Esophageal injury, perforation, and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation are rare but serious complications following atrial fibrillation ablation. In this review article, we outline the incidence, pathophysiology, predictors, and preventative strategies of this dreaded complication.

METHODS

We conducted an electronic search in 10 databases/electronic search engines to access relevant publications. All articles reporting complications following atrial fibrillation ablation, including esophageal injury and fistula formation, were included for systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of 130 manuscripts were identified for the final review process. The overall incidence of esophageal injury following atrial fibrillation ablation was significantly higher with thermal ablation modalities (radiofrequency 5-40%, cryoballoon 3-25%, high-intensity focused ultrasound < 10%) as opposed to non-thermal ablation modalities (no cases reported to date). The incidence of esophageal perforation and fistula formation with the use of thermal ablation modalities is estimated to occur in less than 0.25% of all atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. The use of luminal esophageal temperature monitoring probe and mechanical esophageal deviation showed protective effect toward reducing the incidence of this complication. The prognosis is very poor for patients who develop atrioesophageal fistula, and the condition is rapidly fatal without surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal perforation and fistula formation following atrial fibrillation ablation are rare complications with poor prognosis. Various strategies have been proposed to protect the esophagus and reduce the incidence of this fearful complication. Pulsed field ablation is a promising new ablation technology that may be the future answer toward reducing the incidence of esophageal complications.

Prevention and treatment of pericardial tamponade in the electrophysiology laboratory: a European Heart Rhythm Association survey

AIMS

Pericardial tamponade (PT) is the most frequent severe complication during electrophysiology (EP) procedures and requires immediate, co-ordinated, and effective treatment. However, multiple aspects of PT treatment are either not standardized or are under ongoing debate.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An online questionnaire consisting of 26 multiple-choice questions was sent out to the European Heart Rhythm (EHRA) Research Network and also distributed via social media outputs. The EHRA survey was conducted between May and June 2023. A total of 213 replies were received from European (87%) and non-European countries. Ninety per cent of all participants perform interventions in dedicated EP labs equipped with different ablation platforms. In case of PT, most participants use X-ray as the main imaging modality guiding pericardial puncture, predominantly aiming for an anterior puncture site. Sheaths of different sizes are introduced into the pericardial space (84.3%), followed by a pigtail catheter. Application of protamine is an established but variable step in the majority (84.6%). Novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) antidotes are not used by 73.3% of participants, while 15.2% routinely apply them. Re-transfusion of aspirated blood is performed by 72.1% [before protamine administration (18.2%), after protamine administration (13.5%), if pericardial effusion cannot be controlled (40.4%)]. A total of 72.4% re-transfuse without blood filter systems. A decision for surgical intervention is mostly taken if bleeding continues despite all interventional measures.

CONCLUSION

The current survey demonstrates that the management of PT is heterogeneous among centres. The findings of this survey may help to guide operators in their treatment and decisions in the setting of PT.

Impact of intracardiac echocardiography usage on the safety of cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation: Subanalysis of the prospective FREEZE cluster cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) aiming at pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) became a standardized atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. Life-threatening complications like cardiac tamponade exist. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) usage is associated with superior safety in radiofrequency ablation. It is unclear if ICE has an impact on safety of CBA.

METHODS

The FREEZE Cohort (NCT01360008) subanalysis included patients undergoing "PVI only" CBA. Patients with intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography were excluded. Group A comprises conventional, group B ICE-guided CBA. Periprocedural results were compared.

RESULTS

From 2011 to 2016, a total of 4189 patients were enrolled, and 1906 (45.5%) were included in this subanalysis, split up in two groups (A: 1066 [55.9%], B: 840 [44.1%]). Group A was younger (60.6 ± 10.8 vs. 62.4 ± 10.5 years, p < .001), with smaller left atria (41 vs. 43 mm, p < .001), and less persistent AF (23.1 vs. 38.1%, p < .001). Procedure, left atrial, and fluoroscopy times were shorter in group A as compared to group B. Dose area product was significantly higher in group A (2911 vs. 2072 cGyxcm2 , p < .001). In-hospital major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac event rates including two deaths in group A were not different between groups (0.5% vs. 0.1%, p = .18). The rate of total procedural (10.4% vs. 5.1%, p < .001) and major complications (3.2% vs. 1.3%, p < .001) was significantly higher in group A. Cardiac tamponade occurred significantly more frequently in group A (8 [0.8%] vs. 1 [0.1%], p = .046). Independent predictors for major complications were female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, p = .03) and non-ICE usage (OR 2.38, p = .02). No differences were observed for persistent phrenic nerve palsy, nor for groin complications.

CONCLUSION

CBA was significantly safer and required less radiation if ICE was used, although the procedures were more complex. The risk of groin complications was not increased with ICE usage. Non-ICE usage was the only modifiable independent predictor of major complications.

Concomitant epicardial left atrial appendage ligation and left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation: Safety, feasibility and outcome

Introduction

We present initial results of patients undergoing a combined procedure of epicardial LAA ligation in addition to left atrial ablation for AF.

Methods

9 patients were included for additional use of LARIAT as an individual treatment approach for AF. First an epicardial LAA ligation was performed, in the same procedure left atrial ablations consisting of PVI and additional substrate based modifying ablations were performed. Follow–up at 3 months and 12 months was performed.

Results

There was only 1 minor procedural complication (11%) involving epicardial bleeding and 2 late adverse events of pericardial tamponade and stroke. At the final follow-up (median 20 months) 7 patients were in stable sinus rhythm (78%) and 2 pts had reduced AF burden.

Conclusion

Concomitant epicardial LAA ligation and ablation is feasible in selected patients with a reasonable risk profile. More prospective data are required to validate the safety and efficacy.

Electrophysiological findings in patients with isolated veins after cryoablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

AIMS

The main cause of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation is pulmonary vein reconnection. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyse the electophysiological findings in patients undergoing repeat procedures after an index cryoballoon ablation (CB-A) and presenting with permanency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in all veins. In addition, we sought to compare the latter with a similar group of patients with reconnected veins at the redo procedure.

METHODS

A total of 132 patients (81 men, 60.7 ± 12.4 years) who underwent CB-A for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) were enrolled. Indication for the redo procedure was symptomatic PAF in 83 (63%), persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) in 32 (24%) or persistent regular atrial tachycardia (RAT) in 17 (13%) patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (57%) patients presented a pulmonary vein reconnection (pulmonary vein group) during the redo procedure, whereas 57 (43%) had no pulmonary vein reconnection (non-pulmonary vein group). The non-pulmonary vein group exhibited significantly more non-pulmonary vein foci and atrial flutters than the pulmonary vein group after induction protocol (51 vs. 24%, P = 0.002 and 67 vs. 36%, P = 0.003, respectively). Twenty-two (29.3%) patients of the pulmonary vein group and 20 (35%) patients of the non-pulmonary vein group had atrial fibrillation/RAT recurrence after a mean follow-up of 12.5 ± 8 months. The survival analysis demonstrated no statistical significance in recurrence between both groups (log rank P = 0.358).

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation/RAT recurrence in patients after CB-A with durable PVI is significantly associated with non-pulmonary vein foci and atrial flutters. No statistically different success rate regarding atrial fibrillation/RAT freedom was detected between the pulmonary vein and non-pulmonary vein groups after redoing RF-CA.

Association of pericardial effusion after pulmonary vein isolation and outcomes in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The clinical implications of pericardial effusion (PE) after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are not well understood. We evaluated the association between newly developed PE after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal AF and arrhythmic recurrence.

METHODS

From a prospective AF ablation registry, 184 patients (mean age 59 ± 10 years, 65% male) who underwent first-time PV isolation using a smart touch surround flow catheter (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA) were analyzed. Postablation transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed within 1-3 days after ablation, and the occurrence of PE was assessed.

RESULTS

PE developed in 91 patients (49.5%), and most were of minimal severity (minimal, 93.4%; mild, 6.6%). Patients with PE had significantly lower body mass index and underwent cavotricuspid isthmus ablation more frequently. Early arrhythmic recurrence (EAR) (within 3 months) was observed in 28.8% of patients and was not different according to the PE development (PE [+]: 29.7% vs PE [-]: 28.0%; P = .80). During a median follow-up of 696 days, the cumulative rate of the late arrhythmic recurrence (LAR) (after 3 months) was 36.4%, and there was no difference between groups (PE [+]: 36.7% vs PE [-]: 35.1%; P = .988). The only predictor of LAR was EAR, and no echocardiographic parameters showed a significant correlation with LAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal or mild PE after PVI for paroxysmal AF is a frequent echocardiographic finding, and it had no significant association with AF recurrence. Routine TTE after AF ablation has no clinical implication.

Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation? Alternating technique for repeat procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Which technique is better for repeat ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to compare long-term efficacy of repeat ablation using the alternative technique for the first redo ablation procedure: (a) cryoballoon (CB) re-ablation after a failed index pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation, RF-then-CB group or (b) RF repeat ablation following a failed CB ablation, CB-then-RF group.

METHODS

Within the 1STOP Italian Project, consecutive patients undergoing repeat ablation with a different technique from the index procedure were included.

RESULTS

We studied 474 patients, 349 in RF-then-CB and 125 in CB-then-RF group. Less women (21% vs 30%; P = .041), more persistent AF (33% vs 22%; P = .015), longer duration of AF (60 vs 31 months; P < .001), and more hypertension (50% vs 36%; P = .007) were observed in the RF-then-CB cohort as compared with the CB-then-RF group. The number of reconnected PVs was 3.7 ± 0.7 and 1.4 + 1.3 in RF-then-CB and CB-then-RF group, respectively (P < .001). During the follow-up, significantly less AF recurrence occurred in the CB-then-RF group (22% vs 8%, HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.24-0.92; P = .025). Cohort designation was the only independent predictor of AF recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Alternation of energy source for repeat ablation was safe and effective, regardless the energy used first. However, patients initially treated with CB PVI undergoing repeat ablation with RF current had less AF recurrence at long-term follow-up as compared with those originally treated by RF ablation receiving a CB repeat ablation.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency as First Ablation Procedure for Atrial Fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Radiofrequency (RF) represents a standard of care for pulmonary vein isolation, whereas cryoballoon (CB) ablation has emerged as a valid alternative. The aim of our meta-analysis was to explore the efficacy and safety of CB compared with RF as first ablation procedure for AF. We searched the literature for studies that investigated this issue. The primary efficacy outcome was AF recurrence. The safety outcomes were: pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, phrenic nerve palsy, vascular complications, and major bleedings. Fourteen randomized controlled studies and 34 observational studies were included in the analysis. A total of 7,951 patients underwent CB ablation, whereas 9,641 received RF ablation. Mean follow-up was 14 ± 7 months. Overall, CB reduced the incidence of AF recurrence compared with RF ablation (relative risk [RR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 to 0.94; p = 0.001), and this result was consistent across different study design and AF type. CB had a significantly higher rate of phrenic nerve palsy, whereas it was related to a lower incidence of pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.88; p = 0.011) and vascular complications (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77; p <0.001) compared with RF. There was no significant difference in major bleedings between the 2 strategies. CB ablation had a shorter procedural time compared with RF (mean difference -20.76 minutes; p <0.001). In conclusion, considered its efficacy/safety profile and short procedural time, CB ablation represents the preferable option for first AF ablation procedure.

A comparative study of pericardial effusion and pleural effusion after cryoballoon ablation or radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

The incidence and clinical outcome of pericardial and pleural effusion after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been fully investigated.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients with paroxysmal AF were treated with either CBA (n = 30) or RFCA (n = 30) groups, with assessment of serum troponin I level, left atrial pulmonary vein computed tomography (CT) angiography and echocardiography within 24 hours before ablation, and serum troponin I level at 12 hours, and chest CT and echocardiography within 24 hours postablation. Repeat chest CT was performed 1 month after the index procedure in patients with pericardial or pleural effusion.

RESULTS

With similarly distributed baseline characteristics, the CBA group relative to the RFCA group had postablation: higher serum troponin I level (13.48 vs 1.84 µg/L, P < .001); similarly high pericardial effusion rates on chest CT (80% vs 93.3%, P > .05), with chest CT yielding significantly higher detection rate than echocardiography; similarly high pleural effusion rates on chest CT (73.3% vs 80%, P > .05); and smaller maximum depths on chest CT cross-section of pericardial effusion (5.21 ± 3.37 vs 7.13 ± 2.68 mm, P < .05) and pleural effusion bilaterally (left: 4.16 ± 4.90 vs 6.96 ± 5.42 mm; right: 5.04 ± 4.46 vs 7.55 ± 4.95 mm, both P < .05). The effusions self-resolved within a mean period of 1 month.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CBA and RFCA were associated with high rates of pericardial and pleural effusion, with RFCA yielding numerically higher incidence and significantly higher effusion extent, and chest CT significantly higher detection rates than echocardiography.

Acute Procedural Complications of Cryoballoon Ablation: A Comprehensive Review

Catheter ablation is increasingly performed for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Balloon based procedures have been developed aiming at safer, easier and more effective treatment as compared to point to point ablation. In the present review article, we aimed to discuss acute procedural complications of cryoballoon ablation.

Cryoballoon Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ablation therapy is the treatment of choice in antiarrhythmic drugrefractory atrial fibrillation (AF). It is performed by either cryoballoon ablation (CBA) or radiofrequency ablation. CBA is gaining popularity due to simplicity with similar efficacy and complication rate compared with RFA. In this meta-analysis, we compare the recurrence rate of AF and the complications from CBA versus RFA for the treatment of AF.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed for the articles that compared the outcome of interest. The primary outcome was to compare the recurrence rate of AF between CBA and RFA. We also included subgroup analysis with complications of pericardial effusion, phrenic nerve palsy and cerebral microemboli following ablation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies with 3527 patients met our predefined inclusion criteria. Recurrence of AF after CBA or RFA was similar in both groups (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.65, 1.07; I2=48%, Cochrane p=0.16). In subgroup analysis, heterogeneity was less in paroxysmal AF (I2=0%, Cochrane p=0.46) compared to mixed AF (I2=72%, Cochrane p=0.003). Procedure and fluoroscopy time was less by 26.37 and 5.94 minutes respectively in CBA compared to RFA. Complications, pericardial effusion, and silent cerebral microemboli, were not different between the two groups, however, phrenic nerve palsy was exclusively present only in CBA group.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that the effectiveness of CBA is similar to RFA in the treatment of AF with the added advantages of shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times.

A Case of Postablation Pericardial Effusion

Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation include pericardial effusion, which tends to occur acutely. Large and hemodynamically important effusions are uncommon, but a small effusion may be present at the end of the procedure in up to 22% of ablations. We monitor for pericardial effusions routinely after ablation with intracardiac echocardiography. However, the follow-up of a small effusion present immediately after ablation remains uncertain, especially with the use of dabigatran or another novel oral anticoagulant. There are no current recommendations on the follow-up of small pericardial effusions after ablation. We present a case and ask a panel of experts for their opinions.

The importance of extrapulmonary vein triggers and atypical atrial flutter in atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoablation: Insights from repeat ablation procedures

INTRODUCTION

It has not been previously investigated whether the recurrence mechanism after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is similar to that of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). We aimed to evaluate the differences of recurrence characteristics between RFCA and CBA after the index procedure.

METHODS

A total of 210 patients were enrolled in the study, and 69 patients underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using a 28-mm second-generation CBA. The control group comprising 140 patients underwent PV isolation using an open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter. A total of 69 patients in the CBA group and 69 patients in the RFCA group were investigated after propensity score matching. Recurrence patterns of AF were studied in the repeated procedure.

RESULTS

During the index procedure, there was no difference in PV or non-PV triggers between the two groups. Nineteen (27.5%) patients in the CBA group and 19 (27.5%) patients in the RFCA group had recurrence after a follow-up of 11.3 ± 7 months. The Kaplan-Meier curve did not reveal significant difference in recurrence (log-rank, P = 0.364) between the two groups. In the second procedure, the CBA group had more non-PV triggers (63.6%, P = 0.009) and left atrial (LA) flutters (54.5%, P = 0.027) compared with the RFCA group (12.5% and 12.5%, respectively). The PV reconnection rates were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in AF recurrence after catheter ablation between CBA and RFCA, but significant increases of non-PV triggers and LA flutter during the second procedure suggest the importance of the atrial substrate in maintaining AF during the second procedure after previous CBA.

Acute pericarditis following second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Acute pericarditis is a minor complication following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical aspects of pericarditis following cryoballoon (CB) ablation of AF investigating a possible association with procedural characteristics and a possible relationship with post-ablation recurrences.

METHODS

Four hundred fifty consecutive patients (male 73%, age 59.9 ± 11.2 years) with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF who underwent CB ablation as index procedure were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were any contraindication for the procedure including the presence of intracavitary thrombus and uncontrolled heart failure and contraindications to general anesthesia.

RESULTS

Acute pericarditis following CB ablation occurred in 18 patients (4%) of our study population. Pericardial effusion occurred in 14 patients (78%) and was mild/moderate. The total number of cryoapplications and the total freeze duration were significantly higher in patients with pericarditis compared with those without (respectively, p = 0.0006 and p = 0.01). Specifically, the number of applications and freeze duration in right inferior pulmonary vein were found significantly higher in patients with pericarditis (p = 0.007). The recurrence rate did not significantly differ between the two study groups (respectively, 16.7 vs 18.1%; p = 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of acute pericarditis following CB ablation in our study population accounted for 4% and was associated with both total freezing time and number of cryoapplications. The clinical course was favorable in all these patients and the occurrence of acute pericarditis did not affect the outcome during the follow-up period.

Cough as the sole manifestation of pericardial effusion

A 59-year-old woman with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) presented with severe non-productive cough, malaise, low-grade fever and AF flare-up 3 weeks following pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency catheter ablation. She denied chest pain or dyspnoea. Patient was haemodynamically stable. There was no pulsus paradoxus. Laboratories showed leucocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein. ECG showed sinus tachycardia. CT abdomen and pelvis showed a large pericardial effusion (PE). Shortly after admission, she developed AF with rapid ventricular response, responsive to intravenous amiodarone. Transthoracic echocardiogram revealed 2.4 cm posterior PE without tamponade physiology, non-amenable to pericardiocentesis via sub-xiphoid approach. Patient underwent left thoracoscopic pericardial window with removal of 250 cc bloody fibrinous fluid. Cough improved significantly and she was discharged on oral amiodarone and apixaban. Repeat CT chest after 2 weeks for recurrent cough showed a small PE, treated with oral prednisone for suspected postablation pericarditis, with complete resolution of cough. Amiodarone was stopped without recurrence of AF.

Complications of Atrial Fibrillation Cryoablation

Catheter ablation either by using radiofrequency or cryo energy in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has shown to be effective as compared to anti-arrhythmic drugs. However, all the techniques used during AF ablation are not free of complication. There are several well-known peri-procedural complications in which operators should be informed of the possible risks, cautious during the procedure and able to manage them when occurred. Herein, we aimed to review possible complications of AF cryoablation.

Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis

Introduction

Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) are the main treatments for drug-refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF).

Aim

To compare the efficacy and safety between CBA and RFCA for the treatment of AF.

Material and methods

We searched the Embase and Medline databases for clinical studies published up to December 2016. Studies that satisfied our predefined inclusion criteria were included.

Results

After searching through the literature in the two major databases, 20 studies with a total of 9,141 patients were included in our study. The CBA had a significantly shorter procedure time (weighted mean difference (WMD) –30.38 min; 95% CI: –46.43 to –14.33, p = 0.0002) and non-significantly shorter fluoroscopy time (WMD –3.18 min; 95% CI: –6.43 to 0.07, p = 0.06) compared with RFCA. There was no difference in freedom from AF between CBA and RFCA (CBA 78.55% vs. RFCA 83.13%, OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.95–1.39, p = 0.14). The CBA was associated with a high risk of procedure-related complications (CBA 9.02% vs. RFCA 6.56%, OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05–2.31, p = 0.03), especially phrenic nerve paralysis (PNP, OR = 10.72, 95% CI: 5.59–20.55, p < 0.00001). The risk of pericardial effusions/cardiac tamponade was low in the CBA group (CBA 1.05% vs. RFCA 1.86%, OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41–0.93, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

For AF, CBA was as effective as RFCA. However, CBA had a shorter procedure time and a non-significantly shorter fluoroscopy time, a significantly high risk of PNP and a low incidence of pericardial effusions/cardiac tamponade compared with RFCA.

Comparative efficacy and safety of contact force-sensing catheter and second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

This meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of the contact force (CF)-sensing catheter and second-generation cryoballoon (CB) ablation for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Six controlled clinical trials comparing ablation for AF using a CF-sensing catheter or second-generation CB were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. The procedure duration was significantly lower in the CB group compared with that in the CF group [mean difference (MD)=29.4; 95%CI=17.84–40.96; P=0.01], whereas there was no difference between the groups for fluoroscopy duration (MD=0.59; 95%CI=–4.48–5.66; P=0.82). Moreover, there was no difference in the incidence of non-lethal complications (embolic event, tamponade, femoral/subclavian hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis, phrenic nerve palsy, and esophageal injury) between the CB and the CF groups (8.38 vs 5.35%; RR=0.66; 95%CI=0.37–1.17; P=0.15). Transient phrenic nerve palsy occurred in 17 of 326 patients (5.2%) of the CB group vs none in the CF group (RR=0.12; 95%CI=0.03–0.43; P=0.001). A comparable proportion of patients in CF and CB groups suffered from AF recurrence during the 12-month follow-up after a single ablation procedure [risk ratio (RR)=1.03; 95%CI=0.78–1.35; P=0.84]. AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters and second-generation CB showed comparable fluoroscopy duration and efficacy (during a 12-month follow-up), with shorter procedure duration and different complications in the CB group.

Who Needs Catheter Ablation And Which Approach?

Catheter ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has gained a significant role during maintenance of sinus rhythm compared to anti-arrhythmic medication. Catheter ablation techniques are also improved and progressed over years in parallel to better understanding of disease mechanisms and technological advancements. However, due to invasive nature of the therapy with its pertinent procedural risks, both appropriate patient selection and use of relevant approach should be considered by all electrophysiologists before decide to perform catheter ablation.

Management of Tamponade Complicating Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Early Removal of Pericardial Drains Is Safe and Effective and Reduces Analgesic Requirements and Hospital Stay Compared to Conventional Delayed Removal

OBJECTIVES

This study reports on the safety of early removal of pericardial drains after cardiac tamponade complicating atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) procedures, the need for repeat pericardiocentesis, major adverse outcomes, as well as length of stay, and the need for opiate analgesia.

BACKGROUND

Tamponade from AFCA is traditionally managed by pericardiocentesis with delayed removal of the drain (typically 12 to 24 h later) in case of re-bleeding. A drain in situ often causes severe pain but ongoing blood loss is rare. Our institution adopted the practice of early removal of drains before leaving the laboratory if bleeding has stopped.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective descriptive analysis of 43 cases of tamponade complicating AFCA from 2006 to 2015, comparing patients in whom the drain was removed early (group early removal [ER]; n = 25) versus traditional delayed removal (group delayed removal [DR]; n = 18).

RESULTS

The groups were similar with respect to clinical/demographic characteristics, proportions of first-time versus re-do and pulmonary vein isolation versus pulmonary vein isolation + additional ablation. There were no deaths. No ER patients required drain re-insertion before discharge. The length of stay was shorter in the ER group (3 days; range 1 to 9 days) than in the DR group (4 days; range 2 to 60 days). The requirement for opiate analgesia was less in the ER group (8%) than in the DR group (72%).

CONCLUSIONS

Early removal of pericardial drains after tamponade complicating AFCA procedures appears to be safe and effective, with re-insertion not required in this cohort. The traditional practice of leaving drains in situ for 12 to 24 h may result in more patient discomfort and longer hospitalization.

Periprocedural Management of Novel Oral Anticoagulants During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Controversies and Review of the Current Evidence

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) has been the cornerstone for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at significant risk of stroke. Catheter ablation is an established efficacious technique for the treatment of AF. Ameliorating the risk of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in patients with AF undergoing ablation requires meticulous planning of pharmacotherapy. The advent of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has broadened the therapeutic scope, representing a viable alternative to traditional vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in non-valvular AF. Potential advantages of NOACs include greater pharmacokinetic predictability, at least comparable efficacy as compared to VKA and a superior haemorrhagic complication profile. However, robust evidence for the safety and efficacy of periprocedural NOAC use for AF ablation remains uncertain with a non-uniform clinical approach between and within institutions. The following review will summarise the current and emerging evidence on periprocedural management of NOACs in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. An overview of NOAC pharmacology will provide a foundation for the review of reversal agents in the context of catheter ablation of AF. The purpose of the review is to outline key studies and identify key areas for further critical research with the ultimate aim of developing evidence-based guidelines for optimal care.

Balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (cryoballoon and laserballoon)

Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins still remains one of the major objectives during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, balloon-based technologies hold great promise to simplify the approach to successful pulmonary vein isolation. While the cryoballoon represents the only true 'single-shot' technology, the laserballoon allows real-time endoscopic visualization of the pulmonary vein antrum during energy delivery. Either technology aims at complete electrical isolation, requiring continuous transmural lesion sets encircling the pulmonary veins. Strategies to confirm and to improve upon the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation are the key to acute and long-term clinical success and will be reviewed in this article.

Outcomes Of Cryoballoon Ablation Of Atrial Fibrillation: A Comprehensive Review

Over the last decade, cryoballoon ablation has emerged as an effective alternate strategy to point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. There are several reasons for this. First, the acute and long-term safety and efficacy associated with cryoablation appear comparable to that of radiofrequency ablation in patients with both paroxysmal and also persistent atrial fibrillation. Second, cryoablation offers certain advantages over conventional radiofrequency ablation including a gentler learning curve, shorter ablation and procedure times as well as lack of need for costly electroanatomical mapping technologies commonly utilized with radiofrequency ablation. Lastly, with the recent advent of the second-generation cryoballoon, the effectiveness of cryoablation has further improved dramatically. This comprehensive review examines the gradual evolution of the cryoablation tools as well as the rationale and data in support of the currently-available cryoballoon technologies for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Major complications of cryoballoon catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and their management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common symptomatic and sustained cardiac arrhythmia. It affects approximately 2-3 million people in the USA alone with an increased incidence and prevalence worldwide. It is associated, in addition to worsening quality of life, with increased morbidity and mortality especially in poorly controlled AF, affecting mostly those older than 65 years of age. Radiofrequency ablation was found to be a good strategy for focal isolation of pulmonary veins triggering from the vulnerable atrial substrate but is a time-consuming procedure and carries the risk of multiple complications like tamponade which could be fatal, atrioesophageal fistula and local thrombus formation at the site of ablation. Cryoballoon ablation with pulmonary vein isolation has emerged in the past few years as a breakthrough novel technology for the treatment of drug-refractory AF. It is a relatively simple alternative for point-by-point radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal AF and is associated with fewer incidences of fatal complications such as cardiac perforation. As experience with this new tool accumulates, the field faces new challenges in the form of rare compilations including gastroparesis, phrenic nerve palsy, atrioesophageal fistula, pulmonary vein stenosis, thromboembolism pericardial effusion, and tamponade.

Is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Currently radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablations are the two standard ablation systems used for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation; however, there is no universal consensus on which ablation is the optimal choice. We therefore sought to undertake a meta-analysis with special emphases on comparing the efficacy and safety between cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations by synthesizing published clinical trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Articles were identified by searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases before September 2013, by reviewing the bibliographies of eligible reports, and by consulting with experts in this field. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. There were respectively 469 and 635 patients referred for cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablations from 14 qualified clinical trials. Overall analyses indicated that cryoballoon ablation significantly reduced fluoroscopic time and total procedure time by a weighted mean of 14.13 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.82 to 25.45; P = 0.014) minutes and 29.65 (95% CI: 8.54 to 50.77; P = 0.006) minutes compared with radiofrequency ablation, respectively, whereas ablation time in cryoballoon ablation was nonsignificantly elongated by a weighted mean of 11.66 (95% CI: -10.71 to 34.04; P = 0.307) minutes. Patients referred for cryoballoon ablation had a high yet nonsignificant success rate of catheter ablation compared with cryoballoon ablation (odds ratio; 95% CI; P: 1.34; 0.53 to 3.36; 0.538), and cryoballoon ablation was also found to be associated with the relatively low risk of having recurrent atrial fibrillation (0.75; 0.3 to 1.88; 0.538) and major complications (0.46; 0.11 to 1.83; 0.269). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity and low probability of publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate greater improvement in fluoroscopic time and total procedure duration for atrial fibrillation patients referred for cryoballoon ablation than those for radiofrequency ablation.

Role of cardiac computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in guiding management and treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: state of the art review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In view of an aging population, the prevalence and incidence of AF are on the rise and are expected to double in the coming decades, posing a huge economic burden on already strained resources. New innovative therapies such as pulmonary vein isolation and percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage have emerged. The current applications of such therapies would not have been possible without the pivotal role of multimodality cardiovascular imaging. The role of echocardiography in guiding therapy has been extensively reviewed. However, there are new data in support of other complementary imaging modalities, mainly cardiac computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging, which will be the focus of this review.

The Future of Pulmonary Vein Isolation - Single-shot Devices, Remote Navigation or Improving Conventional Radiofrequency Delivery by Contact Monitoring and Lesion Characterisation?

Pulmonary vein isolation is the main goal of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation to date. Lack of isolation is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrences. Precise navigation to specific target sites, catheter stability and appropriate contact force are requisites for effective radiofrequency applications. Conventional manual-guided point-by-point radiofrequency energy delivery shows limitations to reach them, especially when performed by non-experienced electrophysiologists. New technological alternatives are rapidly arising and becoming clinically available to overcome some of the manual-guided radiofrequency delivery shortcomings. Here, we review the most recent clinical data, potential advantages, shortcomings and future directions of the new ablation strategies for pulmonary vein isolation.

Complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia requiring treatment that is encountered in clinical practice. Recent advances in the understanding of underlying mechanisms of AF have led to the increased use of catheter ablation (CA) as a treatment modality for paroxysmal, persistent, or long-standing persistent AF in patients with symptomatic AF despite treatment with antiarrhythmic medications. Because of the complexity in technique and anatomic location of the ablation sites, it is not surprising that CA of AF is associated with a greater risk of procedural complications compared with simpler cardiac ablation procedures. Major and minor complications, including life-threatening complications, have been described and quantified. This systematic review describes the potential risks of CA that have been reported over a period and provides insights into the evolving strategies to minimize these complications, thus making CA techniques safer and potentially more efficacious for AF.

Multiple cardiac perforations following radiofrequency catheter ablation: case report and literature reviews

INTRODUCTION

Multiple cardiac ruptures after radiofrequency catheter ablation that requires surgical repair are uncommon.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We describe a 64-year old male patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who had a cardiac tamponade following radiofrequency ablation. Surgical exploration demonstrated two ruptures in the left atrium, one in the right atrium, and one hematoma in the right atrium. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and related databases were searched up to June 2011 without language restrictions, and related literature was reviewed and discussed. The patient has survived from prompt cardiac repair of cardiac ruptures and recovered from surgery without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Urgent exploratory surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is the key to salvage the patient.

Acute pericardial effusion following atrial fibrillation ablation: characteristics and relationship with arrhythmia recurrences

BACKGROUND

Pericardial effusion (PE) can occur during or after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, and may induce atrial arrhythmia.

AIM

To characterize the impact of PE on arrhythmia recurrences following AF ablation.

METHODS

Patients referred for a first radiofrequency AF ablation were studied prospectively. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 24h after the procedure. If PE was present, transthoracic echocardiography was repeated at 1 month to evaluate PE evolution. Early arrhythmia recurrences (EARs) were defined as any arrhythmia documented within 1 month of the procedure.

RESULTS

PE was diagnosed in 18/81 patients (22%); and was present in significantly more patients with persistent versus paroxysmal AF (14/40 [35%] vs 4/41 [10%]; P=0.008). PEs were mild (mean 6 ± 3mm), mainly asymptomatic (89%), and none required pericardiocentesis. Early and late arrhythmia recurrences were present in 25/81 (31%) and 29/81 (36%), respectively. The incidence of PE was significantly higher among patients with EARs versus those without (12/25 [48%] vs 6/56 [11%]; P=0.0004). By multivariable analysis, PE and duration in AF were the two independent predictors of EARs. PE incidence was similar in patients with and without late arrhythmia recurrences. At 1 month, no patients had PE on transthoracic echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

PE following radiofrequency AF ablation is frequent, particularly following persistent AF ablation. This effusion is generally mild, mainly asymptomatic, and independently associated with EARs.

Cryoballoon catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation

Pulmonary vein isolation with catheter ablation is an effective treatment in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to antiarrhythmic medications. The cryoballoon catheter was recently approved for this procedure. In this paper, the basics of cryothermal energy ablation are reviewed including its ability of creating homogenous lesion formation, minimal destruction to surrounding vasculature, preserved tissue integrity, and lower risk of thrombus formation. Also summarized here are the publications describing the clinical experience with the cryoballoon catheter ablation in both paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation, its safety and efficacy, and discussions on the technical aspect of the cryoballoon ablation procedure.