Is electrocardiography a reliable tool for identifying patients with isthmus-dependent atrial flutter?

Electrocardiographic Approach to Atrial Flutter: Classifications and Differential Diagnosis

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a macro-reentrant arrhythmia characterized, in a 12 lead ECG, by the continuous oscillation of the isoelectric line in at least one lead. In the typical form of AFL, the oscillation is most obvious in the inferior leads, due to a macro-reentrant circuit localized in the right atrium, with the cavo-tricuspid isthmus as a critical zone.: This circuit can be activated in a counterclockwise or clockwise direction generating in II, III, and aVF leads, respectively, a slow descending/fast ascending F wave pattern (common form of typical AFL) or a balanced ascending/descending waveform (uncommon form of typical AFL). Atypical AFLs (scar-related) do not include the CTI in the circuit and show an extremely variable circuit location and ECG morphology.

Pathophysiology of Atypical Atrial Flutters

Atypical atrial flutters are complex supraventricular arrhythmias that share different pathophysiological aspects in common. In most cases, the arrhythmogenic substrate is essentially embodied by slow-conducting areas eliciting re-entrant circuits. Although atrial scarring seems to promote slow conduction, these arrhythmias may occur even in the absence of structural heart disease. To set out the ablation strategy in this setting, three-dimensional mapping systems have proved invaluable over the last decades, helping the cardiac electrophysiologist understand the electrophysiological complexity of these circuits and easily identify critical areas amenable to effective catheter ablation.

Is prophylactic ablation of the cavotricuspid and peri-incisional isthmus justified in patients with postoperative atrial flutter after right atriotomy?

BACKGROUND

The two most common postoperative atrial flutter (AFL) circuits after right atriotomy are the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) dependent and the lateral, peri-incisional. We investigated whether radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of both circuits results in more favorable long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent RFA of AFL after open-heart surgery. The effect of surgery type and RFA strategy on AFL recurrence was evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-two patients (mean age 64.5 ± 12.7 years, 65.% male) were enrolled. Patients with right atrial (RA) flutter (n=124) were divided into two groups based on the index RFA procedure: only one RA circuit was ablated (Group 1, n= 84, 67.7%) or both the CTI and the peri-incisional circuit ablated (Group 2, n= 40, 32.3%). The previous open-heart surgery was categorized based on the extension of the RA incision: limited (Type A) or extended (Type B) atriotomy. After a mean follow-up of 36±28 months, flutter recurrence was not different among patients with limited RA atriotomy (25% vs. 22% in Group 1A and 2A, respectively, p=1.0). However, after type B surgery, ablation of both AFL circuits was associated with a reduced recurrence rate (63% vs. 26% in Group 1B and 2B, respectively, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with postoperative RA flutter after extended right atriotomy, ablation of both the CTI and the peri-incisional isthmus significantly reduces the AFL recurrence rate. Prophylactic ablation of both isthmi, even if not proven to support reentry, is reasonable in this population. Keywords This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Surgical radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter: which operation should we choose?

The treatment of atrial flutter (AFL) in patients without structural heart disease (SHD) by transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) and bilateral pulmonary veins has achieved good results. We report three cases of typical AFL treated by surgical radiofrequency ablation. One patient, without SHD, successfully underwent CTI ablation and cardioversion. The other two patients, with SHD, underwent CTI ablation, partial right atrial ablation and pulmonary vein isolation, but a normal sinus rhythm was not achieved. Therefore, standard maze IV surgery may be the best choice in patients with AFL and SHD.

Toward a novel semi-invasive activation mapping tool for the diagnosis of supraventricular arrhythmias from the esophagus

AIMS

Supraventricular arrhythmia diagnosis using the surface electrocardiogram (sECG) is often cumbersome due to limited atrial signal quality. In some instances, use of esophageal electrocardiography (eECG) may facilitate the diagnosis. Here, we present a novel approach to reconstruct cardiac activation maps from eECG recordings.

METHODS

eECGs and sECGs were recorded from 19 individuals using standard acquisition tools. From the recordings, algorithms were developed to estimate the esophageal ECG catheter's position and to reconstruct high-resolution mappings of the cardiac electric activity projected in the esophagus over time.

RESULTS

Esophageal two-dimensional activation maps were created for five healthy individuals and 14 patients suffering from different arrhythmias. The maps are displayed as time-dependent contour plots, which not only show voltage over time as conventional ECGs, but also the location, direction, and projected propagation speed of the cardiac depolarization wavefront in the esophagus. Representative examples of sinus rhythm, atrial flutter, and ventricular pre-excitation are shown.

CONCLUSION

The methodology presented in this report provides a high-resolution view of the cardiac electric field in the esophagus. It is the first step toward a three-dimensional mapping system, which shall be able to reconstruct a three-dimensional view of the cardiac activation from recordings within the esophagus.

Noninvasive pacing study via pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for differentiating right from left atrial flutter

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial flutter who are implanted with a pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) present with the opportunity to perform a noninvasive pacing study (NIPS) using the right atrial pacing lead to differentiate right from left atrial flutter.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to study the feasibility and accuracy of NIPS to distinguish right from left atrial flutter.

METHODS

We enrolled consecutive patients scheduled for an electrophysiological study or ablation procedure who were in atrial flutter and who were implanted with a PM or ICD with a functional atrial lead in the right atrial appendage. Flutter tachycardia cycle lengths (TCLs) and postpacing intervals (PPIs) were measured noninvasively via the device during the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 48 (67%) patients were studied. Right atrial flutter was present in 32 patients (of whom 29 had typical cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter) and 16 (33%) patients had left atrial flutter. A PPI-TCL interval of >100 ms was 100% specific and 81% sensitive to identify left atrial flutter, with an overall accuracy of 94% and a c statistic of 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.00). A PPI-TCL interval of ≤100 ms had a positive predictive value of 86% for diagnosing typical flutter.

CONCLUSION

NIPS via PMs and ICDs with a PPI-TCL interval of >100 ms can reliably identify left atrial flutter (although we have only validated this cutoff for leads implanted in the right atrial appendage). This simple maneuver may allow planning for left-sided access and may avoid an unnecessary invasive electrophysiological study if left atrial flutter ablation is not to be considered.

Distribution of Mean Cycle Length in Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus Dependent Atrial Flutter

Although cycle length (CL) constitutes a fundamental descriptor of any arrhythmia, there is not larger study describing mean CL in electrophysiologically confirmed cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). We analyzed retrospectively digital recordings of 121 patients (98 men; age 64±11 years) referred for radiofrequency ablation of persistent CTI-dependent AFL. Median of mean AFL CL was 240 ms (interquartile range (IQR) of 222-258 ms, overall range of 178-399 ms). The distribution of CL was not normal (Shapiro Wilk test, p<0.001). Both counterclockwise and clockwise (14.9 % of all cases) AFLs were comparable in their CL; 240 (IQR 222-258) ms vs. 234 (217-253) ms, respectively. AFL CL<200 ms and AFL CL<190 ms was noticed in 5 (4.1 %) and 3 cases (2.5 %), respectively. In multivariate regression analysis, age (increase by 6±3 ms per decade of age, p=0.036), treatment with specific antiarrhythmic drugs (increase by 11±6 ms, p=0.052) and the history of cardiac surgery (increase by 26±9 ms, p=0.004) were independently associated with AFL CL. In conclusions, the distribution of AFL CL is not normal. The prevalence of AFL with short CL is low. Short CL<200 ms does not rule out the CTI-dependent AFL, especially in young and otherwise healthy patients.

Focal atrial tachycardia arising from the cavotricuspid isthmus with saw-tooth morphology on the surface ECG: electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available about focal atrial tachycardia (AT) arising from cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of a focal AT arising from the CTI.

METHODS

From a consecutive series of 92 patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for focal AT, three (4.4%) patients (three men) with a focal AT arising from the CTI were studied.

RESULTS

The median age was 71 years (range, 50 to 81 years). None of the patients had a history of CTI-dependent atrial flutter. The electrocardiogram (ECG) of a focal AT showed a significant negative F-wave in the inferior leads. Focal AT could be reproducibly initiated and terminated with programmed stimulation. The focus of the tachycardia was localized to the central isthmus in two and the paraseptal isthmus in one patient. The median tachycardia cycle length was 275 ms (range, 260 to 310 ms). In two patients, the focal AT was adenosine insensitive. In all of the patients, tachycardia was entrained from multiple right atrial sites, including the earliest activation site. RFCA was acutely successful in all patients. Long-term success was achieved in all patients over the median follow-up of 18 months (range, 6 to 33 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Cavotricuspid isthmus is an uncommon site of origin for focal AT. This focal AT has unique electrocardiographic characteristics such as saw-tooth morphology on ECG and is suggested to be caused by a focal reentrant circuit located at the CTI. Long-term success is achieved with focal ablation.