The cardiac sarcoidosis consortium: elucidating a mysterious disease through collaborative research

Big data in sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides an overview of recent advancements in sarcoidosis research, focusing on collaborative networks, phenotype characterization, and molecular studies. It highlights the importance of collaborative efforts, phenotype characterization, and the integration of multilevel molecular data for advancing sarcoidosis research and paving the way toward personalized medicine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sarcoidosis exhibits heterogeneous clinical manifestations influenced by various factors. Efforts to define sarcoidosis endophenotypes show promise, while technological advancements enable extensive molecular data generation. Collaborative networks and biobanks facilitate large-scale studies, enhancing biomarker discovery and therapeutic protocols.

SUMMARY

Sarcoidosis presents a complex challenge due to its unknown cause and heterogeneous clinical manifestations. Collaborative networks, comprehensive phenotype delineation, and the utilization of cutting-edge technologies are essential for advancing our understanding of sarcoidosis biology and developing personalized medicine approaches. Leveraging large-scale epidemiological resources and biobanks and integrating multilevel molecular data offer promising avenues for unraveling the disease's heterogeneity and improving patient outcomes.

Diagnostics, treatment and outcomes of cardiac sarcoidosis in a Norwegian cohort

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidelines for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) regarding use of second- and third-line agents, treatment duration, surveillance and prognostic factors are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical presentation, diagnostics, treatment, monitoring and clinical outcomes in a Norwegian cohort.

METHODS

Using discharge diagnoses between 2017 through 2020 from a large tertiary center, we identified 52 patients with CS. We performed a systematic chart review following a pre-specified checklist. The primary outcome of major cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as a composite of cardiovascular hospitalization, defibrillator therapy, cardiac transplantation, or death.

RESULTS

18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) showed pathological tracer uptake in 35/36 (97%) of immunosuppression-naïve patients. Immunosuppressive treatment was administered to 49/52 patients (94%) for a median of 43 (IQR 34) months; 69% were treated with second-line (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) and 25% with third-line (rituximab, infliximab) agents, respectively. Rituximab reduced inflammation as assessed by interval FDG-PET imaging and was overall well tolerated. Median duration to first MACE was 6 (IQR 10) months and 17/23 patients (74%) experienced a MACE within 12 months from CS diagnosis. No mortality was recorded and 20% achieved full remission. Age below the median of 53 years at time of diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of a MACE.

CONCLUSION

Long-term immunosuppression including a liberal use of non-steroidal agents, appeared essential in treating CS. Although the burden of cardiovascular events was substantial, the survival was excellent in this contemporary cohort. Prospective randomized studies are urgently needed to define the best therapy for these patients.

Risk of Adverse Outcomes Associated With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Diagnostic Schemes

BACKGROUND

Multiple cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) diagnostic schemes have been published.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the association of different CS diagnostic schemes with adverse outcomes. The diagnostic schemes evaluated were 1993, 2006, and 2017 Japanese criteria and the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria.

METHODS

Data were collected from the Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium, an international registry of CS patients. Outcome events were any of the following: all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device placement, heart transplantation, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of outcomes with each CS diagnostic scheme.

RESULTS

A total of 587 subjects met the following criteria: 1993 Japanese (n = 310, 52.8%), 2006 Japanese (n = 312, 53.2%), 2014 Heart Rhythm Society (n = 480, 81.8%), and 2017 Japanese (n = 112, 19.1%). Patients who met the 1993 criteria were more likely to experience an event than patients who did not (n = 109 of 310, 35.2% vs n = 59 of 277, 21.3%; OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.38-2.90; P < 0.001). Similarly, patients who met the 2006 criteria were more likely to have an event than patients who did not (n = 116 of 312, 37.2% vs n = 52 of 275, 18.9%; OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.74-3.71; P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant association between the occurrence of an event and whether a patient met the 2014 or the 2017 criteria (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.85-2.27; P = 0.18 or OR: 1.51; 95% CI: 0.97-2.33; P = 0.067, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

CS patients who met the 1993 and the 2006 criteria had higher odds of adverse clinical outcomes. Future research is needed to prospectively evaluate existing diagnostic schemes and develop new risk models for this complex disease.

A Case of Cardiac Sarcoidosis Masquerading As Heart Failure With Ventricular Arrhythmia

Sarcoidosis is a rare cause of cardiomyopathy that can easily be confused for acute heart failure when pulmonary manifestations are absent. We present the case of a 41-year-old female presenting with dyspnea found to have ventricular arrhythmia on arrival at the emergency department. Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography of the chest with contrast were performed, confirming the systemic sarcoidosis diagnosis with cardiac involvement.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis

About 5% of sarcoidosis patients develop clinically manifest cardiac features. Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) typically presents with conduction abnormalities, ventricular arrhythmias and heart failure. Its diagnosis is challenging and requires a substantial degree of clinical suspicion as well as expertise in advanced cardiac imaging. Adverse events, particularly malignant arrhythmias and development of heart failure, are common among CS patients. A timely diagnosis is paramount to ameliorating outcomes for these patients. Despite weak evidence, immunosuppression (primarily with corticosteroids) is generally recommended in the presence of active inflammation in the myocardium. The burden of malignant arrhythmias remains important regardless of treatment, thus leading to the recommended use of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in most patients with clinically manifest CS.

Assessment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: FDG PET and BMIPP SPECT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an inflammatory disease of unknown etiology that can lead to life-threatening arrhythmias, heart failure, and death. Advanced cardiac imaging modalities have improved the clinician's ability to detect this disease. The purpose of this review is to discuss the recent evidence of cardiac metabolic imaging as assessed by [¹⁸F]FDG PET and [¹²³I]BMIPP SPECT in the evaluation of CS patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

[¹⁸F]FDG PET is the gold standard to identify myocardial inflammation. [¹²³I]BMIPP SPECT can uncover early myocardial damage as well as advanced stages of CS when fibrosis prevails. In presence of inflammation, myocardial [¹⁸F]FDG uptake is increased, but in contrast, BMIPP myocardial uptake is reduced or even suppressed. Thus, a complementary role of cardiac metabolic imaging by [¹⁸F]FDG PET and BMIPP SPECT has been proposed to detect the whole spectrum of CS. [¹⁸F]FDG PET is considered an important tool to improve the diagnosis and optimize the management of CS. The role of [¹²³I]BMIPP SPECT in diagnosing CS is still under investigation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of combined cardiac metabolic imaging in the diagnosis, prognosis, and for selecting treatments in CS patients.