "adenoid facies." Individuals with adenoid facies frequently display abnormal breathing patterns, especially mouth breathing. The present review summarizes the findings of research articles sourced from PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science over the last 20 years up to September 2024. Several high-quality studies screened using the PICOPS framework reported that perioral muscle dysfunction, dental and skeletal malocclusions, and upper airway obstruction caused by AH are interdependent issues and mutually exacerbate one another. The review summarizes the potential associations and mechanisms linking AH, mouth breathing, and the subsequent development of adenoid facies in children.

Association between adenotonsillar hypertrophy and dentofacial characteristics of children seeking for orthodontic treatment: A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the dentofacial characteristics of children with and without adenoid and/or tonsillar hypertrophy.

METHODS

A consecutive sample of orthodontic patients aged 6-12 that took pre-treatment lateral cephalograms were included in this study. Those with history of previous orthodontic treatment, adenoidectomy or tonsillectomy, or craniofacial anomalies were excluded. The diagnosis of adenoid and tonsillar hypertrophy was based on Fujioka's and Baroni's methods, according to which the subjects were divided into four groups: the adenoid hypertrophy only (AHO) group; tonsillar hypertrophy only (THO) group; combined adenoid and tonsillar hypertrophy (AH+TH) group; and no adenoid or tonsillar hypertrophy (NH) group. Cephalograms were used for skeletal and dental measurement. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, LSD post-hoc tests and Chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 598 patients were included. Compared with the NH group, the THO group had significantly larger SNB angle (P < 0.001), as well as significantly smaller ANB angle (P<0.001) and Wits value (P = 0.001). The U1-L1 angle of AHO group was significantly smaller than that in the NH group (P = 0.035). The proportion of adenoid hypertrophy in Class II patients was significantly higher than that in Class III patients (P = 0.001). The proportion of tonsillar hypertrophy in Class III patients was significantly higher than that in Class I patients (P < 0.001) and Class II patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Over 80 % of children seeking orthodontic treatment had either adenoid or tonsillar hypertrophy. Children with adenoid hypertrophy tend to have skeletal Class II malocclusion, while those with tonsillar hypertrophy tend to have skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Anthropometric measures and obstructive sleep apnea in children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anthropometric measurements can be used to identify children at risk of developing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The study aimed to assess which anthropometric measurements (AMs) are most associated with an increased predisposition to develop OSA in healthy children and adolescents.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO #CRD42022310572) that searched eight databases and gray literature.

RESULTS

In eight studies with low-to-high risk of bias, investigators reported the following AMs: body mass index (BMI), neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, neck-to-waist ratio, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio, and facial AMs. The meta-analysis showed that the OSA group had an average of 1.00 cm greater for the neck circumference (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 2.26 [0.72, 5.23]), 3.07 cm greater for the waist circumference (p = 0.030; Cohen's d = 0.28 [0.02, 0.53]), 3.96 cm greater for the hip circumference (p = 0.040; Cohen's d = 0.28 [0.02, 0.55]), 5.21° greater for the cervicomental angle (p = 0.020; Cohen's d = 0.31 [0.03, 0.59]), and 1.23° greater for maxillary-mandibular relationship angle (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 0.47 [0.22, 0.72]) than the control group. The mandibular depth angle had a reduction of 1.86° (p = 0.001; Cohen's d = -0.36° [-0.65, -0.08]) in control than in patients with OSA. The BMI (p = 0.180), waist-to-hip ratio (p = 0.280), neck-to-waist ratio (p = 0.070), maxillary depth angle (p = 0.250), and upper/lower face height ratio (p = 0.070) showed no significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the control group, the OSA group exhibited a greater mean difference in neck circumference, the only anthropometric measurement with high certainty of evidence.

The dental and craniofacial characteristics among children with obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a sleep breathing disorder which may have dramatic effects on childhood behaviour, neurodevelopment, metabolism, and overall health in children. Malocclusion and craniofacial morphology may be related to paediatric OSA, and therefore provide information for clinicians to recognize, evaluate and treat patients with this sleeping disorder.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize evidence regarding the association between paediatric OSA and children's dental and craniofacial characteristics.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 1 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cross-sectional studies, comparing dental or craniofacial characteristics using clinical dental examinations or radiographic findings between OSA children (less than 18 year, diagnosed with overnight polysomnography) and healthy children, were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess the quality of included studies. RevMan software was used for performing the Meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were included. Meta-analyses showed that the overjet (MD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.51; P = 0.01), the saggital skeletal jaw discrepancy (ANB; MD = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.52; P < 0.00001) and mandibular plane angle (FH-MP; MD = 3.65, 95% CI: 2.45 to 4.85; P < 0.00001) were greater in OSA-affected children. In contrast, the upper molar arch width (upper first deciduous molar width; MD = -1.86, 95% CI: -3.52 to -0.20; P = 0.03), (Upper second deciduous molar width; MD = -1.06, 95% CI: -1.88 to -0.24; P = 0.01), SNB (MD = -2.10, 95% CI: -3.11 to -1.09; P < 0.0001), and maxillary length (ANS-PNS; MD = -1.62, 95% CI: -2.66 to -0.58; P = 0.002) were smaller in the OSA group.

CONCLUSIONS

This review shows that OSA-affected children tend to present with mandibular retroposition or retrognathia, increased mandibular plane angle and excess anterior overjet. However, these findings need to be viewed with caution as the corresponding differences may not be significant clinically.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020162274).

Three-dimensional orthodontic imaging in children across the age spectrum and correlations with obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine baseline facial convexity measurements in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) across the age spectrum.

METHODS

Polysomnogram, stereophotogrammetry, and biometric data were collected from children aged 0-18 years who were being investigated for OSA. Analyses evaluated differences in facial convexity according to OSA severity and other sleep parameters, while adjusting for age, ethnicity, and sex.

RESULTS

Ninety-one children, aged 0.05-16.02 years, met the inclusion criteria for this study. Initial analysis showed that the logarithm of age had a significant effect on facial convexity (P = 8.3·10-7) with significant effects of sex (P = 1.3·10-2), while excluding OSA. Ordinal logistic regression taking into consideration age, sex, weight, height, and ethnicity with OSA severity categorized as obstructive apnea-hypopnea index negative, mild, moderate, or severe showed that facial convexity was associated with OSA severity (P = 2.2·10-3); an increasing obtuse angle of convexity increased the tendency to be classified as having severe OSA.

CONCLUSIONS

Using three-dimensional imaging, we found an added impact of infancy on changes of facial convexity with age. While modeling could describe facial convexity without any OSA-associated sleep parameters, differences in facial convexity were present among groups with different levels of OSA severity adjusted for growth (age, weight, and height), sex, and ethnicity. The method provides a safer and cheaper alternative to other medical imaging techniques in children and holds potential for future use in studies of craniofacial structure.

CITATION

Tyler G, Machaalani R, Waters KA. Three-dimensional orthodontic imaging in children across the age spectrum and correlations with obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(2):275-282.

The impact of mouth breathing on dentofacial development: A concise review

Mouth breathing is one of the most common deleterious oral habits in children. It often results from upper airway obstruction, making the air enter completely or partially through oral cavity. In addition to nasal obstruction caused by various kinds of nasal diseases, the pathological hypertrophy of adenoids and/or tonsils is often the main etiologic factor of mouth breathing in children. Uncorrected mouth breathing can result in abnormal dental and maxillofacial development and affect the health of dentofacial system. Mouth breathers may present various types of growth patterns and malocclusion, depending on the exact etiology of mouth breathing. Furthermore, breathing through the oral cavity can negatively affect oral health, increasing the risk of caries and periodontal diseases. This review aims to provide a summary of recent publications with regard to the impact of mouth breathing on dentofacial development, describe their consistencies and differences, and briefly discuss potential reasons behind inconsistent findings.

Craniofacial features in children with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to evaluate the association between craniofacial features in children and adolescents with pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

Seven databases were searched to fulfill our research objectives. Clinical studies that included participants younger than 18 years with fully diagnosed OSA or without OSA and that evaluated skeletal, soft craniofacial features, or dental arch morphology were considered for this review. The risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed. A meta-analysis was performed when low methodological and clinical heterogeneity were detected. This review followed the protocols recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA-2020) guidelines.

RESULTS

Nine studies were identified at the end of the selection process, from which 5 did not report differences. Four studies reported differences between craniofacial features when OSA was compared to an asymptomatic control group. Mandibular retrognathia, reduced anteroposterior linear dimensions of the bony nasopharynx (decreased pharyngeal diameters at the levels of the adenoids), longer facial profile, and a narrower intercanine width were described among children with OSA. A meta-analysis was performed considering the studies with a similar methodological approach, and no differences were observed in all the considered cephalometric angles (SNA, SNB, ANB, NSBa, U1-L1, U1-SN). All the included studies were considered at low risk of bias even though some limitations were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the very low to moderate level of certainty, neither an association nor a lack thereof between craniofacial morphology and pediatric OSA can be supported by these data.

CITATION

Fagundes NCF, Gianoni-Capenakas S, Heo G, Flores-Mir C. Craniofacial features in children with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(7):1865-1875.

Is securing normal dentofacial development an indication for tonsil surgery in children? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Tonsil surgeries are common operations in the field of paediatric otorhinolaryngology. Often, the indication for these operations is hypertrophied tonsils. Paediatric sleep-disordered breathing and mouth-breathing are conventional situations caused by the hypertrophied tonsils. Both of these are further associated with dentofacial development alterations. Securing normal dentofacial development, or restoring it, is often used as an indication for tonsil surgery. In this review and meta-analysis, we assessed the contemporary literature to clarify whether tonsil surgery has an effect on dentofacial development in children.

METHODS

Studies with children aged 3-10 years who underwent tonsil surgery and were compared to non-operated controls using dentofacial parameters were included to the review. Search strategies were planned for specific databases. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis was performed when the data was methodologically homogenous enough to be pooled.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria for the review were fulfilled in 8 studies. The overall quality of the individual studies was judged to be moderate at best. The data were methodologically homogenous enough to be pooled for the meta-analysis in only 2 studies. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that tonsil surgery has a positive effect on the growth direction of the mandible (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is modest evidence that suggests that tonsil surgery has a positive effect on the dentofacial development in children with hypertrophied tonsils. Securing normal dentofacial development should be one component, but not the only one, when the indications for tonsil surgery in children are considered.