1
|
Straneo M, Beňová L, van den Akker T, Abeid MS, Ayebare E, Dossou JP, Handing G, Kandeya B, Pembe AB, Hanson C. Mixed vulnerabilities: the biological risk of high parity is aggravated by emergency referral in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. Int J Equity Health 2025; 24:19. [PMID: 39833887 PMCID: PMC11744807 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02379-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Identification of interacting vulnerabilities is essential to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). High parity (≥ 5 previous births) is an underemphasized biological vulnerability linked to poverty and affecting a sizeable proportion of SSA births. Despite increased risk, high parity women rarely use hospitals for childbirth. We assessed whether emergency referral during childbirth was associated with adverse events in high parity women in hospitals in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. We used e-registry data collected in 16 hospitals included in the Action Leveraging Evidence to Reduce perinatal morbidity and morTality (ALERT) trial. Main outcomes were severe maternal outcomes and in-facility peripartum death (fresh stillbirth or very early neonatal death). Main exposure was parity; emergency (in-labour) referral was included as effect modifier with potential confounders. We used multivariable logistic regression including parity/referral interaction and post-regression margins analysis. Among 80,663 births, 4,742 (5.9%) were to high parity women. One third reached hospital following emergency referral. Severe maternal outcomes and peripartum mortality were over 2.5-fold higher in high parity women with emergency referral compared to the lowest risk group. To avert these adverse events, emergency referral must be avoided by ensuring high parity women give birth in hospitals. Trial registration Pan African Clinical Trial Registry ( www.pactr.org ): PACTR202006793783148. Registered on 17th June 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Straneo
- Health Systems and Policy Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Athena Institute, Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Lenka Beňová
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Thomas van den Akker
- Athena Institute, Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Muzdalifat S Abeid
- Medical College East Africa, Aga Khan University, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Elizabeth Ayebare
- Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Jean-Paul Dossou
- Centre de Recherche en Reproduction Humaine Et en Démographie (CERRHUD), Cotonou, Benin
| | - Greta Handing
- Department of Student Affairs, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bianca Kandeya
- Center for Reproductive Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Private Bag 360, Chichiri BT3, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Andrea B Pembe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Health Systems and Policy Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Straneo M, Hanson C, van den Akker T, Afolabi BB, Asefa A, Delamou A, Dennis M, Gadama L, Mahachi N, Mlilo W, Pembe AB, Tsuala Fouogue J, Beňová L. Inequalities in use of hospitals for childbirth among rural women in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparative analysis of 18 countries using Demographic and Health Survey data. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e013029. [PMID: 38262683 PMCID: PMC10806834 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rising facility births in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) mask inequalities in higher-level emergency care-typically in hospitals. Limited research has addressed hospital use in women at risk of or with complications, such as high parity, linked to poverty and rurality, for whom hospital care is essential. We aimed to address this gap, by comparatively assessing hospital use in rural SSA by wealth and parity. METHODS Countries in SSA with a Demographic and Health Survey since 2015 were included. We assessed rural hospital childbirth stratifying by wealth (wealthier/poorer) and parity (nulliparity/high parity≥5), and their combination. We computed percentages, 95% CIs and percentage-point differences, by stratifier level. To compare hospital use across countries, we produced a composite index, including six utilisation and equality indicators. RESULTS This cross-sectional study included 18 countries. In all, a minority of rural women used hospitals for childbirth (2%-29%). There were disparities by wealth and parity, and poorer, high-parity women used hospitals least. The poorer/wealthier difference in utilisation among high-parity women ranged between 1.3% (Mali) and 13.2% (Rwanda). We found use and equality of hospitals in rural settings were greater in Malawi and Liberia, followed by Zimbabwe, the Gambia and Rwanda. DISCUSSION Inequalities identified across 18 countries in rural SSA indicate poor, higher-risk women of high parity had lower use of hospitals for childbirth. Specific policy attention is urgently needed for this group where disadvantage accumulates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Straneo
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre for Excellence for Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, LSHTM, London, UK
| | - Thomas van den Akker
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bosede B Afolabi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Anteneh Asefa
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Delamou
- Africa Center for Excellence (CEA-PMCT), Universite Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry, Conakry, Guinea
- Maferinyah Training and Research Center, Forécariah, Guinea
| | | | - Luis Gadama
- Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Southern Region, Malawi
| | - Nyika Mahachi
- Zimbabwe College of Public Health Physicians, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Welcome Mlilo
- Matabeleland North Provincial Medical Directorate, Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Care, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
| | - Andrea B Pembe
- Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Jovanny Tsuala Fouogue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Maternal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Université de Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
| | - Lenka Beňová
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, LSHTM, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shabani J, Masanja H, Kagoye S, Minja J, Bajaria S, Mlacha Y, Msuya S, Masoud M, Simba D, Pembe AB, Makuwani AM, Ismail H, Chacha M, Kumalija C, Boerma T, Hanson C. Quality of reporting and trends of emergency obstetric and neonatal care indicators: an analysis from Tanzania district health information system data between 2016 and 2020. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:716. [PMID: 37805475 PMCID: PMC10559477 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06028-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine health facility data provides the opportunity to monitor progress in quality and uptake of health care continuously. Our study aimed to assess the reliability and usefulness of emergency obstetric care data including temporal and regional variations over the past five years in Tanzania Mainland. METHODS Data were compiled from the routine monthly district reports compiled as part of the health management information systems for 2016-2020. Key indicators for maternal and neonatal care coverage, emergency obstetric and neonatal complications, and interventions indicators were computed. Assessment on reliability and consistency of reports was conducted and compared with annual rates and proportions over time, across the 26 regions in of Tanzania Mainland and by institutional delivery coverage. RESULTS Facility reporting was near complete with 98% in 2018-2020. Estimated population coverage of institutional births increased by 10% points from 71.2% to 2016 to 81.7% in 2020 in Tanzania Mainland, driven by increased use of dispensaries and health centres compared to hospitals. This trend was more pronounced in regions with lower institutional birth rates. The Caesarean section rate remained stable at around 10% of institutional births. Trends in the occurrence of complications such as antepartum haemorrhage, premature rupture of membranes, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia or post-partum bleeding were consistent over time but at low levels (1% of institutional births). Prophylactic uterotonics were provided to nearly all births while curative uterotonics were reported to be used in less than 10% of post-partum bleeding and retained placenta cases. CONCLUSION Our results show a mixed picture in terms of usefulness of the District Health Information System(DHIS2) data. Key indicators of institutional delivery and Caesarean section rates were plausible and provide useful information on regional disparities and trends. However, obstetric complications and several interventions were underreported thus diminishing the usefulness of these data for monitoring. Further research is needed on why complications and interventions to address them are not documented reliably.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sophia Kagoye
- National Institute for Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | | | | | | | - Sia Msuya
- Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College, Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
| | | | - Daudi Simba
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Andrea B Pembe
- Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Claudia Hanson
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Straneo M, Beňová L, van den Akker T, Pembe AB, Smekens T, Hanson C. No increase in use of hospitals for childbirth in Tanzania over 25 years: Accumulation of inequity among poor, rural, high parity women. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0000345. [PMID: 36962703 PMCID: PMC10021586 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Improving childbirth care in rural settings in sub-Saharan Africa is essential to attain the commitment expressed in the Sustainable Development Goals to leave no one behind. In Tanzania, the period between 1991 and 2016 was characterized by health system expansion prioritizing primary health care and a rise in rural facility births from 45% to 54%. Facilities however are not all the same, with advanced management of childbirth complications generally only available in hospitals and routine childbirth care in primary facilities. We hypothesized that inequity in the use of hospital-based childbirth may have increased over this period, and that it may have particularly affected high parity (≥5) women. We analysed records of 16,080 women from five Tanzanian Demographic and Health Surveys (1996, 1999, 2004, 2010, 2015/6), using location of the most recent birth as outcome (home, primary health care facility or hospital), wealth and parity as exposure variables and demographic and obstetric characteristics as potential confounders. A multinomial logistic regression model with wealth/parity interaction was run and post-estimation margins analysis produced percentages of births for various combinations of wealth and parity for each survey. We found no reduction in inequity in this 25-year period. Among poorest women, lowest use of hospital-based childbirth (around 10%) was at high parity, with no change over time. In women having their first baby, hospital use increased over time but with a widening pro-rich gap (poorest women predicted use increased from 36 to 52% and richest from 40 to 59%). We found that poor rural women of high parity were a vulnerable group requiring specifically targeted interventions to ensure they receive effective childbirth care. To leave no one behind, it is essential to look beyond the average coverage of facility births, as such a limited focus masks different patterns and time trends among marginalised groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Straneo
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lenka Beňová
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas van den Akker
- Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea B Pembe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Tom Smekens
- Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Claudia Hanson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- London School of Hygiene &Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grovogui FM, Benova L, Manet H, Sidibe S, Dioubate N, Camara BS, Beavogui AH, Delamou A. Determinants of facility-based childbirth among adolescents and young women in Guinea: A secondary analysis of the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0000435. [PMID: 36962523 PMCID: PMC10021764 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Maternal mortality remains very high in Sub-Saharan African countries and the risk is higher among adolescent girls. Maternal mortality occurs in these settings mainly around the time of childbirth and the first 24 hours after birth. Therefore, skilled attendance in an enabling environment is essential to reduce the occurrence of adverse outcomes for both women and their children. This study aims to analyze the determinants of facility childbirth among adolescents and young women in Guinea. METHODS We used the Guinea Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted in 2018. All females who were adolescents (15-19) or young women (20-24 years) at the time of their most recent live birth in the five years before the survey were included. We examined the use of health facilities for childbirth and its determinants selected through the Andersen health-seeking model using descriptive analysis and multilevel multivariable logistic regression. All descriptive and analytical estimated were produced by adjusting for the survey sampling using the svy option, including adjustment for clustering, stratification and unequal probability of selection and non-response (individual sample weights). The subpopulation option was also used to account for the variance of estimations. RESULTS Overall, 58% of adolescents and 57% of young women gave birth in a health facility. Young women were more likely to have used private sector facilities compared to adolescents (p<0.001). Factors significantly associated with a facility birth in multivariable regression included: secondary or higher educational level (aOR = 1.86; 95%CI:1.24-2.78) compared to no formal education; receipt of 1-3 antenatal visits (aOR = 9.33; 95%CI: 5.07-17.16) and 4+ visits (aOR = 16.67; 95%CI: 8.82-31.48) compared to none; living in urban (aOR = 2.50; 95%CI: 1.57-3,98) compared to rural areas. Women from poorest households had lower odds of facility-based childbirth. There was substantial variation in the likelihood of birth in a health facility by region, with highest odds in N'Zérékoré and lowest in Labé. CONCLUSION The percentage of births in health facilities among adolescents and young women in Guinea was 58%. This remains suboptimal regarding the challenges associated maternal mortality and morbidity issues in Guinea. Socio-economic characteristics, region of residence and antenatal care use were the main determinants of its use. Efforts to improve maternal health among this group should target care discontinuation between antenatal care and childbirth (primarily by removing financial barriers) and increasing the demand for facility-based childbirth services in communities, while paying attention to the quality and respectful nature of healthcare services provided there.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fassou Mathias Grovogui
- Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea
- Centre d'Excellence d'Afrique pour la Prévention et le Contrôle des Maladies Transmissibles (CEA-PCMT), Guinea
| | - Lenka Benova
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hawa Manet
- Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea
| | - Sidikiba Sidibe
- Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea
- Centre d'Excellence d'Afrique pour la Prévention et le Contrôle des Maladies Transmissibles (CEA-PCMT), Guinea
- University Gamal Abdel Nasser, Conakry, Guinea
| | - Nafissatou Dioubate
- Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea
| | - Bienvenu Salim Camara
- Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea
- Centre d'Excellence d'Afrique pour la Prévention et le Contrôle des Maladies Transmissibles (CEA-PCMT), Guinea
| | - Abdoul Habib Beavogui
- Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea
- University Gamal Abdel Nasser, Conakry, Guinea
| | - Alexandre Delamou
- Centre National de Formation et de Recherche en Santé Rurale de Mafèrinyah, Forécariah, Guinea
- Centre d'Excellence d'Afrique pour la Prévention et le Contrôle des Maladies Transmissibles (CEA-PCMT), Guinea
- University Gamal Abdel Nasser, Conakry, Guinea
| |
Collapse
|