Complaints against nursing homes: comparing two sources of complaint information and predictors of complaints

Associations between Complaints and Organizational Characteristics among Ohio Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, Ohio nursing homes (NHs) have received an increasing number of complaints. The current study aims to gain a better understanding of the relationship between NH organizational characteristics and the number of complaints.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis was used.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Four data sources on Ohio NHs were merged. Ohio NH complaints data reported in 2018 and 2019 was linked with the 2017 Ohio Biennial Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities, 2017 Ohio Nursing Home Resident Satisfaction Survey, and 2018 Ohio Nursing Home Family Satisfaction Survey.

METHODS

Descriptive analysis, bivariate tests (ie, analysis of variance and χ2 test), and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Findings included that urban location, NH administrator (NHA) and director of nursing (DON) turnover in the previous 3 years, NH size, occupancy rate, certified nursing assistant (CNA) retention, and overall family satisfaction were significantly associated with total complaints. NHA and DON turnover, NH size, CNA retention, and overall family satisfaction were found to be significantly associated with substantiated complaints.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The importance of leadership (ie, NHA and DON) turnover, CNA retention, and family satisfaction indicates that specifically targeted efforts to improve in these areas can have a positive impact on NH quality.

The Importance of Zero-Deficiency Complaints in Nursing Homes: A Mere Consequence or Serious Concern?

Complaints represent an important metric for assessing the quality of nursing home (NH) care. Using the Automated Survey Processing Environment (ASPEN) Complaints/Incidents Tracking System dataset (2017), we examined the relationships between zero-deficiency complaints (ZDCs) and zero-deficiency substantiated complaints (ZDSCs) and the proportion of residents with dementia. NHs (N = 15,339) were separated into three groups-proportion of residents with dementia in the top, two middle, and the bottom quartiles. Negative binomial regressions assessed zero-deficiency complaint patterns in relation to NHs' proportion of residents with dementia, controlling for facility characteristics, staffing, and racial pattern. We reported average marginal effects (AMEs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). NHs in the top quartile yielded higher numbers of both ZDC (AME = .189, 95% CI: .102-.276, p < .001) and ZDSC (AME = .236, 95% CI: .094-.378, p = .001), than NHs in the bottom quartile. Results suggest a need for more uniform investigation processes and staff training to promote a more valid complaint process for residents with dementia.

Consumer Complaints in Nursing Homes: Analyzing Substantiated Single-Allegation Complaints to Deficiency Citations

Complaints provide important information to consumers about nursing homes (NHs), but how substantiated complaints map onto deficiency citations is unknown. The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between substantiated complaints and deficiency citations. Federally collected NH complaint and inspection records were obtained to identify all single allegation, substantiated complaints for NHs across the U.S. in 2017. Overall, the 369 complaint allegations in our sample resulted in a total of 585 deficiencies at the inspection stage; however, 35.2% of the allegations led to no deficiencies. Nearly two-thirds of the 369 substantiated single allegation complaints were categorized at the intake stage as quality of care (31.7%), resident abuse (17.3%), or resident neglect (14.1%). Further, 18% of the inspection deficiencies originated with complaint allegations that were prioritized as immediate jeopardy at intake, but of these, 71.4% were determined upon inspection to constitute "no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm." These results provide evidence that complaints have the potential to provide unique valuable information on NH quality of care and draw regulatory attention to consumers' concerns. Future studies should include qualitative research concerning complaint processes by conducting interviews/surveys of complainants, NH staff/administrators, long-term care ombudsmen, and state officials.

Trends in Nursing Home Complaints: Prevalence and Variation Across Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Regions

Resident complaints are vital to understanding nursing home (NH) quality. Using complaints as facility- and resident-level outcomes, this study replicates prior analyses (spanning 1998-2002 and 2007-2012) with 2013-2017 data, the phase prior to NH regulatory changes initiated in November, 2017. Advancing prior papers, we analyze the number of complaints, allegations, and deficiency citations separately. Between 2013-2017, 458,101 total complaints (5.9/NH/year) were identified, containing 949,466 allegations (12.2/NH/year), and resulting in the issuance of 156,135 deficiency citations (2.0/NH/year) in about 15,600 NHs across the country. Regarding the number of complaints, substantiated complaints, and deficiency citations, results show a steady increase compared to previous years. Furthermore, there are marked differences among the CMS survey regions on the prevalence of overall complaints, substantiated complaints, and deficiency citations. However, the average rate of substantiation of complaint allegations shows a decreasing trend over these years, suggesting that complaints may have increased due to higher care expectations.

Does Higher Worker Retention Buffer Against Consumer Complaints? Evidence From Ohio Nursing Homes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study examined the relationship between nursing home (NH) quality using consumer complaints and certified nursing assistant (CNA) annual retention rates among Ohio freestanding NHs (n = 691).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Core variables came from the 2017 Ohio Biennial Survey of Long-term Care Facilities and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Automated Survey Processing Environment Complaints/Incidents Tracking System. To compare NHs, 4 quartiles of CNA retention rates were created: low (0%-48%), medium (49%-60%), high (61%-72%), and very high retention (73%-100%). Negative binomial regressions were estimated on total, substantiated, and unsubstantiated allegations and complaints. All regressions controlled for facility and county-level factors and clustered facilities by county.

RESULTS

NHs in the top 50% (high and very high) of retention received 1.92 fewer allegations than those in the bottom 50%, representing a 19% difference; this trend was significant and negative across all outcomes. Using quartiles revealed a nonlinear pattern: high-retention NHs received the fewest number of allegations and complaints. The differences between high and low retention on allegations, substantiated, and unsubstantied allegations were 33% (3.73 fewer), 34% (0.51 fewer), and 32% (3.12 fewer), respectively. Unexpectedly, very high-retention NHs received more unsubstantiated allegations than high-retention NHs.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

While higher-retention should result in fewer complaints, our results indicate that some turnover may be desirable because the very high-retention NHs performed slightly worse than those with high retention. Among the remaining facilities, fewer complaints may be achieved by improving CNA retention through higher wages, career advancement, and better training.

Complaints Matter: Seriousness of Elder Mistreatment Citations in Nursing Homes Nationwide

Mistreatment of nursing home residents is prevalent and leads to harmful consequences. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services's (CMS) mission to protect residents' right to be free from mistreatment is implemented partially through state survey agencies' (SSAs) issuance of deficiency citations. The goal of this study was to compare SSA standard surveys and SSA complaint investigations with regard to the seriousness (scope and severity) of the mistreatment citations issued. A cumulative link mixed model was built to estimate the differences between standard surveys and complaint investigations in the seriousness of four core and two secondary mistreatment citations nationwide from 2014 to 2017. In all of the six mistreatment deficiency citations, complaint investigations were more likely to be determined as more serious compared with standard surveys. The findings reinforce the importance of strengthening nursing homes' and CMS/SSA response to consumers' concerns and grievances before they escalate into more harmful mistreatment.

Perceived Patient Safety Culture in Nursing Homes Associated With "Nursing Home Compare" Performance Indicators

BACKGROUND

The safety and quality of care provided to nursing home residents is a significant concern. Little is known whether fostering patient safety culture helps improve the safety and quality of nursing home care.

METHODS

This study determined the associations of nursing home patient safety culture performance, as reported by administrators, directors of nursing, and unit leaders in a large national sample of free-standing nursing homes, with several "Nursing Home Compare" performance indicators. We conducted the survey in 2017 using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Survey on Patient Safety Culture for nursing homes to collect data on 12 core domains of safety culture scores. Survey data were linked to other nursing home files for multivariable regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 818 of the 2254 sampled nursing homes had at least 1 completed survey returned for a response rate of 36%. After adjustment for nursing home, market, and state covariates, every 10 percentage points increase in overall positive response rate for safety culture was associated with 0.56 fewer health care deficiencies (P=0.001), 0.74 fewer substantiated complaints (P=0.004), reduced fines by $2285.20 (P=0.059), and 20% increased odds of being designated as 4-star or 5-star (vs. 1 to 3 star) facilities (odds ratio roughly=1.20, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to improve nursing home performance in patient safety culture have the potential to improve broad safety and quality of care measures encapsulated in the Nursing Home Compare publication.

Analyses of Complaints, Investigations of Allegations, and Deficiency Citations in United States Nursing Homes

Quality of care in nursing homes has been evaluated from varying perspectives, but few studies analyze complaints made to surveyors. This study analyzed complaints, investigations, and citations for nursing homes nationwide. Using the complaint and survey data sets, analyses match nursing home complaints with findings of investigations conducted. Results showed the average complaint rate was 13.3 complaints per 100 residents and that 43.2% of complaint allegations were substantiated, with complaints about care and services provided being the most prevalent. Variability was noted among the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regions and, on average, 47.5% of facilities had five or more complaints in a given year. While additional research could evaluate the effect of complaint investigations on nursing home quality, results indicated that complaints and subsequent investigations provide further information regarding quality for residents. Results also suggest improvements in the training for surveyors and more consistency across Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services survey regions.

Association between traditional nursing home quality measures and two sources of nursing home complaints

OBJECTIVE

To test for an association between traditional nursing home quality measures and two sources of resident- and caregiver-derived nursing home complaints.

DATA SOURCES

Nursing home complaints to the North Carolina Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program and state certification agency from October 2002 through September 2006 were matched with Online Survey Certification and Reporting data and Minimum Data Set Quality Indicators (MDS-QIs).

STUDY DESIGN

We examine the association between the number of complaints filed against a facility and measures of inspection violations, staffing levels, and MDS-QIs.

DATA EXTRACTION

One observation per facility per quarter is constructed by matching quarterly data on complaints to OSCAR data from the same or most recent prior quarter and to MDS-QIs from the same quarter. One observation per inspection is obtained by matching OSCAR data to complaint totals from both the same and the immediate prior quarter.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

There is little relationship between MDS-QIs and complaints. Ombudsman complaints and inspection violations are generally unrelated, but there is a positive relationship between state certification agency complaints and inspection violations.

CONCLUSIONS

Ombudsman and state certification agency complaint data are resident- and caregiver-derived quality measures that are distinctive from and complement traditional quality measures.