Influence of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on exercise performance and clinical symptoms in chronic heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Drugs of Muscle Wasting and Their Therapeutic Targets

Muscle wasting and weakness such as cachexia, atrophy, and sarcopenia are characterized by marked decreases in the protein content, myonuclear number, muscle fiber size, and muscle strength. This chapter focuses on the recent advances of pharmacological approach for attenuating muscle wasting.A myostatin-inhibiting approach is very intriguing to prevent sarcopenia but not muscular dystrophy in humans. Supplementation with ghrelin is also an important candidate to combat sarcopenia as well as cachexia. Treatment with soy isoflavone, trichostatin A (TSA), and cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox2) inhibitors seems to be effective modulators attenuating muscle wasting, although further systematic research is needed on this treatment in particular concerning side effects.

Frailty in Advanced Heart Failure: A Consequence of Aging or a Separate Entity?

There are over 5 million Americans with heart failure (HF), the majority of whom are over age 65. Frailty is a systemic syndrome associated with aging that produces subclinical dysfunction across multiple organ systems and leads to an increased risk for morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of frailty is about 10% in community-dwelling elderly and 20% in those with advanced HF, and increases in both cohorts with age. Yet the relationship between the primary frailty of aging and frailty secondary to HF remains poorly defined. Whether the frailty of these two populations share similar etiologies or exist as separate entities is unknown. Teasing apart potential molecular, cellular, and functional differences between the frailty of aging and that of advanced HF has implications for risk stratification, quality of life, and pharmacological and therapeutic interventions for advanced HF patients.

Novel intriguing strategies attenuating to sarcopenia

Sarcopenia, the age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass, is characterized by a deterioration of muscle quantity and quality leading to a gradual slowing of movement, a decline in strength and power, increased risk of fall-related injury, and, often, frailty. Since sarcopenia is largely attributed to various molecular mediators affecting fiber size, mitochondrial homeostasis, and apoptosis, the mechanisms responsible for these deleterious changes present numerous therapeutic targets for drug discovery. Resistance training combined with amino acid-containing supplements is often utilized to prevent age-related muscle wasting and weakness. In this review, we summarize more recent therapeutic strategies (myostatin or proteasome inhibition, supplementation with eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or ursolic acid, etc.) for counteracting sarcopenia. Myostatin inhibitor is the most advanced research with a Phase I/II trial in muscular dystrophy but does not try the possibility for attenuating sarcopenia. EPA and ursolic acid seem to be effective as therapeutic agents, because they attenuate the degenerative symptoms of muscular dystrophy and cachexic muscle. The activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α) in skeletal muscle by exercise and/or unknown supplementation would be an intriguing approach to attenuating sarcopenia. In contrast, muscle loss with age may not be influenced positively by treatment with a proteasome inhibitor or antioxidant.

Optimal management of sarcopenia

Sarcopenia is the progressive generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function which occurs as a consequence of aging. With a growing older population, there has been great interest in developing approaches to counteract the effects of sarcopenia, and thereby reduce the age-related decline and disability. This paper reviews (1) the mechanisms of sarcopenia, (2) the diagnosis of sarcopenia, and (3) the potential interventions for sarcopenia. Multiple factors appear to be involved in the development of sarcopenia including the loss of muscle mass and muscle fibers, increased inflammation, altered hormonal levels, poor nutritional status, and altered renin-angiotensin system. The lack of diagnostic criteria to identify patients with sarcopenia hinders potential management options. To date, pharmacological interventions have shown limited efficacy in counteracting the effects of sarcopenia. Recent evidence has shown benefits with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; however, further randomized controlled trials are required. Resistance training remains the most effective intervention for sarcopenia; however, older people maybe unable or unwilling to embark on strenuous exercise training programs.

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on functional class in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction-a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on symptoms in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is controversial.

AIMS

To perform a meta-analysis of studies evaluating effect of ACE inhibitors on New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in patients with LVSD.

METHODS

Individual data from 10389 patients in NYHA classes I-IV from four large long-term studies (2-4-year follow-up) and summary data from 2302 patients in NYHA classes II-IV from 16 short-term studies (3 months follow-up) were meta-analysed to assess changes in NYHA class.

RESULTS

The large long-term studies showed a significant improvement in the worst NYHA classes (classes II-IV compared to class I) in the ACE inhibitor arm versus placebo, odds ratio (OR) = 0.875 (0.811-0.943) p = 0.0005. This effect was only present in studies which included patients with chronic heart failure and was particularly pronounced on deterioration to the worst NYHA class IV, OR = 0.66 (0.52-0.84) p = 0.001. There was no effect in the studies which included patients after myocardial infarction. The short-term chronic heart failure studies showed a significant improvement in NYHA class; OR for improvement of at least one NYHA class was 2.11 (1.48-2.98, 95% CI) p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION

ACE inhibition significantly improves symptomatic status measured as NYHA classification in patients with chronic heart failure.

A meta-analysis of the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on functional capacity in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction

AIM

To determine by meta-analysis whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors improve exercise tolerance in patients with symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After literature search 13 multi-centre double blind parallel group trials that evaluated the effect of ACE inhibitors vs. placebo on exercise duration were selected. Ninety-four percent of patients were in New York Heart Association class II-IV. The studies were combined using the Cochrane meta-analysis program (Review manager version 4.1). Analyses according to treatment period, exercise protocols and publication periods were performed. Treatment with ACE inhibitor over 4-12 weeks resulted in a beneficial effect on exercise duration (P=0.003 and P=0.0008 for 4- and 12-weeks treatment, respectively), but the magnitude of improvements did not exceed 30 s corresponding to only 5% compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the pronounced effect on mortality and morbidity in patients with symptomatic LVSD, ACE inhibitors have improving effect on functional capacity measured as exercise tolerance time.

[Evidence based medical treatment of heart failure]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Recommendations for the treatment of heart failure were carried out by a systematic review of the available evidence of the different pharmacologic treatments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The review focused on the treatment of chronic and systolic heart failure. All the studies published in english about the pharmacologic treatment of heart failure where identified. The evidence of every pharmacologic treatment was classified according to: a) efficacy variables (reduction of mortality and hospitalizations, improvement of functional class, ejection fraction and exercise tolerance), and b) the level of quality of the evidence according to an evaluation scale. The evidence was also reviewed for the comparisons and the combinations of the pharmacologic treatments, as well as for the toxicity and costs of treatments.

RESULTS

The recommendations were defined according to the NYHA functional class and were classified in the A, B and C categories according to the level of quality of the available evidence. The evidence on mortality was considered the most important. First line drugs, the alternatives and other possible treatments were take into account.

CONCLUSIONS

There is enough evidence based on information about some variables such as reduction of mortality or hospitalizations to carry out treatment recommendations in all stages of heart failure. This point out the interest ant the priority of used them in the evaluation and improvement of the results of heart failure.

Combined treatment with losartan and an ACE inhibitor in mild to moderate heart failure: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although the beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with heart failure are well recognized, there are theoretical advantages in combining ACE inhibition with angiotensin (AT)1 receptor antagonism.

METHODS

Twenty patients with mild to moderate heart failure and maximally treated with an ACE inhibitor were randomly assigned to losartan or placebo. Patients underwent repeated assessment of exercise tolerance, quality of life, central and regional hemodynamics, and neurohumoral and biochemical parameters over a period of 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Losartan treatment was well tolerated in terms of adverse events, heart rate, and blood pressure response, and there were no significant changes in serum creatinine or potassium. After 12 weeks of treatment, no significant differences were observed between the losartan and placebo groups in exercise tolerance, quality of life, central and regional hemodynamics, or neurohumoral parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild to moderate heart failure already maximally treated with an ACE inhibitor, additional treatment with losartan is well tolerated, but we have not observed any significant improvement in exercise capacity, quality of life, central and regional hemodynamics, or neurohormones. Our data suggest that the combination of losartan with an ACE inhibitor does not offer any substantial advantages over treatment with an ACE inhibitor alone in these patients.

The Effects of Sublingual Administration of Captopril on Parameters of Exercise Test and Neurohormonal Activation in Patients With Stable Angina Pectoris

A prospective randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study was designed to investigate the effects of sublingual administration of captopril on the parameters of exercise test and neurohormonal activation in patients with stable angina pectoris. A total of 31 patients (28 male, 3 female; mean age 55.4 +/- 9.4 years) took part in the study. Coronary angiography and left ventriculography were performed in all cases and the patients were classified according to the ejection fraction (EF). Following sublingual placebo or 25 mg captopril, plasma levels of renin, angiotensin II, norepinephrine, and serum aldosterone levels were measured at rest and maximal exercise. test was performed. Hormone levels were remeasured immediately after the exercise. The same procedure was repeated the next day using captopril or placebo. Sublingual captopril administration increased the time to angina, the time to 1 mm ST depression, maximal exercise capacity, maximal exercise duration and decreased maximal ST depression, maximal systolic blood pressure, and maximal double product (p < 0.001-0.01). After the maximal exercise test following captopril, the % difference of angiotensin II, aldosterone, and norepinephrine levels was found to be significant lower and the % difference of the renin level was found to be significantly higher than those of placebo (p < 0.001). The effects of sublingual captopril on exercise parameters were additionally assessed in different left ventricular systolic function subgroups. The favorable effects were more prominent in cases with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. There were no adverse effects related to sublingual captopril use. As a result, sublingual administration of captopril improved the parameters of maximal exercise test and suppressed the neurohormonal activation during exercise. We suggest that sublingual captopril may be used effectively before planned daily activities in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Neuroendocrine activation after myocardial infarction: causes and consequences

Images

Clinical benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in chronic heart failure

The ideal therapy for patients with chronic heart failure should reduce symptoms related to pulmonary congestion or low perfusion, prevent the progression of left ventricular dysfunction and, ultimately, should reduce mortality. Extensive studies in humans have investigated the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on these goals of therapy. As an example, the ACE inhibitor cilazapril significantly improved exercise tolerance, as borne out by a meta-analysis of six placebo-controlled, randomized 3-month trials. Comparison of the effects of cilazapril and captopril vs. placebo in one of the trials documented similar improvement in exercise tolerance (14 vs. 17%). Results from other randomized comparative trials suggest that the improvement in symptoms represents a class effect of ACE inhibitors. A beneficial effect of ACE inhibition on the progression of left ventricular dysfunction has also been demonstrated in the SOLVD trial, and a reduction of mortality has been amply documented in several mortality trials (CONSENSUS I, SOLVD, V-HeFT-II, SAVE, AIRE, SMILE) in patients with or without preceding myocardial infarction. Reports that ACE inhibitors also reduce the incidence of reinfarction after myocardial infarction have not been confirmed in all studies but raise the interesting concept that ACE inhibition may interact, in a beneficial but thus far not well-understood way, with key processes in the development of atherosclerosis, thereby preventing plaque rupture, thrombus formation, and myocardial infarction. Taken together, a large database convincingly demonstrates that ACE inhibitors are effective not only in improving symptoms but also in the prevention of progression of left ventricular dysfunction, in the reduction of mortality, and possibly in stabilizing the atherosclerotic disease process.