Effectiveness and Safety Profile of Budesonide Maintenance in Microscopic Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes of Budesonide as a Treatment Option for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Colitis in Patients with Cancer

BACKGROUND

Current treatment guidelines for moderate to severe colitis (IMC) secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) recommend systemic corticosteroids as the primary therapy in conjunction with biologics, namely infliximab and/or vedolizumab. We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of oral budesonide in the treatment of IMC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis at MD Anderson Cancer Center of adult cancer patients with a confirmed (based on clinical, radiographic and laboratory assessment) diagnosis of IMC between 1 January 2015 and 31 November 2022, treated with budesonide. Data collection included demographics, oncologic history, IMC-related information and outcomes up to 6 months after the last dose of ICI.

RESULTS

Our sample (n = 69) comprised primarily of Caucasian (76.8%) females (55.1%). The majority of patients received combination therapy with anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4 (49.3%), and the most common malignancy treated was melanoma (37.6%). The median grade of diarrhea was 3 and of colitis was 2. Of the 50 patients who underwent endoscopic evaluation, a majority had non-ulcerative inflammation (64%) and active colitis on histology (78%). Budesonide was used as primary treatment at onset of IMC in 56.5% patients, as well as a bridging therapy from systemic corticosteroids in 33.3%. Less than half of the patients (44.9%) required additional therapies such as biologics or fecal microbiota transplant. Additionally, 75.3% of patients achieved full remission of IMC and 24.6% had a recurrence of IMC. ICI was resumed in 31.9% of patients and 17.4% received other forms of cancer therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide may be an effective strategy to treat and prevent the recurrence of IMC. The remission rates observed in our analysis with budesonide alone are comparable to systemic corticosteroids. Patients that require an extended duration of steroid exposure and those with moderate to severe colitis may benefit from budesonide given its lower risk of infection and complications. Furthermore, we observe that budesonide may serve as a successful bridge from systemic corticosteroids with subsequent biologic treatment. Larger prospective studies are necessary to determine the role of budesonide as well as its safety profile.

The association between drugs and repeated treatment with budesonide in patients with microscopic colitis: a retrospective observational study

Background

Smoking and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and statins have been associated with microscopic colitis (MC).

Objectives

We investigated whether these factors were associated with repeated budesonide treatments in patients diagnosed with MC.

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Methods

All patients with a histologically verified diagnosis of MC at our clinic between the years 2006 and 2022 were identified. Baseline factors and drugs prescribed before and after diagnosis were registered. The influence of risk factors on the odds of having a prescription of oral budesonide and the odds of having a second course of budesonide was studied.

Results

Patients with MC (n = 183) with a mean age of 62.3 years [standard deviation (SD): 13.3 years] were followed for a median of 5 years (25th-75th percentile 4-10 years) after diagnosis. In all, 138 patients (75%) had at least one prescription of budesonide after diagnosis, and 90 patients (49%) had at least one clinical relapse treated with budesonide. Patients who had been prescribed NSAIDs within 1 year before clinical relapse had higher odds for clinical relapse [odds ratio (OR): 3.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-12.9] but there was no increased risk for clinical relapse for the use of ASA (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.39-2.90), PPIs (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.45-2.63), SSRI (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.82-2.44), or statins (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.35-1.99). No association was seen between being a smoker and/or being prescribed NSAID, ASA, PPI, SSRI, and statins at baseline and the odds of having a prescription of oral budesonide within 1 year after diagnosis.

Conclusion

The risk of being prescribed a second course of budesonide is associated with receiving a prescription of NSAIDs but not with the use of ASA, PPIs, SSRIs, and statins.

Diagnosis and Pharmacological Management of Microscopic Colitis in Geriatric Care

Microscopic colitis, a diagnosis under the umbrella term of inflammatory bowel disease, is a prevalent cause of watery diarrhea, often with symptoms of urgency and bloating, typically observed in older adults aged ≥ 60 years. Its incidence has been reported to exceed those of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in some geographical areas. Although nonpathognomonic endoscopic abnormalities, including changes of the vascular mucosal pattern; mucosal erythema; edema; nodularity; or mucosal defects, e.g., "cat scratches" have been reported, a colonoscopy is typically macroscopically normal. As reliable biomarkers are unavailable, colonoscopy using random biopsies from various parts of the colon is compulsory. Based on the histological examination under a microscope, the disease is divided into collagenous (with a thickened subepithelial collagenous band) and lymphocytic (with intraepithelial lymphocytosis) colitis, although incomplete forms exist. In routine clinical settings, the disease has a high risk of being misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome or even overlooked. Therefore, healthcare providers should be familiar with clinical features and rational management strategies. A 6-8-week oral budesonide treatment course (9 mg/day) is considered the first-line therapy, but patients often experience relapse when discontinued, or might become intolerant, dependent, or even fail to respond. Consequently, other therapeutic options (e.g., bismuth subsalicylate, biologics, loperamide, bile acid sequestrants, and thiopurines) recommended by available guidelines may be prescribed. Herein, clinically meaningful data is provided based on the latest evidence that may aid in reaching a diagnosis and establishing rational therapy in geriatric care to control symptoms and enhance the quality of life for those affected.