Oncological outcomes of unsuspected pN2 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Effect of Endosonography on Overall Survival in Patients with Radiological N1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

It is unclear whether performing endosonography first in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with radiological N1 (rN1) has any advantages over surgery without nodal staging. We aimed to compare surgery without endosonography to performing endosonography first in rN1 on the overall survival (OS) of patients with NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with rN1 NSCLC between 2013 and 2019. Patients were divided into 'no endosonography' and 'endosonography first' groups. We investigated the effect of nodal staging through endosonography on OS using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

In the no endosonography group, pathologic N2 occurred in 23.0% of patients. In the endosonography first group, endosonographic N2 and N3 occurred in 8.6% and 1.6% of patients, respectively. Additionally, 51 patients were pathologic N2 among 249 patients who underwent surgery and mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) in endosonography first group. After PSM, the 5-year OSs were 68.1% and 70.6% in the no endosonography and endosonography first groups, respectively. However, the 5-year OS was 80.2% in the subgroup who underwent surgery and MLND of the endosonography first group. Moreover, in patients receiving surgical resection with MLND, the endosonography first group tended to have a better OS than the no endosonography group in adjusted analysis using various models.

CONCLUSION

In rN1 NSCLC, preoperative endosonography shows better OS than surgery without endosonography. For patients with rN1 NSCLC who are candidates for surgery, preoperative endosonography may help improve survival through patient selection.

Intraoperative rapid diagnosis of pleural lavage cytology in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Positive pleural lavage cytology (PLC +) is a poor prognostic factor for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the impact of intraoperative rapid diagnosis of PLC (rPLC) are lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of rPLC before resection during surgery.

METHODS

A total of 1,838 patients who underwent rPLC for NSCLC between September 2002 and December 2014 were studied retrospectively. We assessed the clinicopathological factors between rPLC findings and the impact on survival of patients with curative resection.

RESULTS

The rPLC + status was observed in 96 (5.3%) among 1,838 patients. The rPLC + group had more unsuspected N2 (30%) than the rPLC- group (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent lobectomy or more extensive resection with rPLC + , negative rPLC (rPLC-), and microscopic pleural dissemination (PD) and/or malignant pleural effusion (PE) were 67.3, 81.3, and 11.0%, respectively. In the rPLC + group, the prognosis of patients with pN2 was equal to that of pN0-1 (5-year OS: 77.9% vs. 63.4%, p = 0.263). Undetectable dissemination in the first evaluation immediately after starting surgery was found in 9% of rPLC + patients by additional evaluation of the thoracic cavity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with rPLC + have more favorable survival than those with microscopic PD/PE after surgery. Curative resection should be performed in patients with rPLC + , even if N2 is detected during surgery. However, the rPLC + group often has N2 upstaging; therefore, systematic nodal dissection should be performed in rPLC + patients for exact staging. rPLC may contribute to preventing oversight PD by re-evaluation during surgery.

Feasibility and oncological outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy for pathologic N2 disease in non-small cell lung cancer: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and oncological outcomes between video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pathologic N2 (pN2) disease. Data for analysis included short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes. We calculated the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous data and the results of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were pooled using the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q-test and I² -test. Sensitivity analysis was performed to further examine the stability of pooled HRs and WMDs. In the pooled analyses of 10 eligible studies, results showed that VATS for NSCLC patients with pN2 disease yielded significantly less blood loss (WMD = -61.43; 95% confidence intervals [CI], [-87.69, -35.18]; p < 0.001), less post-operation hospital stay (WMD, -1.62; 95% CI, [-2.96, -0.28]; p = 0.02), and comparable operation time (WMD,  -8.32; 95% CI, [-23.88, 7.23]; p = 0.29), post-operation complication rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.95; 95% CI, [0.78, 1.15]; p = 0.59), chest tube duration to thoracotomy (WMD, -0.64; 95% CI, [-1.45, 0.17]; p = 0.12), extent of lymph node dissection (WMD, -1.46; 95% CI, [-3.87, 0.95]; p = 0.23) and 1-year OS (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, [0.96, 1.76]; p = 0.09) than thoracotomy. However, VATS may improve 3-year OS (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, [1.12, 1.42]; p = 0.0002) and yield comparable 1-year DFS (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, [0.89, 1.46]; p = 0.32) and 3-year DFS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, [0.88, 1.22]; p = 0.70) for NSCLC patients with pN2 disease than thoracotomy. VATS could yield less surgical trauma and improve post-operative recovery than thoracotomy. Moreover, VATS may improve the oncological outcomes of those patients.