Survival probability of dental autotransplantation of 366 teeth over 34 years within a hospital setting in the United Kingdom

Advancements in tooth autotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Tooth autotransplantation (AT) involves the surgical relocation of a tooth from 1 site in the mouth to another site within the same patient. This approach is a good option in a growing patient when dental implant placements or fixed bridges are not suitable and when preserving natural teeth is a priority. Tooth AT is a complex procedure that requires specialized skills from a multidisciplinary team with careful patient and tooth selection and treatment planning.

TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED

The authors provided a review of the state of knowledge and research on tooth AT and presented a case scenario and barriers to adoption, with a focus on the United States.

RESULTS

Success rates for tooth AT can vary depending on several factors, including the patient's overall health, specific tooth involved, skill of the dental surgeon, and postoperative care provided. Long-term outcomes of autotransplanted teeth have been cited in the literature with impressive longitudinal follow-up spanning up to 26 years. Results of several systematic reviews showed survival rates from 75% through 98%.

CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Adoption of tooth AT has grown over the years, owing to advancements in dental techniques, improved patient outcomes, and increased awareness among both dentists and patients. Increasing awareness and availability of tooth AT to replace missing teeth can provide a natural and functional alternative to traditional prosthetic options. Tooth AT helps preserve the alveolar bone in growing patients and can offer excellent esthetic and functional outcomes.

Survival of retained permanent canines after autotransplantation: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

After third molars, canines are the teeth most commonly affected by displacement and impaction. Although orthodontic surgical treatment represents the standard method for realignment of canines, autotransplantation (autoTX) functions as the second-line therapy if orthodontic alignment does not succeed in treating impaction and severe displacement. This retrospective cohort study aimed to identify clinical predictors for postoperative survival and endodontic treatment needs after autoTX of severely displaced and impacted canines.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised patients who received canine autoTX in a single surgical center between 2006 and 2018. Canines with severe displacement and retention were surgically treated using a standardized protocol. Statistical analysis of survival probability was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method, and bivariate data were analyzed using logistic regression and the Pearson chi-square test. Nonparametric continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Data from 319 patients with 378 canine grafts were available for analysis after a mean follow-up of 54.7 ± 36.5 months on the patient level (range, 0.3-181.8 months). With 25 lost autotransplants, the cumulative survival rate was 93.4%. Patient age at surgery, the state of the apical foramen, endodontic treatment need, and persistence of deciduous teeth at the implantation site had a significant negative impact on autotransplant survival (P <0.05). Endodontic treatment need was significantly related to the patient's age at surgery, the state of the apical foramen, and preoperative orthodontic traction (P <0.05). Thus, these independent variables were identified as clinical predictors for the survival of both the autotransplant and the dental pulp. Gender, ischemia time, postoperative ankylosis, or site of autoTX did not influence any of the outcome variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The high survival rates of autotransplanted permanent canines make this treatment a promising option, especially in patients with severe tooth displacement, in which orthodontic treatment alone cannot provide predictable alignment, irrespective of the patient's age. Interpreting age and preoperative orthodontic traction as delaying the onset of autoTX and state of apex, time-dependent aspects seem to be of great importance for postoperative complications leading to endodontic treatment or graft loss. Therefore, early implementation of autoTX as a treatment modality for impacted, severely displaced, and vain exposed canines in daily surgical practice should be encouraged.

The outcomes of auto-transplanted premolars in the anterior maxilla following traumatic dental injuries

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Tooth auto-transplantation is a treatment option, which is often not considered to replace anterior maxillary incisors in children and adolescents. There are multiple prognostic factors that may influence the outcomes of premolar auto-transplantation, but there is limited evidence from human studies. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of auto-transplanted premolars in the anterior maxilla following traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) and to identify their prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical records of patients who had premolars transplanted in the anterior maxilla following TDI, with appropriate radiographs and a minimal of 1-year follow-up, were reviewed retrospectively. A specific data extraction form was developed, tested and used to collect information for the prognostic factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort included 120 patients with 144 auto-transplanted premolars. The mean age was 12.2 years (±2.0), and the mean observation period was 3.7 years (±1.8). The success rate was 80%, and the survival rate was 93%. Unfavourable outcomes included external replacement resorption in 12.5%, uncontrolled external inflammatory resorption in 2.7%, and both resorption types in 4.9% of teeth. Periodontal healing was significantly associated with donor tooth root maturity, graft handling at the time of surgery including ease of donor tooth extraction and placement at the recipient sites, recipient site alveolar bone status, and post-operative transplant mobility. Seventy-four teeth (53.4%) were immature at the time of transplantation where pulp revascularisation was anticipated, and 52 (70%) of those had radiographic and clinical signs of pulp healing. Pulp healing was significantly related to donor tooth eruption stage, ease of extraction of donor tooth, and ease of placement in the recipient site.

CONCLUSIONS

Good outcomes were observed for premolar teeth auto-transplanted in the anterior maxilla. The main prognostic factors were ease of extraction of donor tooth and ease of placement in the recipient sites and donor tooth root maturity.

What Are the Complications, Success and Survival Rates for Autotransplanted Teeth? An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses

Background: Autotransplantation is the surgical repositioning of a tooth within the same patient. It can be thought of as the controlled avulsion and re-implantation of a tooth and can be a viable alternative to other dental rehabilitation options. This review aimed to evaluate the survival rate (SR), major complications such as ankylosis rate (AR) and infection-related root resorption (RR), and overall success and failure rate (FR) in autotransplanted teeth. Methods: Six databases were accessed up to January 2021 to obtain all systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs and MAs). Study selection: After title and abstract reading, data extraction was performed from eligible SRs. The methodological quality was calculated for the included SRs using the risk of bias in systematic reviews (ROBIS) tool. Results: Six SRs were included in this review. The overall failure rate ranged from as low as 2.0% to 10.32%. The 1-year survival was very high (97.4–98.0%). The 5-year survival rate ranged from 81 to 98.2%. Major complications of AR ranged from 1.2 to 6.2%, and RR ranged from 2.1 to 10.4%. Conclusion: The overall findings from these SR and MA are promising; however, all the SRs include only single-arm prospective or retrospective studies, the SRs are of overall low methodological quality, and for the heterogeneity of the included SRs, well-designed comparative studies with a long-term follow-up are recommended.