Family history of atrial fibrillation as a predictor of atrial substrate and arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

The spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion ablation targeting rotors is more effective for elderly patients than non-elderly population

Background

Modulating atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers has been proposed as one of the effective ablation strategies for non-paroxysmal AF (non-PAF). However, the optimal non-PAF ablation strategy is still under debate because the exact mechanisms of AF persistence including focal activity and/or rotational activity, are not well-understood. Recently, spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion (STED) assumed to indicate rotors in the form of rotational activity is proposed as an effective target for non-PAF ablation. We aimed to clarify the effectiveness of STED ablation for modulating AF drivers.

Methods

STED ablation plus pulmonary vein isolation was applied in 161 consecutive non-PAF patients not undergoing previous ablation. STED areas within the entire left and right atria were identified and ablated during AF. After the procedures, the STED ablation's acute and long-term outcomes were investigated.

Results

(1) Despite a more effective acute outcome of the STED ablation for both AF termination and non-inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs), Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the 24-month freedom ratio from ATAs was 49%, which resulted from the higher recurrence ratio of atrial tachycardia (AT) rather than AF. (2) A multivariate analysis showed that the determinant of ATA recurrences was only a non-elderly age, not long-standing persistent AF, and an enlarged left atrium, which were conventionally considered as key factors.

Conclusions

STED ablation targeting rotors was effective in elderly non-PAF patients. Therefore, the main mechanism of AF persistency and the component of the fibrillatory conduction might vary between elders and non-elders. However, we should be careful about post-ablation ATs following substrate modification.

Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Late Recurrence in Young Patients with Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but the recurrence of AF is not neglected. Young patients with AF were generally more symptomatic and intolerant to long-term drug treatment. We aim to explore clinical outcomes and predictors of late recurrence (LR) in AF patients younger than 45 years after CA to better manage them.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 92 symptomatic AF patients who accepted CA from September 1, 2019, to August 31, 2021. Baseline clinical data (including N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide, NT-proBNP), ablation outcomes, and follow-up outcomes were collected. Patients were followed up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Follow-up data were available for 82/92 (89.1%) patients.

Results

One-year arrhythmia-free survival was 81.7% (67/82) in our study group. Major complications occurred in 3/82 (3.7%) patients with an acceptable rate. The value of ln(NT-proBNP) (P = 0.025, odds ratio [OR] = 1.977, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.087-3.596) and a family history of AF (P = 0.041, HR = 9.269, 95% CI 1.097-78.295) could independently predict AF recurrence. The ROC analysis of ln(NT-proBNP) showed that NT-proBNP greater than 200.05 pg/ml (area under the curve: 0.772, 95% CI 0.642-0.902, P = 0.001, sensitivity 0.800, specificity 0.701) was the cut-off point for predicting late recurrence.

Conclusions

CA is a safe and effective treatment for AF patients younger than 45 years. Elevated NT-proBNP level and a family history of AF could be used as predictors for late recurrence in young patients. The result of this study may help us take more comprehensive management of those with high-recurrence risks to reduce disease burden and improve quality of life.

Prognosis of Atrial Fibrillation with or without Comorbidities: Analysis of Younger Adults from a Nationwide Database

Objective: To assess the prognosis of AF patients with or without cardiac or extra-cardiac concomitant conditions. Participants and Methods: All consecutive patients diagnosed with AF admitted to French hospitals between 2011 and 2020 were identified. Patients were classified into four groups: (1) > 60 yo; (2) with known cardiac disease (KCD group); (3) with extra-cardiac comorbidities (ECC); and 4) AF without KCD or ECC (“Lone AF”). Results: Altogether 2,435,541 patients were identified, from which 2,203,702 patients aged >60 years and 231,839 patients aged <60 years (with KCD (55.2%), with ECC (14.7%) and with “Lone AF” (30.1%)). During follow-up, the incidences of all-cause and CV deaths were 13.7%, 5.7%, 6.2%, and 2.3%, and 4.2%, 1.7%, 0.8%, and 0.3% in the older than 60 yo group, KCD group, ECC group and “Lone AF” AF group, respectively. In the age and sex-adjusted analysis (patients < 60 yo), patients with AF and KCD had worse outcomes than patients with “Lone AF” for all major cardiac events. Conclusion: There are three distinct prognostic criteria based on the presence or lack of HD or extra-cardiac concomitant comorbidities. Patients in the so-called “Lone AF” group remain severe in terms of CV events but still with a lower incidence than the patients with associated KCD or ECC. The presence of KCD or ECC makes it possible to distinguish a profile in terms of events that are very different between the patients.

Atrial fibrillation: is there a role for cardiac troponin?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, and its prevalence rate is expected to be doubled over the next decades. Despite the wide use of biomarkers in the management of different cardiac diseases such as myocardial infarction and heart failure, utilization of biomarkers in AF management is not routinely recommended by current guidelines. There is also growing evidence that higher levels of cardiac-specific troponin, as an intracellular protein involved in cardiomyocyte contraction, may be associated with the risk of incident and recurrent AF and its complications. In the present paper, we review the association between troponin and AF and propose clinical suggestions for use of troponin in the management of AF patients.

Role of genetics in atrial fibrillation management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) management has significantly improved during the career of professor Crijns. Research was implemented into guidelines and clinical practice. However, despite advances in AF management, large differences between individual treatment responses still exist and the mechanisms underlying initiation and perpetuation of AF are not completely understood. International collaborations have revealed the genetic contribution to AF and steps towards improving AF management are being made. In this short review, the most important paradigms shifts in the field of AF genetics are recognized and the future role of genetics in personalized management of AF is discussed.

Effect of family history of atrial fibrillation on recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: A report from the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry Study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the impact of family history of atrial fibrillation (FAF) on postablation atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) recurrence.

METHODS

All the 8198 patients undergoing initial AF ablation registered in the Chinese Atrial Fibrillation Registry study were analyzed. FAF was defined as having first-degree relatives diagnosed as AF at age 65 years or younger, and before the time the case in this study was diagnosed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of FAF on postablation AT recurrence. Age, sex, body mass index, AF type, history of congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism, vascular diseases, use of contact force-sensing catheter, and completion of high school were adjusted. The definition of AT recurrence was any documented AF, atrial flutter, or AT lasting more than or equal to 30 s after 3 months blanking period.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 26.2 ± 19.6 months, 318 out of the 645 patients (49.3%) with FAF and 3339 out of the 7553 patients (44.2%) without FAF experienced AT recurrence, corresponding to annual recurrence rates of 22.8% and 20.2%, respectively. Patients with FAF had a significant higher risk of AT recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio 1.129, 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.267) in multivariable analysis. Moreover, FAF had a significant higher impact on AT recurrence in the subgroup of patients diagnosed with AF at age 50 years or younger (p for interaction = .036).

CONCLUSION

FAF is a risk factor for postablation AT recurrence. This is especially true in those with AF diagnosed at 50 years or younger.

Symptom burden and treatment perception in patients with atrial fibrillation, with and without a family history of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to aggregate within family and might be associated with a lower quality-of-life (QoL). We evaluated the association between a family history (FHx) of AF and patient-reported symptom burden and perception towards treatment. We performed a retrospective analysis in a cohort of 1285 newly diagnosed patients with AF. Patients completed the atrial fibrillation effect on quality of life (AFEQT) questionnaire at the time of registration and at the 1-year follow-up. Patients who had a first-degree relative with AF were classified into the FHx group. Baseline characteristics and AFEQT scores were compared between groups, and a multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the independent association between FHx and QoL. Overall, 15.9% of patients (n = 204) had a positive AF FHx. Compared to the non-FHx group, the FHx group had an earlier onset of AF (60.2 ± 12.0 years vs. 64.5 ± 12.1 years; P < 0.05) and lower AFEQT overall summary (AFEQT-OS) score at baseline (73.9 ± 17.8 vs. 77.0 ± 16.8; P < 0.05). After adjustment for clinical background, a positive FHx was independently associated with a worse QoL (changes in AFEQT-OS score = - 3.18; 95% confidence interval: - 5.67 to - 0.69; P = 0.012). No between-group difference in AFEQT-OS scores was noted at the 1-year follow-up. An FHx of AF was associated with a lower QoL, which could be improved by therapeutic intervention in patients with AF. Recognizing the presence of an FHx of AF is important to predict patient's symptom load and treatment acceptance.

Family History of Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the association between family history of atrial fibrillation (AF) with cardiovascular events (CVEs), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and cardiovascular mortality.

METHODS

Multicenter prospective observational cohort study including 1722 nonvalvular AF patients from February 2008 to August 2019 in Italy. Family history of AF was defined as the presence of AF in a first-degree relative: mother, father, sibling, or children. Primary outcome was a composite of CVEs including fatal/nonfatal ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. Second, we analyzed the association with major adverse cardiac event.

RESULTS

Mean age was 74.6±9.4 years; 44% of women. Family history of AF was detected in 368 (21.4%) patients, and 3.5% had ≥2 relatives affected by AF. Age of AF onset progressively decreased from patients without family history of AF, compared with those with single and multiple first-degree affected relatives (P<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 23.7 months (4606 patients/y) 145 CVEs (3.15%/y), 98 major adverse cardiac event (2.13%/y), and 57 cardiovascular deaths (0.97%/y) occurred. After adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, family history of AF was associated with a higher risk of CVEs (hazard ratio, 1.524 [95% CI, 1.021-2.274], P=0.039), major adverse cardiac event (hazard ratio, 1.917 [95% CI, 1.207-3.045], P=0.006), and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 2.008 [95% CI, 1.047-3.851], P=0.036). Subgroup analysis showed that this association was modified by age, sex, and prior ischemic heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of elderly patients with a high atherosclerotic burden, family history of AF is evident in >20% of patients and was associated with an increased risk for CVEs and mortality. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01882114.

Genetic Susceptibility for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

Ablation is a widely used therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, arrhythmia recurrence and repeat procedures are common. Studies examining surrogate markers of genetic susceptibility to AF, such as family history and individual AF susceptibility alleles, suggest these may be associated with recurrence outcomes. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to test the association between AF genetic susceptibility and recurrence after ablation using a comprehensive polygenic risk score for AF.

METHODS

Ten centers from the AF Genetics Consortium identified patients who had undergone de novo AF ablation. AF genetic susceptibility was measured using a previously described polygenic risk score (N=929 single-nucleotide polymorphisms) and tested for an association with clinical characteristics and time-to-recurrence with a 3 month blanking period. Recurrence was defined as >30 seconds of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia. Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex, height, body mass index, persistent AF, hypertension, coronary disease, left atrial size, left ventricular ejection fraction, and year of ablation.

RESULTS

Four thousand two hundred seventy-six patients were eligible for analysis of baseline characteristics and 3259 for recurrence outcomes. The overall arrhythmia recurrence rate between 3 and 12 months was 44% (1443/3259). Patients with higher AF genetic susceptibility were younger (P<0.001) and had fewer clinical risk factors for AF (P=0.001). Persistent AF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.22-1.58]; P<0.001), left atrial size (per cm: HR, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.19-1.46]; P<0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction (per 10%: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.80-0.97]; P=0.008) were associated with increased risk of recurrence. In univariate analysis, higher AF genetic susceptibility trended towards a higher risk of recurrence (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.99-1.18]; P=0.07), which became less significant in multivariable analysis (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.98-1.15]; P=0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher AF genetic susceptibility was associated with younger age and fewer clinical risk factors but not recurrence. Arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation may represent a genetically different phenotype compared to AF susceptibility.