Different perspectives of patients and health care professionals on the potential benefits and risks of blastocyst culture and multiple embryo transfer

A Bayesian network model for predicting pregnancy after in vitro fertilization

We present a Bayesian network model for predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). The problem is characterized by a particular missingness process; we propose a simple but effective averaging approach which improves parameter estimates compared to the traditional MAP estimation. We present results with generated data and the analysis of a real data set. Moreover, we assess by means of a simulation study the effectiveness of the model in supporting the selection of the embryos to be transferred.

Comparison between Cleavage Stage versus Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfer in an Egyptian Cohort Undergoing in vitro Fertilization: A Possible Role for Laser Assisted Hatching

BACKGROUND

Extended in vitro embryo culture and blastocyst transfer have emerged as essential components of the advanced reproductive technology armamentarium, permitting selection of more advanced embryos considered best suited for transfer.

AIM OF STUDY

The aim of this study was to compare between cleavage stage and blastocyst stage embryo transfer in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and to assess the role of assisted hatching technique in patients undergoing blastocyst transfer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was carried out on two groups. Group I: 110 patients who underwent 120 cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection with day 2-3 embryo transfer-for unexplained infertility or male factor within the previous 3 years. Their data obtained retrospectively from medical records. Group II: 46 age matched infertile female patients undergoing 51 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles for similar causes. Patients in Group II were further subdivided into 2 equal subgroups; Group IIa (23 patients), which had laser assisted hatching and Group IIb (23 patients), which did not have assisted hatching. All patients had an infertility workup including basal hormonal profile, pelvic ultrasound, hysterosalpingogram and/or laparoscope and semen analysis of the patient's partner. All patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: Using long protocol of ovulation induction. Laser assisted hatching was done for blastocysts of 23 patients.

RESULTS

Comparison between both groups as regards the reproductive outcome showed a significant difference in pregnancy and implantation rates, both being higher in group II (P < 0.05) Comparison between both subgroups as regards the reproductive outcome showed a highly significant difference in pregnancy and implantation rates, both being higher in Group IIa (P < 0.01). There was also a significantly higher rate of multiple pregnancies among Group IIa (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Blastocyst transfer is a successful and improved alternative for patients with multiple failed in vitro fertilization attempts, associated with a significant increase in pregnancy and implantation rates. Furthermore, laser assisted hatching increases implantation and clinical pregnancy rates.

Comparing patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer using the attitudes to a twin IVF pregnancy scale (ATIPS)

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated a questionnaire originally developed for use with health professionals to explore and compare patients' and clinicians' perceptions of elective single embryo transfer and twin births.

METHODS

IVF clinicians and patients attending an independent Fertility clinic were surveyed using the Attitudes to a twin birth scale (ATIPS) comprising two subscales: attitudes to twins (A-Twin) and attitudes to elective single embryo transfer (A-SET). After refinement total sample scores showed both subscales were reliable with Cronbach's alpha >0.8 and item-total correlations >0.35.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed by 100 female IVF patients and 17 IVF clinicians. A-Twin subscale scores indicated neither the IVF clinicians nor female IVF patients demonstrated very positive attitudes to a twin birth although the IVF female patients were more in favour (t = 5.29, n = 117, p = <0.001). Responses suggest both groups would benefit from increased information about the risks of a twin birth for the baby. First cycle IVF female patients were significantly more positive about eSET (z = 3.94, n = 100, p =  <0.001). Clinicians perceive both their colleagues' and female patients' negativity towards eSET; suggesting a role for education.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found the ATIPS to be a reliable measure which could be useful in evaluating interventions to promote single embryo transfer.

Attitudes towards single embryo transfer, twin and higher order pregnancies in patients undergoing infertility treatment: a review

The problems associated with twin and higher order pregnancies have assumed major importance, with international debate about multiple pregnancy; the single biggest risk with in vitro fertilisation (IVF). We have critically reviewed published papers on female patients' and their partners' views of single embryo transfer (SET) and twin or higher level pregnancies to identify the requirements needed to improve the acceptability of SET. Twenty relevant papers were identified and included in the review. Although the majority of IVF patients and their partners, in the more recent studies, exhibited a desire for twins rather than singletons, closer examination of the evidence revealed that elective SET (eSET) could become increasingly acceptable. As success rates of IVF have improved and the risks and consequences of multiple pregnancies are well-documented, patients have accepted the transfer of two rather than three embryos as standard practice. However, more would accept eSET if success rates approached those of double embryo transfer (DET). This emphasises the importance of improving success rates of eSET so that more patients can achieve a singleton birth with one IVF cycle. If patients were offered only SET, it is likely that this would be acceptable as the normal expectation of pregnancy is one baby. Measures to improve the acceptability of SET include: using eSET, especially with younger patients; including partners when providing risk information; improving eSET success rates; improving outcomes with cryopreserved embryos; changing reimbursement/free cycles to favour eSET; using legal enforcement.

Top quality embryos at day 2: a prerequisite for single blastocyst transfer? An observational cohort study in women under 36

PURPOSE

While extended culture has been considerably improved, some questions remain regarding the application of Single Blastocyst Transfer (SBT).

METHODS

An observational cohort study was undertaken with 456 women under 36 years old and assigned to SBT on a voluntary basis. The main outcome was the cumulative delivery rate per couple according to the number of Top Quality Embryos (TQE) on day 2 (Group 1= > or =2 TQE, Group 2= 1 TQE and Group 3= 0 TQE).

RESULTS

Rate of transfer and mean number of frozen blastocyts were higher in Group 1 compared to Group 3. As a consequence, the cumulative delivery rate per couple was higher in Group 1 (47.9%) compared to Group 3 (34.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Single blastocyst transfer combining fresh and frozen cycles, might be a worthwhile strategy irrespective of embryo quality on day 2 providing good delivery rates while keeping the rate of multiple deliveries low.

Safety versus success in elective single embryo transfer: women's preferences for outcomes of in vitro fertilisation

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether women waiting to undergo in vitro fertilisation (IVF) view adverse outcomes associated with twin pregnancy as more desirable than having no pregnancy at all.

DESIGN

Women's preference values for five adverse birth outcomes associated with twin pregnancy were compared with their preference value for treatment failure (TF), i.e. no pregnancy at all.

SETTING

Aberdeen Fertility Centre, University of Aberdeen, UK.

POPULATION

A total of 74 women waiting to undergo IVF.

METHODS

The standard gamble method was used to elicit women's preference values for giving birth to a child with physical impairments (PI), cognitive impairments (CI), or visual impairments (VI), perinatal death (PD) without a subsequent pregnancy, premature delivery (PremD), and TF (no pregnancy).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Preference values were elicited on a scale where 1 represents giving birth to a healthy child and 0 represents immediate death.

RESULTS

The median preference values for having a child with PI, CI, or VI were 0.940, 0.970, and 0.975, respectively. The median values for PremD, PD, and TF were 0.955, 0.725, and 0.815, respectively. Having no child at all was valued significantly lower than having a child with PI, CI, or VI (P < 0.01) but significantly higher than PD (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Some women waiting for IVF treatment view severe child disability outcomes associated with double embryo transfer as being more desirable than having no child at all. Women embarking on IVF may be influenced more strongly by considerations of 'treatment success' rather than future risks to their offspring.

Incidence and complications of multiple gestation in Canada: proceedings of an expert meeting

This paper reports the proceedings of a consensus meeting on the incidence and complications of multiple gestation in Canada. In addition to background presentations about current and possible future practice in Canada, the expert panel also developed a set of consensus points. The need for infertility to be understood, and funded, as a healthcare problem was emphasized, along with recognition of the emotional impact of infertility. It was agreed that the goal of assisted reproduction treatment is the delivery of a single healthy infant and that even though many positive outcomes have resulted from twin or even triplet pregnancies, the potential risks associated with multiple pregnancy require that every effort be made to achieve this goal. The evidence shows that treatments other than IVF (such as superovulation and clomiphene citrate) contribute significantly to the incidence of multiple pregnancy. There is an urgent need for studies to understand better the usage and application of these other fertility technologies within Canada, as well as the non-financial barriers to treatment. The final consensus of the expert panel was that with adequate funding and good access to treatment, it will be possible to achieve the goal of reducing IVF-related multiple pregnancy rates in Canada by 50%.

Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies?

It has recently been suggested that the measure of success of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) should be the birth of a singleton baby, whereas a twin pregnancy should be considered as a complication. Although the maternal and neonatal complications in twin pregnancies are significantly higher than those in singleton pregnancies, the classification of a twin pregnancy as a complication of ART is in our opinion debatable. Most twin pregnancies result in the birth of two healthy babies, with little or no complication for the mother, and only few twin pregnancies results in serious morbidity of the mother and of one or both of the children. The crux of our arguments is that one should consider those cases as poor outcomes and not a twin pregnancy per se.

Treatment preferences and trade-offs for ovulation induction in clomiphene citrate–resistant patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate patient preferences and trade-offs for laparoscopic electrocautery of the ovaries relative to ovulation induction with recombinant FSH (rFSH) in patients with clomiphene citrate (CC)-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

DESIGN

Assessment of preferences and trade-offs in a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Thirty-two CC-resistant patients with PCOS who had been randomly assigned to either laparoscopic electrocautery of the ovaries or ovulation induction with rFSH and 32 control patients with PCOS under treatment with CC.

INTERVENTION(S)

Preference for laparoscopic electrocautery relative to rFSH was established during an interview. Trade-offs between treatment burden and effectiveness were evaluated by varying hypothetical pregnancy rates after laparoscopic electrocautery until patients switched in their initial preference.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Preference for laparoscopic electrocautery of the ovaries; trade-off between burden and effectiveness of treatment.

RESULT(S)

The majority of the patients would prefer electrocautery of the ovaries over ovulation induction with rFSH if both treatment strategies resulted in similar pregnancy rates. However, most patients were willing to trade off their preference for increased effectiveness: the percentage of patients who preferred electrocautery over rFSH sharply declined when the difference in hypothetical pregnancy rates was more than 5% in favor of rFSH.

CONCLUSION(S)

Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome are well able to express an informed preference for laparoscopic electrocautery of the ovaries or ovulation induction with rFHS. Preferences are guided by features of the respective treatments but seem to be dominated by their effectiveness and safety.

Investigation of staff and patients’ opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer

BACKGROUND

In the context of mounting concern about the risks of twin pregnancies resulting from IVF, this study aimed to assess staff and patients' attitudes towards a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) of elective single embryo transfer (SET) in a Scottish fertility centre.

METHODS

The views of 10 members of IVF clinic staff were assessed by means of a focus group and those of 12 couples by semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Staff were aware of the risks of twin pregnancies to mothers and babies and the need for evidence of success in SET, but had reservations about the proposed RCT. The need to subject patients to unpopular scientific procedures such as randomization and blinding conflicted with their perceived caring role. They felt it would be hard to recruit and onerous to patients but nevertheless discussed how it could be successfully mounted if necessary. They debated how to ensure that consent was fully informed, and when, and how, to randomize. Patients accepted the possibility of twins but were largely unaware of risks inherent in twin pregnancies. They saw no need for a trial and found the idea of randomization unacceptable except in younger women. They would accept SET if it became unit policy and appeared unaffected by financial considerations.

CONCLUSIONS

Involving affected staff at the design stage may make it easier to conduct a SET trial in their clinics. IVF patients whose ultimate goal is pregnancy are less likely to support a trial which aims to minimize twin pregnancies.

Prevention of triplets and higher order multiples: trends in reproductive medicine

In the United States and throughout the world, today's healthcare providers are challenged by the risks of multiple gestation pregnancy. Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) often used to treat infertility raise ethical issues including informed consent, veracity, and nonmalificence. In the United States, there is the need to improve maternal and fetal/neonatal mortality and morbidity by proposing legislation regulating ART and supporting single embryo transfers with no more than 2 such transfers. Beginning with the diagnosis of infertility, providers have a responsibility to educate, inform, and treat infertile couples. From the moment pregnancy with multiples is confirmed, these families are faced with incredible stressors including decision making on multifetal or selective reduction. Full disclosure of risks involved throughout the course of care should be discussed and documented in the record and plan of care. Currently in the United States, legislation does not regulate ART, including ovulation induction/enhancement and in vitro fertilization. Although the United States does have self-regulation via limited reporting through their professional organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an unlimited number of embryos may be transferred. Unfortunately, many healthcare providers have not recognized the responsibility and burden placed on families and society as a whole. Lack of regulation means women may become pregnant with high order multiples, which raises serious moral and ethical issues.

Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal

This review considers the value of single embryo transfer (SET) to prevent multiple pregnancies (MP) after IVF/ICSI. The incidence of MP (twins and higher order pregnancies) after IVF/ICSI is much higher (approximately 30%) than after natural conception (approximately 1%). Approximately half of all the neonates are multiples. The obstetric, neonatal and long-term consequences for the health of these children are enormous and costs incurred extremely high. Judicious SET is the only method to decrease this epidemic of iatrogenic multiple gestations. Clinical trials have shown that programmes with >50% of SET maintain high overall ongoing pregnancy rates ( approximately 30% per started cycle) while reducing the MP rate to <10%. Experience with SET remains largely European although the need to reduce MP is accepted worldwide. An important issue is how to select patients suitable for SET and embryos with a high putative implantation potential. The typical patient suitable for SET is young (aged <36 years) and in her first or second IVF/ICSI trial. Embryo selection is performed using one or a combination of embryo characteristics. Available evidence suggests that, for the overall population, day 3 and day 5 selection yield similar results but better than zygote selection results. Prospective studies correlating embryo characteristics with documented implantation potential, utilizing databases of individual embryos, are needed. The application of SET should be supported by other measures: reimbursement of IVF/ICSI (earned back by reducing costs), optimized cryopreservation to augment cumulative pregnancy rates per oocyte harvest and a standardized format for reporting results. To make SET the standard of care in the appropriate target group, there is a need for more clinical studies, for intensive counselling of patients, and for an increased sense of responsibility in patients, health care providers and health insurers.

Should we advise patients undergoing IVF to start a cycle leading to a day 3 or a day 5 transfer?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle between patients randomized at consultation to have embryo transfer either on day 3 or on day 5 of in-vitro culture.

METHODS

All patients <43 years of age for whom IVF was indicated were allowed to participate in the study (day 3 group, 234 patients; day 5 group, 226 patients). Ovarian stimulation was performed either using GnRH antagonists/recombinant FSH (rFSH) (day 3, 70.1% of patients; day 5, 72.6% of patients) or using the long GnRH agonist protocol/urinary gonadotropins (day 3, 29.9% of patients; day 5 27.4% of patients).

RESULTS

The random decision to initiate a cycle leading to day 5 as compared with a day 3 transfer was associated with a significantly lower chance of embryo cryopreservation (day 3, 61.5%; day 5, 50.4%; P<0.02). Ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle did not differ between the two groups compared [day 3, 32.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.4-38.2%; day 5, 33.2%, 95% CI 27.3-39.5%].

CONCLUSIONS

Advising patients at consultation to initiate an IVF cycle leading to a day 5 as compared with a day 3 transfer does not appear to increase the probability of ongoing pregnancy, and is associated with a significantly lower probability of obtaining cryopreserved embryos.

Multiple births from assisted reproductive technologies: a challenge that must be met

The success of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) has been accompanied by dramatic increases in multiple births and their associated costs. Physicians who perform ART must develop effective treatment paradigms to reduce multiple births or risk regulatory intervention.

Parenting stress in first-time mothers of twins and triplets conceived after in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To examine psychosocial and obstetric outcomes at 1 year postpartum in first-time mothers who conceived after IVF.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University medical center in the United Kingdom.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred twenty-nine mothers with a single naturally conceived birth, 95 mothers with a single IVF birth, and 36 mothers with a twin or triplet IVF birth.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

General Health Questionnaire and Parenting Stress Index.

RESULT(S)

Twenty-two percent of mothers of multiples had Parenting Stress Index scores indicating severe parenting stress, compared with 5% of mothers of IVF singletons (odds ratio, 5.14 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.55-16.99]) and 9% of mothers of naturally conceived singletons (odds ratio, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.03-7.4]). Mothers of multiple children conceived by IVF did not have poorer mental health but were less likely to be in paid employment at follow-up than were mothers of singletons conceived by IVF (odds ratio, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.13-0.67]) or naturally (odds ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.12-0.59]). Multiple births were more premature, had lower birth weights, and had more medical complications. They were more likely to have been admitted to special care than were singletons conceived by IVF (odds ratio, 14.6 [95% CI, 5.1-42.0)] or those conceived naturally (odds ratio, 10.59 [95% CI, 3.67-30.57])

CONCLUSION(S)

Clinicians should ensure that couples making decisions about embryo transfer have considered the potential psychosocial burden of a multiple birth.

Blastocyst culture: facts and fiction

The use of sequential media has made extended culture and transfer of blastocysts feasible for human IVF. Embryo transfer on day 5 has been claimed to result in higher implantation rates than transfer on day 3, on the basis of retrospective comparative studies. This is not supported convincingly, however, in randomized controlled trials published to date. Blastocyst culture imposes additional requirements in terms of personnel, equipment, education and cost and is associated with a greater incidence of monozygotic twinning and cycle cancellation rate than in the case of day 3 culture. In order for day 5 transfer to replace day 3 transfer, a convincing comparison between the two methods should therefore demonstrate the superiority of blastocyst transfer. There is still a need for properly designed randomized controlled trials to compare day 3 with day 5 transfer which will also address the effectiveness of a single blastocyst replacement in reducing the incidence of multiple pregnancies as well as the value of blastocyst cryopreservation.