A randomized study comparing air to Echovist as a contrast medium in the assessment of tubal patency in infertile women using transvaginal salpingosonography

Safety aspects and side-effects of ExEm-gel and foam for uterine cavity distension and tubal patency testing

A state-of-the-art overview of the safety and side-effects of ExEm-gel for uterine cavity distension and ExEm-foam for tubal patency testing is presented. A literature search was carried out using PubMed, textbooks, pharmaceutical databases and reports of toxicity tests. Information on clinical use in humans and experiments in animal models was collected and grouped according to the following components: glycerol, hydroxyethyl cellulose and purified water; subjects included toxicity test, influence on sperm cells, oocytes, blastocyst development, uterine cavity distension, tubal patency testing, pain and obstetric applications. No unknown side-effects of gel or foam, or unexpected concerns about safety, were reported. More information than expected was available on the absence of effects of the components on various human tissues. Although it is difficult to prove that the search is complete, and it is possible that side-effects remain unreported, the combination of glycerol, hydroxyethyl cellulose and purified water is considered to be safe for intrauterine application and tubal patency testing, indicating an optimal risk-benefit ratio in clinical use. The safest strategy, however, is to restrict clinical examinations with gel and foam to the pre-ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle.

B-flow ultrasound facilitates visualization of contrast medium during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography

OBJECTIVE

To assess if B-flow ultrasound improves visualization of flow of contrast medium in the Fallopian tubes during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) compared with grayscale ultrasound.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 160 women referred for HyCoSy as part of infertility work-up between January 2011 and September 2012. In each woman, at the same session, HyCoSy was performed first using saline with air and then using Sonovue®, and for each contrast medium, grayscale ultrasound was first used and then B-flow ultrasound was used. Flow of contrast was observed in three parts of each tube: intramural, middle and distal.

RESULTS

In 129 (81%) women, flow of Sonovue was observed in the intramural part of both tubes and in the pouch of Douglas when using grayscale ultrasound. In these women, flow of Sonovue was seen in the middle part of 70% of the 258 tubes when using grayscale ultrasound and in 93% when using B-flow ultrasound; and in the distal part in 81% when using grayscale ultrasound and in 98% when using B-flow ultrasound. When using air and saline, flow was seen in the intramural part of 90% and 93% of the tubes, in the middle part in 54% and 72%, and in the distal part in 66% and 90%, using grayscale ultrasound and B-flow ultrasound, respectively.

CONCLUSION

B-flow ultrasound facilitates detection of flow of contrast in the middle and distal parts of the tubes at HyCoSy, especially when a mixture of saline and air is used as contrast medium.

Hysterosalpingosonography for diagnosing tubal occlusion in subfertile women: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Hysterosalpingosonography has been suggested as a less invasive alternative to hysterosalpingography for detecting tubal occlusion among subfertile women. We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingosonography and to compare it to hysterosalpingography.

METHODS/DESIGN

We will conduct a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. We will search Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Biosis, as well as reference lists of included studies and previous related review articles. Diagnostic studies that compared hysterosalpingosonography ± hysterosalpingography to laparoscopy with chromotubation in women suffering from subfertility will be eligible. Two authors will independently screen for inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study 2 tool (QUADAS-2). We will use SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 2011) to program bivariate random-effects models, estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals and to generate summary receiver operating characteristics curves. We will perform sensitivity analyses to examine the effect of differences in techniques used for hysterosalpingosonography and in methodological quality of studies.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review will help to determine if hysterosalpingosonography is an adequate alternative screening test for diagnosing tubal occlusion. Accuracy of specific sono-HSG techniques may also be identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This review has been registered at PROSPERO. The registration number is CRD42013003829.

First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to describe the first experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) as a first step routine office procedure for tubal patency testing.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study was started in a university affiliated teaching hospital. In 2010, 73 patients with subfertility and a low risk of tubal pathology were examined. A non-toxic foam containing hydroxymethylcellulose and glycerol was applicated through a cervical applicator for contrast sonography (HyFoSy). Tubal patency was determined by transvaginal ultrasonographic demonstration of echogenic dispersion of foam in the Fallopian tube and/or the peritoneal cavity. Only in case patency could not be demonstrated, a hysterosalpingography (HSG) was performed as a control.

RESULTS

In 67 out of 73 (92%) patients, a successful procedure was performed. In 57 out of 73 (78%) cases, there was no further need for a HSG. In five patients (5/73; 7%) tubal occlusion was confirmed by HSG and in five patients (5/73; 7%) there was discordance between HyFoSy and HSG. Of 73 patients, 14 (19%) conceived within a median of 3 months after the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

HyFoSy is a successful procedure to demonstrate tubal patency as a first step office procedure.

Should a hysterosalpingogram be a first-line investigation to diagnose female tubal subfertility in the modern subfertility workup?

Tubal assessment is an integral part of female fertility evaluation. While diagnostic laparoscopy is gold standard, it is not suitable to be used as a screening test. Hysterosalpingogram (HSG) has been advocated as first-line investigation historically. With advances in diagnostics, more tests are available, such as hysterosalpingo contrast sonography (HyCoSy) and Chlamydia antibody titre (CAT) are available. The CAT test is much cheaper, less invasive and can be performed at any time during the cycle. The CAT test can also be used as a means of identifying which patients need further evaluation. HyCoSy has same diagnostic accuracy as HSG, without exposing women to radiation. We argue that HSG is out of date and has no place in a modern infertility evaluation. We also suggest a pathway (based on history, clinical and ultrasound evaluation) for investigations to screen for and diagnose tubal pathology.

Comparison of the pain experienced by infertile women undergoing hysterosalpingo contrast sonography or radiographic hysterosalpingography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pain and cause of pain experienced by women undergoing hysterosalpingography (HSG) and contrast hysterosalpingo sonography (HyCoSy) with air in a saline solution for the assessment of uterine and tubal patency.

METHOD

In this prospective study, 121 infertile women undergoing these 2 procedures measured the pain incurred using a digital/analog scale (1-10). We looked for correlations between pain level and variables pertaining to the procedures. Vagal effects and their persistence were also recorded.

RESULTS

The pain was less during HSG (median, 5) than during HyCoSy (median, 7). It was greater than menstrual pain for 38.8% of participants during HSG and for 70.5% of participants during HyCoSy. There was no correlation between pain and difficult catheter passage, degree of tubal obstruction, volume of contrast medium injected, or presence of IgG antibodies to Chlamydia when these variables were studied for HyCoSy alone. However, the strong correlation between pain score and volume of contrast medium injected during each procedure seems to explain the significantly higher pain levels during HyCoSy (P<0.001). In 65.3% and 57.8% of participants, respectively, the pain disappeared immediately after the HSG or HyCoSy. Only mild vagal effects were recorded following both procedures, in 0.8% of participants after HSG and 2.5% of participants after HyCoSy.

CONCLUSION

Hysterosalpingo contrast sonography is similar to HSG regarding rapidity of pain disappearance, and infrequency and moderation of vagal effects, but the level of pain is slightly higher, probably due to the greater volume of medium injected.

Hysterosalpingocontrastsonography in clinical practice

The aim of this study was to review the indication, source of referral and findings at hysterosalpingocontrastsonography (HyCoSy) of the first 100 patients referred for this new service in the gynaecological outpatients department of the Coombe Women's Hospital, Dublin. Of the first 100 women referred for HyCoSy, the indication for referral was investigation of infertility in 72%, recurrent miscarriage in 22% and other reasons in 6%. Sixty-four women were referred from general gynaecological clinics, 29 from the specialised infertility clinic and seven women were referred from other hospitals. The procedure was completed in 97% of cases and tubal patency successfully assessed in 95%. Saline hysterosonography was performed in 96 cases. Tubal assessment with Echovistt showed bilateral tubal patency in 73%, bilateral occlusion in 10% and unilateral patency in 12%. All women were discharged within 30 minutes of the procedure. We concluded that hysterosalpingocontrastsonography is an easily introduced, successful outpatient technique, which is well tolerated by women and provides clinically relevant information in women with infertility or recurrent miscarriage.

Tolerability, side effects, and complications of hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the tolerability, side effects and complications of hysterosalpingocontrast sonography (HyCoSy).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

669 infertile women.

INTERVENTION(S)

All patients were examined with HyCoSy and monitored for 30 minutes after the procedure. A telephone interview was subsequently carried out to record possible late side effects and postprocedural complications.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Tolerability to the procedure was evaluated by means of an 11-point (0 to 10) numeric rating scale of the pain experienced. Postprocedural fever, pelvic infections, peritonitis, hemorrhage were recorded.

RESULT(S)

Of 660 patients who completed the examination, 483 (73.2%) completed the telephone follow-up after a period of 14.7 +/- 9.9 months from the procedure. The mean patient age was 34.5 +/- 4.3 years, and mean infertility duration was 28.1 +/- 23.2 months. The mean numeric rating scale was 2.7 +/- 2.5, and 10 patients (2.0%) required postprocedural drug treatment for pain relief. Mild vasovagal reactions were experienced in 20 cases (4.1%), and four patients (0.8%) had a severe vasovagal reaction. No late complications were reported. No patients required hospital admission after the procedure.

CONCLUSION(S)

In our series, HyCoSy was a well-tolerated examination with a very low rate of side effects and no late complications that required no atropine or anti-inflammatory drugs. These data support the safety of HyCoSy when performed as described, but further work is needed to estimate the rate of late complications and side effects in other settings.

The validity of air and saline hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in tubal patency investigation before insemination treatment

OBJECTIVE

To compare the prognostic significance of tubal patency investigation by means of laparoscopy, hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) with air and saline as a contrast medium, and hysterosalpingography (HSG) in relation to the outcome of intrauterine insemination (IUI) treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of 559 consecutive women attending the university hospital infertility clinic for infertility treatment in 1996-2003. Tubal patency was evaluated by laparoscopy in 261 women, by HyCoSy in 217 and by HSG in 81 women before insemination treatment. Altogether, 1240 insemination cycles were evaluated and the results were compared in the three study groups.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rates per cycle were 14%, 18% and 18% in the laparoscopic, HyCoSy and HSG groups, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. The cumulative pregnancy rates (mean 2.3 cycles) were 30%, 41% and 38%, respectively, with a significant difference between the study groups. In cases of unilateral patency, cumulative pregnancy rates after two cycles were 18% (laparoscopy), 29% (HyCoSy) and 29% (HSG). The numbers of tubal pregnancies were similar in the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air and saline as a contrast medium is a very cost-effective tubal investigation method as regards selection of subjects for insemination.

Advantages and disadvantages of hysterosonosalpingography in the assessment of the reproductive status of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes

BACKGROUND

Hysterosonosalpingography as a contrast ultrasound method is safer, cheaper and easier to perform than hysterosalpingography in the assessment of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes. Is it feasible for all patients? Which is the main problem in the evaluation of target structures by ultrasound?

METHODS

In a prospective study, 68 patients in the initial stage of the infertility treatment were examined by hysterosonosalpingography using saline NaCl infundibile and Echovist as contrast media. Subsequently, further status of the tubes and uterine cavity was assessed by the "gold standards", laparoscopy and hysteroscopy.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity of hysterosonosalpingography using NaCl infundibile for evaluation of the uterine cavity was 100 and 88.8%, respectively. Negative predictive value was 100% and positive predictive value 97%. Sensitivity and specificity of the method for the assessment of the tubal status was 100 and 66%, respectively, negative predictive value was 100% and positive predictive value was 61%. For the assessment of tubal patency using positive contrast Echovist the method has shown 100% sensibility and negative predictive value again but it reached a specificity of 77% and a positive predictive value of 70%. There were no evident complications during or after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Hysterosonosalpingography is useful in making decisions regarding further procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Uterine cavity evaluation using saline is the method of choice. Tubal patency can be assessed only under ideal sonographic conditions. The method is feasible for early assessment of the reproductive status of uterine cavity and fallopian tubes as a simple, safe and cheap outpatient method prior to any following invasive procedure or even histerosalpingography.

Can ultrasound-based investigations replace laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in infertility?

OBJECTIVES

To compare the use a simplified ultrasound based infertility investigation of the infertile couple with the current use of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Thirty-three infertile couples underwent transvaginal ultrasound and hystero-salpingo-contrast-sonography. A diagnosis was formulated based on the results of the ultrasound investigations, a semen analysis and endocrine parameters. The following day, all subjects underwent a laparoscopic chromotubation and hysteroscopy by a surgeon unaware of the ultrasound findings. A diagnosis based on the findings at laparoscopy and hysteroscopy, the same semen analysis and endocrine parameters, was then made. The two diagnoses were compared.

RESULTS

A 90.9% agreement was found between the diagnoses made from the two methods used. When considering laparoscopic diagnosis the Gold Standard of tubal patency, the sensitivity to diagnose occluded tubes using hystero-contrast-sonography was 92.8%. The corresponding figures for specificity, PPV and NPV were 96.2%, 92.8% and 98.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple, ultrasound based approach to investigate the infertile couple, can be used effectively as an initial examination modality during the couple's work-up. However, there is a need for a larger study to confirm these results.