Attributions for Everyday Discrimination and All-Cause Mortality Risk Among Older Black Women: A Latent Class Analysis Approach

Factors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Background

Discrimination in healthcare settings impedes quality care, leading to poorer health outcomes.

Objective

To examine racial differences in perceived discrimination in healthcare settings across age among middle-aged and older adults and identify factors associated with these experiences.

Design

Longitudinal cohort data from the Health and Retirement Study collected between 2008 and 2020.

Participants

The sample included 17,478 United States adults aged 50 and older who had at least one doctor visit or hospitalization in the prior two years.

Main Measures

Self-reported perceived discrimination in healthcare settings, measured using an item from the Everyday Discrimination Scale and categorized as "never" versus "ever" experienced discrimination. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify factors associated with experiencing discrimination. Assessed factors included sociodemographic (age, gender, marital status, education, wealth, insurance status, employment) and clinical characteristics (depressive symptoms, difficulty with activities of daily living [ADLs], number of doctor visits, hospitalizations, body mass index [BMI], and comorbidities).

Results

Black adults were significantly more likely to experience discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults, and these disparities were most pronounced at younger ages. Factors associated with higher odds of reporting discrimination included Black race, male gender, not being married, being uninsured, higher educational attainment, depressive symptoms, difficulty with ADLs, history of arthritis, and higher BMI. In race-stratified analyses, unemployment was associated with higher odds of reporting discrimination among Black adults. Among White adults, being unmarried and uninsured were significant factors associated with discrimination.

Conclusions and Relevance

Black adults reported higher rates of perceived discrimination in healthcare settings than White adults, especially during middle adulthood. Multiple sociodemographic and clinical factors were associated with these experiences. These findings underscore the need to address discrimination in healthcare to improve patient-provider relationships among middle-aged and older adults.

Everyday discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke in midlife women

Disparities between Black and White women in stroke risk in the United States are present during midlife, a period during which subclinical indicators of stroke risk accelerate in women. Racism and forms of discrimination have long been associated with cardiovascular pathophysiology. However, few studies have examined midlife discrimination among women and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, a strong predictor of stroke and myocardial infarction. The Everyday Discrimination Scale, which measures discriminatory experiences, was administered to 304 (including 120 White and 76 Black) midlife women (mean age = 54, SD = 3.9) free of clinical cardiovascular disease. At the same visit, using ultrasonography, we measured four markers of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis, including plaque count, grey scale median, and maximum plaque height. The majority (85%) of women experienced at least one form of discrimination in their daily life. Black women reported experiencing greater discrimination than White women with a mean (SD) Everyday Discrimination Score of 7.3 (5.2) versus 5.7 (4.3). These experiences were most attributed to race, age, income, and "other." Black participants had a higher prevalence of carotid plaque compared to White participants (52% versus 46%). Using Poisson regression, higher discrimination was associated with higher plaque count among Black women only, adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and education, such that one standard deviation increase in the Everyday Discrimination Scale was associated with a 25% higher plaque count. Further adjusting for financial strain did not reduce the effect size. We did not observe an association between discrimination and other carotid plaque measures in Black or White women. In Black women, higher levels of discrimination was associated with greater carotid atherosclerosis. Clarifying the relationship between discrimination and subclinical indicators of stroke risk could inform social and healthcare interventions to reduce discrimination and potential associated stroke risk.

Shaping the future of geriatric chronic pain care: a research agenda for progress

Chronic pain is highly prevalent among older adults and its burden will become increasingly significant as our population ages. Yet, chronic pain is often undertreated in this vulnerable population due to various barriers in health care delivery. To improve geriatric chronic pain management, we assert that older adults require a dedicated research agenda designed to inform the development, testing, and implementation of chronic pain treatments that account for the unique vulnerabilities and healthcare needs of this population. Specifically, we propose that the following four areas of research require immediate attention to better serve older adults with chronic pain: (1) health equity, (2) substance use, (3) dyadic interventions, and (4) digital health. Our proposed research agenda aims to create a more robust and comprehensive body of evidence that will ultimately transform and advance geriatric chronic pain management.

An Investigation Into the Role of Attributions of Discrimination and Cognitive Functioning in Older Adults

ObjectiveLimited research has explored how the attributions of discrimination in later life are related to cognitive functioning.MethodsWe analyzed responses from 12,279 adults ages 65+ in the 2008 to 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. Multilevel mixed models assessed whether cognitive functioning was associated with (1) everyday discrimination (without reference to attribution) and (2) frequency of 11 attributions of discrimination.ResultsDescriptive analyses highlighted variability in the characteristics associated with specific attributions of discrimination. We found that age was the most reported attribution of discrimination, followed by gender. Discrimination was associated with worse cognitive functioning, and frequent reports of certain attributions of discrimination (e.g., disability, sexual orientation) were associated with cognitive functioning.DiscussionThese results suggested that discrimination was harmful for cognitive health and that the perceived reasons for discrimination may have unique and negative implications for cognitive functioning among older adults.

Race/Ethnicity, Nativity, and Gender Disparities in Mental Health Trajectories from Mid- to Later-Life: A Life Course-Intersectional Approach

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have highlighted mental health disparities based on race/ethnicity, nativity, and gender across different life stages. However, few have investigated how the intersectionality of these factors influences mental health trajectories during midlife to late life. This study fills this gap by adopting a life course-intersectional approach, viewing mental health trajectories as dynamic processes shaped by the combined influences of race/ethnicity, nativity, and gender. It explores social, psychological, and physiological pathways contributing to these disparities.

DESIGN

Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (2006-2018; N = 38,049 observations) and growth curve models, this study examines how intra-individual trends in depressive symptoms (measured as CES-D scale, 07) are influenced by the intersection of race/ethnicity, nativity, and gender. It also investigates the impact of objective and subjective social isolation and physical health on group disparities in mental health trajectories.

RESULTS

The findings reveal that, during mid- to early late-life, most Black and Hispanic Americans experience higher levels of depressive symptoms compared to their White counterparts (disparities ranging from 0.184 to 0.463 for men and 0.117 to 0.439 for women). However, this disadvantage diminishes for US-born Hispanic men and US-born Black women (0.014-0.031 faster decrease rates compared to US-born White), while it intensifies for Hispanic immigrants (0.017-0.018 slower decrease rates compared to US-born White) in advanced ages. Mediation analysis demonstrates that both social isolation and physical health contribute to these disparities, with physical health explaining a larger portion, particularly in differences between immigrant Hispanic women and US-born Whites.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the importance of a life course-intersectional approach in understanding mental health disparities. It emphasizes the need for improved social welfare systems and community-level interventions targeting the specific challenges faced by older Hispanic immigrants, especially women who encounter multiple forms of oppression.

Immigrant and Racialized Populations' Cumulative Exposure to Discrimination and Associations with Long-Term Conditions During COVID-19: A Nationwide Large-Scale Study in Canada

BACKGROUND

This cross-sectional study examines associations between the race-migration nexus, cumulative exposure to intersectional discrimination (2 years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic), and long-term conditions.

METHODS

A nationwide self-selected sample (n = 32,605) was obtained from a Statistics Canada's Crowdsourcing online survey from August 4 to 24, 2020. Binary and multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine disparities by the race-migration nexus in accumulative experiences of multiple situations- and identity-based discrimination and their relations with long-term conditions, after controlling for sociodemographic covariates.

RESULTS

During the pandemic, discrimination stemming from racialization - such as race/skin color (24.4% vs 20.1%) and ethnicity/culture (18.5% vs 16.5%) - and cyberspace (34.1% vs 29.8%) exaggerated relative to pre-pandemic period; compared to Canadian-born (CB) whites, the likelihood of experiencing multiple discrimination increased alongside the domains of discrimination being additively intersected (e.g., identity-based, all p's < 0.001) among CB racialized minorities (ORs 2.08 to 11.78), foreign-born (FB) racialized minorities (ORs 1.99 to 12.72), and Indigenous populations (ORs 1.62 to 8.17), except for FB whites (p > 0.01); dose-response relationships were found between cumulative exposure to multiple discrimination and odds of reporting long-term conditions (p's < 0.001), including seeing (ORs 1.63 to 2.99), hearing (ORs 1.83 to 4.45), physical (ORs 1.66 to 3.87), cognitive (ORs 1.81 to 3.79), and mental health-related impairments (ORs 1.82 to 3.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a universal health system, Canadians who are CB/FB racialized and Indigenous populations, have a higher prevalence of cumulative exposure to different aspects of discrimination that are associated with multiple long-term conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Equity-driven solutions are needed to tackle upstream determinants of health inequalities through uprooting intersectional discrimination faced by racialized and immigrant communities.

Chronic Pain Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States: The Role of Everyday Discrimination and Racial/Ethnic Identity

Chronic pain disproportionately affects middle-aged and older adults in the United States. Everyday discrimination is associated with worse pain outcomes and is more prevalent among adults from racial/ethnic minoritized groups. Yet, there is limited evidence on relationships between everyday discrimination and chronic pain among middle-aged and older adults, as well as how discrimination and racial/ethnic identity may interact to influence this relationship. We used the 2018 Health and Retirement study to evaluate associations between exposure to everyday discrimination and odds to experience any, severe, and high-impact chronic pain among 5,314 Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White adults over the age of 50. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the main and interaction effects of everyday discrimination on the odds of chronic pain (any, severe, and high-impact) across racial/ethnic groups. Results showed that Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black middle-aged and older adults had a higher, unadjusted prevalence of severe and high-impact chronic pain and reported more exposure to everyday discrimination compared to non-Hispanic White middle-aged and older adults. In fully adjusted models, exposure to everyday discrimination predicted higher odds to experience each type of chronic pain. In addition, study findings showed that exposure to everyday discrimination significantly raised pain risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White, but not non-Hispanic Black, middle-aged, and older adults. Findings underscore the influential role of everyday discrimination on the chronic pain experiences of middle-aged and older adults, as well as differential effects across racial/ethnic groups. PERSPECTIVE: Using national data, we examined associations between discrimination and chronic pain among middle-aged and older adults, including interactions between discrimination and race/ethnicity. Exposure to discrimination predicted a higher chronic pain burden, overall. Differential effects within racial/ethnic groups underscored a need for more nuanced investigations into pain disparities among this population.

Discrimination and Adverse Perinatal Health Outcomes: A Latent Class Analysis

INTRODUCTION

An intersectionality framework recognizes individuals as simultaneously inhabiting multiple intersecting social identities embedded within systems of disadvantage and privilege. Previous research links perceived discrimination with worsened health outcomes yet is limited by a focus on racial discrimination in isolation. We applied an intersectional approach to the study of discrimination to examine the association with adverse perinatal health outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a cohort of 2,286 pregnant participants (Black, n = 933; Hispanic, n = 471; White, n = 853; and Other, n = 29) from the Centering and Racial Disparities trial. Perceived discrimination was assessed via the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) and perinatal health outcomes collected via electronic medical record review. Latent class analysis was used to identify subgroups of discrimination based on EDS item response and the rate of adverse perinatal health outcomes compared between subgroups using a Bolck, Croon and Hagenaars 3-step approach.

RESULTS

Four discrimination subgroups were identified: no discrimination, general discrimination, discrimination attributed to one or several social identities, and discrimination attributed to most or all social identities. Experiencing general discrimination was associated with postpartum depression symptoms when compared with experiencing no discrimination among Black (9% vs 5%, P = .04) and White participants (18% vs 9%, P = .01). White participants experiencing general discrimination gave birth to low birthweight infants at a higher rate than those experiencing no discrimination (11% vs 6%, P = .04). No significant subgroup differences were observed among Hispanic participants.

CONCLUSION

Perceived discrimination may play an influential role in shaping perinatal health. More research applying an intersectional lens to the study of discrimination and perinatal health outcomes is needed.

Association between major discrimination and deficit accumulation in African American cancer survivors: The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors Study

BACKGROUND

Discrimination can adversely affect health and accelerate aging, but little is known about these relationships in cancer survivors. This study examines associations of discrimination and aging among self-identified African American survivors.

METHODS

A population-based sample of 2232 survivors 20-79 years old at diagnosis were enrolled within 5 years of breast (n = 787), colorectal (n = 227), lung (n = 223), or prostate (n = 995) cancer between 2017 and 2022. Surveys were completed post-active therapy. A deficit accumulation index measured aging-related disease and function (score range, 0-1, where <0.20 is robust, 0.20 to <0.35 is pre-frail, and 0.35+ is frail; 0.06 is a large clinically meaningful difference). The discrimination scale assessed ever experiencing major discrimination and seven types of events (score, 0-7). Linear regression tested the association of discrimination and deficit accumulation, controlling for age, time from diagnosis, cancer type, stage and therapy, and sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

Survivors were an average of 62 years old (SD, 9.6), 63.2% reported ever experiencing major discrimination, with an average of 2.4 (SD, 1.7) types of discrimination events. Only 24.4% had deficit accumulation scores considered robust (mean score, 0.30 [SD, 0.13]). Among those who reported ever experiencing major discrimination, survivors with four to seven types of discrimination events (vs. 0-1) had a large, clinically meaningful increase in adjusted deficits (0.062, p < .001) and this pattern was consistent across cancer types.

CONCLUSION

African American cancer survivors have high deficit accumulated index scores, and experiences of major discrimination were positively associated with these deficits. Future studies are needed to understand the intersectionality between aging, discrimination, and cancer survivorship among diverse populations.

Intersectional Approaches to Minority Aging Research

Purpose of Review

Growing racial/ethnic diversity among America's older adults necessitates additional research specifically focused on health and well-being among aging minoritized populations. Although Black and Latinx adults in the USA tend to face worse health outcomes as they age, substantial evidence points to unexpected health patterns (e.g., the race paradox in mental health, the Latino health paradox) that challenge our understanding of health and aging among these populations. In this review, we demonstrate the value of intersectionality theory for clarifying these health patterns and highlight the ways that intersectionality has been applied to minority aging research. To advance the field, we also make several recommendations for incorporating intersectional approaches in future scholarship on minority aging.

Recent Findings

Scholars have applied intersectional approaches to health and aging to unravel how social statuses and social conditions, such as race, ethnicity, gender, nativity, incarceration history, geographic region, and age, produce distinct shared experiences that shape health trajectories through multiple mechanisms.

Summary

We highlight common intersectional approaches used in minority aging research and underscore the value of this perspective for elucidating the complex, and often unexpected, health patterns of aging minoritized populations. We identify several key lessons and propose recommendations to advance scholarship on minority aging.