Splenic-vasculature involvement is associated with poor prognosis in resected distal pancreatic cancer

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated with Increased Risk of Postoperative DVT After Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: a NSQIP Analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a persistent source of postoperative morbidity despite prevention and mitigation efforts. Cancer, surgery, and chemotherapy are known risk factors for VTE. Existing literature suggests that neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) may contribute to increased VTE risk in the postoperative period, but few authors specifically examine this relationship in distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this study, we analyze the association of NAT and postoperative VTE in patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy (DP) for PDAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database, we analyzed the Procedure Targeted files for pancreatectomy from 2014 to 2020. Adults with PDAC who underwent DP were grouped by receipt of NAT. The primary outcome was the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and the secondary outcome was the rate of pulmonary embolism (PE). We performed univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine risk factors associated with postoperative DVT.

RESULTS

There were 4327 patients with PDAC who underwent DP. Of these, 1414 (32.7%) had NAT. Receipt of NAT was significantly associated with postoperative DVT requiring therapy (3.5% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.02), but was not associated with PE (p = 0.42). On MVA, NAT was associated with a 73% greater chance of developing postoperative DVT [odds ratio (OR) 1.73, 95% CI 1.18-2.55].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who receive NAT prior to DP for PDAC are 73% more likely to develop postoperative DVT compared with upfront resection. As NAT becomes more commonplace, these high-risk patients should be prioritized for guideline-recommended extended duration prophylaxis.

Splenic vein tumor thrombosis is a major prognostic factor in distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of splenic vessel involvement in distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. The aim of the study was to assess its prognostic relevance in a large multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatosplenectomy for distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from 5 pancreatic surgical centers. A pathology review of the surgical specimens was performed to assess splenic vessel involvement, defined as invasion of the vessel's adventitia or deeper, and confirm the presence of splenic vein tumor thrombosis. Prognostic factors associated with overall and relapse-free survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

149 patients underwent upfront surgery. Splenic vascular involvement was observed in 69 of them (46.3%). A parietal infiltration of the splenic artery or splenic vein was observed in 26 (17.5%) and 49 patients (32.8%), respectively. A pathologic tumor thrombosis of the splenic vein was identified in 22 patients (14.8%) and associated with larger tumors (>20 mm) (P = .023), more perineural (P = .017), and lymphovascular (P = .002) invasion, and more positive lymph node (P = .001). After a median follow-up of 50.8 months (95% confidence interval: 44.3-57.3), the cumulative 5-year overall and relapse-free survival were 46.2% and 33%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, in addition to lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio = 1.8; 95% confidence interval [1.1-3.1]; P = .023) and perineural invasion (hazard ratio = 3.5; 95% confidence interval [1.3-9.7]; P = .016), presence of splenic vein tumor thrombosis was the only splenic vascular involvement that affected independently the overall survival (HR = 2.3; 95% confidence interval [ 1.3-4.3]; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

In resectable distal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a pathologic tumor thrombosis of the splenic vein is an independent prognostic factor of overall survival. To define the perioperative oncological strategy, a preoperative evaluation of splenic vessel involvement and thrombosis is needed.

Pancreatic cancer near the splenic hilum has a higher likelihood of splenic vessel invasion and unfavorable survival

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether clinical outcomes varied based on the tumor location within the pancreatic body and tail in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC).

METHODS

Ninety-five patients who had undergone a distal pancreatectomy for resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) PC within the pancreatic body or tail region were retrospectively investigated and divided into four groups (three subgroups of R-PC according to tumor location, and BR-PC): R-PC in the pancreatic body region (group A, n = 24), R-PC on the right side of the pancreatic tail region (group B, n = 17), R-PC on the left side of the pancreatic tail region (group C, n = 29), and BR-PC located in any region within the pancreatic body and tail (group BR, n = 25).

RESULTS

Group C patients showed a higher incidence of pretreatment splenic artery and vein involvement than group A and B patients (splenic artery: 8.3/11.8/41.4%, p < 0.010; splenic vein: 25.0/23.5/79.3%, p < 0.010, in groups A/B/C, respectively). The overall survival of group C patients was significantly unfavorable compared to that of group A and B patients (median: 3.9/4.2/2.3 years in groups A/B/C, p = 0.029, respectively). Pretreatment clinical factors were comparable between group C and group BR. Median survival rates were comparable between group C and BR patients (2.3 and 2.0 years, respectively) (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in anatomical location within the pancreatic body and tail characterize the unfavorable outcomes of PC near the splenic hilum.

CircLMTK2 Silencing Attenuates Gemcitabine Resistance in Pancreatic Cancer by Sponging miR-485-5p and to Target PAK1

Pancreatic cancer (PC) has a high degree of malignancy and poor prognosis, and countless patients have distant metastasis when diagnosed. Gemcitabine (GEM) chemotherapy is one of the main ways of treatment. However, PC cells have been displayed chemoresistance to GEM during treatment. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been demonstrated to be the most popular diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in PC with GEM resistance. Here, we assessed the potential of circLMTK2 in the GEM resistance of PC cells. Functional assays were implemented to measure the impacts of circLMTK2 on the proliferation, migration/invasion, and apoptosis of GEM-resistant PC cells. Bioinformatics analysis and mechanical experiments displayed the underlying mechanism of circLMTK2 in GEM-resistant PC cells. We found that circLMTK2 was upregulated in PC and GEM-resistant PC tissues and cells. CircLMTK2 knockdown suppressed proliferation, invasion, migration, and enhanced apoptosis in GEM-resistant PC cells. Moreover, circLMTK2 silencing could decrease GEM resistance-associated tumor size in vivo. In terms of mechanism, circLMTK2 served as a sponge for miR-485-5p, and miR-485-5p bound to p21 (RAC1) activated kinase 1 (PAK1), which were clarified via the dual-luciferase assay in PC cell lines. We confirmed that circLMTK2 knockdown attenuated GEM-resistant PC cells by regulating PAK1 via miR-485-5p. Our study demonstrated that circLMTK2 may be a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in GEM-resistant PC cells.