Colon Surgery Risk With Corticosteroids Versus Immunomodulators or Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients With Clostridium difficile Infection

Impact of Clostridioides difficile Infection on the Outcome of Severe Flare of Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) are both independently associated with poor outcome. The impact of CDI on the outcome of severe flare of ulcerative colitis is not studied. In the current study, we assess the impact of CDI on the outcome of ASUC.

METHODS

Data of ASUC patients were collected from January 2022 to July 2024. Parameters included were demographic profile, disease characteristics, biochemical investigations, and stool C. difficile toxin A/B (CDTA). Patients were categorized into ASUC-CDI and ASUC groups. Primary outcomes were need of rescue therapy, colectomy, and mortality during index admission. Six-month outcomes were flare of disease, colectomy, and mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients included, 91 (77.8%) patients were in the ASUC group and 26 (22.2%) in the ASUC-CDI group. Baseline parameters were similar between the 2 groups. Overall, 86 (73.5%) patients responded to corticosteroid therapy. Need of rescue therapy (24.2% vs. 33.6%, P=0.287), colectomy (3.3% vs. 11.5%, P=0.093), and mortality (1.1% vs. 3.8%, P=0.345) rates were comparable between the ASUC and ASUC-CDI groups. Six-month colectomy (4.4% vs. 15.4%) and mortality (1.1% vs. 7.7%) rates were numerically higher in the ASUC-CDI group, though statistically nonsignificant.

CONCLUSION

The immediate and short-term outcome of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis in the presence of C. difficile infection is determined by the severity of ulcerative colitis flare.

Fidaxomicin for Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. Data on fidaxomicin use in IBD remain scarce. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of fidaxomicin for CDI and its impact on IBD outcomes in a large international cohort.

METHODS

Adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) treated with fidaxomicin for documented CDI were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was CDI recurrence rate within 8 weeks (C. difficile toxin detection and CDI-targeted therapy). Secondary outcomes included sustained response (no CDI-targeted therapy within 12 weeks), IBD therapy escalation, colectomy rate, and all-cause mortality within 30, 90, and 180 days.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (57 UC and 39 CD) from 20 IBD centers were included. Most were on advanced IBD therapy. Half had a previous CDI episode, 15% a severe episode. CDI recurrence rate was 10% at week 8, and sustained response 82% at week 12. Compared with patients with previous CDI episode, patients at first episode tended to have a lower recurrence (4.3% vs 16%; P = .06) and higher sustained response (91% vs 75%; P = .04) rate. IBD therapy escalation was required in 48% with a numerically lower need for patients achieving vs not-achieving sustained response within 30 days (12% vs 20%; P = .42). Five UC patients underwent colectomy. One death unrelated to CDI or IBD occurred. One moderate and 5 mild adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Fidaxomicin was effective and safe in IBD patients with CDI, with greater effectiveness in CDI-naïve patients, potentially influencing short-term IBD outcomes.

Enteric Infection at Flare of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Impacts Outcomes at 2 Years

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) following flare complicated by enteric infection (EI) are limited by follow-up duration and insufficient assessment of the role of non-Clostridioides difficile pathogens. We compared 2-year IBD outcomes following flare with and without EI.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults evaluated with stool PCR testing for IBD flare. Subjects were stratified by presence of EI at flare and were matched for age, sex, and date to those without EI. The primary outcome was a composite of steroid-dependent IBD, colectomy, and/or IBD therapy class change/dose escalation at 2 years. Additional analyses were performed by dividing the EI group into C. difficile infection (CDI) and non-CDI EI, and further subdividing non-CDI EI into E. coli subtypes and other non-CDI EI.

RESULTS

We identified 137 matched subjects, of whom 62 (45%) had EI (40 [29%] CDI; 17 [12%] E. coli). Enteric infection at flare was independently associated with the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 4.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-11.5). After dividing EI into CDI and non-CDI EI, only CDI at flare was independently associated with the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.46-12.6). After separating E. coli subtypes from non-CDI EI, E. coli infection and CDI at flare were both independently associated with the primary outcome; other EI was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteric infection at flare-specifically with CDI-is associated with worse IBD outcomes at 2 years. The relationship between E. coli subtypes at flare and subsequent IBD outcomes requires further investigation.

Inflammatory bowel disease and Clostridium difficile infection: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management

As a frequent complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) was confirmed to not only aggravate the symptoms of IBD but also result in unexpected outcomes, including death. With the increasing prevalence rate of IBD and the updating of CDI diagnosis, the incidence of CDI in IBD patients is also seen rising. Although a detection method consisting of glutamate dehydrogenase immunoassay or nucleic acid amplification test and then toxin A/B enzyme immunoassay was recommended and widely adopted, the diagnosis of CDI in IBD is still a challenge because of the overlap between the symptoms of CDI in IBD and CDI itself. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are the first-line therapy for CDI in IBD; however, the treatment has different effects due to the complexity of IBD patients' conditions and the choice of different treatment schemes. Although the use of fecal microbial transplantation is now in the ascendant for IBD management, the prospects are still uncertain and the prevention and treatment of the recurrence of CDI in IBD remain a clinical challenge. In this paper, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, prevention, and therapy of CDI in IBD were summarized and presented.

The Current Knowledge on Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) represents a major health burden with substantial economic and clinical impact. Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) were identified as a risk category for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). In addition to traditional risk factors for C. difficile acquisition, IBD-specific risk factors such as immunosuppression, severity and extension of the inflammatory disease were identified. C. difficile virulence factors, represented by both toxins A and B, induce the damage of the intestinal mucosa and vascular changes, and promote the inflammatory host response. Given the potential life-threatening complications, early diagnostic and therapeutic interventions are required. The screening for CDI is recommended in IBD exacerbations, and the diagnostic algorithm consists of clinical evaluation, enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) or nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). An increased length of hospitalization, increased colectomy rate and mortality are the consequences of concurrent CDI in IBD patients. Selection of CD strains of higher virulence, antibiotic resistance, and the increasing rate of recurrent infections make the management of CDI in IBD more challenging. An individualized therapeutic approach is recommended to control CDI as well as IBD flare. Novel therapeutic strategies have been developed in recent years in order to manage severe, refractory or recurrent CDI. In this article, we aim to review the current evidence in the field of CDI in patients with underlying IBD, pointing to pathogenic mechanisms, risk factors for infection, diagnostic steps, clinical impact and outcomes, and specific management.

Diagnosis and management of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) may complicate the course of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. The clinical presentation of CDI in this population is often atypical, and patients may experience exacerbations of their underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) secondary to C. difficile. In this review, we aim to review the risk factors, diagnosis, and management of CDI in the context of IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with colonic involvement of their IBD are at higher risk for CDI and colonization may be more common than in the general population. Therefore, CDI is confirmed using a two-step approach to stool testing. Oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin are the preferred agents for nonfulminant disease, and oral metronidazole is no longer recommended as first-line therapy. For all patients with CDI recurrence, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) should be considered, as this has been shown to be safe and effective. Among those who have worsening of their underlying IBD, retrospective research suggest that outcomes are improved for those who undergo escalation of immunosuppression with appropriate antimicrobial treatment of C. difficile, however prospective data are needed.

SUMMARY

CDI may complicate the course of IBD, however the presentation may not be typical. Therefore, all patients with worsening gastrointestinal symptoms should be evaluated for both CDI and IBD exacerbation. Providers should consider FMT for all patients with recurrent CDI as well as escalation of immunosuppression for patients who fail to improve with appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

Management of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common diarrheal illness with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal manifestations and complications. The most common infectious complication associated with IBD is Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Active IBD predisposes to CDI due to alterations in the gut microbiome. C. difficile is a toxin producing bacterium leading to worsening of underlying IBD, increasing the risk of IBD treatment failure and an increased risk of hospitalization and surgery. Since the symptoms of CDI overlap with those of an IBD flare; it is prudent to recognize that the diagnosis of CDI is challenging and diagnostic tests (nucleic-acid and toxin-based assays) should be interpreted in context of symptoms and test performance. First line treatments for management of CDI in IBD include vancomycin or fidaxomicin. Recurrence prevention strategies should be implemented to mitigate recurrent CDI risk. One needs to monitor IBD disease progression and manage immunosuppression. The risk of recurrent CDI after a primary infection is higher in IBD compared to non-IBD patients. Microbiota restoration therapies are effective to prevent recurrent CDI in IBD patients. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, outcomes and management of both CDI and IBD, in CDI complicating IBD.

The interplay of Clostridioides difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease of the intestinal tract that commonly presents with diarrhea. Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common complications associated with IBD that lead to flare-ups of underlying IBD. The pathophysiology of CDI includes perturbations of the gut microbiota, which makes IBD a risk factor due to the gut microbial alterations that occur in IBD, predisposing patients CDI even in the absence of antibiotics. Superimposed CDI not only worsens IBD symptoms but also leads to adverse outcomes, including treatment failure and an increased risk of hospitalization, surgery, and mortality. Due to the overlapping symptoms and concerns with false-positive molecular tests for CDI, diagnosing CDI in patients with IBD remains a clinical challenge. It is crucial to have a high index of suspicion for CDI in patients who seem to be experiencing an exacerbation of IBD symptoms. Vancomycin and fidaxomicin are the first-line treatments for the management of CDI in IBD. Microbiota restoration therapies effectively prevent recurrent CDI in IBD patients. Immunosuppression for IBD in IBD patients with CDI should be managed individually, based on a thorough clinical assessment and after weighing the pros and cons of escalation of therapy. This review summarizes the epidemiology, pathophysiology, the diagnosis of CDI in IBD, and outlines the principles of management of both CDI and IBD in IBD patients with CDI.

Novel risk factors and outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease patients with Clostridioides difficile infection

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at significantly increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) with an increased risk of adverse outcomes including increased in-hospital mortality, IBD treatment failure, re-hospitalization, and high CDI recurrence rates. The existing literature on predictors of these adverse outcomes is limited. We evaluated four potentially modifiable novel risk factors [body mass index (BMI), statin use, opioid use, and antidepressant use] on CDI risk and adverse outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Using a retrospective design, variables were abstracted from records for patients with IBD and CDI from 2008 to 2013. Statistical analysis comprised descriptive statistics and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

There were 137 patients with IBD and CDI included in this study. On multivariate analysis controlling for age, 43% of patients in the overweight BMI category had severe or severe, complicated CDI, compared with 22% of patients in the underweight/normal BMI [odds ratio (OR) 2.85, p = 0.02] and 19% in the obese category (OR 3.95, p = 0.04). Statin use was associated with severe or severe, complicated CDI when controlling for age and BMI (OR 5.66, p = 0.01). There was no association between statin use and IBD exacerbations following CDI. Opioid and antidepressant use were not associated with disease severity or frequency of IBD exacerbations following CDI.

CONCLUSIONS

An overweight BMI and statin use were associated with severe or severe, complicated CDI in IBD patients. Further studies are needed to better understand how these factors impact management of patients with IBD to improve clinical outcomes and potentially reduce the risk of complications from CDI.

Positivity of Stool Pathogen Sampling in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Flares and Its Association With Disease Course

OBJECTIVES

Acute exacerbations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may involve enteric pathogen. We aimed to assess the frequency and outcomes of Clostridium difficille toxin (CDT) and non-CDT enteric infections in symptomatic pediatric patients with IBD.

METHODS

Patients' records were retrospectively searched for disease flares in which stool samples were collected for enteric pathogens. Each patient with a positive sample was matched with a patient with IBD flare and negative samples for analyzing 1-year outcomes following sampling.

RESULTS

A total of 618 pediatric patients with IBD [Crohn's disease, n = 439 (71%), mean age at diagnosis 13.0 ± 3.4 years, girls, n = 264 (42.7%)] had 1048 stool samples during the study period (2001-2018). Of 914 bacterial cultures, 40 (4.3%) were positive, 30 (75%) of which, positive for Campylobacter jejuni. Of 393 samples for CDT, 28 (7.1%) were positive while parasitic infection rate was 21/529 (3.9%).Overall, 19 positive C jejuni cases and 19 positive CDT cases with matching controls were examined. During 12 months of follow-up, the mean number of disease flares and emergency room visits was higher among patients with positive CDT (1.5 ± 1.4 vs 0.5 ± 0.9, P = 0.019, 1.3 ± 1.5 vs 0.4 ± 0.8, P = 0.05, respectively) with a numeric increase of surgical interventions (3 vs 0, P = 0.08). There were no significant differences in disease outcomes between patients with C jejuni infections and matched controls.

CONCLUSIONS

C difficile and C jejuni are the most common enteric infections among pediatric patients with IBD but only clostridial infection was associated with a more severe disease course within 12 months.

Low glutamate dehydrogenase levels are associated with colonization in Clostridium difficile PCR-only positive patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a diagnostic challenge in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We tested novel biomarkers to differentiate CDI from colonization in patients without (CDI-only) and with IBD (IBD-CDI).

METHODS

Samples were enzyme immunoassay (EIA)-tested for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin, followed by reflex PCR. Quantitative GDH [(qGDH) - a novel indicator of Clostridium difficile load] and stool lactoferrin were tested at days 0, 3 and 10 during antibiotic treatment. Samples were also analyzed for toxin B cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CNA) and toxigenic culture, gold standards to detect free toxin and virulent bacteria, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-five symptomatic patients (28 CDI-only, 13 with Crohn's disease, 4 with ulcerative colitis) were recruited with 3 sequential samples available for 36 (21 CDI-only, 15 IBD-CDI). Thirty-nine of 45 (87%) cases were toxigenic culture-positive. In the CDI-only group, 78.6% were positive for EIA-toxin, 21.4% were PCR-positive while 82.1% were CNA-positive. In the IBD-CDI group, only one patient (6%) was EIA-toxin positive and 17.6% CNA-positive. The median qGDH level at day 0 was higher in CNA-positive patients compared to CNA-negative patients (1111 vs. 146 ng/g, P = 0.004) and dropped together with lactoferrin from day 0 to 10. CDI eradication improved symptoms in 72.2% of patients with CDI-only. In 60% of patients with IBD-CDI, eradication was ineffective, with symptoms improving in 89% of them after IBD therapy intensification.

CONCLUSION

In patients with IBD-CDI, PCR-only positivity might mainly reflect colonization rather than disease. C. difficile load by qGDH correlates with CNA-detected toxin and together with stool lactoferrin might differentiate CDI from colonization in patients with IBD.

The management of the hospitalized ulcerative colitis patient: the medical-surgical conundrum

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review article, we address emerging evidence for the medical and surgical treatment of the hospitalized patient with ulcerative colitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the colon and rectum. About one-fifth of patients will be hospitalized from ulcerative colitis, and about 20-30%, experiencing an acute flare will undergo colectomy. Because of the significant clinical consequences, patients hospitalized need prompt evaluation for potential complications, stratification of disease severity, and a multidisciplinary team approach to therapy, which involves both the gastroenterologist and surgeon. Although corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, second-line medical rescue options, primarily infliximab or cyclosporine, are considered within 3-5 days of presentation. In conjunction, an early surgical consultation to present the possibility of a staged proctocolectomy as one of the therapeutic options is equally important.

SUMMARY

A coordinated multidisciplinary, individualized approach to treatment, involving the patient preferences throughout the process, is optimal in providing patient-centered effective care.

Comparison of outcomes of continuation/discontinuation of 5-aminosalicylic acid after initiation of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Few maintenance therapeutic options are available for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on the effects of continuing 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) treatment in patients who commence on biologics as maintenance treatment remain scarce. We evaluated IBD patient outcomes after continuation/discontinuation of 5-ASA when biologics were administered as maintenance treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, laboratory, and imaging data of patients diagnosed with IBD (ulcerative colitis (UC), 763; Crohn's disease (CD), 537) in the Gil Medical Center (GMC) from February 2005 to June 2018. We divided patients administered with biologics as maintenance treatment into those who did and did not continue on 5-ASA and compared the efficacies of the two treatment options using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 1300 total IBD patients, 128 (UC, 63; CD, 65) were prescribed biologics as induction and maintenance treatments. The median follow-up period was 109.5 weeks. All cases were divided into those who did or did not combine 5-ASA with biologics as maintenance treatments. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the event-free survival (exacerbation of disease activity) of UC patients treated with biologics and 5-ASA (n = 42) was not significantly lower than that of those taking biologics alone (n = 21) (log rank test, P = 0.68). The same was true of CD patients (n = 42, biologics and 5-ASA; n = 23, biologics only) (log rank test, P = 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuation of 5-ASA after initiation of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents did not improve prognosis in Korean IBD patients compared with that of those who discontinued 5-ASA during maintenance treatment, particularly in patients who experienced more than two disease aggravations.

Role of Cycle Threshold in Clostridioides difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Distinguishing Clostridioides difficile infection from colonization is challenging in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Cycle threshold (Ct), the cutoff for PCR positivity, has been investigated in non-IBD patients.

Methods

Patients with positive C. difficile PCR (25 IBD, 51 non-IBD) were identified retrospectively. Fifteen-day outcomes were assessed.

Results

Ct correlated with diarrheal days in non-IBD (P = 0.048), but not IBD patients (P = 0.769). IBD patients had shorter LOS and less severe infection, but more diarrheal days (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

IBD patients had a milder course but Ct results were not significant. Larger studies are needed to clarify utility of Ct in IBD.