Issues in health promotion

A healthy settings approach to addressing painogenic environments: New perspectives from health promotion

Structural approaches to promoting health focus on policies and practices affecting health at the community level and concentrate on systems and forces of society, including distribution of power, that foster disadvantage and diminish health and well-being. In this paper we advocate consideration of structural approaches to explore macro level influences on the burden of persistent pain on society. We argue that health promotion is an appropriate discipline to ameliorate painogenic environments and that a “settings approach” offers a crucial vehicle to do this. We encourage consideration of socio-ecological frameworks to explore factors affecting human development at individual, interpersonal, organizational, societal, and environmental levels because persistent pain is multifaceted and complex and unlikely to be understood from a single level of analysis. We acknowledge criticisms that the structural approach may appear unachievable due to its heavy reliance on inter-sectoral collaboration. We argue that a settings approach may offer solutions because it straddles “practical” and cross-sectorial forces impacting on the health of people. A healthy settings approach invests in social systems where health is not the primary remit and utilises synergistic action between settings to promote greater health gains. We offer the example of obesogenic environments being a useful concept to develop strategies to tackle childhood obesity in school-settings, community-settings, shops, and sports clubs; and that this settings approach has been more effective than one organisation tackling the issue in isolation. We argue that a settings approach should prove useful for understanding painogenic environments and tackling the burden of persistent pain.

The relation between the social and the biological and COVID-19

Social factors have been linked to disease severity and mortality in COVID-19. These social factors are ethnicity, social disadvantage, age, gender and occupation. Pre-existing medical conditions have also been identified as an increasing risk. This paper explores the relationship between these social and biological factors using a syndemic frame of reference. The paper argues that although the associations have been very well documented, the mechanisms linking the social factors and disease outcomes are not well understood. An approach that seeks to find commensurability between the social and the biological, is suggested.

Clinicians' and Seniors' Views of Reference- Based Pricing: Two Sides of a Coin

The government of British Columbia instituted a reference-based pricing (RBP) policy on pharmaceutical drugs to limit reimbursement costs. Only less expensive and therapeutically effective drugs and not "Cadillac" versions of chemically similar drugs would be reimbursed. The effect of the imminent implementation of this policy on seniors and clinicians (physicians, pharmacists, and various medical specialists) was explored through focus groups. Although the topic was RBP, the overwhelming majority of responses were concerned with various aspects of physician-patient interactions. Most seniors supported the RBP initiative and viewed excessive profits for pharmaceutical corporations as wasteful. Many seniors wished to be more involved in deciding treatment possibilities and to be better informed. In contrast, the clinicians viewed the policy as interference and a restriction of their authority, preferring a more collaborative educative approach to changes in drug prescribing Implications of these divergent views are discussed.

Missed opportunities? Locating health promotion within multidisciplinary public health

This paper examines the complex interconnections between the development of health promotion and multidisciplinary public health, respectively. Health promotion takes a distinctive interdisciplinary and multiprofessional perspective on health. Historically, it has brought together practitioners from varied disciplinary backgrounds, education and training. It therefore brings real advantages to the public health enterprise, where the goal is to bridge organisations, professions and partners to collectively address key determinants of health in the most effective manner. This paper debates the contribution health promotion has made to the development of multidisciplinary public health over the past 30 years and explores the principles, values, professional bases and practices of both. It is argued that health promotion's contribution to the development of 'the new public health' was critical, while its status and role within multidisciplinary public health remain problematic and unresolved. The nature of these dilemmas is discussed, reflecting on missed opportunities and possible resolutions.

Community representatives: representing the "community"?

This paper takes as its starting point the apparent disjunction between the assumptions of the self-evidence of the meaning of community in major international declarations and strategies which promote community participation and the observation that meanings of "community" are a subject of extensive debate in literatures of social analysis and to some extent health. Given that the word's meaning is not agreed, those working to promote "community participation" in health are forced to adjudicate on competing meanings in order to operationalise the notion. This raises questions about how this is done and what are the implications of particular choices for what may be achieved by the participating "community". This paper presents the findings of an empirical study which examined the manner in which ideas of "community" are operationalised by people engaged in encouraging community participation in health promotion in the context of the selection of members for health for all steering groups in healthy cities projects in the United Kingdom. It argues that the demands of the role of the "community representative" are such that particular interpretations of "community" achieve ascendance. The paper explores the consequences of the interpretation of "community" as part of the "voluntary sector" and argues that this may compromise one of the stated desired outcomes of community participation i.e. extending democracy in health decision-making.

The four levels of health promotion: an integrated approach

Four levels of health promotion are identified: environmental, social, organisational and individual. It is argued that health promotion interventions should not be confined to one level but instead an integrated approach should be adopted, in which the relationships between the four levels and the outcomes at all levels ought to be considered and analysed. It is suggested that these four levels are used as a checklist when health promotion interventions are planned.

The marketing of empowerment and the construction of the health consumer: a critique of health promotion

Health promotion claims to be empowering. However, this claim is not without major problematic contradictions and inconsistencies. The way in which health promotion is also controlling is identified in this article. To understand why the discourse of health promotion is traversed by this empowering/controlling contradiction, the discourse is critically analyzed, revealing a parallel with the structure of the discourse of marketing. Health promotion, rather than fulfilling its promise of empowerment, effectively constructs the individual subject as a "health consumer" in accordance with the model of consumer capitalism.

Preventive work with families: issues facing public health nurses

This paper examines the issues that nurses experience when entering the family system to work preventively. The theoretical basis of family-centered nursing is analysed and the need for empirical work is identified in order to develop a knowledge base for this practice. Some unique characteristics of the public health nursing role are discussed with emphasis on territorial issues, power relationships and accountability problems. The need for public health nurses to function as advanced generalists across different system levels is recommended and family skills necessary for effective family nursing are examined. The authors identify the unique role of public health nurses because they have access to healthy families and families dealing with early stages of health concerns. The authors support the general structure of public health practice as of value for preventive work with families. However, clarity regarding referrals, contracting and the rights of clients is called for to facilitate collaborative family-centred nursing.