COVID-19 pandemic impact on trajectories in cardiometabolic health, physical activity and functioning among adults from the 2006-2020 Health and Retirement Study

Functional limitations in 2004-22 among Europeans aged 55-69 years: time trends according to labor market group and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic

In terms of work ability, impacts of the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on functional ability warrant investigation. The aim is to explore trends in functional limitations in 2004-22 focusing on the impacts of the pandemic among older working-aged Europeans in different labor market groups and at different levels of COVID-19 stringency policies. Data come from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) collected in 2004-22. Individuals aged 55-69 years from 27 countries were included (N = 245 060). Outcome was functional limitations (Global Activity Limitation Index). Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze time trends and COVID-19 impacts within labor market groups and at different levels of COVID-19 stringency policies. In 2004-22, the likelihood of functional limitations increased slightly among men but remained the same among women. Functional limitations were more likely in countries with low and moderate as compared to high COVID-19 stringency (which represents mostly Southern Europe) in both women and men. During the ∼1st year of the pandemic, likelihood of functional limitations decreased especially in countries with moderate COVID-19 stringency. Decreases were observed in all labor market groups. During the ∼2nd year of the pandemic, the likelihood of functional limitations increased in time but not statistically significantly in most groups. Policymakers should be aware of trends in functional limitations and the impacts of policy decisions while pursuing to prolong work careers. Further investigation is required to verify our findings and to explore underlying reasons behind the decreases in functional limitations after the pandemic.

Work- and mental health-related events and body mass index trajectories during the Covid-19 lockdown. Evidence from the lifelines cohort study in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify heterogeneity in trajectories of body mass index (BMI) during the Covid-19 pandemic in the Netherlands. Moreover, we aimed to investigate whether work- and mental health-related disruptive events experienced during the pandemic, such as job insecurity or depression, were associated with such BMI trajectories.

METHODS

Longitudinal data from the Lifelines Covid Questionnaire was used (21 waves between April 2020 and July 2021; n = 64,630). Different trajectories were identified using group-based trajectory models. Multinomial regression models were fitted to analyse the main determinants of experiencing changes in BMI during the pandemic.

RESULTS

Trajectories of increased BMI, and, to a lesser extent also trajectories of decreased BMI, were more common among those who experienced disruptive work-related events (e.g., being laid-off or having a temporary contract) and mental health-related events (e.g., anxiety or depression) during the pandemic. Those experiencing multiple events were particularly likely to show trajectories of increased or decreased BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

During the Covid-19 pandemic, strong heterogeneity was observed in BMI trajectories. This was partially related to work- and mental health-related events.

Cardiometabolic Changes in Sirtuin1-Heterozygous Mice on High-Fat Diet and Melatonin Supplementation

A hypercaloric fatty diet predisposes an individual to metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular complications. Sirtuin1 (SIRT1) belongs to the class III histone deacetylase family and sustains anabolism, mitochondrial biogenesis, and fat distribution. Epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) is involved in inflammation, whilst interscapular brown adipose tissue (iBAT) drives metabolism in obese rodents. Melatonin, a pineal indoleamine, acting as a SIRT1 modulator, may alleviate cardiometabolic damage. In the present study, we morphologically characterized the heart, eWAT, and iBAT in male heterozygous SIRT1+/- mice (HET mice) on a high-fat diet (60%E lard) versus a standard rodent diet (8.5% E fat) and drinking melatonin (10 mg/kg) for 16 weeks. Wild-type (WT) male C57Bl6/J mice were similarly fed for comparison. Cardiomyocyte fibrosis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response worsened in HET mice on a high-fat diet vs. other groups. Lipid peroxidation, ER, and mitochondrial stress were assessed by 4 hydroxy-2-nonenal (4HNE), glucose-regulated protein78 (GRP78), CCAA/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP), heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), and mitofusin2 immunostainings. Ultrastructural analysis indicated the prevalence of atypical inter-myofibrillar mitochondria with short, misaligned cristae in HET mice on a lard diet despite melatonin supplementation. Abnormal eWAT adipocytes, crown-like inflammatory structures, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and iBAT whitening characterized HET mice on a hypercaloric fatty diet and were maintained after melatonin supply. All these data suggest that melatonin's mechanism of action is strictly linked to full SIRT1 expression, which is required for the exhibition of effective antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.

Effect of Personalized Risk-Reduction Strategies on Cognition and Dementia Risk Profile Among Older Adults: The SMARRT Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Modifiable risk factors are hypothesized to account for 30% to 40% of dementia; yet, few trials have demonstrated that risk-reduction interventions, especially multidomain, are efficacious.

Objective

To determine if a personalized, multidomain risk reduction intervention improves cognition and dementia risk profile among older adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Systematic Multi-Domain Alzheimer Risk Reduction Trial was a randomized clinical trial with a 2-year personalized, risk-reduction intervention. A total of 172 adults at elevated risk for dementia (age 70-89 years and with ≥2 of 8 targeted risk factors) were recruited from primary care clinics associated with Kaiser Permanente Washington. Data were collected from August 2018 to August 2022 and analyzed from October 2022 to September 2023.

Intervention

Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (personalized risk-reduction goals with health coaching and nurse visits) or to a health education control.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was change in a composite modified Neuropsychological Test Battery; preplanned secondary outcomes were change in risk factors and quality of life (QOL). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Linear mixed models were used to compare, by intention to treat, average treatment effects (ATEs) from baseline over follow-up. The intervention and outcomes were initially in person but then, due to onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, were remote.

Results

The 172 total participants had a mean (SD) age of 75.7 (4.8) years, and 108 (62.8%) were women. After 2 years, compared with the 90 participants in the control group, the 82 participants assigned to intervention demonstrated larger improvements in the composite cognitive score (ATE of SD, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.25; P = .02; a 74% improvement compared with the change in the control group), better composite risk factor score (ATE of SD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01-0.20; P = .03), and improved QOL (ATE, 0.81 points; 95% CI, -0.21 to 1.84; P = .12). There were no between-group differences in serious adverse events (24 in the intervention group and 23 in the control group; P = .59), but the intervention group had greater treatment-related adverse events such as musculoskeletal pain (14 in the intervention group vs 0 in the control group; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, a 2-year, personalized, multidomain intervention led to modest improvements in cognition, dementia risk factors, and QOL. Modifiable risk-reduction strategies should be considered for older adults at risk for dementia.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03683394.

Changes in Fall Rates From Before to During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From the Prospective AMBROSIA Study

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) social distancing policies resulted in reductions in community movement, however, fall rates during this time have not been described.

METHODS

This prospective study included adults ≥65 years old participating in the Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Older Adults (AMBROSIA) cohort and who completed ≥1 monthly falls calendar (August 2019-March 2021; n = 250). Months were grouped to correspond to the fall 2020 phased reopening (August-October) and the shelter-in-place policy during the winter 2020 surge (November-January) in Los Angeles, California and compared to the same months, 1 year earlier (ie, before the pandemic).

RESULTS

Participants had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 75.2 (6.1) years, 49.6% were White, and 53.2% were women. We obtained 2 795 falls calendars during follow-up. Overall, 110 (44.0%) participants reported a total of 421 falls (rate 15.1 per 100 calendar months). The highest monthly fall rate during the pandemic was 22.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.4-31.1) per 100 calendar-months in August 2020. The lowest fall rate during the pandemic was 8.6 (95% CI 3.5-17.8) per 100 calendar-months in February 2021. During the pandemic, fall rates in August, September, and October 2020 were higher than the previous year (rate ratio 1.8 [95% CI 1.1-2.9]), and fall rates in November and December 2020 and January 2021 were lower than the previous year (rate ratio 0.5 [95% CI 0.4-0.8]).

CONCLUSION

As the pandemic continues and older adults resume community mobility after a shelter-in-place period, providers should pay attention to the risk of falls.

Cognitive decline among older adults with heart diseases before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal cohort study

Background

Little is known about the impact induced by the COVID-19 pandemic on the cognitive function of older adults with heart diseases. This study aimed to examine whether older adults with heart diseases suffered larger cognitive deterioration during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This study leveraged longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), a nationally representative U.S. aging cohort with objective cognitive assessments measured before and during the pandemic. The interval from HRS waves 13 to 14 (April 2016 to June 2019) was defined as the pre-pandemic period to control the pre-existed cognitive difference between participants with and without heart diseases, and the interval from waves 14 to 15 (June 2019 to June 2021) was defined as the pandemic period. The HRS wave 14 survey was considered the baseline. The heart disease status was defined by a self-reported diagnosis. Linear mixed models were performed to evaluate and compare the cognitive differences during different periods.

Results

A total of 9,304 participants (women: 5,655, 60.8%; mean age: 65.8 ± 10.8 years) were included, and 2,119 (22.8%) had heart diseases. During the pre-pandemic period, there was no significant difference (-0.03, 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.15, P = 0.716) in the changes in global cognitive scores between participants with and without heart disease. During the pandemic period, a larger decreased change in the global cognitive score was observed in the heart disease group compared with the non-heart disease group (-0.37, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.19, P < 0.001). An enlarged difference in global cognitive score was observed during the pandemic period (-0.33, 95% CI: -0.65 to -0.02, P = 0.036).

Conclusion

The findings demonstrated that the population with heart diseases suffered more cognitive decline related to the pandemic, underscoring the necessity to provide immediate cognitive monitoring and interventions for the population with heart diseases.

COVID-19 pandemic experiences of older adults with dementia in community and residential care settings: Results from a US national survey

Introduction

Investigations into consequences of the US COVID-19 pandemic for older adults with dementia have been limited.

Methods

We used the National Health and Aging Trends Study to examine self-reported COVID-19 infection; measures taken to limit its spread; social, behavioral, and emotional responses to the pandemic; and changes in health-care use and provider communication. We compared adults aged ≥70 with and without dementia in community and residential care settings.

Results

In residential care settings, infection was substantially higher and social contact less common for those with dementia. In community and residential care settings, those with dementia had 2 to 3 times the odds of reporting sleeping more often. In residential care settings, those with dementia were less likely to put off care and more likely to start telehealth.

Discussion

Findings highlight the disproportionate social and behavioral consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for those living with dementia, particularly in residential care settings.

HIGHLIGHTS

Data are from the nationally representative National Health and Aging Trends Study.COVID-19 infection was higher in residential care settings for those with dementia.Social contact was less common for those with dementia in residential care.Pandemic-related coping behaviors differed by dementia and residential status.In residential care, those with dementia were less likely to delay health care.

Determinants of COVID-19 Outcome as Predictors of Delayed Healthcare Services among Adults ≥50 Years during the Pandemic: 2006-2020 Health and Retirement Study

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) was declared a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. To date, a limited number of studies have examined the impact of this pandemic on healthcare-seeking behaviors of older populations. This longitudinal study examined personal characteristics linked to COVID-19 outcomes as predictors of self-reported delayed healthcare services attributed to this pandemic, among U.S. adults, ≥50 years of age.

METHODS

Secondary analyses were performed using cross-sectional data (1413 participants) and longitudinal data (2881 participants) from Health and Retirement Study (HRS) (2006-2018) linked to the 2020 HRS COVID-19 Project (57% female, mean age: 68 years). Demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle and health characteristics were evaluated in relation to delayed overall, surgical and non-surgical healthcare services ("Since March 2020, was there any time when you needed medical or dental care, but delayed getting it, or did not get it at all?" and "What type of care did you delay") using logistic regression and Ensemble machine learning for cross-sectional data as well as mixed-effects logistic modeling for longitudinal data.

RESULTS

Nearly 32.7% delayed healthcare services, 5.8% delayed surgical services and 31.4% delayed non-surgical services. Being female, having a college degree or higher and 1-unit increase in depression score were key predictors of delayed healthcare services. In fully adjusted logistic models, a history of 1 or 2 cardiovascular and/or metabolic conditions (vs. none) was associated with 60-70% greater odds of delays in non-surgical services, with distinct findings for histories of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and stroke. Ensemble machine learning predicted surgical better than overall and non-surgical healthcare delays.

CONCLUSION

Among older adults, sex, education and depressive symptoms are key predictors of delayed healthcare services attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic. Delays in surgical and non-surgical healthcare services may have distinct predictors, with non-surgical delays more frequently observed among individuals with a history of 1 or 2 cardiovascular and/or metabolic conditions.

Predictors of Covid-19 level of concern among older adults from the health and retirement study

The purpose of this longitudinal study is to construct a prediction model for Covid-19 level of concern using established Covid-19 socio-demographic, lifestyle and health risk characteristics and to examine specific contributions of obesity-related cardiometabolic health characteristics as predictors of Covid-19 level of concern among a representative sample of U.S. older adults. We performed secondary analyses of existing data on 2872 2006–2020 Health and Retirement Study participants and examined 19 characteristics in relation to the outcome of interest using logistic regression and machine learning algorithms. In mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models, a history of diabetes, stroke as well as 1–2 cardiometabolic risk factors and/or chronic conditions were associated with greater Covid-19 level of concern, after controlling for confounders. Female sex, birth cohort, minority race, Hispanic ethnicity and total wealth as well as depressive symptoms were associated with higher level of Covid-19 concern, and education was associated with lower level of Covid-19 concern in fully adjusted mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models. The selected socio-demographic, lifestyle and health characteristics accounted for < 70% of the variability in Covid-19 level of concern based on machine learning algorithms. Independent risk factors for Covid-19 level of concern among U.S. older adults include socio-demographic characteristics and depressive symptoms. Advanced research is needed to identify relevant predictors and elucidate underlying mechanisms of observed relationships.