Comparison of Endoscopic Dysplasia Detection Techniques in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Endoscopic Techniques for Colorectal Neoplasia Surveillance in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) has been the preferred method for colonoscopy surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, with advances in endoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) techniques have emerged. This network meta-analysis evaluates the effectiveness of different endoscopy techniques for IBD patient surveillance.

METHODS

Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 2514 patients were included in the analysis, comparing endoscopy techniques in IBD patient surveillance: DCE, high-definition white light endoscopy (WLE), standard-definition WLE, i-scan, narrow band imaging (NBI), flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE), and autofluorescence imaging (AFI). We assessed the per patient neoplasia detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV), and withdrawal time between different endoscopy techniques. Moreover, subgroup analysis was conducted to investigate the neoplasia detection rate according to endoscopy techniques using various biopsy protocols.

RESULTS

Comparing neoplasia detection rates revealed that only DCE (OR: 2.56 [1.17-5.59]) significantly increased the neoplasia detection rate compared with standard-definition WLE. The subsequent rankings were high-definition WLE, NBI, FICE, i-scan, and AFI. Moreover, the PPVs of DCE, VCE, and high-definition WLE showed no significant difference compared with that of standard-definition WLE. However, DCE required a significantly longer withdrawal time. Subgroup analysis showed that DCE with random biopsy or target biopsy and high-definition WLE with target biopsy had superior neoplasia detection rates than standard-definition WLE with random biopsy.

CONCLUSION

DCE significantly outperforms standard-definition WLE in neoplasia detection rates, with random biopsy providing additional benefits. Although DCE does not lower PPV, it requires more withdrawal time. If DCE-based surveillance is not feasible, high-definition WLE with targeted biopsy should be considered as other VCE techniques offer no significant advantages.

Virtual chromoendoscopy for the identification of colonic dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A systematic review

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the colon have a higher risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). Virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) allows identification and assessment of colonic dysplasia, which might displace dye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) as the endoscopist's technique of choice for these patients within endoscopic surveillance programs.

OBJECTIVE

to analyze the best evidence available on the usefulness of VCE versus DCE for dysplasia identification in patients with long-standing colonic IBD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

a qualitative, PRISMA 2020-based systematic review of the literature was carried out in the PubMed, Science Direct, and Scielo databases until June 2023. Clinical trials, case-control studies, comparative studies, and crossover studies in English or Spanish were included that directly compared DCE versus VCE for the screening of colonic dysplasia in patients with IBD. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy studies (QUADAS) 2 was used for assessing study quality. The selected studies were evaluated by 2 independent researchers, who entered their abstracted results into a database.

RESULTS

out of 141 identified studies 9 were selected that compared DCE with VCE (1131 patients included). Six studies are prospective, randomized, controlled trials; 2 are retrospective case-control studies; and 1 is a prospective comparative study. VCE showed a dysplasia detection ability similar to that of DCE, albeit with shorter examination times (8 studies; 985 patients). Factors associated with dysplasia identification included lesions in the right colon (3 studies; 581 patients); non-polypoid lesions (1 study; 210 patients) and/or lesions with Kudo's type III-V pit patterns (2 studies; 254 patients); and patient age (1 study; 129 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

VCE may be an alternative to DCE for CRC screening in patients with long-standing IBD, with similar detection ability for colonic dysplasia and the benefit of shorter procedure times. Currently available evidence is limited in this regard given the small numbers of patients in the relevant studies, hence further research is necessary with greater numbers of included subjects.

Network Meta-Analysis: Comparison of Endoscopic Dysplasia Detection Technologies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Novel colorectal cancer endoscopic surveillance techniques for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have recently been developed.

AIMS

Compare the efficacy of currently available techniques for dysplasia detection in colonic IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search from inception to March 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies enrolling adults with IBD and having surveillance colonoscopy for dysplasia screening. Primary outcome was the number of dysplastic lesions (per-lesion analysis). Secondary outcome was the number of patients with dysplasia (per-patient analysis). We assessed endpoints using the frequentist NMA random effect model.

RESULTS

We included 25 studies (22 RCTs). 4837 patients met eligibility criteria (850 total dysplastic lesions; 105 with advanced dysplasia). Nine different screening techniques were studied. In per-lesion analysis, dye-based chromoendoscopy (DCE) ranked the highest (83%) per SUCRA ranking. DCE was superior to HD-WLE (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.06-3.00). There were no significant differences between NBI and DCE, HD-WLE with SR or CEM in head-to-head comparisons. In a sub-analysis confined to ulcerative colitis (UC), DCE ranked highest (98%) with per-lesion analysis, and was superior to NBI (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.03-2.77).

CONCLUSIONS

HD-WLE-SR, DCE and CEM demonstrated superiority over other techniques for detection of dysplasia in colonic IBD. DCE was superior for dysplasia detection in colonic IBD. DCE was superior to HD-WLE in colonic IBD. DCE was the best technique in UC. Further studies to compare HD-WLE-SR and NBI with DCE are warranted to ascertain performance equivalency and define the optimal surveillance technique.

Colorectal Neoplasia in the Setting of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (colorectal adenocarcinoma [CRC]) compared with the general population. IBD-related CRC is related to poorer outcomes than non-IBD-related CRC, and it accounts for 10% to 15% of death in patients with IBD. As such, screening guidelines have been made specific to this population recommending shorter intervals of endoscopic screening to detect dysplasia and CRC relative to the general population. Advances in endoscopic technology allow for improved visualization of dysplasia, which has led to widespread adoption of dye-spray chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsy.

Clinical usefulness of image-enhanced endoscopy for the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia

Patients with a long history of ulcerative colitis (UC) are at risk of developing a significant complication known as UC-associated neoplasia (UCAN). To reduce the risk of UCAN and the associated mortality, the current guidelines recommend initiating surveillance colonoscopy 8-10 years after confirmation of UC diagnosis. In recent years, advancements in endoscopic diagnostic technologies, including magnifying and image-enhancing techniques, have allowed for the production of high-contrast images that emphasize mucosal structures, vascular patterns, and color tones. Recently, image-enhanced endoscopy technologies have become available and offer the potential to improve the qualitative endoscopic assessment of UCAN. The use of high-definition chromoendoscopy enables the evaluation of subtle mucosal patterns in the colon. Magnifying narrow-band imaging facilitates the visualization of mucosal vascular structures. Texture and color enhancement imaging processes structure, color tone, and brightness aspects more appropriately, whereas linked color imaging optimizes the emphasis on mucosal and vascular redness. Both techniques are expected to excel in the depiction of subtle color variations and mucosal changes characteristic of UCAN. This article provides an overview of the current status and future challenges regarding the use of various image-enhanced endoscopy techniques in the diagnosis of UCAN.

Ulcerative colitis: STRIDE-ing beyond symptoms with new standards

The landscape of ulcerative colitis has changed in the last two decades. Advancements in pharmacotherapeutics have heralded the introduction of new treatment options, with many agents in development. Better clinical outcomes are seen with tighter disease control, made possible with greater understanding of inflammatory pathways and their blockade with drugs. There has been a resultant shift in treatment targets, beyond symptoms to endoscopic and histological healing. Controlling the burden of disease activity also lowers the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer screening now requires the use of dye-based agents and high-definition colonoscopy to improve the detection of colonic neoplasms.

Ulcerative colitis (K51), adults

.

Use of advanced endoscopic technology for optical characterization of neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis: Systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Advances in endoscopic technology, including magnifying and image-enhanced techniques, have been attracting increasing attention for the optical characterization of colorectal lesions. These techniques are being implemented into clinical practice as cost-effective and real-time approaches. Additionally, with the recent progress in endoscopic interventions, endoscopic resection is gaining acceptance as a treatment option in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Therefore, accurate preoperative characterization of lesions is now required. However, lesion characterization in patients with UC may be difficult because UC is often affected by inflammation, and it may be characterized by a distinct "bottom-up" growth pattern, and even expert endoscopists have relatively little experience with such cases. In this systematic review, we assessed the current status and limitations of the use of optical characterization of lesions in patients with UC.

METHODS

A literature search of online databases (MEDLINE via PubMed and CENTRAL via the Cochrane Library) was performed from 1 January 2000 to 30 November 2021.

RESULTS

The database search initially identified 748 unique articles. Finally, 25 studies were included in the systematic review: 23 focused on differentiation of neoplasia from non-neoplasia, one focused on differentiation of UC-associated neoplasia from sporadic neoplasia, and one focused on differentiation of low-grade dysplasia from high-grade dysplasia and cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Optical characterization of neoplasia in patients with UC, even using advanced endoscopic technology, is still challenging and several issues remain to be addressed. We believe that the information revealed in this review will encourage researchers to commit to the improvement of optical diagnostics for UC-associated lesions.

Colorectal Cancer in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Mechanisms and Management

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), despite decreases in CRC incidence in recent years. Chronic inflammation is the driver of neoplastic progression, resulting in dysplastic precursor lesions that may arise in multiple areas of the colon through a process of field cancerization. Colitis-associated CRC shares many molecular similarities with sporadic CRC, and preclinical investigations have demonstrated a potential role for the microbiome in concert with the host immune system in the development of colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC). Some unique molecular differences occur in CAC, but their role in the pathogenesis and behavior of inflammation-associated cancers remains to be elucidated. Nonconventional types of dysplasia have been increasingly recognized, but their natural history is not well defined, and they have not been incorporated into surveillance algorithms. The concept of cumulative inflammatory burden highlights the importance of considering histologic inflammation over time as an important risk factor for CAC. Dysplasia is arguably the most important risk factor for developing CAC, and advances have been made in the endoscopic detection and removal of precancerous lesions, thereby deferring or avoiding surgical resection. Some of the agents used to treat IBD are chemopreventive. It is hoped that by gaining better control of the underlying inflammation with newer medications and better endoscopic detection and management, a more sophisticated appreciation of clinicopathologic risk factors, and growing awareness of the genetic, immunologic, and environmental causes of colitis- associated neoplasia, that colitis-associated colorectal neoplasia will become even more predictable and manageable in the coming years.

Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Chromoendoscopy or Non-Chromoendoscopy, That Is the Question

Subjects affected by ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease with colonic localization have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Surveillance colonoscopy is recommended by international guidelines as it can detect early-stage CRC. Based on previous evidence, in 2015 the Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients International Consensus indicated dye chromoendoscopy (DCE) as the most effective technique for detecting dysplasia. However, advances in endoscopic technology such as high-definition colonoscopes and dye-less virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) may change future practice. In this review, we summarize the available evidence on CRC surveillance in IBD, focusing on the emerging role of high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) and VCE over the standard DCE, and the current role of random biopsies.

Advances in Endoscopic Procedures in Pediatric Patients

Endoscopy has been a crucial part of the diagnostic and therapeutic modality in pediatric gastrointestinal disorders. This article outlines recent advances in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy, including transnasal endoscopy, functional luminal imaging probe, peroral endoscopic myotomy, mucosal impedance, endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system, chromoendoscopy, artificial intelligence, and machine learning.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Surveillance and Management of Colorectal Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Expert Review

Improvements in disease management, as well as endoscopic technology and quality, have dramatically changed the way in which we conceptualize and manage inflammatory bowel disease-related dysplasia over the past 20 years. Based on evolving literature, we propose a conceptual model and best practice advice statements for the prevention, detection, and management of colorectal dysplasia in people with inflammatory bowel disease. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the American Gastroenterological Association Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the American Gastroenterological Association membership. It underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology.

Practice pattern variability among gastroenterologists in colorectal cancer surveillance and management of colorectal dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

There is debate on the best method of colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to examine how gastroenterologists around the world practice CRC surveillance and manage dysplastic lesions in IBD.

METHODS

A 22-question survey was emailed to gastroenterologists from 34 countries. It included questions on resources for, frequency and mode of CRC surveillance, and management of colorectal dysplasia. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used to evaluate the differences among respondents in various domains.

RESULTS

There were 217 eligible responses, with most gastroenterologists working in public hospitals (76%), and treating >10 patients with IBD weekly (71%). High-definition white light endoscopy (HDWLE) was available in 93.1% of the centers. The preferred mode of surveillance was HDWLE with dye-spray chromoendoscopy and targeted biopsies (41.2%). Fewer than 50% of physicians reported using chromoendoscopy in >50% of cases, citing time as the limiting factor (73.7%). Of these gastroenterologists 63% infrequently (<25% of cases) performed random biopsies during chromoendoscopy. They would attempt endoscopic mucosal resection for polypoid lesions >10 mm (67.2%), including >20 mm lesions with low grade dysplasia (49.8%), and non-polypoid lesions >10 mm without dysplasia (56.9%). For non-polypoid lesions >20 mm with low- and high-grade dysplasia, referral to expert endoscopists was the preferred option.

CONCLUSION

The preferred method of CRC surveillance was HDWLE with chromoendoscopy and targeted biopsies. Random biopsies were infrequently performed. The uptake of chromoendoscopy for surveillance in practice was low. Physicians varied in their approach in removing endoscopically resectable dysplastic lesions.

Chromoendoscopy With Indigo Carmine vs Virtual Chromoendoscopy (iSCAN 1) for Neoplasia Screening in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Randomized Study

INTRODUCTION

The risk of colon cancer is greater in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) than in the general population. Chromoendoscopy with dye (CE) is the currently recommended method for detecting dysplasia in screening colonoscopies in IBD patients; however, the role of virtual chromoendoscopy (VC) is not yet well defined.

OBJECTIVE

The object of this study was to compare CE and VC with the iSCAN 1 system in the detection of neoplastic lesions in IBD patients.

DESIGN

We conducted a prospective, single-center, randomized study in IBD patients who underwent a colonoscopy for colon cancer screening. A total of 129 patients were included and were randomized to undergo a CE (n = 67) or a VC (n = 62). The rates of detection of neoplastic lesions by the 2 endoscopic techniques were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 19 neoplastic lesions (9 adenomas and 10 low-grade dysplasias [LGD]) was detected in 16 patients, 12 lesions in the CE group (17.9%), and 7 lesions in the VC group (11.3%; P = 0.2); no differences were found in the overall rate of detection of lesions (neoplastic or nonneoplastic; P = 1). The median of the total examination time and endoscope withdrawal time (minutes) was significantly lower in the VC group than in the CE group (15 vs 20 and 10 vs 14, respectively; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

No differences occurred in the rate of detection of neoplastic lesions between CE and VC with iSCAN 1. The time spent on the technique with VC is significantly less than that with CE.

Possible Earlier Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Neoplasia: A Retrospective Analysis of Interval Cases during Surveillance

Background: Early detection of ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia (UCAN) is often difficult. The aim of this study was to clarify the morphology of initial UCAN. Methods: White-light colonoscopy images obtained within the 2 years before UCAN diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoint was the frequency of visible or invisible neoplasia on the endoscopic images before UCAN diagnosis. The secondary endpoints were comparisons of (1) visible or invisible neoplasia on initial endoscopic images of early-stage and advanced cancers, (2) the clinical backgrounds of patients in whom neoplasia was visible or invisible on initial endoscopic images, and (3) the clinical backgrounds of patients with distinct and indistinct UCAN borders. Results: Of the 27 UCAN lesions (11 early-stage; 16 advanced-stage), 25.9% (n = 7) were initially visible and 74.1% (n = 20) were invisible. The mean interval between the last surveillance colonoscopy and UCAN diagnosis was 14.5 ± 6.7 months. Of early-stage cancers, 18.2% (n = 2) were visible and 81.8% (n = 9) were invisible. Of advanced-stage cancers, 31.3% (n = 5) were visible and 68.8% (n = 11) were invisible. Invisible lesions were significantly more common in the rectum (p = 0.011) and tended to be more common in patients with inflammation and left-sided colitis (p = 0.084, p = 0.068, respectively). Patients with indistinct UCAN borders were significantly more likely to present with inflammation than those with distinct UCAN borders (p = 0.021). Conclusion: More careful surveillance is needed because rectum lesions and inflammation are difficult to identify as neoplasia even within the 2 years before a UCAN diagnosis.

A 1-Year Cross-sectional Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surveillance Colonoscopy Cohort Comparing High-definition White Light Endoscopy and Chromoendoscopy

BACKGROUND

We sought to compare the dysplasia detection rate of high-definition white light endoscopy (HDWLE) with that of chromoendoscopy in patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational cohort of patients with IBD who underwent surveillance colonoscopy between October 1, 2016 and September 30, 2017. We assessed the association between dysplasia detection and multiple variables.

RESULTS

A total of 808 unique colonoscopies were performed, of which 150 (18.6%) included chromoendoscopy. Primary sclerosing cholangitis was a comorbid diagnosis in 24.5% of patients. The performing endoscopist was an IBD specialist with 37.1% of patients and had >10 years' experience with 64.9% of patients. Prior dysplasia had been seen in 245 (30.3%) patients: 102 (68.0%) and 143 (22.0%) among patients who had chromoendoscopy and HDWLE, respectively. Dysplasia in polyps was found in 129 procedures (15.1%). Among patients who had chromoendoscopy and HDWLE, polypoid dysplasia was identified in 50 (33.0%) and 79 (12.0%) patients, respectively, P < 0.01. Dysplasia in random biopsies was found in 39 patients (4.8%): 15 (10%) who had chromoendoscopy and 24 (3.6%) who had HDWLE (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patient and disease characteristics significantly associated with an increased odds for polypoid dysplasia included older age at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.3 per 10 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.60), having an IBD physician endoscopist (OR = 1.6; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67), having an endoscopist with less than 10 years' experience (OR = 1.8; 95% CI (1.16-2.89), and prior random dysplasia (OR = 4.2; 95% CI (1.93-9.17). Concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis was significantly associated with random dysplasia (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.02-5.07). After multivariate analysis adjusting for these variables, chromoendoscopy was no more likely to identify dysplasia than was HDWLE.

CONCLUSIONS

Chromoendoscopy and HDWLE had a similar diagnostic yield for dysplasia detection in patients with chronic IBD-colitis after adjusting for multiple known risk factors.

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's disease and Ulcerative Colitis (Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa - GETECCU) on dysplasia screening in inflammatory bowel disease patients

Colonic inflammatory bowel diseases have a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer compared to the general population, which is why they require endoscopic screening techniques with specific follow-up intervals based on the different risk factors described on the literature. This position paper analyzes the current scientific evidence for the different endoscopic techniques available today, how their implementation should be carried out in endoscopic units and describes in detail how their implementation should be carried out, in which patients and with what interval, and finally, what should be the response to finding dysplasia, proposing a specific follow-up algorithm.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for inflammatory bowel disease 2020

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a general term for chronic or remitting/relapsing inflammatory diseases of the intestinal tract and generally refers to ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Since 1950, the number of patients with IBD in Japan has been increasing. The etiology of IBD remains unclear; however, recent research data indicate that the pathophysiology of IBD involves abnormalities in disease susceptibility genes, environmental factors and intestinal bacteria. The elucidation of the mechanism of IBD has facilitated therapeutic development. UC and CD display heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management depends on the understanding and tailoring of evidence-based interventions by physicians. In 2020, seventeen IBD experts of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology revised the previous guidelines for IBD management published in 2016. This English version was produced and modified based on the existing updated guidelines in Japanese. The Clinical Questions (CQs) of the previous guidelines were completely revised and categorized as follows: Background Questions (BQs), CQs, and Future Research Questions (FRQs). The guideline was composed of a total of 69 questions: 39 BQs, 15 CQs, and 15 FRQs. The overall quality of the evidence for each CQ was determined by assessing it with reference to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, and the strength of the recommendation was determined by the Delphi consensus process. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance for on-site physicians is provided regarding indications for proceeding with the diagnosis and treatment.

Chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies is superior to white-light endoscopy for the long-term follow-up detection of dysplasia in ulcerative colitis patients: a multicenter randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Data from single-center experience or small sample-sized studies have shown that chromoendoscopy (CE) might be superior to white-light endoscopy (WLE) for dysplasia surveillance in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. We performed a prospective randomized trial with a long-term follow-up to compare the detection rate of dysplasia among WLE with targeted biopsies (WLT), WLE with random biopsies (WLR), and dye-based CE with targeted biopsies (CET) in UC patients.

METHODS

Patients with long-standing UC were enrolled from 11 medical centers from March 2012 to December 2013 and randomized into three arms (WLT, WLR, and CET). Only high-definition endoscopy was used in all three groups. The patients were followed up by annual endoscopy with biopsies through December 2017.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up time of 55 months, a total of 122 patients with 447 colonoscopies were finally analysed in the per-protocol set: WLT (n = 43), WLR (n = 40), and CET (n = 39). A total of 34 dysplastic lesions were found in 29 colonoscopies of 21 patients. WLR and CET could identify more colonoscopies that diagnosed dysplasia than WLT (8.1% and 9.7% vs 1.9%; P = 0.014 and 0.004, respectively). WLR obtained more biopsied samples than WLT and CET (16.4 ± 5.1 vs 4.3 ± 1.4 and 4.3 ± 1.4; both P < 0.001). During the second half of the follow-up (37 - 69 months), CET could identify more colonoscopies that diagnosed dysplasia than WLT (13.3% vs 1.6%, P = 0.015) and showed a trend for increasing the detection rate compared with WLR (13.3% vs 4.9%, P = 0.107).

CONCLUSIONS

For a better outcome of cancer/dysplasia surveillance in patients with long-standing UC, CET appeared to be more effective than WLT and less tedious than WLR. CET was found to be particularly useful when a long-term (>3 years) follow-up was conducted for dysplasia surveillance. The trial was registered on www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900023689).

Endoscopic surveillance of colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel diseases: a review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is higher compared to the general population and it is related to the type, severity, duration, and extension of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to highlight current evidence from the literature supporting the role of endoscopic surveillance of CRC in patients with IBD.

EXPERT OPINION

Even in the absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evidence from the literature supports the effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance in reducing IBD-related CRC incidence and mortality. As a consequence, current guidelines recommend colonoscopy 8-10 years after disease or symptom onset in all patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) involving at least one-third of the colon and agree on the necessity of annual surveillance in high-risk patients. Nevertheless, an overall agreement on the optimal intervals for surveillance of low-intermediate risk patients is absent and 2-5 year intervals have been proposed. In the near future, further studies are needed to assess the most effective intervals and tailor the surveillance based on the personal risk profile. Additionally, further efforts should be made to evaluate the role of noninvasive tests as primary screening, thus avoiding unnecessary colonoscopies.

Curriculum for optical diagnosis training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement

This manuscript represents an official Position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) aiming to guide general gastroenterologists to develop and maintain skills in optical diagnosis during endoscopy. In general, this requires additional training beyond the core curriculum currently provided in each country. In this context, ESGE have developed a European core curriculum for optical diagnosis practice across Europe for high quality optical diagnosis training. 1:  ESGE suggests that every endoscopist should have achieved general competence in upper and/or lower gastrointestinal (UGI/LGI) endoscopy before commencing training in optical diagnosis of the UGI/LGI tract, meaning personal experience of at least 300 UGI and/or 300 LGI endoscopies and meeting the ESGE quality measures for UGI/LGI endoscopy. ESGE suggests that every endoscopist should be able and competent to perform UGI/LGI endoscopy with high definition white light combined with virtual and/or dye-based chromoendoscopy before commencing training in optical diagnosis. 2:  ESGE suggests competency in optical diagnosis can be learned by attending a validated optical diagnosis training course based on a validated classification, and self-learning with a minimum number of lesions. If no validated training course is available, optical diagnosis can only be learned by attending a non-validated onsite training course and self-learning with a minimum number of lesions. 3:  ESGE suggests endoscopists are competent in optical diagnosis after meeting the pre-adoption and learning criteria, and meeting competence thresholds by assessing a minimum number of lesions prospectively during real-time endoscopy. ESGE suggests ongoing in vivo practice by endoscopists to maintain competence in optical diagnosis. If a competent endoscopist does not perform in vivo optical diagnosis on a regular basis, ESGE suggests repeating the learning and competence phases to maintain competence.Key areas of interest were optical diagnosis training in Barrett's esophagus, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, diminutive colorectal lesions, early colorectal cancer, and neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Condition-specific recommendations are provided in the main document.

Improving quality of care in endoscopy of inflammatory bowel disease: can we do better?

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopy plays a key role in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There is an increased need for quality assurance programs that evaluate the quality, safety and patient experiences of endoscopy, by assessing procedural and clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to summarize the most important quality indicators of endoscopy in IBD patients and could serve as the basis to improve quality endoscopic procedures and patients' perception of endoscopy in the future. However, further studies and consensus reports are necessary to standardize the quality of care in the endoscopy unit of all IBD centers.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Developing an understanding of the patient-reported perception is important for both clinicians and patients, as it facilitates patient engagement with their care. Moreover, implementing education in reporting is crucial f and the use of verifiable databases, generated from electronic reporting systems, should be encouraged rather than unverified self-reporting, to have greater validity for documenting and to formally evaluate endoscopic practice data with audits. The use of artificial intelligence may improve the quality of endoscopy, by increasing the adenoma detection rate and helping endoscopists in the challenging differentiation between inflammatory and neoplastic lesions.

Dysplasia in the mucosal biopsy specimen is still a warning sign of cancer in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with ulcerative colitis are at increased risk for colorectal cancer, especially at younger ages. Our aim was to determine, in our patient cohort, the clinicopathological features, incidence, and prognosis of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center, population-based study including all 1241 patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent surgery in Helsinki University Hospital, 1991-2018. All data were from medical records, collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients with ulcerative colitis-associated cancer were operated on in Helsinki University Hospital during 1991-2018; 108 patients undergoing surgery during 2002-2018 showed dysplasia in the surgical specimen. Cancer was diagnosed preoperatively in 47 patients (66.2%). Ten patients (14.1%) had synchronous colorectal cancer, and 24 (33.8%) had synchronous dysplasia. The incidence of colorectal cancer has not changed during the study period (p = .113). Overall survival was 71.8%, and the 5-year colorectal cancer-specific survival was 81.5%.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer remained constant in our study population over three decades. The prognosis of ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer and the prognosis of sporadic colorectal cancer were comparable. One-third of the cancers were not diagnosed in preoperative colonoscopy, and the indication for surgery in such cases was dysplasia. We therefore do not recommend the endoscopic management of ulcerative colitis-associated dysplasia.

Meta-analysis of Virtual-based Chromoendoscopy Compared With Dye-spraying Chromoendoscopy Standard and High-definition White Light Endoscopy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease at Increased Risk of Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. We sought to assess the comparative efficacy of virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) vs high definition white light endoscopy (HDWLE) or dye-spraying chromoendoscopy (DCE) through a meta-analysis and rating the quality of evidence.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed through February 15, 2019. Primary outcomes were number of patients in whom dysplasia was identified and number of dysplastic lesions identified in these patients. We included only randomized control trials (RCTs) and performed meta-analysis using RevMan5.3.

RESULTS

Of the 3205 studies identified, 11 RCTs were included, with a total of 1328 patients. Per patient analysis, VCE was not statistically different compared with DCE (risk ratio [RR] 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.08) or HDWLE (RR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.15). However, per dysplasia analysis, VCE was not statistically different compared with DCE (RR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.47-1.11) and inferior compared with HDWLE (RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.88). The quality of evidence was moderate in the HDWLE and low to moderate in the DCE studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on this meta-analysis, VCE was as good as HDWLE and DCE in identifying dysplasia per patient analysis. However, per dysplasia analysis, VCE was inferior compared with HDWLE and no different from DCE. Further studies need to examine the efficacy of each individual VCE technique.

Improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease

Several recommendations have addressed the topic of improving the quality of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, there is variation between these recommendations, in part due to the absence of well-defined quality indicators, suggesting that these quality indicators should be studied and developed. We did a systematic review of evidence related to surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease to look at the different variables in this practice and offer a critique of the quality control measures before, during, and after the procedure. We identified several key quality measures that could be adopted in clinical practice, including control of inflammation, optimal bowel preparation, ideal time allocation, training, sedation, detection and characterisation of lesions, therapeutic management of the lesions, and colonoscopic reports. However, further primary research and consensus reports are needed to continue developing roadmaps at a global level.

Surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease: is chromoendoscopy the only way to go? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background and study aims  Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) have higher risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Guidelines recommend dysplasia surveillance with dye-spraying chromoendoscopy (DCE). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) available and compare the efficacy of different endoscopic methods of surveillance for dysplasia in patients with UC and CD. Methods  Databases searched were Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and SCIELO/LILACS. It was estimated the risk difference (RD) for dichotomous outcomes (number of patients diagnosed with one or more dysplastic lesions, total number of dysplastic lesions diagnosed and number of dysplastic lesions detected by targeted biopsies) and mean difference for continuous outcomes (procedure time). Results  This study included 17 RCTs totaling 2,457 patients. There was superiority of DCE when compared to standard-definiton white light endoscopy (SD-WLE). When compared with high-definition (HD) WLE, no difference was observed in all outcomes (number of patients with dysplasia (RD 0.06; 95 % CI [-0.01, 0.13])). Comparing other techniques, no difference was observed between DCE and virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE - including narrow-band imaging [NBI], i-SCAN and flexible spectral imaging color enhancement), in all outcomes except procedure time (mean difference, 6.33 min; 95 % CI, 1.29, 11.33). DCE required a significantly longer procedure time compared with WLE (mean difference, 7.81 min; 95 % CI, 2.76, 12.86). Conclusions  We found that dye-spraying chromoendoscopy detected more patients and dysplastic lesions than SD-WLE. Although no difference was observed between DCE and HD-WLE or narrow-band imaging, the main outcomes favored numerically dye-spraying chromoendoscopy, except procedure time. Regarding i-SCAN, FICE and auto-fluorescence imaging, there is still not enough evidence to support or not their recommendation.

Endoscopic surveillance strategies for dysplasia in ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disorder with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). This has led to the implementation of surveillance programmes to minimise this risk. Overall, these proactive programmes in association with better medical therapies have reduced the incidence of CRC in this population. Specific populations remain at increased risk, such as younger age at diagnosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, colonic strictures and pseudopolyps. The majority of gastrointestinal international societies favour chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies or random biopsies. The aim of this review is to present the current literature on dysplasia surveillance, the methodology and endoscopic technology available to assess dysplasia in UC.

Systematic review with network meta-analysis: endoscopic techniques for dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

International guidelines recommend dysplasia surveillance in IBD.

AIM

To compare endoscopic techniques for dysplasia surveillance METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL for randomised trials through May 2019. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) for binary and mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes, using frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis. We assessed study risk of bias and appraised evidence certainty using GRADE.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials (2638 participants) were included. Standard definition white-light endoscopy (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.73; high certainty) and i-SCAN (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.90; moderate certainty) had lower odds of detecting neoplasia than chromoendoscopy. Fujinon intelligent colour enhancement (FICE), standard definition white-light endoscopy and i-SCAN had lower odds for this outcome than full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy (ORs 0.02 to 0.15; low certainty). Standard definition white-light endoscopy had lower odds of detecting nonpolypoid neoplasia than full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy, narrow band imaging, chromoendoscopy and high definition white-light endoscopy (ORs 0.01-0.14; moderate certainty). Full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy ranked as the best technique for both outcomes (moderate certainty). Standard definition white-light endoscopy had lower odds of detecting neoplasia by target biopsy (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08-0.91) and had shorter procedure time (MD -14.81 minutes, 95% CI -25.03, -4.06) than chromoendoscopy (moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Chromoendoscopy, high definition white-light endoscopy, narrow band imaging, autofluorescence, FICE and full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy may be comparable for dysplasia surveillance. Standard definition white-light endoscopy and i-SCAN probably provide lower yields for neoplasia identification. Full spectrum high definition white-light endoscopy may represent the first-line approach.

Meta-analysis of dye-based chromoendoscopy compared with standard- and high-definition white-light endoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease at increased risk of colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with ulcerative colitis have an increased risk of colorectal cancer. We sought to assess the comparative efficacy of standard white-light endoscopy (SDWLE) or high-definition white-light endoscopy (HDWLE) versus dye-based chromoendoscopy through a meta-analysis and rate the quality of evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed in April 2018. The primary outcome was the number of patients in whom dysplasia was identified using a per patient analysis in randomized controlled trials (RCT) and analyzed separately for non-RCTs. Analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 reporting random-effects risk ratios.

RESULTS

Of the 27,904 studies identified, 10 studies were included 6 of which were RCTs (3 SDWLE and 3 HDWLE). Seventeen percent (84/494) of patients were noted to have dysplasia using chromoendoscopy compared with 11% (55/496) with white-light endoscopy (relative risk [RR] 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.10). When analyzed separately, chromoendoscopy (n = 249) was more effective at identifying dysplasia than SDWLE (n = 248) (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.15-3.91), but chromoendoscopy (n = 245) was not more effective compared with HDWLE (n = 248) (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.84-2.18). The quality of evidence was moderate. In non-RCTs, dysplasia was identified in 16% (114/698) of patients with chromoendoscopy compared with 6% (62/1069) with white-light endoscopy (RR, 3.41; 95% CI, 2.13-5.47). Chromoendoscopy (n = 58) was more effective than SDWLE (n = 141) for identification of dysplasia (RR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.38-8.99), and chromoendoscopy (n = 113) was also more effective than HDWLE (n = 257) (RR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.62-6.13). The quality of the evidence was very low.

CONCLUSION

Based on this meta-analysis, non-RCTs demonstrate a benefit of chromoendoscopy over SDWLE and HDWLE, whereas RCTs only show a small benefit of chromoendoscopy over SDWLE, but not over HDWLE.

Augmented Endoscopy for Surveillance of Colonic Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Considering the high risk of dysplasia and cancer in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], surveillance is advocated. However, international guidelines do not reach a uniform recommendation on the way to perform surveillance. We performed a systematic review with a meta-analysis to assess the best endoscopic surveillance strategy in colonic IBD.

METHODS

The systematic review was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases to identify studies comparing white light endoscopy [WLE] and augmented endoscopy [AE] in the detection of dysplasia/neoplasia in colonic IBD. A sub-analysis between dye-spray chromoendoscopy [DCE], narrow-band imaging [NBI], I-SCAN, full-spectrum endoscopy [FUSE], and auto-fluorescence imaging [AFI] was also performed. Furthermore, a meta-regression and a network meta-analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies [6167 IBD patients with 2024 dysplastic lesions] met the inclusion criteria. There was no publication bias. AE showed a higher likelihood of detecting dysplasia than WLE (19.3% vs 8.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.036), with an incremental yield [IY] of 10.8%. DCE [OR = 2.605] and AFI [OR = 3.055] had higher likelihood of detecting dysplasia than WLE; otherwise, I-SCAN [OR = 1.096], NBI [OR = 0.650], and FUSE [OR = 1.118] were not superior to WLE. Dysplasia was found in 1256/7267 targeted biopsies [17.3%] and in 363/110 040 random biopsies [0.33%] [OR = 66.559, IY = 16.9%]. Meta-regression found no variable impacting on the efficacy of AE techniques. Network meta-analysis identified a significant superiority of DCE to WLE in detecting dysplasia [OR 2.12], but no other single technique was found to be superior to all others in dysplasia detection.

CONCLUSIONS

DCE was associated with higher likelihood of discovering dysplastic lesions than WLE. Chromoendoscopy is the best supported endoscopic technique for IBD surveillance.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: Chromoendoscopy versus white light endoscopy in detection of dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare chromoendoscopy (CE) and white light endoscopy (WLE) for dysplasia surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 prospective studies and compared the CE and WLE groups. A fixed-effect model was used unless the heterogeneity was high.

RESULTS

CE detected more patients with dysplasia (relative risk [RR] 2.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62-2.61) and more dysplastic lesions (RR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.40-2.98) than WLE. When magnification was added to CE, the detection rate of patients with dysplasia and dysplastic lesions improved. CE also detected more patients with dysplasia than high-definition WLE (RR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.11-2.29). Compared with WLE, the incremental yield of CE for detecting patients with dysplasia was 9%. CE was superior to WLE in detecting non-polypoid dysplastic lesions (RR 1.38, 95% CI:1.02-1.88). CE had no advantage for detecting polypoid dysplastic lesions compared with WLE.

CONCLUSIONS

CE is superior to WLE in the surveillance of dysplasia in IBD patients. It is thus necessary to use CE in the surveillance of dysplasia in patients with IBD in clinical practice. Adding magnification improves the detection rate.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder. These guidelines indicate the preferred approach to the management of adults with UC and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process. In instances where the evidence was not appropriate for GRADE, but there was consensus of significant clinical merit, "key concept" statements were developed using expert consensus. These guidelines are meant to be broadly applicable and should be viewed as the preferred, but not only, approach to clinical scenarios.

Controversies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Exploring Clinical Dilemmas Using Cochrane Reviews

A symposium organized by the Cochrane IBD Group and presented at the 2017 Digestive Disease Week annual meeting reviewed the recent literature on several controversial topics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management including the efficacy of oral aminosalicylates for induction and maintenance of Crohn's disease (CD), the feasibility of drug withdrawal in patients with quiescent CD, and strategies for detecting colon cancer in patients with IBD. This article summarizes the data presented at that session.

Role of interventional inflammatory bowel disease in the era of biologic therapy: a position statement from the Global Interventional IBD Group

Interventional (or therapeutic) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) endoscopy has an expanding role in the treatment of disease and surgical adverse events. Endoscopic therapy has been explored and used in the management of strictures, fistulas/abscesses, colitis-associated neoplasia, postsurgical acute or chronic leaks, and obstructions. The endoscopic therapeutic modalities include balloon dilation, stricturotomy, stent placement, fistulotomy, fistula injection and clipping, sinusotomy, EMR, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. With a better understanding of the disease course of IBD, improved long-term impact of medical therapy, and advances in endoscopic technology, we can foresee interventional IBD becoming an integrated part of the multidisciplinary approach to patients with complex IBD.

Screening for colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Should we already perform chromoendoscopy in all our patients?

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (commonly known as IBD) have a greater risk of colorectal cancer than the general population. Therefore, they are included in special programs for screening and follow-up. Chromoendoscopy, which has a high diagnostic yield in the detection of neoplasia, is generally the recommended endoscopy technique. However, this procedure does have some disadvantages (long examination time, need for optimal bowel preparation, specialist training), which increase its cost. How then can we overcome these barriers? First, it is necessary to educate hospital managers and directors of the advantages of chromoendoscopy in patients with IBD. Second, at least one endoscopist per center should be a specialist in the technique. Third, we should train nursing staff in the preparation of the dye. Finally, each examination should be given the time it needs. Even though clinical practice guidelines do not yet recommend the use of virtual imaging techniques such as narrow band imaging, a recent study reported no differences between the two approaches for the detection of tumors. Therefore, we believe that all patients should undergo chromoendoscopy. In the future, centers without access to dyes or where other barriers exist should at least perform narrow band imaging.