1
|
Ueyama HA, Miyamoto Y, Hashimoto K, Watanabe A, Kolte D, Latib A, Kuno T, Tsugawa Y. Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Leadless vs Transvenous Pacemakers Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 17:1779-1791. [PMID: 39023453 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence is limited regarding the effectiveness of leadless pacemaker implantation for conduction disturbance following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). OBJECTIVES This study sought to examine the national trends in the use of leadless pacemaker implantation following TAVR and compare its performance with transvenous pacemakers. METHODS Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who underwent leadless or transvenous pacemakers following TAVR between 2017 and 2020 were included. Outcomes included in-hospital overall complications as well as midterm (up to 2 years) all-cause death, heart failure hospitalization, infective endocarditis, and device-related complications. Propensity score overlap weighting analysis was used. RESULTS A total of 10,338 patients (730 leadless vs 9,608 transvenous) were included. Between 2017 and 2020, there was a 3.5-fold increase in the proportion of leadless pacemakers implanted following TAVR. Leadless pacemaker recipients had more comorbidities, including atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients with leadless pacemakers experienced a lower rate of in-hospital overall complications compared with patients who received transvenous pacemakers (7.2% vs 10.1%; P = 0.014). In the midterm, we found no significant differences in all-cause death (adjusted HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.96-1.32; P = 0.15), heart failure hospitalization (subdistribution HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.74-1.08; P = 0.24), or infective endocarditis (subdistribution HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.44-2.17; P = 0.95) between the 2 groups, but leadless pacemakers were associated with a lower risk of device-related complications (subdistribution HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.21-0.64; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Leadless pacemakers are increasingly being used for conduction disturbance following TAVR and were associated with a lower rate of in-hospital complications and midterm device-related complications compared to transvenous pacemakers without a difference in midterm mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki A Ueyama
- Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yoshihisa Miyamoto
- Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Hashimoto
- Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsuyuki Watanabe
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Mount Sinai Morningside and West, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dhaval Kolte
- Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Azeem Latib
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Toshiki Kuno
- Division of Cardiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; Division of Cardiology, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Yusuke Tsugawa
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California-Los Angeles Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palmisano P, Parlavecchio A, Guido A, Accogli M, Coluccia G. Upgrade from leadless to transvenous pacemaker with left bundle branch area pacing: A case report. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 47:1057-1060. [PMID: 38264957 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
An 80-years-old patient with permanent atrial fibrillation and symptomatic, paroxysmal atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) underwent leadless pacemaker (L-PM) implantation. Seven years after implantation, as a consequence of a progression of the AVB towards a persistent form, resulting in an increased need for pacing, he developed a pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. He then underwent a successful upgrade from L-PM to a transvenous pacemaker (T-PM) with left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). The L-PM did not interfere with the T-PM and was turned off and abandoned. One month after the upgrading the patient showed a significant improvement in cardiac function and functional capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase, Italy
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hofer D, Perucchini F, Blessberger H, Steinwender C, Zehetleitner S, Molitor N, Saguner AM, El-Chami MF, Black G, Schiavone M, Forleo G, Gasperetti A, Steffel J, Noti F, Haeberlin A, Breitenstein A. Electrocardiographic predictors of atrial mechanical sensing in leadless pacemakers. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:1072-1080. [PMID: 38432424 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leadless pacemakers (LPs) capable of VDD pacing allow for atrioventricular synchrony through mechanical sensing of atrial contraction. However, mechanical sensing is less reliable and less predictable than electrical sensing. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate P-wave amplitude during sinus rhythm from preoperative 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) as a predictor for atrial mechanical sensing in patients undergoing VDD LP implantation. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing VDD LP implantation were included in this 2-center prospective cohort study. ECG parameters were evaluated separately and in combination for association with the signal amplitude of atrial mechanical contraction (A4). RESULTS Eighty patients (median age 82 years; female 55%; mean body mass index [BMI] 25.8 kg/m2) were included in the study and 61 patients in the A4 signal analysis (19 patients in VVI mode during follow-up). Absolute (aVL, aVF, V1, V2) and BMI-adjusted (I, II, aVL, aVF, aVR, V1, V2) P-wave amplitudes from baseline ECGs demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation with A4 signal amplitude (all P <.05). A combined P-wave signal amplitude of at least 0.2 mV in V1 and aVL was predictive, with specificity of 83% (95% confidence interval 67%-100%) for A4 signal ≥1 m/s2. We found a significant correlation of A4 signal amplitude and overall atrioventricular synchrony (P = .013). CONCLUSION P-wave amplitudes in ECG leads aVL and V1 can predict A4 signal amplitude in patients with VDD LP and therefore the probability of successful AV synchronous pacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Hofer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Fabrizio Perucchini
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hermann Blessberger
- Department of Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Clemens Steinwender
- Department of Cardiology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Samantha Zehetleitner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nadine Molitor
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ardan M Saguner
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mikhael F El-Chami
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - George Black
- Division of Cardiology, Section of Electrophysiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Marco Schiavone
- Department of Clinical Electrophysiology & Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Forleo
- Cardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Jan Steffel
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Noti
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Haeberlin
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Breitenstein
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Khan MZ, Nassar S, Nguyen A, Khan MU, Sattar Y, Alruwaili W, Gonuguntla K, Mazek H, Asad ZUA, Agarwal S, Raina S, Balla S, Nguyen B, Fan D, Darden D, Munir MB. Contemporary trends of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2024; 35:1351-1359. [PMID: 38695242 DOI: 10.1111/jce.16295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Leadless pacemakers (LPM) have established themselves as the important therapeutic modality in management of selected patients with symptomatic bradycardia. To determine real-world utilization and in-hospital outcomes of LPM implantation since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016. METHODS For this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016-2020. The outcomes analyzed in our study included implantation trends of LPM over study years, mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention, any vascular complication, or acute kidney injury), length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. Implantation trends of LPM were assessed using linear regression. Using years 2016-2017 as a reference, adjusted outcomes of mortality, major complications, prolonged length of stay (defined as >6 days), and increased hospitalization cost (defined as median cost >34 098$) were analyzed for subsequent years using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS There was a gradual increased trend of LPM implantation over our study years (3230 devices in years 2016-2017 to 11 815 devices in year 2020, p for trend <.01). The adjusted mortality improved significantly after LPM implantation in subsequent years compared to the reference years 2016-2017 (aOR for the year 2018: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.73; aOR for the year 2019: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.41-0.59; and aOR for the year 2020: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.62). No differences in adjusted rates of major complications were demonstrated over the subsequent years. The adjusted cost of hospitalization was higher for the years 2019 (aOR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.22-1.46) and 2020 (aOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.55-1.84). CONCLUSION The contemporary US practice has shown significantly increased implantation rates of LPM since its approval with reduced rates of inpatient mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Z Khan
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Sameh Nassar
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Amanda Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | | | - Yasar Sattar
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Waleed Alruwaili
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Karthik Gonuguntla
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Haitham Mazek
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | | | - Siddharth Agarwal
- Division of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Sameer Raina
- Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sudarshan Balla
- Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Bao Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Dali Fan
- Department of Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Douglas Darden
- Division of Cardiology, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas, USA
| | - Muhammad Bilal Munir
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palmisano P, Dell'Era G, Guerra F, Ammendola E, Ziacchi M, Laffi M, Donateo P, Guido A, Ghiglieno C, Parlavecchio A, Dello Russo A, Nigro G, Biffi M, Gaggioli G, Senes J, Patti G, Accogli M, Coluccia G. Complications of left bundle branch area pacing compared with biventricular pacing in candidates for resynchronization therapy: Results of a propensity score-matched analysis from a multicenter registry. Heart Rhythm 2024; 21:874-880. [PMID: 38428448 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure, and left bundle branch block. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been shown to be a feasible and effective alternative to BVP. Comparative data on the risk of complications between LBBAP and BVP among patients undergoing CRT are lacking. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the long-term risk of procedure-related complications between LBBAP and BVP in a cohort of patients undergoing CRT. METHODS This prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolled 668 consecutive patients (mean age 71.2 ± 10.0 years; 52.2% male; 59.4% with New York Heart Association class III-IV heart failure symptoms) with left ventricular ejection fraction 33.4% ± 4.3% who underwent BVP (n = 561) or LBBAP (n = 107) for a class I or II indication for CRT. Propensity score matching for baseline characteristics yielded 93 matched pairs. The rate and nature of intraprocedural and long-term post-procedural complications occurring during follow-up were prospectively collected and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 18 months, procedure-related complications were observed in 16 patients: 12 in BVP (12.9%) and 4 in LBBAP (4.3%) (P = .036). Compared with patients who underwent LBBAP, those who underwent BVP showed a lower complication-free survival (P = .032). In multivariate analysis, BVP resulted an independent predictive factor associated with a higher risk of complications (hazard ratio 3.234; P = .042). Complications related to the coronary sinus lead were most frequently observed in patients who underwent BVP (50.0% of all complications). CONCLUSION LBBAP was associated with a lower long-term risk of device-related complications compared with BVP in patients with an indication for CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriele Dell'Era
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Federico Guerra
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi," Ancona, Italy
| | - Ernesto Ammendola
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Istituto di Cardiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mattia Laffi
- Divisione Cardiologia, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova ASL 3, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Donateo
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, ASL 4 Chiavarese, Lavagna, Italy
| | | | - Chiara Ghiglieno
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Tricase, Italy; Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonio Dello Russo
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi," Ancona, Italy
| | - Gerardo Nigro
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Istituto di Cardiologia, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Germano Gaggioli
- Divisione Cardiologia, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova ASL 3, Genova, Italy
| | - Jacopo Senes
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, ASL 4 Chiavarese, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Patti
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Parlavecchio A, Vetta G, Coluccia G, Pistelli L, Caminiti R, Crea P, Ajello M, Magnocavallo M, Dattilo G, Foti R, Carerj S, Chierchia GB, de Asmundis C, Della Rocca DG, Palmisano P. Success and complication rates of conduction system pacing: a meta-analytical observational comparison of left bundle branch area pacing and His bundle pacing. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2024; 67:719-729. [PMID: 37642801 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01626-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) and His bundle pacing (HBP) are the main strategies to achieve conduction system pacing (CSP), but only observational studies with few patients have compared the two pacing strategies, sometimes with unclear results given the different definitions of the feasibility and safety outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis aiming to compare the success and complications of LBBAP versus HBP. METHODS We systematically searched the electronic databases for studies published from inception to March 22, 2023, and focusing on LBBAP versus HBP. The study endpoints were CSP success rate, device-related complications, CSP lead-related complications and non-CSP lead-related complications. RESULTS Fifteen observational studies enrolling 2491 patients met the inclusion criteria. LBBAP led to a significant increase in procedural success [91.1% vs 80.9%; RR: 1.15 (95% CI: 1.08-1.22); p < 0.00001] with a significantly lower complication rate [1.8% vs 5.2%; RR: 0.48 (95% CI: 0.29-0.78); p = 0.003], lead-related complications [1.1% vs 4.3%; RR: 0.38 (95% CI: 0.21-0.72); p = 0.003] and lead failure/deactivation [0.2% vs 3.9%; RR: 0.16 (95% CI: 0.07-0.35); p < 0.00001] than HBP. No significant differences were found between CSP lead dislodgement and non-CSP lead-related complications. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis of observational studies showed a higher success rate of LBBAP compared to HBP with a lower incidence of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy.
| | - Giampaolo Vetta
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Giovanni Coluccia
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Via S. Pio X, 73039, Tricase, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Pistelli
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Caminiti
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Pasquale Crea
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Manuela Ajello
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Michele Magnocavallo
- Arrhythmology Unit, Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Via Ponte Quattro Capi 39, 00186, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Dattilo
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | | | - Scipione Carerj
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98124, Messina, Italy
| | - Gian Battista Chierchia
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Carlo de Asmundis
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Postgraduate Program in Cardiac Electrophysiology and Pacing, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, European Reference Networks Guard-Heart, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pietro Palmisano
- Cardiology Unit, "Card. G. Panico" Hospital, Via S. Pio X, 73039, Tricase, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu F, Meng L, Lin H, Xu W, Guo H, Peng F. Systematic review of leadless pacemaker. Acta Cardiol 2024; 79:284-294. [PMID: 37961771 DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2023.2276537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Conventional pacing systems consist of a pacemaker and one or more leads threaded from the device pocket through veins into the heart conducting the pacing therapy to the desired pacing site. Although these devices are effective, approximately one in eight patients treated with these traditional pacing systems experiences a complication attributed to the pacemaker pocket or leads. With the technological advances in electronics, leadless pacemakers that small enough to implant within the heart were introduced. Leadless pacemakers have been developed to overcome many of the challenges of transvenous pacing including complications related to leads or pacemaker pockets. This review aims to provide an overview of advantages of leadless pacemaker, complications and limitations of leadless pacemaker, leadless pacemaker candidate, and future directions of this promising technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fukang Xu
- Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, China
| | - Liping Meng
- Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, China
| | - Hui Lin
- Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, China
| | - Weiyuan Xu
- Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, China
| | - Hangyuan Guo
- Shaoxing Wen li Medical College, Shaoxing, China
| | - Fang Peng
- Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, Shaoxing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Habboush S, Elmoursi A, Gadelmawla AF, Masoud AT, Khalil M, Sheashaa H, Merza N, Massoud AT. Transvenous Compared With Leadless Pacemakers: A meta-analysis comparing TP versus LP. Cardiol Rev 2024:00045415-990000000-00202. [PMID: 38299806 DOI: 10.1097/crd.0000000000000660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of leadless pacemakers (LPs) and transvenous pacemakers and to examine the safety of both methods. We included patients undergoing single-chamber pacemaker implantation, either LP or TVP. Our outcomes were successful implantation rate, major complication, vascular injury, tamponade, and pneumothorax. We performed a double-arm analysis comparing LP versus TVP, with risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval. A total of 10 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Regarding efficacy endpoints, RR revealed no significant difference between the LP and transvenous pacemaker groups in terms of successful rate of implantation (RR = 1.00; P = 0.77). Regarding safety outcomes, LP experienced lower incidence of major complications (RR = 0.47; P = 0.01), infection (RR = 0.24; P = 0.001), and tamponade (RR = 0.36; P = 0.01). There was no significant difference between both groups regarding pneumothorax (RR = 0.35; P = 0.22) and vascular injury (RR = 1.55; P = 0.25). The study findings suggest that both LPs and TVPs have similar effectiveness. Moreover, the incidences of pneumothorax, vascular injuries, and major complications were found to be comparable between the 2 methods. However, LPs were found to have lower rates of infection and tamponade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shady Habboush
- From the Department of cardiology, Marien Hospital Witten, Witten, Germany
| | - Ahmed Elmoursi
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ahmed F Gadelmawla
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Amr T Masoud
- Department of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Khalil
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Hesham Sheashaa
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
| | - Nooraldin Merza
- Internal Medicine Department, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
| | - Ahmed T Massoud
- Department of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang Y, Huang H, Sun J, Shi J, Liu X, Feng L. Tissue-induced winding of permanent pacemaker passive-fixation leads. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:8799-8802. [PMID: 38106301 PMCID: PMC10722079 DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Hongman Huang
- Department of Cardiology, Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhua Sun
- Department of Cardiology, Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Shi
- Department of Cardiology, Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Xinbing Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Liuliu Feng
- Department of Cardiology, Shidong Hospital, Yangpu District, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Palmisano P, Ziacchi M, Dell'Era G, Donateo P, Ammendola E, Aspromonte V, Pellegrino PL, Del Giorno G, Coluccia G, Bartoli L, Patti G, Senes J, Parlavecchio A, Di Fraia F, Brunetti ND, Carbone A, Nigro G, Biffi M, Accogli M. Ablate and pace: Comparison of outcomes between conduction system pacing and biventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2023; 46:1258-1268. [PMID: 37665040 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP), including His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), have been proposed as alternatives to biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients scheduled for ablate and pace (A&P) strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes, including the rate and nature of device-related complications, between BVP and CSP in a cohort of patients undergoing A&P. METHODS Prospective, multicenter, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients undergoing A&P. The risk of device-related complications and of heart failure (HF) hospitalization was prospectively assessed. RESULTS A total of 373 patients (75.3 ± 8.7 years, 53.9% male, 68.9% with NYHA class ≥III) were enrolled: 263 with BVP, 68 with HBP, and 42 with LBBAP. Baseline characteristics of the three groups were similar. Compared to BVP and HBP, LBBAP was associated with the shortest mean procedural and fluoroscopy times and with the lowest acute capture thresholds (all p < .05). At 12-month follow-up LBBAP maintained the lowest capture thresholds and showed the longest estimated residual battery longevity (all p < .05). At 12-months follow-up the three study groups showed a similar risk of device-related complications (5.7%, 4.4%, and 2.4% for BVP, HBP, and LBBAP, respectively; p = .650), and of HF hospitalization (2.7%, 1.5%, and 2.4% for BVP, HBP, and LBBAP, respectively; p = .850). CONCLUSIONS In the setting of A&P, CSP is a feasible pacing modality, with a midterm safety profile comparable to BVP. LBBAP offers the advantage of reducing procedural times and obtaining lower and stable capture thresholds, with a positive impact on the device longevity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriele Dell'Era
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Paolo Donateo
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Ernesto Ammendola
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Pier Lugi Pellegrino
- Department of Cardiology, Policlinico Riuniti, University Hospital, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | - Lorenzo Bartoli
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Patti
- Division of Cardiology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Jacopo Senes
- Department of Cardiology, Arrhythmology Center, Lavagna, Italy
| | - Antonio Parlavecchio
- Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Fraia
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Natale Daniele Brunetti
- Department of Cardiology, Policlinico Riuniti, University Hospital, Foggia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Angelo Carbone
- Cardiology Unit, "Maria Ss Addolorata" Hospital, Eboli, Italy
| | - Gerardo Nigro
- Department of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gangannapalle M, Monday O, Rawat A, Nwoko UA, Mandal AK, Babur M, Khan TJ, Palleti SK. Comparison of Safety of Leadless Pacemakers and Transvenous Pacemakers: A Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e45086. [PMID: 37842352 PMCID: PMC10568652 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Pacemakers have been accessible for six decades, and clearly defined criteria for pacemaker implantation have been established. Within the contemporary clinical practice, two dependable pacing platforms exist leadless pacemakers and transvenous pacemakers. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety of leadless pacemakers to transvenous pacemakers. This meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 framework. A comprehensive and systematic search was conducted across various databases including Scopus, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, spanning from inception to August 15, 2023. The primary outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis were total complications, all-cause mortality, and device-related complications. Furthermore, secondary outcomes evaluated encompassed the need for reintervention, occurrences of pneumothorax, pericardial effusion, endocarditis, hemothorax, and hematoma. Total 17 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The findings of this study showed that patients with leadless pacemakers had a lower risk of total complications, device-related complications, pneumothorax, and endocarditis. The risk of reintervention was significantly lower in the leadless pacemaker group. However, compared to a transvenous pacemaker, the risk of pericardial effusion was significantly higher in the leadless pacemaker group. It is important to acknowledge the limitations arising from the lack of extensive long-term follow-up data for leadless pacemakers. As technology evolves, continued research will be essential in uncovering the full spectrum of prolonged complications associated with these devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Obinna Monday
- Medicine, Norfolk and Norwich University, Norwich, GBR
| | - Anurag Rawat
- Interventional Cardiology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, IND
| | - Ugonna A Nwoko
- Medicine, American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Cupicoy, SXM
| | | | - Maham Babur
- Internal Medicine, Women Medical and Dental College, Abbottabad, PAK
| | - Tayyaba J Khan
- Medicine, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, PAK
| | - Sujith K Palleti
- Nephrology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Defaye P, Biffi M, El-Chami M, Boveda S, Glikson M, Piccini J, Vitolo M. Cardiac pacing and lead devices management: 25 years of research at EP Europace journal. Europace 2023; 25:euad202. [PMID: 37421338 PMCID: PMC10450798 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Cardiac pacing represents a key element in the field of electrophysiology and the treatment of conduction diseases. Since the first issue published in 1999, EP Europace has significantly contributed to the development and dissemination of the research in this area. METHODS In the last 25 years, there has been a continuous improvement of technologies and a great expansion of clinical indications making the field of cardiac pacing a fertile ground for research still today. Pacemaker technology has rapidly evolved, from the first external devices with limited longevity, passing through conventional transvenous pacemakers to leadless devices. Constant innovations in pacemaker size, longevity, pacing mode, algorithms, and remote monitoring highlight that the fascinating and exciting journey of cardiac pacing is not over yet. CONCLUSION The aim of the present review is to provide the current 'state of the art' on cardiac pacing highlighting the most important contributions from the Journal in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Defaye
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital and Grenoble Alpes University, CS 10217, Grenoble Cedex 9, Grenoble 38043, France
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Cardiology Unit, Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Mikhael El-Chami
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Serge Boveda
- Clinique Pasteur, Heart Rhythm Department, Toulouse, France
| | - Michael Glikson
- Cardiology Department, Jesselson Integrated Heart Center Shaare Zedek Medical Center and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jonathan Piccini
- Duke University, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Marco Vitolo
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico Di Modena, Modena, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rate and nature of complications of conduction system pacing compared with right ventricular pacing: results of a propensity-matched analysis from a multicentre registry. Heart Rhythm 2023:S1547-5271(23)00226-6. [PMID: 36906165 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conduction system pacing (CSP) using His-bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as an alternative to right ventricular pacing (RVP). Comparative data on the risk of complications between CSP and RVP are lacking. OBJECTIVE Prospective, multicenter, observational study aimed to compare the long-term risk of device-related complications between CSP and RVP. METHODS A total of 1,029 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation with CSP (including HBP and LBBAP) or RVP were enrolled. Propensity matching for baseline characteristics yielded 201 matched pairs. Rate and nature of device-related complications occurring during follow-up were prospectively collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS During a mean follow-up of 18 months, device-related complications were observed in 19 patients: 7 in RVP (3.5%), and in 12 in CSP (6.0%) (p=0.240). Dividing the matched cohort in three groups with similar baseline characteristics according to the pacing modality (RVP, n=201; HBP, n=128; LBBAP, n=73), HBP patients showed a rate of device-related complications significantly higher compared to RVP patients (8.6 vs. 3.5%; p=0.047), and to LBBAP patients (8.6 vs. 1.3%; p=0.034). LBBAP patients showed a rate of device-related complications similar to that of RVP patients (1.3 vs. 3.5%, p=0.358). Most of the complications observed in HBP patients (63.6%) were lead-related. CONCLUSIONS Globally, CSP was associated with a risk of complications similar to that of RVP. Considering separately HBP and LBBAP, HBP showed a significantly higher risk of complications than both RVP and LBBAP, whereas LBBAP showed a risk of complications similar to RVP.
Collapse
|