Ion and Water Absorption by the Kidney Proximal Tubule: Computational Analysis of Isosmotic Transport

Biophysical Analysis of a Minimalistic Kidney Model Expressing SGLT1 Reveals Crosstalk between Luminal and Lateral Membranes and a Plausible Mechanism of Isosmotic Transport

We extended our model of the S1 tubular segment to address the mechanisms by which SGLT1 interacts with lateral Na/K pumps and tight junctional complexes to generate isosmotic fluid reabsorption via tubular segment S3. The strategy applied allowed for simulation of laboratory experiments. Reproducing known experimental results constrained the range of acceptable model outputs and contributed to minimizing the free parameter space. (1) In experimental conditions, published Na and K concentrations of proximal kidney cells were found to deviate substantially from their normal physiological levels. Analysis of the mechanisms involved suggested insufficient oxygen supply as the cause and, indirectly, that a main function of the Na/H exchanger (NHE3) is to extrude protons stemming from mitochondrial energy metabolism. (2) The water path from the lumen to the peritubular space passed through aquaporins on the cell membrane and claudin-2 at paracellular tight junctions, with an additional contribution to water transport by the coupling of 1 glucose:2 Na:400 H2O in SGLT1. (3) A Na-uptake component passed through paracellular junctions via solvent drag in Na- and water-permeable claudin-2, thus bypassing the Na/K pump, in agreement with the findings of early studies. (4) Electrical crosstalk between apical rheogenic SGLT1 and lateral rheogenic Na/K pumps resulted in tight coupling of luminal glucose uptake and transepithelial water flow. (5) Isosmotic transport was achieved by Na-mediated ion recirculation at the peritubular membrane.

How Münch's adaptation of Pfeffer's circulating water flow became the pressure-flow theory, and the resulting problems - A historical perspective

Long-distance transport of photoassimilates in the phloem of vascular plants occurs as bulk flow in sieve tubes. These tubes are arrays of cells that lose nuclei, cytoskeleton, and some organelles when they differentiate into mature sieve elements. Symplasmic continuity is achieved by perforations that turn the cell walls between adjoining sieve elements into sieve plates. These structural features are interpreted as adaptations that reduce the resistance sieve tubes offer to cytoplasmic bulk flow. According to the common reading of Ernst Münch's pressure-flow theory, the driving forces for these flows are osmotically generated gradients of hydrostatic pressure along the sieve tubes. However, the significance of pressure gradients in the flow direction has also been questioned. Münch himself stated that no detectable pressure gradients existed between the linked osmotic cells that he used to demonstrate the validity of his ideas, and the earliest explanation of osmotically driven flows by Wilhelm Pfeffer, on which Münch based his theory, explicitly claimed the absence of pressure gradients. To resolve the apparent contradiction, we here reconstruct the history of the idea that osmotically driven transport processes in organisms necessarily require steps or gradients of hydrostatic pressure along the transport route. Our analysis leads us to conclude that some defects of overly simplifying interpretations of Münch's ideas (such as the sieve plate fallacy) could be avoided if our descriptions of his theory in textbooks and the scientific literature would follow the logics of the theory's earliest formulations more closely.