1
|
Dias T, MacKay D, Canuto K, Boyle JA, D’Antoine H, Hampton D, Martin K, Phillips J, Bartlett N, Mcintyre HD, Graham S, Corpus S, Connors C, McCarthy L, Kirkham R, Maple-Brown LJ. Supporting healthy lifestyles for First Nations women and communities through co-design: lessons and early findings from remote Northern Australia. FRONTIERS IN CLINICAL DIABETES AND HEALTHCARE 2024; 5:1356060. [PMID: 38863516 PMCID: PMC11165116 DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1356060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Background The period before, during, and after pregnancy presents an opportunity to reduce diabetes-related risks, which in Australia disproportionately impact Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women. Collaboration with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women/communities is essential to ensure acceptability and sustainability of lifestyle modifications. Using a novel co-design approach, we aimed to identify shared priorities and potential lifestyle strategies. We also reflected on learnings from this approach. Methods We conducted 11 workshops and 8 interviews at two sites in Australia's Northern Territory (Central Australia and Top End), using experience-based co-design (EBCD) and incorporating principles of First Nations participatory research. Workshops/interviews explored participant' experiences and understanding of diabetes in pregnancy, contextual issues, and potential lifestyle strategies. Participants included three groups: 1) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women of reproductive age (defined as aged 16-45 years); 2) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community members; and 3) health/community services professionals. The study methodology sought to amplify the voices of Aboriginal women. Findings Participants included 23 women between ages 16-45 years (9 with known lived experience of diabetes in pregnancy), 5 community members and 23 health professionals. Key findings related to identified priority issues, strategies to address priorities, and reflections on use of EBCD methodology. Priorities were largely consistent across study regions: access to healthy foods and physical activity; connection to traditional practices and culture; communication regarding diabetes and related risks; and the difficulty for women of prioritising their health among competing priorities. Strategies included implementation of a holistic women's program in Central Australia, while Top End participants expressed the desire to improve nutrition, peer support and community awareness of diabetes. EBCD provided a useful structure to explore participants' experiences and collectively determine priorities, while allowing for modifications to ensure co-design methods were contextually appropriate. Challenges included the resource-intensive nature of stakeholder engagement, and collaborating effectively with services and communities when researchers were "outsiders". Conclusions A hybrid methodology using EBCD and First Nations participatory research principles enabled collaboration between Aboriginal women, communities and health services to identify shared priorities and solutions to reduce diabetes-related health risks. Genuine co-design processes support self-determination and enhance acceptability and sustainability of health strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Dias
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Diana MacKay
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Karla Canuto
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacqueline A. Boyle
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Heather D’Antoine
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Denella Hampton
- Central Australian Aboriginal Congress, Alice Springs, NT, Australia
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group, Diabetes Across the Lifecourse: Northern Australia Partnership, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Kim Martin
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Jessica Phillips
- Women’s Cultural Hub, Mala’la Community Wellness Centre, Mala’la Aboriginal Health Corporation, Maningrida, NT, Australia
| | - Norlisha Bartlett
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - H. David Mcintyre
- Mater Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sian Graham
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group, Diabetes Across the Lifecourse: Northern Australia Partnership, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Sumaria Corpus
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Advisory Group, Diabetes Across the Lifecourse: Northern Australia Partnership, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Northern Territory Department of Health, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | | | - Leisa McCarthy
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Anyinginyi Health Aboriginal Corporation, Tennant Creek, NT, Australia
| | - Renae Kirkham
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
| | - Louise J. Maple-Brown
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, NT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kleinschmitt A. Research on psychotherapy for refugees in Germany: A systematic review on its transdisciplinary and transregional opening. Transcult Psychiatry 2024; 61:151-167. [PMID: 38234182 PMCID: PMC10996299 DOI: 10.1177/13634615231187255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Recently, an increasing amount of research has focused on adapting psychotherapy concepts for refugees moving to Germany. For a long time, research from disciplines like anthropology and cultural studies has problematized the eurocentrism of psychology's theoretical premises and methodologies. Currently, scholarship around Global Mental Health and decolonization emphasizes how knowledge production from various disciplines and regions relates to this topic and could contribute to improving respective approaches. Consequently, this review aims at evaluating the actual transdisciplinary and transregional opening of studies on psychotherapeutic interventions for refugees in Germany. It provides a theoretically as well as empirically informed basis for looking at disciplinary premises, practices, and boundaries as well as the regional locatedness of respective research. Fourteen relevant studies, published between January 1, 2007 and March 4, 2022, were identified by systematically searching the databases PubPsych and Web of Science. The studies were reviewed regarding study design, choice and characterization of target groups, regional origin and target group specific adaptations of the therapeutic concepts, integration of elements from and connections to other disciplines, and use of references to scholarship from the Global South. The findings show a pronounced focus on the development of trauma therapy approaches and moreover a broad variety of concept adaptations in response to the assumed characteristics, situations, and needs of the target groups. While the findings reveal a complex transregional pattern of development and adaptation of the therapeutic concepts, transdisciplinary opening and reference to the Global South appear scarce.
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen K, Lou VWQ. Lessons Learned From a Knowledge-Matching Participatory Research Approach Involving Law Students and Older Adults as Peer Researchers. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2023; 33:956-968. [PMID: 37493970 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231186102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
The popularity of engaging community members as peer researchers is growing. The existing participatory research involving older adults appears to suffer from two main issues. First, older adults are rarely positioned as equitable research partners. Second, a paradox may exist between capacity building and an authentic lay perspective of older adults. This article adopted a knowledge-matching participatory approach to address these two issues. Seven older adults and four law students were trained as peer researchers to work with two academic researchers on a project about financial well-being in retirement. This article documented the research process and reflected the benefits, challenges, and best practices associated with this approach by analyzing transcripts from three reflective meetings, written reflections, and field notes from all peer and academic researchers using a thematic analysis approach. Results outline the experiences and reflections of using knowledge-matching participatory research for academic researchers and peer researchers, as well as for research processes and outcomes. The advantages of extending methodological amplitude, leveraging older adults' capacity, partnership matching, and empowerment are shown by the knowledge-matching participatory methodology. The establishment of capacity building, partnership development, and agenda flexibility are essential elements of success. We further discussed power disparity, partnership conflicts, and ethical dilemmas. Researchers and practitioners can utilize the findings, methodological approaches, and lessons learned in their studies aiming at engaging older adults in improving health and social well-being in later life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Chen
- Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Vivian Wei-Qun Lou
- Sau Po Centre on Ageing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Social Work and Social Administration, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brear MR, Shabangu PN, Hammarberg K, Fisher J. Ethical tensions surrounding 'third-party disclosure' by participants: Lessons from participatory health research in Eswatini. Glob Public Health 2022; 17:2617-2629. [PMID: 34569431 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1983000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Third-party disclosure by participants is inherent to much global health research. It presents ethical tensions with respecting the autonomy and privacy of non-consenting individuals whose data are disclosed but is neglected in ethics guidelines. Our aim was to describe and ethically reflect on, third party disclosure in a community-participatory demographic and health survey (DHS) implemented within participatory health research (PHR) about community-based care of children affected by AIDS in Eswatini. We collected DHS data and analysed it statistically. We studied the PHR process and outcomes ethnographically and analysed the data interpretively, using theories that conceptualise secrecy as relational and power-laden. We found that third parties' data were disclosed by DHS respondents (typically women), including data about health conditions, abuse perpetration and being a caregiving burden. Ethnographic findings suggested that some third parties may not have consented to us collecting their data. However, respecting third parties' autonomy and privacy presents ethical tensions related to silencing survey respondents and impairing knowledge creation. To minimise the ethical tensions surrounding third-party disclosure researchers can analyse risks, benefits and power dynamics and extend their ethical responsibilities to protect participants to also protect non-participants, and from data collection to also include reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Brear
- Faculty of Medicine, Global and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Faculty of Humanities, Anthropology and Development Studies, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | - Karin Hammarberg
- Faculty of Medicine, Global and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Fisher
- Faculty of Medicine, Global and Women's Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cardon G, Chastin S, Van Stappen V, Huys N, Stefanova T, Chakarova N, Kivelä J, Alberto Moreno L, Sándor Istvánné R, Androutsos O, Manios Y, De Craemer M. The Feel4Diabetes intervention: effectiveness on 24-hour physical behaviour composition in families at risk for diabetes development. Health Promot Int 2022; 37:6775000. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Summary
The Feel4Diabetes project conducted a 2-year intervention aiming to encourage healthy behaviours in families in six European countries. Within this paper, the intervention effect was evaluated after the first intervention year on 24-hour physical behaviour composition in Belgian families at risk for type 2 diabetes. Parents’ and children’s levels of physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) were objectively measured and sleep duration was self-reported. Valid data were obtained in 82 children (mean age: 8.2 ± 0.84; 50.0% boys) and 72 parents (mean age: 40.1 ± 5.5; 27.8% fathers). Data were analysed using a compositional data approach, and mixed models were used to take clustering into account. Results showed that for children, the mean baseline composition of the 24-hour day in sleep, SB, light and moderate-to-vigorous PA for the intervention group was (11 hours 18 minutes; 6 hours 33 minutes; 5 hours 02 minutes, 1 hour 08 minutes) and for the control group (11 hours 18 minutes; 6 hours 35 minutes; 5 hours 04 minutes; 1 hour 06 minutes), respectively. For parents, the mean baseline composition was for the intervention group (8 hours 12 minutes; 9 hours 36 minutes; 5 hours 43 minutes; 27 minutes) and for the control group (8 hours 00 minute; 9 hours 00 minute; 6 hours 27 minutes; 33 minutes). No significant intervention effects were found on 24-hour physical behaviour composition of either parents or children (p = 0.19 and p = 0.21, respectively). A relatively small study population and a poor attendance rate among parents could maybe explain the lack of effectiveness. More effective strategies are needed to retain vulnerable families in interventions. Furthermore, future approaches to improve the 24-hour physical behaviour composition should maybe focus more specifically on PA, SB and sleep, and involve teachers, children and parents in the design of the intervention. Trial registration: NCT02393872 in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greet Cardon
- Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University , Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Ghent , Belgium
| | - Sebastien Chastin
- Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University , Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Ghent , Belgium
- Center for Living, School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University , Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow G4 0BA , UK
| | - Vicky Van Stappen
- Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University , Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Ghent , Belgium
| | - Nele Huys
- Ghent University, Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University , Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Ghent , Belgium
| | - Tanya Stefanova
- Medical University Varna, Clinic of Paediatric Endocrinology , UMHAT “St. Marina” 1 “Hr. Smirnenski” Blvd., Varna 9010 , Bulgaria
| | - Nevena Chakarova
- Medical University of Sofia, Department of Diabetology, Clinical Centre of Endocrinology , Bulgaria bul. “Pencho Slaveykov”, 1431 Sofia Center, Sofia, Bulgarije
| | - Jemina Kivelä
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare , Mannerheimintie 166, 00300 Helsinki , Finland
| | - Luis Alberto Moreno
- University of Zaragoza, GENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) , C/Domingo Miral s/n, 50009 Zaragoza , Spain
| | - Radó Sándor Istvánné
- University of Debrecen, Debreceni Egyetem (UoD) , Egyetem tér 1, Debrecen, 4032 Hungary
| | - Odysseas Androutsos
- Harokopio University, School of Health Science & Education, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University , 70, El Venizelou Ave, 176 71 Kallithea, Athens , Greece
| | - Yannis Manios
- Harokopio University, School of Health Science & Education, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University , 70, El Venizelou Ave, 176 71 Kallithea, Athens , Greece
| | - Marieke De Craemer
- Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) , Egmontstraat 5, 1000 Brussels , Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University , Ghent University Hospital B3, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent , Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brear MR, Shabangu PN, Hammarberg K, Fisher J. Enhancing demographic survey protocols to characterise household dynamics that influence health - a participatory approach from rural Eswatini. Glob Public Health 2021; 17:1699-1712. [PMID: 34061711 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1936118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Standard Western demographic survey protocols fail to capture dynamics, such as circular migration and support networks, that profoundly influence the health of non-Western domestic social groups, typically called households. Enhanced protocols are needed because survey data provide the primary evidence base for health policy and planning globally. We present the participatory development, implementation and analysis of a novel demographic survey protocol, that aimed to better capture domestic social dynamics in rural Eswatini, southern Africa. The multiple-method study incorporated participatory health research about a community affected by HIV/AIDS, of which the survey formed part, and an ethnography of the participatory survey development process. Analysis of the data revealed limitations in the reliability and validity of standardised survey questions for measuring household membership, in contexts where circular migration and polygamy are common. Standard survey protocols potentiate double-counting members and misclassifying 'child-headed' and 'female-headed' households. They neglect social and economic dynamics that are known to influence health. Our novel demographic survey protocol provides a simple alternative method for capturing core data about circular migration and its impact on health. The study illustrates the contributions participatory and ethnographic research can make to enhancing demographic surveys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Brear
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Global and Women's Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Anthropology and Development Studies, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Afromontane Research Unit, University of the Free State-Qwaqwa, Phuthaditjaba, South Africa
| | | | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Global and Women's Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Fisher
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Global and Women's Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wiloth S, Kramer B, Kiefer A, Wittek M, Böttner S, Fraas C, Kruse A. [The method of "town hall talks": a study protocol]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2020; 54:775-780. [PMID: 32997232 DOI: 10.1007/s00391-020-01788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Society is responsible for strengthening "caregiver-sensitive" communities based on the principle of social services to the public and are thus oriented towards the appreciation of caring relatives (CR) of people with dementia (PwD), their capability for self-care and participation. This requires methods to emphasize the social value of informal care and to re-evaluate existing support services. The article aims to present the method of "town hall talks". METHOD In 20 communities throughout Germany a public town hall talk in which CR, actors in the community (AC) and the citizens enter into a dialogue, was conducted. In three moderated discussion groups the question of communal responsibility for the provision of resources was addressed. These resources should encourage the CR ability of self-care as well as strategies for their support. In order to make a statement regarding the success of the project planning, three pilot town hall talks were evaluated. PREVIOUS RESULTS The recruitment of the population sample and the organization of the town hall talks in particular are administratively and logistically challenging. The project can only be successful through networking and intensive cooperation between scientists and the communities. In terms of content and logistics, the project planning of the pilot town hall talks was successful. The method received excellent ratings from the majority of the CR and AC. CONCLUSION Regarding the creation of caregiver-sensitive communities the town hall talks promise great potential. The specific benefit of the method for the CR and the community will be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Wiloth
- Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Birgit Kramer
- Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Anna Kiefer
- Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Maren Wittek
- Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Stephanie Böttner
- Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Claudia Fraas
- Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Kruse
- Institut für Gerontologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 20, 69115, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hill-Feltham PR, Johansson ML, Hodgetts WE, Ostevik AV, McKinnon BJ, Monksfield P, Sockalingam R, Wright T, Tysome JR. Hearing outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment in adults: a scoping review. Int J Audiol 2020; 60:239-245. [PMID: 32985284 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1820087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area. DESIGN Scoping review. STUDY SAMPLE Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss. RESULTS The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery. CONCLUSIONS A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny R Hill-Feltham
- Audiology Department, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin L Johansson
- Department of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Oticon Medical, Askim, Sweden
| | - William E Hodgetts
- Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amberley V Ostevik
- Institute for Reconstructive Sciences in Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Brian J McKinnon
- Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Department, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Tracy Wright
- ENT Department, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - James R Tysome
- The Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Otolaryngology Department, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Plunger P, Heimerl K, Tatzer VC, Zepke G, Finsterwald M, Pichler B, Reitinger E. Developing dementia-friendly pharmacies in Austria: a health promotion approach. Health Promot Int 2020; 35:702-713. [PMID: 31292603 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daz063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The need for integrated, accessible and person-centred care for people with dementia to foster quality of life and facilitate life in the community has been voiced by health policy. Pharmacies have the potential to provide easily accessible information and support for people with dementia, caregivers and the public. The 'Dementia-friendly Pharmacy' programme aimed at re-orienting community pharmacy in Austria, focusing on stronger inclusion of professional counselling into core services. It followed principles of health promotion and person-centred care, aiming at empowering all actors involved, and at fostering quality of life. Methodologically, the programme was based on participatory health research, thus involving all relevant actors and consolidating their perspectives on issues related to dementia care. In the course of the programme, a workshop series covering topics relevant for dementia care in community pharmacy, as well as prototypes for small-scale projects were developed, and measures were taken for securing sustainability. Findings related to programme development and implementation encompass pharmacy staff's motivation to participate in the programme, counselling knowledge and skills development, experience with building community partnerships and cross-organizational development and sustainability. Furthermore, effectiveness of the programme has been established. These findings are discussed against the background of re-orienting pharmacies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Plunger
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Vienna, Alserstraße 23/12, A 1080 Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Heimerl
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Vienna, Alserstraße 23/12, A 1080 Vienna, Austria
| | - Verena C Tatzer
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | | | | | - Barbara Pichler
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Vienna, Alserstraße 23/12, A 1080 Vienna, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Reitinger
- Department of Nursing Science, University of Vienna, Alserstraße 23/12, A 1080 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brear MR, Hammarberg K, Fisher J. Community participation in health research: an ethnography from rural Swaziland. Health Promot Int 2020; 35:e59-e69. [PMID: 30689897 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/day121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Community participation in all aspects of health research is widely advocated. However, there is a lack of specificity in reporting what community members actually do, and reported participation is typically limited to discrete research activities. Greater specificity in reporting has potential to clarify how community participation might occur and how it might influence empowerment and research rigour. We conducted an ethnographic study of participatory health research (PHR) in a socio-economically marginalized rural Swazi community. Data about 10 community co-researchers' participation in research workshops and field work were collected through participant observation over 14 months and analysed using directed content analysis, informed by the Comprehensive Community Participation in Research Framework (CCPRF). The analysis demonstrated that facilitating extensive community participation in PHR is feasible and identified 10 new research process activities in which community members might participate, for inclusion in an expanded CCPRF. We provide examples of how community members might participate in 57/59 expanded CCPRF activities and show that participatory, dialogue-based activities can be effective tools for facilitating research participation in ways that empower individual co-researchers and enhance research rigour. However, our results highlight limitations of community participation related to utilizing research results to inform actions, and empowering communities to control their environments and improve their health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R Brear
- Afromontane Research Unit and Faculty of Education, University of the Free State, Qwaqwa, South Africa.,Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Fisher
- Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nurturing Practitioner-Researcher Partnerships to Improve Adoption and Delivery of Research-Based Social and Public Health Services Worldwide. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16050862. [PMID: 30857292 PMCID: PMC6427324 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Research-based practices—psychosocial, behavioral, and public health interventions—have been demonstrated to be effective and often cost-saving treatments, but they can take up to two decades to reach practitioners within the health and human services workforce worldwide. Practitioners often rely on anecdotal evidence and their “practice wisdom” rather than on research, and may thus unintentionally provide less effective or ineffective services. Worldwide, community engagement in research is recommended, particularly in low-resource contexts. However, practitioner involvement has not been adequately explored in its own right as an innovative community-engaged practice that requires a tailored approach. The involvement of practitioners in research has been shown to improve their use of research-based interventions, and thus the quality of care and client outcomes. Nevertheless, the literature is lacking specificity about when and how (that is, using which tasks and procedures) to nurture and develop practitioner–researcher partnerships. This paper offers theoretical and empirical evidence on practitioner–researcher partnerships as an innovation with potential to enhance each phase of the research cycle and improve services, using data from the United States, Brazil, and Spain. Recommendations for partnership development and sustainability are offered, and a case is made for involving practitioners in research in order to advance social justice by amplifying the local relevance of research, increasing the likelihood of dissemination to community settings, and securing the sustainability of research-based interventions in practice settings.
Collapse
|
12
|
Harris M, Brathwaite R, McGowan CR, Ciccarone D, Gilchrist G, McCusker M, O'Brien K, Dunn J, Scott J, Hope V. 'Care and Prevent': rationale for investigating skin and soft tissue infections and AA amyloidosis among people who inject drugs in London. Harm Reduct J 2018; 15:23. [PMID: 29739408 PMCID: PMC5941602 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-018-0233-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among people who inject drugs (PWID). International data indicate up to one third of PWID have experienced an SSTI within the past month. Complications include sepsis, endocarditis and amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis. AA amyloidosis is a serious sequela of chronic SSTI among PWID. Though there is a paucity of literature reporting on AA amyloidosis among PWID, what has been published suggests there is likely a causal relationship between AA amyloidosis and injecting-related SSTI. If left untreated, AA amyloidosis can lead to renal failure; premature mortality among diagnosed PWID is high. Early intervention may reverse disease. Despite the high societal and individual burden of SSTI among PWID, empirical evidence on the barriers and facilitators to injecting-related SSTI prevention and care or the feasibility and acceptability of AA amyloidosis screening and treatment referral are limited. This study aims to fill these gaps and assess the prevalence of AA amyloidosis among PWID. METHODS Care and Prevent is a UK National Institute for Health Research-funded mixed-methods study. In five phases (P1-P5), we aim to assess the evidence for AA amyloidosis among PWID (P1); assess the feasibility of AA amyloidosis screening, diagnostic and treatment referral among PWID in London (P2); investigate the barriers and facilitators to AA amyloidosis care (P3); explore SSTI protection and risk (P4); and co-create harm reduction resources with the affected community (P5). This paper describes the conceptual framework, methodological design and proposed analysis for the mixed-methods multi-phase study. RESULTS We are implementing the Care and Prevent protocol in London. The systematic review component of the study has been completed and published. Care and Prevent will generate an estimate of AA amyloidosis prevalence among community recruited PWID in London, with implications for the development of screening recommendations and intervention implementation. We aim to recruit 400 PWID from drug treatment services in London, UK. CONCLUSIONS Care and Prevent is the first study to assess screening feasibility and the prevalence of positive proteinuria, as a marker for AA amyloidosis, among PWID accessing drug treatment services. AA amyloidosis is a serious, yet under-recognised condition for which early intervention is available but not employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Harris
- Department of Public Health, Environments, and Society London, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - R Brathwaite
- Department of Public Health, Environments, and Society London, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Catherine R McGowan
- Department of Public Health, Environments, and Society London, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.,Humanitarian Public Health Technical Unit, Save the Children UK, London, UK
| | - D Ciccarone
- Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Franciso, CA, 94143, USA
| | - G Gilchrist
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, National Addiction Centre, King's College London, 4 Windsor Walk, London, SE5 8BB, UK
| | - M McCusker
- Lambeth Service Users Forum, Lorraine Hewitt House, Brighton Terrace, London, SW9 8DG, UK
| | - K O'Brien
- Camden Drug Services, The Margarete Centre, 108 Hampstead Road, London, NW1 2LS, UK
| | - J Dunn
- Camden Drug Services, The Margarete Centre, 108 Hampstead Road, London, NW1 2LS, UK
| | - J Scott
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
| | - V Hope
- Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, 79 Tithebarn Street, Liverpool, L2 2ER, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
de Wit M, Kirwan JR, Tugwell P, Beaton D, Boers M, Brooks P, Collins S, Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Hofstetter C, Hughes R, Leong A, Lyddiatt A, March L, May J, Montie P, Richards P, Simon LS, Singh JA, Strand V, Voshaar M, Bingham CO, Gossec L. Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years' Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT). PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2017; 10:141-152. [PMID: 27704486 PMCID: PMC5362656 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
There is increasing interest in making patient participation an integral component of medical research. However, practical guidance on optimizing this engagement in healthcare is scarce. Since 2002, patient involvement has been one of the key features of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) international consensus effort. Based on a review of cumulative data from qualitative studies and internal surveys among OMERACT participants, we explored the potential benefits and challenges of involving patient research partners in conferences and working group activities. We supplemented our review with personal experiences and reflections regarding patient participation in the OMERACT process. We found that between 2002 and 2016, 67 patients have attended OMERACT conferences, of whom 28 had sustained involvement; many other patients contributed to OMERACT working groups. Their participation provided face validity to the OMERACT process and expanded the research agenda. Essential facilitators have been the financial commitment to guarantee sustainable involvement of patients at these conferences, procedures for recruitment, selection and support, and dedicated time allocated in the program for patient issues. Current challenges include the representativeness of the patient panel, risk of pseudo-professionalization, and disparity in patients’ and researchers’ perception of involvement. In conclusion, OMERACT has embedded long-term patient involvement in the consensus-building process on the measurement of core health outcomes. This integrative process continues to evolve iteratively. We believe that the practical points raised here can improve participatory research implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten de Wit
- OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Medical Humanities, VU University Medical Centre/EMGO+ instituut, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - John R Kirwan
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Dorcas Beaton
- Musculoskeletal Health and Outcomes Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maarten Boers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Brooks
- Centre for Health Policy School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Philip G Conaghan
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino
- Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, APHP, Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | | | - Rod Hughes
- Ashford St Peter's Foundation trust Hospital, Chertsey, Surrey, UK
| | - Amye Leong
- OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.,Healthy Motivations, Santa Barbara, CA, 93108, USA.,Bone and Joint Decade, The Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health, Truro, Cornwall, UK
| | - Ann Lyddiatt
- OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lyn March
- Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Sydney Medical School and School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - James May
- OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pamela Montie
- OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Arthritis Patient Advisory Board, Arthritis Research Centre Canada, Richmond, BC, Canada
| | - Pamela Richards
- Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK.,OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Medicine Service, VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.,Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Division Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Marieke Voshaar
- OMERACT Patient Research Partner, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Clifton O Bingham
- Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laure Gossec
- Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, GRC-08, Paris, France.,Rheumatology Department, Pitie-Salpétrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Allen ML, Salsberg J, Knot M, LeMaster JW, Felzien M, Westfall JM, Herbert CP, Vickery K, Culhane-Pera KA, Ramsden VR, Zittleman L, Martin RE, Macaulay AC. Engaging with communities, engaging with patients: amendment to the NAPCRG 1998 Policy Statement on Responsible Research With Communities. Fam Pract 2017; 34:313-321. [PMID: 27543087 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 1998, the North American Primary Care Research Group (NAPCRG) adopted a groundbreaking Policy Statement endorsing responsible participatory research (PR) with communities. Since that time, PR gained prominence in primary care research. OBJECTIVES To reconsider the original 1998 Policy Statement in light of increased uptake of PR, and suggest future directions and applications for PR in primary care. This work contributed to an updated Policy Statement endorsed by NAPCRG in 2015. METHODS 32 university and 30 community NAPCRG-affiliated research partners, convened a workshop to document lessons learned about implementing processes and principles of PR. This document emerged from that session and reflection and discussion regarding the original Policy Statement, the emerging PR literature, and our own experiences. RESULTS The foundational principles articulated in the 1998 Policy Statement remain relevant to the current PR environment. Lessons learned since its publication include that the maturation of partnerships is facilitated by participatory processes that support increased community responsibility for research projects, and benefits generated through PR extend beyond research outcomes. Future directions that will move forward the field of PR in primary care include: (i) improve assessment of PR processes to better delineate the links between how PR teams work together and diverse PR outcomes, (ii) increase the number of models incorporating PR into translational research from project inception to dissemination, and (iii) increase application of PR approaches that support patient engagement in clinical settings to patient-provider relationship and practice change research. CONCLUSION PR has markedly altered the manner in which primary care research is undertaken in partnership with communities and its principles and philosophies continue to offer means to assure that research results and processes improve the health of all communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele L Allen
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jon Salsberg
- Participatory Research at McGill, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michaela Knot
- Participatory Research at McGill, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Joseph W LeMaster
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - John M Westfall
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Carol P Herbert
- Department of Family Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Vickery
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Family Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Vivian R Ramsden
- Department of Academic Family Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan,Canada and
| | - Linda Zittleman
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Ruth Elwood Martin
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Ann C Macaulay
- Participatory Research at McGill, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brear M, Hammarberg K, Fisher J. Community participation in research from resource-constrained countries: a scoping review. Health Promot Int 2017; 33:723-733. [DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dax010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Brear
- Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 2, St Kilda Rd, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 2, St Kilda Rd, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Fisher
- Jean Hailes Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Level 2, St Kilda Rd, Prahran, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Penrod J, Loeb SJ, Ladonne RA, Martin LM. Empowering Change Agents in Hierarchical Organizations: Participatory Action Research in Prisons. Res Nurs Health 2016; 39:142-53. [PMID: 27028096 DOI: 10.1002/nur.21716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Participatory action research (PAR) approaches harness collaborative partnerships to stimulate change in defined communities. The purpose of this article is to illustrate key methodological strategies used in the application of PAR methods in the particularly challenging environment of a hierarchical organization. A study designed to promote sustainable, insider-generated system-level changes in the provision of end-of-life (EOL) care in the restrictive setting of six state prisons is used as an exemplar of the application of three cardinal principles of PAR. First, development of a collaborative network with active partnership between outsider academic researchers and insider co-researchers began with careful attention to understanding the culture and processes of prisons and gaining the support of organizational leadership, using qualitative data gathering and trust-building. During the implementation phase, promoting co-ownership of change in EOL care through the co-construction of knowledge and systems to enhance sustainable change required carefully-orchestrated strategies to maximize the collaborative spirit of the project. Co-researchers were empowered to examine their worlds and capture opportunities for change using new leadership skills role-modeled by the research team. Third, their local knowledge of the barriers inherent in the contextual reality of prisons was translated into achievable system change by production of a toolkit of formalized and well-rehearsed change strategies that collaborative teams were empowered to enact within their hierarchical prison environment. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice Penrod
- Professor, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, 201 Nursing Sciences Building, University Park, PA 16802
| | - Susan J Loeb
- Associate Professor, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| | - Robert A Ladonne
- Community Partner, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| | - Lea M Martin
- Community Partner, College of Nursing, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boote J, Wong R, Booth A. 'Talking the talk or walking the walk?' A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009. Health Expect 2015; 18:44-57. [PMID: 23033933 PMCID: PMC5060762 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterise the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009. METHODS Papers were identified from three systematic reviews, one narrative review and two bibliographies. The analysis identified journals where papers were published; countries of lead authors; types of public involved; health topic areas; and stages of research involving the public. Papers were also classified as to whether they were literature reviews or empirical studies; focused on participatory/action research; were qualitative, quantitative or mixed-method. The number of papers published per year was also examined. FINDINGS Of the 683 papers identified, 297 were of USA origin and 223 were of UK origin. Of the 417 empirical papers: (i) participatory/action research approach was dominant, together with qualitative data collection methods; (ii) the stage of research the public was most involved was question identification; (iii) indigenous groups were most commonly involved; (iv) mental health was the most common health topic. Published studies peaked in 2006. CONCLUSIONS The present study identifies publication patterns in public involvement in health research and provides evidence to suggest that researchers increasingly are 'walking the walk' with respect to public involvement, with empirical studies consistently out-numbering literature reviews from 1998.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Boote
- NIHR Research Design Service for Yorkshire and the Humber
| | - Ruth Wong
- Information SpecialistSchool of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of Sheffield
| | - Andrew Booth
- School of Health and Related ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pinto RM, Spector AY, Witte SS, Gilbert L. Systematizing planning and formative phases of HIV prevention research: Case studies from Brazil, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan. GLOBAL SOCIAL WELFARE : RESEARCH, POLICY & PRACTICE 2014; 1:137-144. [PMID: 25489495 PMCID: PMC4257476 DOI: 10.1007/s40609-014-0020-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES International Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) is vulnerable to contextual, political, and interpersonal issues that may hamper researchers' abilities to develop and sustain partnerships with local communities. This paper responds to a call for systematizing CBPR practices and to the urgent need for frameworks with potential to facilitate partnership-building between researchers and communities in both "developed" and "developing" countries. METHODS Using three brief case examples, each from a different context, with different partners and varied research questions, we demonstrate how to apply the International Participatory Research Framework (IPRF). RESULTS IPRF consists of triangulated procedures (steps and actions) that can facilitate known participatory outcomes: 1) community-defined research goals, 2) capacity for further research, and 3) policies and programs grounded in research. CONCLUSIONS We show how the application of this model is particularly helpful in the planning and formative phases of CBPR. Other partnerships can use this framework in its entirety or aspects thereof, in different contexts. Further evaluation of how this framework can help other international partnerships, studying myriad diseases and conditions, should be a focus of future international CBPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rogério M Pinto
- Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027
| | - Anya Y Spector
- HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Columbia University and New York State Psychiatric Institute, 722 West 168 Street room 307, New York, NY 10032
| | - Susan S Witte
- Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027
| | - Louisa Gilbert
- Columbia University School of Social Work, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Charlebois K, Loignon C, Boudreault-Fournier A, Dupéré S, Grabovschi C. [The involvement of vulnerable people in participatory research in primary care: a literature review]. Glob Health Promot 2014; 21:38-45. [PMID: 24662011 DOI: 10.1177/1757975913517123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Malgré un vif intérêt pour la participation des patients à la gestion et à la prestation des soins de santé primaires, il n’existe aucune revue de la littérature sur le rôle des personnes vulnérables dans les projets de recherche participative menés dans le domaine des soins primaires. Une revue de la littérature de type narrative a été menée afin de combler cette lacune. L’objectif principal de cette revue a été d’évaluer le rôle des personnes vulnérables au sein de projets de recherche participative. Notre revue a recensé 26 articles et analysé 33 projets de recherche ou d’intervention en soins primaires. Elle révèle de nombreux écueils concernant l’implication des personnes vulnérables. Ces personnes ont joué un rôle varié, mais surtout modeste ou limité au sein des différents projets. Leur implication a surtout eu lieu à l’étape de la collecte des données. Peu de projets ont permis aux personnes vulnérables de prendre part à l’analyse des données ou à la diffusion des connaissances. Les tensions entre les chercheurs et les personnes vulnérables et la tendance à intégrer des acteurs organisés au sein des projets ont contribué à affaiblir le degré de participation des personnes vulnérables, et ce, à diverses étapes du processus de recherche et du développement d’intervention. Malgré tout, plusieurs retombées positives ont été identifiées, tant pour la communauté et les personnes vulnérables que pour les chercheurs. Entre autres, les projets ont permis aux chercheurs non universitaires d’acquérir de nouvelles compétences. De plus, certains projets ont favorisé la mise en place de nouveaux modèles de prestations de soins. Enfin, différents mécanismes permettant de rehausser la réciprocité entre les chercheurs et les personnes vulnérables sont proposés comme solutions pour réduire les inégalités et les tensions et, ultimement, favoriser l’implication des personnes vulnérables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen Charlebois
- Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Christine Loignon
- Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Sophie Dupéré
- Faculté des Sciences Infirmières, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Cristina Grabovschi
- Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pinto RM, Wall MM, Spector AY. Modeling the Structure of Partnership Between Researchers and Front-Line Service Providers: Strengthening Collaborative Public Health Research. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH 2014; 8:83-106. [PMID: 25309155 PMCID: PMC4193907 DOI: 10.1177/1558689813490835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Partnerships between HIV researchers and service providers are essential for reducing the gap between research and practice. Community-Based Participatory Research principles guided this cross-sectional study, combining 40 in-depth interviews with surveys of 141 providers in 24 social service agencies in New York City. We generated the Provider-Researcher Partnership Model to account for provider- and agency-level factors' influence on intentions to form partnerships with researchers. Providers preferred "balanced partnerships" in which researchers and providers allocated research tasks and procedures to reflect diverse knowledge/skill sets. An organizational culture that values research can help enhance providers' intentions to partner. Providers' intentions and priorities found in this study may encourage researchers to engage in and policy makers to fund collaborative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anya Y. Spector
- HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wright MT, Nöcker G, Pawils S, Walter U. Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung – ein neuer Ansatz für die Präventionsforschung. PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s11553-013-0400-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
22
|
|
23
|
Wright MT, Block M, Kilian H, Lemmen K. Förderung von Qualitätsentwicklung durch Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung. PRÄVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFÖRDERUNG 2013. [DOI: 10.1007/s11553-013-0396-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
24
|
de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Collins S, Kirwan J. Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ Open 2013; 3:e002241. [PMID: 23667160 PMCID: PMC3651970 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2012] [Revised: 04/02/2013] [Accepted: 04/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the inclusion of patients as international research partners in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) conferences and how this has influenced the scope and conduct of outcomes research in rheumatology. DESIGN A thematic content analysis of OMERACT internal documents, publications and conference proceedings, followed by a responsive evaluation including 32 qualitative semistructured interviews. SETTING The international, biannual research conference OMERACT 10 (Malaysia, 2010). PARTICIPANTS Senior researchers (n=10), junior researchers (n=2), representatives of the pharmaceutical industry and regulators (n=2), conference staff (n=2), new patient delegates (n=8) and experienced patient delegates (n=8). RESULTS The role of patients evolved over 10 years from a single patient focus group to full participation in all areas of the meeting and inclusion in research group meetings between conferences. Five main categories of impact emerged: widening the research agenda; including patient relevant outcomes in core sets; enhancing patient reported instruments; changing the culture of OMERACT and consequences outside OMERACT. Patient participants identified previously neglected outcome domains such as fatigue, sleep disturbances and flares which prompted collaborative working on new programmes of research. Specific benefits and challenges for patients and professionals were identified, such as personal fulfilment, widening of research interests, difficulties in establishing equal partnerships and concerns about loss of research rigour. CONCLUSIONS Including patients as partners in OMERACT conferences has widened its focus and adjusted the way of working. It has resulted in new developments in the research agenda and the use of more patient-relevant outcomes in clinical trials. These collaborations have influenced perceptions and beliefs among many patients and researchers, and led to wider patient involvement as partners in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten de Wit
- Metamedica, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lam CG, Cohen KJ, Roter DL. Coping Needs in Adolescents with Cancer: A Participatory Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2012.0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine G. Lam
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Kenneth J. Cohen
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Debra L. Roter
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pinto RM, da Silva SB, Penido C, Spector AY. International Participatory Research Framework: triangulating procedures to build health research capacity in Brazil. Health Promot Int 2012; 27:435-44. [PMID: 22144416 PMCID: PMC3733101 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dar090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
This study advances Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) by presenting a set of triangulated procedures (steps and actions) that can facilitate participatory research in myriad international settings. By using procedural triangulation-the combination of specific steps and actions as the basis for the International Participatory Research Framework (IPRF)-our approach can improve the abilities of researchers and practitioners worldwide to systematize the development of research partnerships. The IPRF comprises four recursive steps: (i) contextualizing the host country; (ii) identifying collaborators in the host country; (iii) seeking advice and endorsement from gatekeepers and (iv) matching partners' expertise, needs and interests. IPRF includes the following sets of recursive participatory actions: (A(1)) becoming familiar with local languages and culture; (A(2)) sharing power, ideas, influence and resources; (A(3)) gathering oral and written information about partners; (A(4)) establishing realistic expectations and (A(5)) resolving personal and professional differences. We show how these steps and actions were used recursively to build a partnership to study the roles of community health workers (CHWs) in Brazil's Family Health Program (PSF). The research conducted using IPRF focused on HIV prevention, and it included nearly 200 CHWs. By using the IPRF, our partnership achieved several participatory outcomes: community-defined research aims, capacity for future research and creation of new policies and programs. We engaged CHWs who requested that we study their training needs, and we engaged CHWs' supervisors who used the data collected to modify CHW training. Data collected from CHWs will form the basis for a grant to test CHW training curricula. Researchers and community partners can now use the IPRF to build partnerships in different international contexts. By triangulating steps and actions, the IPRF advances knowledge about the use of CBPR methods/procedures for international health research.
Collapse
|
27
|
Mantoura P, Potvin L. A realist-constructionist perspective on participatory research in health promotion. Health Promot Int 2012; 28:61-72. [PMID: 22952337 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/das037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Clarifying the contours of research in health promotion (HP) is an ongoing challenge. Research in this action-oriented field has traditionally been developed based on values such as participation and empowerment. Consequently, many forms of participatory research have emerged throughout the years, and participatory research has positioned itself as a core competency of HP and public health. This paper argues that participation as a normative stance guiding methodology, or as value, is a fragile posture upon which to position research practices. The argument is based on a realist-constructionist perspective of science and specifically uses Law and Latour's notion of inscription device and Callon's actor-network theory to suggest that participation is an epistemological necessity and that participatory research practices may be considered as inscription devices. These theoretical notions help clarify the consequences of participation on knowledge production. Finally, the article refers to Stengers's work to propose an ecology of research practices that defines obligations and exigencies for HP with respect to knowledge production and that are more consistent with the field's values of social justice and equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascale Mantoura
- Institut de recherche en santé publique de l'Université de Montreal, Public Health Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Johnson RM. Addressing challenges in participatory research partnerships in the North: opening a conversation. Int J Circumpolar Health 2012; 71:IJCH-71-18477. [PMID: 22973564 PMCID: PMC3417683 DOI: 10.3402/ijch.v71i0.18477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda M. Johnson
- Rhonda M. Johnson, DrPH, MPH, FNP, Chair, Department of Health Sciences, Professor of Public Health, University of Alaska Anchorage, DPL 405, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508-4614, Tel: 907-786-6545, Fax: 907-786-6572.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Differences in individual empowerment outcomes of socially disadvantaged women: effects of mode of participation and structural changes in a physical activity promotion program. Int J Public Health 2010; 56:465-73. [PMID: 21076931 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-010-0214-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2010] [Revised: 10/19/2010] [Accepted: 10/21/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study explored the differences in individual empowerment outcomes of a group of socially disadvantaged women participating in physical activity promotion. The outcomes observed were assessed in the context of the women's mode of participation and the structural organizational and community level changes, which took place during the implementation of the program. METHODS Fifteen semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Two groups of women participated in the interviews--those involved in the whole process of planning, implementation and evaluation of the program and those who took part in the program activities. RESULTS Individual empowerment outcomes were achieved for all those interviewed, although those participating in the planning, implementation and evaluation of the program achieved the greatest. A number of organizational and community level processes were also identified that supported the individual empowerment of those taking part. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the use of multilevel empowerment approaches to health as they help to identify the ideal characteristics that organizations and communities should possess and the potential structural changes required to support individual empowerment.
Collapse
|