Testicular sperm extraction: impact of testicular histology on outcome, number of biopsies to be performed and optimal time for repetition

Improved phenotypic classification of male infertility to promote discovery of genetic causes

An increasing number of genes are being described in the context of non-syndromic male infertility. Linking the underlying genetic causes of non-syndromic male infertility with clinical data from patients is important to establish new genotype-phenotype correlations. This process can be facilitated by using universal nomenclature, but no standardized vocabulary is available in the field of non-syndromic male infertility. The International Male Infertility Genomics Consortium aimed at filling this gap, providing a standardized vocabulary containing nomenclature based on the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO). The "HPO tree" was substantially revised compared with the previous version and is based on the clinical work-up of infertile men, including physical examination and hormonal assessment. Some causes of male infertility can already be suspected based on the patient's clinical history, whereas in other instances, a testicular biopsy is needed for diagnosis. We assembled 49 HPO terms that are linked in a logical hierarchy and showed examples of morphological features of spermatozoa and testicular histology of infertile men with identified genetic diagnoses to describe the phenotypes. This work will help to record patients' phenotypes systematically and facilitate communication between geneticists and andrologists. Collaboration across institutions will improve the identification of patients with the same phenotypes, which will promote the discovery of novel genetic causes for non-syndromic male infertility.

Outcomes and predictive factors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed classic TESE: results from a multicenter cross-sectional study

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) has been proposed as a salvage treatment option for men with a previously failed classic TESE (cTESE), but data are scarce. We aimed to assess the outcome of and potential predictors of successful salvage mTESE in a cohort of men previously submitted to unfruitful cTESE. Data from 61 men who underwent mTESE after a failed cTESE between 01/2014 and 10/2020, at 6 tertiary-referral centres in Italy were analysed. All men were investigated with semen analyses, testicular ultrasound, hormonal and genetic blood testing. Pathological diagnosis from TESE was collected in every man. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used to investigate potential predictors of positive sperm retrieval (SR+) after salvage mTESE. Baseline serum Follicle-Stimulating hormone (FSH) and total testosterone levels were 17.2 (8.6-30.1) mUI/mL and 4.7 (3.5-6.4) ng/mL, respectively. Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (SCOS), maturation arrest (MA) and hypospermatogenesis were found in 24 (39.3%), 21 (34.4%) and 16 (26.2%) men after cTESE, respectively. At mTESE, SR+ was found in 30 (49.2%) men. Patients with a diagnosis of hypospermatogenesis had a higher rate of SR+ (12/16 (75%)) compared to MA (12/21 (57.1%)) and SCOS (6/24 (25%)) patients at mTESE (p < 0.01). No clinical and laboratory differences were observed between SR+ and SR- patients at mTESE. There were no significant complications after mTESE. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, only hypospermatogenesis (OR 9.5; p < 0.01) was independently associated with SR+ at mTESE, after accounting for age and FSH.In conclusion, salvage mTESE in NOA men with previous negative cTESE was safe and promoted SR+ in almost 50%. A baseline pathology of hypospermatogenesis at cTESE emerged as the only independent predictor of positive outcomes at salvage mTESE.

Is testicular microdissection the only way to retrieve sperm for non-obstructive azoospermic men?

Men presenting with non-obstructive azoospermia are the most challenging clinical scenario for an infertile couple. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) with testicular sperm retrieval gave a chance for biological fatherhood once sperm can be found, but unfortunately sperm recovery rate (SSR) is something near 50%, leading to a discussion about what surgical retrieval technique is the best. Historically sperm have been retrieved using conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction (c-TESE), Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA), a combination of Testicular Fine Needle Aspiration (TfNA)/c-TESE, Testicular Microdissection (TM) and Open Testicular Mapping (OTEM). c-TESE published in 1995 by Devroey and cols. consists of testis delivery, a large unique albuginea incision and extraction of a portion from the majority of testicular tubules. TESA published in 1996 by Lewin and cols. is done percutaneously using a 21–23 gauge needle and a syringe to aspire testicular tubules. TfNA was published in 1965 by Obrant and Persson as an aspiration biopsy and cytological exam to verify sperm production. In 1999 Turek and cols. published the use of TfNA combined with c-TESE for sperm retrieval. In 1999, Peter Schlegel published a technique using a microsurgical approach to identify more probable sperm production areas inside the testicle that could be excised with better precision and less tissue. OTEM is a multiple biopsy approach, published in 2020 by Vieira and cols., based on TfNA principles but done at the same time without albuginea opening or surgical microscope need. Since Testicular Microdissection publication, the method became the gold standard for sperm retrieval, allowing superior SSR with minimal tissue removal, but the amount of testicular dissection to find more probable spermatogenesis areas, difficulties in comparative design studies, diversity TM results among doctors and other methods that can achieve very similar results we question TM superiority. The objective is review existing literature and discuss advantages and disadvantages of all the methods for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Evaluation of cell-free seminal mRNA for the diagnosis of obstruction as the cause of azoospermia in infertile men: A prospective cohort study

Differentiating obstructive (OA) from non-obstructive (NOA) azoospermia is clinically important in managing infertile men. Classically, the differentiation has been based on clinical, hormonal and histological analysis. Histological tests are invasive and may miss spermatogenic areas. Seminal fluid can serve as a medium to assess the status of spermatogenesis and presence or absence of certain markers can help diagnosing and differentiating azoospermia. We evaluated the role of cell-free seminal markers: DDX4, PRM1 and PRM2 in diagnosing and differentiating between OA and NOA and classifying their subtypes. We observed DDX4 was more sensitive for NOA compared with OA. Among various subtypes of NOA, DDX4 positivity was higher in patients with maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis compared with Sertoli cell only syndrome. PRM1 and PRM2 had very low positivity rate for any meaningful comparison. Seminal cell-free markers can serve as non-invasive tests in diagnosing and differentiating etiologies of azoospermia but their validity needs to be proved in long-term trials with more refined molecular techniques.

Does testicular sperm retrieval adversely impact spermatogenesis over the long-term?

Testicular sperm retrieval (TSR) techniques are valuable in the context of severe idiopathic male factor infertility; however, there are few studies in the literature examining the long-term impact of TSR on testicular function. The objective was to determine whether testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) worsens the pre-existing spermatogenesis deficiency in men with either cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. The study population consisted of 145 men with either cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia that underwent TESA or micro-TESE and had long-term post-operative semen analyses (SA). Patients with SA prior to and following TSR were included (n = 24). Amongst them, 16 men underwent TESA and 8 underwent micro-TESE. The follow-up SA was obtained at a mean of 3.0 ± 2.0 years following TSR (range: 0.3-8.3 years) amongst all participants. The post-operative semen parameters in the TESA group were similar to the pre-intervention parameters (p > 0.1). Similarly, the micro-TESE cohort did not demonstrate significant alterations in semen parameters post-intervention (p > 0.05). None of the men in the study became azoospermic following the TSR. Our study indicates TESA or micro-TESE do not appear to worsen the pre-existing spermatogenesis deficiencies in cryptozoospermic and oligozoospermic men over a long-term period. Larger studies are required to corroborate these findings.

Repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Outcome and predictive factors

Objective

To assess the feasibility of repeated sperm recovery in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), as little is known about the extraction rate in repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) in these patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 134 men with NOA had their first sperm recovery between January 2013 and February 2020. Repeated microTESE had been done mostly for patients with a successful initial retrieval.

Results

In the 323 procedures performed on the 134 men with NOA, sperm could be retrieved in 236 procedures (73.1%). A total of 88, 61 and 40 men underwent two, three and four sperm retrievals, respectively. In these cycles, sperm could be extracted in 65 (73.9%), 53 (86.9%) and 37 (92.5%) men, respectively. During the first microTESE procedure, sperm could be extracted in 81 (60.4%) men with NOA. In all, the success rate was significantly different between subgroups, showing highest rate in hypospermatogenesis cases (95.6%), followed by maturation arrest (58.5%), and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (56.0%). However, this difference was not significant at the third and fourth repeated microTESE. The FSH levels and testicular volume were among the noticeable factors affecting success of sperm retrieval. The duration between the first and second biopsies significantly increased the success rate by a factor of 1.3-fold/month; however, afterwards, the duration did not play any role in the success of microTESE. The success of previous trial significantly increased the probability of success by 10.1-fold in the second trial, 5.6-fold in the third trial, and 16.5 folds in the fourth.

Conclusion

Repeated MD -TESE ensures a high sperm recovery rate in patients with NOA. These data also show that when no spermatozoa can be obtained after thawing cryopreserved testicular sperm for ICSI in NOA patients, a repeat microTESE procedure can be planned.

Abbreviations

ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilisation; MA: maturation arrest; (N)OA: (non-)obstructive azoospermia; OR: odds ratio; SCOS, Sertoli cell-only syndrome; SRR: spermatozoa retrieval rate; (micro)TESE: (microdissection) testicular sperm extraction

Fresh vs frozen testicular sperm for assisted reproductive technology in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review

Objective

: To review the debate about the routine use of cryopreserved testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) from patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), as some authors suggest repeating sperm retrieval in such cases due to poorer ICSI results when frozen–thawed testicular sperm is used compared with fresh sperm.

Methods

: A systematic literature review was performed in August 2020 using the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Web of Science databases and the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and we included 26 studies that were considered eligible for this systematic review.

Results

: In all, 1189 publications were screened and 26 articles were included in the systematic review. Three meta-analysis reviews were included and they all concluded that the use of fresh and frozen sperms for ICSI from patients with NOA showed comparable fertilisation and pregnancy rates.

Conclusion

: The use of frozen testicular sperm from men with NOA results in fertilisation and clinical pregnancy rates similar to those of fresh sperm. This may encourage fertility centres to use frozen testicular sperm samples, as this policy has certain advantages that would help with organising their workflow.

Abbreviations: CPR: clinical pregnancy rate; 2PN%: two pronuclei % fertilisation rate; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; NOA: non-obstructive azoospermia; OA, obstructive azoospermia; SCO: Sertoli cell-only syndrome; (micro-)TESE: (microsurgical) testicular sperm extraction

Bilateral versus unilateral cryptorchidism in nonobstructive azoospermia: Testicular sperm extraction outcomes

Cryptorchidism is one of the most frequent causes of nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) in adulthood. Although it is well known that spermatogenesis is more impaired in bilateral than in unilateral cryptorchidism, previous studies have only described small cohorts or inhomogeneous population. Consequently, we analyzed a cohort of 225 men with only a history of cryptorchidism as sole etiopathogenetic factor for NOA, and compared testicular sperm extraction (TESE) outcomes between men with bilateral versus unilateral cryptorchidism. Our results show no difference in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels and testicular volumes between men with a history of bilateral cryptorchidism compared to unilateral cryptorchidism (median: 21.3 IU l⁻¹vs 19.3 IU l⁻¹, P = 0.306; and 7.2 ml vs 7.9 ml, P = 0.543, respectively). In addition, sperm retrieval rates were similar (66.2% vs 60.0%, P = 0.353). Using multivariate analysis, we have found that only a low inhibin B level (above the assay's detection limit) was positively associated with successful sperm retrieval (P < 0.05). Regarding intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes, we found that cumulative pregnancy rate and live birth rate per cycle were not statistically different between the two groups (17.4% vs 27.8%, P = 0.070; and 16.1% vs 26.4%, P = 0.067, respectively). Unexpectedly, there was no significant difference in hormonal profiles (FSH, luteinizing hormone [LH], testosterone, and inhibin B levels) and TESE outcomes between unilateral versus bilateral cryptorchidism. This suggests that a history of unilateral cryptorchidism could reflect a bilateral testicular impairment. Interestingly, inhibin B level might be a predictor of successful TESE.

Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Factor affecting sperm retrieval rate (SRR) or pregnancy rates (PR) after testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) have not been systematically evaluated. In addition, although micro-TESE (mTESE) has been advocated as the gold standard for sperm retrieval in men with NOA, its superiority over conventional TESE (cTESE) remains conflicting.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective was to perform a meta-analysis of the currently available studies comparing the techniques of sperm retrieval and to identify clinical and biochemical factors predicting SRR in men with NOA. In addition, PRs and live birth rates (LBRs), as derived from subjects with NOA post-ICSI, were also analysed as secondary outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

An extensive Medline, Embase and Cochrane search was performed. All trials reporting SRR derived from cTESE or mTESE in patients with NOA and their specific determinants were included. Data derived from genetic causes of NOA or testicular sperm aspiration were excluded.

OUTCOMES

Out of 1236 studies, 117 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study, enrolling 21 404 patients with a mean age (± SD) of 35.0 ± 2.7 years. cTESE and mTESE were used in 56 and 43 studies, respectively. In addition, 10 studies used a mixed approach and 8 studies compared cTESE with mTESE approach. Overall, a SRR per TESE procedure of 47[45;49]% (mean percentage [95% CI]) was found. No differences were observed when mTESE was compared to cTESE (46[43;49]% for cTESE versus 46[42;49]% for mTESE). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that SRR per cycle was independent of age and hormonal parameters at enrolment. However, the SRR increased as a function of testis volume. In particular, by applying ROC curve analysis, a mean testis volume higher than 12.5 ml predicted SRR >60% with an accuracy of 86.2% ± 0.01. In addition, SRR decreased as a function of the number of Klinefelter's syndrome cases included (S = -0.02[-0.04;-0.01]; P < 0.01. I = 0.12[-0.05;0.29]; P = 0.16). Information on fertility outcomes after ICSI was available in 42 studies. Overall, a total of 1096 biochemical pregnancies were reported (cumulative PR = 29[25;32]% per ICSI cycle). A similar rate was observed when LBR was analysed (569 live births with a cumulative LBR = 24[20;28]% per ICSI cycle). No influence of male and female age, mean testis volume or hormonal parameters on both PR and LBR per ICSI cycle was observed. Finally, a higher PR per ICSI cycle was observed when the use of fresh sperm was compared to cryopreserved sperm (PR = 35[30;40]%, versus 20[13;29]% respectively): however, this result was not confirmed when cumulative LBR per ICSI cycle was analysed (LBR = 30[20;41]% for fresh versus 20[12;31]% for cryopreserved sperm).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This analysis shows that cTESE/mTESE in subjects with NOA results in SRRs of up to 50%, with no differences when cTESE was compared to mTESE. Retrieved sperms resulted in a LBR of up to 28% ICSI cycle. Although no difference between techniques was found, to conclusively clarify if one technique is superior to the other, there is a need for a sufficiently powered and well-designed randomized controlled trial to compare mTESE to cTESE in men with NOA.

Open testicular mapping: A less invasive multiple biopsy approach for testicular sperm extraction

This study proposes a testicular sperm extraction technique that was inspired by testicular fine-needle aspiration. Here, we have described the technique of open testicular mapping (OTEM) and evaluated the successful sperm recovery in 92 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). All patients underwent an OTEM biopsy. Patients were divided into two groups; group I included men with spermatozoa recovered and group 0 included men without spermatozoa recovered. Age, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level and testicular volume were compared between the groups. In 50 of 92 men (54%), viable spermatozoa were found after OTEM. No differences were noted in age, FSH level or testicular volume. Using OTEM, it was possible to retrieve spermatozoa in 54% of the NOA men.

Does varicocelectomy improve semen in men with azoospermia and clinically palpable varicocele?

The effectiveness of varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermia is controversial. The current study assessed the efficacy of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermic men with palpable varicocele and to evaluate predictive parameters of outcome. We reviewed the records of 723 patients who had microsurgical varicocelectomy and diagnostic testicular biopsy between 2012 and 2016 at a tertiary medical centre. Data pertaining to the physical, laboratory (semen analysis and hormonal profile) and histopathology features were examined, exploring the predictors of improvement in semen analysis post-varicocelectomy. In total, 42 patients with mean age 35.71 ± 6.35 years were included. After a mean varicocelectomy follow-up of 6.7 months, motile spermatozoa in the ejaculate could be observed in 11 patients (26.2). Out of all the factors examined, only testicular histopathology significantly predicted post-varicocelectomy outcome, where 8/11 patients exhibited hypospermatogenesis, and 3/11 Sertoli cell-only regained spermatozoa in semen. Microsurgical varicocelectomy in nonobstructive azoospermic men with clinically palpable varicocele can result in sperm appearance in the ejaculate with the highest success expected in hypospermatogenesis.

Results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed with sperm retrieved by microscopic testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic patients

OBJECTIVE

The absence of any sperm in the ejaculate is called azoospermia and it is detected in 1% of males and 10-15% of those with infertility complaints. Azoospermia may be due to obstructive (OA) and non-obstructive (NOA) causes. Today, healthy pregnancies can be achieved in azoospermic patients by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) performed using sperm retrieved from microscopic testicular sperm extraction (m-TESE). In this study, we examined the sperm retrieval rates with m-TESE in azoospermic patients, the results of ICSI in OA and NOA patients with sperm and the underlying testicular pathologies in patients without sperm.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients who underwent m-TESE at IVF unit of our hospital between January 2005 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 342 azoospermic patients (117 OA and 225 NOA cases) with regular follow-up were included in the study. In these cases, sperm retrieval and clinical pregnancy rates after ICSI were compared.

RESULTS

In the m-TESE procedure, motile sperm was found in all of the OA patients and in 52.4% (118/225) of the NOA patients. Clinical pregnancy rate in the OA group was 29.9% (35/117) and live birth rate was 25.6% (30/117). In the NOA group, the clinical pregnancy rate was 27.1% (32/118) and the live birth rate was 23.7% (27/118). Histopathologic evaluation was made in 107 cases in the NOA group with no testicular sperm, revealing that 59 cases with germ-cell aplasia (sertoli-cell only syndrome), 42 cases with maturation arrest, and 6 cases with hypospermatogenesis. Postoperative hematoma developed in 3 of m-TESE cases and subsided with conservative treatment.

CONCLUSION

If motile sperm is retrieved with m-TESE application in azoospermic patients, pregnancy resulting in one live birth in about 4 couples who undergo ICSI application can be achieved. In the presence of motile sperm, live birth rates are similar between OA and NOA case with very low complication rates.

Testicular Damage following Testicular Sperm Retrieval: A Ram Model Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible development of histological abnormalities such as fibrosis and microcalcifications after sperm retrieval in a ram model. Fourteen testicles in nine rams were exposed to open biopsy, multiple TESAs, or TESE, and the remaining four testicles were left unoperated on as controls. Three months after sperm retrieval, the testicles were removed, fixed, and cut into 1/2 cm thick slices and systematically put onto a glass plate exposing macroscopic abnormalities. Tissue from abnormal areas was cut into 3 μm sections and stained for histological evaluation. Pathological abnormalities were observed in testicles exposed to sperm retrieval (≥11 of 14) compared to 0 of 4 control testicles. Testicular damage was found independently of the kind of intervention used. Therefore, cryopreservation of excess sperm should be considered while retrieving sperm.

Salvage micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction; outcome in men with non-obstructive azoospermia with previous failed sperm retrievals

OBJECTIVE

To assess the outcome of micro-dissection testicular exploration sperm extraction (m-TESE) as a salvage treatment in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) in whom no sperm was previously found on single/multiple TESE or testicular sperm aspiration (TESA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 58 men with NOA underwent m-TESE. All the patients had previously undergone either single/multiple TESE or TESA with no sperm found. All the patients underwent an m-TESE using a standard technique. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and histopathological diagnosis were examined as predictive factors for sperm recovery. All patients underwent preoperative genetic screening. One patient was found to have an azoospermic factor c (AZFc) micro-deletion and five were diagnosed with Kleinfelter's syndrome.

RESULTS

The mean (range) patient age was 39.0 (26-57) years. Spermatozoa were successfully retrieved in 27 men by m-TESE (46.5%). The mean (range) FSH level was 19.4 (1.6-58.5) IU/L. There was no correlation in age (mean age retrieved 38.1 years, not retrieved 39.7 years, P = 0.38), FSH levels (mean FSH retrieved 21.4 IU/L, not retrieved 17.7 IU/L, P = 0.3) and the ability to find sperm by m-TESE. However, there was a significant difference in testosterone levels and sperm retrieval (mean testosterone retrieved 14.99 nmol/L, not retrieved 11.39 nmol/L, P < 0.05). Patients with a diagnosis of Sertoli-cell-only (SCO) syndrome [14/35 (40%)] and maturation arrest [four of 11 (36%)] had lower sperm retrieval rates than those in the hypospermatogenesis group [nine of 12 (75.0%)] (P < 0.05). There were no significant complications after m-TESE.

CONCLUSIONS

In men with NOA who have undergone previous attempts at sperm retrieval with negative results, a salvage m-TESE offers a significant chance of finding sperm even in SCO syndrome. There does seem to be a correlation between preoperative testosterone levels and the ability to successfully find sperm.

Surgical management of nonobstructive azoospermia

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is characterized by the complete absence of sperm in the ejaculate due to testicular failure. The evaluation and management of patients with NOA offer a challenge to the reproductive urologist. In the era of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection, surgical sperm extraction techniques can afford men with NOA biologic paternity. To provide a comprehensive review of surgical sperm retrieval approaches in the patient with NOA emphasizing complications, success rates and outcome optimization, a Medline search was conducted querying surgical approaches used to manage NOA. Four sperm extraction techniques are described including: testicular sperm aspiration, testicular sperm extraction, fine needle aspiration mapping and microdissection testicular sperm extraction. In addition, the roles for pre-extraction varicocelectomy and sperm cryopreservation are discussed. The management of NOA continues to evolve as newer tools become available. Several modalities of sperm acquisition exist. An understanding of their complications and success rates is fundamental to the treatment of NOA.

In cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia is sperm freezing useful?

Background

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) is an Assisted Reproduction Technique (ART) which offers the chance to conceive to patients presenting very low sperm counts (cryptozoospermia/severe oligozoospermia). Sperm freezing before the oocyte pick-up, can prevent from a lack of spermatozoa on the day of the ICSI. It can avoid the cancellation of the ICSI or the use of TESE (Testicular sperm extraction). The objective of this study was to analyse the practice of sperm freezing for these patients in our center over 8 years and the rate of use of these frozen sperms. We also compared the outcome of ICSIs with frozen versus ejaculated sperm.

Material and methods

We performed a retrospective epidemiological study between 2004 and 2011. We recruited all the patients having a sperm count below 1 Million/mL and who were waiting for their first ICSI attempt.

Results

169 patients were recruited: 84 cryopreserved their sperm before the ICSI (secured ICSI) while 85 did not (non-secured ICSI). Both groups were split in cryptozoospermia (<10³ spermatozoa/ml): 19 and 17 patients respectively, very severe oligozoospermia (10³–10⁵/ml): 37 and 13 patients, and severe oligozoospermia (10⁵–10⁶/ml): 28 and 55 patients. The part of secured ICSI significantly increased from 29% during 2004–2007 to 74% during 2008–2011(p = 0.0029) and the frozen sperm was used in 5.9% of the cases. Median age was significantly higher in the non secured ICSI group (33.57 vs 35.52 for men, p = 0.0069 and 30.45 vs 32.26 for women, p = 0.025) but no significant difference was found in the outcome of the ICSI between frozen-thawed sperm and fresh ejaculated sperm.

Conclusion

Sperm freezing before ICSI for severe oligozoospermic and cryptozoospermic patients significantly increased in our practice but the rate of use remain very low. This encourages to define more accurate criteria leading to sperm freezing.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2051-4190-24-15) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Sperm retrieval and quality evaluation

Technical refinements in sperm retrieval methods and the application of advanced reproductive technologies (ART) using surgically retrieved sperm have enabled biological paternity in azoospermic men who were considered untreatable 20 years ago. Achievement of optimal reproductive outcomes in these patients benefits greatly from a multistep, interdisciplinary process of sperm acquisition that involves reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, or other specialists in male subfertility, and laboratory personnel with expertise in characterizing and isolating sperm from surgically retrieved specimens. The critical steps in this process are discussed in this chapter.

Azoospermia due to spermatogenic failure

This article summarizes the current literature regarding azoospermia caused by spermatogenic failure. The causes and genetic contributions to spermatogenic failure are reviewed. Medical therapies including use of hormonal manipulation, whether guided by a specific abnormality or empiric, to induce spermatogenesis are discussed. The role of surgical therapy, including a discussion of varicocelectomy in men with spermatogenic failure, as well as an in-depth review of surgical sperm retrieval with testicular sperm extraction and microdissection testicular sperm extraction, is provided. Finally, future directions of treatment for men with spermatogenic failure are discussed, namely, stem cell and gene therapy.

Office-based sperm retrieval for treatment of infertility

This article describes sperm retrieval procedures that may be performed in an office setting. Indications for sperm retrieval, preprocedural preparation, and anesthetic considerations are discussed. Vasal sperm aspiration, percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular sperm aspiration, conventional, and microdissection testicular sperm extraction are reviewed. Success and complication rates as well as factors that may influence success (histopathology, cancerous cause, Klinefelter syndrome, Y microdeletions, varicocele, and hormone administration) are reviewed.

[In search of the surgical sperm cell: do we have to perform a testicular biopsy systematically?]

INTRODUCTION

Testicular biopsies are diagnostic and therapeutic tools involved in male infertility care. However, this surgery is invasive and not systematically successful. We studied the preoperative clinical and hormonal factors allowing to predict the obtaining of sperm cells.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 209 patients who all had a testicular biopsy for procreation medically assisted (PMA). The studied criteria were: the age at the time of the surgery, the male cause of the infertility, the testicular volume, the tobacco smoking exposure, the concentrations of estradiol, FSH, LH, prolactin, and testosterone. The comparison of both groups (successful biopsy versus failed biopsy) was made in bivariate analysis then in multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The testicular volume average and the cause were the two only factors which had a real influence on the negativity of the biopsy. In it was added in bivariate analysis a statistically significant correlation of the smoking exposure and the FSH with the failed biopsy.

DISCUSSION

The existence of these factors, and their accumulation, was strongly predictive of a failure of the biopsy. However, we found germ cells in patients exposed to the studied factors, letting think that it is systematically necessary to propose the surgery at the risk of a limited profit.

Selection of Individual Testicular Tubules From Biopsied Testicular Tissue With a Stereomicroscope Improves Sperm Retrieval Rate1

The present study describes a new modification for testicular sperm extraction (TESE) with an intraoperative surgical loop, coupled with stereomicroscopic dissection in the laboratory, to identify sperm-containing tubules. The study included 116 consecutive patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing TESE and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. After dissection of testicular tissue under the stereomicroscope, patients were separated into 2 groups according to tubular diameter. In the first group (n = 72), all tubules were of the same diameter. In the second group (n = 44), tubules with variable diameters could be identified. In such cases, 1-2 of the most distended and opaque seminiferous tubules were selected and minced alone, then examined for the presence of spermatozoa. The rest of the testicular tissue suspension was minced and examined separately. In 11 (25%) cases, retrieved spermatozoa were found in the isolated distended tubules only. In 21 (47.7%) cases, spermatozoa were found in both the isolated distended tubules and the rest of the specimen. In 2 cases, spermatozoa were found only in the whole sample, not in the isolated tubules. In the remaining 10 cases, spermatozoa were not found in either the whole sample or the isolated tubules. The sperm recovery rate in the isolated tubules was significantly higher than that of the rest of the specimen (72.7% vs 52%, chi(2) = 3.93, P <.05), and larger numbers of spermatozoa could be easily retrieved in a shorter period of time. In conclusion, the selection and isolation of the most dilated and opaque seminiferous tubules by using the surgical loop, coupled with laboratory stereoscopic dissection, improves sperm retrieval for men with NOA. It is possible that surgical-loops TESE coupled with stereomicroscope may offer superior sperm retrieval when compared with conventional TESE and may also offer reduced operative time when compared with microdissection TESE.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: an update

Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) were once considered to be infertile with few treatment options due to the absence of sperm in the ejaculate. In the last two decades, the advent of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and the application of various testicular sperm retrieval techniques, including fine needle aspiration (FNA), conventional testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) have revolutionized treatment in this group of men. Because most men with NOA will have isolated regions of spermatogenesis within the testis, studies have illustrated that sperm can be retrieved in most men with NOA, including Klinefelter's syndrome (KS), prior history of chemotherapy and cryptorchidism. Micro-TESE, when compared with conventional TESE has a higher sperm retrieval rate (SRR) with fewer postoperative complications and negative effects on testicular function. In this article, we will compare the efficacy of the different procedures of sperm extraction, discuss the medical treatment and the role of testosterone optimization in men with NOA and describe the micro-TESE surgical technique. Furthermore, we will update our overall experience to allow counseling on the prognosis of sperm retrieval for the specific subsets of NOA.

Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility

Evaluation and surgical treatment of male infertility has evolved and expanded, now leading to more precise diagnoses and tailored treatments with diminished morbidity and greater success. Surgeries for male infertility are divided into four major categories: (i) diagnostic surgery; (ii) surgery to improve sperm production; (iii) surgery to improve sperm delivery; and (iv) surgery to retrieve sperm for use with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). While today we are more successful than ever in treating male infertility, pregnancy is still not always achieved likely due to factors that remain poorly understood. Clinicians treating infertility should advocate for couple-based therapy, and require that both partners have a thorough evaluation and an informed discussion before undergoing specific surgical therapies.

Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia

The development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) opened a new era in the field of assisted reproduction and revolutionized the assisted reproductive technology protocols for couples with male factor infertility. Fertilisation and pregnancies can be achieved with spermatozoa recovered not only from the ejaculate but also from the seminiferous tubules. The most common methods for retrieving testicular sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) are testicular sperm aspiration (TESA: needle/fine needle aspiration) and open testicular biopsy (testicular sperm extraction: TESE). The optimal technique for sperm extraction should be minimally invasive and avoid destruction of testicular function, without compromising the chance to retrieve adequate numbers of spermatozoa to perform ICSI. Microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), performed with an operative microscope, is widely considered to be the best method for sperm retrieval in NOA, as larger and opaque tubules, presumably with active spermatogenesis, can be directly identified, resulting in higher spermatozoa retrieval rates with minimal tissue loss and low postoperative complications. Micro-TESE, in combination with ICSI, is applicable in all cases of NOA, including Klinefelter syndrome (KS). The outcomes of surgical sperm retrieval, primarily in NOA patients with elevated serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (NOA including KS patients), are reviewed along with the phenotypic features. The predictive factors for surgical sperm retrieval and outcomes of treatment were analysed. Finally, the short- and long-term complications in micro-TESE in both 46XY males with NOA and KS patients are considered.

Percutaneous biopsy of the testicle: a mini review with a proposal flow chart for non-obstructive azoospermia

A general consensus on the role of testicular biopsy in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is needed. This paper reviews and updates technical aspects and clinical performance of the percutaneous testicular biopsy techniques, in particular large-needle aspiration biopsy (LNAB), and proposes a flow chart for the management of NOA. The English literature and original data were reviewed or analyzed. Large-needle biopsy (LNB) includes large-needle cutting biopsy (LNCB) and large-needle aspiration biopsy (LNAB). LNCB usually requires scrotal incision for the insertion of relatively large needles. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) does not require surgical equipment or expertise, employs the smallest needles (23- to 20-gauge), and permits sperm cytologic detection. LNAB also does not require surgical equipment or expertise, employs needles of size from 20- to 18-gauge, is safe, and can be used for testicular histology and sperm recovery. An operative flow chart is proposed for the management of NOA in which FNAB, LNAB and open surgical biopsy are used for the optimal management of NOA.

[Assessment of azoospermia and histological evaluation of spermatogenesis]

Azoospermia may be obstructive (blockage of the genital ducts) or non-obstructive (a lack of testicular production). The distinction is based on an ensemble of clinical, spermiological, hormonal, ultrasound, genetic and histological data. Azoospermia is the main indication for testicular biopsy for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. Testicular spermatozoids are processed in the reproductive biology laboratory (simultaneously with oocyte retrieval or not) for in vitro fertilization with intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. The histological study of spermatogenesis is usually performed on a testicular biopsy sample taken at the same time and provides additional diagnostic information on infertility. Histological alterations in the testicular tissues are frequently observed in azoospermic men. In non-obstructive azoospermia, three histological situations prevail: hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome and germ cell arrest. One can distinguish between pure forms (in which all the seminiferous tubules have the same appearance) and mixed forms (in which the tubules' aspects are heterogeneous). Hypospermatogenesis is highly prevalent in azoospermia and is characterized by a low, basal level of spermatozoid production. The prevalence of Sertoli-cell-only syndrome varies from 27 to 68% and the mean spermatozoid recovery rate is between 16 and 33%. Germ cell arrests are rare phenotypes and have a poor prognosis for spermatozoid recovery. Overall, histological examination (still the only way to fully describe spermatogenesis) must be qualitative and quantitative, with the adoption of a standardized, universally understood terminology. It is essential to compare the histological data with (i) recovery of testicular spermatozoids, (ii) clinical, ultrasound, hormonal and genetic data and (iii) the outcome of IVF/ICSI procedures.

Predictive factors of repeat sperm aspiration success

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of repeated testicular sperm aspirations (TESAs) and to investigate whether the interval between TESA procedures, success in the first attempt, and patient age might influence the results.

METHODS

The patient population in the present study consisted of couples undergoing TESA for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Of these, 189, 46, 42, and 19 male patients underwent 1, 2, 3, and 4 sperm retrievals, respectively. The effects of the interval between TESA procedures, success of the previous attempts, and patient age on sperm recuperation in a repeated procedure were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the patients with nonobstructive azoospermia from whom sperm was not retrieved in the first procedure, 16.6% had successful sperm retrieval at the second procedure. In 57.1% of the patients who did not achieve sperm recuperation for the second attempt, sperm could be retrieved in the third procedure. Finally, of the patients without success in the third attempt, 40.0% had successful sperm retrieval at the fourth attempt. Success in the preceding TESA procedure positively influenced the success of sperm retrieval in a repeated attempt, and a trend for a negative effect of paternal age in the success of a repeated TESA attempt was noted. However, the interval between procedures had no influence on TESA success.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study have shown that patient age and the success of the first TESA may predict the results of additional attempts. However, TESA may result in sperm recovery even when the first recovery procedure was not successful. Moreover, sperm recovery did not seem to be affected by the interval between procedures.

Fine needle aspiration vs. mTESE in non-obstructive azoospermia

This study was carried out on 100 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) to compare between results and complications of fine needle aspiration (FNA) vs. microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) sperm retrieval. They underwent history taking, clinical examination, semen analysis, serum follicle stimulating hormone estimation and scrotal Duplex. One testis was subjected to FNA screening whereas the other testis was subjected to mTESE and histopathology. Follow-up was by ultrasonography at 1, 3 and 6 months. The overall sperm retrieval rate was 54% by mTESE and 10% by FNA. Spermatozoa were retrieved by mTESE from all cases with hypospermatogenesis, severe hypospermatogenesis, 30% of Sertoli cell only (SCO), 16.7% of germ cell arrest and in 28.6% of tubular hyalinization. Sperms were retrieved by FNA in 33.3% of hypospermatogenesis, 9% in severe hypospermatogenesis, 5% in SCO, 16.7% in germ cell arrest, while no sperms were retrieved in the tubular hyalinization group. The total complication rate following mTESE was 10% in the early phase and none in the long-term follow-up compared to 24% of FNA side. It is concluded that mTESE is superior to FNA as regards sperm retrieval rate and lower incidence of complications in NOA patients.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction and IVF-ICSI outcome in nonobstructive azoospermia

We evaluated the efficiency of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MicroTESE) in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and their pregnancy outcomes in a programme based on in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Fifty-six MicroTESE procedures were performed in 53 patients with NOA. Pre-operative levels of luteinising hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone and prolactin were obtained and a Doppler sonography examination was conducted. Sperm retrieval rate, mean age of female partner, mean ICSI and fertilisation rate, number and quality of embryos transferred, implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were calculated. Samples for testicular histological analysis were taken trans-operatively in every case. Sperm retrieval rate, mean ICSI per case and fertilisation rate were 57.1%, 7.4% and 58.4% respectively. A significant difference in pre-operative testicular volume (P = 0.001), serum FSH (P = 0.008) and total testosterone levels (P = 0.021) was found in patients from whom sperm could be retrieved. Mean 1.9 type A embryos were transferred per cycle. Implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were 20%, 40% and 18.7% respectively. It is concluded that MicroTESE is a viable option for men with NOA, offering excellent results in couples undergoing IVF-ICSI. Pre-operative serum FSH, testicular volume and total testosterone levels may have a prognostic value, although more data are needed to determine their significance and whether or not patients should be excluded from an initial sperm retrieval attempt.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: prediction, outcome, and complications

Testicular spermatozoa can be retrieved successfully by the testicular sperm extraction (TESE) procedure and used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). The successful application of TESE depends on the identification of seminiferous tubules containing spermatozoa; testicular tubules of patients with NOA are usually heterogeneous, and TESE may not always be successful in these patients. Microdissection TESE with an operative microscope is advantageous because larger, more opaque, and whitish tubules, presumably containing germ cells with active spermatogenesis, can be identified directly. This procedure is currently the best method for the certain identification of sperm, resulting in a high spermatozoa retrieval rate and minimal postoperative complications. The present review considers the surgical procedure, outcome, prediction for spermatozoa retrieval, and postoperative complications of microdissection TESE.

Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review

Our objective was to establish which is the best sperm retrieval technique in non-obstructive azoospermia based on the available evidence. To date, no randomized controlled trial has compared the efficiency of these strategies and thus current recommendations are based on cumulative evidence provided by descriptive, observational and controlled studies. Three outcome measures were assessed for the sperm retrieval techniques: sperm retrieval rate (SRR), complications and live birth rate. Twenty-four descriptive studies reporting on the results of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) were encountered. Seven controlled studies that compared microdissection (MD) TESE with conventional TESE and seven controlled studies comparing fine needle testicular aspiration (FNA) with TESE were identified. The mean SRR for TESE was 49.5% (95% CI 49.0-49.9). TESE with multiple biopsies results in a higher SRR than FNA especially in cases of Sertoli-cell-only (SCO) syndrome and maturation arrest. Current evidence suggests that MD performs better than conventional TESE only in cases of SCO where tubules containing active focus of spermatogenesis can be identified. MD appears to be the safest technique regarding post-operative complications followed by FNA. Only three studies could be identified concerning the influence of the sperm retrieval technique on clinical pregnancy and live birth rate, hence no definitive conclusions can be made. However, so far there appears to be no impact of the technique itself on success rates.

Outcome of repeated micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia

AIM

To evaluate the outcome of repetitive micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) attempts in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) cases, in relation to patients' initial testicular histology results.

METHODS

A total of 68 patients with NOA in whom mTESE had been performed in previous intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) attempts were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among the 68 patients with NOA, the first mTESE yielded mature sperm for ICSI in 44 (64%) (Sp(+)), and failed in the remaining 24 (36%) (Sp(-)). Following their first trial, 24 patients decided to undergo a second mTESE. Of these 24 patients, no spermatozoa were obtained in 5 patients, and Sp(+) but no fertilization/pregnancy were achieved in 19. In these 24 cases, mTESE was successively repeated for two (n = 24), three (n = 4) and four (n = 1) times. The second attempt yielded mature sperm in 3/5 patients from the Sp- group and 16/19 patients from the Sp(+) group. At the third and fourth trials, 4/4 and 1/1 of the original Sp(+) patients were Sp(+) again, respectively. Distribution of main testicular histology included Sertoli cell-only syndrome (16%), maturation arrest (22%), hypospermatogenesis (21%) and focal spermatogenesis (41%). Overall, in repetitive mTESE, 24/29 (82%) of the attempts were finally Sp(+).

CONCLUSION

Repeated mTESE in patients with NOA is a feasible option, yielding considerably high sperm recovery rate. In patients with NOA, mTESE may safely be repeated one or more times to increase sperm retrieval rate, as well as to increase the chance of retrieving fresh spermatozoa to enable ICSI.

Single tubule biopsy: a new objective microsurgical advancement for testicular sperm retrieval in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to measure the diameter of seminiferous tubules (ST) during microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE) using a micrometer fixed to one of the eyepieces of the operating microscope to find a correlation between the extracted ST diameter and TESE outcome.

DESIGN

A prospective comparative study.

SETTING

Adam International Andrology and Infertility Clinic, Giza, Egypt.

PATIENT(S)

Two hundred sixty-four patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) were included.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients underwent TESE using the open surgical technique. The STs were measured using the micrometer, and the tubule with the largest diameter was excised and freshly examined under an inverted microscope. If no spermatozoa were found, another sample was taken from the second most dilated tubule area and then at random until sperm were found or a maximum six samples were harvested. If no spermatozoa were detected, the contralateral testis was operated upon.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The TESE outcome in relation to ST diameter.

RESULT(S)

The total sperm recovery rate was 105 out of 264 (39.8%). When ST measured >or=300 microm the sperm retrieval rate was 16 out of 19 (84.2%). When ST diameter was <300 microm, the sperm retrieval rate was 36.3% (89 out of 245).

CONCLUSION(S)

During microdissection TESE, the best cutoff level of the ST diameter for harvesting testicular spermatoza is 110 microm with sensitivity 86.0% and specificity 74.4% (AUC 0.653, 95% confidence interval 0.608-0.663). When ST diameter is 300 microm or more a single tubule biopsy is usually sufficient to harvest enough testicular spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection or sperm freezing with minimal tissue excision.

Testicular sperm retrieval method: histological effects of location of incision

This research was conducted to evaluate the effects of a transverse vs. longitudinal incision for testicular sperm retrieval. Rats were divided into 4 groups: I: control, II: sham operation, III: longitudinal incision TSRM, IV: transverse incision TSRM. Group II (sham operation) had a dissection of left testis/spermatic cord, then closure of wound. Group III underwent dissection of left testis, then a "longitudinal" incision (15 mm long) of testis, which was fully opened then closed again and sutured with 5-0 Vicryl sutures. Group IV underwent dissection of the left testis, opening of the testis with a "transverse" incision, then closure with 5-0 Vicryl. The seminiferous tubule diameter was 0.118-0.224 mm in all groups. Inflammation and abscess formation occurred in one testis each in the sham and longitudinal incision groups, and in two testes in the transverse incision group. There were no differences in histopathology or scoring between the longitudinal and the transverse incision.

Histological evaluation of the human testis--approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: mini review

Testicular biopsy is a crucial assessment in reproductive practice with diagnostic and prognostic importance for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and risk of testicular neoplasia. Endocrine and genetic tests cannot reliably distinguish obstructive azoospermia (OA) from non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) or predict recovery of mature spermatids by testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Currently, divergent histological reporting systems and the use of imprecise terminology seriously degrade the value of the literature on TESE recovery rates and hamper evaluation of treatments and research on genotype-phenotype relationships. The rising incidence of testis cancer and carcinoma in situ (CIS), especially in infertile populations, requires that every effort be made for its early detection. We provide a systematic approach to the histological classification of spermatogenic disorders and detection of CIS in adult patients. We evaluate a large consecutive series of bilateral biopsies from infertile men and report (i) the frequency of bilateral or discordant patterns that supports the use of bilateral biopsy for comprehensive evaluation and (ii) a high prevalence of mixed patterns, particularly within the hypospermatogenesis classification, that helps account for reported success of TESE. We propose a new diagnosis code for testicular biopsies that addresses the needs of ART clinicians and allows data storage and retrieval of value in clinical practice and research.

Salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failed conventional testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE

TESE is considered the best procedure for identifying a tubule for spermatozoa retrieval. This technique improves the SRR to around 50%. However, it has been unclear whether it is useful in patients in whom conventional TESE has failed. We compared the outcome of microdissection TESE in patients in whom conventional TESE failed to that in patients who did not undergo conventional TESE. We also evaluated relations between the outcome of salvage microdissection TESE and the characteristics of previous conventional TESE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 46 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia in whom salvage microdissection TESE was performed after failed conventional TESE were included. Patient characteristics and the SRR were compared between these patients and 134 in whom conventional TESE had not been performed previously. The previous TESE procedure, testicular histology and interval between TESEs were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. The microdissection TESE SRR also did not differ significantly between the groups (45.7% vs 44.0%). The possibility of successful spermatozoa retrieval by salvage microdissection TESE remained regardless of the previous failure of any other TESE procedure and regardless of testicular histology. The salvage microdissection TESE SRR was not related to the interval between TESEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Because salvage microdissection TESE is effective in patients in whom conventional TESE has failed, this option should be made available to them with the understanding that extended followup after salvage microdissection TESE is necessary due to the risk of hypogonadism.

How successful is repeat testicular sperm extraction in patients with azoospermia?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the extraction rate in repeated sperm retrieval procedures in azoospermic patients. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of repeated sperm recovery in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 1066 azoospermic men had their first sperm recovery between 1 January 1995 and 31 December 2003. A total of 381 men had obstructive azoospermia (OA), 628 nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and 57 showed hypospermatogenesis.

RESULTS

Overall, sperm could be retrieved in all procedures in the 598 cycles performed in OA men (100%). A total of 117, 57, 24, 11, 7 and 1 men underwent, respectively, two, three, four, five, six and seven sperm retrievals; all were successful. Of the 784 procedures performed on the 628 men with NOA, sperm could be retrieved in 384 procedures (49%). During the first testicular sperm extraction (TESE) procedure, sperm could be extracted in 261 men with NOA (41.6%). A total of 103 men had a second attempt, 34 had a third attempt, 11 had a fourth attempt, 6 had a fifth attempt and 2 had a sixth attempt. In these cycles, sperm could be extracted in, respectively, 77 (74.7%), 28 (82.3%), 11 (100%), 5 (83.3%) and 2 (100%) men.

CONCLUSION

Repeated TESE ensures a high sperm recovery rate even in patients with NOA. In NOA patients, studies reporting on TESE may therefore overestimate the retrieval rate by reallocating successful patients. These data also show that when no spermatozoa can be obtained after thawing cryopreserved testicular sperm for ICSI in NOA patients, a repeat TESE procedure can be planned.