Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial on various ovarian stimulation protocols

Fertility Preservation in People With Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To provide updated fertility preservation (FP) recommendations for people with cancer.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel convened and updated the systematic review.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-six studies comprise the evidence base.

RECOMMENDATIONS

People with cancer should be evaluated for and counseled about reproductive risks at diagnosis and during survivorship. Patients interested in or uncertain about FP should be referred to reproductive specialists. FP approaches should be discussed before cancer-directed therapy. Sperm cryopreservation should be offered to males before cancer-directed treatment, with testicular sperm extraction if unable to provide semen samples. Testicular tissue cryopreservation in prepubertal males is experimental and should be offered only in a clinical trial. Males should be advised of potentially higher genetic damage risks in sperm collected soon after cancer-directed therapy initiation and completion. For females, established FP methods should be offered, including embryo, oocyte, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), ovarian transposition, and conservative gynecologic surgery. In vitro maturation of oocytes may be offered as an emerging method. Post-treatment FP may be offered to people who did not undergo pretreatment FP or cryopreserve enough oocytes or embryos. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) should not be used in place of established FP methods but may be offered as an adjunct to females with breast cancer. For patients with oncologic emergencies requiring urgent oncologic therapy, GnRHa may be offered for menstrual suppression. Established FP methods in children who have begun puberty should be offered with patient assent and parent/guardian consent. The only established method for prepubertal females is OTC. Oncology teams should ensure prompt access to a multidisciplinary FP team. Clinicians should advocate for comprehensive FP services coverage and help patients access benefits.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/survivorship-guidelines.

How to Preserve Fertility in Reproductive-Age Women with Cancer

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy, among other gonadotoxic treatments, can significantly affect ovarian reserve and function, potentially leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and sterility. With the increasing survival rates among young female cancer patients, fertility preservation (FP) has become an essential aspect of cancer care. The decision to pursue FP depends on various factors, including patient age, ovarian reserve, the type of treatment, and its gonadotoxic potential. Several FP strategies are available, including oocyte, embryo, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. While oocyte and embryo cryopreservation are the gold standard techniques, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and in vitro maturation (IVM) present viable alternatives for patients who cannot undergo ovarian stimulation or for whom stimulation is contraindicated. Despite significant advances within the FP practice, challenges remain in ensuring timely FP counseling, equitable access to services, and optimizing long-term reproductive outcomes. Continued research is needed to refine existing FP techniques, explore innovative approaches, and address ethical considerations in FP decision-making. This review explores current FP options, their clinical applications, and future directions to improve reproductive outcomes in young women undergoing gonadotoxic treatments.

Ovarian stimulation response and fertility outcomes in patients with breast cancer across different stages, grades, and hormone receptor status for fertility preservation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the potential impact of stage, grade, and hormone receptor profile on ovarian stimulation response and fertility preservation outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated data from breast cancer patients who underwent fertility preservation at a tertiary medical center between 2014 and 2022. The outcomes of women with low-stage cancer (stages I and II) were compared with those of women with high-stage disease (stages III and IV or lymph node metastasis). Similarly, we compared those with low-grade (grades 1 and 2) and high-grade (grade 3) malignancies. In addition, we compared different hormone statuses of breast cancer (1) estrogen receptor (ER) positive vs. ER-negative and (2) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) vs. non-TNBC. The primary outcome measured was the number of mature oocytes, while the secondary outcomes included the numbers of total oocytes retrieved, peak estradiol levels, and subsequent fertility preservation outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included. Patients with high-grade tumors had a comparable number of mature oocytes (8 vs. 10, p = 0.08) compared to patients with low grade cancers. The stage-based analysis revealed a similar number of mature oocytes (8 vs. 10, p = 0.33) between high/low stage patients. In the hormone receptor-based analysis, no differences were seen in mature oocytes collected between the ER-positive/ER-negative group (9 vs. 9, p = 0.87) and the TNBC/non-TNBC group (11 vs. 9, p = 0.13). The utilization rate was 27.6% (13/47).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed similar ovarian stimulation response and fertility preservation outcomes among breast cancer patients with different prognostic factors.

Long-term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation before chemotherapy treatment in patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation before breast cancer chemotherapy treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort.

SUBJECTS

Two hundred thirteen women aged 18 to 43 years with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy during 2015-2019. Of those, 74 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation recipients, and 141 did not (controls).

EXPOSURE

controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Invasive disease-free survival, calculated from the time of surgery to the time of detection of breast cancer recurrence or death, whichever came first.

RESULTS

At diagnosis, fertility preservation recipients were significantly younger than controls (32.7 vs. 38.5 years), were less likely to be partnered (44.4% vs. 90.1%) or parous (38.9% vs. 95%), and were more likely to harbor a BRCA germline mutation (36.5% vs. 14.2%). Disease characteristics and treatment modalities were comparable between groups, apart from tumor staging, with maximal tumor diameter being >5 cm in 22.2% of fertility preservation recipients as opposed to 5.7% of controls. Mean follow-up was 60.9 and 65.4 months for fertility preservation recipients and controls, respectively. Five-year invasive disease-free survival was 80% for fertility preservation recipients and 86% for controls. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for statistically significant covariates, invasive disease-free survival remained similar between the groups (hazards ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-1.87). Invasive disease-free survival rates were not statistically different in clinically relevant subgroups, including patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 0.62-3.99) and those cotreated with tamoxifen during stimulation because of an estrogen receptor positive disease (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.67-3.49).

CONCLUSION

Fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for patients with breast cancer was not found to impair long-term oncologic outcomes, including in emergent clinically relevant subgroups.

Which variables are associated with recruitment failure? A nationwide review on obstetrical and gynaecological multicentre RCTs (2003-2023)

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess which variables are associated with recruitment failure of obstetrical and gynaecological randomised controlled trials (RCTs), leading to an extension of the study period.

DESIGN

Nationwide study.

SETTING

A cohort of RCTs supported by the trial centre of the Dutch Consortium of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

POPULATION

We included 83 RCTs that recruited patients between 1 March 2003 and 1 December 2023.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome was recruitment target not achieved within 6 months after the preplanned recruitment period. Secondary outcomes were recruitment target not achieved within an extension period of at least 12 months and premature termination of the trial. In all RCTs, we collected information on variables with a potential effect on recruitment failure, recorded at five levels; patient, doctor, participating centre, study organisation and study design.

RESULTS

In total, 46 of 83 RCTs (55%) did not achieve their targeted recruitment within the preplanned study period with a maximal extension period of 6 months. The most relevant variables for recruitment failure in multivariable risk prediction modelling were presence of a no-treatment arm (where treatment is standard clinical practice), a compensation fee of less than €200 per included patient, funding of less than €350 000, while a preceding pilot study lowered this risk.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified that the presence of a no-treatment arm, low funding and a low compensation fee per included patient were the most relevant risk factors for recruitment failure within the preplanned period, while a preceding pilot study lowered this risk. Awareness of these variables is important when designing future studies.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with or without letrozole for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Multimodal anticancer therapies greatly damage the fertility of breast cancer patients, which raises urgent demand for fertility preservation. The standard options for fertility preservation are oocyte and embryo cryopreservation; both require controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). However, there are safety concerns regarding breast cancer relapse due to the elevated serum estradiol levels during COH. Serum estradiol levels can be effectively decreased with the highly specific aromatase inhibitor letrozole. Letrozole is still uncommonly used during COH for fertility preservation, which has only been reported in a few studies, and the evidence of oocyte retrieval during ovarian stimulation and short-term safety from the perspective study is insufficient. As a result, this study will compare the efficacy of ovarian stimulation and the short-term safety of letrozole COH and non-letrozole COH protocols for preserving fertility in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an open-label, multicentre RCT being conducted in five Chinese reproductive medical centres. 64 eligible patients diagnosed with breast cancer will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the letrozole or non-letrozole group during their COH cycles. The primary outcome is the number of mature oocytes. The secondary outcomes are the number of high-quality embryos, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS) and recurrence rate of breast cancer.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Review Committee of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (KY-Q-2023-840-02). Written informed consent will be obtained from each participant. Findings will be disseminated to patients, clinicians and commissioning groups through peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2300078625.

Combined removal of ovarian teratoma and oocyte retrieval by laparoscopic surgery under regional anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the simultaneous laparoscopic approach for teratoma removal and oocyte retrieval performed under regional anesthesia in a woman, desiring to preserve fertility. The patient included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online including social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites, and other applicable sites.

DESIGN

Video case report demonstrating the clinical management and laparoscopic teratoma removal combined with oocyte retrieval accomplished under regional anesthesia.

PATIENT(S)

We present a case of a 31-year-old woman who referred to our Fertility Center with a previous history of right salpingo-oophorectomy for mucinous ovarian cystadenoma and the presence of a large ovarian teratoma of ten centimeters of the contralateral ovary.

INTERVENTION(S)

The ovarian stimulation started in the early follicular phase. Not being able to visualize follicular growth during the ovarian stimulation, it was decided to adopt fixed protocol with antagonist on the 5th day and to proceed, on 15th day, with a laparoscopic pick-up and simultaneous removal of the cyst.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Laparoscopic surgery was performed: the left ovary appeared larger in size for the presence of the suspicious mature dermoid cyst and multiple follicles, previously not identified at ultrasound imaging. The follicles contained oocytes that were aspirated with an aspiration needle of 17 G connected to a craft suction pump. Then, practicing the stripping technique, an enucleation of the ovarian cyst was performed. Surprisingly, the removal of the cyst revealed other follicles that were readily aspirated.

RESULT(S)

The patient remained awake during the entire procedure and a low pressure of 10 mmHg was maintained at 15° of Trendelenburg position. A total of seven follicles were aspirated, seven oocytes were retrieved, and six mature oocytes were cryopreserved. The cyst was totally removed and no intracavitary spillage was caused.

CONCLUSION(S)

Simultaneous laparoscopic approach for teratoma removal and oocyte cryopreservation should be considered an effective fertility preservation strategy in patients in whom the presence of an ovarian neoformation does not allow visualization of growing follicles by ultrasound. Laparoscopic oocyte retrieval under regional anesthesia is a safe and well-tolerated technique and should be considered for patients where the transvaginal approach could not be performed.

Use of tamoxifene-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for fertility preservation before breast cancer treatment: A prospective cohort study with a 5-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Fertility issues are of great concern for young women undergoing treatment for breast cancer (BC). Fertility preservation (FP) protocols using controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with letrozole have been widely used with overall good results. However, letrozole cannot be used in every country in this context. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen for COS in women with early BC undergoing FP.

METHODS

This multicentric prospective study included patients aged 18-40, diagnosed with stage I, II and III invasive BC, undergoing tamoxifen-COS before adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The primary endpoint was the efficacy of tamoxifen-COS protocol evaluated by the number of oocytes collected and vitrified. Secondary endpoints included the time interval before chemotherapy, breast cancer (BC) recurrence rates, and reproductive outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were included between 2014 and 2017, aged 31.5 ± 4 years on average. 37.9 % received NAC and 62.1 % received adjuvant chemotherapy. FP procedure was successful in 89.5 % of the cycles. The mean number of collected and vitrified oocytes was 12.8 ± 7.9 and 9.8 ± 6.2, respectively. The mean duration of COS was 10.4 ± 1.9 days. Median time before chemotherapy initiation was 3.6 weeks (IQR 3.1; 4.1) for women receiving NAC. Five-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were in-line with those expected in this population. Twenty-one women had spontaneous full-term pregnancies, while 5 underwent IVF cycles with frozen-thawed oocytes, without pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

Tamoxifen-COS protocols appear to be feasible before adjuvant or NAC treatment in young BC patients and efficient in terms of oocyte yield.

Is there a preferred time interval between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger and oocyte retrieval in GnRH antagonist cycles? A retrospective cohort of planned fertility preservation cycles

BACKGROUND

The ideal time frame between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (GnRHa) trigger administration and oocyte retrieval in GnRH antagonist cycles has not been well studied. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of this time interval on oocyte yield and oocyte maturation rate in GnRH antagonist cycles designated for non-medical ("planned") oocyte cryopreservation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent elective fertility preservation, using the GnRH antagonist protocol and exclusively triggered by GnRH-agonist. We focused on the effect of the trigger-to-retrieval time interval on oocyte yield and maturation rate, while also incorporating age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, basal Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) levels, as well as the type and dosage of gonadotropin FSH medication.

RESULTS

438 cycles were included. Trigger-to-retrieval time interval ranged from 32.03 to 39.92 h. The mean oocyte yield showed no statistically significant difference when comparing retrievals < 36 h (n = 240, 11.86 ± 8.6) to those triggered at ≥ 36 h (n = 198, 12.24 ± 7.73) (P = 0.6). Upon dividing the cohort into four-time quartiles, no significant differences in the number of retrieved oocytes were observed (P = 0.54). Multivariate regression analysis failed to reveal any significant associations between the interval and the aforementioned variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The GnRHa trigger to oocyte retrieval interval range in our cohort did not significantly affect oocyte yield and maturation rate.

Survey on the implementation status and reproductive outcomes of oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in Japan: Historical comparison with nationwide surveys

PURPOSE

To clarify the reproductive outcomes of fertility preservation (FP) treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a mailed-in questionnaire survey at institutions certified by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology to investigate the number of oocyte cryopreservations (OC) and ovarian tissue cryopreservations (OTC) performed from December 2016 to the end of 2020. And, we conducted a detailed investigation of cases in which frozen specimens were used during the investigation period, and made historical comparisons with previous nationwide studies.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 114 out of 150 facilities (response rate: 76.0%) for OC and 43 out of 51 for OTC (response rate: 84.3%). Breast cancer was the most common disease among patients whose FP specimens were used. During the study period, 1237 OCs and 198 OTCs were performed. In addition, 57 cycles of embryo transfer (ET) using cryopreserved oocytes and 12 cases of ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) were performed. The mean age of patients who underwent ET using cryopreserved oocytes was 34.8 (±5.8) years, with a median age of 36 years. The pregnancy rate per ET using cryopreserved oocytes was 26.3% and the live birth rate (LBR) was 17.5%. Further, the LBR per patient was 43.3%, and the pregnancy rate following OTTs was 33.3%. Also, controlled ovarian stimulation using the random start method or the combination of aromatase inhibitors had no effect on pregnancy outcome.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of both OCs and OTCs have markedly increased over time in Japan, with comparable reproductive outcomes as other reports.

Fertility preservation before and after cancer treatment in children, adolescents, and young adults

Fertility is a top concern for many survivors of cancer diagnosed as children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA). Fertility preservation (FP) treatments are effective, evidence-based interventions to support their family building goals. Fertility discussions are a part of quality oncology care throughout the cancer care continuum. For nearly 2 decades, clinical guidelines recommend counseling patients about the possibility of infertility promptly at diagnosis and offering FP options and referrals as indicated. Multiple guidelines now recommend post-treatment counseling. Infertility risks differ by cancer treatments and age, rendering risk stratification a central part of FP care. To support FP decision-making, online tools for female risk estimation are available. At diagnosis, females can engage in mature oocyte/embryo cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, ovarian suppression with GnRH agonists, in vitro oocyte maturation, and/or conservative management for gynecologic cancers. Post-treatment, several populations may consider undergoing oocyte/embryo cryopreservation. Male survivors' standard of care FP treatments center on sperm cryopreservation before cancer treatment and do not have the same post-treatment indication for additional gamete cryopreservation. In practice, FP care requires systemized processes to routinely screen for FP needs, bridge oncology referrals to fertility, offer timely fertility consultations and access to FP treatments, and support financial navigation. Sixteen US states passed laws requiring health insurers to provide insurance benefits for FP treatments, but variation among the laws and downstream implementation are barriers to accessing FP treatments. To preserve the reproductive futures of CAYA survivors, research is needed to improve risk stratification, FP options, and delivery of FP care.

Is controlled ovarian stimulation safe in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is the method of choice for fertility preservation (FP) in young patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer (eBC). Nevertheless, some challenges still question its role, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, where concerns arise about potential delay in the onset of anticancer treatment, and in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease, as cancer cells may proliferate under the estrogenic peak associated with stimulation. Therefore, this review aims to examine the available evidence on the safety of COS in eBC patients eligible for neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), particularly in HR+ disease.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and safety of COS in eBC and including patients referred to NAT and/or with HR+ disease. Time to NAT and survival outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the three matched cohort studies assessing the impact of COS on time to start NAT, only one reported a significant small delay in the cohort undergoing COS compared with the control group, whereas the other studies found no difference. Regarding survival outcomes, overall, no increased risk of recurrence or death was found, either in patients undergoing COS in the neoadjuvant setting regardless of HR expression or in HR+ disease regardless of the timing of COS relative to surgery. However, there are no data on the safety of COS in the specific combined scenario of HR+ disease undergoing NAT.

CONCLUSION

Neither the indication to NAT nor the HR positivity constitutes per se an a priori contraindication to COS. Shared decision making between clinicians and patients is essential to carefully weigh the risks and benefits in each individual case. Prospective studies designed to specifically investigate this issue are warranted.

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in breast cancer patients: Does oestrogen receptor status make a difference?

BACKGROUND

The presence of different breast cancer receptor status may impact ovarian stimulation outcomes.

AIM

To study the association between oestrogen receptor (ER) status in breast cancer patients and fertility preservation outcomes in a major tertiary referral centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women who underwent fertility preservation following the diagnosis of breast cancer from 2008 to 2018 were included in the study. Patient age, ovarian stimulation parameters and laboratory outcomes were recorded and compared between the ER positive and negative groups. The primary outcome was total number of oocytes frozen. Secondary outcomes included total number of oocytes collected, mature oocytes, and embryos frozen.

RESULTS

The women included in the study (n = 214) were analysed in the following groups based on their fertility preservation method: oocyte freezing (n = 131), embryo freezing (n = 70), and both embryo and oocyte freezing (n = 13). There was an increase in the mean (but not mature) number of oocytes frozen (12.4 and 9.2, P-value = 0.03) favouring the ER positive group, even though the women in this group were older (35.0 and 33.4, P-value of 0.03). There is no difference in the starting follicle-stimulating hormone dose, duration of stimulation, mature oocytes collected, and embryos frozen in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ER positive breast cancer may have more positive ovarian stimulation outcomes.

Breast Cancer and Fertility Preservation in Young Female Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer affects almost 1.5 million women worldwide below the age of 45 years each year. Many of these women will be advised to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy to minimize the risk of death or recurrence of the tumor. For these patients, chemotherapy is a known cause of infertility, as it can damage primordial follicles, which can lead to early menopause or premature ovarian insufficiency. This systematic review aims to synthesize the current evidence of the most suitable treatments for fertility preservation.

METHODOLOGY

This review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. The authors conducted an extensive search from the last 15 years. Relevant studies were pursued in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up until 31 July 2023. A total of seven eligible studies were identified.

RESULTS

From the reviewed literature, ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists showed promising results in preserving fertility for breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Additionally, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation demonstrated successful outcomes, with embryo cryopreservation being the most effective option. Notably, the slow-freezing and vitrification methods were both effective in preserving embryos, with vitrification showing superior results in clinical-assisted reproductive technologies. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation emerged as a viable option for prepubertal girls and those unable to undergo conventional ovarian stimulation. The potential of in vitro maturation (IVM) as an alternative method presents a promising avenue for future fertility preservation research.

DISCUSSION

The most suitable treatments for fertility preservation in young patients is the temporary suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing analogs, while the patient undergoes chemotherapy and cryopreservation. For cryopreservation, the physicians might deem it necessary to either cryopreserve ovarian tissue taken from the patient before any treatment or cryopreserve embryos/oocytes. Cryopreservation of oocytes and/or embryos is the most effective solution for fertility preservation in women of reproductive age, who have a sufficient ovarian reserve and are diagnosed with breast cancer, regardless of the histological type of the tumor. Because approximately 50% of young breast cancer patients are interested in becoming pregnant right after completion of therapy, the evolution and development of fertility preservation techniques promise to be very exciting.

Ovarian stimulation and oocyte cryopreservation in females with cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed the most recent developments including the safety and effectiveness data and success rates in individualized ovarian stimulation protocols for adult and postpubertal females with cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

In women with breast cancer, aromatase inhibitor- and tamoxifen-supplemented stimulation protocols increase the margin of safety by limiting estrogen exposure. The outcomes of ovarian stimulation appear similar between cancer and noncancer populations, even with the recently developed random-start protocols, which allow initiation of ovarian stimulation anytime during the menstrual cycle. Based on lower anti-Mullerian hormone levels and primordial follicle density, carriers of BRCA pathogenic variants ( BRCApv ) have decreased ovarian reserve in comparison to women without those variants and may lose larger portion of their ovarian reserve post chemotherapy. Oocyte cryopreservation is also emerging as a suitable fertility preservation approach for selected postpubertal girls as young as 12 years of age.

SUMMARY

Individualized ovarian stimulation approaches combined with improvements in cryopreservation techniques increased the success and safety margin to preserve fertility with oocyte freezing. Women with BRCApv , on the other hand, may be at disadvantage as they have lower ovarian reserve and may lose larger portion of their ovarian reserve post chemotherapy compared to women who do not carry these variants.

[Indication and implementation of fertility preservation measures in female cancer patients]

The aspects of fertility preservation in women prior to surgical, gonadotoxic or radiation therapy represent a challenging topic in many disciplines and often in an interdisciplinary setting. Within an often short period of time, individual counselling and consideration must be given as to whether fertility-protective measures are useful. The implementation is ultimately decided by the patient. A prerequisite for helpful counselling is knowledge about the potential effects of cancer treatment on ovarian function as well as the implementation and potential individual benefits of fertility-protective measures. Networks such as FertiPROTEKT Netzwerk e. V. are helpful for orientation in terms of content and timely implementation of counselling and corresponding measures.

Impact of Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants on Fertility Preservation in Young Women

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that breast cancer (BC) and germline BRCA pathogenic variants (gBRCA PVs) could have a deleterious impact on ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, data are limited and mixed. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of fertility preservation (FP) in terms of the number of collected mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation (OS) in young women carrying a gBRCA PV, associated or not with BC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric study at HUB-Hôpital Erasme in Brussels. All women aged between 18 and 41 years diagnosed with invasive non-metastatic BC and/or gBRCA PV carriers who underwent OS for FP or preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorder (PGT-M) between November 2012 and October 2021 were included. Three groups were compared: BC patients without a gBRCA PV, BC patients with a gBRCA PV, and healthy gBRCA PV carriers. Ovarian reserve was evaluated based on the efficacy of OS and AMH levels.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients underwent 100 cycles. The mean age (32.2 ± 3.9 years; p = 0.61) and median AMH level (1.9 [0.2-13] μg/L; p = 0.22) were similar between groups. Correlations between the number of mature oocytes and AMH level (p < 0.001) and between AMH and age (p < 0.001) were observed. No differences in the number of retrieved mature oocytes were observed between groups (p = 0.41), or for other OS parameters.

CONCLUSION

Neither BC nor a gBRCA PV significantly affects ovarian reserve and FP efficacy in terms of the number of mature oocytes retrieved.

The effectiveness of controlled ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen for patients with estrogen-sensitive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Tamoxifen is used for the suppression of estrogen-sensitive tumor recurrence in oocyte retrieval cycles. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the quality of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with co-administration of gonadotropins and tamoxifen (COS with tamoxifen).

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for articles on October 30, 2022. The authors included studies comparing COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropins and letrozole (COS with letrozole) or gonadotropin only (COS with gonadotropin only) for fertility preservation in patients with breast cancer. The main outcome measures were the COS quality, total number of retrieved oocytes (TOR), total number of mature oocytes (TMO), and peak estradiol levels (PEL).

Results

Four studies (348 patients, two randomized controlled trials, and two cohort studies) were included in our meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in TOR (95% CI, [-3.84, 2.90]) and TMO (95% CI, [-2.20, 2.64]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole. There was also no difference in TOR (95% CI, [-6.14, 1.86]) between COS with tamoxifen and COS with gonadotropin only. Statistically significant decrease was observed in PEL during COS with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (95% CI, [1414.4, 4953.7]).

Conclusions

The quality did not differ between COS with tamoxifen and COS with letrozole or gonadotropin only.