1
|
Galbinski S, Kowalewski LS, Grigolo GB, da Silva LR, Jiménez MF, Krause M, Frantz N, Bös-Mikich A. Comparison between two cryopreservation techniques of human ovarian cortex: morphological aspects and the heat shock response (HSR). Cell Stress Chaperones 2021; 27:97-106. [PMID: 35043289 PMCID: PMC8943117 DOI: 10.1007/s12192-022-01252-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was tailored to compare the cryopreservation of the human ovarian cortex using closed metal container vitrification or the slow-freezing technique. Superficial ovarian cortical tissue biopsies were collected from 12 participants who underwent gynaecological videolaparoscopy. The fragmented samples were allocated to three experimental conditions: (a) fresh ovarian tissue, (b) slow-freezing, and (c) vitrification with a metal closed container. After thawing or rewarming, cellular morphological analyses were performed to determine tissue viability. The cellular response to thermal stress was measured by a putative increase in the immune quantification of the heat shock protein 70 kDa (heat shock protein 70 kDa response - HSR) after a heat challenge (2 h exposure at 42 °C). Both the total number of intact follicles and the frequency of primordial follicles were higher in fresh ovarian tissue than in the preserved samples, regardless of the technique employed. There was a trend towards an increase in the absolute number of intact follicles in the tissue preserved by vitrification. After cryopreservation, a higher HSR was obtained after slow-freezing. These results indicate that both cryopreservation techniques present advantages and may be used as alternatives to ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sérgio Galbinski
- Unidade de Reprodução Humana, Hospital Fêmina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sull, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Lucas Stahlhöfer Kowalewski
- Laboratory of Inflammation, Metabolism and Exercise Research (LAPIMEX) and Laboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Gisele Bettú Grigolo
- Laboratory of Inflammation, Metabolism and Exercise Research (LAPIMEX) and Laboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Larissa Ramos da Silva
- Instituto de Ciencias Basicas da Saude, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Mirela Foresti Jiménez
- Unidade de Reprodução Humana, Hospital Fêmina, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sull, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Mauricio Krause
- Laboratory of Inflammation, Metabolism and Exercise Research (LAPIMEX) and Laboratory of Cellular Physiology, Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
| | - Nilo Frantz
- Nilo Frantz Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Adriana Bös-Mikich
- Instituto de Ciencias Basicas da Saude, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|