Individualized dosing of follitropin delta affects live birth and safety in in vitro fertilization treatment: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To undertake a one-stage meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials comparing individualized dosing of follitropin delta vs. other forms of follitropin (alpha and beta) for live birth (LB) rates (LBR) and safety parameters in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment.

DESIGN

Systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Web of Science to identify eligible phase 3 trials between January 1, 2000, and February 1, 2023.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All analyses were based on individual participant data. We used a general linear mixed effects logistic regression model using fixed effects for treatment drugs interacting with log (AMH) level, age, and random effects for country and trial to compare the primary efficacy and safety outcomes of LB and early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or the need for OHSS preventative measures, with ovarian stimulation parameters and neonatal outcomes also assessed. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023399711.

RESULTS

Three trials met inclusion criteria and included 2,685 women undertaking 2,682 cycles between October 2013 and May 2020, with LB follow-up through to February 1, 2023. For women with an elevated AMH level (≥15 pmol/L), there was high-quality evidence that the use of individualized dosing of follitropin delta was associated with an increased LB rate (adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14, 2.36). Safety outcomes were also improved with a reduced risk of both early OHSS and/or the need for preventative interventions (adj OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15, 0.49) and early moderate or severe OHSS (adj OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16, 0.58). These improvements in outcomes were obtained with a lower total dose of gonadotropin (-48.7 μg, 95% CI -53.7, -43.8) and no adjustments in the daily dose. In contrast, similar LB rates (adj OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.63, 1.17) and safety outcomes (adj OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.76, 4.87) were observed for women with an AMH level of <15 pmol/L. There were no clinically meaningful differences in neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Using follitropin delta in an AMH level and weight-based algorithm rather than conventional licensed dosing of follitropin alpha or beta for ovarian stimulation in women is associated with improved LB rates and safety outcomes for women with elevated AMH levels.

Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Fertility Treatment Decisions in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Literature Review

Anti-Mullerian hormone is a robust marker of ovarian reserve and ovarian response in in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, its role extends beyond improving the safety of IVF by aiding in choosing appropriate protocols and dosing. This review looks at the value of pre-treatment anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) value in choosing the appropriate modality of treatment and its predictive ability for the outcomes of such treatment. It briefly addresses the factors that may modulate AMH levels and make clinical decision-making challenging.

FSH administration at 12-hour intervals for the first 2 days, combined with mandatory GnRH-agonist trigger and blastocyst vitrification in women (<80Kg) with high AMH levels, results in higher cumulative live birth rates and is safer

We aimed to determine if a programme change to 12 hourly injections of FSH (150 IU per injection) for the first 2 days of stimulation in women with high ovarian reserve (AMH ≥ 30 pmol/L), followed by 24 hourly injections, would elicit increased earlier follicular recruitment, higher egg yields and blastocyst embryos for cryopreservation, leading to potential higher cumulative pregnancy rates, than conventional daily injections throughout. For safety reasons, the approach required mandatory cryopreservation of all blastocysts (mFET group; n = 74), after ovulation trigger with GnRH-agonist, in GnRH-antagonist controlled cycles. The 'Comparator group' (n = 91) comprised women with the same high AMH levels treated with the same base dose of FSH, with the aim of fresh blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation of supernumerary embryos, treated over the preceding 2 years. There was no difference in age, AMH, weight or BMI between the groups. The mFET group achieved higher egg (17.7 versus 11.7; p < 0.001) and embryo (10.9 versus 7.2; p < 0.001) yields and fewer cases with sub-optimal embryo yields (7% versus 22%; p = 0.018). The cumulative live birth rate was superior in the mFET group (73% versus 43%), as was the safety profile, and negligible rate of treatment plan modification.

Predicting the total number of retrieved oocytes following double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim)

STUDY QUESTION

Can anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) help predict how many oocytes will be retrieved following double stimulation (DuoStim)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A simple clinical tool can use serum AMH values to predict ovarian response following DuoStim in IVF cycles.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

The knowledge that multiple follicular waves arise during a single ovarian cycle has led to the introduction of unconventional ovarian stimulation protocols. The DuoStim protocol involves two successive ovarian stimulations performed during a single ovarian cycle and has been proposed as an approach for patients with poor ovarian response and for medical fertility preservation. As AMH has been used as a marker of ovarian reserve and stimulation response, the current study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of AMH in predicting the number of retrieved oocytes following DuoStim.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a retrospective observational study involving 116 patients who received IVF treatment from January 2021 to September 2022.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study was conducted at a private IVF centre. Only patients who had their AMH measured prior to treatment and had complete patient records regarding their clinical and IVF/ICSI cycle characteristics were included. The primary outcome was the correlation between AMH values and the number of oocytes retrieved following DuoStim. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes. Spearman's R was used to analyse correlations between variables, while the C statistic was used to calculate the diagnostic performance of AMH.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

AMH levels were significantly correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved after the DuoStim (R 0.61; CI 0.44-0.70; P < 0.0001). The difference in the total number of oocytes retrieved between the first (median 4 oocytes, interquartile range (IQR) 2-6) and second (median 6 oocytes, IQR 3.2-8) stimulation was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in the number of mature oocytes that were retrieved (median of 3 and 4 in the first and second stimulations, respectively). After the first stimulation, 68% of patients had at least one blastocyst available, while after the second stimulation, 74% did (NS). Based on linear regression, each 0.25 ng/ml increase in basal AMH corresponds to one additional oocyte recovered at the end of both stimulations (R2: 0.32, P < 0.0001).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The results are limited owing to the observational nature of the study and the number of participants.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Counselling infertile couples regarding the intermediate outcome of IVF (i.e. number of retrieved oocytes) is one of the most demanding tasks that clinicians face. To our knowledge, this is the first study that provides an easy-to-use clinical tool that enables the quantitative prediction of ovarian response following DuoStim, based on serum AMH values.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was obtained for this study. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Corifolitropin-Alfa plus Five Days Letrozole Versus Daily Recombinant-FSH in Expected Normo-Responder Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Background: In recent times, different novel GnRH-antagonist protocols with various combinations of gonadotropins and other molecules (e.g., aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators) have been proposed for expected normal ovarian responders undergoing assisted reproductive treatments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel ovarian stimulation protocol based on the combination of corifollitropin-alfa plus five days of letrozole in E-NOR women undergoing IVF as compared with a daily recombinant-FSH regimen. Methods: We conducted a retrospective-controlled study on 182 couples undergoing their first IVF attempt. In Group A (experimental), letrozole (2.5 mg daily) was administered from day 2 (up to day 6 of the cycle), followed by corifollitropin-alfa on day 3 and daily recombinant FSH from day 10. In Group B, recombinant FSH from day 2 were administered (150 IU-225 IU daily). Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS Statistics. The primary outcome was the total number of MII oocytes retrieved. Results: Group A showed similar results compared to Group B in terms of MII oocytes, live birth, implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates (p = ns). Nevertheless, the experimental group was associated with a trend towards a higher number of developing follicles, total oocytes, and embryos (p < 0.05) with lower estradiol and progesterone values at ovulation induction compared to Group B, resulting in an increased chance of performing a fresh embryo transfer (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The combination of CFα plus five days of letrozole was associated with a trend towards a higher number of developing follicles, total oocytes, and obtained embryos. Moreover, the experimental protocol resulted in lower estradiol and progesterone values at ovulation induction compared to daily rFSH, with an increased chance of performing a fresh embryo transfer (with no OHSS occurrence). Given the observational design of our study, further well-conducted RCTs are needed.

Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus trigger with hCG alone in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching

Background

Despite a large number of studies on the selection of trigger drugs, it remains unclear whether the dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, compared to the trigger with hCG alone, can improve the reproductive outcome of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the laboratory and clinical outcomes of dual trigger versus single trigger.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 520 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between July 2014 and September 2020 at the Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI treatment with fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH antagonist protocol. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding variables and binary logistic regression analysis to determine the correlations between trigger methods and pregnancy outcomes. After propensity score matching, 57 cycles from each group were evaluated and compared for laboratory or clinical outcomes in this retrospective cohort study.

Results

There was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos available, top-quality embryos, or the rate of normal fertilization between the dual-trigger and single-trigger protocols, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were also similar between the two groups, while the miscarriage rate (37.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.045) was higher in the dual-trigger than the single-trigger group. Subsequent binary logistic regression analysis showed that age was a remarkably significant independent predictor of both clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.84–0.97, p = 0.006) and live birth rate (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82–0.97, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Therefore, dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation might increase miscarriage rate, but in terms of the laboratory and other pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate or live birth rate, there was no evidence to show that dual trigger was superior to an hCG-trigger alone for patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.

High physical activity and ovarian reserve: a prospective study of normo-ovulatory professional athletes

Background

This study investigated whether high physical activity affects ovarian reserve in normo-ovulatory, reproductive-age women.

Methods

This prospective, observational study compared 31 professional female athletes, with 31 women who did not engage in physical activity. It was conducted 2017–2020 in a tertiary medical center. Normo-ovulatory, professional athletes, ages 20–35 years were recruited from The Wingate Institute—the Israeli National Institute for Sport Excellence. They had high International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scores. Non-physically active women, matched by age and body mass index, were recruited from hospital staff. Women were evaluated for ovarian reserve markers on day 2–5 of the menstrual cycle, including follicular stimulating hormone, antral follicle count, anti-Mullerian hormone and Inhibin B.

Results

The average age of the high physical activity group was 29.9 ± 4.2 years and the nonactive group 31.6 ± 4.2 years (p = 0.062). Body mass index of both groups were similar (22.5 ± 5.0 vs. 21.4 ± 2.5, respectively; p = 0.1). No differences were observed with respect to follicle stimulating hormone (p = 0.12) and anti-Mullerian hormone (p = 0.16). A trend towards higher total antral follicle count in the high physical activity group vs. the non-active group (34.5 ± 12.9 vs. 28.1 ± 15.2, p = 0.08) and lower Inhibin B (68.1 ± 36.8 vs. 89.4 ± 46.1, p = 0.05). Menarche age correlated with anti-Mullerian hormone (r = 0.387, p = 0.003), as did total antral follicle count (r = 0.368, p = 0.004). IPAQ scores and basal follicle stimulating hormone levels were negatively correlated (r = − 0.292, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

Athletic, normo-ovulatory women have ovarian reserves that are at least as good as those of the general population. As this is the first study examining this issue, it could cautiously reassure women engaged in high physical activity regarding ovarian reserve.

Variation in Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels with Age in Women Accessing In Vitro Fertilization Services in Ghana

Background: The emergence of AMH as a reliable biomarker for assessing ovarian reserve and optimization of assisted reproductive technology (ART) remains a promising tool for the evaluation and prediction of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) outcomes. This study assessed the association between serum AMH levels and maternal age in females receiving in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment in Ghana. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at a specialized fertility center in Ghana. Descriptive analysis was performed, and the differences between maternal age and AMH categories were assessed by the Kruskal–Wallis test. Results: We included 426 women with mean (±SD) age and AMH levels of 35.25 ± 6.33 years and 2.80 ± 2.60 ng/mL, respectively. Women with very-low AMH levels (0.94 ± 73 ng/mL) were older (>40 years), whereas the younger (20–25 years) group had higher levels (4.85 ± 3.34 ng/mL). There was a significant negative correlation between women’s age and serum AMH levels (R = −0.46; p < 0.001). None of the younger women had AMH levels <0.30 ng/mL, while 70% of women who had AMH levels of <0.30 ng/mL were older women (>40years). In addition, none of the older women had AMH levels >4 ng/mL with only 5% having AMH levels between 2.20 and 4.0 ng/mL. Conclusions: AMH levels ≤0.3 ng/mL are archetypal of 70% of Ghanaian women >40 years old receiving fertility treatment. A combined assessment of AMH levels and age supports clinical decisions in predicting ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and may be valuable in predicting of IVF success. Further research to evaluate the combined use of age, AMH, and other ovarian reserve markers in assessing ovarian response to COS is recommended.

Assessment of Telomere Length and Mitochondrial DNA Copy Number in Granulosa Cells as Predictors of Aneuploidy Rate in Young Patients

Background: To identify the correlation among female age, cellular aging markers, and aneuploidy rate in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and the preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study recruiting 110 infertile women between August 2017 and July 2018. They were divided into young-age (<38 years, n = 60) and advanced-age (≥38 years, n = 50) groups. Peripheral leukocytes were assessed, and the granulosa cells were pooled during oocyte pickup. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number and telomere length (TL) were measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction. PGT-A was performed on the NGS platform. Results: mtDNA copy number and TL were positively correlated in both leukocytes (rho = 0.477, p < 0.001) and granulosa cells (rho = 0.361, p < 0.001), but the two parameters in leukocytes were not correlated with those in granulosa cells. In the young-age group, TL in the granulosa cells was the only factor correlated with the aneuploidy rate (rho = −0.283, p = 0.044), whereas in the advanced-age group, age was the main factor (rho = 0.358, p = 0.018). Conclusions: TL in the granulosa cells was negatively correlated with the aneuploidy rate in the young-age group, supporting the application of PGT-A in younger women.

Association of antimüllerian hormone with polycystic ovarian syndrome phenotypes and pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization cycles with fresh embryo transfer

Objective

The current study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes and to determine whether AMH is associated with pregnancy outcomes in infertile women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 2973 infertile women, including 418 women with PCOS undergoing their first IVF treatment at a private fertility center from January 2014 to March 2018. Women were stratified into three groups using cutoffs defined by the 25^th and 75^th percentiles of the serum AMH level: 746 women had AMH ≤ 2.25 ng/mL; 1486 women had AMH between 2.25 to 5.71 ng/mL; and 741 women had AMH > 5.71 ng/mL. Endocrine characteristics, PCOS phenotypes, stimulation outcomes, pregnancy outcomes were compared among these groups. When there were any statistical differences (P < 0.05) among the three groups, Bonferroni test was performed as post-hoc tests to determine where the statistical differences existed. To assess the relationships between AMH and pregnancy outcomes in total patients and PCOS patients, logistic regression analysis, adjusted for potential confounding covariates, were performed.

Results

Women with high AMH had greater prevalence of hyperandrogenism (HA), polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) and amenorrhea than women with low or average AMH. The clinical pregnancy rate were significantly higher in the high-AMH group compared with low- and average-AMH groups (69.9% vs. 58.8% and 64.7% respectively; P < 0.001). The live birth rate was significantly lower in women with AMH ≤ 2.25 ng/mL compared with average- and high-AMH groups (47.6% vs. 55.2 and 59.5% respectively; P < 0.001). However, after controlling for maternal age, oocyte yield, as well as other confounders, AMH was no longer associated with a higher live birth rate (aOR 1.037, 95% CI 0.853–1.261, P = 0.717; aOR 1.099, 95% CI 0.858–1.408, P = 0.455, respectively) and clinical pregnancy rate (aOR 1.064, 95% CI 0.834–1.359, P = 0.617; aOR 1.181, 95% CI 0.875–1.595, P = 0.276, respectively). Moreover, pregnancy outcomes did not differ in PCOS women according to AMH quartiles.

Conclusion

Increased AMH levels associated with PCOS severity and greater ovarian stimulation. However, AMH was not associated with clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate after controlling for other confounders in women undergoing IVF. Thus, AMH should not be used to alter clinical decisions and exclude patients based on a low or even undetectable AMH value.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04518-0.

Added value of anti-Müllerian hormone serum concentration in assisted reproduction clinical practice using highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG)

INTRODUCTION

The individual response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) depends on several factors, including the initial dose of gonadotropin. In repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, the initial dose of gonadotropin is mainly established on the basis of the previous attempts' outcomes. Conversely, in naive patients, the ovarian response should be estimated using other criteria, such as the serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). However, in clinical practice, the initial gonadotropin dose is not systematically adapted to the AMH level, despite the known relationship between AMH and ovarian reserve.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

French non-interventional, longitudinal, prospective, multicentre, cohort study that included infertile women who underwent COS with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (HP-hMG 600 IU/mL) during their first IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle. Data were collected prospectively during routine follow-up visits from COS initiation to 10-11 weeks after embryo transfer.

RESULTS

Data from 235 of the 297 enrolled women were used for the study. Serum AMH level was negatively correlated with the initial and total HP-hMG doses (p<0.001), and positively correlated with the number of retrieved oocytes (p<0.007). Embryos were obtained for 94.0% of women, and fresh embryo transfer was performed in 72.8% of them. The clinical pregnancy rate was 28.5% after the first embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION

Selecting the appropriate starting dose of gonadotropin is crucial to optimize the IVF/ICSI procedure. For the first attempt, the serum AMH level is a good biomarker to individualize treatment.

A randomised controlled trial to clinically validate follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen for ovarian stimulation in Asian IVF/ICSI patients

STUDY QUESTION

Is ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen at least as efficacious as follitropin alfa in a conventional dosing regimen in Asian population?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Ovarian stimulation with individualised follitropin delta dosing resulted in a non-inferior ongoing pregnancy rate, a significantly higher live birth rate and a significantly lower incidence of early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or preventive interventions compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Previous randomised controlled trials conducted in Japan as well as in Europe, North- and South America have demonstrated that ovarian stimulation with the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and body weight modulated the ovarian response and reduced the risk of OHSS without compromising pregnancy and live birth rates.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Randomised, controlled, multi-centre, assessor-blind trial conducted in 1009 Asian patients from mainland China, South Korea, Vietnam and Taiwan, undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Randomisation was stratified by age (<35, 35–37, 38–40 years). The primary endpoint was ongoing pregnancy rate assessed 10–11 weeks after embryo transfer in the fresh cycle (non-inferiority limit −10.0%; analysis adjusted for age stratum).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The follitropin delta treatment consisted of a fixed daily dose individualised according to each patient’s initial AMH level and body weight (AMH <15 pmol/l: 12 μg; AMH ≥15 pmol/l: 0.19 to 0.10 μg/kg; min-max 6–12 μg). The follitropin alfa dose was 150 IU/day for the first 5 days with subsequent potential dose adjustments according to individual response. A GnRH antagonist protocol was applied. OHSS was classified based on Golan’s system. Women with an ongoing pregnancy were followed until live birth and 4 weeks after.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly (P < 0.001) lower with individualised follitropin delta versus conventional follitropin alfa (10.0 ± 6.1 versus 12.4 ± 7.3). Nevertheless, compared to the conventional dosing approach, the individualised follitropin delta dosing regimen resulted in on average 2 more oocytes (9.6 ± 5.3 versus 7.6 ± 3.5) in potential low responders as indicated by AMH <15 pmol/l, and on average 3 fewer oocytes (10.1 ± 6.3 versus 13.8 ± 7.5) in potential high responders as indicated by AMH ≥15 pmol/l. Among women with AMH ≥15 pmol/l, excessive response occurred less frequently with individualised follitropin delta than with follitropin alfa (≥15 oocytes: 20.2% versus 39.1%; ≥20 oocytes: 6.7% versus 18.5%; both P < 0.001). The incidence of early OHSS and/or preventive interventions for early OHSS was significantly (P = 0.004) reduced from 9.6% with follitropin alfa to 5.0% with individualised follitropin delta. The total gonadotropin use was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced from an average of 109.9 ± 32.9 μg (1498 ± 448 IU) follitropin alfa to 77.5 ± 24.4 μg follitropin delta. Non-inferiority of follitropin delta in its individualised dosing regimen to conventional follitropin alfa was established with respect to the primary endpoint of ongoing pregnancy rate which was 31.3% with follitropin delta compared to 25.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 5.4% [95% CI: −0.2%; 11.0%]). The live birth rate was significantly higher at 31.3% with individualised follitropin delta compared to 24.7% with follitropin alfa (estimated mean difference 6.4% [95% CI: 0.9%; 11.9%]; P = 0.023). The live birth rate for each stratum were as follows for follitropin delta and follitropin alfa, respectively; <35 years: 31.0% versus 25.0%, 35–37 years: 35.3% versus 26.7%, 38–40 years: 20.0% versus 14.3%.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The trial only covered the clinical outcome of one treatment cycle with fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfers.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The present trial shows that in addition to reducing the early OHSS risk, follitropin delta in its individualised fixed-dose regimen has the potential to improve the success rate in fresh cycles across all ages and with a lower gonadotropin consumption compared to conventional follitropin alfa dosing.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.Q., Y.Z., X.L., T.H., H.-Y.H. and S.-H.K. have received institutional (not personal) clinical trial fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. M.G., B.M. and J.-C.A. are employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals. J.-C.A. has pending and issued patent applications in the WO 2013/020996 and WO 2019/043143 patent families that comprise allowed and granted patent rights related to follitropin delta.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03296527 (clinicaltrials.gov).

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

28 September 2017

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

1 December 2017

Anti-Müllerian hormone as a qualitative marker - or just quantity?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we will summarize research looking into anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as a measure of oocyte quality.

RECENT FINDINGS

AMH is a key factor involved in embryogenesis but also in the development of early follicles. Owing to its relatively small inter and intracycle variability, it has become a widely used method of ovarian reserve testing. In the realm of assisted reproductive technology, it has demonstrated a reliable ability to gauge the number of oocytes obtained during an in-vitro fertilization cycle. For these purposes, AMH is a readily measured quantitative tool. However, its qualitative role is as yet undefined.

SUMMARY

Although levels of this hormone have been associated with fertilization, blastulation, implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates, there is no clear link with live-birth rates. Furthermore, AMH levels do not appear to correspond with risk of fetal trisomy. AMH does show significant predictive value for the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency and time to onset of menopause.

Individualized follitropin delta dosing reduces OHSS risk in Japanese IVF/ICSI patients: a randomized controlled trial

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study aimed to establish the efficacy and safety of ovarian stimulation with a follitropin delta individualized fixed-dose regimen based on serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration and body weight versus conventional follitropin beta dosing in Japanese women.

DESIGN

This randomized, controlled, assessor-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority trial was conducted in 347 Japanese IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients. They were randomized to individualized follitropin delta (AMH <15 pmol/l: 12 µg/day; AMH ≥15 pmol/l: 0.10-0.19 µg/kg/day; minimum 6 µg/day; maximum 12 µg/day) or conventional follitropin beta (150 IU/day for the first 5 days, with potential subsequent dose adjustments). The primary end-point was the number of oocytes retrieved with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin (-3.0 oocytes).

RESULTS

The primary trial objective was met, as non-inferiority was established for number of oocytes retrieved for individualized follitropin delta dosing compared with conventional follitropin beta dosing (9.3 versus 10.5; lower boundary of 95% confidence interval -2.3). The occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was reduced to approximately half with individualized compared with conventional dosing, with an incidence of 11.2% versus 19.8% (P = 0.021) for OHSS of any grade and 7.1% versus 14.1% (P = 0.027) for moderate/severe OHSS. The live birth rate per started cycle was 23.5% for individualized dosing and 18.6% for conventional dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing with individualized follitropin delta in Japanese women is non-inferior to conventional dosing with follitropin beta for number of oocytes retrieved. The individualized approach shows a favourable benefit-risk profile, providing a statistically significant and clinically relevant reduction in the incidence of OHSS, without compromising live birth rates.

Influence of age on response to controlled ovarian stimulation in women with low levels of serum anti-Müllerian hormone

This study aims at detecting and evaluating differences in quantitative response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with high doses of gonadotropins in women with low serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). About 369 first cycles in a real-life scenario in women between 21 and 43 years old and with AMH ≤0.9 ng/ml were analyzed. Older women had a significantly worse outcome with respect to young women, not only qualitatively, but also in terms of quantitative ovarian response to COS [odd ratio (OR) to obtain at least three MII oocytes with each increasing year of female age: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.85 - 0.94; p < .001]. This study endorses that age is a significant factor when counseling patients with low AMH. AMH levels per se are not a reason to exclude patients from a COS treatment, since pregnancy and live birth can be achieved, especially in younger patients. However, with an AMH equally low, the ovarian response worsens with age, making questionable the effectiveness of a stimulation with high-dose gonadotropins in the older subgroup.

Prediction of metaphase II oocytes according to different levels of serum AMH in poor responders using the antagonist protocol during ICSI: a cohort study

The aim of our study was to assess the value of serum AMH in prediction of metaphase II oocytes in poor responders. We performed a prospective cohort study included 206 poor responders candidate for ICSI using antagonist protocol. They were classified into 3 groups. Group I included 50 women with AMH < 0.3 ng/ml, group II included 85 women with AMH 0.3-0.7 ng/ml and group III included 71 women with AMH > 0.7-1.0 ng/ml. The primary outcome parameter was the number of MII oocytes. There was a highly significant difference between the study groups regarding E2 at triggering (481.41 ± 222.653, 648.17 ± 264.353 and 728.74 ± 305.412 respectively, number of oocyte retrieved (2.37 ± 1.178, 3.38 ± 1.622 and 3.80 ± 1.427 respectively), number of MII oocytes (1.66 ± 1.039, 2.35 ± 1.171 and 2.61 ± 1.080 respectively), number of fertilized oocytes (1.39 ± 0.919, 1.91 ± 0.983 and 2.21 ± 0.937 respectively), , total number of embryos (1.34 ± 0.938, 1.76 ± 0.956 and 2.09 ± 0.907 respectively), clinical pregnancy rates (4.9 vs. 7.7 and 19.7% respectively). We concluded that AMH is a good predictor for number of MII oocytes in poor responders undergoing ICSI.

Randomized, assessor-blinded trial comparing highly purified human menotropin and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in high responders undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of highly purified human menotropin (HP-hMG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) for controlled ovarian stimulation in a population of patients predicted to be high responders.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group, noninferiority trial.

SETTING

Fertility centers.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 620 women with serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) ≥5 ng/mL.

INTERVENTION(S)

Controlled ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or rFSH in a GnRH antagonist assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle. Fresh transfer of a single blastocyst was performed unless ovarian response was excessive, in which all embryos were cryopreserved. Subjects could undergo subsequent frozen blastocyst transfer within 6 months of randomization.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) after fresh transfer (primary endpoint), as well as cumulative live birth, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), and pregnancy loss rates.

RESULTS

OPR/cycle start after fresh transfer was 35.5% with HP-hMG and 30.7% with rFSH (difference: 4.7%, 95% CI -2.7%, 12.1%); noninferiority was established. Compared to rFSH, HP-hMG was associated with significantly lower OHSS (21.4% vs. 9.7% respectively; difference: -11.7%, 95% CI -17.3%, -6.1%) and cumulative early pregnancy loss rates (25.5% vs. 14.5% respectively; difference: -11.0%, 95% CI -18.8%, -3.14%). Despite 43 more transfers in the rFSH group, cumulative live birth rates were similar with HP-hMG and rFSH at 50.6% and 51.5% respectively (difference: -0.8%, 95% CI -8.7%, 7.1%).

CONCLUSION(S)

In high responders, HP-hMG provided comparable efficacy to rFSH with fewer adverse events, including pregnancy loss, suggesting its optimized risk/benefit profile in this population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02554279 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Establishing the follitropin delta dose that provides a comparable ovarian response to 150 IU/day follitropin alfa

RESEARCH QUESTION

The objective of this investigation was to determine the daily follitropin delta dose (µg) providing a similar ovarian response to 150 IU/day follitropin alfa.

DESIGN

The study was a post-hoc analysis of ovarian response in 1591 IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients undergoing ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in two recent randomized, assessor-blind, controlled trials in the development programme for follitropin delta: a phase II dose-response trial with a reference arm of a fixed daily dose of 150 IU follitropin alfa throughout stimulation, and a phase III efficacy trial with a comparator arm of 150 IU/day follitropin alfa as a starting dose.

RESULTS

Daily follitropin delta doses of 10.0 µg (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.9-12.8) and 10.3 µg (95% CI 9.7-10.8) yielded the same number of oocytes as 150 IU/day follitropin alfa for all patients participating in the phase II and III trials, respectively. When analysing patients with either normal or high ovarian reserve (based on serum anti-Mullerian hormone ≥15 pmol/l) and no dose changes, the same number of oocytes was obtained with 150 IU/day follitropin alfa and daily doses of follitropin delta of 9.7 µg (95% CI 7.5-12.4) and 9.3 µg (95% CI 8.6-10.1) in the two trials. Daily follitropin delta doses in the range 9.5-10.4 µg were consistently estimated to correspond to 150 IU/day follitropin alfa for serum oestradiol concentration and number of follicles ≥12 mm at the end of stimulation across analysis populations in the phase III trial.

CONCLUSIONS

A daily follitropin delta dose of 10 µg provides a similar ovarian response to 150 IU/day follitropin alfa in IVF/ICSI patients.

The impact of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) on multiple pronuclei (PN) presence and oocyte maturity in ICSI treatments

This prospective study was designed to investigate whether anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are associated with the presence of multiple pronuclei in zygotes as well as with the ovarian response, fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in ICSI cycles. A total of 413 patients undergoing ICSI cycles were included in the study. The assessment included 3084 MII oocytes. Serum AMH measurements were performed at the first initial presence of the patient. The outcome measures were the presence of multiple pronuclei (PN), a number of retrieved oocytes, number of mature/immature oocytes, fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy. Obtained results showed a statistically significant correlation between AMH levels and maternal age, the number of follicles, the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes, mature and immature oocyte, fertilization rate and pregnancy rate. Linear regression analysis showed that AMH significantly correlates with the presence of multiple pronuclei in the zygote. The further analysis confirmed that the number of zygotes with the presence of multiple pronuclei increased when AMH levels were higher. This is the first examination of the prognostic value of the serum AMH on the presence of multiple pronuclei in the zygote and our data in the preliminary study suggest that AMH levels could be used as a predictive marker.

Fertility Preservation for Adolescent Transgender Male Patients: A Case Series

This case series from a hospital-based academic in vitro fertilization clinic outlines the feasibility of oocyte cryopreservation for transgender male adolescents after varying degrees of exposure to pubertal blockers and/or testosterone. A description of each patient's oocyte cryopreservation cycle is reviewed, including prior exposure to pubertal blockers and/or testosterone, anti-Mullerian hormone level, stimulation medications, trigger injections, number of oocytes retrieved and cryopreserved, and complications. All patients tolerated stimulation and retrieval well and had mature oocytes cryopreserved in each cycle. There were no complications. Adolescent transgender males who choose to undergo oocyte cryopreservation tolerate the process well, reinforcing the importance of fertility preservation in providing comprehensive care for transgender patients.

Performance of prognostic modelling of high and low ovarian response to ovarian stimulation for IVF

STUDY QUESTION

What is the performance of previously established regression models in predicting low and high ovarian response to 150 μg corifollitropin alfa/GnRH-antagonist ovarian stimulation in an independent dataset?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The outcome of ovarian stimulation with 150 μg corifollitropin alfa in a fixed, multiple dose GnRH-antagonist protocol can be validly predicted using logistic regression models with AMH being of paramount importance.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Predictors of ovarian response have been identified in FSH/GnRH agonist protocols as well as ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa/GnRH-antagonist. Multivariable response models have been established already, however, external validation of model performance has so far been lacking.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Data from a prospective, multi-centre (n = 5), multi-national, investigator-initiated, observational cohort study were analysed. Infertile women (n = 211), body weight >60 kg, were undergoing ovarian stimulation with 150 μg corifollitropin alfa in a GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol for transvaginal oocyte retrieval for IVF. Demographic, sonographic and endocrine parameters were prospectively assessed on cycle Day 2 or 3 of spontaneous menstruation before ovarian stimulation. Main outcomes were low (<6 oocytes) and high (>18 oocytes) ovarian response.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Firstly, previously established prediction models for low ovarian response (LOR) and high ovarian response (HOR) were tested using the original parameters. Secondly, re-estimated parameters generated from the present data were tested on the established models. Thirdly, for the development of new predictive models of both LOR and HOR, several logistic regression models were estimated. Resulting prediction models were compared by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and bias-corrected Akaike's Information Criterion (AICc) to identify the most reasonable model for each scenario.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The previously established prediction models for low and high response performed remarkably well on this dataset (low response AUC 0.8879 (95% CI: 0.8185-0.9573) and high response AUC 0.8909 (95% CI: 0.8251-0.9568)). A newly developed simplified model for LOR with log-transformed AMH values and only age as another covariate showed an AUC of 0.8920 (95% CI: 0.8237-0.9603) with the lowest AICc of all models compared. For predicting HOR, we suggest a simplified model using AMH, FSH and AFC (AUC of 0.8976, 95% CI: 0.8206-0.9746).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

All analyses were done on data from women with a body weight >60 kg. The newly developed simplified models may suffer from overfitting and need to be tested in further independent data sets.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Patient selection for ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa should utilize established response prediction models. The clinical impact of this needs to be evaluated in future studies.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was funded by university funds. M.O.S., T.L. and I.R.K. have nothing to declare. G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, Abbott, Marckryl Pharma, VitroLife, NMC Healthcare, ReprodWissen, ZIVA and BioSilu.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Comparison of antral follicle count and serum anti Müllerian hormone level for determination of gonadotropin dosing in in-vitro fertilization: randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation when gonadotropin dosing was determined based on antral follicle count (AFC) vs serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.

METHODS

This was a randomized double-blind trial carried out in a university-affiliated assisted reproduction unit. A total of 200 women undergoing their first IVF cycle using the GnRH-antagonist protocol between April 2016 and February 2018 were randomized to determination of gonadotropin dosing based on either AFC or serum AMH level measured in the pretreatment cycle 1 month before the IVF cycle. Patients underwent IVF as per our center's standard protocol. The proportion of subjects achieving a desired ovarian response, defined as retrieval of six to 14 oocytes, was compared between the two study arms. Subgroup analysis of patients with baseline AFC > 5 and those with baseline AFC ≤ 5 was performed. Concordance in AFC and AMH categorization between the pretreatment cycle and the ovarian-stimulation cycle was assessed using Cohen's kappa (κ).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving a desired ovarian response between the AFC (54%) and AMH (49%) groups (P = 0.479). The median number of oocytes retrieved was nine vs seven (P = 0.070), and the median follicular output rate was 0.54 vs 0.55 (P = 0.764) in the AFC and AMH groups, respectively. Similar findings were observed on subgroup analysis of subjects with AFC ≤ 5 and AFC > 5 at the start of ovarian stimulation (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). There was moderate concordance between AFC and AMH measured in the pretreatment cycle and the stimulation cycle (κ = 0.478 and 0.587, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of women achieving a desired ovarian response following ovarian stimulation using the GnRH-antagonist protocol is similar when the gonadotropin-dosing algorithm used is based on AFC or serum AMH level. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Endometriosis reduces ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation independent of AMH, AFC, and women's age measured by follicular output rate (FORT) and number of oocytes retrieved

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of endometriosis on the ovarian response during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation measured by number of oocytes retrieved and the follicular output rate (FORT).

METHODS

A retrospective, single center study included 96 women, who underwent ICSI treatments for male factor infertility according to World Health Organisation between 2016 until 2018. A total of 96 patients were included in the study with 205 fresh ICSI cycles. The study group included 26 patients with endometriosis after surgical and medical treatment; the control group included 70 patients without endometriosis. The women with endometriosis underwent 47 and the control group 158 ICSI cycles. Women underwent fresh intracytoplasmatic sperm injection cycles after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation following a GnRH-antagonist protocol. The FORT was calculated as the ratio of pre-ovulatory follicle count × 100/small antral follicle count at baseline.

RESULTS

A lower number of retrieved oocytes (5.89 vs. 7.25, p = 0.045), lower FORT (75.67 vs. 94.63, p = 0.046), lower number of metaphase II oocytes (4.87 vs. 6.04, p = 0.046), and lower fertilization rate after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (40.61 vs. 57.76, p = 0.003) were found in women with endometriosis compared to women without endometriosis. The number of oocyctes retrieved was 0.71 lower in the group with endometriosis than in the group without (p = 0.026). The FORT was 24.55% lower in the group with endometriosis (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Endometriosis reduces the FORT and the number of metaphase-II oocytes after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation independly of women's age, antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone.

Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Fertility Preservation: Clinical and Therapeutic Applications

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is a member of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta family and a key regulator of sexual differentiation and folliculogenesis. While the serum AMH level has been used in reproductive medicine as a biomarker of quantitative ovarian reserve for more than 20 years, new potential therapeutic applications of recombinant AMH are emerging, notably in the field of oncofertility. Indeed, it is well known that chemotherapy, used to treat cancer, induces ovarian follicular depletion and subsequent infertility. Animal models have been used widely to understand the effects of different cytotoxic agents on ovarian function, and several hypotheses regarding chemotherapy gonadotoxicity have been proposed, that is, it might have a direct detrimental effect on the primordial follicles constituting the ovarian reserve and/or on the pool of growing follicles secreting AMH. Recently, a new mechanism of chemotherapy-induced follicular depletion, called the “burn-out effect,” has been proposed. According to this theory, chemotherapeutic agents may lead to a massive growth of dormant follicles which are then destroyed. As AMH is one of the factors regulating the recruitment of primordial follicles from the ovarian reserve, recombinant AMH administration concomitant with chemotherapy might limit follicular depletion, therefore representing a promising option for preserving fertility in women suffering from cancer. This review reports on the potential usefulness of AMH measurement as well as AMH’s role as a therapeutic agent in the field of female fertility preservation.

Is a woman's chronological age or 'ovarian age' more important in determining perinatal outcome after assisted reproductive treatment?

Ovarian reserve (OR) decreases as women get older but there is considerable variation in the rate at which this occurs. Older women are at increased risk of complications during pregnancy. The aim of the study was to determine whether poor OR influences perinatal outcomes independent of age. All fresh IVF/ICSI cycles in which a single embryo was transferred between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016 were reviewed. An anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentration of ≤5.4 pmol/l was considered poor and 5.41-24.99 pmol/l normal. Data were collected regarding cycle outcome, congenital anomalies, gestational age at delivery and birth weight. A total of 1520 women were included, of whom 1197 had normal OR and the remaining 323 had poor OR. Once pregnant, after adjusting for maternal age, women with poor OR (n = 109) were no more likely to experience a biochemical pregnancy or miscarriage (41.3% versus 41.6%, p = 0.809) than women with normal OR (n = 596). There were no significant differences in rates of congenital anomalies (1.8% versus 1.2%, p = 0.636), birth weight (3272 ± 630.7 g versus 3376.4 ± 576.3 g, p = 0.216) or gestational age at delivery (38.9 ± 2.3 weeks versus 39.1 ± 2.1 weeks, p = 0.517) between women with normal or poor OR. OR does not appear to affect pregnancy loss rates, incidence of congenital anomalies, birth weight, or gestational age at delivery after adjusting for maternal age.

Latent genital tuberculosis adversely affects the ovarian reserve in infertile women

STUDY QUESTION

What is the effect of latent genital tuberculosis (GTB) on ovarian reserve in infertile women?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Women with latent GTB have lower ovarian reserves and yield lower numbers of oocytes in IVF.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Limited evidence suggests that women with GTB may have a low ovarian reserve. Infertile women have a high incidence of latent GTB and treatment improves fertility outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This prospective study from February 2013 to January 2016 compared 431 infertile women diagnosed with latent GTB (Group I) to 453 infertile women without latent GTB (Group II).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study was conducted at Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India, a tertiary referral centre for infertility. Women of both groups were 21-38 years of age. Group I consisted of infertile women with proven tubal patency but with latent GTB diagnosed by DNA PCR testing of an endometrial biopsy. Day 2-4 anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) were assessed in both groups. All women with latent GTB took antituberculosis therapy (ATT). Gonadotropin dosages and oocyte and embryo details were noted in both groups for those who underwent IVF.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Women with latent GTB were younger (29.8 ± 4.4 years vs. 30.8 ± 4.5 years; P = 0.003) and, following adjustment for age, had significantly lower AMH [Median (IQR): 2 (0.9, 4.1) ng/ml vs 2.8 (1.3, 5) ng/ml; P = 0.01] and AFC [Median (IQR): 7 (5, 11) vs 8 (5, 14); P < 0.001]. Post ATT, women with latent GTB yielded fewer oocytes (9.3 ± 7.6 vs. 10.9 ± 8.1; P = 0.01), but had more grade I embryos transferred (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 0.89 ± 1.0; P = 0.001) and a better implantation rate (26.8% vs. 17.5%; P = 0.004) in IVF compared to women in Group II. Group I had a higher pregnancy rate compared to Group II (51.6% vs. 40.5%; P = 0.001), through various treatment modalities. Considering the adequacy of the sample size and use of robust ovarian reserve markers, the role of chance is minimal.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study is limited to an infertile population visiting a tertiary referral centre. The mechanisms by which latent GTB infection would lead to ovarian damage are unclear.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

It is believed that latent GTB is without any clinical significance. However, a low ovarian reserve in young women with latent GTB necessitates considering it as a cause of infertility, in women with prolonged infertility. These women may experience an accelerated decline in ovarian reserve with reduced success in achieving biological parenthood. Clinicians must be aware of this condition and its consequences while managing infertility.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was funded by Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic, Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

A randomized controlled trial of AMH-based individualized FSH dosing in a GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF

STUDY QUESTION

Does an individualized serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) based FSH dosing algorithm used in a GnRH antagonist protocol increase the proportion of patients with an intended number of oocytes (5–14) retrieved compared with a standard regimen?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The AMH-based individualized algorithm did not increase the proportion of patients with an intended oocyte retrieval.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Individualizing treatment for ovarian stimulation by serum AMH or antral follicle count can theoretically improve the ratio between benefits and risks. Current data suggest that there may be a reduced risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), but without improved pregnancy or live birth rates. Only two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the potential of AMH-based algorithms to optimize the FSH dosing in ovarian stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A dual-center open-label investigator-driven RCT was conducted between January 2013 and November 2016. Eligibility was assessed in 269 women and 221 were randomized 2:1 between individualized and standard dosing groups. Women with pretreatment serum AMH > 24 pmol/L had 100 IU/day of recombinant FSH (rFSH); AMH 12–24 pmol/L had 150 IU/day of rFSH, and AMH < 12 pmol/L had maximal stimulation with corifollitropin 100 or 150 mg depending on bodyweight ±60 kg. The standard group had 150 IU/day of rFSH irrespective of pretreatment AMH. All patients followed the GnRH-antagonist protocol.

The sample size calculation assumed that individualized dosing by AMH would reduce the proportion of unintended oocyte yield (outside the 5–14 range) by 50%, from 35 to 17.5%. In a 2:1 randomization this required 216 patients: 144 in the individualized and 72 patients in the standard group (80% power, 5% significance).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All women had a presumed ovulatory normal menstrual cycle, were aged 25–38 years, weighed < 75 kg, had pretreatment AMH 4–40 pmol/L, did their first IVF or ICSI cycle and had two ovaries accessible to oocyte retrieval. Recruitment was conducted from both participating sites. Women were excluded if diagnosed with anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis grade III/IV, hydrosalpings on ultrasound, recurrent miscarriages (≥3), FSH > 12 IU/L or major medical disorders.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

After randomization 149 women were allocated to the individualized group and 72 to the standard group. The primary outcome of women with an intended (5–14) number of oocytes retrieved was similar in the individualized (n = 105) versus the standard (n = 55) rFSH treatment group (72% [95% CI 64–79%] versus 78% [95% CI 67–86%], respectively, P = 0.68, between group standardized mean difference (SMD) −6%, 95% CI: −19–8%). In the high AMH stratum of the individualized group, significantly more women (n = 13) had an unintended low number of oocytes (<5) retrieved (38% [95% CI: 23–55%]) compared with the standard group (6% [95% CI 0.3–24%], P = 0.029, between group SMD 32%, 95% CI: 9–56%). Conversely, in the low pretreatment AMH stratum, individualized dosing using corifollitropin reduced the proportion of unintended low responders to 24% (95% CI: 12–40%) compared with 47% (95% CI: 26–69%) in the standard group, P = 0.10, between group SMD −23% (95% CI: −54–8%). OHSS was diagnosed in four women (two in each study arm), and all cases were mild. Daily luteal phase questionnaire reporting showed similar wellbeing in terms of abdominal distention, abdominal pain, dyspnea and occurrence of bleeding between groups. The cumulative live birth rate per started cycle was similar (32 and 35%) comparing the individualized with the standard group.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was powered for showing differences only in the distribution of oocyte retrieval when comparing individualized and standard groups, therefore additional results should be viewed with caution. In addition, there was a change of AMH assay halfway through the study period and the possibility that corifollitropin being introduced to a subgroup of the intervention has introduced confounding cannot be ruled out.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS

In the expected high responder AMH stratum, 100 IU/day is an insufficient rFSH dose in a high proportion of patients. Further research might explore the 125 IU/day dose for the high AMH segment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None for the submitted work. ICMJE declared personal interests for two of the authors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EUDRACT registration number: 2012-004969-40.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

27 November 2012.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT

10 January 2013.

Anti-müllerian Hormone for the Prediction of Ovarian Response in Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol for IVF

Background: The ability of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) to predict ovarian response has been studied extensively in gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and antagonist treatments, but no information is available regarding its value in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol. Methods: This retrospective data analysis included 523 patients without polycystic ovary syndrome who underwent their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle with PPOS protocol at our center between Jan. 2015 and Jul. 2018. Serum AMH measurements were acquired within 12 months prior to ovarian stimulation using the automated Access AMH assay. Results: AMH exhibited a significantly positive correlation with the number of retrieved oocytes (r = 0.744, P < 0.001). For the prediction of poor (<4 oocytes) and high (>15 oocytes) response, AMH had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.861 and 0.773, corresponding with an optimal cutoff point of 1.26 and 4.34 ng/mL, respectively. When stratified according to the dose of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) (4 mg vs. 10 mg per day), AMH retained its similarly high predictive value for poor (AUC = 0.829 and 0.886, respectively) and high response (AUC = 0.770 and 0.814, respectively) in both groups. Amongst the 314 women who received their first frozen embryo transfer (FET) following PPOS protocol, no significant differences were observed on the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, implantation, early miscarriage, multiple pregnancy and ectopic pregnancy (all P > 0.05) across AMH quartiles (≤1.43, 1.44-2.55, 2.56-4.35, >4.35 ng/mL). In a multivariable logistic regression model, age was suggested to be the only independent risk factor for clinical pregnancy (P = 0.011). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that AMH is an adequate predictor of both high and poor ovarian response in PPOS protocol regardless of MPA dose, but it does not associate with pregnancy outcomes in the first FET cycles in a freeze-all strategy.

Gonadotropins and Their Analogs: Current and Potential Clinical Applications

The gonadotropin receptors LH receptor and FSH receptor play a central role in governing reproductive competency/fertility. Gonadotropin hormone analogs have been used clinically for decades in assisted reproductive therapies and in the treatment of various infertility disorders. Though these treatments are effective, the clinical protocols demand multiple injections, and the hormone preparations can lack uniformity and stability. The past two decades have seen a drive to develop chimeric and modified peptide analogs with more desirable pharmacokinetic profiles, with some displaying clinical efficacy, such as corifollitropin alfa, which is now in clinical use. More recently, low-molecular-weight, orally active molecules with activity at gonadotropin receptors have been developed. Some have excellent characteristics in animals and in human studies but have not reached the market-largely as a result of acquisitions by large pharma. Nonetheless, such molecules have the potential to mitigate risks currently associated with gonadotropin-based fertility treatments, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and the demands of injection-based therapies. There is also scope for novel use beyond the current remit of gonadotropin analogs in fertility treatments, including application as novel contraceptives; in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome; in the restoration of function to inactivating mutations of gonadotropin receptors; in the treatment of ovarian and prostate cancers; and in the prevention of bone loss and weight gain in postmenopausal women. Here we review the properties and clinical application of current gonadotropin preparations and their analogs, as well as the development of novel orally active, small-molecule nonpeptide analogs.

Association of progesterone production with serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in assisted reproductive technology cycles with corifollitropin alfa

The use of corifollitropin alfa (CA) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles is dependent on the antral follicle count and body weight of patients. The present study investigated the safety and efficacy of using 100μg of CA in predicted excessive responders based on serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) level. The results of 381 ART cycles stimulated by CA versus daily recombinant follicle-stimulation hormone (rFSH) in patients with low (<1.0 ng/mL; n = 38 vs. n = 90), moderate (1.0–3.36 ng/mL; n = 38 vs. n = 95), and high (> 3.36 ng/mL; n = 48 vs. n = 72) serum AMH levels, were analyzed. Pregnancy and live birth rates did not significantly differ between CA and daily rFSH groups. In the patients with high AMH levels, serum progesterone (P4) levels on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection were significantly lower in the CA group than in the rFSH group (0.93 ± 0.55 vs. 1.16 ± 0.64 ng/mL). Furthermore, serum P4 levels on the day of hCG injection were negatively correlated with baseline AMH levels in the CA group, but not in the rFSH group, in the patients with high AMH levels. In conclusion, the use of 100 μg of CA in patients with high AMH levels is safe and effective and is associated with a lower P4 level on the day of hCG injection compared with the use of daily rFSH.

GnRH agonist long protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol for various aged patients with diminished ovarian reserve: A retrospective study

This retrospective analysis compared the efficiency of the gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol and the GnRH agonist long (GnRH-a) protocol for patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). A total of 1,233 patients with DOR (anti-Mullerian hormone <1.1 ng/mL) were recruited for this retrospective case-control study. They were divided into two groups according to female age. Younger patients were assigned to POSEIDON group3 (PG3: age ≤35 years); older patients were assigned to POSEIDON group 4 (PG4: age >35 years). All patients with DOR underwent controlled ovarian stimulation and fresh embryo transfer (ET) on day 3. We recruited 283 GnRH-a and 54 GnRH-ant cycles for PG3, and 663 GnRH-a and 233 GnRH-ant cycles for PG4. In PG3, the GnRH-a protocol was associated with a lower ET cancellation rate (30/283 = 10.2% vs. 12/54 = 22.2%, p = 0.018) and a higher live birth rate (7/54 = 13.0% vs. 78/283 = 27.6%, p = 0.024) than the GnRH-ant protocol for the initiated cycles. Furthermore, the GnRH-a protocol was correlated with a higher implantation rate than the GnRH-ant protocol for ET cycles (146/577 = 25.3% vs. 11/103 = 10.7%, P = 0.027). No differences in the ET cancellation rate, live birth rate and implantation rate between GnRH-a and GnRH-ant groups were observed among PG4 patients. In conclusion, the GnRH-a protocol was more effective than the GnRH-ant protocol for young patients with DOR. The low ET cancellation rate and high implantation rate may be related to embryo quality or endometrial receptivity, which warrant further investigation.

Endometriosis and ART: A prior history of surgery for OMA is associated with a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation

Background

Many women whose fertility may have been impaired by endometriosis require assisted reproductive technology (ART) in order to become pregnant. However, the influence of ovarian endometriosis (OMA) on ovarian responsiveness to hyperstimulation has not been clearly established.

Objective

To evaluate the risk of a poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation and ART outcomes in women with OMA.

Materials and methods

We conducted a large observational controlled matched cohort study in a tertiary care university hospital between 01/10/2012 and 31/12/2015. After matching by age and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, 201 infertile women afflicted with OMA (the OMA group) and 402 disease-free women (the control group) undergoing an ART procedure were included in the study. The main outcomes that we measured were a POR to hyperstimulation (i.e., ≤ 3 oocytes retrieved, or cancelled cycles), the clinical pregnancy rate, and the live birth rate.

All of the women with endometriosis underwent a pre-ART work-up, in order to obtain an accurate diagnosis and staging of their disease. An OMA diagnosis was based on published imaging criteria (obtained by transvaginal sonography or magnetic resonance imaging) or on histological analysis for patients with a prior history of endometriosis surgery. The statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

The incidence of a POR to hyperstimulation was significantly higher for the OMA group than for the control group [62/201 (30.8%) versus 90/402 (22.3%), respectively; p = 0.02]. However, no significant differences were found between the OMA and the control group in terms of the clinical pregnancy rate [53/151 (35%) versus 134/324 (41.3%), respectively; p = 0.23] and the live birth rate [39/151 (25.8%) versus 99/324 (30.5%), respectively; p = 0.33]. By multivariate analysis, a prior history of surgery for OMA was found to be an independent factor associated with a POR to stimulation [OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1–4.0], unlike OMA without a prior history of surgery [OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.9–2.2].

Conclusion

The presence of OMA during ART treatment increased the risk of a POR to hyperstimulation, although the live birth rate was not affected. Furthermore, having OMA and having previously undergone surgery for OMA was identified as an independent risk factor for a POR.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induces luteinized unruptured follicle syndrome in young female juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients

To assess prospectively luteinized unruptured follicle (LUF) syndrome in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients with and without non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and healthy controls. Twenty-three adolescent and young adult female JIA patients (ILAR criteria) and 11 female healthy subjects were studied by pelvic ultrasound monitoring for follicular development and ovulation in one menstrual cycle. LUF syndrome was prospectively investigated by pelvic ultrasound with a dominant ovarian follicle without signs of follicular rupture, with elevation of serum progesterone in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and luteinizing hormone (LH) detected in the urine. Comparison between JIA patients with (n = 8) vs. without NSAIDs (n = 15) and healthy controls (n = 11) revealed that LUF syndrome was significantly higher in the former group (2 (25%) vs. 0% vs. 0%, p = 0.049). These two patients with LUF syndrome had normal menstrual cycles without reduced ovarian reserve, and they were under naproxen 500 mg bid during the menstrual cycle. Disease duration was comparable in JIA with and without NSAIDs [19.8 (4.4-25) vs. 13 (3.1-33) years, p = 0.232]. Further comparison between JIA patients with and without NSAIDs and healthy controls showed similar mean anti-Müllerian hormone levels (p = 0.909), estradiol (p = 0.436), FSH (p = 0.662), LH (p = 0.686), and mean antral follicle count (p = 0.240) and ovarian volume (p = 0.363). No differences were evidenced in three groups regarding Caucasian race, body mass index, duration, and length of menstrual cycles (p > 0.05). This is the first study to identify that JIA patients have a high frequency of LUF without impaired ovarian reserve. Future prospective studies are necessary to determine if chronic/continuous use of NSAIDs in JIA will have an impact in these patients' fertility.

Low dose HP-hMG in an antagonist protocol for IVF in ovulatory and anovulatory patients with high AMH

Women with high-AMH levels have an increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Studies have suggested that highly purified menotropin (HP-hMG) Menopur® reduces the risk. We, therefore, studied use of low-dose (112.5 IU/day) HP-hMG in ovulatory and anovulatory patients with high AMH (>32 pmol/L). The primary endpoint was the distribution of patients with appropriate, excessive, and inadequate response (5-14, ≥15, and ≤4 oocytes). Another endpoint was frequency of OHSS. Totally 115 women were included and 78 (67.8%) had an appropriate, 8 (7.0%) an excessive, and 29 (25.2%) an inadequate response. The number of oocytes was independent on AMH levels and ovulatory status but declined significantly with increasing bodyweight (R² = 0.07, p < .01). The ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle was 47.0%. Three (2.6%) developed OHSS, two had cancelation of the cycle and seven patients had GnRH agonist triggering to prevent OHSS. Selective use of a low dose of HP-hMG in patients with high levels of AMH provides 5-14 oocytes in more than two-thirds of the patients and is safe with low risk of OHSS. The number of aspirated oocytes was independent of AMH levels and ovulatory status, but inversely related to body weight.

Anti-müllerian hormone levels are associated with live birth rates in ART, but the predictive ability of anti-müllerian hormone is modest

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the association between serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) level and cumulative live birth rates (LBR) in patients undergoing their first in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycle, and to compare serum AMH levels with Antral Follicle Count (AFC) and Ovarian Sensitivity Index (OSI) as predictors of live birth.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study of 454 patients under the age of 40 and with a regular menstrual cycle of 21-35 days, undergoing their first IVF treatment cycles between September 2010 and June 2015. Participants were divided into three groups based on their AMH level, (AMH ≤10, AMH 10-<30 and AMH ≥30 pmol/l). Any difference in AMH-distribution between patients with or without live birth was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney-test, and live birth rates were compared between groups by a chi-squared test for linear trend. The ability of AMH, OSI and AFC as predictors of live birth was assessed by a receiver operating characteristics-analysis and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Patients with live birth had a higher AMH, median (range) 26 [0-137] pmol/l, compared with patients without live birth, AMH 22 [0-154] pmol/l, p = 0.035. Mean live birth rate (SD) was 0.36 (0.48) in the total cohort, 0.26 (0.44) in AMH-group <10, 0.34 (0.48) in AMH-group 10-<30, and 0.41(0.49) in AMH-group ≥30. Thus live birth rates increased with 8% per AMH-group (95% CI: 0.02 -0.14, p = 0.015). The AUC for AFC was 0.56, for AMH 0.57 and for OSI 0.63, respectively.

CONCLUSION

AMH concentration in serum is associated with live birth rates after IVF. Our results suggest that both AMH, AFC and OSI have an equal but modest predictive ability in relation to live birth rate.

Effectiveness of Anti-Mullerian Hormone-tailored Protocol Compared to Conventional Protocol in Women Undergoing In vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background:

Assessment of ovarian reserve before an in vitro fertilization cycle (IVF) is one among the many factors that predicts a successful cycle. Individualized protocol based on ovarian reserve is designed to optimize the pregnancy outcome without compromising the patient safety. Although authors have shown that anti-Mullerian hormone-tailored (AMH) protocols have reduced the treatment burden and improved pregnancy rates, a few others have questioned its efficacy.

Aims:

The aim of this study was to decide whether the AMH-tailored protocol or the conventional protocol better decides IVF outcomes.

Setting and Design:

Prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary level university hospital.

Materials and Methods:

Patients undergoing theirfirst IVF cycle who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited and randomized to each group. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone was done for the patients on day 2 or 3 of a prior menstrual cycle, and serum AMH was done in the preceding cycle.

Statistical Analysis:

Analysis was performed using SPSS software version 16.

Results and Conclusion:

There were 100 patients in each group. A total of 83 patients underwent embryo transfer in the conventional group and 78 patients in the AMH group. The clinical pregnancy rates per initiated cycle (36.4% vs. 33.3%) and per embryo transfer (45.1% vs. 41.3%) were similar in both the groups. There was no statistical difference in the number of cycles cancelled due to poor response or the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in both the groups. Hence, this study showed the similar effectiveness of AMH-tailored protocol and conventional protocol in women undergoing IVF.

Functionality of a novel follitropin alfa pen injector: results from human factor interactions by patients and nurses

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this user experience testing study was to evaluate the impact of human factors on the use of a disposable pen containing follitropin alfa by patients and nurses with special focus on the convenience, safety and ease of use, in different types of stimulation protocols.

METHODS

Infertile women trying to conceive, and specialist nurses were recruited across 6 European countries. In total 18 patients and 19 nurses took part in the testing, which included both nurse-patient pairings and in-depth interviews. A standardized list of expected and pre-defined critical steps according to the Instructions for Use (IFU), was used to assess the correct handling of the pen.

RESULTS

During the user experience testing, no critical errors, related to the use of the pen, which could affect the success of the injection process were identified. In general, both nurses and patients found the pen very easy to learn, use and would be confident using the pen for self-injection. Nurses also found the pen very easy to train the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides valuable information on the pen from both patient and nurse perspectives in different simulated scenarios reflecting standard practice.

The likelihood of achieving pregnancy through timed coitus in young infertile women with decreased ovarian reserve

Objective

To evaluate the pregnancy rate and time to pregnancy after timed coitus with or without superovulation in infertile young women younger than 35 years old with low serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels (<25th percentile).

Methods

A total of 202 patients younger than 35 years old were recruited retrospectively between 2010 and 2012. Ninety-eight women had normal serum AMH levels (25-75th percentile), 75 women had low serum AMH levels (5th≤&<25th percentile) and 29 women had very low serum AMH levels (<5th percentile), according to reference values for their age group.

Results

The clinical pregnancy rate was positively associated with AMH levels, but this trend did not reach statistical significance (43.9% vs. 41.3% vs. 27.6% in the normal, low, and very low AMH groups, respectively). The time to pregnancy was longer in the very low AMH group than in the normal AMH group (13.1±10.9 months vs. 6.9±6.1 months, p=0.030). The cumulative live birth rate over 18 months was lower in the very low AMH group than in the normal AMH group, with marginal significance (20.0% vs. 55.9%, p=0.051). The duration of infertility was negatively correlated with achieving pregnancy (odds ratio, 0.953; 95% confidence interval, 0.914-0.994; p=0.026).

Conclusion

Conservative management, such as timed coitus with or without superovulation, should be considered in young patients who have low ovarian reserve without any infertility factors. However, for women with a long duration of infertility or very low serum AMH levels, active infertility treatment should be considered.

Pharmacogenomics in IVF: A New Era in the Concept of Personalized Medicine

Pharmacogenomics is a promising approach in the field of individualized medicine in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment that aims to develop optimized pharmacotherapy depending on the genetic background of each infertile woman, thus to ensure maximum effectiveness of the medication used, with minimal side effects. The unique genetic information of each infertile woman, in combination with already known, as well as new predictors of ovarian response and the progress of pharmacoepigenomics, is anticipated to greatly benefit the process of controlled ovarian stimulation. This review analyses current data on IVF pharmacogenomics, a new approach that is gradually moving to the frontline of modern IVF treatment.

Undetectable Serum Levels of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Women with Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome During In Vitro Fertilization and Successful Pregnancy Outcome: Case Report

SUMMARY – We report a unique case of undetectable serum levels of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF). A case is described of a 28-year-old woman with clinical symptoms of PCOS and AMH serum level below analytical sensitivity (<1.0 pmol/L). After undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation, the patient developed OHSS. After follicle aspiration, seven oocytes were recovered. Three of them were used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and fertilized, but with unsuccessful pregnancy outcome. A successful pregnancy was achieved in the second IVF/ICSI cycle with six oocytes retrieved and three embryos transferred. At 39 weeks of gestation, the patient delivered a healthy baby weighing 3930 g and 50 cm long. In conclusion, although AMH is considered a useful tool in ovarian reserve assessment and in predicting response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, the case presented shows that AMH should not be used as an independent ovarian marker.

Relationship between serum anti-Mullerian hormone and intrafollicular AMH levels in PCOS women

Polycystic ovary syndrome is a complex disease characterized by various endocrine disorders that are the potential cause of anovulation and hyperandrogenism. Anti-Müllerian hormone expression is suspected to be overexpressed in PCOS granulosa cells. AMH acts as a regulator of folliculogenesis: it is produced by the granulosa cells of follicles from the stage of the primary follicle to the initial formation of the antrum. Serum and intrafollicular AMH levels are elevated in patients with PCOS due to increased number of small follicles and an increased secretion within each of these small follicles. This excess of AMH is strongly suspected to play a role in the characteristic follicular arrest of PCOS, through a negative action on aromatase expression and on FSH action. Value above 5 ng/ml or 35 pmol/l might be considered as a diagnostic criterion for PCOS. The aim of our study is to demonstrate the presence of higher AMH serum levels and higher AMH intrafollicular fluid level of PCOS patients, undergone to IVF cycles, compared to normovulatory patients. The results clearly indicate that blood and intrafollicular AMH levels are significantly higher in PCOS women comparing to the normovulatory population. Serum AMH level appears to be a good predictive marker for the risk ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: thus, its evaluation should be recommended before starting a controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF.

The Impact of the Biological Variability or Assay Performance on AMH Measurements: A Prospective Cohort Study With AMH Tested on Three Analytical Assay-Platforms

This study examined longitudinal, age-related and intra-individual variation in Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) in regular menstruating women and correlated the hormonal levels to the antral follicle count (AFC). The impact of variations on an algorithm for calculation of follitropin-dose for ovarian stimulation were also tested. The study was carried out at a fertility clinic of a tertiary university hospital and had a prospective trial design. Twenty-six healthy women not receiving infertility treatment aged 22 to 50 years participated. Blood sampling for hormonal analysis was done every fifth day throughout three consecutive menstrual cycles, AFC was determined with 3-dimentional ultrasound and AMH measured by different assays from Beckman Coulter, Roche and Ansh Labs. Outcome measures were maximum and minimum difference in absolute and relative terms for each study subject during the test-period, coefficient of variation (Cv) for AMH for each cycle and cycle-day and correlation between AMH and AFC. The impact from variable AMH levels on an algorithm calculating follitrophin-delta dose in ovarian stimulation was explored. A significant longitudinal age-independent variation in AMH-levels and coefficient of variation in cycles and cycle days was found. A strong correlation between AMH-levels and AFC was confirmed and a case of significant divergence between assays was seen. Variations in AMH had a significant impact on an algorithm calculated dosage of gonadotrophins in ovarian stimulation. The finding of a substantial longitudinal variation in AMH question one recording being sufficient in quantifying gonadotrophins for ovarian stimulation, decision making and prognostication related to infertility treatment and counseling. Occasionally, commercial assays may fail to recognize specific AMH cleavage-products.

The correlation between AMH assays differs depending on actual AMH levels

STUDY QUESTION

What is the correlation of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels between two frequently used laboratory assays?

SUMMARY ANSWER

A considerable difference was found in serum AMH levels measured with the two different assays, particularly for low AMH values.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

AMH is regarded as being a robust, highly sensitive and specific biomarker for ovarian response and has become widely used as the basis for fertility treatment decisions. However, several available assays with different reference values, in addition to inter-laboratory variations and issues of sample stability, make interpretation of the AMH values and their clinical implications complicated.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

An observational study was performed including 269 serum samples from infertile women, originating from a RCT conducted in 2013-2016 (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT02013973).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHOD

Serum AMH levels analysed with the Modified Beckman Coulter Gen II ELISA assay (Premix method) were compared to AMH levels analysed with the Beckman Coulter Gen II ELISA original assay (Gen II original). All samples were handled identically and analysed with the two assays in a parallel setting.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The slope of the regression line showed a mean of 18% higher values with the Premix method compared to the Gen II original assay, and more than 40% higher values for AMH levels in the lower range.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The Gen II original assay is no longer in clinical use as it has been replaced by the Premix method, which, in turn, recently has been further developed into an automated method.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The finding of differences in AMH levels between assays is clinically important and may imply an incorrect classification in the assessment of ovarian reserve. The robustness of serum AMH as a marker for ovarian reserve and as a tool for fertility counselling has to be investigated further. There is an urgent need for international standards on interpretation of AMH values for different assays.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

Financial support was received through Sahlgrenska University Hospital (ALFGBG-70940) and the Hjalmar Svensson Research Foundation. None of the authors declares any conflict of interest.

How much variation in oocyte yield after controlled ovarian stimulation can be explained? A multilevel modelling study

STUDY QUESTION

How much variation in oocyte yield after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) can be accounted for by known patient and treatment characteristics?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There is substantial variation in the COS responses of similar women and in repeated COS episodes undertaken by the same woman, which cannot be accounted for at present.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN

The goal of individualized COS is to safely collect enough oocytes to maximize the chance of success in an ART cycle. Personalization of treatment rests on the ability to reduce variation in response through modifiable factors.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Multilevel modelling of a routine ART database covering the period 1 October 2008–8 August 2012 was employed to estimate the amount of variation in COS response and the extent to which this could be explained by immutable patient characteristics and by manipulable treatment variables. A total of 1851 treatment cycles undertaken by 1430 patients were included. The study was not subject to attrition, as cancelled cycles were included in the analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Women aged 21–43 years undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF (possibly with ICSI) using their own eggs at a tertiary care centre.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Substantial unexplained variation in COS response (oocyte yield): was observed (3.4-fold (95% CI: 3.12 to 3.61)). Only a relatively small amount of this variation (around 19%) can be explained by modifiable factors. A significant, previously undescribed predictor of response was the practitioner performing oocyte retrieval, with 1.5-fold variation between surgeons with the highest and lowest yields.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Although a large number of covariables were adjusted for in the analysis, including those that were used for dosing and determination of the stimulation regimen, this study is subject to confounding due to unmeasured variables and measurement error.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The present study suggests that there are limits to the extent that COS response can be predicted on the basis of known factors, or controlled by manipulation of treatment factors. Moreover, modifiable variation in response appears to be partially attributable to differences between surgeons performing oocyte retrieval. Consequently, consistent prevention of ineffective or unsafe responses to COS is not likely to be possible at present. Our results highlight the importance of blinding surgeons in RCTs. The data also suggest that there is likely to be limited scope for personalized treatment unless additional predictors of ovarian response can be identified.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

J.W. is funded by a Doctoral Research Fellowship from the National Institute for Health Research (DRF-2014-07-050) supervised by S.A.R. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health. J.W. is a statistical editor of the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group. S.A.R. is a statistical editor for Human Reproduction. J.W. also declares that publishing peer-reviewed articles benefits his career. A.L.M. has received consultation fees from MSD, Merck Serono, Ferring, TEVA, Roche, Beckman Coulter.