1
|
Muchangi JM, Mturi J, Mukasa H, Kithuki K, Kosgei SJ, Kanyangi LM, Moraro R, Nankanja M. Enablers and barriers to vaccine uptake and handwashing practices to prevent and control COVID-19 in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania: a systematic review. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1352787. [PMID: 38601496 PMCID: PMC11004251 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The global emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) posed unprecedented challenges, jeopardizing decades of progress in healthcare systems, education, and poverty eradication. While proven interventions such as handwashing and mass vaccination offer effective means of curbing COVID-19 spread, their uptake remains low, potentially undermining future pandemic control efforts. This systematic review synthesized available evidence of the factors influencing vaccine uptake and handwashing practices in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania in the context of COVID-19 prevention and control. We conducted an extensive literature search across PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Out of 391 reviewed articles, 18 were eligible for inclusion. Some of the common barriers to handwashing in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania included lack of trust in the government's recommendations or messaging on the benefits of hand hygiene and lack of access to water, while some of the barriers to vaccine uptake included vaccine safety and efficacy concerns and inadequate awareness of vaccination sites and vaccine types. Enablers of handwashing practices encompassed hand hygiene programs and access to soap and water while those of COVID-19 vaccine uptake included improved access to vaccine knowledge and, socio-economic factors like a higher level of education. This review underscores the pivotal role of addressing these barriers while capitalizing on enablers to promote vaccination and handwashing practices. Stakeholders should employ awareness campaigns and community engagement, ensure vaccine and hygiene resources' accessibility, and leverage socio-economic incentives for effective COVID-19 prevention and control. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [CRD42023396303].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Mturi
- Amref Health Africa, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rukchart N, Hnuploy K, Eltaybani S, Sonlom K, Chutipattana N, Le CN, Patthanasak Khammaneechan, Jongjit W, Supaviboolas S. Prevalence and determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among vulnerable populations in Thailand: An application of the health belief model. Heliyon 2024; 10:e26043. [PMID: 38384553 PMCID: PMC10878938 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Assessing the acceptance of vaccinations among vulnerable populations is essential to ensure proper coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) control. This study used the Health Belief Model to examine the intention to vaccinate against COVID-19 among vulnerable populations in Thailand. Methods This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in Thailand between October and November 2021. Using multistage random sampling, 945 individuals from vulnerable populations (i.e., older adults, pregnant women, market or street vendors, and individuals with chronic diseases) were selected and invited to complete a self-reported questionnaire. The questionnaire assessed participants' socioeconomic characteristics, COVID-19 preventive measures, knowledge, preventative health beliefs, and vaccine intention. A generalized linear mixed model was used to identify factors associated with the intention to receive the vaccine. Results The prevalence of intent to accept the COVID-19 vaccine was 75.03% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.16-77.68). The Health Belief Model factors associated with vaccine acceptance were cue to action (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.13; 95% CI: 2.07-4.71), perceived benefits (AOR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.38-3.01), and perceived severity (AOR = 1.77; 95% CI: 1.18-2.65). Significant other covariates were wearing a face mask in the previous month (AOR = 2.62; 95% CI: 1.59-4.31), being 1-2 m away from other people (AOR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.24), trust in government (AOR = 1.44; 95% CI: 1.03-2.02). Additionally, women were more likely to accept the COVID-19 vaccine compared to men (AOR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.02-2.01). Conclusions Approximately one quarter of vulnerable individuals do not intend to be vaccinated. Health Belief Models can explain vaccine acceptance, and aid the Ministry of Public Health in planning future efforts to increase vaccine uptake. Healthcare professionals' advice, village health volunteers' information, and partnership collaborations are critical. Facilitating mobile community units, launching educational campaigns, maintaining a distance of 1-2 m from others, and wearing masks may increase COVID-19 vaccine acceptability. This research can help prepare for future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navarat Rukchart
- School of Nursing, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
| | - Kanit Hnuploy
- Suratthani Rajabhat University, Suratthani, 84100, Thailand
| | - Sameh Eltaybani
- Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | | | - Nirachon Chutipattana
- Department of Community Public Health, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
- Excellent Centre for Dengue and Community Public Health (E.C. for DACH), School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
| | - Cua Ngoc Le
- Department of Community Public Health, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
- Excellent Centre for Dengue and Community Public Health (E.C. for DACH), School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
| | - Patthanasak Khammaneechan
- Department of Community Public Health, School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
- Excellent Centre for Dengue and Community Public Health (E.C. for DACH), School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
| | - Wajinee Jongjit
- Department of Public Health Strategy Development, Nakhon Si Thammarat Provincial Public Health Office, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80000, Thailand
| | - Suttakarn Supaviboolas
- Southern Border Regional Center for Primary Health Care Development, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80000, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Towett G, Snead RS, Grigoryan K, Marczika J. Geographical and practical challenges in the implementation of digital health passports for cross-border COVID-19 pandemic management: a narrative review and framework for solutions. Global Health 2023; 19:98. [PMID: 38066568 PMCID: PMC10709942 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00998-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid global spread of infectious diseases, epitomized by the recent COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted the critical need for effective cross-border pandemic management strategies. Digital health passports (DHPs), which securely store and facilitate the sharing of critical health information, including vaccination records and test results, have emerged as a promising solution to enable safe travel and access to essential services and economic activities during pandemics. However, the implementation of DHPs faces several significant challenges, both related to geographical disparities and practical considerations, necessitating a comprehensive approach for successful global adoption. In this narrative review article, we identify and elaborate on the critical geographical and practical barriers that hinder global adoption and the effective utilization of DHPs. Geographical barriers are complex, encompassing disparities in vaccine access, regulatory inconsistencies, differences across countries in data security and users' privacy policies, challenges related to interoperability and standardization, and inadequacies in technological infrastructure and limited access to digital technologies. Practical challenges include the possibility of vaccine contraindications and breakthrough infections, uncertainties surrounding natural immunity, and limitations of standard tests in assessing infection risk. To address geographical disparities and enhance the functionality and interoperability of DHPs, we propose a framework that emphasizes international collaboration to achieve equitable access to vaccines and testing resources. Furthermore, we recommend international cooperation to establish unified vaccine regulatory frameworks, adopting globally accepted standards for data privacy and protection, implementing interoperability protocols, and taking steps to bridge the digital divide. Addressing practical challenges requires a meticulous approach to assessing individual risk and augmenting DHP implementation with rigorous health screenings and personal infection prevention measures. Collectively, these initiatives contribute to the development of robust and inclusive cross-border pandemic management strategies, ultimately promoting a safer and more interconnected global community in the face of current and future pandemics.
Collapse
|