Risk of Tuberculosis and Hepatitis B Reactivation in Patients With Crohn's Disease on Ustekinumab: A Nationwide Real-World Study

Prevalence of opportunistic infections in Syrian inflammatory bowel disease patients on biologic therapy: a multi-center retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cytomegalovirus (CMV), and tuberculosis (TB) pose significant risks to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving biological therapy. However, data on the prevalence of these infections in Syria are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of IBD patients receiving biologic therapy at Damascus Hospital and Ibn Al-Nafees Hospital, two major public institutions in Syria, between January 2021 and November 2024. A minimum sample size of 130 was estimated; however, all available records were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 185 IBD patients (104 from Damascus and 81 from Ibn Al-Nafees), 51.4% had ulcerative colitis and 47.6% had Crohn's disease. The smoking prevalence was 9.2%, which was higher in Crohn's disease (5.9%) than in ulcerative colitis (3.2%). TST performed in 61.1% of patients, with 4.3% positivity, and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) in 8.7% (1.1% positive). Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBc antibodies were found in 2.7% and 5.4% of the patients, respectively, while hepatitis C seroprevalence was low (0.5%). CMV seropositivity was high in Damascus (50.8%), with two cases (1.1%) of CMV colitis. Biologic therapies included infliximab (42.7%), ustekinumab (24.3%), golimumab (10.8%), and adalimumab (6.5%). Data gaps, particularly in viral serology and TB screening, are notable.

CONCLUSION

This study identifies deficiencies in TB/hepatitis B screening (notably anti-HBs Ab) and elevated CMV seroprevalence among Syrian IBD patients receiving biologics, extending to immunosuppressed cohorts (rheumatology, dermatology, oncology). Insufficient screening heightens occult infection/reactivation risks, necessitating standardized pretreatment protocols to reduce morbidity in high-risk populations.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Hepatitis B reactivation in PsA patients: an SLR and meta-analysis for IL-17, IL-23 and JAK inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

HBV reactivation (HBVr) constitutes a side effect of the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Even though HBVr risk of conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents has long been established, the risk of targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs and anti-interleukin (anti-IL) agents remains largely unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a SLR (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE) and meta-analysis to examine the HBVr risk for the following: anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and JAK-inhibitors in patients with chronic HBV infection (HBsAg presence or detectable HBV-DNA) and in patients with prior HBV infection (HBcAb-positive and HBsAg-negative). Meta-analysis was performed using both the fixed and random effects method and was conducted using the R computing language.

RESULTS

Overall, our study revealed a low HBVr risk of <6% in all agents; the risk was significantly higher for people having chronic compared with those with resolved HBV (14.4% vs 5.1%, respectively P < 0.01). There was no difference among different drugs in the HBVr rates [anti-IL-17: 4% (95% CI: 1-9%), anti-IL-12/IL-23: 2% (95% CI: 0-5%), JAK-inhibitors: 4% (95% CI: 1-8%), anti-IL23: 0%]. Of note, HBVr rate reached 28% in patients with chronic HBV who did not receive anti-viral treatment. For patients with resolved hepatitis, the respective percentage was 4.7%.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our meta-analysis shows that patients with chronic HBV receiving anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and JAK-inhibitors have significant risk for HBVr, especially if they are not under anti-viral treatment. In contrast, resolved HBV seems to offer minor risk for HBVr even without anti-viral treatment.

Assessment and management for latent tuberculosis before advanced therapies for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A comprehensive review

Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis , is the most significant infectious cause of mortality across the globe. While TB disease can prey on immunocompetent individuals, it is more likely to occur in immunocompromised individuals. Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are a group of diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, autoimmune blistering diseases, and others) where there may be a need for systemic immunosuppression to control the disease manifestations, treat symptoms and improve long term outcomes. Immunosuppression may predispose them to active TB either from recent infection or reactivation of Latent TB (LTB). The major determinants of reactivation include the type of therapy (highest risk with TNF inhibitors and JAK inhibitors) and the underlying TB endemicity. The strategy to avoid TB reactivation includes the detection of LTB using tests that detect immunoreactivity to TB antigens (interferon-gamma release assays or tuberculin skin test) and treating LTB before or with initiation of IMID therapies. Available diagnostic tests have deficiencies in diagnostic sensitivity to detect LTB and even worse capability in predicting reactivation of TB. In addition to immunological tests, more stringent testing strategy utilizing one or many LTB equivalents may point towards subclinical TB. LTB equivalents include clinical (past history of TB, recent exposure to TB) and radiological criteria (use of chest roentgenogram, computed tomography, or, sometimes positron emission tomography - computed tomography). The present review summarizes the risk factors for TB reactivation in patients initiated on advanced therapies, geographically appropriate strategies for LTB testing, and treatment of LTB.

The incidence of hepatitis B reactivation in patients receiving ustekinumab: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis will evaluate the risk of hepatitis B reactivation in patients treated with ustekinumab for inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis. We aim to determine the true incidence of this adverse event, reconcile discrepancies in reported reactivation rates, and elucidate the associated risk.

METHODS

We conducted a rigorous systematic review adhering to established guidelines. Major databases like MEDLINE, Google Scholar, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched. Studies involving patients with documented hepatitis B infection undergoing ustekinumab therapy were included. Patients receiving concurrent antiviral medications were excluded. To account for potential underreporting, studies without reactivation events or with sample sizes ≥3 were also considered by using generalized linear mixed models and Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. This review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023418130).

RESULTS

We analyzed data from nine studies involving 104 hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients. The pooled HBV reactivation (HBVr) incidence among hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients was 10% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-31%], with low heterogeneity (I2 = 7.13%, τ2 = 0.4) and a nonsignificant Q-statistic (Q = 5.38, P = 0.37). For the occult HBV-infected patients, the pooled HBVr incidence was 3% (95% CI: 0-11%), with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, τ2 = 0.0) and a nonsignificant Q-statistic (Q = 2.7, P = 0.61). The reactivation rates showed high consistency across studies, with no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While our data suggest lower HBVr risk with ustekinumab, confirmation is needed due to limited sample size and retrospective design.

Ustekinumab for treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis in an elderly patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Refractory ulcerative colitis is clinically irresponsive or intolerant to multiple drugs, with recurrent episodes and difficulties in treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient in this case was diagnosed with ulcerative colitis due to repeated bloody stools for 4 mo after hemorrhoid surgery. After multiple drug treatment failures, the off-label treatment with ustekinumab was effective, and the patient's condition was under control.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis and treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis should not be limited to the indications of existing drugs. Integrating domestic and foreign medical experiences and guidelines can broaden the diagnosis and treatment approach and bring benefits to such patients.