1
|
Halin A, Hamelin JL, Defaye P, Deharo JC, Fauchier L, Marijon E, Piot O, Boveda S. Information provision and follow-up of French patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: The APODEC survey. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2023; 116:572-579. [PMID: 37953189 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators reduce mortality, but the electric shocks delivered can impact the patient's quality of life. Patient education is an efficient way to reduce the stress related to both the device and the disease. AIMS We assessed the evolution of knowledge and satisfaction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients regarding their cardiac disease, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, follow-up complications, remote monitoring and daily life recommendations. Quality of life, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related stress levels and remote monitoring benefits were also evaluated. METHODS A self-administered questionnaire of 43 items was published on the French Association of Cardiac Electrical Device Wearers (APODEC) website and sent to registered patients. RESULTS Overall, 330 patients completed the survey. Physicians were the patients' principal information source regarding their cardiac disease (86.7%) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (93.3%), and 90% looked for further information after the procedure, mainly on websites (78.8%). More than half of the patients were not sufficiently informed about implantable cardioverter-defibrillators before implantation (61.2%). In the patients' opinion, the best sources of further information were their physician (81.8%), patient associations (63.6%) and the Internet (45.8%). Although patient knowledge increased during follow-up, their knowledge could be improved regarding daily life with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (52.1%), remote monitoring (34.2%) and their cardiac disease (32.1%). Remote monitoring follow-up was used by 92.1% of patients and mostly improved their peace of mind (67.8%). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks were associated with major stress for patients receiving them (46.6%). CONCLUSION These findings highlight the lack of information provided to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients before implantation, a concerning issue to be addressed in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pascal Defaye
- Cardiology Department, Grenoble University Hospital, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - Jean-Claude Deharo
- Cardiology Department, La Timone Hospital, AP-HM, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Fauchier
- Cardiology Department, Trousseau University Hospital, 37170 Chambray-lès-Tours, France; Faculty of Medicine, François Rabelais University, 37000 Tours, France
| | - Eloi Marijon
- Cardiology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Olivier Piot
- Cardiology Department, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France
| | - Serge Boveda
- Cardiology-Heart Rhythm Management Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France; Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Portig I, Karaaslan E, Hofacker E, Volberg C, Seifart C. Patients' Perspective on Termination of Pacemaker Therapy-A Cross-Sectional Anonymous Survey among Patients Carrying a Pacemaker in Germany. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2896. [PMID: 37958040 PMCID: PMC10649284 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11212896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the opinions of patients regarding the withdrawal of pacemaker therapy. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS A cross-sectional anonymous questionnaire was administered to patients visiting an outpatient cardiologic clinic for routine follow-up visits of pacemaker therapy or patients carrying a pacemaker admitted to a hospital between 2021 and 2022. RESULTS Three-hundred and forty patients answered the questionnaire. A total of 56% of the participants were male. The mean age was 81 years. The majority of respondents were very comfortable with their PM and felt well informed, with one exception: more than half of respondents were missing information on withdrawal of pacemaker therapy. Almost two-thirds wanted to decide for themselves if their pacemaker therapy was withdrawn regardless of whether they were ill or healthy. Almost 60% of patients would like the pacemaker to be turned off when dying. Women expressed this wish significantly more often than men. CONCLUSION Our survey shows that patients prefer to be informed on issues regarding the withdrawal of pacemakers as early as preimplantation. Also, patients would like to be involved in decisions that have to be made at the end of life, including decisions on withdrawal. Offers of conversations about this important issue should include information on special features of the patient's pacemaker, e.g., the absence or presence of pacemaker dependency. Knowledge about the pacemaker's functionality may prevent distress among individuals nearing their end of life when, for example, under the false impression that timely deactivation may allow for a more peaceful death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Portig
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Elif Karaaslan
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Elena Hofacker
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Christian Volberg
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Carola Seifart
- Research Group Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Valovska T, Joyce M. Resuscitation in older surgical patients. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2023; 61:67-70. [PMID: 37589168 DOI: 10.1097/aia.0000000000000414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora Valovska
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hwang Y, Bae H. Patient Outcomes Associated with the First Remote Monitoring Experience of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in South Korea. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:1587-1595. [PMID: 37772031 PMCID: PMC10522456 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s422626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Remote monitoring of cardiac devices reduces unnecessary outpatient visits and increases patient satisfaction. We aimed to evaluate remote monitoring in terms of patient satisfaction, economic efficiency, and safety. Patients and Methods This was a single university hospital survey. The time/medical cost efficacy and satisfaction index were evaluated using a questionnaire to investigate patient satisfaction before and after remote monitoring in patients using Biotronik implantable cardiac devices. The questionnaire was adopted and modified from Hwang's 2020 Survey on Telehealth Patient Experience. Results Remote monitoring was associated with a decrease in total outpatient visits. Of 1270 remote monitoring-related alerts clinicians received during the study period, more than 95% were from patients with pacemakers. Still, the severity of alerts was higher for implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators. The post-RM survey results demonstrated that patients were generally satisfied with RM, perceived it as cost-effective, and found that RM facilitated health management without disrupting their daily routines. Conclusion The study participants were satisfied with their first remote monitoring experience and reported having time- and cost-savings by using remote monitoring. Remote monitoring-related alerts from high-voltage devices were more severe and required medical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- YouMi Hwang
- Department of Cardiology, St. Vincent’s Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea
- Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease (CRID), College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hannah Bae
- Department of Economics, University of California - San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Feijen M, Egorova AD, Kuijken T, Bootsma M, Schalij MJ, van Erven L. One-Year Mortality in Patients Undergoing an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pulse Generator Replacement: Identifying Patients at Risk. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5654. [PMID: 37685719 PMCID: PMC10489035 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) significantly contribute to the prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected patients. However, it is essential to identify those who are likely to not have benefit from an ICD and to defer a pulse generator exchange. Easily implementable guidelines for individual risk stratification and decision making are lacking. This study investigates the 1-year mortality of patients who underwent an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator function (CRT-D) pulse generator replacement in a contemporary real-world tertiary hospital setting. The cause of death and patient- and procedure-related factors are stratified, and predictive values for 1-year mortality are evaluated. Patients with a follow-up of ≥365 days (or prior mortality) after an ICD or CRT-D exchange at the Leiden University Medical Center from 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 were eligible. In total, 588 patients were included (77% male, 69 [60-76] years old, 59% primary prevention, 46% ischemic cardiomyopathy and 37% mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)). Patients undergoing a CRT-D replacement or upgrade had a significantly higher 1-year all-cause mortality (10.7% and 11.9%, respectively) compared to patients undergoing ICD (2.8%) exchange (p = 0.002). LVEF ≤ 30%, New York Heart Association class ≥ 3, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤ 30 mL/min/m2 and haemoglobin ≤ 7 mmol/L were independently associated with mortality within 1 year after pulse generator replacement. There is a growing need for prospectively validated risk scores to weight individualized risk of mortality with the expected ICD therapy benefit and to support a well-informed, shared decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anastasia D. Egorova
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden Heart-Lung Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (M.F.); (L.v.E.)
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mascheroni J, Stockburger M, Patwala A, Mont L, Rao A, Retzlaff H, Garweg C, Verbelen T, Gallagher AG. Effect of Metrics-Based Simulation Training to Proficiency on Procedure Quality and Errors Among Novice Cardiac Device Implanters: The IMPROF Randomized Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2322750. [PMID: 37651144 PMCID: PMC10472192 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance In cardiac device implant training, there is no common system to objectively assess trainees' ability to perform tasks at predetermined performance levels before in vivo practice; therefore, patients are potentially exposed to risks related to operators' early learning curve. Objective To assess the effect on implant performance quality of novel metrics-based simulation training to proficiency (proficiency-based progression [PBP]) vs traditional simulation-based training (SBT). Design, Setting, and Participants In this prospective randomized trial, conducted between March 8, 2022 and November 24, 2022, novice implanters were randomized (blinded) 1:1 to participate in an SBT curriculum (procedural knowledge e-learning and in-person simulation training) at an international skills training center, with proficiency demonstration requirements at each training stage for advancing (PBP approach) or without the requirements. Ultimately, trainees performed a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant using virtual reality simulation. The procedure was video-recorded and subsequently scored using previously validated metrics by 2 independent assessors blinded to group. Physicians who had already implanted more than 20 pacemakers or defibrillators and fewer than 200 CRT systems as the first operator were eligible. Thirty-two implanters from 10 countries voluntarily enrolled in the training program and were randomized; 30 (15 per group) started and completed training. Data analysis was performed from November 27 to December 22, 2022. Intervention Training with PBP vs SBT. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome comprised 4 objectively assessed performance metrics derived from the video-recordings: number of procedural steps completed, errors, critical errors, and all errors combined. Results Baseline experience of the 30 participants (19 [63%] male; mean [SD] number of years in implant practice, 2.0 [1.8]; median [IQR] number of implanted pacemakers or defibrillators, 47.5 [30.0-115.0]; median [IQR] number of implanted CRT systems, 3.0 [1.25-10.0]) was similar between study groups. Compared with the SBT group, the PBP group completed 27% more procedural steps (median [IQR], 31 [30-32] vs 24 [22-27]; P < .001) and made 73% fewer errors (median [IQR], 2 [1-3] vs 7 [5-8]; P < .001), 84% fewer critical errors (median [IQR], 1 [0-1] vs 3 [3-5]; P < .001), and 77% fewer all errors combined (errors plus critical errors) (median [IQR], 3 [1-3] vs 11 [8-12]; P < .001); 14 of the 15 PBP trainees (93%) demonstrated the predefined target performance level vs 0 of the 15 SBT trainees. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized trial, the PBP approach to novice implanter training generated superior objectively assessed performance vs SBT. If implemented broadly and systematically, PBP training may ensure safe and effective performance standards before trainees proceed to (supervised) in vivo practice. Future studies are needed to verify implications on procedure-related patient complications. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05952908.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorio Mascheroni
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiac Rhythm Management Training and Education, Medtronic International Trading Sàrl, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
| | - Martin Stockburger
- Department of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Havelland Kliniken, Nauen, Germany
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ashish Patwala
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Lluís Mont
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain
| | - Archana Rao
- Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Christophe Garweg
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Verbelen
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anthony G. Gallagher
- Orsi Academy, Melle, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sears SF, Khant K. Car park clinic: "Driving" clinic innovation in cardiac electrophysiology? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2023; 34:1348-1349. [PMID: 37210615 DOI: 10.1111/jce.15936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel F Sears
- Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kyaw Khant
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jespersen CHB, Krøll J, Bhardwaj P, Winkel BG, Jacobsen PK, Jøns C, Haarbo J, Kristensen J, Johansen JB, Philbert BT, Riahi S, Torp-Pedersen C, Køber L, Tfelt-Hansen J, Weeke PE. Severity of Brugada syndrome disease manifestation and risk of new-onset depression or anxiety: a Danish nationwide study. Europace 2023; 25:euad112. [PMID: 37129985 PMCID: PMC10228627 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Reduced psychological health is associated with adverse patient outcomes and higher mortality. We aimed to examine if a Brugada syndrome (BrS) diagnosis and symptomatic disease presentation were associated with an increased risk of new-onset depression or anxiety and all-cause mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS All Danish patients diagnosed with BrS (2006-2018) with no history of psychiatric disease and available for ≥6 months follow-up were identified using nationwide registries and followed for up to 5 years after diagnosis. The development of clinical depression or anxiety was evaluated using the prescription of medication and diagnosis codes. Factors associated with developing new-onset depression or anxiety were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Disease manifestation was categorized as symptomatic (aborted cardiac arrest, ventricular tachycardia, or syncope) or asymptomatic/unspecified at diagnosis. A total of 223 patients with BrS and no history of psychiatric disease were identified (72.6% male, median age at diagnosis 46 years, 45.3% symptomatic). Of these, 15.7% (35/223) developed new-onset depression or anxiety after BrS diagnosis (median follow-up 5.0 years). A greater proportion of symptomatic patients developed new-onset depression or anxiety compared with asymptomatic patients [21/101 (20.8%) and 14/122 (11.5%), respectively, P = 0.08]. Symptomatic disease presentation (HR 3.43, 1.46-8.05) and older age (lower vs. upper tertile: HR 4.41, 1.42-13.63) were significantly associated with new-onset depression or anxiety. All-cause mortality in this group of patients treated according to guidelines was low (n = 4, 1.8%); however, 3/4 developed depression or anxiety before death. CONCLUSION Approximately, one-sixth of patients with BrS developed new-onset depression or anxiety following a diagnosis of BrS. Symptomatic BrS disease manifestation was significantly associated with new-onset depression or anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla H B Jespersen
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Johanna Krøll
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Priya Bhardwaj
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bo Gregers Winkel
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Karl Jacobsen
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Jøns
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Haarbo
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Jens Kristensen
- Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Jens Brock Johansen
- Department fo Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, J B Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Berit T Philbert
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sam Riahi
- Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Christian Torp-Pedersen
- Department of Cardiology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Lars Køber
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederik V's Vej 11, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Peter E Weeke
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Januszkiewicz Ł, Barra S, Marijon E, Providencia R, de Asmundis C, Chun JKR, Farkowski MM, Conte G, Boveda S. Major gaps in the information provided to patients before implantation of cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective patient European evaluation. Europace 2023; 25:1144-1151. [PMID: 36691111 PMCID: PMC10062348 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Information provided to patients prior to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion and their participation in the decision-making process are crucial for understanding ICD function and accepting this lifelong therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the extent to which different aspects related to ICD and quality of life were transmitted to patients prior to ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS Prospective, multicenter European study with an online questionnaire initiated by the European Heart Rhythm Association. The questionnaire was filled-in directly and personally by the ICD patients who were invited to participate. A total of 1809 patients (majority in their 40s-70s, with 624 women, 34.5%) from 10 European countries participated in the study. The median time from first ICD implantation was 5 years (interquartile range 2-10). Overall, 1155 patients (71.5%) felt optimally informed at the time of device implantation, however many respondents received no information about ICD-related complications (n = 801, 49.6%), driving restrictions (n = 718, 44.5%), and possibility of end-of-life ICD deactivation (n = 408, 25.4%). Of note, women were less frequently involved in the decision-making process than men (47.3% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.003) and reported to be less often optimally informed before ICD implantation than men (61.2% vs. 76.8%, P < 0.001). More women mentioned the desire to have learned more about ICD therapy and the benefit/risk balance (45.4% vs. 33.7% of men; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This patient-based evaluation provides alarming findings on the lack of information provided to patients prior ICD implantation, particularly for women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sérgio Barra
- Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz Arrabida, V. N. Gaia, Portugal
| | - Eloi Marijon
- University of Paris, Paris, France.,Cardiology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France.,Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, 56 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Rui Providencia
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.,Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carlo de Asmundis
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julian K R Chun
- CCB, Cardiology, Med. Klinik III, Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michał M Farkowski
- 2nd Department of Heart Arrhythmia, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Giulio Conte
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Lugano, Switzerland.,Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France.,Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, 56 Rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.,Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saha N, Millward JM, Herrmann CJJ, Rahimi F, Han H, Lacour P, Blaschke F, Niendorf T. High-Fidelity 3D Stray Magnetic Field Mapping of Smartphones to Address Safety Considerations with Active Implantable Electronic Medical Devices. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23:1209. [PMID: 36772249 PMCID: PMC9919430 DOI: 10.3390/s23031209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Case reports indicate that magnets in smartphones could be a source of electromagnetic interference (EMI) for active implantable medical devices (AIMD), which could lead to device malfunction, compromising patient safety. Recognizing this challenge, we implemented a high-fidelity 3D magnetic field mapping (spatial resolution 1 mm) setup using a three-axis Hall probe and teslameter, controlled by a robot (COSI Measure). With this setup, we examined the stray magnetic field of an iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 12, and MagSafe charger to identify sources of magnetic fields for the accurate risk assessment of potential interferences with AIMDs. Our measurements revealed that the stray fields of the annular array of magnets, the wide-angle camera, and the speaker of the smartphones exceeded the 1 mT limit defined by ISO 14117:2019. Our data-driven safety recommendation is that an iPhone 13 Pro should be kept at least 25 mm away from an AIMD to protect it from unwanted EMI interactions. Our study addresses safety concerns due to potential device-device interactions between smartphones and AIMDs and will help to define data-driven safety guidelines. We encourage vendors of electronic consumer products (ECP) to provide information on the magnetic fields of their products and advocate for the inclusion of smartphones in the risk assessment of EMI with AIMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandita Saha
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), 13125 Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), A Joint Cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jason M. Millward
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), 13125 Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), A Joint Cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Carl J. J. Herrmann
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), 13125 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Physics, Humboldt University of Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Faezeh Rahimi
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), 13125 Berlin, Germany
- Chair of Medical Engineering, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
| | - Haopeng Han
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Philipp Lacour
- Department of Cardiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Blaschke
- Department of Cardiology, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Thoralf Niendorf
- Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), 13125 Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), A Joint Cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max-Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Callaghan EM, Diamandis-Nikoletatos E, van Leeuwen PP, Higgins JB, Somerville CE, Brown LJ, Schumacher TL. Communication regarding the deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A scoping review and narrative summary of current interventions. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:3431-3445. [PMID: 36055906 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Communication about deactivation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy at end-of-life (EoL) is a recognised issue within clinical practice. The aim of this scoping review was to explore and map the current literature in this field, with a focus on papers which implemented interventional studies. METHODS Systematic searches of six major databases were conducted. Citations were included by four researchers according to selection criteria. Key demographic data and prespecified themes in relation to communication of ICD deactivation at EoL were extracted. RESULTS The search found 6197 texts of which 63 were included: 39 quantitative, 14 qualitative and 10 mixed-methods. Surveys were predominantly used to gather data (n = 34), followed by interviews (n = 18) and retrospective reviews of patient records (n = 18). CONCLUSIONS Several key gaps in the literature warrant further research. These include who is responsible for initiating ICD deactivation discussions, how clinicians should initiate and conduct these discussions, when ICD deactivations should be occurring, and family perspectives. Adequately explored themes include patient and clinician knowledge and attitudes regarding ICD deactivation at EoL. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS Facilities treating patients with ICDs at EoL should consider ongoing quality improvement projects aimed at clinician education and protocol changes to improve communication surrounding EoL ICD deactivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M Callaghan
- School of Medicine and Public Health (Joint Medical Program), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2305, Australia; School of Rural Medicine (Joint Medical Program), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | - Elly Diamandis-Nikoletatos
- School of Medicine and Public Health (Joint Medical Program), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2305, Australia; School of Rural Medicine (Joint Medical Program), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | - Paul P van Leeuwen
- School of Medicine and Public Health (Joint Medical Program), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2305, Australia; School of Rural Medicine (Joint Medical Program), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | - Jack B Higgins
- School of Medicine and Public Health (Joint Medical Program), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2305, Australia; School of Rural Medicine (Joint Medical Program), University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
| | | | - Leanne J Brown
- Department of Rural Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia
| | - Tracy L Schumacher
- Department of Rural Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Forman J, Murtagh E, Cheung J, Chakrabarti S, Macleod S, MacEwing C, Owens S, Alley H, Bangma K, Villeneuve M, Lauck S. Development of a patient and clinician co-led education program to promote living well with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Insights from a pilot project. PEC Innov 2022; 1:100104. [PMID: 37213750 PMCID: PMC10194333 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Objective To evaluate a pilot education program designed to improve patients' experience of living well with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Methods Patient Partners with previously implanted ICD and clinicians collaboratively performed monthly education sessions for potential and recent ICD recipients. Curriculum development was informed by current evidence of ICD patients' unique educational needs; delivery format transitioned to a virtual platform following the onset of COVID-19. Participants' experience was evaluated using a tailored questionnaire to explore preliminary insights. Results 126 participants (median age: 62 years; women: 30%) attended 24 sessions. In-person participants (n = 62, 49.2%) reported sessions as helpful (n = 56, 94%) with regards to format and Patient Partner interactions. Virtual participants 64 (50.8%) completed an electronic survey (n = 27, 45%); reporting sufficient information for most topics with the exception of potential psychological effects of ICD implantation. Patient Partners as collaborative session leaders was perceived to be very helpful (n = 22, 82%) or somewhat helpful (n = 5, 18%). Conclusion This novel educational partnership met the learning needs of patients at the vulnerable time of new cardiac device implantation of both in-person and virtual formats. Innovation The inclusion of Patient Partners in co-led cardiac education informs novel approach to care that may improve patients' experiences of living well with complex technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Santabhanu Chakrabarti
- St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandra Lauck
- St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
- University of British Columbia School of Nursing, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Corbisiero R, Muller D. The Gallant™ system heart rhythm management device: making a connection. Future Cardiol 2022; 18:605-614. [PMID: 35748496 DOI: 10.2217/fca-2021-0117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Implantable cardiac defibrillators have revolutionized the way we prevent sudden cardiac death via arrhythmias. The addition of cardiac resynchronization pacing to defibrillators has broadened that treatment to include patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. As with all technology, new devices and platforms expand the capabilities and interface with patients across the world. This review discusses the evolution from the initial modalities and methods of communication of implantable devices up to the most recent advances in implantable defibrillators and their integration into patient lives and clinical practice. This review is focused on the integration of Bluetooth communication into modern healthcare with the Gallant™ family of devices, the first branded launch by Abbott Laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Muller
- Abbott Laboratories, 15900 Valley View Ct, Sylmar, CA 91342, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hwang YM, Kim JH. The first survey on patient needs for remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic device in South Korea. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29414. [PMID: 35687779 PMCID: PMC9276406 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Studies showed that remote device monitoring reduced unnecessary outpatient visits and increased patient satisfaction. As there was no local research on remote monitoring (RM) in Korea, there was a lack of evidence for policy or insurance standards due to the lack of domestic data despite high demand by domestic arrhythmia experts. To establish the basis for patient satisfaction, economic efficiency, and safety of wireless monitoring, a survey-based study was planned. METHODS This was a single-university hospital survey. The satisfaction index was evaluated using a questionnaire to investigate patient satisfaction in outpatient clinics, economic efficiency (measured as home-to-clinic time, waiting time, and actual clinic time), and demand for RM in patients with implantable cardiac devices. The questionnaire was adopted and modified from the Survey on Telehealth Patient Experience by Bas-Villalobos, 2006 (modified Korean version 2.0 by You Mi Hwang, 2020). RESULTS Surveys were answered by 171 patients. The mean age of these patients was 71.2 ± 12.4 years. Based on the survey, home to clinic time was usually less than one h, mean waiting time in the hospital until clinic time ranged 42.6 ± 24.5 minutes, and mean clinic time ranged 3.1 ± 1.7 minutes. Based on the survey, patients favored RM over hospital visits with cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up mainly because of long travel times from home to clinic. CONCLUSION Based on the survey results, there is a clear need for RM in patients who have cardiac implantable electronic devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You Mi Hwang
- Department of Cardiology, St.Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease (CRID), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji-Hoon Kim
- Department of Cardiology, St.Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease (CRID), College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Januszkiewicz Ł, Barra S, Providencia R, Conte G, de Asmundis C, Chun JKR, Farkowski MM, Guerra JM, Marijon E, Boveda S. Long-term quality of life and acceptance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace 2022; 24:860-867. [PMID: 35167672 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) may impact patients’ life significantly. The aim of this survey was to analyse the impact of the ICD on quality of life (QoL) metrics from the patient’s perspective. ‘Living with an ICD’ was a prospective, multicentre study with an online questionnaire submitted to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Research Network centres as well as patient associations from 10 European countries; it was filled-in directly and personally by the patients that were invited to participate, with a minimal interaction or influence from the healthcare professionals. Overall, the questionnaire was completed by 1809 patients (624 women, 34.5%). Patients in their 60s and 70s and from Western Europe were the most represented. The median time from first ICD implantation was 5 years (IQR 2–10). Device-related complications were reported by 505 patients (22.4%), including one or more inappropriate shocks (n = 209, 11.6%). Almost half the respondents reported improved QoL, with a more favourable impact for those receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D), and only a 10th experienced a significant decrease in QoL. The occurrence of complications remained a major predictor of deteriorated QoL (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4–3.0, P < 0.001). In conclusion, most patients have a globally positive view and acceptance of ICD therapy, reporting preserved to improved QoL after device implantation. Complications, namely inappropriate shocks, affect the expectation of living a normal life post-implant and are associated with a significant decrease in QoL. Our findings also highlight the importance of a detailed informed consent process and the involvement of the patient in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sérgio Barra
- Cardiology Department, Hospital da Luz Arrabida, V. N. Gaia, Portugal
| | - Rui Providencia
- Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Health Informatics Research, University College of London, London, UK
| | - Giulio Conte
- Cardiology Department, Fondazione CardiocentroTicino, Lugano, Switzerland
- Universita` della Svizzera Italiana Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Carlo de Asmundis
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julian K R Chun
- CCB, Cardiology, Med. Klinik III, Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
- 2nd Department of Heart Arrhythmia, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał M Farkowski
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, CIBERCV, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Eloi Marijon
- Cardiology Department, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
- Paris Cardiovascular Research Center, INSERM Unit 970, Paris, France
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France
| | - Serge Boveda
- Heart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van den Heuvel LM, Sarina T, Sweeting J, Yeates L, Bates K, Spinks C, O’Donnell C, Sears SF, McGeechan K, Semsarian C, Ingles J. A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Health-Related Quality of Life and Psychological Wellbeing after an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Patients with Genetic Heart Diseases. Heart Rhythm O2 2022; 3:143-151. [PMID: 35496461 PMCID: PMC9043389 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genetic heart diseases (GHDs) can be clinically heterogeneous and pose an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a lifesaving therapy. Impacts on prospective and long-term psychological and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) after ICD implant in patients with GHDs are unknown. Objectives Investigate the psychological functioning and HR-QoL over time in patients with GHDs who receive an ICD, and identify risk factors for poor psychological functioning and HR-QoL. Methods A longitudinal, prospective study design was used. Patients attending a specialized clinic, diagnosed with a GHD for which they received an ICD between May 2012 and January 2015, were eligible. Baseline surveys were completed prior to ICD implantation with 5-year follow-up after ICD implant. We measured psychological functioning (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, Florida Shock Anxiety Scale), HR-QoL (Short-Form 36v2), and device acceptance (Florida Patient Acceptance Scale). Results Forty patients were included (mean age 46.3 ± 14.2 years; 65.0% male). Mean psychological and HR-QoL measures were within normative ranges during follow-up. After 12 months, 33.3% and 19.4% of participants showed clinically elevated levels of anxiety and depression, respectively. Longitudinal mixed-effect analysis showed significant improvements from baseline to first follow-up for the overall cohort, with variability increasing after 36 months. Nontertiary education and female sex predicted worse mental HR-QoL and anxiety over time, while comorbidities predicted depression and worse physical HR-QoL. Conclusion While the majority of patients with a GHD adjust well to their ICD implant, a subset of patients experience poor psychological and HR-QoL outcomes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Lappegård KT, Moe F. Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience? Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 19:ijerph19010312. [PMID: 35010572 PMCID: PMC8751026 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators are increasingly monitored by systems transmitting information directly from the patient to the hospital. This may increase safety and patient satisfaction and also under certain circumstances represent an economic advantage. The review summarizes some of the recent research in the field of remote monitoring of cardiac devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Tore Lappegård
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
- Correspondence:
| | - Frode Moe
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Oliveira ES, Menezes TMDO, Gomes NP, Oliveira LMSD, Batista VM, Oliveira MCM, Chaves AN. Transitional care of nurses to older adults with artificial pacemaker. Rev Bras Enferm 2021; 75Suppl. 4:e20210192. [PMID: 34852043 DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to understand how the transitional care of nurses to olde adults with artificial pacemaker occurs. METHOD a qualitative research, carried out in a philanthropic hospital in the city of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Fourteen nurses working in surgical and cardiac inpatient units participated. Data were collected between August and November 2020, through semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using the methodological framework Discourse of the Collective Subject and discussed in the light of Afaf Meleis' theory of transitions. RESULTS nurses' incipient knowledge about transitional care was identified. It was observed that the nursing discharge report is a facilitating instrument for transitional care. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS the study pointed out that the transitional care of nurses to older adults with artificial pacemakers does not have a theoretical foundation, reporting as a priority the care with the pacemaker identification card and with the surgical wound.
Collapse
|
19
|
Lacour P, Dang PL, Heinzel FR, Parwani AS, Bähr F, Kucher A, Hohendanner F, Niendorf T, Rahimi F, Saha N, Han H, Rubarth K, Sherif M, Boldt LH, Pieske B, Blaschke F. Magnetic field-induced interactions between phones containing magnets and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: Flip it to be safe? Heart Rhythm 2021:S1547-5271(21)02334-1. [PMID: 34767986 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent case reports and small studies have reported activation of the magnet-sensitive switches in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) by the new iPhone 12 series, initiating asynchronous pacing in pacemakers and suspension of antitachycardia therapies in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this prospective single-center observational study was to quantify the risk of magnetic field interactions of the iPhone 12 with CIEDs. METHODS A representative model of each CIED series from all manufacturers was tested ex vivo. Incidence and minimum distance necessary for magnet mode triggering were analyzed in 164 CIED patients with either the front or the back of the phone facing the device. The magnetic field of the iPhone 12 was analyzed using a 3-axis Hall probe. RESULTS Ex vivo, magnetic interference occurred in 84.6% with the back compared to 46.2% with the front of the iPhone 12 facing the CIED. In vivo, activation of the magnet-sensitive switch occurred in 30 CIED patients (18.3%; 21 pacemaker, 9 ICD) when the iPhone 12 was placed in close proximity over the CIED pocket and the back of the phone was facing the skin. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis identified implantation depth (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.24) as an independent predictor of magnet-sensitive switch activation. CONCLUSION Magnetic field interactions occur only in close proximity and with precise alignment of the iPhone 12 and CIEDs. It is important to advise CIED patients to not put the iPhone 12 directly on the skin above the CIED. Further recommendations are not necessary.
Collapse
|
20
|
Mullens W, Auricchio A, Martens P, Witte K, Cowie MR, Delgado V, Dickstein K, Linde C, Vernooy K, Leyva F, Bauersachs J, Israel CW, Lund LH, Donal E, Boriani G, Jaarsma T, Berruezo A, Traykov V, Yousef Z, Kalarus Z, Nielsen JC, Steffel J, Vardas P, Coats A, Seferovic P, Edvardsen T, Heidbuchel H, Ruschitzka F, Leclercq C. Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care. Europace 2021; 23:1324-1342. [PMID: 34037728 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euaa411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilfried Mullens
- Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Angelo Auricchio
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Pieter Martens
- Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium
- University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Klaus Witte
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin R Cowie
- Imperial College London (Royal Brompton Hospital), London, UK
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cecilia Linde
- Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kevin Vernooy
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johann Bauersachs
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Carsten W Israel
- Department of Medicine - Cardiology, Diabetology and Nephrology, Bethel-Clinic, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Lars H Lund
- Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erwan Donal
- Cardiologie, CHU Rennes - LTSI Inserm UMR 1099, Université Rennes-1, Rennes, France
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Tiny Jaarsma
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Vassil Traykov
- Department of Cardiology, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Zaheer Yousef
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales & Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Zbigniew Kalarus
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Jan Steffel
- UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Panos Vardas
- Heart Sector, Hygeia Hospitals Group, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Petar Seferovic
- Faculty of Medicine, Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Thor Edvardsen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hein Heidbuchel
- Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Frank Ruschitzka
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christophe Leclercq
- Cardiologie, CHU Rennes - LTSI Inserm UMR 1099, Université Rennes-1, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mullens W, Auricchio A, Martens P, Witte K, Cowie MR, Delgado V, Dickstein K, Linde C, Vernooy K, Leyva F, Bauersachs J, Israel CW, Lund LH, Donal E, Boriani G, Jaarsma T, Berruezo A, Traykov V, Yousef Z, Kalarus Z, Cosedis Nielsen J, Steffel J, Vardas P, Coats A, Seferovic P, Edvardsen T, Heidbuchel H, Ruschitzka F, Leclercq C. Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2021; 22:2349-2369. [PMID: 33136300 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilfried Mullens
- Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.,University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Angelo Auricchio
- Division of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Pieter Martens
- Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk, Belgium.,University Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Klaus Witte
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin R Cowie
- Imperial College London (Royal Brompton Hospital), London, UK
| | - Victoria Delgado
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cecilia Linde
- Heart and Vascular Theme, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kevin Vernooy
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johann Bauersachs
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Carsten W Israel
- Department of Medicine - Cardiology, Diabetology and Nephrology, Bethel-Clinic, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Lars H Lund
- Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Erwan Donal
- Cardiologie, CHU Rennes - LTSI Inserm UMR 1099, Université Rennes-1, Rennes, France
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Tiny Jaarsma
- Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Vassil Traykov
- Department of Cardiology, Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Zaheer Yousef
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales & Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Zbigniew Kalarus
- Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Jan Steffel
- UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Panos Vardas
- Heart Sector, Hygeia Hospitals Group, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Petar Seferovic
- Faculty of Medicine, Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Thor Edvardsen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hein Heidbuchel
- Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Frank Ruschitzka
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, University Heart Center, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christophe Leclercq
- Cardiologie, CHU Rennes - LTSI Inserm UMR 1099, Université Rennes-1, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Naraparaju V, Almnajam M, Joseph L, Vernon G, Wakefield D, Magnano AR, Tolat A. A survey on patient preferences towards CIED implantation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2021; 21:227-31. [PMID: 33887362 DOI: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation is increasingly performed worldwide with improving safety. Outpatient CIED implantation has similar complication rates compared to those implants which are hospitalized. Here, we analyze patient preferences on discharge timing after CIED implantation. Objective To identify and understand the factors contributing to patient preferences towards same-day or next-day discharge after CIED implantation. Methods One hundred and two patients undergoing new CIED implants were included in the study at two separate hospitals in CT (CT group) and FL (FL group) from 2018-2019. A 7-question survey was administered to the patients after the procedure. Survey responses and demographic data were statistically analyzed. Results Seventy-four percent of CT group and 58% of the FL group responded with a 10 score (0-10) that they were ready to be discharged home the same day (p=0.09). Both groups reported a low number of patients feeling safer by having a remote monitor provided at the time of discharge (44% CT group, 28% FL group; p=0.123). The mean distance of patients living from the hospital in CT group (21.6 miles) was significantly lower than that for the FL group (35.5 miles); p=0.01. Hypertension (86% vs 52%; p=0.0002) and Diabetes mellitus (44% vs 21%; p=0.013) were more prevalent in the FL group compared to the CT group. Conclusion Despite the influence of local practices, the majority of patients preferred same-day discharge after CIED implantation. Improved patient education regarding the ability of remote monitors to provide real-time response to acute events is needed.
Collapse
|
23
|
Thylén I, Jaarsma T, Ingadottir B. Device Adjustment and Recovery in Patients With Heart Failure Undergoing a Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantation: A Longitudinal Study. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2021. [PMID: 33657066 DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about risk factors for poor adjustment to the device after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation in patients with heart failure. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to explore device adjustment and the postoperative recovery of patients with heart failure undergoing elective CRT device implantation. METHODS In this prospective multicenter longitudinal study, data were collected before implantation and after 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year, using validated self-reported instruments and investigator-designed, CRT-specific questions. RESULTS A total of 133 patients, 79% male, with a mean age of 70 ± 10 years, were included. Patients adjusted to the device over time (P < .001), but 20% of patients had difficulties after 2 weeks, and 11% had difficulties at the 1-year follow-up. Fatigue was the most common health problem before surgery (87%), which was reduced to 65% after 1 year, P < .001. Patients' recovery improved over time (P < .001). Device-specific problems with hiccups (7% vs 14%), pulsation around the device (29% vs 24%), tachycardia (28% vs 29%), appearance of the scar (21% vs 17%), and the device bulging out (65% vs 61%) remained unchanged over time, whereas stiffness in the shoulder (64% vs 28%, P < .001) and wound healing (9% vs 2%, P < .05) improved. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with heart failure recover and adjust early after their CRT implantation and improve even more during follow-up. However, recovery and adjustment are problematic for some patients, and many experience bodily discomforts because of the device. Early screening for poor adjustment and psychological distress can lead to appropriate interventions and timely referrals. This is important in the era of remote monitoring with less face-to-face contact.
Collapse
|
24
|
Bautista-Mesa RJ, Lopez-Villegas A, Peiro S, Catalan-Matamoros D, Robles-Musso E, Lopez-Liria R, Leal-Costa C. Long-term cost-utility analysis of remote monitoring of older patients with pacemakers: the PONIENTE study. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:474. [PMID: 33198629 PMCID: PMC7670660 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01883-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cost-effectiveness studies on pacemakers have increased in the last years. However the number of long-term cost-utility studies is limited. The objective of this study was to perform a cost-utility analysis comparing remote monitoring (RM) versus conventional monitoring (CM) in hospital of older patients with pacemakers, 5 years after implant. Methods Under a controlled, not randomized, nor masked clinical trial, 83 patients with pacemakers were initially selected. After five years of follow-up, a total of 55 patients (CM = 34; RM = 21) completed the study. A cost-utility analysis of RM in terms of costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was conducted. The costs from the Public Health System (PHS) as well as patients and their relatives were taken into account for the study. The robustness of the results was verified by the probabilistic analyses through Monte-Carlo simulations. Results After a five-year follow-up period, total costs were lower in the RM group by 23.02% than in the CM group (€274.52 versus €356.62; p = 0.033) because of a cost saving from patients’ perspective (€59.05 versus €102.98; p = 0.002). However, the reduction of in-hospital visits derived from RM exhibited insignificant impact on the costs from the PHS perspective, with a cost saving of 15.04% (€215.48 vs. €253.64; p = 0.144). Costs/QALYs obtained by the RM group were higher as compared to the CM group, although there were no significant differences. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CM in comparison to RM became positive (€301.16). Conclusions This study confirms RM of older patients with pacemakers appears still as a cost-utility alternative to CM in hospital after 5 years of follow-up. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: (Identifier: NCT02234245). Registered 09 September 2014 - Prospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Lopez-Villegas
- Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Group, Hospital de Poniente, El Ejido, s/n, 04700, Almeria, Spain.
| | - Salvador Peiro
- Health Services Research Unit, FISABIO-PUBLIC HEALTH, Valencia, Spain
| | - Daniel Catalan-Matamoros
- Department of Communication Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Health Sciences CTS-451 Research Group, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | - Emilio Robles-Musso
- Pacemaker Unit, Intensive Care Unit, Hospital de Poniente, El Ejido, Almería, Spain
| | - Remedios Lopez-Liria
- Department of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Hum-498 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, Almería, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Daley C, Rohani Ghahari R, Drouin M, Ahmed R, Wagner S, Reining L, Coupe A, Toscos T, Mirro M. Involving patients as key stakeholders in the design of cardiovascular implantable electronic device data dashboards: Implications for patient care. Heart Rhythm O2 2020; 1:136-146. [PMID: 34113868 PMCID: PMC8183860 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Data from remote monitoring (RM) of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) currently are not accessible to patients despite demand. The typical RM report contains multiple pages of data for trained technicians to read and interpret and requires a patient-centered approach to be curated to meet individual user needs. Objective The purpose of this study was to understand which RM data elements are important to patients and to gain design insights for displaying meaningful data in a digital dashboard. Methods Adults with implantable cardioverter–defibrillators (ICDs) and pacemakers (PMs) participated in this 2-phase, user-centered design study. Phase 1 included a card-sorting activity to prioritize device data elements. Phase 2 included one-on-one design sessions to gather insights and feedback about a visual display (labels and icons). Results Twenty-nine adults (mean age 71.8 ± 11.6 years; 51.7% female; 89.7% white) participated. Priority data elements for both ICD and PM groups in phase 1 (n = 19) were related to cardiac episodes, device activity, and impedance values. Recommended replacement time for battery was high priority for the PM group but not the ICD group. Phase 2 (n = 10) revealed that patients would like descriptive, nontechnical terms to depict the data and icons that are intuitive and informative. Conclusion This user-centered design study demonstrated that patients with ICDs and PMs were able to prioritize specific data from a comprehensive list of data elements that they had never seen before. This work contributes to the goal of sharing RM data with patients in a way that optimizes the RM feature of CIEDs for improving patient outcomes and clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly Daley
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana.,Department of BioHealth Informatics, IUPUI School of Informatics and Computing, Indianapolis Indiana
| | - Romisa Rohani Ghahari
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Michelle Drouin
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Ryan Ahmed
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Shauna Wagner
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Lauren Reining
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Amanda Coupe
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana
| | - Tammy Toscos
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana.,Department of BioHealth Informatics, IUPUI School of Informatics and Computing, Indianapolis Indiana
| | - Michael Mirro
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana.,Department of BioHealth Informatics, IUPUI School of Informatics and Computing, Indianapolis Indiana.,Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Salum E, Turner S, Syeda A, Singh SM. Discussions on Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Deactivation in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy: A Missed Opportunity. Can J Cardiol 2020; 37:347-349. [PMID: 32810469 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.03.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Established guidelines discuss end-of-life care in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). It is not known how frequently these discussions take place in patients who have ICDs and are receiving active treatment for cancer. Chart review from a large regional cardiac and cancer center from 2005 to 2019 highlighted that discussions on ICD deactivation were infrequent (28% of patients). Receipt of a palliative care consultation increased the likelihood of patients having discussions on ICD deactivation during this time. Collaboration with palliative care teams may facilitate discussions on ICD deactivation during this opportune time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Salum
- Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Suzette Turner
- Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ambreen Syeda
- Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sheldon M Singh
- Schulich Heart Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
López-Liria R, López-Villegas A, Leal-Costa C, Peiró S, Robles-Musso E, Bautista-Mesa R, Rocamora-Pérez P, Lappegård KT, Catalán-Matamoros D. Effectiveness and Safety in Remote Monitoring of Patients with Pacemakers Five Years after an Implant: The Poniente Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17:ijerph17041431. [PMID: 32102208 PMCID: PMC7068341 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional capacity values immediately after pacemaker (PM) implantation have been well established; however, not much has been known about its long-term effects. The present study compared the long-term effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring plus a clinic visit versus clinic visits alone during follow-up of adults implanted with PMs. This study was a single-centre, controlled, non-randomised, non-blinded clinical trial. Data were collected pre-implantation and after 60 months. The patients in the PONIENTE study were assigned to two different groups: remote monitoring (RM) and conventional monitoring (CM). The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire was used to assess HRQoL and Duke Activity Status Index was used for the functional capacity. After five years, 55 patients completed the study (RM = 21; CM = 34). EuroQol-5D and functional capacity values were improved; however, significant differences were observed only in the EQ5D visual analogue scale (p < 0.001). Remote monitoring was equally feasible, reliable, safe, and clinically useful as CM. The frequencies of rehospitalisations and emergency visits did not differ between the groups. RM was found to be safe and effective in early detection and treatment of medical- and device-related events and in reducing hospital visits. Improved HRQoL was described not only immediately after PM implantation but also extended over a long time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remedios López-Liria
- Department of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Hum-498 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain;
| | - Antonio López-Villegas
- Social Involvement of Critical and Emergency Medicine, CTS-609 Research Team, Hospital de Poniente, 04700 Almeria, Spain
- Institute of Clinical Medicine. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, 9019 Tromsø. Norway;
- Correspondence: (A.L.-V.); (P.R.-P.); Tel.: +34-950-022-935
| | | | - Salvador Peiró
- Health Services Research Unit, FISABIO-PUBLIC HEALTH, 04700 Valencia, Spain;
| | | | | | - Patricia Rocamora-Pérez
- Department of Nursing Science, Physiotherapy and Medicine, Hum-498 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain;
- Correspondence: (A.L.-V.); (P.R.-P.); Tel.: +34-950-022-935
| | - Knut Tore Lappegård
- Institute of Clinical Medicine. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, 9019 Tromsø. Norway;
- Division of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodø, Norway
| | - Daniel Catalán-Matamoros
- Department of Communication Studies, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28903 Madrid, Spain;
- Health Sciences CTS-451 Research Group, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Patel D, Hu P, Hilow H, Lambert CT, Moufawad M, Poe S, Hussein AA, Baranowski B, Bhargava M, Rickard JW, Cantillon DJ, Saliba W, Wilkoff BL, Wazni O, Tarakji KG. The gap between what patients know and desire to learn about their cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2019; 43:118-122. [PMID: 31782195 DOI: 10.1111/pace.13850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancement of digital technology now allows patients to have access to data from their cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, patients' understanding regarding CIED data and perceived personal usability remain unclear. The present study is a prospective survey to examine patients' understanding of their CIEDs and their perception of what is important. METHODS We screened 400 patients between July and December 2018 who presented to our outpatient clinic for a CIED interrogation. Patients received a one-page questionnaire asking baseline demographics, their perception about their own knowledge about their device, and multiple-choice questions in seven basic categories: type of CIED, original indication, functionality, manufacturer, number of active leads, estimated battery life, and number of shocks received. We compared these answers to their interrogation reports to assess accuracy. We also asked participants what they would like to be aware of regarding their CIED. RESULTS From this cohort, 344 of 400 (86%) (62.9 ± 12.8 years and 64 % males) agreed to take the survey and were included in the analysis. At baseline, 63.2% agreed or strongly agreed that they were knowledgeable about their devices. The overwhelming majority of patients demonstrated CIED knowledge deficits in at least one content area (n = 294, 86%), or more than two content areas (n = 176, 51%). Patients agreed or strongly agreed that they had a desire to have information regarding each of the following: battery life (84%), activity level (79%), heart rate trend (75%), and ventricular arrhythmias (74%). CONCLUSION There is a large discrepancy in patients' level of knowledge regarding their CIEDs and their wish to know more details. Future technologies should satisfy providers' goals to educate their patients with basic information and fulfill patients' desire to obtain more data from their CIEDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divyang Patel
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Peter Hu
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Henry Hilow
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Cameron T Lambert
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michelle Moufawad
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Stacy Poe
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ayman A Hussein
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bryan Baranowski
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mandeep Bhargava
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John W Rickard
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Daniel J Cantillon
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Walid Saliba
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Bruce L Wilkoff
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Oussama Wazni
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Khaldoun G Tarakji
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fumagalli S, Pieragnoli P, Haugaa KH, Potpara TS, Rasero L, Ramacciati N, Ricciardi G, Solimene F, Mascia G, Mascioli G, Zuo G, Roberts AT, Marchionni N, Lenarczyk R, Boveda S, Dagres N. The influence of age on the psychological profile of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: results from the Italian population in a multicenter study conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019; 31:1219-1226. [PMID: 30552563 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-018-1088-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are widely used to treat bradyarrhythmias or improve the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). AIMS To evaluate age-related (≤ 75 vs. > 75 years) attitudes, worries, psychological effects and needs in an Italian CIEDs population. METHODS Patients attending their periodical ambulatory evaluation received a questionnaire conceived by the European Heart Rhythm Association Scientific Initiatives Committee as part of a multicenter, multinational snapshot survey. Seven countries participated in the study, and 1646 replies were collected. Of these, 437 (27%) were from Italy. Present results refer to the Italian population only. CIEDs were stratified into devices to treat bradycardia or HF. RESULTS The use of CIEDs was more common in advanced age. Older patients needed less information about CIEDs than younger ones (p = 0.044), who would prefer to be better informed about CIEDs-related consequences on psychologic profile (p = 0.045), physical (p < 0.001) and sexual (p < 0.001) activities, and driving limitations (p = 0.003). When compared to older subjects, younger individuals experienced more difficulties (p = 0.035), especially in their professional (p < 0.001) and private life (p = 0.033), feeling their existence was limited by the device (p < 0.001). Conversely, quality of life (HRQL) more often improved in the elderly (p = 0.001). Information about what to do with CIEDs at the end of life is scant independently of age. CONCLUSIONS HRQL after CIEDs implantation improves more frequently in older patients, while the psychological burden of CIEDs is usually higher in younger patients. End of life issues are seldom discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Fumagalli
- Geriatric Intensive Care Unit and Geriatric Arrhythmia Unit, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
| | - Paolo Pieragnoli
- Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Laura Rasero
- Department of Health Sciences, Department of Health Professions, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Nicola Ramacciati
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ricciardi
- Electrophysiology Laboratory, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giulia Zuo
- Department of Health Sciences, Department of Health Professions, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Anna T Roberts
- Geriatric Intensive Care Unit and Geriatric Arrhythmia Unit, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Niccolò Marchionni
- Geriatric Intensive Care Unit and Geriatric Arrhythmia Unit, University of Florence and AOU Careggi, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Serge Boveda
- Cardiology Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Haugaa KH, Dan GA, Iliodromitis K, Lenarczyk R, Marinskis G, Osca J, Scherr D, Dagres N. Management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of sudden cardiac death-translating guidelines into practice: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace 2019; 20:f249-f253. [PMID: 29878156 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains a partly unsolved task in cardiology. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of SCD published in 2015 considered the new insights of the natural history of diseases predisposing to SCD. The guidelines improved strategies for management of patients at risk of SCD and included both drug and device therapies. The intention of this survey was to evaluate the extent of the disparities between daily clinical practice and the 2015 SCD ESC guidelines among electrophysiology centres in Europe. The results suggest that the adherence to guidelines is reasonably high and strategies for the management of ischaemic disease are well-established. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications for primary prevention are a difficult topic, particularly in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Disparities in the use of genetic testing are probably due to differences in local availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina H Haugaa
- Department of Cardiology and Center for Cardiological Innovation, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gheorghe-Andrei Dan
- Department of Cardiology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine-Colentina University Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Konstantinos Iliodromitis
- Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, OLV Aalst, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Radoslaw Lenarczyk
- Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Disease and Electrotherapy, Silesian Medical University, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Germanas Marinskis
- Clinic of Heart Diseases, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Centre of Cardiology and Angiology, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Joaquin Osca
- Arrhythmia Section, Cardiology Department, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia Spain
| | - Daniel Scherr
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 15, Graz, Austria
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dagres N, Chao TF, Fenelon G, Aguinaga L, Benhayon D, Benjamin EJ, Bunch TJ, Chen LY, Chen SA, Darrieux F, de Paola A, Fauchier L, Goette A, Kalman J, Kalra L, Kim YH, Lane DA, Lip GYH, Lubitz SA, Márquez MF, Potpara T, Pozzer DL, Ruskin JN, Savelieva I, Teo WS, Tse HF, Verma A, Zhang S, Chung MK. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on arrhythmias and cognitive function: what is the best practice? Europace 2019; 20:1399-1421. [PMID: 29562326 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euy046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig, Strümpellstr. 39, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Tze-Fan Chao
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Daniel Benhayon
- Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Memorial Health, Hollywood, FL, USA
| | - Emelia J Benjamin
- Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Framingham Heart Study, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Lin Yee Chen
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Angelo de Paola
- Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Laurent Fauchier
- Service de Cardiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau, Université François Rabelais, Tours, France
| | - Andreas Goette
- Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn, Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Young-Hoon Kim
- Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Deirdre A Lane
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Manlio F Márquez
- Departmen of Electrocardiography, Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Tatjana Potpara
- School of Medicine, Belgrade University, Belgrade, Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | | | - Irina Savelieva
- Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St. George's University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Hung-Fat Tse
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Atul Verma
- Southlake Regional Health Centre, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shu Zhang
- Beijing Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Dagres N, Chao TF, Fenelon G, Aguinaga L, Benhayon D, Benjamin EJ, Bunch TJ, Chen LY, Chen SA, Darrieux F, de Paola A, Fauchier L, Goette A, Kalman J, Kalra L, Kim YH, Lane DA, Lip GYH, Lubitz SA, Márquez MF, Potpara T, Pozzer DL, Ruskin JN, Savelieva I, Teo WS, Tse HF, Verma A, Zhang S, Chung MK, Bautista-Vargas WF, Chiang CE, Cuesta A, Dan GA, Frankel DS, Guo Y, Hatala R, Lee YS, Murakawa Y, Pellegrini CN, Pinho C, Milan DJ, Morin DP, Nadalin E, Ntaios G, Prabhu MA, Proietti M, Rivard L, Valentino M, Shantsila A. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on arrhythmias and cognitive function: What is the best practice? J Arrhythm 2018; 34:99-123. [PMID: 29657586 PMCID: PMC5891416 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Dagres
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Benhayon
- Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA
| | - Emelia J Benjamin
- Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA
| | | | - Lin Yee Chen
- Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
| | | | | | - Angelo de Paola
- Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
| | - Laurent Fauchier
- Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France
| | - Andreas Goette
- Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany
| | - Jonathan Kalman
- Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia
| | | | | | - Deirdre A Lane
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark
| | | | - Manlio F Márquez
- Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico
| | - Tatjana Potpara
- School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia
| | | | | | - Irina Savelieva
- Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK
| | | | - Hung-Fat Tse
- Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China
| | - Atul Verma
- Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada
| | - Shu Zhang
- Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China
| | | | - William-Fernando Bautista-Vargas
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Chern-En Chiang
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Alejandro Cuesta
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Gheorghe-Andrei Dan
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - David S Frankel
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Yutao Guo
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Robert Hatala
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Young Soo Lee
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Yuji Murakawa
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Cara N Pellegrini
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Claudio Pinho
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - David J Milan
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Daniel P Morin
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Elenir Nadalin
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - George Ntaios
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Mukund A Prabhu
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Marco Proietti
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Lena Rivard
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Mariana Valentino
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| | - Alena Shantsila
- Department of Electrophysiology Heart Center Leipzig Leipzig Germany.,Taipei Veterans General Hospital Taipei Taiwan.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil.,Centro Privado de Cardiología Tucumán Argentina.,Cardiac and Vascular Institute Memorial Health Hollywood FL USA.,Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health Framingham Heart Study Boston MA USA.,Intermountain Medical Center Murray UT USA.,Cardiovascular Division Department of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA.,University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil.,Escola Paulista de Medicina Universidade Federal de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil.,Service de Cardiologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Trousseau Université François Rabelais Tours France.,Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine St. Vincenz-Hospital Paderborn Working Group: Molecular Electrophysiology, University Hospital Magdeburg Magdeburg Germany.,Royal Melbourne Hospita lUniversity of Melbourne Melbourne Vic.Australia.,King's College London London UK.,Korea University Medical Center Seoul Korea.,Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK.,Aalborg Thrombosis Research Unit Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark.,Massachusetts General Hospital Boston MA USA.,Departmen of Electrocardiography Instituto Nacional De Cardiologia Mexico City Mexico.,School of Medicine Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia.,Cardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade Serbia.,Instituto de Cardiología de CorrientesCorrientesArgentina.,Cardiology Clinical Academic Group Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute St. George's University of London London UK.,National Heart Centre Singapore City Singapore.,Department of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China.,Southlake Regional Health Centre Newmarket ON Canada.,Beijing Fuwai Hospital Beijing China.,Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dagres N, Chao TF, Fenelon G, Aguinaga L, Benhayon D, Benjamin EJ, Bunch TJ, Chen LY, Chen SA, Darrieux F, de Paola A, Fauchier L, Goette A, Kalman J, Kalra L, Kim YH, Lane DA, Lip GYH, Lubitz SA, Márquez MF, Potpara T, Pozzer DL, Ruskin JN, Savelieva I, Teo WS, Tse HF, Verma A, Zhang S, Chung MK. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS)/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) expert consensus on arrhythmias and cognitive function: what is the best practice? Heart Rhythm 2018; 15:e37-60. [PMID: 29563045 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|