Efficacy and safety of a novel temperature-controlled catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation

BACKGROUND

Maintaining an adequate temperature at the target site is essential for effective ablation. We hypothesized that a tissue temperature-controlled (T-Con) catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation could improve the procedural ablation parameters.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the T-Con (DiamondTemp™) catheter for CTI ablation compared with non-irrigation (Non-Irri) and irrigation (Irri) catheters.

METHODS

We analyzed 150 patients who underwent prophylactic CTI ablation combined with pulmonary vein isolation. The Non-Irri, Irri, and T-Con catheter groups comprised 50 patients each, and the ablation procedural parameters and complications were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in clinical background characteristics among the three groups. The Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc tests demonstrated that the T-Con group showed the lowest total radiofrequency energy delivery time among the three groups (median [25 and 75 percentiles]: 340 [209, 357], 147 [100, 199], and 83 [61, 109] s, respectively in the Non-Irri, Irri, and T-Con groups; T-Con versus Non-Irri, p < .01; T-Con versus Irri, p < .01). The total procedural time and acute reconnection rate in the T-Con group (264 s and 4%, respectively) were lower than those in the Non-Irri group (438 s and 24%) but were similar to those in the Irri group (268 s and 6%). No significant complications were observed in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

The T-Con catheter achieved a short energy delivery time and a low acute reconnection rate, indicating its potential as an alternative catheter for CTI ablation.

Local impedance and contact force guidance to predict successful cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with a zero-fluoroscopy approach

Introduction

A new technology capable of monitoring local impedance (LI) and contact force (CF) has recently been developed. At the same time, there is growing concern regarding catheter ablation performed under fluoroscopy guidance, due to its harmful effects for both patients and practitioners. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of zero-fluoroscopy cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation monitoring LI drop and CF as well as to elucidate if these parameters can predict successful radiofrequency (RF) applications in CTI ablation.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study recruiting 50 consecutive patients who underwent CTI ablation. A zero-fluoroscopy approach guided by the combination of LI drop and CF was performed. In each RF application, CF and LI drop were monitored. A 6-month follow-up visit was scheduled to assess recurrences.

Results

A total of 767 first-pass RF applications were evaluated in 50 patients. First-pass effective RF applications were associated with greater LI drops: absolute LI drops (30.05 ± 6.23 Ω vs. 25.01 ± 5.95 Ω), p = 0.004) and relative LI drops (-23.3 ± 4.9% vs. -18.3 ± 5.6%, p = 0.0005). RF applications with a CF between 5 and 15 grams achieved a higher LI drop compared to those with a CF below 5 grams (29.4 ± 8.76 Ω vs. 24.8 ± 8.18 Ω, p < 0.0003). However, there were no significant differences in LI drop between RF applications with a CF between 5 and 15 grams and those with a CF beyond 15 grams (29.4 ± 8.76 Ω vs. 31.2 ± 9.81 Ω, p = 0.19). CF by itself, without considering LI drop, did not predict effective RF applications (12.3 ± 7.54 g vs. 11.18 ± 5.18 g, p = 0.545). Successful CTI ablation guided by a zero-fluoroscopy approach was achieved in all patients. Only one patient experienced a recurrence during the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

LI drop (absolute and relative values) appears to be a good predictor of successful RF applications to achieve CTI conduction block. The optimal CF to achieve a good LI drop is between 5 and 15 g. A zero-fluoroscopy approach guided by LI and CF was feasible, effective, and safe.

Contact Force-Guided versus Contact Force-Blinded Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus Ablation for Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact force (CF) is a novel approach developed to increase the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation. However, the value of CF-sensing technology for atrial flutter (AFL) cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) is inconclusive. To generate a comprehensive assessment of optimal extant data on CF for AFL, we synthesized randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies from Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane until 29 November 2022, using the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Two RCTs and three observational studies with a total of 376 patients were included in our analysis. CF-guided ablation was associated with (A) a higher rate of AFL recurrence (OR: 2.26 with 95% CI [1.05, 4.87]) and total CF (MD: 2.71 with 95% CI [1.28, 4.13]); (B) no effect on total procedure duration (MD: -2.88 with 95% CI [-7.48, 1.72]), fluoroscopy duration (MD: -0.96 with 95% CI [-2.24, 0.31]), and bidirectional isthmus block (BDIB) (OR: 1.50 with 95% CI [0.72, 3.11]); and (C) decreased radiofrequency (RF) duration (MD: -1.40 with 95% CI [-2.39, -0.41]). We conclude that although CF-guided CTIA was associated with increased AFL recurrence and total CF and reduced RF duration, it did not affect total procedure duration, fluoroscopy duration, or BDIB. Thus, CF-guided CTIA may not be the optimal intervention for AFL. These findings indicate the need for (A) providers to balance the benefits and risks of CF when utilizing precision medicine to develop treatment plans for individuals with AFL and (B) clinical trials investigating CF-guided catheter ablation for AFL to provide definitive evidence of optimal CF-sensing technology.

Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter guided by contact force related parameters: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Contact force (CF) and related parameters have been evaluated as an effective guide mark for pulmonary vein isolation, yet not for linear ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent atrial flutter (AFL). We thus studied the efficacy and safety of CF related parameter-guided ablation for CTI-AFL.

Methods

Systematic search was performed on databases involving PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science (through June 2022). Original articles comparing CF related parameter-guided ablation and conventional parameter-guided ablation for CTI-AFL were included. One-by-one elimination, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used for heterogeneity test between studies.

Results

Ten studies reporting on 761 patients were identified after screening with inclusion and exclusion criteria. Radiofrequency (RF) duration was significantly shorter in CF related parameter-guided group (p = 0.01), while procedural time (p = 0.13) and fluoroscopy time (p = 0.07) were no significant difference between two groups. CF related parameter-guided group had less RF lesions (p = 0.0003) and greater CF of catheter-tissue (p = 0.0002). Touch-up needed after first ablation line was less in CF related parameter-guided group (p = 0.004). In addition, there were no statistical significance between two groups on acute conduction recovery rates (p = 0.25), recurrence rates (p = 0.92), and complication rates (p = 0.80). Meta-regression analysis revealed no specific covariate as an influencing factor for above results (p > 0.10).

Conclusion

CF related parameters guidance improves the efficiency of CTI ablation, with the better catheter-tissue contact, the lower RF duration and the comparable safety as compared with conventional method, but does not improve the acute success rate and long-term outcome.

Optimized radiofrequency lesions through local impedance guidance for effective CTI ablation in right atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Although radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is an established treatment for typical right atrial flutter (RAFL), it remains to be established whether local tissue impedance (LI) is able to predict effective CTI ablation and what LI drop values during ablation should be used to judge a lesion as effective. We aimed to investigate the ability of LI to predict ablation efficacy in patients with RAFL.

METHODS

RF delivery was guided by the DirectSense™ algorithm. Successful single RF application was defined according to a defragmentation of atrial potentials (DAP), reduction of voltage (RedV) by at least 80% or changes on unipolar electrogram (UPC). The ablation endpoint was the creation of bidirectional conduction block (BDB) across the isthmus.

RESULTS

392 point-by-point RF applications were analyzed in 48 consecutive RAFL patients. The mean baseline LI was 105.4±12Ω prior to ablation and 92.0±11Ω after ablation (p<0.0001). According to validation criteria, absolute drops in impedance were larger at successful ablation sites than at ineffective ablation sites (DAP: 17.8±6Ω vs 8.7±4Ω; RedV: 17.2±6Ω vs 7.8±5Ω; UPC: 19.6±6Ω vs 10.1±5Ω, all p<0.0001). LI drop values significantly increased according to the number of criteria satisfied (ranging from 7.5Ω to 19.9). BDB was obtained in all cases. No procedure-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

A LI-guided approach to CTI ablation was safe and effective in treating RAFL. The magnitude of LI drop was associated with effective lesion formation and BDB and could be used as a marker of ablation efficacy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Catheter Ablation of Arrhythmias with a High-Density Mapping System in Real-World Practice (CHARISMA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT03793998. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Impact of Contact Force-Sensing Catheters on Fluoroscopy Time in Interventional Electrophysiology: A European Survey

This multicenter European survey systematically evaluated the impact of using contact force-sensing catheters (CFSCs) on fluoroscopy and procedure time in interventional electrophysiology. Data from 25 participating centers were collected and analyzed, also considering important confounders. With the use of CFSCs, fluoroscopy time was reduced for right- and left-sided atrial ablations (median −6.4 to −9.6 min, p < 0.001 for both groups), whereas no such effect could be found for ventricular ablations. Moreover, the use of CFSCs was associated with an increase in procedure time for right-sided atrial and ventricular ablations (median +26.0 and +44.0 min, respectively, p < 0.001 for both groups), but not for left-sided atrial ablations. These findings were confirmed independent of career level and operator volume, except for very highly experienced electrophysiologists, in whom the effect was blunted. In the subset of pulmonary vein isolations (PVIs), CFSCs were shown to reduce both fluoroscopy and procedure time. In conclusion, the use of CFSCs was associated with a reduced fluoroscopy time for atrial ablations and an increased procedure time for right atrial and ventricular ablations. These effects were virtually independent of the operator experience and caseload. When considering only PVIs as an important subset, CFSCs were shown to reduce both fluoroscopy and procedure time.

Ablation of typical atrial flutter using mini electrode measurements for maximum voltage-guided ablation: A randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Novel ablation catheters with mini electrode (ME) sensing have become available but their utility is unclear. We investigated whether ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) for atrial flutter (AFL) would be improved using ME signals.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients (76% male, 63 ± 10 years) with CTI-dependent AFL underwent ablation using a maximum voltage-guided approach, randomized to either standard 8 mm non-irrigated catheter with bipolar signals or IntellaTip MiFi catheter using ME signals alone.

RESULTS

Acute bidirectional block was achieved in 97%. Mean follow-up was 16.7 ± 10 months. The median number of ablation lesions was 13 in both groups (range 3-62 vs. 1-43, p = .85). No significant differences were observed in AFL recurrences (17% vs. 11%, p = .7), median procedure durations (97 min [interquartile range (IQR), 71-121] vs. 87 min [IQR, 72-107], p = .55) or fluoroscopy times (31 min [IQR, 21-52] vs. 38 min [IQR, 25-70], p = .56). Amplitudes of ME signals were on average 160% greater than blinded bipolar signals. In 23.7% of lesions where bipolar signals were difficult to interpret, 13.6% showed a clear ME signal.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the effectiveness of CTI ablation guided by ME signals, compared with using bipolar signals from a standard 8 mm ablation catheter. While ME signal amplitudes were larger and sometimes present when the bipolar signal was unclear, this did not improve procedural characteristics or outcomes. The results suggest future research should focus on lesion integrity rather than signal sensing.

Recurrent atrial arrhythmia in a randomised controlled trial comparing contact force-guided and contact force-blinded ablation for typical atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Contact force (CF)-guided catheter ablation (CA) is a novel technology developed to improve efficacy and reduce complications. In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), we previously documented that after 3 months, rate of persistent conduction block was similar with and without using CF while performing CA for typical atrial flutter (AFL). Clinical effect of CF on recurrent arrhythmia is unknown. Our objective is to study recurrent atrial arrhythmia during 12-month follow-up in a RCT investigating whether CF-guided CA for typical AFL is superior to CF-blinded CA.

METHODS

Patients were randomised 1:1 to CA guided by CF (intervention group) or blinded to CF (control group). After 12 months, patients attended clinical check-up preceded by a 5-day ambulatory Holter monitor recording. Primary outcome was any recurrent atrial arrhythmia ≥ 30 s within 12 months and documented in 12-lead ECG or Holter monitor recording.

RESULTS

We included 156 patients, four patients withdrew consent and two died during follow-up. Thus, 150 patients were included in final analysis. Recurrent arrhythmia was detected in 36 of 77 (47%) patients in the intervention group, and 32 of 73 patients (44%) in the control group (p = 0.51). Atrial fibrillation was detected in 23 (30%) and 29 (40%) patients in the intervention and control groups respectively. AFL was detected in 11 (14%) and 5 (7%) patients in the intervention and control groups respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Contact force-guided ablation for typical atrial flutter does not reduce recurrent atrial arrhythmia after 12-month follow-up as compared with ablation blinded for contact force.

Safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by the ablation index: acute results of the FLAI study

AIMS

Ablation index (AI) is a marker of lesion quality during catheter ablation that incorporates contact force, time, and power in a weighted formula. This index was originally developed for pulmonary vein isolation as well as other left atrial procedures. The aim of our study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the AI for the ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter (AFL).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This prospective multicentre non-randomized study enrolled 412 consecutive patients with typical AFL undergoing AI-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. The procedure was performed targeting an AI of 500 and an inter-lesion distance measurement of ≤6 mm. The primary endpoints were CTI 'first-pass' block and persistent block after a 20-min waiting time. Secondary endpoints included procedural and radiofrequency duration and fluoroscopic time. A total of 412 consecutive patients were enrolled in 31 centres (mean age 64.9 ± 9.8; 72.1% males and 27.7% with structural heart disease). The CTI bidirectional 'first-pass' block was reached in 355 patients (88.3%), whereas CTI block at the end of the waiting time was achieved in 405 patients (98.3%). Mean procedural, radiofrequency, and fluoroscopic time were 56.5 ± 28.1, 7.8 ± 4.8, and 1.9 ± 4.8 min, respectively. There were no major procedural complications. There was no significant inter-operator variability in the ability to achieve any of the primary endpoints.

CONCLUSION

AI-guided ablation with an inter-lesion distance ≤6 mm represents an effective, safe, and highly reproducible strategy to achieve bidirectional block in the treatment of typical AFL.