Physical activity and awareness in breast screening attendees in Black Country, UK

Mammography use in relation to comorbidities and functional limitations among older breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

We sought to examine associations of mammography utilization with comorbidities and functional limitations in older breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

Female breast cancer survivors (N = 1064) identified in the 2016 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) who were aged ≥ 65 years were included for this study. Mammography use, major comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthritis, chronic kidney disease, depression, and malignancy other than breast cancer), functional limitations (impairment of vision, audition, cognition, and mobility), and other covariates were measured by self-report. We used multivariable logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of comorbidities and functional limitations. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age (65-74 vs. ≥ 75 years) and survival time (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 years), and interactions were examined by Wald tests.

RESULTS

Of the 1064 respondents, 841 (79.0%) had comorbidities, 418 (39.3%) had functional limitations, and 744 (69.9%) underwent mammography last year. Overall, the mean age was 73.8 years (SD = 5.1 years) and 91.4% were white. The multivariable model identified inverse associations with mammography use for functional limitations (≥ 2 vs. 0: aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39-0.95, p-trend = 0.09) but not comorbidities (≥ 2 vs. 0: aOR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.61-1.35, p-trend = 0.62). The Wald test did not find any significant interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher burden of functional limitations, not comorbidities, is associated with a lower rate of mammography use among older breast cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Interventions are needed to individualize surveillance mammography among older breast cancer survivors based on their health status.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer with pirarubicin versus epirubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide and docetaxel

Breast cancers (BC) are treated with surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an emerging treatment option in many cancers and is given before primary therapy to shrink tumor size. The efficacy of NACT in varied settings of BC, such as inoperable tumors, borderline resectable tumors, and breast-conserving surgery, has been debated extensively in literature, and the results remain unclear and depended on a wide variety of factors such as cancer type, disease extent, and the specific combination of chemotherapy drugs. This study was performed to examine the efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability of pirarubicin (THP) and epirubicin (EPI) in combination with docetaxel and cyclophosphamide in a NACT setting for BC. A total of 48 patients with stage II or III breast cancers were randomly divided into two groups: THP group and EPI group. The patients in THP group received 2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DTC regimen (docetaxel, THP, cyclophosphamide), while patients in the EPI group received 2-4 cycles of DEC regimen (docetaxel, EPI, cyclophosphamide) before surgery. The incidence of adverse reactions and the efficacy of the treatment regimen were compared between the two groups. Prognostic evaluation indexes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, including the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The overall response rate in THP group was 83.3 %, and the EPI group showed a response rate of 79.2 %, with no statistically significant difference in response rate between the two groups. The incidence of cardiac toxicity, myelosuppression, nausea, and vomiting in the THP group was significantly lower than the EPI group (all P < 0.05). The incidence of hepatic toxicity, alopecia, and diarrhea in the THP group was also lower than the EPI group, but these differences were not statistically significant. The 5-year DFS and OS in THP versus EPI groups were 80 versus 76 % (DFS) and 86 versus 81 % (OS), respectively. Our study found that NACT with DTC regimen and DEC regimen were both very effective in treatment of BC. However, THP-based combination therapy was associated with significantly lower incidence of cardiac toxicity, myelosuppression, nausea, and vomiting.