Intra-corporeal delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: a safe and effective technique

Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

This meta-analysis was conducted to provide updated evidence regarding perioperative safety and efficacy, of IC and EC anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomies. In this study, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the PRISMA guidelines were applied. The study protocol received a PROSPERO registration (CRD42020214596). A systematic literature search of the electronic scholar databases (Medline, Web of Science and Scopus) was performed. To reduce type I error, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) algorithm was introduced. The quality of evidence was evaluated based on the GRADE methodology. In total, 46 studies were included in this meta-analysis, Pooled comparisons and TSA confirmed that IC is superior in terms of incisional hernia (0.29; 95%CI: 0.19, 0.44), open conversion (0.45; 95%CI: 0.30, 0.67), reoperation (0.62; 95%CI: 0.46, 0.84]), LOS (- 0.76; 95%CI: - 1.03, - 0.49), blood loss (- 11.50; 95%CI: - 18.42, - 4.58), and cosmesis (- 1.71; 95%CI: - 2.01, - 1.42). Postoperative pain and return of bowel function were, also, shortened when the anastomosis was fashioned intracorporeally. The grading of most evidence ranged from 'low' to 'high'. Due to the discrepancy in the results of RCTs and non-RCTs, and the proportionally smaller sample size of the former, further randomized trials are required to increase the evidence of this comparison.

Preliminary surgical outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transrectal specimen extraction: a propensity score matching study of 120 cases (with video)

Background

Compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has many advantages. Laparoscopic right colectomy with transvaginal specimen extraction has been reported, but the safety and feasibility of transrectal specimen extraction in male patients with ascending colon cancer remain to be verified. This study aimed to preliminarily evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transrectal specimen extraction.

Methods

The study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center in China. A total of 494 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy between September 2018 and September 2020 were included. Transrectal specimen extraction was performed in 40 male patients (the NOSES group). Patients in the NOSES group were matched to the conventional laparoscopic group using propensity score matching at a 1:2 ratio. Short-term and long-term outcomes between the two groups were compared and evaluated.

Results

Forty patients in the NOSES group and 80 patients in the conventional laparoscopic group were matched for analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced after propensity matching. The operative features, including operating time, intraoperative bleeding, and the number of harvested lymph nodes, were statistically comparable in both groups. In terms of post-operative recovery, patients in the NOSES group showed preferable outcomes, as evidenced by less post-operative pain and faster return to flatus, defecation, and discharge. The post-operative complications rate, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system, was similar in both groups. No differences in overall survival or disease-free survival were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic right colectomy with transrectal specimen extraction is oncologically safe. Compared with conventional laparoscopic right colectomy, it can reduce post-operative pain, accelerate post-operative recovery, shorten the hospital stay, and achieve better cosmetic effect.

Comparing the short-term results of the improved triangular anastomosis technique for complete laparoscopic radical resection of sigmoid colon cancer and laparoscopic-assisted small incision colon reconstruction: A CONSORT study

The laparoscopic approaches using the triangular anastomosis technique for sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) are rare. This CONSORT study explored the short-term effects of laparoscopic radical resection of SCC with modified triangular anastomosis technique and laparoscopic-assisted small incision colon cancer reconstruction surgery. From April 2019 to January 2021, a total of 86 patients with SCC who were admitted to Luopu County People's Hospital were selected and received radical resection. Patients were divided into 2 groups using a random number table method: in the control group, patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted small-incision reconstruction surgery, and patients in the observation group underwent complete laparoscopic surgery with modified triangular anastomosis technique. The 2 groups were compared in perioperative related indicators and postoperative complications. After 3 months follow-up, local tumor recurrence and metastasis, abdominal wall puncture and implantation, and death were observed. Compared to the control group, shorter operation time, gastrointestinal reconstruction time, postoperative exhaust time, hospitalization time, and less intraoperative blood loss, and lower probability of complications were observed in the observation group (P < .05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections between the 2 groups (P > .05). After 3 months of follow-up, no local tumor recurrence, distant tumor metastasis, abdominal wall puncture implantation, and death were found in the 2 groups of patients. It is indicated that the improved triangular anastomosis technique for complete laparoscopic radical resection of SCC is effective in treatment for SCC.

Avoidance of urinary drainage during perioperative period of open elective colonic resection within enhanced recovery after surgery programme

Background

Urinary catheterization (UC) is a conventional perioperative measure for major abdominal operation. Optimization of perioperative catheter management is an essential component of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme. We aimed to investigate the risk factors of urinary retention (UR) after open colonic resection within the ERAS protocol and to assess the feasibility of avoiding urinary drainage during the perioperative period.

Methods

A total of 110 colonic-cancer patients undergoing open elective colonic resection between July 2014 and May 2018 were enrolled in this study. All patients were treated within our ERAS protocol during the perioperative period. Data on patients’ demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were collected and analysed retrospectively.

Results

Sixty-eight patients (61.8%) underwent surgery without any perioperative UC. Thirty patients (27.3%) received indwelling UC during the surgical procedure. Twelve (10.9%) cases developed UR after surgery necessitating UC. Although patients with intraoperative UC had a lower incidence of post-operative UR [0% (0/30) vs 15% (12/80), P = 0.034], intraoperative UC was not testified as an independent protective factor in multivariate logistic analysis. The history of prostatic diseases and the body mass index were strongly associated with post-operative UR. Six patients were diagnosed with post-operative urinary-tract infection, among whom two had intraoperative UC and four were complicated with post-operative UR requiring UC.

Conclusion

Avoidance of urinary drainage for open elective colonic resection is feasible with the implementation of the ERAS programme as the required precondition. Obesity and a history of prostatic diseases are significant predictors of post-operative UR.

Comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis and resection in right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic surgery is the standard surgical approach for colon cancer. However, there is no standard surgery for right colectomy. Selection between total laparoscopic right colectomy (TLRC) and laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy (LARC) is a topic of interest. In this systematic review, we compared the short-term outcomes of TLRC and LARC in the treatment of right colon cancer.

METHODS

We identified studies (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase) comparing TLRC and LARC up to February 2021. Surgical duration; volume of intraoperative blood loss; number of harvested lymph nodes; incision length; hospitalization duration; time to first flatus; time to first defecation; and anastomotic leakage, ileus, and wound infection were compared.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (TLRC, 1948 patients; LARC, 2369 patients) were evaluated. All studies were retrospective, except seven prospective studies, three RCTs, and three case-control studies. TLRC demonstrated lesser intraoperative blood loss volume (P < 0.01), less frequent intraoperative conversion to laparotomy (P = 0.02), shorter hospitalization duration (P < 0.01), smaller incision length (P < 0.01), shorter time to first flatus (P < 0.01) and first defecation (P < 0.01), and lesser frequent wound infection (P < 0.01) compared with LARC. The surgical duration, number of harvested lymph nodes, anastomotic leakage, and ileus were similar between TLRC and LARC (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TLRC is associated with significantly earlier bowel recovery, lesser blood loss, smaller incision length, lower rate of conversion, shorter hospitalization duration, and lesser frequent wound infection compared with LARC.

A novel and simple technique to close the enterotomy after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy

We developed a new technique to reduce the length of the enteric defect to be closed during intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH), also avoiding the need to suture the first part of the anastomosis in a deep space with an acute angle. From January 2017, after the ileo-colic anastomosis was completed, an additional stapler cartridge was applied starting at the colonic rim and including the small bowel part of the anastomosis. The isoperistaltic fashion of the ileo-colonic anastomosis was maintained. The remaining defect left to be closed was 2-3 cm. We compared the results of the novel technique with those of the 'standard' closure (full-length enterotomy). In the last 30 months, this technique was successfully used in 32 patients (Group A), compared with 33 patients (2012-2016) operated with 'standard' closure (Group B). Age, BMI and post-operative stage distribution were similar. The mean operative time was 175.2 min (± 36.7) in Group A and 165.9 min (± 42.5) in Group B (p = ns), with 53.1% and 27.3% of associated procedures (cholecystectomy, ovariectomy, etc.), respectively (p < 0.05). Overall morbidity rate was 28.1% and 30.3% (Group A vs Group B, p = ns), with no anastomotic bleeding/leak in either group. This technique, which simplifies the closure of the enteric defect after LRH with intracorporeal anastomosis is safe, reproducible and easy to learn. It might help more surgeons to perform a fully laparoscopic procedure in right hemicolectomy, offering the advantages of intracorporeal anastomosis to their patients.

Satisfactory short-term outcome of total laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal in obese patients: a comparative study with open techniques

Reversal of loop ileostomy after colorectal surgery in obese patients can be challenging and total laparoscopic (TLAP) approach may be beneficial. This study aims to compare short-term outcomes of TLAP and open approaches in obese patients undergoing loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. A retrospective review was performed for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery previously and underwent loop ileostomy reversal between January 2017 and April 2020. TLAP and open cases performed in obese patients were identified and compared for the following outcomes: baseline characteristics, operative outcomes, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. TLAP or open-loop ileostomy reversal was performed on 30 and 34 patients, respectively. TLAP approach was associated with a similar operation time and blood loss compared with an open approach (P > 0.05). The median length of incision for stoma removal was significantly shorter in the TLAP group than in the open group (6.5 cm vs. 8.5 cm; P < 0.05), and a lower incidence of incisional infection was also noted in the TLAP group (6.7% vs. 26.5%; P < 0.05). The groups were comparable as regards the time to ground activities and length of hospitalization (P > 0.05), but the time to first flatus was decreased (2.0 vs. 3.0 days; P < 0.05). This retrospective study demonstrated that TLAP loop ileostomy reversal may have a satisfactory short-term outcome for obese patients after laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, with a shorter incisional length and a lower incidence of incisional infection as well as an earlier time to first flatus.