Adenomyosis: the missed disease

Adenomyosis, a menstruation-related uterine disorder, refers to the presence of endometrial stroma and glands within the myometrium and is typically observed in reproductive-age women. The pathogenesis explaining the migration, persistence, proliferation and differentiation of ectopic endometrial cells includes a genetic and epigenetic background, an oestrogen/progesterone receptor imbalance and an inflammatory reaction driven by local immune dysfunction, along with fibrosis and neuroangiogenesis within the myometrium. In the past, it was thought that adenomyosis almost exclusively affected multiparous women after 40 years of age and the diagnosis was generally confirmed upon hysterectomy. Nowadays, using imaging techniques such as transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, adenomyosis is increasingly identified in young women with dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, abnormal uterine bleeding and heavy menstrual bleeding, and also in infertile patients. Furthermore, adenomyosis often coexists with other gynaecological conditions, such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids. Despite the improvement of non-invasive diagnostic tools, the awareness of the condition is still poor and the diagnosis is often missed, due also to a heterogeneity in clinical presentation and imaging criteria. In addition, medical and surgical management do not follow shared recommendations, even though adenomyosis requires a lifelong management plan, including pain and bleeding control, fertility preservation and pregnancy complications.

The First Lugano Workshop on the role of adenomyosis in ART

Adenomyosis is an important clinical condition with uncertain prevalence, and clinical focus on adenomyosis in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased during recent years. Recognizing the limited clinical knowledge on the impact of adenomyosis on ART outcomes, the First Lugano Adenomyosis Workshop was a symposium involving experts in the field of adenomyosis, covering basic research, imaging, surgery and infertility to highlight current advances and future research areas over a wide range of topics related to adenomyosis. Adenomyosis is characterized by altered oestrogen and progesterone signalling pathways. Although the criteria of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) Consortium apply to patients with infertility, the presence of direct signs and localization in the different myometrial layers, particularly the inner myometrium, need more focus. In addition to the MUSA criteria, clinical symptoms and the magnitude of uterine enlargement should also be considered. Whilst pre-treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist with or without an aromatase inhibitor in frozen embryo transfer cycles seems promising, many issues related to therapy remain unanswered. During the Workshop, therapeutic progress over the past decades as well as novel insights were presented and discussed. The role of this opinion paper is to stimulate discussion and spark further interest in adenomyosis and the role of adenomyosis in infertility.

Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Women Treated for Bowel Endometriosis: A Seven-Year Single-Centre Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: Deep infiltrating endometriosis has been linked to worsened maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, reports regarding bowel endometriosis are still scanty. We aimed to evaluate pregnancy, delivery, and newborn adverse outcomes in women after laparoscopic-assisted surgery for bowel endometriosis. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary-care university hospital. From January 2015 to December 2021, pregnant women who were diagnosed and treated for bowel endometriosis were matched using a 1:3 ratio with pregnant women with no history of endometriosis. Patients were matched using the Cox proportional hazards model to determine parity, age, BMI and gestational age-adjusted relative risk (aRR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Co-primary outcomes were the incidence of labor abnormalities and cesarean section (CS) rate. Co-secondary outcomes were incidence of complications related to pregnancy, delivery, and newborn. Results: A total of 71 pregnancies among women treated for bowel endometriosis and 213 from healthy controls were included. Patients requiring IVF/ET for getting pregnant were in the bowel endometriosis group relative to controls (43.7% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.001). Increased risk of labor abnormalities was present for bowel endometriosis relative to controls (21.1% vs. 17.4%; p = 0.040; aRR 1.39 [95% CI 1.06-2.05]). Risk of non-cephalic fetal presentation (14.1% vs. 6.1%; p = 0.016; aRR 3.08 [95% CI 2.03-4.68]), CS rate (43.7% vs. 24.9%; p = 0.003; aRR 1.75 [95% CI 1.23-2.49]), and emergent CS rate (19.7% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.009; aRR 2.21 [95% CI 1.55-3.16]) were significantly higher in women treated for colorectal endometriosis compared with controls. Moreover, placenta previa (9.9% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001; aRR 21.82 [95% CI 2.19-116.40]), second-trimester hemorrhage (5.6% vs. 0.9%; p = 0.017; aRR 6.00 [95% CI 1.12-32.06]), postpartum hemorrhage (15.5% vs. 3.3%; p < 0.001; aRR 4.71 [95% CI 1.90-11.70]), and the need for transfusion during labor (5.6% vs. 0.5%; p = 0.004; aRR 12.00 [95% CI 1.36-105.60]) were increased in treatments vs. controls. Concerning neonatal outcomes, an increased risk for neonatal intensive care unit admission was seen in postsurgical endometriotic women relative to healthy controls (26.0% vs. 6.9%; p < 0.001; aRR 3.75 [2.04-3.86]). Conclusions: Women treated for bowel endometriosis seem more exposed to adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes relative to healthy controls. However, additional prospective and comparative studies are needed to validate the available evidence.

Adenomyosis and fertility-sparing surgery: A literature appraisal

Adenomyosis is an intricate pathological condition that negatively impacts the uterus. It is closely related to the more well-known endometriosis, with which it shares parallels in terms of diagnosis, therapy, and both microscopic and macroscopic features. The purpose of this narrative review is to give a clear univocal definition and outlook on the different, patient-adapted, surgical treatments. MEDLINE and PubMed searches on these topics were conducted from 1990 to 2022 using a mix of selected keywords. Papers and articles were identified and included in this narrative review after authors' revision and evaluation. From the literature analysis, authors reported the following surgical techniques: laparoscopic double/triple-flap method, laparotomic wedge resection of the uterine wall, laparotomic transverse H-incision of the uterine wall, laparotomic wedge-shaped excision, and laparotomic complete debulking excision by asymmetric dissection technique. Each of these techniques has strengths and weaknesses, but the literature data on the pregnancy rate are somewhat limited. The only certain information is the risk of uterine rupture up to 6.0% after surgical treatment for uterine adenomyosis. Over the years, the surgical approach continued to reach a positive result by minimally invasive treatment, with less hospitalization, less postoperative pain, and less blood loss. Over the years, the gynecological surgeon has gained the skills, training and increasingly sophisticated surgical techniques to target effective therapy. That's why a hysterectomy is no longer the only surgical resource to treat adenomyosis, but in patients who wish to preserve the fertility, there is a wide variety of surgical alternatives.

Does surgery for colorectal endometriosis prior to IVF±ICSI have an impact on cumulative live birth rates?

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does colorectal endometriosis surgery prior to IVF ± intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) impact cumulative live birth rates?

DESIGN

This retrospective, monocentric study (Lille University Hospital) was conducted between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2018. Two groups of patients from the JFIV database were included: a group undergoing IVF±ICSI alone (120 patients, 215 oocyte retrievals), and a group undergoing surgery and then IVF±ICSI (69 patients, 109 oocyte retrievals). The mode of management was decided after a multidisciplinary team meeting. Different criteria such as age (cut-off 35 years), anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (cut off 2 ng/ml), imaging results and the patient's symptomatology were considered: the most symptomatic patients underwent surgery prior to IVF±ICSI. The cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates obtained after four IVF attempts were estimated and compared between the two groups using competing risk survival methods.

RESULTS

The cumulative live birth rates after four IVF attempts in the two groups were not statistically significantly different (50.8% in the IVF±ICSI group versus 52.2% in the surgery followed by IVF±ICSI group, P = 0.43). The results for the cumulative clinical pregnancy rates were the same (56.7% in the IVF±ICSI group versus 58% in the surgery followed by IVF±ICSI group, P = 0.47).

CONCLUSION

The study shows that cumulative live birth and pregnancy rates were similar in infertile patients with colorectal endometriosis who underwent IVF±ICSI either with or without prior colorectal endometriosis surgery.

Different subtypes of ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Adenomyosis prevalence among women with infertility is increasing; their management during in vitro fertilization is usually based on ultrasound diagnosis alone. Herein, we summarize the latest evidence on the impact of ultrasound-diagnosed adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022355584). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 31, 2023, for cohort studies on the impact of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization outcomes. Fertility outcomes were compared according to the presence of adenomyosis as diagnosed by ultrasound, concurrent endometriosis and adenomyosis, and MRI-based or MRI- and ultrasound-based adenomyosis diagnosis. Live birth rate was the primary outcome while clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Women diagnosed with adenomyosis by ultrasound had lower live birth (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.82, grade: very low), lower clinical pregnancy (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.53-0.77, grade: very low), and higher miscarriage (OR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.35-2.44, grade: very low) rates than those without adenomyosis. Notably, symptomatic and diffuse, but not asymptomatic adenomyosis as diagnosed by ultrasound, adversely affected in vitro fertilization outcomes, with lower live birth (OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.34-0.96, grade: very low), clinical pregnancy (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.85, grade: low), and miscarriage (OR = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.28-4.82, grade: low) rates; and lower live birth (OR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.23-0.59, grade: low) and clinical pregnancy (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.34-0.75, grade: low), but not miscarriage rate (OR = 2.18; 95% CI: 0.72-6.62, grade: very low), respectively. Concurrent adenomyosis in endometriosis is associated with a significantly lower live birth rate (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.75, grade: low) than endometriosis alone. Finally, the use of MRI-based or MRI- and ultrasound-based adenomyosis diagnosis showed no significant association with in vitro fertilization outcomes (grade: very low for all outcomes).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering ultrasound findings, symptoms, and different subtypes of adenomyosis may aid in offering personalized counseling, improving treatment decisions, and achieving better outcomes of in vitro fertilization.

Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer

Although numerous studies have attempted to establish the relationship between adenomyosis and infertility, no consensus has emerged. Our aim was to investigate whether adenomyosis and endometriosis affected IVF outcomes in our patients. This was a retrospective study of 1720 patients from January 2016 to December 2019. In total, 1389 cycles were included: 229 cycles in the endometriosis group (group E), 89 cycles in the adenomyosis group (group A), 69 cycles in the endometriosis and adenomyosis group (group EA), and 1002 cycles in the control group (group C). Most patients in groups A and EA received GnRH agonist treatment before FET. The 1st FET live birth rates (LBR) were 39.3%, 32.1%, 25% and 48.1% in groups E, A, EA, and C. The miscarriage rates were 19.9%, 34.7%, 39%, and 17.6%. The per retrieval cycle cumulative live birth rates (cLBRs) in patients < 38 y/o were 56.4%, 58.1%, 44.8%, and 63%. The per retrieval cycle cLBRs in patients ≥ 38 y/o were 25%, 9.8%, 17.2%, and 29.5%. Among groups A and EA, LBRs were 25.58% and 18.89% in patients with a ≥ sevenfold decrease and a < sevenfold decrease in CA-125 level, respectively, after GnRH agonist treatment. Endometriosis was not associated with a poorer pregnancy outcome. Patients with adenomyosis with/without endometriosis had higher miscarriage rates, lower LBRs, and lower cLBRs, especially in patients aged ≥ 38 years, even after GnRH agonist treatment before FET cycles. Patients who have a greater than sevenfold decrease in CA-125 level after GnRH agonist treatment might have better clinical pregnancy outcomes.

Pregnancy rate following endometriomas management by ablation using plasma energy, cystectomy and drainage: A three-arm comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To compare differences in the postoperative pregnancy rate in women seeking to conceive and presenting with endometriomas larger than 3 cm in diameter, which were managed by ablation using plasma energy, cystectomy, or simple drainage.

METHODS

A retrospective three-arm comparative study based on prospective collection of data evaluating 363 patients, undergoing endometrioma cystectomy, ablation using plasma energy, or simple drainage.

RESULTS

In this series, 204 (56.2%) patients underwent endometrioma ablation using plasma energy, 121 (33.3%) received cystectomy, and 38 (10.5%) had a simple drainage. Postoperative follow up was 50 ± 26 months. Overall postoperative pregnancy rate was 60.3%. The probability of being pregnant after cystectomy, ablation, and drainage was respectively 27%, 32%, and 16% at 12 months, with a statistically significant difference between pregnancy rates among the three arms (P = 0.015). Simple drainage was associated with a probability of conception over 50% after 2 years, mainly based on postoperative assisted reproductive technology.

CONCLUSIONS

We reveal good postoperative pregnancy rate after ablation using plasma energy or cystectomy for endometriomas. Surgical management should be carefully considered in women with endometriomas and pregnancy intention, because the postoperative pregnancy rate may be compared with that observed after first-line assisted reproductive technology management.

The effect of adenomyosis types on clinical outcomes of IVF embryo transfer after ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the effect of adenomyosis types on IVF and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) after ultra-long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol?

DESIGN

Patients who underwent the first cycle of IVF-ET with ultra-long GnRH agonist protocol were included in this retrospective cohort study. They were divided into three groups: (A) 428 patients with diffuse adenomyosis; (B) 718 patients with focal adenomyosis; and (C) 519 patients with tubal infertility. Reproduction outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis revealed that, compared with focal adenomyosis and tubal infertility, diffuse adenomyosis was negatively associated with clinical pregnancy and live birth (clinical pregnancy: A versus B: OR 0.708, 95% CI 0.539 to 0.931, P = 0.013; A versus C: OR 0.663, 95% CI 0.489 to 0.899, P = 0.008; live birth: A versus B: OR 0.530, 95% CI 0.385 to 0.730, P < 0.001; A versus C: OR 0.441, 95% CI 0.313 to 0.623, P < 0.001), but positively associated with miscarriage (A versus B: OR 1.727, 95% CI 1.056 to 2.825, P = 0.029; A versus C: OR 2.549, 95% CI 1.278 to 5.082, P = 0.008). Compared with patients with tubal infertility, focal adenomyosis was also a risk factor for miscarriage (B versus C: OR 1.825, 95% CI 1.112 to 2.995, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with patients with focal adenomyosis or tubal infertility, the reproduction outcomes of IVF-ET in patients with diffuse adenomyosis seems to be worse.

First-line surgery vs first-line ART to manage infertility in women with deep endometriosis without bowel involvement: A multi-centric propensity-score matching comparison

OBJECTIVE

To compare first-line surgery with first-line assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in infertile women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) without colorectal involvement.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative cohort study with a propensity-score matching analysis, in four tertiary-care referral centers. The population was infertile women with DIE without colorectal involvement. The patients were managed either by first-line surgery followed by spontaneous conception attempts and/or ART, or by first-line ART. 284 patients were extracted from the databases. After matching, 92 patients were compared in each group. Clinical pregnancy rates (PR) and live-birth rates (LBR) were the primary outcomes, and cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) were the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean number of IVF-ICSI cycles per patient was 1.4, with a significant difference between the groups: 1.6 in the first-line ART group and 1.2 in the first-line surgery group (p = 0.006). The PR was significantly higher in the first-line surgery group (72 % vs 35 %; p < 0.001). In the first-line surgery group, non-ART pregnancies occurred in 18 % (17/92) while no non-ART pregnancies was noted in the first-line ART group. The LBR was significantly higher in the first-line surgery group (61 % vs 24 %; p < 0.001). After ART, the CPR were 72 % (47/67) in the first-line surgery group, and 35 % (32/92) in the first-line ART group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After matching, our results support that first-line surgery offer higher pregnancy and live-birth rates than first-line ART in patients with DIE without colorectal involvement.

Deep Endometriosis and Infertility: What Is the Impact of Surgery?

In women with deep endometriosis, the spontaneous fertility rate might range from 2 to 10%. The optimal management of these women is still an area of debate. Therefore, this review aims to explore the literature on the impact of deep endometriosis surgery on reproductive outcomes and pregnancy rates in women with and without prior infertility. A total of 392 articles were identified through database searching. Twenty-three studies were eligible to be included in the review. A total of 1548 women were identified, 814 of whom became pregnant, with a mean pregnancy rate of 52.6% (95% CI 49.7-63%). Our review suggests that surgery may improve fertility outcomes. Due to the variability in the studies, it is impossible to stratify fertility outcomes of surgery by the localization of deep endometriosis. More investigations are needed to determine whether surgical management should be first-intention or limited to the failure of medically assisted reproduction treatment.

The Effect of Uterine Adenomyosis on IVF Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To investigate the impact of uterine adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) clinical outcomes and also to evaluate the impact of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and surgical treatments. Infertile women with adenomyosis undergoing conventional IVF or ICSI were compared with women without adenomyosis. Fertility outcomes were evaluated in two patients with adenomyosis untreated and treated surgically or medically therapy. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020214586). We consider the live birth rate (LBR) as the primary outcome. The analysis showed that women with adenomyosis had lower LBR (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.92, p = 0.02), clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.90), and ongoing pregnancy rate (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.88) compared to those without adenomyosis, and miscarriage rate was higher in women with adenomyosis (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.33-3.33). Surgical treatment increases natural conception in women with adenomyosis although the paucity of data (only two studies), and conversely, treatment with GnRHa does not increase the IVF outcomes. Women with adenomyosis have decreased IVF clinical outcomes. Pretreatment with the use of long-term GnRHa could not be beneficial, even though only three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The major part of the studies has not divided focal and diffuse adenomyosis, and this represents a relevant source of bias: studies conducted with standardized diagnostic criteria for adenomyosis are still needed to determine if the different clinical presentations of such condition could compromise IVF outcomes.

Occurrence of chronic endometritis in different types of human adenomyosis

Purpose

Human adenomyosis has an adverse effect on female fertility. Exact mechanistic basis is still unclear. We investigated the occurrence of chronic endometritis (CE) in different types of human adenomyosis.

Methods

This is a prospective non-randomized observational study enrolling patients with focal (n = 30), diffuse (n = 26), intrinsic (n = 23), and extrinsic (n = 10) adenomyosis. Endometrial biopsy samples were collected from hysterectomy specimens. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed using antibody against CD68 (Mφ marker) with biopsy samples of intrinsic/extrinsic adenomyosis and CD138 (Syndecan-1), a marker of plasma cells, in all biopsy samples.

Results

In GnRHa-untreated groups, a higher trend in the occurrence of CE, as characterized by infiltration of ≥1 plasma cells in endometrial stroma, was found in women with focal (58.8%, p = 0.0849) and diffuse adenomyosis (60.0%, p = 0.0841) comparing to control women (10.0%). In women with focal adenomyosis, ipsilateral side showed a significantly higher occurrence of CE (58.8%) than on the contralateral side (11.7%) (p = 0.043). Tissue infiltration of macrophages in endometria was significantly higher in intrinsic than in extrinsic adenomyosis (p = 0.03) without showing any significant difference in the occurrence of CE between these two variants of adenomyosis.

Conclusion

A variable occurrence of CE in different types of adenomyosis may be involved in adverse reproductive outcome.

Effects of localisation of uterine adenomyosis on outcome of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Uterine adenomyosis is a benign disease, common among women in their 40 and 50 s, characterised by ectopic endometrial tissue in the uterine myometrial layer. Adenomyosis causes infertility and has a negative effect on the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) embryo transfer (ET) cycles. It has also been reported to have different characteristics depending on the adenomyotic lesion localisation. The effect of its localisation on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether adenomyotic lesion localisation, assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), was associated with outcomes of IVF/ICSI-ET cycles.

METHODS

This multicentre, joint, retrospective cohort study analysed the medical records of 67 infertile patients with adenomyosis who underwent IVF/ICSI with fresh and frozen-thawed ET at five participating facilities from January 2012 to December 2016 and for whom MRI data were available. Fifteen patients were excluded; therefore, the MRI data of 52 patients were evaluated by two radiologists. We assessed the localisation of and classified adenomyotic lesions into advanced (invades the full thickness of the uterine myometrium), extrinsic (localised on the serosal side), and intrinsic (localised on the endometrial side) subtypes.

RESULTS

There were 40 advanced, nine extrinsic, and three intrinsic cases, and the outcomes of 100, 27, and nine ET cycles, respectively, were analysed. Pregnancy loss/clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of the advanced, extrinsic, and intrinsic groups were 64 % (16/25) and 9 % (9/100), 33.3 % (3/9) and 22.2 % (6/27), and 50 % (1/2) and 11.1 % (1/9), respectively. A logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, prior miscarriage, and body mass index showed that the extrinsic group had fewer pregnancy losses (odds ratio 0.06; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.00-0.54, p = 0.026) and more live births (odds ratio 6.05; 95 % CI: 1.41-29.65, p = 0.018) than the advanced group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adenomyotic lesions exert different effects on IVF/ICSI-ET outcomes. Thus, MRI assessments of adenomyosis in infertile patients are beneficial. Establishment of treatment plans based on adenomyotic lesion localisation should be considered.

An axonemal alteration in apical endometria of human adenomyosis

STUDY QUESTION

Is there any change in the distribution of microvilli and microtubules in the apical endometria of women with adenomyosis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

We observed microvilli damage in the apical endometria and an axonemal alteration characterized by abnormal distribution of longitudinal bundles of microtubules within microvilli in women with adenomyosis.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Human adenomyosis has a negative impact on female fertility. Abnormal utero-tubal sperm transport, tissue inflammation and toxic effect of chemical mediators have been proposed as contributing factors. Inflammation-induced damage of mucosal cilia in the Fallopian tube has been reported. However, information on inflammation-induced damage of microvilli on the apical endometrial cells and its core bundles of microtubules in adenomyosis remains unknown.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a prospective cohort study with subjects undergoing laparoscopic surgery or hysterectomy for clinical indication and evaluations of endometrial biopsy samples in two academic university hospitals. During the period between March 2015 and December 2018, endometrial biopsy samples were prospectively collected from 15 control women and 45 women with adenomyosis for immunohistochemical analysis and a separate cohort of 10 control women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Grade 3 (CIN3) and 20 women with adenomyosis for analysis by immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

For immunohistochemical study, endometrial biopsy samples were prospectively collected from 15 control women with fibroids, 25 women with focal adenomyosis and 20 women with diffuse adenomyosis after surgery. The diagnosis of fibroid and adenomyosis was made clinically by transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging and confirmed by histology. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed retrospectively using antibody against CD68 (marker of macrophages) in endometrial biopsy specimens of women with and without adenomyosis. TEM was performed with the apical endometria collected from a separate cohort of 10 control women with CIN3 and 20 women with focal and diffuse adenomyosis for the identification of any change in the distribution of microvilli and longitudinal bundles of microtubules within microvilli.

MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE

Comparing to control endometria and contralateral side, tissue infiltration of macrophages (Mφ) in the endometria was significantly higher on the ipsilateral side of focal adenomyosis (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively) and anterior/posterior walls of diffuse adenomyosis (P = 0.01 for both). In a subgroup analysis of patients with focal adenomyosis with and without symptoms, the endometria of symptomatic women displayed a tendency of higher Mφ infiltration on the ipsilateral side than in asymptomatic women (P = 0.07). Comparing to contralateral side endometria of symptomatic women, Mφ infiltration was significantly higher in the endometria of symptomatic women collected from the ipsilateral side of focal adenomyosis (P = 0.03). We found a significantly less tissue infiltration of Mφ in the endometria of women with CIN3 than that in endometria of women with focal adenomyosis. TEM analysis showed that number of microvilli in the endometria was significantly decreased on the ipsilateral side (P = 0.003) comparing to that on the contralateral side of focal adenomyosis. The Chi-squared test indicated that cases with abnormal (disruption in the normal arrangement of 9 peripheral pairs + 1 central pair) microtubules (MT) were significantly higher in women with adenomyosis than in cases with normal patterns (P = 0.0016). While contralateral side displayed significantly less abnormal MT (P = 0.0002), ipsilateral side of focal adenomyosis showed significantly higher abnormal MT (P = 0.0164) comparing to normal patterns. Cases with symptomatic adenomyosis showed significantly higher abnormal MT than normal MT (P = 0.0004). An axonemal alteration characterized by abnormal structural distribution of microtubules within microvilli in the apical endometria in response to endometrial inflammation may be involved in adverse reproductive outcome in women with adenomyosis.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The average age of women in this study was high that may be associated with overall decline in fertility regardless of the presence or absence of adenomyosis or endometriosis. We collected endometrial biopsy samples from two completely separate cohorts of women for analysis by immunohiostochemistry and TEM. We need future follow-up study with increased sample size and from the same patients to precisely clarify the mechanistic link between axonemal alteration and negative fertility outcome.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our current findings may have some biological implication to better understand the endometrial epithelial biology and pathology in women with adenomyosis and may open the avenue for future study in other reproductive diseases. The ultra-structural abnormalities of microvilli and microtubules in the apical endometria in response to tissue inflammatory reaction may clarify the possible association between negative fertility outcome and adenomyosis. Our findings may be clinically useful during counseling with symptomatic patients with adenomyosis desiring pregnancy.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST (S)

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture, Science and Technology of Japan. There is no conflict of interest related to this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Impact of Surgery for Deep Infiltrative Endometriosis before In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare reproductive outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for deep infiltrative endometriosis (DIE) before in vitro fertilization (IVF) with those in patients who underwent IVF without a previous surgery for DIE, to analyze data according to different types of surgery (complete or incomplete) or subgroups of patients (DIE with or without bowel involvement), and to assess surgical and IVF complications and data regarding safety concerns.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search from January 1980 to November 2019 with no language restriction was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The search strategy used the following Medical Subject Headings terms: "in vitro," "fertilization," "IVF," "assisted reproduction," "colorectal," "endometriosis," "deep," "infiltrating," "deep infiltrative endometriosis," "intestinal," "bowel," "rectovaginal," "uterosacral," "vaginal," and "bladder."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that compared reproductive outcomes in women with infertility with DIE who received IVF with or without a previous surgery for DIE lesions. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan v.5.3; Cochrane Training, London, United Kingdom). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The systematic search retrieved 150 articles; 98 studies were potentially eligible, and their full texts were reviewed. Of these, 12 studies met our inclusion criteria, and 5 presented data suitable for inclusion in a meta-analysis; however, 2 of the studies provided overlapping data, and only the larger study was finally included. No randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were found. The pregnancy rate per patient was 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-2.64), the pregnancy rate per cycle was 1.84 (95% CI, 1.26-2.70), and the live birth rate per patient was 2.22 (95% CI, 1.42-3.46) times more likely for operated patients than for nonoperated ones. The addition of data from the incomplete surgery groups also showed a higher pregnancy rate per patient for surgery before IVF (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; 95% CI, 1.16-2.28). The results favor previous surgery in DIE with digestive involvement (OR 2.43; 95% CI, 1.13-5.22) and also in DIE without digestive involvement (OR 1.55; 95% CI, 0.61-3.95). A qualitative analysis of the complications of surgery and IVF showed a partial or complete lack of information on these issues as well as high heterogeneity in the reported data. None of these studies is an RCT; therefore, all have a high risk of selection and allocation bias, except for 1 study that statistically controlled the latter risk by using propensity scores. Funnel plots showed no asymmetry.

CONCLUSION

The results were very consistent for all the studied outcomes, showing a statistically significant benefit for surgery before IVF, although they should be confirmed with RCTs. In addition to the reproductive outcomes, safety data should also be reported to obtain a complete assessment of the risks and benefits.

Fertility in patients with untreated rectosigmoid endometriosis

RESEARCH QUESTION

Several studies have investigated reproductive outcomes following surgical treatment of colorectal endometriosis, mainly segmental colorectal resection. This study examines pregnancy and live birth rates of women with rectosigmoid endometriosis not treated by surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of data collected between May 2009 and January 2020 related to 215 women affected by rectosigmoid endometriosis wishing to conceive. Patients had a diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging enema. Patients with estimated bowel stenosis >70% at computed tomographic colonography and/or subocclusive/occlusive symptoms were excluded.

RESULTS

During the median length of follow-up of 31 months (range 13-63 months), the total pregnancy and live birth rates of the study population were 47.9% and 45.1%, respectively. Sixty-two women had a live birth after natural conception (28.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.8-35.6%) with a median time required to conceive of 10 months (range 2-34 months). Eighty-three women underwent infertility treatments (38.6%, 95% CI 32.1-45.5%); among these, 68 patients underwent IVF either directly (n = 51) or after intrauterine insemination (IUI) failure (n = 17). Time to conception was significantly higher in women having conceived by IVF than in those having conceived naturally (P < 0.001) or by IUI (P = 0.006). In patients undergoing IVF cycles, a worsening of some pain and intestinal symptoms was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

At median follow-up of 31 months, women with rectosigmoid endometriosis have a 48% pregnancy rate. However, these patients must be referred to centres specialized in managing endometriosis to properly assess symptoms and degree of bowel stenosis.

Infertility in women with bowel endometriosis: first-line assisted reproductive technology results in satisfactory cumulative live-birth rates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the assisted reproductive technology (ART) cumulative live-birth rate (LBR) in a cohort of bowel endometriosis patients with no prior history of surgery for endometriosis.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred and one consecutive infertile bowel-endometriosis patients with no prior history of surgery for endometriosis in whom the diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria using transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

INTERVENTION(S)

First-line ART.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cumulative LBR, with statistical analysis via Kaplan Meier method with a "conservative" method, whereby it was assumed that no live births took place for patients who did not return.

RESULT(S)

Between January 2016 and December 2018, 101 bowel endometriosis patients underwent 176 ART cycles. The mean number of deep-infiltrating endometriosis lesions per patient was 3 ± 0.9, with a mean number of bowel lesions of 1.3 ± 0.6. Seventy-three percent of the patients had associated endometriomas, and 88.1% had associated adenomyosis. Overall, the cumulative LBR after four ART cycles was 64.4%, using the conservative Kaplan-Meier method.

CONCLUSION(S)

The ART cumulative LBR was very satisfactory (64.4%) in bowel endometriosis patients with no prior history of surgery for endometriosis. In light of these data, clinicians should carefully weigh the pros and cons before systematically referring infertile bowel endometriosis patients to fertility-preserving surgery because as first-line ART appears to offer satisfactory results.

Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach

BACKGROUND

Adenomyosis is a benign uterine disorder where endometrial glands and stroma are pathologically demonstrated within the uterine myometrium. The pathogenesis involves sex steroid hormone abnormalities, inflammation, fibrosis and neuroangiogenesis, even though the proposed mechanisms are not fully understood. For many years, adenomyosis has been considered a histopathological diagnosis made after hysterectomy, classically performed in perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) or pelvic pain. Until recently, adenomyosis was a clinically neglected condition. Nowadays, adenomyosis may also be diagnosed by non-invasive techniques, because of imaging advancements. Thus, a new epidemiological scenario has developed with an increasing number of women of reproductive age with ultrasound (US) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis of adenomyosis. This condition is associated with a wide variety of symptoms (pelvic pain, AUB and/or infertility), but it is also recognised that some women are asymptomatic. Furthermore, adenomyosis often coexists with other gynecological comorbidities, such as endometriosis and uterine fibroids, and the diagnostic criteria are still not universally agreed. Therefore, the diagnostic process for adenomyosis is challenging.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

We present a comprehensive review on the diagnostic criteria of adenomyosis, including clinical signs and symptoms, ultrasound and MRI features and histopathological aspects of adenomyotic lesions. We also briefly summarise the relevant theories on adenomyosis pathogenesis, in order to provide the pathophysiological background to understand the different phenotypes and clinical presentation. The review highlights the controversies of multiple existing criteria, summarising all of the available evidences on adenomyosis diagnosis. The review aims also to underline the future perspective for diagnosis, stressing the importance of an integrated clinical and imaging approach, in order to identify this gynecological disease, so often underdiagnosed.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for all original and review articles related to diagnosis of adenomyosis published in English until October 2018.

OUTCOMES

The challenge in diagnosing adenomyosis starts with the controversies in the available pathogenic theories. The difficulties in understanding the way the disease arises and progresses have an impact also on the specific diagnostic criteria to use for a correct identification. Currently, the diagnosis of adenomyosis may be performed by non-invasive methods and the clinical signs and symptoms, despite their heterogeneity and poor specificity, may guide the clinician for a suspicion of the disease. Imaging techniques, including 2D and 3D US as well as MRI, allow the proper identification of the different phenotypes of adenomyosis (diffuse and/or focal). From a histological point of view, if the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis is straightforward, in more limited disease, the diagnosis has poor inter-observer reproducibility, leading to extreme variations in the prevalence of disease. Therefore, an integrated non-invasive diagnostic approach, considering risk factors profile, clinical symptoms, clinical examination and imaging, is proposed to adequately identify and characterise adenomyosis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The development of the diagnostic tools allows the physicians to make an accurate diagnosis of adenomyosis by means of non-invasive techniques, representing a major breakthrough, in the light of the clinical consequences of this disease. Furthermore, this technological improvement will open a new epidemiological scenario, identifying different groups of women, with a dissimilar clinical and/or imaging phenotypes of adenomyosis, and this should be object of future research.

Fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients with adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to investigate the association of adenomyosis with fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. An electronic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases up to April 2020. Seventeen observational studies were included. Adenomyosis was significantly associated with a lower clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.94) and higher miscarriage rate (OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.25-3.79) after treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART). The lower clinical pregnancy rate was more significant in the subgroup of patients with short down-regulation protocols. Similar associations were recorded after age adjustment. Adenomyosis was also significantly associated with an increased risk of pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, Caesarean section, fetal malpresentation, small for gestational age infancy and post-partum haemorrhage, which was confirmed after correction for age and mode of conception. In conclusion, adenomyosis is associated with negative effects on fertility after ART. The potentially protective role of the ultra-long down-regulation protocols needs further evaluation in randomized controlled studies. Adenomyosis is also associated (independently of the mode of conception) with adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Proper counselling prior to ART and close monitoring of pregnancy in patients with adenomyosis should be recommended.

What women want: Fertility sparing surgery in Borderline ovarian tumours patients and pregnancy outcome

OBJECTIVE

Borderline ovarian tumours (BOTs) are characterized by the presence of cellular proliferation and nuclear atypia without stromal invasion. Compared to malignant ovarian tumours, BOTs have better prognoses. The most important treatment of BOT is surgery. Considering the good prognosis of BOT, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered for young women who desire to preserve fertility. Our study evaluated the pregnancy rate in patients with childbearing desire, the efficacy and risk of recurrence of women affected by BOTs who have undergone FSS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients characteristics have been restrospectively retrieved for diagnosis made from June 2000 to December 2017 from San Raffaele Hospital and Policlinico Cagliari. Patients underwent FSS for BOT were interviewed about child wishing and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

85 patients were recruited for the study. Median age at diagnosis was 33 years. Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was performed in 33 patients (38%), unilateral cystectomy in 40 (47%) and 12 underwent both procedures (14%). 40 women (50%) tried to conceive after surgery. The pregnancy rate was 73% and live birth rate was 67%. Childbearing desire and age at diagnosis were significantly associated with the pregnancy rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative surgical treatment seems to be a reasonable therapeutic option for women with BOTs who wish to preserve fertility. Our results suggest that the obstetric outcomes after FSS are promising. Maternal desire and the age of diagnosis are the most important factors affecting PR after surgery. Fertility counselling should be an integral part of the clinical management of women with BOT.

Bowel Endometriosis: Current Perspectives on Diagnosis and Treatment

Endometriosis is a chronic condition primarily affecting young women of reproductive age. Although some women with bowel endometriosis may be asymptomatic patients typically report a myriad of symptoms such as alteration in bowel habits (constipation/diarrhoea) dyschezia, dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia in addition to infertility. To date, there are no clear guidelines on the evaluation of patients with suspected bowel endometriosis. Several techniques have been proposed including transvaginal and/or transrectal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and double-contrast barium enema. These different imaging modalities provide greater information regarding presence, location and extent of endometriosis ensuring patients are adequately informed whilst also optimizing preoperative planning. In cases where surgical management is indicated, surgery should be performed by experienced surgeons, in centres with access to multidisciplinary care. Treatment should be tailored according to patient symptoms and wishes with a view to excising as much disease as possible, whilst at the same time preserving organ function. In this review article current perspectives on diagnosis and management of bowel endometriosis are discussed.

Exploring the challenges for a new classification of adenomyosis

The availability of non-invasive diagnostic tests is an important factor in the renewed interest in adenomyosis, as the disease can now be more accurately mapped in the uterus without a need for hysterectomy. An agreed system for classifying and reporting the condition will enhance our understanding of the disease and is envisaged to enable comparison of research studies and treatment outcomes. In this review, we assess previous and more recent attempts at producing a taxonomy, especially in view of the latest proposal for subdivision of adenomyosis into an internal and an external variant. In this context, we also explore the uncertainties linked to classifying involvement of the uterovesical pouch, the pouch of Douglas and lesions in the outer myometrium. Two opposing hypotheses are forwarded to explain the pathogenesis of these variants, namely that disease localized in these areas originates from an invasion by uterine adenomyosis of peritoneal organs; alternatively, that lesions present in the outer myometrium originate from peritoneal endometriosis. At the root of debates around these opposing theories of pathogenesis is fragmentary evidence. Because of the limitations of currently available evidence, and until this issue is resolved, broad agreement on a hypothesis to underpin any proposed classification is unlikely.

Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease defined as the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, which causes pelvic pain and infertility. This disease should be viewed as a public health problem with a major effect on the quality of life of women as well as being a substantial economic burden. In light of the considerable progress with diagnostic imaging (for example, transvaginal ultrasound and MRI), exploratory laparoscopy should no longer be used to diagnose endometriotic lesions. Instead, diagnosis of endometriosis should be based on a structured process involving the combination of patient interviews, clinical examination and imaging. Notably, a diagnosis of endometriosis often leads to immediate surgery. Therefore, rethinking the diagnosis and management of endometriosis is warranted. Instead of assessing endometriosis on the day of the diagnosis, gynaecologists should consider the patient's 'endometriosis life'. Medical treatment is the first-line therapeutic option for patients with pelvic pain and no desire for immediate pregnancy. In women with infertility, careful consideration should be made regarding whether to provide assisted reproductive technologies prior to performing endometriosis surgery. Modern endometriosis management should be individualized with a patient-centred, multi-modal and interdisciplinary integrated approach.

Pregnancy Rates After Surgical Treatment of Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis in Infertile Patients With at Least 2 Previous In Vitro Fertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Failures

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the postoperative probabilities of pregnancy in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and ≥2 previous in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) failures.

DESIGN

Retrospective study using data prospectively recorded in the North-West Inter Regional Female Cohort for Patients with Endometriosis (CIRENDO) database.

SETTING

University tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Infertile patients under the age of 43 years, having undergone ≥2 previous IVF or ICSI failures, who were surgically managed for DIE.

INTERVENTIONS

Complete excision of DIE.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The pregnancy rate after surgery was assessed. One hundred and four infertile patients had surgery in 7 different centers participating in the database. Seventy-seven women intended to get pregnant postoperatively. Four patients who got pregnant by oocyte donation were excluded, resulting in a sample of 73 women. The mean patient age was 31.9 years (standard deviation [SD], 4.1), and the mean length of history of infertility was 48.4 months (SD, 26.5). Stage III and IV endometriosis were recorded in 83.6% of patients. The mean postoperative follow-up was 46.6 months (SD, 20.5). The postoperative pregnancy rate was 43.8% with a mean time from surgery to pregnancy of 11.1 months. 21.8% of pregnancies were spontaneous, 31.2% were obtained by IVF, 21.8% by frozen embryo transfer, 18.7% by IVF-ICSI, and 3.1% by intrauterine insemination. Multivariate analysis revealed that ovarian surgery, age ≥35 years old, and stage II endometriosis was associated with the probability of conception.

CONCLUSION

Infertile women with ≥2 IVF-ICSI failures may be referred for surgery as it appears related to reasonable postoperative pregnancy rates, particularly when endometriomas surgery is either not required or not performed. Surgery for DIE does not routinely delay conception, as it usually occurs during the year following surgery.

Clinical Management of Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common and challenging condition of reproductive-aged women that carries a high individual and societal cost. The many molecular dissimilarities between endometriosis lesions and eutopic endometrium create difficulties in the development of new drug therapies and treatments. Surgery remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis, but it must be weighed against the risks of surgical morbidity and potential decreases in ovarian reserve, especially in the case of endometriomas. Safe and effective surgical techniques are discussed within this article for various presentations of endometriosis. Medical therapy is suppressive rather than curative, and regimens that are long-term and affordable with minimal side effects are recommended. Recurrences are common and often rapid when medical therapy is discontinued. Endometriosis in the setting of infertility is reviewed and appropriate management is discussed, including when and whether surgery is warranted in this at-risk population. In patients with chronic pain, central sensitization and myofascial pain are integral components of a multidisciplinary approach. Endometriosis is associated with an increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer; however, the risk is low and currently no preventive screening is recommended. Hormone therapy for symptomatic women with postsurgical menopause should not be delayed as a result of concerns for malignancy or recurrence of endometriosis.

High postoperative fertility rate following surgical management of colorectal endometriosis

STUDY QUESTION

What are fertility outcomes in patients surgically managed for large deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum who intend to get pregnant postoperatively?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Surgical management for rectal endometriosis is followed by high pregnancy rates, with a majority of natural conceptions.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Optimal management such as surgery versus first-line ART for patients with severe deep endometriosis who desire pregnancy is not defined.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

The study included the patients enrolled in ENDORE randomized trial who attempted pregnancy after the surgery. From March 2011 to August 2013, we performed a two-arm randomized trial, enrolling 60 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum up to 15 cm from the anus, measuring more than 20 mm in length, involving at least the muscular layer in depth, and up to 50% of rectal circumference. Postoperative follow-up was prolonged in 55 patients recruited at Rouen University Hospital, and varied from 50 to 79 months. No women were lost to follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients had either conservative surgery by shaving or disc excision, or radical rectal surgery by segmental resection. One gynecologist experienced in deep endometriosis surgery performed all the procedures, assisted when required by three general surgeons experienced in colorectal surgery. Institutional review board approval was obtained to extend postoperative follow-up to 10 years after the surgery. Among patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, women who intended to get pregnant after surgery were selected and followed up postoperatively every 6 months for 2 years, then every year. Pregnancy intention, fertility outcomes, conception mode, endometriosis recurrences and digestive and urinary outcomes were rigorously recorded. The primary outcome was postoperative pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were conception mode, the delay to conception from the day of surgery and the day when hormonal treatment was stopped, and delivery rate. Kaplan Meier curves were used to estimate the probability of conception after surgery.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Among the 55 patients enrolled at Rouen University Hospital, 25 had conservative and 30 had radical surgery, and their postoperative follow-up varied from 50 to 79 months. No patient was lost to follow-up. Among the 55 patients, 36 intended to get pregnant after surgery, 23 of whom had unsuccessfully attempted to conceive for more than 12 months before surgery (63%). At the end of follow-up, 29 patients achieved pregnancy (81%), and natural conception was recorded in 17 of them (59% of conceptions). As several women had more than 1 pregnancy (range: 0–3), we recorded 37 pregnancies, 24 natural conceptions (65%) and 29 deliveries (78%). The probabilities of achieving pregnancy at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months postoperatively were 33.4% (95% CI: 20.6–51.3%), 60.6% (44.8–76.8%), 77% (61.5–89.6%) and 86.8% (72.8–95.8%), respectively. Women who had been advised to attempt natural conception achieved pregnancy significantly earlier than patients referred for ART (P = 0.008). In infertile patients, the postoperative pregnancy rate was 74%, and 53% of conceptions were natural.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The main outcomes of the original trial were related to digestive function and not to fertility. Several factors impacting fertility could not be revealed due to small sample size. The study included a high percentage of young women with an overall satisfactory prognosis for fertility, as patients’ median age was 28 years. The inclusion of only large infiltrations of the rectum does not allow the extrapolation of conclusions to small nodules of <2 cm in length. Only one skilled gynecologic surgeon performed all the procedures.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

First-line surgery can be considered in patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum and pregnancy intention. Patients receiving advice from experienced surgeons on conception modes were more likely to conceive faster after surgery.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by a grant from the clinical research program for hospitals (PHRC) in France. The authors declare no competing interests related to this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The original randomized trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT 01291576).

Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles? A retrospective analysis of 973 patients

RESEARCH QUESTION

Reports on the effect of adenomyosis on assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes are conflicting. Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles in women pretreated with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist?

DESIGN

In this retrospective cohort study, 973 women were divided into four groups: only endometriosis (n = 355); endometriosis and adenomyosis (n = 88); adenomyosis alone (n = 64); and tubal factor infertility as controls (n = 466). The pregnancy outcome parameters (clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, live birth rate) were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy rate was 36.62% in women with endometriosis alone, 22.72% in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis, 23.44% in women who only had adenomyosis and 34.55% in controls. Miscarriage rates were as follows: 14.62%, 35%, 40% and 13.04%, respectively. Live birth rates were 27.47% in controls; 26.48% in women with only endometriosis; 11.36% in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis; and 12.5% in women with only adenomyosis. Live birth was observed to be less in adenomyosis groups compared with controls and women with only endometriosis. No significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy, miscarriage or live birth rate between controls and women with only endometriosis. Live birth rate was significantly different between controls and women with adenomyosis only (P = 0.01) and women with endometriosis and adenomyosis (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Presence of adenomyosis seems to have adverse effects on IVF outcomes in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and miscarriage rate. Screening for adenomyosis might be considered before ART so that the couple has better awareness of the prognosis.

Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis

Where histology used the presence of glands and/or stroma in the myometrium as pathognomonic for adenomyosis, imaging uses the appearance of the myometrium, the presence of striations, related to the presence of endometrial tissue within the myometrium, the presence of intramyometrial cystic structures and the size and asymmetry of the uterus to identify adenomyosis. Preliminary reports show a good correlation between the features detected by imaging and the histological findings. Symptoms associated with adenomyosis are abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain (dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia), and impaired reproduction. However a high incidence of existing comorbidity like fibroids and endometriosis makes it difficult to attribute a specific pathognomonic symptom to adenomyosis. Heterogeneity in the reported pregnancy rates after assisted reproduction is due to the use of different ovarian stimulation protocols and absence of a correct description of the adenomyotic pathology. Current efforts to classify the disease contributed a lot in elucidated the potential characteristics that a classification system should be relied on. The need for a comprehensive, user friendly, and clear categorization of adenomyosis including the pattern, location, histological variants, and the myometrial zone seems to be an urgent need. With the uterus as a possible unifying link between adenomyosis and endometriosis, exploration of the uterus should not only be restricted to the hysteroscopic exploration of the uterine cavity but in a fusion with ultrasound.

Endometriosis and in vitro fertilisation

The aim of the present review was to discuss a matter of concern in the clinical field of obstetrics/gynecology, namely the potency of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in the management of endometriosis-associated infertility. Endometriosis is a medical condition affecting one tenth of women in their fertile years, and accounts for up to 50% of infertile women. Thus, such high prevalence has established the necessity for investigating the effectiveness of available techniques in eradicating the disease and constraining infertility as well as the accompanying pain symptoms of endometriosis. The underlying mechanisms connecting endometriosis with low fecundity have been extensively studied, both in terms of genetic alterations and epigenetic events that contribute to the manifestation of an infertility phenotype in women with the disease. Several studies have dealt with the impact of IVF in pregnancy rates (PRs) on patients with endometriosis, particularly regarding women who wish to conceive. Results retrieved from studies and meta-analyses depict a diverse pattern of IVF success, underlining the involvement of individual parameters in the configuration of the final outcome. The ultimate decision on undergoing IVF treatment should be based on objective criteria and clinicians' experience, customized according to patients' individual needs.

[First line management without IVF of infertility related to endometriosis: Result of medical therapy? Results of ovarian superovulation? Results of intrauterine insemination? CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

INTRODUCTION

Using the structured methodology of French guidelines (HAS-CNGOF), the aim of this chapter was to formulate good practice points (GPP), in relation to optimal non-ART management of endometriosis related to infertility, based on the best available evidence in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This guideline was produced by a group of experts in the field including a thorough systematic search of the literature (from January 1980 to March 2017). Were included only women with endometriosis related to infertility. For each recommendation, a grade (A-D, where A is the highest quality) was assigned based on the strength of the supporting evidence.

RESULTS

Management of endometriosis related to infertility should be multidisciplinary and take account into the pain, the global evaluation of infertile couple and the different phenotypes of endometriotic lesions (good practice point). Hormonal treatment for suppression of ovarian function should not prescribe to improve fertility (grade A). After laproscopy for endometriosis related to infertility, the Endometriosis Fertility Index should be used to counsel patients regarding duration of conventional treatments before undergoing ART (grade C). After laparoscopy surgery for infertile women with AFS/ASRM stage I/II endometriosis or superficial peritoneal endometriosis, controlled ovarian stimulation with or without intrauterine insemination could be used to enhance non-ART pregnancy rate (grade C). Gonadotrophins should be the first line therapy for the stimulation (grade B). The number of cycles before referring ART should not exceed up to 6 cycles (good practice point). No recommendation can be performed for non-ART management of deep infiltrating endometriosis or endometrioma, as suitable evidence is lacking.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Non-ART management is a possible option for the management of endometriosis related to infertility. Endometriosis Fertilty Index could be a useful tool for subsequent postoperative fertility management. Controlled ovarian stimulation can be proposed.

[Deeply infiltrating endometriosis and infertility: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]

Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is a severe form of the disease, defined by endometriotic tissue peritoneal infiltration. The disease may involve the rectovaginal septum, uterosacral ligaments, digestive tract or bladder. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is responsible for disabling pain and infertility. The purpose of these recommendations is to answer the following question: in case of deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility, what is the best therapeutic strategy? First-line surgery and then in vitro fertilization (IVF) in case of persistent infertility or first-line IVF, without surgery? After exhaustive literature analysis, we suggest the following recommendations: studies focusing on spontaneous fertility of infertile patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis found spontaneous pregnancy rates about 10%. Treatment should be considered in infertile women with deeply infiltrating endometriosis when they wish to conceive. First-line IVF is a good option in case of no operated deeply infiltrating endometriosis associated infertility. Pregnancy rates (spontaneous and following assisted reproductive techniques) after surgery (deep lesions without colorectal involvement) varie from 40 to 85%. After colorectal endometriosis resection, pregnancy rates vary from 47 to 59%. The studies comparing the pregnancy rates after IVF, whether or not preceded by surgery, are contradictory and do not allow, to date, to conclude on the interest of any surgical management of deep lesions before IVF. In case of alteration of ovarian reserve parameters (age, AMH, antral follicle count), there is no argument to recommend first-line surgery or IVF. The study of the literature does not identify any prognostic factors, allowing to chose between surgical management or IVF. The use of IVF in the indication "deep infiltrating endometriosis" allows satisfactory pregnancy rates without significant risk, regarding disease progression or oocyte retrieval procedure morbidity.

Pelvic Pain and Quality of Life Before and After Laparoscopic Bowel Resection for Rectosigmoid Endometriosis: A Prospective, Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Surgery for rectosigmoid endometriosis carries a substantial risk of short- and long-term complications, which has to be counterbalanced against the potential effect of the procedure. Prospective data are scarce in the field of deep infiltrating endometriosis surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess pelvic pain and quality of life before and after laparoscopic bowel resection for rectosigmoid endometriosis.

DESIGN

The study involved prospectively collected data regarding pelvic pain and quality of life before and after surgery.

SETTINGS

It was conducted at a tertiary endometriosis referral unit at Aarhus University Hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 175 women were included.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent laparoscopic bowel resection for endometriosis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaires for pain (Numerical Rating Scale) and quality of life (RAND Short Form-36) were answered before and 1 year after surgery. Data on analgesic and hormone treatment were collected. Preoperative and postoperative pelvic pain and quality-of-life scores were compared, and risk factors for improvement/worsening were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 97.1% of the women completed the 1-year follow up. A significant decrease (p = 0.0001) was observed on all pelvic pain parameters. Most profound was the decrease in dyschezia. A significant improvement on all quality-of-life scores was observed (p = 0.0001). A surgical complication did not have a negative impact on outcome 1 year after surgery. The postoperative outcome was not related to the type of surgery.

LIMITATIONS

This is an observational study without a control group. Risk factor data should be interpreted with caution, because the study was relatively underpowered for some of the rare outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant and clinically relevant improvement in pelvic pain and quality of life 1 year after laparoscopic bowel resection for endometriosis was found. We strongly recommend surgery for rectosigmoid endometriosis that is unresponsive to conservative treatment. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A472.

Window of Implantation is Significantly Displaced in Patients with Adenomyosis with Previous Implantation Failure as Determined by Endometrial Receptivity Assay

Background:

Adenomyosis is associated with implantation failure and poor reproductive performance in IVF/ICSI cycles.

Aims:

To compare if window of implantation (WOI) is displaced in patients having adenomyosis compared to controls using endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test.

Settings and Design:

Retrospective Case control study. 374 patients with previous one or more IVF failures who underwent ERA test between 2013-2016 at our centre were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A-36 patients with adenomyosis (study group) and Group B- 338 patients without adenomyosis (controls).

Statistical Analysis:

Normality assumptions for continuous variables were tested using Kolmogorov Smirnov test. Mean values of two groups were compared using Student's t-independent test. Frequency data by categories were compared using Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. Risk ratio and 95% confidence limits were calculated. P < 0.05 was considered for statistical significance.

Results:

WOI was displaced (Non Receptive ERA) significantly in adenomyosis 47.2% (17/36) compared to controls 21.6% (73/338) (P < 0.001, CI-8.7%-42.5%) making risk ratio of displaced WOI in adenomyosis versus controls to be 2:1. The incidence of RIF was 66.6% in adenomyosis compared to 34.9% in controls (P < 0.001, CI- 15.5%-47.9%). Pregnancy rate after personalized embryo transfer in adenomyosis group was 62.5%, signifying displaced WOI as a cause of implantation failure in adenomyosis patients with previous implantation failure.

Conclusions:

Our study suggests it is prudent to evaluate Endometrial receptivity before embryo transfer in patients with adenomyosis to avoid wastage of good embryos.

[Bowel endometriosis and infertility: Do we need to operate?]

Endometriosis is a benign chronic inflammatory disease, whose pathogenesis is still unclear. Endometriosis is responsible for infertility and/or pelvic pain. One of the most important features of the disease is the heterogeneity (clinical and anatomical: superficial peritoneal, ovarian and/or deep infiltrating lesions). Bowel involvement constitutes one particularly severe form of the disease, affecting 8-12% of women with deep endometriosis. In case of associated infertility, bowel endometriosis constitutes a real therapeutic challenge for gynecologists. Indeed, while complete resection of the lesions alleviates pain and seems to improve spontaneous fertility, surgery remains technically challenging and may cause severe complications. Reverting to assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) is another valuable therapeutic option regarding pregnancy rates. Thus, the choice between surgical management or ART is still debated. Benefits and risks of these two options should be considered and discussed before planning treatment. In the present study, we aimed to answer the question: Bowel endometriosis and infertility: do we need to operate?

Sperm cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator expression level is relevant to fecundity of healthy couples

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is relevant to sperm quality, sperm capacitation and male fertility. However, it is still unknown whether CFTR can be a potential parameter for fecundity prediction in healthy couples. In this study, 135 healthy couples were divided into groups according to their fertility. We demonstrated that the sperm CFTR expression level of healthy males who never impregnated their partners (49 cases, 38.68 ± 2.71%) was significantly lower than that of fertile men (86 cases, 46.35 ± 2.32%). Sperm CFTR expression level accurately corresponded with fertility through the logistic regression model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the cut-off value of sperm CFTR expression level for fecundity prediction was 43.75%. Furthermore, cumulative pregnancy rates (CPRs) of CFTR > 43.75% group and CFTR ≤ 43.75% group during the follow-up periods were 80.6% and 49.3% respectively. Meanwhile, the mean time to pregnancy (TTP) of CFTR ≤ 43.75% group (26.79 ± 2.35) was significantly longer than that of CFTR > 43.75% group (16.46 ± 2.42). Therefore, sperm CFTR expression level is relevant to fecundity of healthy couples and shows potential predictive capacity of fecundity.

The impact of adenomyosis on the outcome of IVF-embryo transfer

Our study examined the impact of adenomyosis on the chance of clinical pregnancy after IVF and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). This was a prospective multicentre study from April 2013 to October 2015. We included 375 women with history of infertility who attended for a 3D scan prior to IVF-ET. A total of 150/375 (40.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 35.2-45.0) women had clinical pregnancy. Women with any feature of adenomyosis had a lower clinical pregnancy rate (21/72 [29.2%, 95% CI 18.6-39.6] versus 129/303 [42.6%, 95% CI 37.1-48.2], P = 0.044, relative risk (RR) 0.68 [95% CI 0.47-1.00]). Logistic regression selected an adenomyosis score of 4 or higher as an independent predictor of clinical pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.15-0.82]). Estimated probability of clinical pregnancy decreased from 42.7% (95% CI 37.1-48.3) for women with no adenomyosis features to 22.9% (95% CI 13.4-32.6) for those with four and 13.0% (95% CI 2.2-23.9) for those with all seven. Women with adenomyosis have lower clinical pregnancy rate after IVF-ET. Condition severity expressed as a number of morphological features on ultrasound scan increases the magnitude of the effect.

Endometriosis and Infertility: A Systematic Review

Endometriosis is one of the most common gynaecological conditions affecting 6% to 12% of women in the reproductive age group. It can be found in 35% to 45% of women who are trying to conceive and are infertile. Infertility is one of the most common problems associated with endometriosis. This review will look at the evidence that endometriosis may lead to infertility and the data looking at whether surgical correction of endometriosis may improve fertility outcomes.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Endometriosis and its Impact upon Fertility: An Updated Australian Series of 307 Cases

Introduction

Colorectal involvement occurs in up to 12% of cases of endometriosis. Various surgical options for its management have been described, including segmental resection and disc excision, with debate surrounding indications for surgery and the impact of such procedures. The current study aimed to describe the experiences of three Australian gynaecologists regarding laparoscopic bowel surgery for colorectal endometriosis.

Methods

The records of three gynaecological surgeons were analysed for patients who underwent surgical removal of colorectal endometriosis by way of appendicectomy, bowel disc excision and/or segmental resection, between 1999 and 2012.

Results

A total of 307 patients were identified. Sixteen (5.2%) underwent appendicectomy, 146 (47.6%) underwent disc excision, 126 (41.0%) underwent segmental resection and 19 (6.2%) underwent simultaneous procedures. The majority of procedures were performed laparoscopically (265 of 307; 86.3%). Nineteen procedures (6.2%) were planned laparotomies due to the known extent of disease. Twenty-three procedures were converted from laparoscopy to laparotomy (conversion rate of 7.5%). Complications occurred in 35 of the 307 cases (11.4%). Sixty-seven women amongst the 122 wishing to conceive post-operatively achieved at least one pregnancy (pregnancy rate of 54.9%). Of the 84 pregnancies achieved amongst the 67 women who conceived, 49 (58.3%) were achieved through assisted reproductive technologies, and 31 pregnancies (36.9%) were conceived spontaneously. This information was unavailable for 4 pregnancies (4.8%).

Conclusions

The current series demonstrates that laparoscopic surgery for severe disease is feasible in specialised centres. Furthermore, such surgery may have a positive impact upon post-operative fertility.

Spontaneous fertility after expectant or surgical management of rectovaginal endometriosis in women with or without ovarian endometrioma: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate spontaneous pregnancy rate (SPRs) of women with rectovaginal endometriosis (RV) with/without ovarian endometrioma (OMA) and treated with the use of expectant or surgical management.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

The study included patients with RV with or without OMA who tried to conceive spontaneously for 1 year either without undergoing surgery (group E; n = 284) or after surgery (group S; n = 221). The study population was further divided into four subgroups: women with RV without OMA who directly tried to conceive (group eRV; n = 121) or tried to conceive after surgery (group sRV; n = 96), and women with RV with OMA who directly tried to conceive (group eOMA; n = 163) or tried to conceive after surgery (group sOMA; n = 125).

INTERVENTIONS(S)

Expectant or surgical management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Crude and cumulative SPRs.

RESULT(S)

At 1 year, crude and cumulative SPRs were lower in group E (17.3% and 23.8%, respectively) than in group S (35.7% and 39.5%). Similarly, crude and cumulative SPRs were lower in group eRV (24.8% and 30.6%) than in group sRV (42.7% and 45.7%, respectively) and in group eOMA (11.7% and 18.0%) than group sOMA (30.4% and 34.5%). At 1 year, crude and cumulative SPRs were higher in group eRV (24.8% and 30.6%) than in group eOMA (11.7% and 18.0%), and in group sRV (42.7% and 45.7%) than in group sOMA (30.4% and 34.5%).

CONCLUSION(S)

Crude and cumulative SPRs are lower in women treated with the use of expectant rather than surgical management. The presence of OMAs decreases SPRs independently from the treatment modality adopted.