Women's appraisal of the management of vulvodynia by their general practitioner: a qualitative study

Recommendations for patient education in the management of persistent pelvic pain: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

ABSTRACT

Patient education has a critical role in the management of pain. There is considerable heterogeneity in patient education for females with persistent pelvic pain (PPP), and it remains unclear what is considered best clinical practice. Therefore, this systematic review identified and summarised recommendations for patient education in the management of benign gynaecological and urological conditions associated with PPP, as endorsed by international guidelines. Academic and relevant guideline databases were searched from inception to May 2022. Included guidelines were those for the management of benign gynaecological and urological conditions associated with PPP in adult females published in English, of any publication date, and endorsed by a professional organisation or society. Two independent reviewers screened 3097 records; 17 guidelines were included in the review. Guideline quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) tool. Recommendations were pooled using descriptive synthesis. Persistent pelvic pain guideline quality was generally poor. Three guidelines were classified as "excellent" (The NICE, RANZCOG, and ESHRE endometriosis guidelines) and therefore recommended for use. Eleven guidelines (64.7%) recommended patient education for females with PPP. Recommendations for education content were variable, however most frequently covered treatment strategies and pelvic pain diagnoses. For education delivery, the most frequent recommendations were for support groups and written/printed materials. Further research into tailored education interventions is needed for females with PPP.

A mixed methods systematic literature review of barriers and facilitators to help-seeking among women with stigmatised pelvic health symptoms

BACKGROUND

Women's pelvic health is a globally important subject, included in international and United Kingdom health policies, emphasising the importance of improving information and access to pelvic health services. Consequences of pelvic symptoms are intimate, personal, and varied, often causing embarrassment and shame, affecting women's quality of life and wellbeing.

AIM

To understand the experience of seeking healthcare for stigmatised pelvic health symptoms by synthesising all types of published primary research and mapping the results to behavioural theory, to identify potential targets for intervention.

METHODS

Systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, PubMED databases, CDSR and CENTRAL registers, from inception to May 2023 for all types of research capturing women's views and experiences of seeking help with stigmatised urogenital and bowel symptoms. Studies only reporting prevalence, predictors of help-seeking, non-health related help-seeking, or written in languages other than English, German, French, Spanish and Swedish were excluded. Reference checking and forward citation searching for all included studies was performed. A results-based synthesis approach was used to integrate quantitative and qualitative data. Themes were mapped to the Common-Sense model and Candidacy framework. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for critical appraisal. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation - Confidence in Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research for assessing certainty of review findings.

RESULTS

86 studies representing over 20,000 women from 24 high income countries were included. Confidence was high that barriers to help-seeking were similar across all study types and pelvic symptoms: stigma, lack of knowledge, women's perception that clinicians dismissed their symptoms, and associated normalising and deprioritising of low bother symptoms. Supportive clinicians and increased knowledge were key facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Common-Sense Model to explore women's help-seeking behaviour with stigmatised pelvic symptoms reveals problems with cognitive representation of symptom identity, emotional representations of embarrassment and shame, and a subjective norm that women believe their symptoms will be trivialised by clinicians. Together these barriers frustrate women's identification of their candidacy for healthcare. Addressing these issues through behavioural change interventions for women and clinicians, will help to achieve universal access to pelvic healthcare services (United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3.7).

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021256956.

Exploring the health care experiences of women diagnosed with vulvodynia

BACKGROUND

Although seeking diagnosis and treatment for chronic pain should be straightforward, this is not typically the case for those living with vulvodynia, who often describe it as a battle, frequently involving misdiagnosis, dismissal, and gender-based discrimination.

AIM

This study explored the health care experiences of women living with vulvodynia in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

As they are less explored in literature, experiences postdiagnosis and across varying health care settings were specifically considered. Interviews were conducted with 6 women aged 21 to 30 years to explore their experiences when seeking help for vulvodynia.

OUTCOMES

Through interpretative phenomenological analysis, 5 themes emerged: the impact of diagnosis, patients' perception of health care, self-guidance and lack of direction, gender as a barrier to effective care, and a lack of consideration of psychological factors.

RESULTS

Women often experienced difficulties before and after diagnosis, and many felt that their pain was dismissed and ignored due to their gender. Pain management was felt to be prioritized by health care professionals over well-being and mental health.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

There is a need for further exploration of gender-based discrimination experiences among patients with vulvodynia, health care professionals' perceptions of their capabilities in working with such patients, and the impact of improving professionals' training in working with these patients2.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Health care experiences after diagnosis are rarely examined within literature, with studies predominantly focusing on experiences surrounding diagnosis, intimate relationships, and specific interventions. The present study provides an in-depth exploration of health care experiences through participants' lived experiences and gives insight into an underresearched area. Women with negative experiences of health care may have been more likely to participate than those with positive experiences, which may have resulted in their overrepresentation. Furthermore, participants were predominantly young White heterosexual women, and almost all had comorbidities, further limiting generalizability.

CONCLUSION

Findings should be used to inform health care professionals' education and training to improve outcomes for those seeking care for vulvodynia.