ART in recurrent miscarriage: preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening or surrogacy?

Risks in Surrogacy Considering the Embryo: From the Preimplantation to the Gestational and Neonatal Period

Surrogacy is an assisted reproduction-based approach in which the intended parents assign the gestation and birth to another woman called the surrogate mother. The drivers of surrogacy refer largely to infertility, medical conditions, same-sex couples' parenting, and cases of diversity regarding sexual identity and orientation. Surrogacy consists of a valid option for a variety of conditions or circumstances ranging from medical to social reasons. However, surrogacy may be associated with risks during the preimplantation, prenatal, and neonatal period. It became obvious during the exhaustive literature research that data on surrogacy and its association with factors specific to the IVF practice and the options available were not fully represented. Could it be that surrogacy management adds another level of complexity to the process from the ovarian stimulation, the subsequent IVF cycle, and the techniques employed within the IVF and the Genetic Laboratory to the fetal, perinatal, and neonatal period? This work emphasizes the risks associated with surrogacy with respect to the preimplantation embryo, the fetus, and the infant. Moreover, it further calls for larger studies reporting on surrogacy and comparing the surrogate management to that of the routine IVF patient in order to avoid suboptimal management of a surrogate cycle. This is of particular importance in light of the fact that the surrogate cycle may include not only the surrogate but also the egg donor, sperm donor, and the commissioning couple or single person.

Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryo selection method in aneuploidy screening?

To select cytogenetically normal embryos, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) aneuploidy screening (AS) is used in numerous centers around the world. Chromosomal abnormalities lead to developmental problems, implantation failure, and early abortion of embryos. The usefulness of PGD in identifying single-gene diseases, human leukocyte antigen typing, X-linked diseases, and specific genetic diseases is well-known. In this review, preimplantation embryo genetics, PGD research studies, and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology PGD Consortium studies and reports are examined. In addition, criteria for embryo selection, technical aspects of PGD-AS, and potential noninvasive embryo selection methods are described. Indications for PGD and possible causes of discordant PGD results between the centers are discussed. The limitations of fluorescence in situ hybridization, and the advantages of the array comparative genomic hybridization are included in this review. Although PGD-AS for patients of advanced maternal age has been shown to improve in vitro fertilization outcomes in some studies, to our knowledge, there is not sufficient evidence to use advanced maternal age as the sole indication for PGD-AS. PGD-AS might be harmful and may not increase the success rates of in vitro fertilization. At the same time PGD, is not recommended for recurrent implantation failure and unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

Recurrent pregnancy loss - beyond evidence based medicine

Patients with five or more unexplained recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL) have a poor prognosis for a subsequent delivery compared to patients with two to three RPL. Treatment guidelines are needed to address this select group of patients.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for couples with a Robertsonian translocation: practical information for genetic counseling

PURPOSE

To evaluate the proportions of abnormal and normal embryos detected by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of infertile couples of whom one was a Robertsonian translocation (RT) carrier, and to provide practical information, including details of reproductive outcomes, to aid in genetic counseling of such couples.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all PGD cycles conducted to deal with RT at our center between January 2000 and December 2009. Subject demographic and clinical data were compared with the results of PGD.

RESULTS

Employing PGD, we conducted a total of 66 cycles on 34 couples of whom one was an RT carrier, including 24 female and 10 male carriers. Of the 514 blastomeres tested, 161 (31.3%) were normal or balanced. Of the 57 cycles that included embryo transfer, 17 (29.8%) attained positivity for human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). A total of 17 embryos were implanted and 16 babies, including two sets of twins, were born. The takehome baby rate was 41.2% per couple and the loss rate 6.6%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the proportion of alternate embryos associated with a sensitivity of 70.6% for prediction of clinical pregnancy following PGD was 0.31. Sex of the carrier and type of translocation were not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Couples with RT may benefit from PGD; pregnancy success rate is improved and embryo loss reduced. We found that about 30% of embryos were of normal or balanced chromosomal constitution and that the percentage of normal or balanced embryos was predictive of PGD outcome.

The role of assisted reproductive technology in the management of recurrent pregnancy loss

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Description of genetic screening of preimplantation embryos as a means of reducing miscarriages in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.

RECENT FINDINGS

That the promise of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for ameliorating recurrent pregnancy loss has been fulfilled is controversial. An array of comparative studies has suggested a positive effect of PGS on implantation rate, but these have been balanced by studies showing no effect or a negative effect, highlighting the need for more rigorously designed studies and randomized controlled trials. Emerging technologies may provide more information from the embryo biopsies even as the mosaicism of the embryo and its implications for interpreting PGS data are recognized.

SUMMARY

Through the screening of embryos for abnormality in chromosome number or structure and selecting only normal embryos for transfer, PGS was envisioned and applied as a therapeutic tool for improving implantation and live birth rates from in-vitro fertilization and providing a means of attenuating pregnancy loss in recurrent pregnancy loss patients. An array of reports on the effects of PGS on embryo implantation and live birth rates has been made since its introduction, showing, variously, increases, decreases or no changes in these parameters. Various factors may influence the efficacy of PGS, including the patient population to which it is applied, technical aspects such as embryo biopsy, the genetic analysis and embryo culture environment, the current limitation of the genetic analysis (a subset of, rather than all, the 24 chromosomes) and the mosaicism of the embryo and blastocyst. Collectively, these contribute to the challenge of optimizing PGS and understanding how the screening result reflects the ultimate genetic constitution of the conceptus. Emerging cytogenetic and molecular technologies such as comparative genomic hybridization and microarray analysis may provide a broader appraisal of the embryo for a more comprehensive evaluation of developmental potential and prognosis for live birth.

Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis has been proposed as a method to improve assisted reproduction technology outcomes, but different techniques have produced conflicting results. The use of appropriate techniques may provide positive outcomes.

Evaluation and management of recurrent early pregnancy loss

Recurrent pregnancy loss affects up to 5% of couples trying to establish a family. Evaluation classically begins after 3 consecutive miscarriages of less than 10 weeks of gestation but may be warranted earlier if a prior miscarriage was found to be euploid, or if there is concomitant infertility and/or advancing maternal age. The evaluation begins with an extensive history and physical, followed by a diagnostic screening protocol. Management must be evidence-based; unproven treatments should be avoided. If no factor is identified, many couples will still eventually have a successful pregnancy outcome with supportive therapy alone.

Disturbances in placental immunology: ready for therapeutic interventions?

Recent studies have provided new insight into aberrations in the immunological interplay between mother and fetus and their potential role in the development of recurrent fetal loss and preeclampsia. The action of anti-phospholipid antibodies in recurrent fetal loss is now proposed to involve the complement system, neutrophil activation and the production of TNFalpha by immune bystander cells. A clear involvement of the immune system is emerging in preeclampsia, involving mainly the innate arm, especially neutrophils. The activation of peripheral neutrophils by placentally released inflammatory debris triggers the induction of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which may lead to an occlusion of the intervillous space, thereby further promoting a condition of placental hypoxia. It has, hence, been suggested that new therapeutic strategies be developed, including the possible use of TNFalpha antagonists in cases of recurrent miscarriage. These strategies need to be addressed with caution due to the possible induction of fetal congenital abnormalities.

Reproductive outcome after chromosome analysis in couples with two or more miscarriages: index [corrected]-control study

OBJECTIVE

To compare reproductive outcomes in couples carrying a structural chromosome abnormality and non-carrier couples referred for chromosome analysis after two or more miscarriages.

DESIGN

Index [corrected]-control study.

SETTING

Six centres for clinical genetics in the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

278 carrier couples and 427 non-carrier couples referred for chromosome analysis between 1992 and 2000 after two or more miscarriages before 20 weeks of gestation. Couples were followed up for at least 24 months after chromosome analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The birth of at least one healthy child, at least one more miscarriage, and viable offspring with unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities after parental chromosome analysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up after chromosome analysis was 5.8 years. 120 of 247 (49%) carrier couples had one or more miscarriage after chromosome analysis compared with 122 of 409 (30%) non-carrier couples (difference 19%, 95% confidence interval 11% to 26%; P < 0.01). The percentage of couples with at least one healthy child was not significantly different in carrier couples (83%) and non-carrier couples (84%) (difference -1%, - 7% to 5%). Among 550 pregnancies in carrier couples, two viable unbalanced chromosome abnormalities were detected at prenatal diagnosis (0.4%) and the fetuses aborted and two children with an unbalanced karyotype were born (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Couples whose carrier status was ascertained after two or more miscarriages have a low risk of viable offspring with unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities. Their chances of having a healthy child are as high as non-carrier couples, despite a higher risk of miscarriage.

Embryo aneuploidy screening for repeated implantation failure and unexplained recurrent miscarriage

Among other factors, chromosomal abnormalities that originate from gametogenesis and preimplantation embryonic development are thought to be one of the major contributing factors for early embryonic death and failure of pregnancy. However, so far, no non-invasive technique exists that allows the detection of the chromosomal complement of an oocyte or a developing embryo as a whole. Rather, by removing polar bodies/blastomeres, recent developments on preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening (PGD-AS) have paved the way to detect and possibly eliminate the majority of chromosomally abnormal embryos, thereby increasing the chance of a healthy pregnancy. This article summarizes the origin and impact of chromosomal abnormalities on human reproduction in cases with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and unexplained recurrent miscarriage. It also discusses recent advances regarding the possible benefits of PGD-AS in such cases.

Recurrent miscarriage: pathophysiology and outcome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews new concepts in the aetiology of recurrent miscarriage, presents new outcome data and evaluates new modalities of treatment for unexplained recurrent miscarriage.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis has been considered an option for couples who have structural chromosomal abnormalities or unexplained recurrent miscarriage. The association between thrombophilias and adverse pregnancy outcome is further reviewed. In relation to this, there is increasing support for the use of thromboprophylaxis in improving pregnancy outcome in women with inherited thrombophilias. Nonrandomized studies have shown that the reduction in insulin levels with metformin in insulin-resistant individuals may reduce miscarriage risk by restoring normal haemostasis and improving the endometrial milieu. With respect to immunological concepts there is now evidence to suggest that, in addition to a suppression of maternal cell-mediated immunity, some elements of the innate immune system are activated in successful pregnancies.

SUMMARY

With the exception of aspirin and heparin for the prevention of recurrent miscarriage in women with the antiphospholipid syndrome, no other suggested therapies for this heterogeneous group of patients have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials. These include thromboprophylaxis for inherited thrombophilias and use of insulin sensitizers in women with insulin resistance and/or polycystic ovarian syndrome. The role of the innate immune system in pregnancy was recently highlighted, and use of nonspecific therapies to suppress the maternal immune response to pregnancy should be reassessed.

Can preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve success rates in recurrent aborters with translocations?

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for people suffering recurrent miscarriages is increasingly being performed worldwide. However, there is limited information on whether PGD can improve success rates in translocation carriers. We therefore compared pregnancy outcomes between PGD and natural pregnancy cases, reviewing the clinical research database. No improvement in the success rate at the first oocyte retrieval was evident in reciprocal translocation carriers. In the natural course of events, patients with translocations can hope for a baby in the long term. However, with PGD, rates can reach 68% after IVF failure and the duration to eventual birth may be shorter than with natural pregnancies. In the particular case of Robertsonian translocations, PGD may not be necessary because natural success rates are relatively good.