The efficacy of rapid on-site evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses

The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Overview and Summary

The recently published WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (World Health Organization [WHO] System) is an international approach to the standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology, updating the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology (PSC System). Significant changes were made to the categorization of benign neoplasms, intraductal neoplasms, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and malignant neoplasms considered low grade. Benign neoplasms, such as serous cystadenoma, categorized as Neoplastic: benign in the PSC system, are categorized as Benign/negative for malignancy in the WHO system. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor, categorized as Neoplastic: other in the PSC system, are categorized as Malignant in the WHO System in accord with their classification in the 5th edition WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours (2019). The two new categories of Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm Low-risk/grade and Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm High-risk/grade are mostly limited to intraductal neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms. Low-risk/grade lesions are mucinous cysts, with or without low-grade epithelial atypia. High-risk/grade lesions contain neoplastic epithelium with high-grade epithelial atypia. Correlation with clinical, imaging, and ancillary studies remains a key tenet. The sections for each entity are written to highlight key cytopathological features and cytopathological differential diagnoses with the pathologist working in low resource setting in mind. Each section also includes the most pertinent ancillary studies useful for the differential diagnosis. Sample reports are provided for each category. Finally, the book provides a separate section with risk of malignancy and management recommendations for each category to facilitate decision-making for clinicians.

Methods to increase the diagnostic efficiency of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: An updated review

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a means to procure adequate specimens for histological and cytologic analysis. The ideal EUS-FNA should be safe, accurate, and have a high sample adequacy rate and low adverse events rate. In recent years, many guidelines and trials on EUS-FNA have been published. The purpose of this article is to provide an update on the influence of some of the main factors on the diagnostic efficiency of EUS-FNA as well as a rare but serious complication known as needle tract seeding.

Patients' Knowledge About the Endoscopic UltrasoundGuided Fine Needle Aspiration of Pancreas Is Not Enough

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to evaluate the extent to which patients acquired necessary knowledge about pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and assess what should be more focused on in the informed consent process.

METHODS

Adult patients enrolled in this study had pancreatic lesions confirmed by regular imaging and planned to undergo the first pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. These patients were asked to complete a questionnaire, including indications, possible results, downstream events, the risk for false-negative and malignant lesions, and so on. Then we conducted a longterm follow-up of these patients to obtain the final results.

RESULTS

Most people (94.25%) correctly recognized that the indication of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration was to exclude malignant lesions. Almost all patients knew that the results could be benign or malignant, while the number of people who were aware of non-diagnostic (22%), indeterminate (18%) outcomes, and the possibility of further testing (20%) after the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration has decreased significantly. Finally, we got that the false-negative rate and percentages of malignancy were 17.81% and 83.91%, while 98% of participants did not recognize that there is a false-negative risk of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and more than 2/3 of participants did not know how much risk they might have for malignant lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of patients who received endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration could identify the indication for this procedure but remained unaware of possible outcomes, downstream events, especially the risk for false-negative and malignant lesions. It is necessary to improve the quality of dialogue between clinicians and patients, and the information about the risk of false-negative and malignancy may need to be emphasized in the informed consent process.

Telecytology versus in-room cytopathologist for EUS-guided FNA or fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Rapid on-site-evaluation (ROSE) with an in-room cytopathologist (ROSE-P) has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of specimens obtained from patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA or fine-needle biopsy sampling (EUS-FNAB) of pancreatic lesions. Recently, there has been an increased interest and use of ROSE using telecytology (ROSE-T) to optimize clinical workflows and to address social distancing mandates created during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic outcomes of ROSE-P and ROSE-T.

METHODS

A single-center cohort study of patients who underwent EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic lesions with ROSE was conducted. The primary outcome was overall diagnostic yield of cancer. All patients who underwent EUS-FNAB were entered into a prospectively maintained database. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics and univariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 165 patients in each arm. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between ROSE-P and ROSE-T (96.4% vs 94.5%, P = .428). ROSE-T was associated with an increased use of 22-gauge needles (P = .006) and more needle passes (P < .001). No significant differences were found in age, gender, lesion size, needle type, procedure times, or adverse events between the 2 groups (P < .05 for all). More pancreatic tail lesions were sampled in the ROSE-P group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ROSE-T was not associated with any difference in final histologic diagnosis for EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic masses. This has important implications for optimizing clinical workflows.

KRAS Mutation Testing on Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration Samples Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology was one of the investigations for pancreatic masses. While the specificity approached 100%, its sensitivity remained low because of high rate of indeterminate and false-negative results. Meanwhile, KRAS gene was frequently mutated in up to 90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its precursor lesions. This study aimed to determine whether KRAS mutation analysis could improve the diagnostic sensitivity in EUS-FNA samples for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The EUS-FNA samples from patients with a pancreatic mass obtained between January 2016 and December 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The cytology results were classified as malignant, suspicious for malignancy, atypical, negative for malignancy, and nondiagnostic. KRAS mutation testing was performed using polymerase chain reaction followed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 126 EUS-FNA specimens were reviewed. The overall sensitivity and specificity by cytology alone were 29% and 100%, respectively. When KRAS mutation testing was performed in cases with indeterminate and negative cytology, the sensitivity increased to 74.2%, and the specificity remained at 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

KRAS mutation analysis, especially when performed in cytologically indeterminate cases, improves the diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This may reduce the need to repeat invasive EUS-FNA for diagnosis.

Atypical cells in fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreas: Causes, work-up, and recommendations for management

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a sensitive and specific method for diagnosing cancer in solid pancreatic masses. However, some cases receive indeterminate atypical diagnoses, which creates management dilemmas. In the 2014 Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) standardized guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology, specimens in the "Atypical" category show a spectrum of architectural and/or cellular changes beyond normal or reactive, but, quantitatively or qualitatively, insufficient for classification as neoplastic (benign/other), suspicious or positive for malignancy. Implementation of the PSC system decreased atypical diagnoses, particularly for cystic lesions, and redistributed many cases into benign and neoplastic categories. Because no set cytologic criteria exist for the "Atypical" category there is wide variability in its use, and its frequency ranges from 0%-16% (mean 6%). It consists of a heterogeneous mix of cases that occur because of preanalytic, lesion-specific (low cellularity, necrosis, cystic, reactive and premalignant changes), to pathologist-dependent factors (experience, expertise, training and institutional case volume). Outcomes of atypical diagnoses in solid pancreatic masses range from benign to premalignant and malignant and include reactive atypia in pancreatitis, well differentiated adenocarcinoma, and non-ductal malignancies. The associated risk of malignancy (ROM) ranges from 28%-100%, with an overall intermediate ROM in large-scale studies. Cytopathologists and institutions should monitor and keep their personal and/or laboratory's atypical rates low by judiciously using rapid onsite evaluation, ancillary studies, consensus or expert review, as well as correlation with clinical and radiologic findings. Early repeat EUS-FNA is indicated for unresolved cases.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and the management of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in western countries. Early diagnosis of pancreatic cancers plays a key role in the management by identification of patients who are surgical candidates. The advancement in the radiological imaging and interventional endoscopy (including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic enteral stenting techniques) has a significant impact in the diagnostic evaluation, staging and treatment of pancreatic cancer. The multidisciplinary involvement of radiology, gastroenterology, medical oncology and surgical oncology is central to the management of patients with pancreatic cancers. This review aims to highlight the diagnostic and therapeutic role of EUS in the management of patients with pancreatic malignancy, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Diagnostic Value of Rapid On-Site Evaluation for CT-Guided Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Occupying Lesions

Objective

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is an effective and efficient auxiliary examination, but its value for CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of pulmonary occupying lesions is unclear. This study is aimed at evaluating the clinical utility of ROSE for CT-guided percutaneous FNA.

Methods

We reviewed 234 patients from September 2018 to April 2019. The result using ROSE was compared with the final pathological diagnosis of CT-guided percutaneous FNA, and we also compared the complications between the ROSE group and the NO-ROSE group. The final pathological diagnosis results served as the gold standard. We also analyzed the diagnostic rate of FNA and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of malignancy. The correlation between diverse pathological types of lung cancer was also taken into consideration.

Results

In total, 132 patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous FNA with ROSE (ROSE group), and 102 did not (NO-ROSE group). The diagnostic rate, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the ROSE group were 91.6%, 89.1%, 94.1%, 93.4%, and 90.1%, respectively. The complication rates of the ROSE group and the NO-ROSE group were 8.33% and 16.67%, respectively. This difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In subsets of adenocarcinoma (AC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients, the ROSE result was highly consistent with the final pathological result.

Conclusion

CT-guided percutaneous FNA combined with ROSE has a high diagnostic rate, sensitivity, and specificity for pulmonary occupying lesions and an acceptable rate of complications. This method is worthy of wide use given its high efficiency and safety.

EUS-FNA, ancillary studies and their clinical utility in patients with mediastinal, pancreatic, and other abdominal lesions

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an important modality to obtain tissue diagnosis from mediastinal, pancreatic, and intra-abdominal lesions in close proximity to the pulmonary and gastrointestinal tract. It is considered to be a relatively safe, rapid, and minimally invasive technique with low complication rates.

AIMS

To determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and outcome of EUS-FNA, with histological correlation where applicable.

METHODS

Data of all 1059 consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2017 at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore was reviewed in this retrospective study. The major sites that were targeted for EUS-FNA were pancreatic (423), mediastinal (376), and other abdominal lesions (260).

RESULTS

The average number of passes per patient was 2.22. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) was adequate in 969 patients (91.4%). Concordance between ROSE and final cytology was 99.5%. Follow-up was available in 810 patients (76.4%). The overall diagnostic yield was 94.3%. Ancillary studies, including immunohistochemical stains and flow cytometry, helped to increase the diagnostic yield from 78.1% to 94.3%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy for EUS-FNA were 94.8%, 98.6%, 99.9%, 65.5%, and 95.1%, respectively. Seven of 1059 patients (0.6%) developed complications.

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA is a very sensitive and specific diagnostic tool with a minimal complication rate. Ancillary studies helped to increase the sensitivity, as well as the diagnostic yield.

Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional smear cytology for EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective randomized noninferiority study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There are limited data on the efficacy of liquid-based cytology (LBC) for EUS-guided FNA specimens. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of LBC for solid pancreatic neoplasms compared with conventional smears (CSs).

METHODS

In this randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients with suspected pancreatic cancer to the LBC group or the CS group. Aspirates from the first needle pass were processed by one method, aspirates from the second pass by the other method, and specimens from the last pass were processed as core biopsy samples. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic efficacy of each method, with the final diagnosis as the gold standard. A noninferiority margin of -10% was assumed.

RESULTS

Of 170 randomized patients, 165 were classified as malignant and 5 as benign. Unsatisfactory samples were less frequent in the LBC group (1.78%) compared with the CS group (5.33%). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of LBC versus CS were 88.0% versus 83.8% (P = .276), 87.7% versus 83.2% (P = .256), 100% versus 100% (P = .999), 100% versus 100% (P = .999), and 16.7% versus 16.1% (P = .953), respectively. A bloody background was significantly more frequent in the CS group (CS, 85.2%; LBC, 1.8%; P < .001), whereas the nuclear features were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic usefulness of LBC was comparable with that of CS. The cytomorphologic features did not differ significantly between the 2 methods, and the reduced bloody backgrounds allowed better visibility in the LBC method. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03606148.).

Castleman disease in the hepatic-gastric space: A case report

BACKGROUND

Castleman disease, also known as giant lymph node hyperplasia, was first reported in 1956. It is a rare benign proliferative pathological change of the lymph nodes.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient, a 33-year-old woman, had epigastric distension for half a year. Examinations were performed in a local hospital. Computed tomography scan showed round soft tissue nodules, about 5.45 cm in diameter, in the hepatic-gastric space. Endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration was performed on the patient. Rapid on-site evaluation, hematoxylin eosin staining and histopathology of the puncture smear was performed. According to the Diff-Quik staining and hematoxylin eosin staining results of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration puncture smears as well as the immunohistochemistry results, Castleman disease was highly suspected. A sufficient preoperative evaluation was made, and a precise surgical plan was developed. Postoperative pathology confirmed Castleman disease.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration can extract internal tissues of the tumor for histological and cytological examinations and provide accurate diagnosis as much as possible. Therefore, a sufficient preoperative evaluation can be made, and a precise surgical plan can be developed.

The Utility of Rapid On-Site Evaluation during Bronchoscopic Biopsy: A 2-Year Respiratory Endoscopy Central Experience

Background

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is commonly used to evaluate the adequacy of biopsy materials in fine-needle aspiration; however, the diagnostic performance of ROSE during fiber optic bronchoscopy (FOB) biopsy under direct vision is rarely reported. Here, we evaluated the role of ROSE during FOB biopsy of visible lesion in trachea or bronchi.

Methods

The role of ROSE was prospectively evaluated in consecutive bronchoscopy specimens obtained between January 2016 and January 2018. The agreement and accuracy between ROSE and final histopathological interpretation were assessed. The frequency and possible reasons for discrepancy between ROSE and definitive histopathology results were identified. Histological and cytological classification was performed according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the American Thoracic Society, and the European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) criteria of lung ADCs classification.

Results

The study enrolled 651 patients, of which 33 were excluded because of insufficient cells. Final diagnosis of malignancy was achieved in 462 cases (74.8%), whereas 156 cases (25.2%) were nonmalignant. ROSE and pathology were well correlated for the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (Kappa = 0.718, p < 0.05), adenocarcinoma (AdC) (Kappa = 0.662; p < 0.05) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (Kappa = 0.955; p < 0.05). In 24 cases diagnosed as malignant by ROSE and nonmalignant by pathology, the lesion tissues were surgically excised and re-analyzed, and the 24 cases were finally confirmed as malignant by pathology.

Conclusions

ROSE technique allows bronchoscopists to obtain viable and adequate material for the diagnosis of histopathology, and provides them with an onsite preliminary diagnosis especially in cases with inconclusive macroscopic appearance. ROSE and pathology should be used in combination to increase the accuracy of diagnosis.

Endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases: advances in tissue acquisition

Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) improved the diagnostic performance and upgraded the role of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) into an interventional modality, able to guide patient management and treatment.This review aimed to highlight the advances, emerging practices, procedural techniques and technological innovations in EUS tissue acquisition in pancreatic diseases. Methods  A thorough review of the literature was performed using PubMed to identify articles that describe techniques, advances, and practices in EUS tissue acquisition in gastrointestinal diseases. Conclusion  Since the first EUS-FNA procedure, EUS guided-tissue acquisition has been evolving continuously. Development of needles with innovative tip design enabled procurement of larger samples with preserved histological architecture. Moreover, sampling techniques and complementary methods, such as contrast harmonic imaging and EUS-elastography, have been introduced in an effort to improve diagnostic performance and sample adequacy.