1
|
Zagouri F, Dimopoulos MA, Andrikopoulou A. PARP inhibitors during conception and pregnancy in breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2025; 210:104696. [PMID: 40068804 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2025] [Accepted: 03/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Approximately 1 in 10 women diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 35 carry germline BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been recently approved in the treatment of both early and advanced breast cancer. However, there are no published cases of exposure to PARP inhibitors during pregnancy. Treatment with PARP inhibitors during pregnancy is currently contraindicated and can potentially harm fertility in young women with breast cancer. We here summarize all clinical and preclinical data on the effect of PARP inhibitors on pregnancy, fertility and breast-feeding to provide guidance on their optimal use in women of childbearing potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flora Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School, Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528, Greece.
| | - Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School, Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528, Greece.
| | - Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Medical School, Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Warp ML, Grindstad T, Skåra KH, Magnus MC, Håberg SE, Morken N, Romundstad LB, Ramlau‐Hansen CH, Hanevik HI. Maternal time interval between menarche and childbirth is associated with daughter's age at menarche. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2025; 104:1101-1111. [PMID: 40388364 PMCID: PMC12087503 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.15088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2024] [Revised: 01/27/2025] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 05/21/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women's reproductive lifespan has increased over the past two decades. Simultaneously, female reproductive behavior has changed, with increasing age at first birth. Early menarche has been associated with adverse health outcomes, but research investigating the association between maternal age at childbirth and daughter's age at menarche is, so far, inconclusive. Whether the interval between menarche and childbirth or between childbirth and menopause among mothers is associated with age at menarche in daughters is not known. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a cohort study with retrospectively collected data including mothers and daughters participating in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study. Within this cohort, we identified two study populations. First, we included 14 576 mother-daughter pairs with complete information on maternal age at menarche and childbirth and the daughter's age at menarche. Second, we included 1350 mother-daughter pairs with complete information on maternal age at childbirth and natural menopause, and daughter's age at menarche. We calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a discrete survival analysis for daughters' age at menarche by time intervals from menarche to childbirth or from childbirth to menopause in mothers. We adjusted for relevant covariates. RESULTS We found 5% lower yearly odds (partially adjusted OR 0.95 (CI 0.90-0.99)) of reaching menarche among daughters born by mothers <16 years after menarche compared to the reference category born 16-20 years following menarche. After additionally adjusting for maternal birth year, the effect estimate was further reduced (fully adjusted OR 0.79 (CI 0.74-0.84)). Among daughters born by mothers >20 years after menarche, the likelihood of early menarche was higher (fully adjusted OR 1.19 (CI 1.13-1.27)) compared to the reference category. Regarding the childbirth-menopause interval, our findings did not reach statistical significance in either of our models. CONCLUSIONS Daughters born to mothers with a shorter time interval (<16 years) between menarche and childbirth have a lower likelihood of experiencing early menarche compared to the reference category (16-20 years), and daughters born to mothers with a longer time interval from menarche to childbirth (>20 years) have a higher likelihood of reaching early menarche.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Landås Warp
- Telemark Hospital Trust, Fertilitetsavdelingen SørPorsgrunnNorway
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
- Department of Clinical ScienceUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Thea Grindstad
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
| | - Karoline H. Skåra
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
| | - Maria C. Magnus
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
| | - Siri E. Håberg
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Nils‐Halvdan Morken
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
- Department of Clinical ScienceUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Liv Bente Romundstad
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
- Volvat Spiren Fertility ClinicTrondheimNorway
| | | | - Hans Ivar Hanevik
- Telemark Hospital Trust, Fertilitetsavdelingen SørPorsgrunnNorway
- Centre for Fertility and HealthNorwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mavaddat N, Frost D, Zhao E, Barnes DR, Ahmed M, Barwell J, Brady AF, Brennan P, Conti H, Cook J, Copeland H, Davidson R, Donaldson A, Douglas E, Gallagher D, Hart R, Izatt L, Kemp Z, Lalloo F, Miedzybrodzka Z, Morrison PJ, Murray JE, Murray A, Musgrave H, Searle C, Side L, Snape K, Tripathi V, Walker L, Archer S, Evans DG, Tischkowitz M, Antoniou AC, Easton DF. Distribution of age at natural menopause, age at menarche, menstrual cycle length, height and BMI in BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers and non-carriers: results from EMBRACE. Breast Cancer Res 2025; 27:87. [PMID: 40399999 PMCID: PMC12093752 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-025-02030-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2025] [Accepted: 04/20/2025] [Indexed: 05/23/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carriers of germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are at higher risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer than the general population. It is unclear if these PVs influence other breast or ovarian cancer risk factors, including age at menopause (ANM), age at menarche (AAM), menstrual cycle length, BMI or height. There is a biological rationale for associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs and reproductive traits, for example involving DNA damage and repair mechanisms. The evidence for or against such associations is limited. METHODS We used data on 3,046 BRCA1 and 3,264 BRCA2 PV carriers, and 2,857 non-carrier female relatives of PV carriers from the Epidemiological Study of Familial Breast Cancer (EMBRACE). Associations between ANM and PV carrier status was evaluated using linear regression models allowing for censoring. AAM, menstrual cycle length, BMI, and height in carriers and non-carriers were compared using linear and multinomial logistic regression. Analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, and weighted analyses carried out to account for non-random sampling with respect to cancer status. RESULTS No statistically significant difference in ANM between carriers and non-carriers was observed in analyses accounting for censoring. Linear regression effect sizes for ANM were -0.002 (95%CI: -0.401, 0.397) and -0.172 (95%CI: -0.531, 0.188), for BRCA1 and BRCA2 PV carriers respectively, compared with non-carrier women. The distributions of AAM, menstrual cycle length and BMI were similar between PV carriers and non-carriers, but BRCA1 PV carriers were slightly taller on average than non-carriers (0.5 cm difference, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Information on the distribution of cancer risk factors in PV carriers is needed for incorporating these factors into multifactorial cancer risk prediction algorithms. Contrary to previous reports, we found no evidence that BRCA1 or BRCA2 PV are associated with hormonal or anthropometric factors, except for a weak association with height. We highlight methodological considerations and data limitations inherent in studies aiming to address this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasim Mavaddat
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Debra Frost
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emily Zhao
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Clinical Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Julian Barwell
- Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Angela F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Brennan
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hector Conti
- All Wales Medical Genomics Services, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK
| | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Harriet Copeland
- Department Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, South Glasgow University Hospitals, Glasgow, UK
| | - Alan Donaldson
- Clinical Genetics Department, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Emma Douglas
- West Midlands Regional Clinical Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Gallagher
- Trinity St Jame's Cancer Institute, Cancer Genetics Service, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rachel Hart
- Liverpool Women's Hospital Cheshire and Merseyside Genetics, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Zoe Kemp
- Royal Marsden Hospital, NHS Trust, London, England, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Zosia Miedzybrodzka
- NHS Grampian, North of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Clinical Genetics Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Jennie E Murray
- South East Scotland Clinical Genetics Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alex Murray
- All Wales Medical Genomics Service, Wales Genomic Health Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Hannah Musgrave
- Leeds Genomic Medicine Service, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Searle
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lucy Side
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust and Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Katie Snape
- Medical Genetics Unit, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Vishakha Tripathi
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lisa Walker
- Oxford Centre for Genomic Medicine, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomic Science, University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Winship AL, Alesi LR, Stringer JM, Cao Y, Lewis YM, Tu L, Swindells EOK, Giridharan S, Cai X, Griffiths MJ, Zerafa N, Gilham L, Hickey M, Hutt KJ. Conditional loss of Brca1 in oocytes causes reduced litter size, ovarian reserve depletion and impaired oocyte in vitro maturation with advanced reproductive age in mice. EBioMedicine 2024; 106:105262. [PMID: 39084071 PMCID: PMC11342213 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An estimated 1 in 350 women carry germline BRCA1/2 mutations, which confer an increased risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer, and may also contribute to subfertility. All mature, sex steroid-producing ovarian follicles are drawn from the pool of non-renewable primordial follicles, termed the 'ovarian reserve'. The clinical implications of early ovarian reserve exhaustion extend beyond infertility, to include the long-term adverse health consequences of loss of endocrine function and premature menopause. We aimed to determine whether conditional loss of Brca1 in oocytes impacts ovarian follicle numbers, oocyte quality and fertility in mice with advancing maternal age. We also aimed to determine the utility of AMH as a marker of ovarian function, by assessing circulating AMH levels in mice and women with BRCA1/2 mutations, and correlating this with ovarian follicle counts. METHODS In this study, we addressed a longstanding question in the field regarding the functional consequences of BRCA1 inactivation in oocytes. To recapitulate loss of BRCA1 protein function in oocytes, we generated mice with conditional gene deletion of Brca1 in oocytes using Gdf9-Cre recombinase (WT: Brca1fl/flGdf9+/+; cKO: Brca1fl/flGdf9cre/+). FINDINGS While the length of the fertile lifespan was not altered between groups after a comprehensive breeding trial, conditional loss of Brca1 in oocytes led to reduced litter size in female mice. Brca1 cKO animals had a reduced ovarian reserve and oocyte maturation was impaired with advanced maternal age at postnatal day (PN)300, compared to WT animals. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations (the gold-standard indirect marker of the ovarian reserve used in clinical practice) were not predictive of reduced primordial follicle number in Brca1 cKO mice versus WT. Furthermore, we found no correlation between follicle number or density and serum AMH concentrations in matched samples from a small cohort of premenopausal women with BRCA1/2 mutations. INTERPRETATION Together, our data demonstrate that BRCA1 is a key regulator of oocyte number and quality in females and suggest that caution should be used in relying on AMH as a reliable marker of the ovarian reserve in this context. FUNDING This work was made possible through Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS. This work was supported by funding from the Australian Research Council (ALW - DE21010037 and KJH - FT190100265), as well as the National Breast Cancer Foundation (IIRS-22-092) awarded to ALW and KJH. LRA, YML, LT, EOKS and MG were supported by Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarships. LRA, YML and LT were also supported by a Monash Graduate Excellence Scholarship. YC, SG and XC were supported by Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute PhD Scholarships. LRA was also supported by a Monash University ECPF24-6809920940 Fellowship. JMS was supported by NHMRC funding (2011299). MH was supported by an NHMRC Investigator Grant (1193838).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Winship
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| | - Lauren R Alesi
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jessica M Stringer
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Yujie Cao
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Yasmin M Lewis
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Tu
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Elyse O K Swindells
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Saranya Giridharan
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Xuebi Cai
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Meaghan J Griffiths
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; University of Edinburgh, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nadeen Zerafa
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Leslie Gilham
- Breast Cancer Network Australia and Breast Cancer Trials Australia, Camberwell, VIC, Australia
| | - Martha Hickey
- Gynaecology Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Karla J Hutt
- Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Suzuki R, Tan X, Szymanska KJ, Kubikova N, Perez CA, Wells D, Oktay KH. The role of declining ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) function in oocyte aging. Cell Death Discov 2024; 10:302. [PMID: 38914566 PMCID: PMC11196715 DOI: 10.1038/s41420-024-02041-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Despite the advances in the understanding of reproductive physiology, the mechanisms underlying ovarian aging are still not deciphered. Recent research found an association between impaired ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair mechanisms and oocyte aging. However, direct evidence connecting ATM-mediated pathway function decline and impaired oocyte quality is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine the role of ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair in the maintenance of oocyte quality in a mouse oocyte knockdown model. Gene interference, in vitro culture, parthenogenesis coupled with genotoxicity assay approaches, as well as molecular cytogenetic analyses based upon next-generation sequencing, were used to test the hypothesis that intact ATM function is critical in the maintenance of oocyte quality. We found that ATM knockdown impaired oocyte quality, resulting in poor embryo development. ATM knockdown significantly lowered or blocked the progression of meiosis in vitro, as well as retarding and reducing embryo cleavage after parthenogenesis. After ATM knockdown, all embryos were of poor quality, and none reached the blastocyst stage. ATM knockdown was also associated with an increased aneuploidy rate compared to controls. Finally, ATM knockdown increased the sensitivity of the oocytes to a genotoxic active metabolite of cyclophosphamide, with increased formation of DNA DSBs, reduced survival, and earlier apoptotic death compared to controls. These findings suggest a key role for ATM in maintaining oocyte quality and resistance to genotoxic stress, and that the previously observed age-induced decline in oocyte ATM function may be a prime factor contributing to oocyte aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reiko Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Xiujuan Tan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Katarzyna J Szymanska
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Nada Kubikova
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Columba Avila Perez
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Dagan Wells
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Juno Genetics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kutluk H Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stenta T, Assis M, Ayers K, Tucker EJ, Halman A, Gook D, Sinclair AH, Elliott DA, Jayasinghe Y, Conyers R. Pharmacogenomic studies of fertility outcomes in pediatric cancer survivors - A systematic review. Clin Transl Sci 2024; 17:e13827. [PMID: 38924306 PMCID: PMC11199333 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
For the same age, sex, and dosage, there can be significant variation in fertility outcomes in childhood cancer survivors. Genetics may explain this variation. This study aims to: (i) review the genetic contributions to infertility, (ii) search for pharmacogenomic studies looking at interactions of cancer treatment, genetic predisposition and fertility-related outcomes. Systematic searches in MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Classic+Embase, and PubMed were conducted using the following selection criteria: (i) pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors, below 25 years old at the time of diagnosis, (ii) fertility outcome measures after cancer therapy, (iii) genetic considerations. Studies were excluded if they were (i) conducted in animal models, (ii) were not published in English, (iii) editorial letters, (iv) theses. Articles were screened in Covidence by at least two independent reviewers, followed by data extraction and a risk of bias assessment using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Eight articles were reviewed with a total of 29 genes. Outcome measures included sperm concentration, azoospermia, AMH levels, assessment of premature menopause, ever being pregnant or siring a pregnancy. Three studies included replication cohorts, which attempted replication of SNP findings for NPY2R, BRSK1, FANCI, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP2B6. Six studies were rated with a high risk of bias. Differing methods may explain a lack of replication, and small cohorts may have contributed to few significant findings. Larger, prospective longitudinal studies with an unbiased genome-wide focus will be important to replicate significant results, which can be applied clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayla Stenta
- Cancer Therapies, Stem Cell MedicineMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Michael Assis
- Cancer Therapies, Stem Cell MedicineMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn HealthRoyal Women's Hospital, University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Katie Ayers
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Reproductive DevelopmentMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Elena J. Tucker
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Reproductive DevelopmentMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Andreas Halman
- Cancer Therapies, Stem Cell MedicineMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Victorian Clinical Genetics ServicesMurdoch Children's Research InstituteMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Debra Gook
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn HealthRoyal Women's Hospital, University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Gynaecology, Royal Children‘s HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Reproductive Services, The Royal Women's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Andrew H. Sinclair
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Reproductive DevelopmentMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - David A. Elliott
- Cancer Therapies, Stem Cell MedicineMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Yasmin Jayasinghe
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn HealthRoyal Women's Hospital, University of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Gynaecology, Royal Children‘s HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| | - Rachel Conyers
- Cancer Therapies, Stem Cell MedicineMurdoch Children's Research InstituteParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PaediatricsUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
- Children's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's HospitalParkvilleVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Silvestris E, Cormio G, Loizzi V, Corrado G, Arezzo F, Petracca EA. Fertility Preservation in BRCA1/2 Germline Mutation Carriers: An Overview. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:615. [PMID: 38792636 PMCID: PMC11122448 DOI: 10.3390/life14050615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are responsible for a higher incidence of breast and ovarian cancer (from 55% up to 70% vs. 12% in the general population). If their functions have been widely investigated in the onset of these malignancies, still little is known about their role in fertility impairment. Cancer patients treated with antineoplastic drugs can be susceptible to their gonadotoxicity and, in women, some of them can induce apoptotic program in premature ovarian follicles, progressive depletion of ovarian reserve and, consequently, cancer treatment-related infertility (CTRI). BRCA variants seem to be associated with early infertility, thus accelerating treatment impairment of ovaries and making women face the concrete possibility of an early pregnancy. In this regard, fertility preservation (FP) procedures should be discussed in oncofertility counseling-from the first line of prevention with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to the new experimental ovarian stem cells (OSCs) model as a new way to obtain in vitro-differentiated oocytes, several techniques may represent a valid option to BRCA-mutated patients. In this review, we revisit knowledge about BRCA involvement in lower fertility, pregnancy feasibility, and the fertility preservation (FP) options available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Silvestris
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Vera Loizzi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
| | - Giacomo Corrado
- Department of Woman, Child Health and Public Health, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, 00136 Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesca Arezzo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
| | - Easter Anna Petracca
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (G.C.); (V.L.); (F.A.); (E.A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dias Nunes J, Demeestere I, Devos M. BRCA Mutations and Fertility Preservation. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 25:204. [PMID: 38203374 PMCID: PMC10778779 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25010204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Hereditary cancers mostly affect the adolescent and young adult population (AYA) at reproductive age. Mutations in BReast CAncer (BRCA) genes are responsible for the majority of cases of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 and BRCA2 act as tumor suppressor genes as they are key regulators of DNA repair through homologous recombination. Evidence of the accumulation of DNA double-strand break has been reported in aging oocytes, while BRCA expression decreases, leading to the hypothesis that BRCA mutation may impact fertility. Moreover, patients exposed to anticancer treatments are at higher risk of fertility-related issues, and BRCA mutations could exacerbate the treatment-induced depletion of the ovarian reserve. In this review, we summarized the functions of both genes and reported the current knowledge on the impact of BRCA mutations on ovarian ageing, premature ovarian insufficiency, female fertility preservation strategies and insights about male infertility. Altogether, this review provides relevant up-to-date information on the impact of BRCA1/2 mutations on fertility. Notably, BRCA-mutated patients should be adequately counselled for fertility preservation strategies, considering their higher sensitivity to chemotherapy gonadotoxic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joana Dias Nunes
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (J.D.N.); (M.D.)
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (J.D.N.); (M.D.)
- Fertility Clinic, HUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Melody Devos
- Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium; (J.D.N.); (M.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shen L, Liu J, Luo A, Wang S. The stromal microenvironment and ovarian aging: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:237. [PMID: 38093329 PMCID: PMC10717903 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-023-01300-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
For decades, most studies of ovarian aging have focused on its functional units, known as follicles, which include oocytes and granulosa cells. However, in the ovarian stroma, there are a variety of somatic components that bridge the gap between general aging and ovarian senescence. Physiologically, general cell types, microvascular structures, extracellular matrix, and intercellular molecules affect folliculogenesis and corpus luteum physiology alongside the ovarian cycle. As a result of damage caused by age-related metabolite accumulation and external insults, the microenvironment of stromal cells is progressively remodeled, thus inevitably perturbing ovarian physiology. With the established platforms for follicle cryopreservation and in vitro maturation and the development of organoid research, it is desirable to develop strategies to improve the microenvironment of the follicle by targeting the perifollicular environment. In this review, we summarize the role of stromal components in ovarian aging, describing their age-related alterations and associated effects. Moreover, we list some potential techniques that may mitigate ovarian aging based on their effect on the stromal microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Shen
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Junfeng Liu
- Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Aiyue Luo
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| | - Shixuan Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sii S, Polyakov A, Rozen G, Agresta F, Stern K. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in breast cancer patients: Does oestrogen receptor status make a difference? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 63:774-779. [PMID: 37317583 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of different breast cancer receptor status may impact ovarian stimulation outcomes. AIM To study the association between oestrogen receptor (ER) status in breast cancer patients and fertility preservation outcomes in a major tertiary referral centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women who underwent fertility preservation following the diagnosis of breast cancer from 2008 to 2018 were included in the study. Patient age, ovarian stimulation parameters and laboratory outcomes were recorded and compared between the ER positive and negative groups. The primary outcome was total number of oocytes frozen. Secondary outcomes included total number of oocytes collected, mature oocytes, and embryos frozen. RESULTS The women included in the study (n = 214) were analysed in the following groups based on their fertility preservation method: oocyte freezing (n = 131), embryo freezing (n = 70), and both embryo and oocyte freezing (n = 13). There was an increase in the mean (but not mature) number of oocytes frozen (12.4 and 9.2, P-value = 0.03) favouring the ER positive group, even though the women in this group were older (35.0 and 33.4, P-value of 0.03). There is no difference in the starting follicle-stimulating hormone dose, duration of stimulation, mature oocytes collected, and embryos frozen in both groups. CONCLUSION Patients with ER positive breast cancer may have more positive ovarian stimulation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alex Polyakov
- Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Genia Rozen
- Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Kate Stern
- Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Telfer EE, Grosbois J, Odey YL, Rosario R, Anderson RA. Making a good egg: human oocyte health, aging, and in vitro development. Physiol Rev 2023; 103:2623-2677. [PMID: 37171807 PMCID: PMC10625843 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00032.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Mammalian eggs (oocytes) are formed during fetal life and establish associations with somatic cells to form primordial follicles that create a store of germ cells (the primordial pool). The size of this pool is influenced by key events during the formation of germ cells and by factors that influence the subsequent activation of follicle growth. These regulatory pathways must ensure that the reserve of oocytes within primordial follicles in humans lasts for up to 50 years, yet only approximately 0.1% will ever be ovulated with the rest undergoing degeneration. This review outlines the mechanisms and regulatory pathways that govern the processes of oocyte and follicle formation and later growth, within the ovarian stroma, through to ovulation with particular reference to human oocytes/follicles. In addition, the effects of aging on female reproductive capacity through changes in oocyte number and quality are emphasized, with both the cellular mechanisms and clinical implications discussed. Finally, the details of current developments in culture systems that support all stages of follicle growth to generate mature oocytes in vitro and emerging prospects for making new oocytes from stem cells are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelyn E Telfer
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Johanne Grosbois
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Yvonne L Odey
- Institute of Cell Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Roseanne Rosario
- Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Biomedical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prieto-Huecas L, Piera-Jordán CÁ, Serrano De La Cruz-Delgado V, Zaragoza-Martí A, García-Velert MB, Tordera-Terrades C, Sánchez-Sansegundo M, Martín-Manchado L. Assessment of Nutritional Status and Its Influence on Ovarian Reserve: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2023; 15:nu15102280. [PMID: 37242163 DOI: 10.3390/nu15102280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nowadays, there is a growing interest in the relationship among lifestyle, reproductive health, and fertility. Recent investigations highlight the influence of environmental and lifestyle factors such as stress, diet, and nutritional status on reproductive health. The aim of this review was to determine the influence of nutritional status on ovarian reserve in order to improve the reproductive health of women of childbearing age. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out following the PRISMA method. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool. Data were extracted, and the results were summarized into two blocks: according to the technique used to assess ovarian reserve and nutritional status; according to the results found in the relationship between ovarian reserve and nutritional status. RESULTS A total of 22 articles involving 5929 women were included. In 12 of the included articles (54.5%), a relationship between nutritional status and ovarian reserve was demonstrated. In seven publications (31.8%), the increased body mass index (BMI) led to a decrease in ovarian reserve, two of them (0.9%) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome, showing a decrease only if BMI > 25. In two articles (0.9%), there was a negative relationship between ovarian reserve and waist-to-hip ratio, and in one (0.45%), a positive relationship was shown between ovarian reserve and testosterone levels, the latter being related to body mass index. In five articles (22.7%), body mass index was used as a confounder and was negatively related to ovarian reserve, and in another four (18%), no correlation was found. CONCLUSIONS Ovarian reserve appears to be influenced by nutritional status. A high body mass index has a negative impact on the ovary, decreasing antral follicle count and anti-Müllerian hormone. Oocyte quality is compromised, increasing the rate of reproductive problems and the demand for assisted reproductive techniques. Further studies are needed to understand which dietary factors have the greatest effect on ovarian reserve in order to promote reproductive health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Prieto-Huecas
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Service, Hospital Marina Salud, 03700 Denia, Spain
| | | | | | - Ana Zaragoza-Martí
- Department of Nursing, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
- Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL-FISABIO Foundation), 03010 Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Santulli P, Blockeel C, Bourdon M, Coticchio G, Campbell A, De Vos M, Macklon KT, Pinborg A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Fertility preservation in women with benign gynaecological conditions. Hum Reprod Open 2023; 2023:hoad012. [PMID: 37124950 PMCID: PMC10130191 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Although a wealth of data has been published regarding fertility preservation (FP) in women with malignant diseases who receive gonadotoxic treatment, the role of FP in non-malignant conditions has been studied to a much lesser extent. These include benign haematological, autoimmune, and genetic disorders, as well as a multitude of benign gynaecological conditions (BGCs) that may compromise ovarian reserve and/or reproductive potential due to pathogenic mechanisms or as a result of medical or surgical treatments. Alongside accumulating data that document the reproductive potential of cryopreserved oocytes and ovarian tissue, there is potential interest in FP for women with BGCs at risk of infertility; however, there are currently insufficient data about FP in women with BGCs to develop guidelines for clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to appraise the available evidence regarding FP for BGC and discuss potential strategies for FP based on estimated ovarian impairment and on short-term and long-term reproductive goals of patients. Cost-effectiveness considerations and patients' perspectives will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Santulli
- Correspondence address. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique II et Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU Cochin—Bâtiment Port Royal, 123 Boulevard de Port-Royal 75679 Paris 14, France. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | - Michel De Vos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kirsten Tryde Macklon
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Juan A Garcia-Velasco
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI-RMA), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
C.E DK, C. VTT, J.C. EM, G.W.M. LE, Irene H, Mariette G, J.T. VGR, Willem V, D. LK, J.M. BF, M.E. BA. The Impact of BRCA1- and BRCA2 Mutations on Ovarian Reserve Status. Reprod Sci 2022; 30:270-282. [PMID: 35705781 PMCID: PMC9810575 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00997-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether female BRCA1- and BRCA2 mutation carriers have a reduced ovarian reserve status, based on serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, antral follicle count (AFC) and ovarian response to ovarian hyperstimulation. A prospective, multinational cohort study was performed between October 2014 and December 2019. Normo-ovulatory women, aged 18-41 years old, applying for their first PGT-cycle for reason of a BRCA mutation (cases) or other genetic diseases unrelated to ovarian reserve (controls), were asked to participate. All participants underwent a ICSI-PGT cycle with a long-agonist protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Linear and logistic regression models were used to compare AMH, AFC and ovarian response in cases and controls. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on BRCA1- and BRCA2 mutation carrier subgroups. Thirty-six BRCA mutation carriers (18 BRCA1- and 18 BRCA2 mutation carriers) and 126 controls, with mean female age 30.4 years, were included in the primary analysis. Unadjusted median AMH serum levels (IQR) were 2.40 (1.80-3.00) ng/ml in BRCA mutation carriers and 2.15 (1.30-3.40) ng/ml in controls (p = 0.45), median AFC (IQR) was 15.0 (10.8-20.3) and 14.5 (9.0-20.0), p = 0.54, respectively. Low response rate was 22.6% among BRCA mutation carriers and 9.3% among controls, p = 0.06. Median number of retrieved oocytes was 9 (6-14) in carriers and 10 (7-13) in controls, p = 0.36. No substantial differences were observed between BRCA1- and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Based on several biomarkers, no meaningful differences in ovarian reserve status were observed in female BRCA mutation carriers compared to controls in the context of ICSI-PGT treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drechsel Katja C.E
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - van Tilborg Theodora C.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eijkemans Marinus J.C.
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lentjes Eef G.W.M.
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory (CDL), University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Homminga Irene
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Section Reproductive Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Goddijn Mariette
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Reproductive Medicine Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, AZ 1105 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - van Golde Ron J.T.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands ,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Verpoest Willem
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lichtenbelt Klaske D.
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Broekmans Frank J.M.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bos Anna M.E.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Maidarti M, Tarumi W, Takae S, Wiweko B, Suzuki N. Paclitaxel is evidence to reduce growing ovarian follicle growth in mice model study. Toxicol In Vitro 2022; 83:105386. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
16
|
Zhou B, Kwan B, Desai MJ, Nalawade V, Ruddy KJ, Nathan PC, Henk HJ, Murphy JD, Whitcomb BW, Su HI. Long-term antimüllerian hormone patterns differ by cancer treatment exposures in young breast cancer survivors. Fertil Steril 2022; 117:1047-1056. [PMID: 35216831 PMCID: PMC9081208 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare antimüllerian hormone (AMH) patterns by cancer status and treatment exposures across 6 years after incident breast cancer using administrative data. DESIGN In a cross-sectional design, AMH levels in patients who developed incident breast cancer between ages 15-39 years during 2005-2019 were matched 1:10 to levels in females without cancer in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. Modeled AMH patterns were compared among cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, non-cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, no chemotherapy, and no breast cancer groups. SETTING Commercially insured females in the United States. PATIENT(S) Females with and without breast cancer. EXPOSURE(S) Breast cancer, cyclophosphamide- and non-cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) AMH levels. RESULT(S) A total of 233 patients with breast cancer (mean age, 34 years; standard deviation, 3.7 years) contributed 278 AMH levels over a median of 2 years (range, 0-6.7 years) after diagnosis; 52% received cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, 17% received non-cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy (80% platinum-based), and 31% received no chemotherapy. A total of 2,777 matched females without cancer contributed 2,780 AMH levels. The pattern of AMH levels differed among the 4 groups. Among females without cancer and breast cancer survivors who did not undergo chemotherapy, AMH declined linearly over time. In contrast, among those who received cyclophosphamide-based and noncyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, a nonlinear pattern of AMH level of initial fall during chemotherapy, followed by an increase over 2-4 years, and then by a plateau over 1-2 years before a decline was observed. CONCLUSION(S) In breast cancer survivors, AMH levels from administrative data supported ovarian toxicity of non-cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in breast cancer and efficiently depicted the timing and duration of changes in ovarian reserve to reflect the residual reproductive lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth Zhou
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Brian Kwan
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Milli J. Desai
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Vinit Nalawade
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Kathryn J. Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Paul C. Nathan
- The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue Toronto ON M5G 1X8, CA
| | - Henry J. Henk
- OptumLabs, 11000 Optum Cir, Eden Prarie, MN 55344, USA
| | - James D. Murphy
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Brian W. Whitcomb
- Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, 433 Arnold House, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA
| | - H. Irene Su
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Vriesen N, Carmany EP, Natoli JL. Clinical outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes: A systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2022; 42:201-211. [PMID: 34981540 DOI: 10.1002/pd.6084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of the published literature on clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCS). METHODS Three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE) were searched for publications related to PGT-M for HCS. When appropriate, weighted means were used to calculate clinical and live birth rates. RESULTS We identified 22 publications that reported on clinical and/or psychosocial outcomes of PGT-M for HCS. The weighted mean clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per embryo was 33.5% (11 studies, 95% CI: 29.1%, 38.2%), and the CPR per cycle with embryonic transfer was 40.1% (14 studies, 95% CI: 36.1%, 44.3%). The weighted mean live birth rate (LBR) per embryo was 28.9% (11 studies, 95% CI: 24.7%, 33.4%) and the LBR per cycle with embryonic transfer was 33.2% (13 studies, 95% CI: 29.2%, 37.4%). The limited literature regarding the psychosocial outcomes of PGT-M for HCS suggests reproductive decision-making is difficult and additional support may be desired. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that CPR and LBR following PGT-M for HCS are comparable to other monogenic disorders. Heterogeneity across studies suggests the overall CPR and LBR found may not be applicable to all HCS indications and PGT-M methodologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Vriesen
- Division of Medical Genetics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA.,Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Erin P Carmany
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Jaime L Natoli
- Department of Clinical Analysis, Evidence-Based Medicine Services, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gasparri ML, Di Micco R, Zuber V, Taghavi K, Bianchini G, Bellaminutti S, Meani F, Graffeo R, Candiani M, Mueller MD, Papadia A, Gentilini OD. Ovarian reserve of women with and without BRCA pathogenic variants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 2021; 60:155-162. [PMID: 34627117 PMCID: PMC8501498 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preliminary clinical evidence suggests a detrimental effect of pathogenic variants of BRCA1 and 2 genes on fertility outcome. This meta-analysis evaluates whether women carrying BRCA mutations (BRCAm) have decreased ovarian reserve, in terms of Anti-Muellerian Hormone (AMH), compared to women without BRCAm (wild-type). MATERIAL AND METHODS Systematic searches of PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct and the Cochrane Library from inception until July 2020 were conducted. All studies comparing AMH level in fertile age women, with and without BRCA pathogenic variants were considered. Sub-analyses were performed according to age, presence of breast cancer, and type of mutation. RESULTS Among 64 studies, 10 series were included. For the entire cohort, a trend of reduced AMH level were found between BRCAm carriers and women without pathogenic variants. BRCAm carriers aged 41-years or younger had lower AMH levels compared to 41-years or younger wild type women (OR: 0.73 [95%CI-1.12;-0.35]; p = 0.0002). This finding was confirmed for BRCA1m carriers (OR: 1 [95%CI-1.96;-0.05]; p = 0.004) whereas no difference was observed between BRCA2m carriers and wild type women. The same analysis on breast cancer patients with and without BRCAm achieved the same results. CONCLUSION Young BRCA1m carriers seem to have lower AMH level compared with wild type women and therefore a potential decreased ovarian reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Luisa Gasparri
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Rosa Di Micco
- Breast Surgical Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Veronica Zuber
- Breast Surgical Unit, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Katayoun Taghavi
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Giampaolo Bianchini
- Department of Medical Oncology, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Serena Bellaminutti
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Meani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Rossella Graffeo
- Institute of Oncology of Southern Switzerland (IOSI) and Breast Unit of Southern Switzerland (CSSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Bern and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, via tesserete 46, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, via Giuseppe Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Buonomo B, Massarotti C, Dellino M, Anserini P, Ferrari A, Campanella M, Magnotti M, De Stefano C, Peccatori FA, Lambertini M. Reproductive issues in carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes: an expert meeting. BMC Med 2021; 19:205. [PMID: 34503502 PMCID: PMC8431919 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02081-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthy individuals and patients with cancer who are carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes face multiple reproductive challenges that require appropriate counseling and specific expertise. MAIN BODY On December 5th-7th, 2019, patient advocates and physicians with expertise in the field of reproductive medicine, fertility preservation, and oncology were invited to "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital in Avellino (Italy) for a workshop on reproductive management of women with germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes. From the discussion regarding the current evidence and future prospective in the field, eight main research questions were formulated and eight recommendations were developed regarding fertility, fertility preservation, preimplantation genetic testing, and pregnancy in healthy carriers and patients with cancer. CONCLUSION Several misconceptions about the topic persist among health care providers and patients often resulting in a discontinuous and suboptimal management. With the aim to offer patient-tailored counseling about reproductive issues, both awareness of current evidences and research should be promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Buonomo
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Anserini
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Campanella
- aBRCAdabra, National Patient Advocacy Association for carriers of BRCA genes mutation, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mirosa Magnotti
- ACTO Campania, Alleanza Contro il Tumore Ovarico, Avellino, Italy
| | - Cristofaro De Stefano
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy. .,Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Song Y, Liu H. A review on the relationship between anti-mullerian hormone and fertility in treating young breast cancer patients. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2021; 21:295. [PMID: 34376160 PMCID: PMC8353739 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01420-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Despite the fact that the long-term survival rate of breast cancer patients had been significantly improved owing to the systemic breast cancer therapies, there are still some side effects such as amenorrhea and fertility retention to be resolved, leaving it an important thing to understand the possible side effects on fertility and fertility preservation strategies while undergoing breast cancer treatment, due to the fact that most young patients hope to become pregnant and have children after breast cancer treatment. With anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) being the most sensitive marker for predicting ovarian function in young premenopausal women with breast cancer, this review is aimed to provide the additional guidance for clinical application of AMH by exploring the impacts of AMH on the fertility of young breast cancer patients, the relationship between AMH and metabolism, and the relationship between BRAC gene mutation and fertility protection strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixuan Song
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China
| | - Hong Liu
- The Second Surgical Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Denis-Laroque L, Drouet Y, Plotton I, Chopin N, Bonadona V, Lornage J, Salle B, Lasset C, Rousset-Jablonski C. Anti-müllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant: A retrospective cohort study. Breast 2021; 59:239-247. [PMID: 34304065 PMCID: PMC8326804 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2021.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Some studies suggested a decreased ovarian reserve among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, with conflicting results. Methods We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study of ovarian reserve and spontaneous fertility comparing BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers to controls (women who attended consultations to discuss fertility preservation before gonadotoxic treatment). Measures of associations between plasma AMH concentration, AFC and BRCA1/2 status were modelled by nonlinear generalized additive regression models and logistic regressions adjusted for age at plasma storage, oral contraceptive use, body mass index, cigarette smoking, and the AMH assay technique. Results The whole population comprised 119 BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and 92 controls. A total of 110 women (42 carriers, among whom 30 were cancer-free, and 68 controls) underwent an ovarian reserve evaluation. Spontaneous fertility analysis included all women who previously attempted to become pregnant (134 women). We observed a tendency towards a premature decrease in ovarian reserve in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers, but no difference in mean AMH or AFC levels was found between BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and controls. An analysis of the extreme levels of AMH (≤5 pmol/l) and AFC (≤7 follicles) by logistic regression suggested a higher risk of low ovarian reserve among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.00–12.8, p = 0.05; and adjusted OR = 4.99, 95% CI = 1.10–22.62, p = 0.04, respectively). Discussion Attention should be paid to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers’ ovarian reserve, considering this potential risk of premature alteration. A tendency towards a premature decrease in the ovarian reserve in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers was found. BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers presented a higher risk of a low ovarian reserve. Information and education regarding reproduction is mandatory among BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie Denis-Laroque
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Youenn Drouet
- Centre Léon Bérard, Département Prévention et Santé Publique, 28, Rue Laënnec, Lyon, 69008, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, 16, rue Raphael Dubois, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France
| | - Ingrid Plotton
- Hormonology and Molecular Endocrinology, Biology and Est Pathology Center, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69500, U1208, Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, Bron, France
| | - Nicolas Chopin
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008, Lyon, France
| | - Valérie Bonadona
- Centre Léon Bérard, Département Prévention et Santé Publique, 28, Rue Laënnec, Lyon, 69008, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, 16, rue Raphael Dubois, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France
| | - Jacqueline Lornage
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Service de Médecine de La Reproduction, Bron, France
| | - Bruno Salle
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Service de Médecine de La Reproduction, Bron, France
| | - Christine Lasset
- Centre Léon Bérard, Département Prévention et Santé Publique, 28, Rue Laënnec, Lyon, 69008, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, 16, rue Raphael Dubois, Villeurbanne Cedex, 69622, France
| | - Christine Rousset-Jablonski
- Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Surgical Oncology, 28 rue Laënnec, 69008, Lyon, France; Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 165 Chemin Du Grand Revoyet, 69310, Pierre-Bénite, France; Research on Healthcare Performance RESHAPE, INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sun B, Yeh J. Onco-fertility and personalized testing for potential for loss of ovarian reserve in patients undergoing chemotherapy: proposed next steps for development of genetic testing to predict changes in ovarian reserve. FERTILITY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 7:13. [PMID: 34193292 PMCID: PMC8244159 DOI: 10.1186/s40738-021-00105-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Women of reproductive age undergoing chemotherapy face the risk of irreversible ovarian insufficiency. Current methods of ovarian reserve testing do not accurately predict future reproductive potential for patients undergoing chemotherapy. Genetic markers that more accurately predict the reproductive potential of each patient undergoing chemotherapy would be critical tools that would be useful for evidence-based fertility preservation counselling. To assess the possible approaches to take to develop personalized genetic testing for these patients, we review current literature regarding mechanisms of ovarian damage due to chemotherapy and genetic variants associated with both the damage mechanisms and primary ovarian insufficiency. The medical literature point to a number of genetic variants associated with mechanisms of ovarian damage and primary ovarian insufficiency. Those variants that appear at a higher frequency, with known pathways, may be considered as potential genetic markers for predictive ovarian reserve testing. We propose developing personalized testing of the potential for loss of ovarian function for patients with cancer, prior to chemotherapy treatment. There are advantages of using genetic markers complementary to the current ovarian reserve markers of AMH, antral follicle count and day 3 FSH as predictors of preservation of fertility after chemotherapy. Genetic markers will help identify upstream pathways leading to high risk of ovarian failure not detected by present clinical markers. Their predictive value is mechanism-based and will encourage research towards understanding the multiple pathways contributing to ovarian failure after chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bei Sun
- Sackler School of Medicine, New York State/American Program of Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - John Yeh
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, UMass Memorial Medical Center, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Turan V, Lambertini M, Lee DY, Wang E, Clatot F, Karlan BY, Demeestere I, Bang H, Oktay K. Association of Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants With Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient-Level Data. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2016-2024. [PMID: 33891474 PMCID: PMC8260903 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.02880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether germline BRCA (gBRCA) pathogenic variants are associated with decreased ovarian reserve. MATERIALS AND METHODS An individual patient-level data meta-analysis was performed using five data sets on 828 evaluable women who were tested for gBRCA. Of those, 250 carried gBRCA, whereas 578 had tested negative and served as controls. Of the women with gBRCA, four centers studied those affected with breast cancer (n = 161) and one studied unaffected individuals (n = 89). The data were adjusted for the center, age, body mass index, smoking, and oral contraceptive pill use before the final analysis. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in affected women were drawn before presystemic therapy. RESULTS The mean age of women with versus without gBRCA1/2 (34.1 ± 4.9 v 34.3 ± 4.8 years; P = .48) and with gBRCA1 versus gBRCA2 (33.7 ± 4.9 v 34.6 ± 4.8 years; P = .16) was similar. After the adjustments, women with gBRCA1/2 had significantly lower AMH levels compared with controls (23% lower; 95% CI, 4 to 38; P = .02). When the adjusted analysis was limited to affected women (157 with gBRCA v 524 without, after exclusions), the difference persisted (25% lower; 95% CI, 9 to 38; P = .003). The serum AMH levels were lower in women with gBRCA1 (33% lower; 95% CI, 12 to 49; P = .004) but not gBRCA2 compared with controls (7% lower; 95% CI, 31% lower to 26% higher; P = .64). CONCLUSION Young women with gBRCA pathogenic variants, particularly those affected and with gBRCA1, have lower serum AMH levels compared with controls. They may need to be preferentially counseled about the possibility of shortened reproductive lifespan because of diminished ovarian reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan Turan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health and Technology University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Dong-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Erica Wang
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Florian Clatot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Becquerel Centre, Rouen, France
| | - Beth Y. Karlan
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, CUB-Erasme, and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Heejung Bang
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA
| | - Kutluk Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nikolettos K, Damaskos C, Garmpis N, Nikolettos N. BRCA 1, 2 mutation and earlier menopause. Could BRCA 1, 2 be used as predictor of menopause? Minerva Obstet Gynecol 2021; 74:165-170. [PMID: 34137566 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-606x.21.04813-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Many studies have shown that BRCA mutation is not only related to cancer but also to ovarian aging. Studies in both human and mice oocytes have shown that Double-strand breaks (DSBs) accumulate with age. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have found 44 genetic loci that are related to variations when a female is about to have menopause. BRCA1 is involved in these 44 loci that are associated with the age of menopause. This review has gathered all results of literature search about the association between BRCA genes and early menopause. The majority of the articles found that women with BRCA mutation have earlier menopause compared to non-carriers. In conclusion, in the near future BRCA1,2 genes could be used as predictive biomarkers of menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christos Damaskos
- Renal Transplantation Unit, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece.,N.S. Christeas Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Garmpis
- N.S. Christeas Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Second Department of Propedeutic Surgery, Laiko General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikos Nikolettos
- Obstetric and Gynecologic Clinic, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fertility Preservation and Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
26
|
Winship AL, Griffiths M, Lliberos Requesens C, Sarma U, Phillips KA, Hutt KJ. The PARP inhibitor, olaparib, depletes the ovarian reserve in mice: implications for fertility preservation. Hum Reprod 2021; 35:1864-1874. [PMID: 32604417 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the impact of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, olaparib, alone or in combination with chemotherapy on the ovary in mice? SUMMARY ANSWER Olaparib treatment, when administered alone, depletes primordial follicle oocytes, but olaparib does not exacerbate chemotherapy-mediated ovarian follicle loss in mice. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The ovary contains a finite number of oocytes stored within primordial follicles, which give rise to all mature ovulatory oocytes. Unfortunately, they are highly sensitive to exogenous DNA damaging insults, such as cytotoxic cancer treatments. Members of the PARP family of enzymes are central to the repair of single-strand DNA breaks. PARP inhibitors have shown promising clinical efficacy in reducing tumour burden, by blocking DNA repair capacity. Olaparib is a PARP1/2 inhibitor recently FDA-approved for treatment of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with metastatic breast cancer. It is currently being investigated as an adjunct to standard treatment at an earlier stage, potentially curable, BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer which affects reproductive age women. Despite this, there is no preclinical or clinical information regarding the potential impacts of olaparib on the ovary or on female fertility. Unfortunately, it may be many years before clinical data on fertility outcomes for women treated with PARP inhibitors becomes available, highlighting the importance of rigorous preclinical research using animal models to establish the potential for new cancer therapies to affect the ovary in humans. We aimed to comprehensively determine the impact of olaparib alone, or following chemotherapy, on the ovary in mice. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION On Day 0, mice (n = 5/treatment group) were administered a single intraperitoneal dose of cyclophosphamide (75 mg/kg/body weight), doxorubicin (10 mg/kg), carboplatin (80 mg/kg), paclitaxel (7.5 mg/kg) or vehicle control. From Days 1 to 28, mice were administered subcutaneous olaparib (50 mg/kg) or vehicle control. This regimen is proven to reduce tumour burden in preclinical mouse studies and is also physiologically relevant for women. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Adult female wild-type C57BL6/J mice at peak fertility (8 weeks) were administered a single intraperitoneal dose of chemotherapy, or vehicle, then either subcutaneous olaparib or vehicle for 28 days. Vaginal smears were performed on each animal for 14 consecutive days from Days 15 to 28 to monitor oestrous cycling. At 24 h after final treatment, ovaries were harvested for follicle enumeration and immunohistochemical analysis of primordial follicle remnants (FOXL2 expressing granulosa cells), DNA damage (γH2AX) and analysis of apoptosis by TUNEL assay. Serum was collected to measure circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) concentrations by ELISA. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Olaparib significantly depleted primordial follicles by 36% compared to the control (P < 0.05) but had no impact on other follicle classes, serum AMH, corpora lutea number (indicative of ovulation) or oestrous cycling. Primordial follicle remnants were rarely detected in control ovaries but were significantly elevated in ovaries from mice treated with olaparib alone (P < 0.05). Similarly, DNA damage denoted by γH2AX foci was completely undetectable in primordial follicles of control animals but was observed in ∼10% of surviving primordial follicle oocytes in mice treated with olaparib alone. These observations suggest that functional PARPs are essential for primordial follicle oocyte maintenance and survival. Olaparib did not exacerbate chemotherapy-mediated follicle depletion in the wild-type mouse ovary. LARGE SCALE DATA N/A. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study was performed in mice, so the findings may not translate to women and further studies utilizing human ovarian tissue and sera samples should be performed in the future. Only one long-term time point was analysed, therefore olaparib-mediated follicle damage should be assessed at more immediate time points in the future to support our mechanistic findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Olaparib dramatically depleted primordial follicles and this could be attributed to loss of intrinsic PARP-mediated DNA repair mechanisms. Importantly, diminished ovarian reserve can result in premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility. Notably, the extent of follicle depletion might be enhanced in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, and this is the subject of current investigations. Together, our data suggest that fertility preservation options should be considered for young women prior to olaparib treatment, and that human studies of this issue should be prioritized. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was made possible through Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS. This work was supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC); (K.J.H. #1050130) (A.L.W. #1120300). K.A.P. is a National Breast Cancer Foundation Fellow (Australia-PRAC-17-004). K.A.P. is the Breast Cancer Trials (Australia) Study Chair for the OlympiA clinical trial sponsored by AstraZeneca, the manufacturer of olaparib. All other authors declare no competing financial or other interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Winship
- Ovarian Biology Laboratory, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Stem Cells and Development Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Meaghan Griffiths
- Ovarian Biology Laboratory, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Stem Cells and Development Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Carolina Lliberos Requesens
- Ovarian Biology Laboratory, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Stem Cells and Development Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Urooza Sarma
- Ovarian Biology Laboratory, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Stem Cells and Development Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Karla J Hutt
- Ovarian Biology Laboratory, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Stem Cells and Development Program, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Peregrin-Alvarez I, Fletcher NM, Saed GM, Roman RA, Detti L. Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) regulates BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene expression after ovarian cortex transplantation. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 37:349-352. [PMID: 33084436 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1828328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether recombinant anti-Müllerian hormone (rAMH) could exert an inhibitory function on BRCA1/2 expression in human ovarian cortex. METHODS Pilot study on ovariectomized nude mice xenotransplanted with human vitrified/warmed ovarian cortex and treated with rAMH via infusion pump. Twelve nude mice were ovariectomized and Alzet pumps delivering 1.23 mcg rAMH/day to reach a serum concentration of 17.5 ng/mL, or placebo (controls), were inserted intraabdominally. Previously vitrified/warmed 2x2 mm ovarian cortex fragments were transplanted on day 7 and then harvested on day 14 after pump placement. PCR analyses determined mRNA levels for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the human ovarian cortex. RESULTS In mice treated with rAMH, BRCA1 expression was significantly lower (0.196 fg/µg RNA, IQR 0.158, 0.236) than in controls (0.544 fg/µg RNA, IQR 0.458, 0.554; p = .030), while BRCA2 expression remained similar in rAMH mice (5.355 fg/µg RNA, IQR 4.479, 6.230) and in controls (4.011 fg/µg RNA, IQR 3.650, 4.182; p = .327). CONCLUSION Administration of rAMH in the peri-transplant period caused downregulation of BRCA1, but not of BRCA2 expression, in human ovarian cortex. These results help our understanding of DNA repair mechanism in the ovarian cortex and identify AMH's possible protective effect on ovarian reserve in BRCA1 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Peregrin-Alvarez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Nicole M Fletcher
- The C. S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ghassan M Saed
- The C. S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Robert A Roman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Laura Detti
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
- Women's Health Institute, Department of Ob-Gyn Subspecialty Women's Care, Cleveland Clinic, Women's Health Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cancer survivorship: Reproductive health outcomes should be included in standard toxicity assessments. Eur J Cancer 2021; 144:310-316. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
29
|
La Marca A, Mastellari E. Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:759-777. [PMID: 33495935 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02067-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The current review aims to summarize the data available concerning the applicability of fertility preservation techniques to genetic conditions at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). METHODS A literature review through the PubMed Database was carried out. RESULTS About 10% of cases of POI is related to genetic diseases. The most frequent conditions associated with POI are Turner syndrome and fragile X pre-mutation; mutation of BRCA 1-2 genes and several other mutations and genetic syndromes have recently been highlighted, although they rarely occur. If a diagnosis is issued before POI onset, counseling on currently available fertility preservation techniques is advisable. In case of spontaneous menarche (this can occur variably depending on the mutation) established techniques like embryo or oocyte cryopreservation can be proposed, even if, in some cases, their effectiveness may be reduced by ovarian alterations connected to the mutation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has recently been defined as an established medical procedure for fertility preservation in young cancer patients and may be an option for prepubertal patients. However, it is still experimental in special populations with genetic diseases causing POI. New innovative experimental techniques, like in vitro maturation of immature oocytes (IVM) and vitro activation (IVA) of immature follicles on ovarian tissue, have shown limited but encouraging data and they will be probably available in the near future. For a correct risk-benefit evaluation, the following aspects should be considered: actual knowledge about the pathology-specific efficacy of the various techniques, the average age of onset of POI, the possible risks associated with the procedure in relation to the underlying pathology, the probability of spontaneous conception, as well as the health implications of a possible future pregnancy.. CONCLUSIONS Fertility preservation techniques represent a crucial opportunity for patients with genetic risk of POI. Early diagnosis increases the chances to apply these techniques. No specific recommendations concerning fertility preservation for each genetic pathology are available, and clinicians should first counsel the patient and her relatives about known risks and benefits of the available techniques, both those established and those considered as experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. .,Clinica Eugin Modena, Modena, Italy.
| | - Elisa Mastellari
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shulman Y, Almog B, Kalma Y, Fouks Y, Azem F, Cohen Y. Effects of letrozole or tamoxifen coadministered with a standard stimulation protocol on fertility preservation among breast cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:743-750. [PMID: 33409757 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-02030-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effects of letrozole or tamoxifen coadministration on fertility preservation treatment outcomes. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 118 breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation treatment between 2008 and 2018. Patients who received letrozole (n = 36) or tamoxifen (n = 30) were compared to controls (n = 52) who underwent standard ovarian stimulation protocols. The primary outcome measures included the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes (MII), fertilization, and top-quality embryo rates. The secondary outcome measures included duration of stimulation, gonadotropin dose and peak estradiol level. RESULTS The number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, fertilization rate, duration of stimulation, or gonadotropin dose were similar in the letrozole and tamoxifen groups, compared to controls. Top-quality embryo rate was lower in the tamoxifen group compared to controls (25% vs 39.4%, respectively, P = 0.034). The abnormal fertilization rate was higher in the letrozole group compared to controls (7.8% vs 3.60%, respectively, P = 0.015). A stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that letrozole and peak estradiol were significantly associated with abnormal fertilization (OR 11.94; 95% CI 2.35-60.4, P = 0.003 for letrozole and OR 1.075; 95% CI 1.024-1.12, P = 0.004 per 100 unit change in estradiol). CONCLUSIONS There may be a negative effect of letrozole or tamoxifen on fertilization and embryo quality, in fertility preservation cycles. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Shulman
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Benny Almog
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yael Kalma
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yuval Fouks
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Foad Azem
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yoni Cohen
- IVF Unit, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 6 Weizmann Street, 6423906, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Qu J, Li Y, Liao S, Yan J. The Effects of Negative Elements in Environment and Cancer on Female Reproductive System. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 1300:283-313. [PMID: 33523439 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-4187-6_13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
With the development of human society, factors that contribute to the impairment of female fertility is accumulating. Lifestyle-related risk factors, occupational risk factors, and iatrogenic factors, including cancer and anti-cancer treatments, have been recognized with their negative effects on the function of female reproductive system. However, the exact influences and their possible mechanism have not been elucidated yet. It is impossible to accurately estimate the indexes of female fertility, but many researchers have put forward that the general fertility has inclined through the past decades. Thus the demand for fertility preservation has increased more and more dramatically. Here we described some of the factors which may influence female reproductive system and methods for fertility preservation in response to female infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiangxue Qu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuehan Li
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shujie Liao
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| | - Jie Yan
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vuković P, Peccatori FA, Massarotti C, Miralles MS, Beketić-Orešković L, Lambertini M. Preimplantation genetic testing for carriers of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103201. [PMID: 33333149 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The detection of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant has relevant implications for the patients and their family members. Family planning, prophylactic surgery and the possibility of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) to avoid transmittance of pathogenic variants to the offspring are relevant topics in this setting. PGT-M is valuable option for BRCA carriers, but it remains a controversial and underdiscussed topic. Although the advances in PGT technologies have improved pregnancy rate, there are still several important challenges associated with its use. The purpose of this review is to report the current evidence on PGT-M for BRCA1/2 carriers, ethical concerns and controversy associated with its use, reproductive implications of BRCA pathogenic variants, underlying areas in which an educational effort would be beneficial as well as possibilities for future research efforts in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Vuković
- Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, 20125, Italy.
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16132, Italy.
| | | | - Lidija Beketić-Orešković
- Division of Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia; Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16132, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, 16126, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anderson RA, Su HI. The Clinical Value and Interpretation of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Women With Cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11:574263. [PMID: 33117288 PMCID: PMC7577190 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.574263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer treatments can be damaging to the ovary, with implications for future fertility and reproductive lifespan. There is therefore a need for a biomarker than can usefully provide an assessment of the ovary and its potential for long-term function after cancer treatment, and ideally also be of value pre-treatment, for the prediction of post-treatment function. In this review we assess the value of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in this context. Measurement of AMH at the time of cancer diagnosis has been shown to be predictive of whether or not there will remain some ovarian function post-treatment in women with breast cancer, in conjunction with age. AMH may however be reduced at the time of diagnosis in some conditions, including lymphoma, but probably not in women with breast cancer unless they are carriers of BRCA1 mutations. Following chemotherapy, AMH is often much reduced compared to pretreatment levels, with recovery dependent on the chemotherapy regimen administered, the woman's age, and her pretreatment AMH. Recent data show there may be a long duration of relative stability of AMH levels over 10 to 15 years prior to decline rather than a rapid decline for many young women after cancer. Post-treatment AMH may have utility in determining that ovarian function will not recover, contributing to assessment of the need for ovarian suppression in women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. AMH measurement provides an index of treatment gonadotoxicity, allowing comparison of different treatment regimens, although extrapolation to effects on fertility requires caution, and there are very limited data regarding the use of AMH to estimate time to menopause in the post-cancer setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A. Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - H. Irene Su
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Knabben L, Siegenthaler F, Imboden S, Mueller MD. Fertility in BRCA mutation carriers: counseling BRCA-mutated patients on reproductive issues. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2020; 43:171-177. [PMID: 33027047 DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2020-0005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Genetic testing rates for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have steadily increased during the past decades resulting in a growing population of young and healthy mutation carriers. Available data on fertility issues in BRCA mutation carriers is rising but the results remain to some extent still conflicting. We have performed a systematic literature review in order to get an overview concerning the current evidence on fertility issues in BRCA mutation carriers. Data were analyzed critically with the aim to deliver physicians a solid basis for (onco) fertility counseling in women with BRCA mutations. Content We present the latest data on cancer risks in women with HBOC and analyze the influence of cancer treatment and preventive surgery on the reproductive potential. Epidemiological studies on fertility issues in BRCA mutation carriers showed heterogeneous results. However, several authors showed a decreased ovarian reserve with lower Anti-Müllerien hormone (AMH) levels and poorer response to ovarian stimulation in BRCA positive women. The diagnosis of BRCA mutations influences reproductive decision-making. Additionally, the shortened reproductive window and the need to complete family planning early has a significant psychological impact. Summary and Outlook This article highlights the importance of fertility counseling in BRCA mutation carriers. Individual fertility counseling is mandatory. Fertility preservation strategies should be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Knabben
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Siegenthaler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Sara Imboden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Michael D Mueller
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Berne and University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Turan V, Oktay K. BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA double-strand break repair and ovarian aging. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 26:43-57. [PMID: 31822904 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmz043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Revised: 10/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oocyte aging has significant clinical consequences, and yet no treatment exists to address the age-related decline in oocyte quality. The lack of progress in the treatment of oocyte aging is due to the fact that the underlying molecular mechanisms are not sufficiently understood. BRCA1 and 2 are involved in homologous DNA recombination and play essential roles in ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-mediated DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair. A growing body of laboratory, translational and clinical evidence has emerged within the past decade indicating a role for BRCA function and ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair in ovarian aging. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE Although there are several competing or complementary theories, given the growing evidence tying BRCA function and ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair mechanisms in general to ovarian aging, we performed this review encompassing basic, translational and clinical work to assess the current state of knowledge on the topic. A clear understanding of the mechanisms underlying oocyte aging may result in targeted treatments to preserve ovarian reserve and improve oocyte quality. SEARCH METHODS We searched for published articles in the PubMed database containing key words, BRCA, BRCA1, BRCA2, Mutations, Fertility, Ovarian Reserve, Infertility, Mechanisms of Ovarian Aging, Oocyte or Oocyte DNA Repair, in the English-language literature until May 2019. We did not include abstracts or conference proceedings, with the exception of our own. OUTCOMES Laboratory studies provided robust and reproducible evidence that BRCA1 function and ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair, in general, weakens with age in oocytes of multiple species including human. In both women with BRCA mutations and BRCA-mutant mice, primordial follicle numbers are reduced and there is accelerated accumulation of DNA DSBs in oocytes. In general, women with BRCA1 mutations have lower ovarian reserves and experience earlier menopause. Laboratory evidence also supports critical role for BRCA1 and other ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair pathway members in meiotic function. When laboratory, translational and clinical evidence is considered together, BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA DSB repair function emerges as a likely regulator of ovarian aging. Moreover, DNA damage and repair appear to be key features in chemotherapy-induced ovarian aging. WIDER IMPLICATIONS The existing data suggest that the BRCA-related ATM-mediated DNA repair pathway is a strong candidate to be a regulator of oocyte aging, and the age-related decline of this pathway likely impairs oocyte health. This knowledge may create an opportunity to develop targeted treatments to reverse or prevent physiological or chemotherapy-induced oocyte aging. On the immediate practical side, women with BRCA or similar mutations may need to be specially counselled for fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan Turan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uskudar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kutluk Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Merlino L, Chiné A, Galli C, Piccioni MG. BRCA1/2 genes mutations, ovarian reserve and female reproductive outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 72:339-348. [PMID: 32744451 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.20.04624-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations seems to impact female fertility, in addition to increasing the risk of ovarian and breast cancer. Several studies had investigated this issue but data available are still controversial. In order to clarify the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in female fertility and ovarian function we carried out a systematic review of the literature with the aim to establish a possible management's strategy of these patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A review of current literature regarding BRCA mutation (BRCAm) and fertility was conducted using the PubMed tool to select remarkable articles with the keywords "BRCA1/2 gene," "BRCA1/2 mutation," "anti-Müllerian hormone," "female fertility," "ovarian reserve" and "premature ovarian failure." EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In current literature there are controversial findings about the relation between BRCA genes mutations and lifespan of female reproductive age. Several studies showed an higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency of BRCAs mutations carriers, according to lower serum AMH level, primordial follicle count, or fewer oocyte yield after ovarian stimulation; on the other hand more recent studies reported not significant differences in serum AMH level or in reproductive outcomes between mutated and non-mutated BRCA patients. For this reason, currently there is not a strict recommendation for routine evaluation of fertility in female carriers of BRCA mutations. Nevertheless, the strong advice to complete childbearing by age 40 and then to undergo a risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and the increased risk of infertility as a result of anticancer treatment in breast cancer BRCAm patients, make the issue of fertility and pregnancy planning in these women worthy of consideration. CONCLUSIONS A dedicated counseling to discuss these issues, eventually associated with a personalized assessment of serum AMH or antral follicle count in order to have a panoramic view of ovarian reserve, may be useful in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Merlino
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy -
| | - Alessandra Chiné
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Galli
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria G Piccioni
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lorzadeh N, Kazemirad N, Kazemirad Y. Human immunodeficiency: Extragonadal comorbidities of infertility in women. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE 2020; 8:447-457. [PMID: 32621331 PMCID: PMC7416027 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Infertility is mediated by several changes system‐wide. These changes are likely to cause other systems‐related pathologies, such as changes in systemic immune response, particularly inflammatory response can lead to cardiovascular diseases and breast cancer. Methods These morbidities can exist immediately or years after the diagnosis of infertility. Therefore, understanding the mechanism is important to move toward therapeutic interventions. Results Several extragonadal pathologies are reported due to infertility, as well as, how these might also contribute to reproductive disabilities. Detailed evidence are still not present that can give stronger result. Conclusion This review highlights some of the most frequent comorbidities that are seen in infertile women, hence requiring a need for complete clinical screening and care, as well as diagnosis and treatment in early stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahid Lorzadeh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Nastaran Kazemirad
- Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hu KL, Wang S, Ye X, Zhang D. Effects of BRCA gene mutation on female reproductive potential: A systematic review. Maturitas 2020; 137:11-17. [PMID: 32498931 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Mutation of BRCA genes significantly increases the lifetime risk of breast, ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers. In addition to the increased risk of these multiple malignancies, the recent literature suggests that mutations in BRCA genes may lead to decreased reproductive potential. In this systematic review, we focus on the effect of BRCA gene mutation on reproductive potential. The main outcomes included the rate of nulliparity, ovarian reserve, ovarian response, and the age at natural menopause. A total of 23 observational studies were included for quality analysis. The certainty of evidence was low to moderate: the main limitations were imprecision and statistically significant heterogeneity. Meta-analysis suggested that the rate of nulliparity, serum anti-müllerian hormone levels, antral follicle counts and ovarian response were not significantly affected in BRCA gene mutation carriers (P > 0.05). BRCA gene mutation carriers tended to have a lower number of primordial follicles (P = 0.0002) and lower age at natural menopause than non-carriers. In conclusion, there is no compelling evidence indicating that the rate of nulliparity, serum AMH, antral follicle counts and ovarian response are affected in BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Lun Hu
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| | - Siwen Wang
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| | - Xiaohang Ye
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| | - Dan Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Oktay KH, Bedoschi G, Goldfarb SB, Taylan E, Titus S, Palomaki GE, Cigler T, Robson M, Dickler MN. Increased chemotherapy-induced ovarian reserve loss in women with germline BRCA mutations due to oocyte deoxyribonucleic acid double strand break repair deficiency. Fertil Steril 2020; 113:1251-1260.e1. [PMID: 32331767 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether woman who have BRCA mutations (WBM) experience more declines in ovarian reserve after chemotherapy treatment, as it induces oocyte death by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, and BRCA mutations result in DNA damage repair deficiency. DESIGN Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING Academic centers. PATIENT(S) The 108 evaluable women with breast cancer were stratified into those never tested (negative family history; n = 35) and those negative (n = 59) or positive (n = 14) for a pathogenic BRCA mutation. INTERVENTION(S) Sera were longitudinally obtained before and 12-24 months after chemotherapy treatment, assayed for antimüllerian hormone (AMH), and adjusted for age at sample collection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Ovarian recovery, defined as the geometric mean of the after chemotherapy age-adjusted AMH levels compared with baseline levels. RESULT(S) Compared with the controls, the before chemotherapy treatment AMH levels were 24% and 34% lower in those negative or positive for BRCA mutations, consistent with accelerated ovarian aging in WBM. The WBM had a threefold difference in AMH recovery after chemotherapy treatment (1.6%), when compared with BRCA negative (3.7%) and untested/low risk controls (5.2%). Limiting the analysis to the most common regimen, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, showed similar results. These findings were mechanistically confirmed in an in vitro mouse oocyte BRCA knockdown bioassay, which showed that BRCA deficiency results in increased oocyte susceptibility to doxorubicin. CONCLUSION(S) Women who have pathogenic BRCA mutations are more likely to lose ovarian reserve after chemotherapy treatment, suggesting an emphasis on fertility preservation. Furthermore, our findings generate the hypothesis that DNA repair deficiency is a shared mechanism between aging, infertility, and cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00823654.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kutluk H Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Giuliano Bedoschi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Enes Taylan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Shiny Titus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Glenn E Palomaki
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Women & Infants Hospital and Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Tessa Cigler
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Mark Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Cordeiro Mitchell CN, McGuinness B, Fine E, Kearns WG, Christianson MS, Segars J, Pastore LM. Navigating the body of literature assessing BRCA1/2 mutations and markers of ovarian function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:1037-1055. [PMID: 32212026 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01745-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Twelve percent of women in the USA will develop invasive breast cancer in their lifetime, and that risk increases to 80% if they carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. BRCA1/2 mutations are thought to potentially affect ovarian reserve and/or fertility. METHODS PubMed and PubMed Central were searched for publications on ovarian reserve-related outcomes (i.e., AMH and response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocols) that were reported in relation to BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations from 1950 through May 2019. A meta-analysis was conducted to create forest plots and summary effect measures using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS This article reviews the 16 qualifying publications. There were several fundamental methodological differences in the study designs and outcome details reported in AMH studies. Summary statistics found no difference in AMH levels between BRCA1/2+ women as compared with controls (Z overall test effects p ≥ 0.45). Regarding responses to COH, there were overall non-significantly fewer total and mature numbers of oocytes retrieved in BRCA1/2+ cases as compared with controls (meta-analysis Z overall test effects p ≥ 0.40). CONCLUSIONS While the summary measures indicate no significant differences in AMH levels between BRCA1/2+ cases and controls, readers should be aware that there are significant methodological differences in the AMH reports. Additionally, the response to COH protocols does not seem to be significantly lower in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the existing literature. Continued research on both of these clinical parameters would be beneficial for patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina N Cordeiro Mitchell
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | | | - Eliana Fine
- School of Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - William G Kearns
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.,AdvaGenix, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Mindy S Christianson
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - James Segars
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lisa M Pastore
- OB/GYN and Reproductive Medicine Department, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sella T, Partridge AH. Fertility Counseling and Preservation in Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-019-00348-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
42
|
Ferreiro E, de Uralde BL, Abreu R, García-Velasco JA, Muñoz E. Aromatase Inhibitors for Ovarian Stimulation in Patients with Breast Cancer. Curr Drug Targets 2020; 21:910-921. [PMID: 32077823 DOI: 10.2174/1389450121666200220124607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 02/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common malignancy diagnosed in women, and its treatment has a high probability of loss of fertility. Oocyte vitrification is the most commonly used technique to preserve fertility before starting oncological treatment. Aromatase inhibitors induce hypoestrogenemia while promoting the release of gonadotropins and constitute an alternative drug for ovarian stimulation in patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE In this mini-review, we update and describe the current status of aromatase inhibitor use in controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification in patients with breast cancer. RESULTS Aromatase inhibitors are commonly used in combination with gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation in patients with breast cancer who preserve their fertility through oocyte vitrification. They achieve similar ovarian responses as conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in regards to the number of oocytes, and no additional complications after their use have been reported. Furthermore, aromatase inhibitors seem to be safe not only for offspring, as no more congenital defects occur in newborns from pregnancies achieved after their use, but also for the patients, as no more malignancy recurrence or increased mortality was found in cohort studies. CONCLUSION Aromatase inhibitors are elective drugs for ovarian stimulation in patients with breast cancer who decide to preserve their fertility through oocyte vitrification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esteban Ferreiro
- IVIRMA Vigo, Plaza Francisco Fernandez del Riego, 7 36203, Vigo Pontevedra, Spain
| | | | - Rita Abreu
- IVIRMA Vigo, Plaza Francisco Fernandez del Riego, 7 36203, Vigo Pontevedra, Spain
| | | | - Elkin Muñoz
- IVIRMA Vigo, Plaza Francisco Fernandez del Riego, 7 36203, Vigo Pontevedra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang X, Niu J, Che T, Zhu Y, Zhang H, Qu J. Fertility preservation in BRCA mutation carriers-efficacy and safety issues: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2020; 18:11. [PMID: 32070378 PMCID: PMC7027288 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-019-0561-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BRCA mutation carriers face various situations that influence their fertility potential. There is still a lack of guideline or expert consensus on Fertility Preservation (FP) in BRCA mutation carriers and the necessity and safety of FP in BRCA mutation carriers is still in dispute. This review aims to focus on the population of BRCA mutation carriers by analyzing the existing FP strategies, comprehensively comparing the pros and cons of each strategy and its applicability.FP is a suggestion for BRCA mutation carriers with birth planning. Different FP strategies have different characteristics. Considering the particularity of BRCA mutation carriers, multiple factors need to be carefully considered. This review focuses on the applicability of each FP method for carriers under various circumstances. Available FP strategies including oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, and egg/embryo donation are analyzed by comparing existing methods comprehensively. In the attempt to provide an up-to-date decision-making guidance. Conditions taking into consideration were the carrier's age, the risk of breast and ovarian metastasis, plans for oncotherapy, FP outcome, time available for FP intervention and accessibility.Overall, FP is necessary and safe for BRCA mutation carriers. Among all available FP methods, oocyte cryopreservation is the most reliable procedure; ovarian tissue cryopreservation is the only way for preserving both fertility and endocrine function, recommended for pre-pubertal carriers and when time is limited for oocyte stimulation. A clear framework provides frontline clinical practitioners a new thought and eventually benefit thousands of BRCA mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofu Zhang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Jingxin Niu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Tuanjie Che
- Laboratory of Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Suzhou Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Science and Technology Town Hospital, Suzhou, 215153, China
| | - Yibei Zhu
- Department of Immunology, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China
| | - Hongtao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China
| | - Jing Qu
- Department of Cell Biology, Medical College of Soochow University, Ren Ai Road 199, Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, 215123, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fertility preservation and preimplantation genetic assessment for women with breast cancer. Cryobiology 2020; 92:1-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
45
|
Mavaddat N, Antoniou AC, Mooij TM, Hooning MJ, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Noguès C, Gauthier-Villars M, Caron O, Gesta P, Pujol P, Lortholary A, Barrowdale D, Frost D, Evans DG, Izatt L, Adlard J, Eeles R, Brewer C, Tischkowitz M, Henderson A, Cook J, Eccles D, van Engelen K, Mourits MJE, Ausems MGEM, Koppert LB, Hopper JL, John EM, Chung WK, Andrulis IL, Daly MB, Buys SS, kConFab Investigators, Benitez J, Caldes T, Jakubowska A, Simard J, Singer CF, Tan Y, Olah E, Navratilova M, Foretova L, Gerdes AM, Roos-Blom MJ, Van Leeuwen FE, Arver B, Olsson H, Schmutzler RK, Engel C, Kast K, Phillips KA, Terry MB, Milne RL, Goldgar DE, Rookus MA, Andrieu N, Easton DF, on behalf of IBCCS, kConFab, BCFR. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, natural menopause, and breast cancer risk: an international prospective cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 2020; 22:8. [PMID: 31948486 PMCID: PMC6966793 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-020-1247-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) on breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers is uncertain. Retrospective analyses have suggested a protective effect but may be substantially biased. Prospective studies have had limited power, particularly for BRCA2 mutation carriers. Further, previous studies have not considered the effect of RRSO in the context of natural menopause. METHODS A multi-centre prospective cohort of 2272 BRCA1 and 1605 BRCA2 mutation carriers was followed for a mean of 5.4 and 4.9 years, respectively; 426 women developed incident breast cancer. RRSO was modelled as a time-dependent covariate in Cox regression, and its effect assessed in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. RESULTS There was no association between RRSO and breast cancer for BRCA1 (HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.94-1.61) or BRCA2 (HR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.62-1.24) mutation carriers. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, HRs were 0.68 (95% CI 0.40-1.15) and 1.07 (95% CI 0.69-1.64) for RRSO carried out before or after age 45 years, respectively. The HR for BRCA2 mutation carriers decreased with increasing time since RRSO (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.99 for 5 years or longer after RRSO). Estimates for premenopausal women were similar. CONCLUSION We found no evidence that RRSO reduces breast cancer risk for BRCA1 mutation carriers. A potentially beneficial effect for BRCA2 mutation carriers was observed, particularly after 5 years following RRSO. These results may inform counselling and management of carriers with respect to RRSO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasim Mavaddat
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| | - Thea M. Mooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Center Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Catherine Noguès
- DASC, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Olivier Caron
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy Hôpital Universitaire, Villejuif, France
| | - Paul Gesta
- Centre Hospitalier, Service Régional d’Oncologie Génétique Poitou-Charentes, Niort, France
| | - Pascal Pujol
- Unité d’Oncogénétique, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
| | - Alain Lortholary
- Centre Catherine de Sienne, Service d’Oncologie Médicale, Nantes, France
| | - Daniel Barrowdale
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester University, Central Manchester, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Julian Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ros Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Carole Brewer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alex Henderson
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Centre for Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Diana Eccles
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marian J. E. Mourits
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Linetta B. Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
| | - Esther M. John
- Department of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Wendy K. Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Mary B. Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | - Saundra S. Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - kConFab Investigators
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Javier Benitez
- Human Genetics Group and Genotyping Unit, CEGEN, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - Trinidad Caldes
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, CIBERONC (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec Canada
| | - Christian F. Singer
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Yen Tan
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marie Navratilova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie-José Roos-Blom
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E. Van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brita Arver
- The Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Håkan Olsson
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Karin Kast
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett St, East Melbourne, Victoria 8006 Australia
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Australia
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, SOM 4B454, Salt Lake City, UT 841232 USA
| | - Matti A. Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines Paris Tech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| | - on behalf of IBCCS
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Center Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- DASC, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy Hôpital Universitaire, Villejuif, France
- Centre Hospitalier, Service Régional d’Oncologie Génétique Poitou-Charentes, Niort, France
- Unité d’Oncogénétique, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
- Centre Catherine de Sienne, Service d’Oncologie Médicale, Nantes, France
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester University, Central Manchester, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Centre for Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Coordinating Center: Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
- Department of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA USA
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Human Genetics Group and Genotyping Unit, CEGEN, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, CIBERONC (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec Canada
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett St, East Melbourne, Victoria 8006 Australia
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Australia
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, SOM 4B454, Salt Lake City, UT 841232 USA
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines Paris Tech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| | - kConFab
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Center Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- DASC, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy Hôpital Universitaire, Villejuif, France
- Centre Hospitalier, Service Régional d’Oncologie Génétique Poitou-Charentes, Niort, France
- Unité d’Oncogénétique, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
- Centre Catherine de Sienne, Service d’Oncologie Médicale, Nantes, France
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester University, Central Manchester, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Centre for Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Coordinating Center: Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
- Department of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA USA
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Human Genetics Group and Genotyping Unit, CEGEN, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, CIBERONC (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec Canada
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett St, East Melbourne, Victoria 8006 Australia
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Australia
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, SOM 4B454, Salt Lake City, UT 841232 USA
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines Paris Tech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| | - BCFR
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, P.O. Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Family Center Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- DASC, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
- Institut Curie, Service de Génétique, Paris, France
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy Hôpital Universitaire, Villejuif, France
- Centre Hospitalier, Service Régional d’Oncologie Génétique Poitou-Charentes, Niort, France
- Unité d’Oncogénétique, CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
- Centre Catherine de Sienne, Service d’Oncologie Médicale, Nantes, France
- Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester University, Central Manchester, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Clinical Genetics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Oncogenetics Team, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Centre for Life, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK
- University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
- The Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands (HEBON), Coordinating Center: Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010 Australia
- Department of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY USA
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario Canada
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA USA
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT USA
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Human Genetics Group and Genotyping Unit, CEGEN, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC, CIBERONC (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Unii Lubelskiej 1, Szczecin, Poland
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval Research Center, 2705 Laurier Boulevard, Quebec City, Quebec Canada
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, 65653 Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Medical Oncology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag 1, A’Beckett St, East Melbourne, Victoria 8006 Australia
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, NY USA
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria Australia
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, SOM 4B454, Salt Lake City, UT 841232 USA
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines Paris Tech, Fontainebleau, France
- PSL Research University, Paris, France
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CBI 8RN UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Maidarti M, Anderson RA, Telfer EE. Crosstalk between PTEN/PI3K/Akt Signalling and DNA Damage in the Oocyte: Implications for Primordial Follicle Activation, Oocyte Quality and Ageing. Cells 2020; 9:200. [PMID: 31947601 PMCID: PMC7016612 DOI: 10.3390/cells9010200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The preservation of genome integrity in the mammalian female germline from primordial follicle arrest to activation of growth to oocyte maturation is fundamental to ensure reproductive success. As oocytes are formed before birth and may remain dormant for many years, it is essential that defence mechanisms are monitored and well maintained. The phosphatase and tensin homolog of chromosome 10 (PTEN)/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PKB, Akt) is a major signalling pathway governing primordial follicle recruitment and growth. This pathway also contributes to cell growth, survival and metabolism, and to the maintenance of genomic integrity. Accelerated primordial follicle activation through this pathway may result in a compromised DNA damage response (DDR). Additionally, the distinct DDR mechanisms in oocytes may become less efficient with ageing. This review considers DNA damage surveillance mechanisms and their links to the PTEN/PI3K/Akt signalling pathway, impacting on the DDR during growth activation of primordial follicles, and in ovarian ageing. Targeting DDR mechanisms within oocytes may be of value in developing techniques to protect ovaries against chemotherapy and in advancing clinical approaches to regulate primordial follicle activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mila Maidarti
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK; (M.M.); (R.A.A.)
- Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
| | - Richard A. Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, UK; (M.M.); (R.A.A.)
| | - Evelyn E. Telfer
- Institute of Cell Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ponce J, Fernandez-Gonzalez S, Calvo I, Climent M, Peñafiel J, Feliubadaló L, Teulé A, Lázaro C, Brunet JM, Candás-Estébanez B, Durán Retamal M. Assessment of ovarian reserve and reproductive outcomes in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:83-88. [PMID: 31780568 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The clinical impact on fertility in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess ovarian reserve as measured by anti-mullerian hormone levels in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, as well as to investigate the impact of anti-mullerian hormone levels on reproductive outcomes. METHODS The study involved a cohort of women who tested positive for BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening or were tested for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 family mutation. Blood samples were collected for anti-mullerian hormone analysis and the reproductive outcomes were analyzed after a mean follow-up of 9 years. Participants were classified into BRCA mutation-positive versus BRCA mutation-negative. Controls were healthy relatives who tested negative for the family mutation. All patients were contacted by telephone to collect data on reproductive outcomes. Linear regression was used to predict anti-mullerian hormone levels by BRCA status adjusted for a polynomial form of age. RESULTS Results of anti-mullerian hormone analysis and reproductive outcomes were available for 135 women (BRCA mutation-negative, n=66; BRCA1 mutation-positive, n=32; BRCA2 mutation-positive, n=37). Anti-mullerian hormone curves according to BRCA status and adjusted by age showed that BRCA2 mutation-positive patients have lower levels of anti-mullerian hormone as compared with BRCA-negative and BRCA1 mutation-positive. Among the women who tried to conceive, infertility was observed in 18.7% of BRCA mutation-negative women, in 22.2% of BRCA1 mutation-positive women, and in 30.8% of BRCA2 mutation-positive women (p=0.499). In the multivariable analysis, there were no factors independently associated with infertility. DISCUSSION BRCA2 mutation-positive carriers showed more diminished anti-mullerian hormone levels than BRCA1 mutation-positive and BRCA mutation-negative women. However, these differences do not appear to have a negative impact on reproductive outcome. This is important to consider at the time of reproductive counseling in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Ponce
- Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Iris Calvo
- Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maite Climent
- Gynecology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judith Peñafiel
- Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alex Teulé
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Maria Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBGI, Girona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Candás-Estébanez
- Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes in young women with breast cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 37:709-715. [PMID: 31872386 PMCID: PMC7125060 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01658-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcome. The main purpose and research question of the study is to determine the impact of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on ovarian reserve and fertility preservation outcomes. Methods Prospective study: 67 breast cancer patients between 18 and 40 years old, undergoing a fertility preservation by means of oocyte storage were considered. Inclusions criteria for the study were age between 18 and 40 years old, BMI between 18 and 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage I and II according to American Joint Committee on Cancer classification (2017) and no metastasis. Exclusion criteria: age over 40 years old, BMI < 18 and > 28, breast cancer neoplasm stage III and IV and do not performed the BRCA test. A total of 21 patients had not performed the test and were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups: Group A was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 1 mutations, Group B was composed by 11 breast cancer patients with BRCA 2 mutations, Group C was composed by 24 women with breast cancer without BRCA mutations, and Group D (control) was composed by 181 normal women. Results Group A showed significant lower AMH levels compared to Group C and D (1.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.5 ± 4.1 p < 0.05 and 1.2 ± 1.1 vs 3.8 ± 2.5 p < 0.05). BRCA1 mutated patients showed a significant lower rate of mature oocytes (MII) compared to Group C (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.2 ± 4.4 p < 0,05) and Group D (3.1 ± 2.3 vs 7.3 ± 3.4; p < 0,05). Breast cancer patients needed a higher dose of gonadotropins compared to controls (Group A 2206 ± 1392 Group B2047.5 ± 829.9 Group C 2106 ± 1336 Group D 1597 ± 709 p < 0,05). No significant differences were found among the groups considering basal FSH levels, duration of stimulation, number of developed follicles, and number of total retrieved oocytes. Regarding BRCA2 mutation, no effect on fertility was shown in this study. Conclusions The study showed that BRCA1 patients had a higher risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) confirmed by a diminished ovarian reserve and a lower number of mature oocytes suitable for cryopreservation.
Collapse
|
49
|
The potential impact of tumor suppressor genes on human gametogenesis: a case-control study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 37:341-346. [PMID: 31792669 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01634-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the incidence of tumor suppressor gene (TSG) mutations in men and women with impaired gametogenesis. METHODS Gene association analyses were performed on blood samples in two distinct patient populations: males with idiopathic male infertility and females with unexplained diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). The male study group consisted of men with idiopathic azoospermia, oligozoospermia, asthenozoospermia, or teratozoospermia. Age-matched controls were men with normal semen analyses. The female study group consisted of women with unexplained DOR with anti-Müllerian hormone levels ≤ 1.1 ng/mL. Controls were age-matched women with normal ovarian reserve (> 1.1 ng/mL). RESULTS Fifty-seven male cases (mean age = 38.4; mean sperm count = 15.7 ± 12.1; mean motility = 38.2 ± 24.7) and 37 age-matched controls (mean age = 38.0; mean sperm count = 89.6 ± 37.5; mean motility = 56.2 ± 14.3) were compared. Variants observed in CHD5 were found to be enriched in the study group (p = 0.000107). The incidence of CHD5 mutation c.*3198_*3199insT in the 3'UTR (rs538186680) was significantly higher in cases compared to controls (p = 0.0255). 72 DOR cases (mean age = 38.7; mean AMH = 0.5 ± 0.3; mean FSH = 11.7 ± 12.5) and 48 age-matched controls (mean age = 37.6; mean AMH = 4.1 ± 3.0; mean FSH = 7.1 ± 2.2) were compared. Mutations in CHD5 (c.-140A>C), RB1 (c.1422-18delT, rs70651121), and TP53 (c.376-161A>G, rs75821853) were found at significantly higher frequencies in DOR cases compared to controls (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, 363 variants detected in the DOR patients were not present in the control group. CONCLUSION Unexplained impaired gametogenesis in both males and females may be associated with genetic variation in TSGs. TSGs, which play cardinal roles in cell-cycle control, might also be critical for normal spermatogenesis and oogenesis. If validated in larger prospective studies, it is possible that TSGs provide an etiological basis for some patients with impaired gametogenesis.
Collapse
|
50
|
Reproductive and Hormonal Considerations in Women at Increased Risk for Hereditary Gynecologic Cancers: Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine Evidence-Based Review. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:508-514. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|