Molecular genetic evaluation of Pediatric Renovascular hypertension due to renal artery stenosis and abdominal aortic Coarctation in Neurofibromatosis type 1

Nonatherosclerotic Renovascular Hypertension

Renovascular hypertension (RVH) is a secondary form of high blood pressure resulting from impaired blood flow to the kidneys with subsequent activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Often, this occurs due to abnormally small, narrowed, or blocked blood vessels supplying one or both kidneys (ie: renal artery occlusive disease) and is correctable. Juxtaglomerular cells release renin in response to decreased pressure, which in turn catalyzes the cleavage of circulating angiotensinogen synthesized by the liver to the decapeptide angiotensin I. Angiotensin-converting enzyme then cleaves angiotensin I to form the octapeptide angiotensin II, a potent vasopressor and the primary effector of renin-induced hypertension. The effects of angiotensin II are mediated by signaling downstream of its receptors. Angiotensin receptor type 1 is a G-protein-coupled receptor that activates vasoconstrictor and mitogenic signaling pathways resulting in peripheral arteriolar vasoconstriction and increased renal tubular reabsorption of sodium and water which promotes intravascular volume expansion. Angiotensin II stimulates the adrenal cortical release of aldosterone, which promotes renal tubular sodium reabsorption, resulting in volume expansion. Angiotensin II acts on glial cells and regions of the brain responsible for blood pressure regulation increasing renal sympathetic activation. Angiotensin II simulates the release of vasopressin from the pituitary which stimulates thirst and water reabsorption from the kidney to expand the intravascular volume and cause peripheral vasoconstriction (increased sympathetic tone). All of these mechanisms coalesce to increase arterial pressure by way of arteriolar constriction, enhanced cardiac output, and the retention of sodium and water.

Burden of Rare Genetic Variants in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection With High-risk Features

Importance

The emerging genetic basis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has been defined as both partially complex and monogenic in some patients, involving variants predominantly in genes known to underlie vascular connective tissue diseases (CTDs). The effect of these genetic influences has not been defined in high-risk SCAD phenotypes, and the identification of a high-risk subgroup of individuals may help to guide clinical genetic evaluations of SCAD.

Objective

To identify and quantify the burden of rare genetic variation in individuals with SCAD with high-risk clinical features.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed for subsequent case-control association analyses and individual variant annotation among individuals with high-risk SCAD. Genetic variants were annotated for pathogenicity by in-silico analysis of genes previously defined by sequencing for vascular CTDs and/or SCAD, as well as genes prioritized by genome-wide association study (GWAS) and colocalization of arterial expression quantitative trait loci. Unbiased genome-wide association analysis of the WES data was performed by comparing aggregated variants in individuals with SCAD to healthy matched controls or the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This study was conducted at a tertiary care center. Individuals in the Canadian SCAD Registry genetics study with a high-risk SCAD phenotype were selected and defined as peripartum SCAD, recurrent SCAD, or SCAD in an individual with family history of arteriopathy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Burden of genetic variants defined by DNA sequencing in individuals with high-risk SCAD.

Results

This study included a total of 336 participants (mean [SD] age, 53.0 [9.5] years; 301 female participants [90%]). Variants in vascular CTD genes were identified in 17.0% of individuals (16 of 94) with high-risk SCAD and were enriched (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.6-4.2; P = 7.8 × 10-4) as compared with gnomAD, with leading significant signals in COL3A1 (OR, 13.4; 95% CI, 4.9-36.2; P = 2.8 × 10-4) and Loeys-Dietz syndrome genes (OR, 7.9; 95% CI, 2.9-21.2; P = 2.0 × 10-3). Variants in GWAS-prioritized genes, observed in 6.4% of individuals (6 of 94) with high-risk SCAD, were also enriched (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6-8.2; P = 7.4 × 10-3). Variants annotated as likely pathogenic or pathogenic occurred in 4 individuals, in the COL3A1, TGFBR2, and ADAMTSL4 genes. Genome-wide aggregated variant testing identified novel associations with peripartum SCAD.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this genetic study, approximately 1 in 5 individuals with a high-risk SCAD phenotype harbored a rare genetic variant in genes currently implicated for SCAD. Genetic screening in this subgroup of individuals presenting with SCAD may be considered.